arxiv: 2605.04621 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-lat· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Molien--Weyl Singlet Counting and BFSS₂--Factorization in Gaussian Matrix QM

Badis Ydri

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-lathep-ph

keywords Molien-Weyl projectionBFSS matrix modelsinglet spectrumGram operatorspartition functionmatrix quantum mechanicsinfrared spectrumgauged oscillator

0 comments

The pith

The very low temperature bosonic singlet spectrum in BFSS matrix models is controlled by the quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_a X_b).

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper combines a large-d Gaussian reduction with the Molien-Weyl projection to reorganize the singlet sector of mass-deformed BFSS matrix quantum mechanics. It establishes that the infrared bosonic singlets are governed by the quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_a X_b), of which there are exactly d(d+1)/2. The resulting spectrum begins as collections of BFSS2-like towers. For the special case d=2 and N=2 an exact factorization of the full singlet partition function is derived from the SU(2) tensor structure. A reader cares because the result supplies a simple, dimension-independent organizing principle for the low-energy dynamics of these models.

Core claim

The very-low-temperature bosonic singlet spectrum is universally controlled by the quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_aX_b), whose number is d(d+1)/2. For N=2 this is shown by explicit residue computations and character methods; for N>2 character analysis supports the same counting. The infrared spectrum therefore begins as a collection of BFSS2-like Gram towers, although higher invariant structures modify the full partition function at higher temperatures. A Hamiltonian derivation further establishes the exceptional exact factorization at (d,N)=(2,2), where the BFSS3 singlet partition function equals the cube of the BFSS2 one for all temperatures.

What carries the argument

The Molien-Weyl integral applied after the large-d Gaussian reduction to a gauged harmonic oscillator, which isolates singlets and shows that the infrared counting is carried entirely by the quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_a X_b).

Load-bearing premise

The large-d Gaussian reduction accurately represents the bulk matrix dynamics through a gauged harmonic oscillator whose singlets are then isolated by the Molien-Weyl projection.

What would settle it

An explicit residue or Monte Carlo computation of the low-temperature singlet partition function for N=3 and d=3 that deviates from the predicted counting based on the d(d+1)/2 Gram operators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04621 by Badis Ydri.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The static diagonal (Polyakov) gauge. 8 view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Gaussian BFSS3 model for (N,Λ) = (2, 21) and (2, 31) compared against the Molien– Weyl prediction. The pseudo–fermion supersymmetric energy is shown without adding the fermionic vacuum energy. 82 view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Gaussian BFSS3 model for (N,Λ) = (2, 21) and (2, 31) compared against the Molien– Weyl formula. The pseudo–fermion supersymmetric energy is shown with the addition of the fermionic vacuum energy. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Molien-Weyl (BFSS3), N=2, mf=1, mb=2/3, (µ=4) Theory (N=2) Molien-Weyl (BFSS2), N=2, mf=0, mb=2/3, (Λ=-4/9) Theory (N=2) E/N 2 T BFSS2 and BFSS3 via the Molien-Weyl formula… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Gaussian BFSS3 and BFSS2: Metropolis sampling vs. analytic Molien–Weyl evaluation. 83 view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The pure fermion theory BFSS0. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Bosonic Molien-Weyl energy is corrected by the fermion vacuum energy Gaussian Molien-Weyl energy is corrected by the sum of the boson and fermion vacuum energies Bosonic, µ=1.00µ1 Bosonic Molien-Weyl, µ=1.00µ1 SUSY BFSS3 (via pseudo-fermion), µ=1.00µ1 Gaussian BFSS3 (via Molien-Weyl), µ=1.00µ1 E/N 2 T=1/β d=2,N=2, Λ=24, µ1=6d1/3, rb… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The Bosonic Molien–Weyl theory is compared with the supersymmetric model, the view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The Bosonic Molien–Weyl theory is compared with the supersymmetric model, the view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Polyakov loop and extent of space for the BFSS view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study the singlet-sector structure of mass-deformed BFSS$_{d+1}$ matrix quantum mechanics by combining the large--$d$ Gaussian reduction with the Molien--Weyl projection. The Gaussian reduction captures the bulk matrix dynamics through a gauged harmonic oscillator, while the Molien--Weyl integral imposes the Gauss law and reorganizes the physical Hilbert space into holonomy-projected singlet excitations. We show that the very-low-temperature bosonic singlet spectrum is universally controlled by the quadratic Gram operators $\Tr(X_aX_b)$, whose number is $d(d+1)/2$. For $N=2$, this result is established by explicit residue computations and character methods; for $N>2$, it is supported by the character analysis. Thus the infrared spectrum begins as a collection of BFSS$_2$--like Gram towers, although higher invariant structures generally modify the full partition function. We also give a Hamiltonian derivation of the exceptional exact factorization at $(d,N)=(2,2)$, where the BFSS$_3$ singlet partition function equals the cube of the BFSS$_2$ one for all temperatures. This rigidity is special to the $SU(2)$ invariant tensor structure and explains why $d=1$ and $N=2$ are exceptional regimes without a deconfinement crossover. Finally, we extend the Gram-counting picture to supersymmetric BFSS/BMN models and indicate how the Molien--Weyl formulation can benchmark Monte Carlo simulations in both $X_a$-space and holonomy space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows that after large-d Gaussian reduction the low-T BFSS singlet spectrum is controlled by the quadratic Gram operators, with explicit N=2 results and an exact (2,2) factorization.

read the letter

The central result is that the very-low-temperature bosonic singlets are organized by the d(d+1)/2 quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_a X_b) once the model is reduced to a gauged harmonic oscillator. For N=2 this is backed by explicit residue and character calculations; for larger N the same pattern follows from the character analysis. They also derive the (d,N)=(2,2) factorization directly from the Hamiltonian, showing why that case stays rigid at all temperatures and lacks a deconfinement crossover. The Molien-Weyl integral is used in the standard way to project to singlets, and the low-T isolation of quadratic invariants follows because higher-degree operators sit at higher energies in the Gaussian Hamiltonian. This is a clean application of existing tools to the BFSS singlet problem and gives a concrete organizing principle for the IR spectrum. The extension to supersymmetric versions is sketched but not developed in detail. The main limitation is that the Gaussian reduction itself is a large-d approximation, so the N=2 results, while explicit, still sit inside that framework; one would want to see how sensitive the Gram control is when d is not large. For N>2 the support is character-based rather than fully explicit, which is reasonable but leaves room for later verification. The paper is aimed at people working on matrix models, BFSS/BMN spectra, and holographic confinement. It supplies enough concrete computations and a clear Hamiltonian argument to be worth a referee's time. I would send it for peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper combines large-d Gaussian reduction of mass-deformed BFSS matrix QM with Molien-Weyl projection to analyze the singlet sector. It claims that the very-low-T bosonic singlet spectrum is universally controlled by the quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_a X_b) (of which there are d(d+1)/2), with this established by explicit residue computations and character methods for N=2 and supported by character analysis for N>2. The IR spectrum is thus organized into BFSS_2-like Gram towers, while higher invariants affect the partition function only at higher T. A Hamiltonian derivation is given for the exact factorization BFSS_3 singlet partition function = (BFSS_2)^3 at (d,N)=(2,2) for all temperatures, and the approach is extended to supersymmetric BFSS/BMN models with suggestions for benchmarking Monte Carlo simulations.

Significance. If the results hold, the work provides a systematic, largely parameter-free framework for isolating the infrared singlet spectrum in these models, directly relevant to holographic and M-theory contexts. The explicit N=2 computations, the character-based support for higher N, and especially the Hamiltonian derivation of the (2,2) factorization (which explains the absence of deconfinement crossover in that case) are concrete strengths. The Gram-operator counting offers falsifiable predictions for low-T spectra and a potential benchmark for numerics in both X-space and holonomy space.

major comments (1)

[Gaussian reduction and low-T analysis] The central claim that higher-degree invariants enter only at higher energies (and thus do not affect the very-low-T Gram-controlled spectrum) relies on the Gaussian Hamiltonian after large-d reduction; a more explicit bound or scaling argument showing the energy gap to the first non-quadratic operator would strengthen the separation of scales for general N.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract and introduction] Notation for BFSS_d and BFSS_2 should be defined once at first use and used consistently; the title uses BFSS_2--Factorization while the abstract refers to BFSS$_2$--like towers.
[Character methods] The character analysis for N>2 would benefit from a short table or explicit low-lying state count for at least one additional small N (e.g., N=3, d=2) to illustrate the Gram-tower structure before the general statement.
[Introduction] A brief comparison to existing literature on Molien-Weyl applications to matrix models or singlet counting would help situate the novelty of the combined Gaussian+projection approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive suggestion. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Gaussian reduction and low-T analysis] The central claim that higher-degree invariants enter only at higher energies (and thus do not affect the very-low-T Gram-controlled spectrum) relies on the Gaussian Hamiltonian after large-d reduction; a more explicit bound or scaling argument showing the energy gap to the first non-quadratic operator would strengthen the separation of scales for general N.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. For N=2 the explicit residue and character computations already establish that the spectrum is governed by the quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_a X_b) at low T, with higher invariants entering only at parametrically higher energies. For N>2 the character analysis similarly isolates the leading low-T contributions to the d(d+1)/2 quadratic operators. We agree that an explicit scaling bound would make the separation of scales more transparent for general N. In the revised manuscript we will add a short scaling argument in the large-d Gaussian reduction section, showing that the first non-quadratic invariants are suppressed by O(1/d) factors in the low-temperature expansion of the Molien-Weyl integral. This will quantify the energy gap without altering the existing results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper combines the standard large-d Gaussian reduction (mapping to a gauged harmonic oscillator) with the Molien-Weyl integral for singlet projection. The claim that low-T bosonic singlets are controlled by the quadratic Gram operators Tr(X_a X_b) follows directly from the quadratic form of the approximated Hamiltonian, where higher invariants enter only at higher energies; this is an explicit energy-hierarchy argument, not a fit or redefinition. For N=2 the result is backed by direct residue and character computations, and for N>2 by character analysis. The (2,2) factorization is obtained from a separate Hamiltonian derivation exploiting SU(2) tensor structure. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work; the derivation remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis assumes the applicability of the large-d limit and Gaussian approximation to the BFSS model dynamics, along with the standard use of Molien-Weyl for singlet projection in quantum mechanics.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Large-d limit allows Gaussian reduction to a gauged harmonic oscillator for the matrix dynamics.
This approximation is central to capturing the bulk behavior before applying the Molien-Weyl singlet projection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5597 in / 1569 out tokens · 81930 ms · 2026-05-08T17:25:09.873808+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,

L. Brink, J. H. Schwarz and J. Scherk, “Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B121, 77-92 (1977)

1977
[2]

Fierz Identities for Real Clifford Algebras and the Number of Supercharges,

M. Baake, M. Reinicke and V. Rittenberg, “Fierz Identities for Real Clifford Algebras and the Number of Supercharges,” J. Math. Phys.26, 1070 (1985)

1985
[3]

’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974)

1974
[4]

Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

work page Pith review arXiv
[5]

Susskind,The World as a Hologram, J

L. Susskind,The World as a Hologram, J. Math. Phys.36, 6377 (1995)

1995
[6]

M Theory As A Matrix Model: A Conjecture

T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D55, 5112-5128 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9610043 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[7]

Witten,Bound States of Strings andp-Branes, Nucl

E. Witten,Bound States of Strings andp-Branes, Nucl. Phys. B460, 335 (1996)

1996
[8]

Itzhaki, J

N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Supergravity and the LargeNLimit of Theories with Sixteen Supercharges, Phys. Rev. D58, 046004 (1998)

1998
[9]

Polchinski,Dirichlet Branes and Ramond–Ramond Charges, Phys

J. Polchinski,Dirichlet Branes and Ramond–Ramond Charges, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4724 (1995)

1995
[10]

Cremmer, B

E. Cremmer, B. Julia, and J. Scherk,Supergravity Theory in Eleven Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B76, 409 (1978)

1978
[11]

String theory dynamics in various dimensions,

E. Witten, “String theory dynamics in various dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B443, 85 (1995)

1995
[12]

Quantum M-wave and Black 0-brane,

Y. Hyakutake, “Quantum M-wave and Black 0-brane,” JHEP09, 075 (2014) [arXiv:1407.6023 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2014
[13]

Higher derivative corrections to eleven dimensional super- gravity via local supersymmetry,

Y. Hyakutake and S. Ogushi, “Higher derivative corrections to eleven dimensional super- gravity via local supersymmetry,” JHEP02, 068 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0601092 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2006
[14]

Hoppe,Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-Dimensional Bound State Problem, Ph.D

J. Hoppe,Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-Dimensional Bound State Problem, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (1982)

1982
[15]

Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization, andSU(∞),

J. Hoppe, “Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization, andSU(∞),” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4, 5235 (1989)

1989
[16]

de Wit, J

B. de Wit, J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai,On the Quantum Mechanics of Supermembranes, Nucl. Phys. B305, 545 (1988)

1988
[17]

Vacuum States in Supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein Theory,

J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Vacuum States in Supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein Theory,” Phys. Lett. B134, 194-196 (1984) 86

1984
[18]

A New maximally supersymmetric background of IIB superstring theory,

M. Blau, J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, C. Hull and G. Papadopoulos, “A New maximally supersymmetric background of IIB superstring theory,” JHEP01, 047 (2002) [arXiv:hep- th/0110242 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2002
[19]

Azeyanagi, M

T. Azeyanagi, M. Hanada, T. Hirata and H. Shimada,On the Shape of a D-Brane Bound State and Its Topology Change, J. High Energy Phys.0903, 121
[20]

Zwiebach,A First Course in String Theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

B. Zwiebach,A First Course in String Theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

2009
[21]

Becker, M

K. Becker, M. Becker and J. H. Schwarz,String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Intro- duction(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

2006
[22]

J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNLimit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys.38, 1113 (1999)], arXiv:hep- th/9711200

work page arXiv 1998
[23]

S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Theory Correlators from Non- Critical String Theory, Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802109

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998
[24]

Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter Space and Holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998
[25]

Confinement of Quarks,

K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of Quarks,” Phys. Rev. D10, 2445-2459 (1974)

1974
[26]

Black hole thermodynamics from simulations of lattice Yang–Mills theory,

Catterall, S. and Wiseman, T., “Black hole thermodynamics from simulations of lattice Yang–Mills theory,”Phys. Rev. D78, 041502 (2008)

2008
[27]

Monte Carlo stud- ies of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics with sixteen supercharges at finite tem- perature,

Anagnostopoulos, K. N., Hanada, M., Nishimura, J. and Takeuchi, S., “Monte Carlo stud- ies of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics with sixteen supercharges at finite tem- perature,”Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 021601 (2008)

2008
[28]

Holographic description of quantum black hole on a computer,

Hanada, M., Hyakutake, Y., Ishiki, G. and Nishimura, J., “Holographic description of quantum black hole on a computer,”Science344, 882 (2014)

2014
[29]

Numerical tests of the gauge/gravity duality conjecture for D0-branes at finite temperature and finiteN,

Hanada, M., Hyakutake, Y., Ishiki, G. and Nishimura, J., “Numerical tests of the gauge/gravity duality conjecture for D0-branes at finite temperature and finiteN,”Phys. Rev. D94, 086010 (2016)

2016
[30]

Filev and D

V. G. Filev and D. O’Connor, “The BFSS model on the lattice,” JHEP1605, 167 (2016) [arXiv:1506.01366 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2016
[31]

Black hole thermodynamics from calculations in strongly coupled gauge theory,

Kabat, D. N., Lifschytz, G. and Lowe, D. A., “Black hole thermodynamics from calculations in strongly coupled gauge theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1426 (2001). 87

2001
[32]

Higher derivative corrections to black hole thermodynamics from supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics,

Hanada, M., Hyakutake, Y., Nishimura, J. and Takeuchi, S., “Higher derivative corrections to black hole thermodynamics from supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 191602 (2009)

2009
[33]

Quantum near-horizon geometry of a black 0-brane,

Y. Hyakutake, “Quantum near-horizon geometry of a black 0-brane,”Progr. Theor. Exp. Phys.2014, 033B04 (2014)

2014
[34]

Hanada,What Lattice Theorists Can Do for Superstring/M-Theory, Int

M. Hanada,What Lattice Theorists Can Do for Superstring/M-Theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31, 1643006 (2016)

2016
[35]

Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,

D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena and H. S. Nastase, “Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,” JHEP04, 013 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0202021 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2002
[36]

Massive super Yang-Mills quantum mechanics: Classification and the relation to supermembrane,

N. Kim and J. H. Park, “Massive super Yang-Mills quantum mechanics: Classification and the relation to supermembrane,” Nucl. Phys. B759, 249–282 (2006) [arXiv:hep- th/0607005]

work page arXiv 2006
[37]

Noncriticalosp(1|2,R) M-theory matrix model with an arbitrary time- dependent cosmological constant,

J. H. Park, “Noncriticalosp(1|2,R) M-theory matrix model with an arbitrary time- dependent cosmological constant,” Nucl. Phys. B745, 123–141 (2006) [arXiv:hep- th/0510070]

work page arXiv 2006
[38]

Dielectric-Branes

R. C. Myers, “Dielectric-branes,” JHEP12, 022 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9910053 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[39]

Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries,

H. Lin, O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena, “Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geome- tries,” JHEP10, 025 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/025 [arXiv:hep-th/0409174 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/025 2004
[40]

The non-perturbative phase diagram of the BMN matrix model,

Y. Asano, V. G. Filev, S. Kov´ aˇ cik and D. O’Connor, “The non-perturbative phase diagram of the BMN matrix model,” JHEP07, 152 (2018) [arXiv:1805.05314 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2018
[41]

The Confining Transition in the Bosonic BMN Matrix Model,

Y. Asano, S. Kov´ aˇ cik and D. O’Connor, “The Confining Transition in the Bosonic BMN Matrix Model,” JHEP06, 174 (2020) [arXiv:2001.03749 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

D. A. Cox, J. B. Little and D. O’Shea,Using Algebraic Geometry, 2nd ed., Springer, New York (2005), pp. 295–298

2005
[43]

Gauged permutation invariant matrix quantum me- chanics: path integrals,

D. O’Connor and S. Ramgoolam, “Gauged permutation invariant matrix quantum me- chanics: path integrals,” JHEP04, 080 (2024) [arXiv:2312.12397 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Permutation invariant matrix quantum thermody- namics and negative specific heat capacities in large N systems,

D. O’Connor and S. Ramgoolam, “Permutation invariant matrix quantum thermody- namics and negative specific heat capacities in large N systems,” JHEP12, 161 (2024) [arXiv:2405.13150 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

Phases of one dimensional large N gauge theory in a 1/D expansion,

G. Mandal, M. Mahato and T. Morita, “Phases of one dimensional large N gauge theory in a 1/D expansion,” JHEP1002(2010) 034 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)034 [arXiv:0910.4526 [hep-th]]. 88

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2010)034 2010
[46]

Phases of a two dimensional large N gauge theory on a torus,

G. Mandal and T. Morita, “Phases of a two dimensional large N gauge theory on a torus,” Phys. Rev. D84, 085007 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.085007 [arXiv:1103.1558 [hep- th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.085007 2011
[47]

Kabat, G

D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, “Black hole thermodynamics from calculations in strongly coupled gauge theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16, 856 (2001) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1426 (2001)] [hep-th/0007051]

work page arXiv 2001
[48]

Black hole entropy from nonperturbative gauge theory,

D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, “Black hole entropy from nonperturbative gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D64, 124015 (2001) [hep-th/0105171]

work page arXiv 2001
[49]

Phase structure of matrix quantum mechan- ics at finite temperature,

N. Kawahara, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, “Phase structure of matrix quantum mechan- ics at finite temperature,” JHEP0710, 097 (2007) [arXiv:0706.3517 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2007
[50]

Possible Third Order Phase Transition in the Large N Lattice Gauge Theory,

D. J. Gross and E. Witten, “Possible Third Order Phase Transition in the Large N Lattice Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D21, 446 (1980)

1980
[51]

N = Infinity Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,

S. R. Wadia, “N = Infinity Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,” Phys. Lett.93B, 403 (1980)

1980
[52]

Black hole-black string phase transitions in thermal 1+1 dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on a circle,

O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla and T. Wiseman, “Black hole-black string phase transitions in thermal 1+1 dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on a circle,” Class. Quant. Grav.21, 5169-5192 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0406210 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2004
[53]

The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,

O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8, 603 (2004) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2004.v8.n4.a1 [hep-th/0310285]

work page doi:10.4310/atmp.2004.v8.n4.a1 2004
[54]

Finite temperature effective action, AdS(5) black holes, and 1/N expansion,

L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, H. Liu and S. Wadia, “Finite temperature effective action, AdS(5) black holes, and 1/N expansion,” Phys. Rev. D71, 124023 (2005) [hep-th/0502227]

work page arXiv 2005
[55]

The QM/NCG Correspondence,

B. Ydri, “The QM/NCG Correspondence,” doi:10.1142/9789811270437 0027 [arXiv:2211.00339 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/9789811270437
[56]

Quantized noncommutative geometry from multitrace matrix models,

B. Ydri, R. Khaled and C. Soudani, “Quantized noncommutative geometry from multitrace matrix models,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A37, no.10, 2250052 (2022) doi:10.1142/S0217751X2250052X [arXiv:2110.06677 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x2250052x 2022
[57]

Two approaches to quantum gravity and M-(atrix) theory at large number of dimensions,

B. Ydri, “Two approaches to quantum gravity and M-(atrix) theory at large number of dimensions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A36, no.31n32, 2150234 (2021) doi:10.1142/S0217751X21502341 [arXiv:2007.04488 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x21502341 2021
[58]

Weyl,The Classical Groups: Their Invariants and Representations, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 1946

H. Weyl,The Classical Groups: Their Invariants and Representations, Princeton Univer- sity Press, Princeton, 1946. 89

1946
[59]

Procesi,Lie Groups: An Approach through Invariants and Representations, Universi- text, Springer, New York, 2007

C. Procesi,Lie Groups: An Approach through Invariants and Representations, Universi- text, Springer, New York, 2007

2007
[60]

A Large-N Reduced Model as Superstring

N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa and A. Tsuchiya, “A Large N reduced model as superstring,” Nucl. Phys. B498, 467-491 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9612115 [hep-th]]

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[61]

O’Connor, private communication

D. O’Connor, private communication
[62]

Ydri,Work in final stage of preparation

B. Ydri,Work in final stage of preparation. 90