pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05307 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· hep-lat· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Perturbative, Nonperturbative and Exact Aspects of Crystalline Phases in the Gross-Neveu Model

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-lathep-ph
keywords Gross-Neveu modelcrystalline phasechemical potentialinhomogeneous phaselarge N limitintegrabilitychiral condensatebound states
0
0 comments X

The pith

At large chemical potential the Gross-Neveu model develops an inhomogeneous phase in which a-particle bound states condense and a chiral condensate oscillates periodically.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the crystalline phase of the O(2N) Gross-Neveu model when a chemical potential is introduced for a ≤ N-2 fermions. Three independent methods—perturbative quantum field theory, semiclassical large-N analysis, and integrability techniques—are applied and shown to agree. At sufficiently high chemical potential an inhomogeneous phase appears in which a-particle bound states condense; at large N this phase is realized as a periodically oscillating chiral condensate. The conventional dynamical scale Λ is replaced by two new scales Λ_n and Λ_c that govern the mass gaps of neutral and charged excitations and all nonperturbative corrections to the free energy and the mean-field profile.

Core claim

In the O(2N) Gross-Neveu model with chemical potential h for a ≤ N-2 fermions, a sufficiently large h triggers an inhomogeneous phase in which a-particle bound states condense; at large N this phase corresponds to a periodically oscillating chiral condensate. The usual dynamically generated scale Λ is replaced by two new dynamically generated scales Λ_n and Λ_c. These scales set the mass gaps of neutral and charged excitations above the inhomogeneous vacuum, control nonperturbative corrections to the free energy, and parametrize the oscillatory profile of the mean field.

What carries the argument

The inhomogeneous vacuum with a periodically oscillating chiral condensate, confirmed by perturbative QFT, semiclassical large-N analysis, and integrability, which introduces two distinct dynamical scales Λ_n (neutral) and Λ_c (charged) in place of the single scale Λ.

If this is right

  • Nonperturbative corrections to the free energy are parametrized by the two scales Λ_n and Λ_c rather than a single Λ.
  • Neutral excitations acquire a mass gap set by Λ_n while charged excitations acquire a gap set by Λ_c.
  • The mean-field profile oscillates with a spatial period and amplitude fixed by Λ_n and Λ_c.
  • Multiple nonperturbative effects in the theory are simultaneously governed by the pair of scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-scale structure may generalize to other integrable models with chemical potential and bound-state condensation.
  • At finite N the separation between neutral and charged gaps could receive corrections that are still controlled by the same two scales.
  • The consistency across perturbative, semiclassical and exact methods suggests that similar crystalline phases exist in related four-fermion theories.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical large-N limit and integrability methods remain valid and mutually consistent for a ≤ N-2 without uncontrolled corrections that would change the two-scale structure or the separation of neutral and charged gaps.

What would settle it

A direct computation or lattice simulation of the free energy and excitation gaps in the high-h regime that finds only a single dynamical scale controlling both neutral and charged sectors instead of two separate scales Λ_n and Λ_c.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05307 by Francesco Benini, Marco Serone, Ohad Mamroud, Tomas Reis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic depiction of the RG flow with chemical potential. We start with a small view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The five diagrams that contribute to the four-point function at 1-loop. view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The different constant saddles (left) and their action (right) as a function of view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Γ (2)(h, σ, q) for y = 6/7, m = 1 and h = 0.82, which satisfies h > h∗ such that σ− is the global minimum. The black line is Γ (2)(h, σ0, q) and the blue lines represent Γ (2)(h, σ−, q). The dashed line marks q = 2q h 2 − σ 2 −, around which Γ (2)(h, σ−, q) signals an instability. which is stable for all momenta q. It is also useful to observe that for h < σ the function is monotonic in q ≥ 0 and Γ (2)(h <… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the functions hy (orange) where the constant saddles σ± appear, hpt (dashed) equal to the mass/charge ratio and where the actual phase transition occurs, and h∗(y) (black) where the constant saddle σ− becomes subdominant with respect to σ0. The nature of the instability, however, does offer clues about the inhomogeneous solutions we will find in the next section. At large h, the unstable… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dispersion relation for two values of h and y = 2/3, in units where Λ = 1. Obtained from (3.49) using the parameters of the physical solutions. the bands are ε ∈ [m, 1] ∪ [1 + m,∞] . (3.52) Note that the gap between ω = 0 and the bottom of the lower band vanishes when b → K(m), and the gap between the two bands vanishes when m → 0. The lower band shrinks to a point in the limit m → 1. For later use, we def… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plot of σ(x) with h = 0.97 Λ for different values of y. The dotted line is the single rank-a particle solution found in [32]. 3.4.2 Low-density limit Let us compute the solution in the limit m → 1. We keep 0 < y < 1 fixed and, as we will see, this means that also b remains fixed. We use the following limits: sn(b|m) → tanh b , cn(b|m), dn(b|m) → cosh−1 b , q2 = 1 − m dn2 b → 0 K(m) → ∞ , (1 − m) K(m) → 0 ,… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plot of σ(x) with h = 1.0001 hpt for different values of y, with hpt defined in (3.89). The dotted line is the single rank-a particle solution found in [32]. This is the minimal value of the chemical potential in the low-density limit of the condensed phase. This result is consistent with the condensation of the rank-a bound state since it corresponds precisely to the mass-to-charge ratio (at large N), as … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Plot of Φ(h) at finite L for different values of r (colored full lines) compared with Φ(h) for the infinite-volume solution (black dashed line) and with the action for σ = m (black solid line). Plotted with y = 1/3 and Λ = 1. in the infinite-volume limit.24 3.4.3 High-density limit Next, consider the limit m → 0 with y fixed. In this limit, it is convenient to re-parametrize b in terms of ν as follows: b =… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plot of σ(x) with h = 1.4 Λ for different values of y. The dotted line is the limiting solution (3.102). so that σ(x) ≈ Λn + Λc sin(2hx) . (3.102) In view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Solutions to the integral equations for N = 6 and a = 4 at h/m = √ e. The purple line correspond to the background solutions χa (left) and ϵa (right). The other full lines correspond to the probe solution: charged fermions χ1/ϵ1 (blue), charged hole χa−1/ϵa−1 (cyan) and neutral fermions χa+1/ϵa+1 (red). The vertical dashed lines are at ±B. B ∼ log h) and then do a binomial search for the value of B that l… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sequences L (b) k for charged excitations (b = 1) and neutral excitations (b = a + 1) for N = 5 and two values of a. The blue dots are the sequence and the orange dots are the third Richardson transform. We use u0 = √ e and u = e 1/8 . The dashed line is 2N−2 a and the dotted line is N−1 N−1−a , verifying (4.110). -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Dispersion relation for background excitations for view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Plot of χa and ϵa for multiple values of N with a = N/2. The analytical large N solution is marked with a dashed line. Moreover, ω(p) is always linear near the origin, because ϵ ′ χ (B) is finite and non-vanishing. Finally, since ϵ ′ (0) = 0, we get a local maximum at the edges. Thus the profile of view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Plot of χ1 and ϵ1 for multiple values of N with a = N/2. The analytical large N solution is marked with a dashed line. 1 2 3 4 5 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparison between the free energy computed using the BA for two values of view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Dispersion relation for probes of different view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Dispersion relation for probes at different values of view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the crystalline phase of the $O(2N)$ Gross--Neveu model with a chemical potential for $a \leq N-2$ of the fermions. We analyze the problem in three independent ways: using perturbative QFT methods, a semiclassical large $N$ analysis, and integrability techniques (both at finite and large $N$). The resulting picture is consistent across all three approaches: at sufficiently large chemical potential $h$, an inhomogeneous phase emerges in which $a$-particle bound states condense and which, at large $N$, corresponds to a periodically oscillating chiral condensate. In this phase, the usual dynamically generated scale $\Lambda$ is replaced by two new dynamically generated scales $\Lambda_{\rm n}$ and $\Lambda_{\rm c}$. These two scales govern the multiple nonperturbative effects in the theory, corresponding in particular to the mass gaps of neutral and charged excitations on top of the inhomogeneous vacuum, respectively. They also control the nonperturbative corrections to observables such as the free energy and provide the parameters characterizing the oscillatory profile of the mean field at large $N$. In this paper, we provide the necessary details of each of the three methods, thereby complementing the results announced in a previous, shorter publication.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the crystalline phase of the O(2N) Gross-Neveu model with chemical potential for a ≤ N-2 fermions. Using perturbative QFT methods, semiclassical large-N analysis, and integrability techniques (at finite and large N), it finds that at sufficiently large chemical potential h an inhomogeneous phase emerges in which a-particle bound states condense; at large N this corresponds to a periodically oscillating chiral condensate. In this phase the usual dynamical scale Λ is replaced by two new scales Λ_n and Λ_c that govern the mass gaps of neutral and charged excitations, control nonperturbative corrections to the free energy, and parametrize the oscillatory mean-field profile.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a robust, multi-method characterization of the inhomogeneous phase and the emergence of two dynamically generated scales in place of the single scale Λ. The explicit agreement among perturbative, semiclassical, and integrability approaches on the two-scale structure, the identification of neutral versus charged gaps, and the oscillatory condensate profile constitutes a notable strength, especially given the model's integrability. This advances the understanding of crystalline phases in 2d fermionic QFTs with chemical potential and provides concrete, falsifiable predictions for the scales Λ_n and Λ_c.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the three methods are independent and yield a consistent picture; a short dedicated subsection summarizing the cross-checks (e.g., matching values of Λ_n/Λ_c extracted from each method) would make the mutual consistency more immediately verifiable for readers.
  2. Notation for the two scales Λ_n and Λ_c is introduced in the abstract and used throughout; an early, self-contained definition paragraph that distinguishes their physical roles (neutral vs. charged gaps) would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the detailed summary of our results, and the recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the consistency across perturbative, semiclassical, and integrability methods, as well as the emergence of the two new scales Λ_n and Λ_c, were highlighted as strengths.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; three independent methods yield consistent two-scale structure

full rationale

The paper derives the inhomogeneous crystalline phase and the replacement of the single scale Λ by two new scales Λ_n and Λ_c through three explicitly independent methods (perturbative QFT, semiclassical large-N, and integrability at finite and large N). No equation or claim reduces a derived quantity to a fitted parameter or self-defined input by construction; the two-scale structure and the identification of neutral/charged gaps emerge from the mutual consistency of the three analyses rather than being presupposed. The reference to a prior shorter publication serves only to announce results whose details are supplied here, without load-bearing reliance on unverified self-citation. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard definition of the O(2N) Gross-Neveu model in 1+1 dimensions and the usual large-N and integrability assumptions of the field; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard axioms of quantum field theory in 1+1 dimensions, including the existence of a dynamically generated scale Λ in the Gross-Neveu model.
    Invoked throughout the description of the model and its phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1395 out tokens · 90109 ms · 2026-05-08T17:13:23.795106+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gross and A

    D.J. Gross and A. Neveu,Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Asymptotically Free Field Theories,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 3235. 2, 17

  2. [2]

    Campbell and A.R

    D.K. Campbell and A.R. Bishop,Soliton excitations in polyacetylene and relativistic field theory models,Nucl. Phys. B200(1982) 297. 2

  3. [3]

    Thies,From relativistic quantum fields to condensed matter and back again: Updating the Gross–Neveu phase diagram,J

    M. Thies,From relativistic quantum fields to condensed matter and back again: Updating the Gross–Neveu phase diagram,J. Phys. A39(2006) 12707 [hep-th/0601049]. 2, 23

  4. [4]

    Zamolodchikov and A.B

    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov,FactorizedS-matrices in two-dimensions as the exact solutions of certain relativistic quantum field theory models,Annals Phys.120 (1979) 253. 2

  5. [5]

    Karowski and H.J

    M. Karowski and H.J. Thun,CompleteS-matrix of theO(2N)Gross–Neveu model,Nucl. Phys. B190(1981) 61. 2

  6. [7]

    Phys.B367(1991) 123

    The Thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,Nucl. Phys.B367(1991) 123. 2, 3, 4, 39, 41, 45

  7. [8]

    Wolff,The phase diagram of the infinite N Gross-Neveu model at finite temperature and chemical potential,Phys

    U. Wolff,The phase diagram of the infinite N Gross-Neveu model at finite temperature and chemical potential,Phys. Lett. B157(1985) 303. 3

  8. [9]

    Barducci, R

    A. Barducci, R. Casalbuoni, M. Modugno, G. Pettini and R. Gatto,Thermodynamics of the massive Gross-Neveu model,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 3042 [hep-th/9406117]. 3

  9. [10]

    Schön and M

    V. Schön and M. Thies,Emergence of Skyrme crystal in Gross–Neveu and ’t Hooft models at finite density,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 096002 [hep-th/0003195]. 3, 4, 5

  10. [11]

    Thies and K

    M. Thies and K. Urlichs,Revised phase diagram of the Gross–Neveu model,Phys. Rev. D 67(2003) 125015 [hep-th/0302092]. 3, 4, 5, 23

  11. [12]

    Schnetz, M

    O. Schnetz, M. Thies and K. Urlichs,Phase diagram of the Gross–Neveu model: Exact results and condensed matter precursors,Annals Phys.314(2004) 425 [hep-th/0402014]. 3, 4, 5, 23, 61

  12. [13]

    Başar, G.V

    G. Başar, G.V. Dunne and M. Thies,Inhomogeneous condensates in the thermodynamics of the chiral NJL2 model,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 105012 [0903.1868]. 3, 4, 61

  13. [14]

    Melin, Y

    V. Melin, Y. Sekiguchi, P. Wiegmann and K. Zarembo,Peierls transition in Gross–Neveu model from Bethe ansatz,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 101601 [2404.07307]. 3, 4, 6, 39, 45, 47, 49

  14. [15]

    Ciccone, L

    R. Ciccone, L. Di Pietro and M. Serone,Inhomogeneous phase of the Chiral Gross–Neveu model,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 071603 [2203.07451]. 3 83

  15. [16]

    Ciccone, L

    R. Ciccone, L. Di Pietro and M. Serone,Anomalies and persistent order in the chiral Gross–Neveu model,JHEP02(2024) 211 [2312.13756]. 3

  16. [17]

    Thies,Peierls instability for systems with several Fermi surfaces: An example from the chiral Gross-Neveu model,Phys

    M. Thies,Peierls instability for systems with several Fermi surfaces: An example from the chiral Gross-Neveu model,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 036016 [2511.04212]. 3, 61

  17. [18]

    Azaria, R.M

    P. Azaria, R.M. Konik, P. Lecheminant, T. Palmai, G. Takacs and A.M. Tsvelik,Particle Formation and Ordering in Strongly Correlated Fermionic Systems: Solving a Model of Quantum Chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 045003 [1601.02979]. 3

  18. [19]

    Lajer, R

    M. Lajer, R.M. Konik, R.D. Pisarski and A.M. Tsvelik,When cold, dense quarks in 1+1 and 3+1 dimensions are not a Fermi liquid,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 054035 [2112.10238]. 3

  19. [20]

    Polyakov and P.B

    A.M. Polyakov and P.B. Wiegmann,Theory of nonabelian Goldstone bosons in two dimensions,Phys. Lett. B131(1983) 121. 3, 37

  20. [21]

    Forgacs, F

    P. Forgacs, F. Niedermayer and P. Weisz,The Exact mass gap of the Gross-Neveu model

  21. [22]

    Phys.B367(1991) 144

    The 1/N expansion,Nucl. Phys.B367(1991) 144. 3, 4, 39

  22. [23]

    Volin,From the mass gap inO(N)to the non-Borel-summability inO(3)andO(4) sigma-models,Phys

    D. Volin,From the mass gap inO(N)to the non-Borel-summability inO(3)andO(4) sigma-models,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 105008 [0904.2744]. 3, 41, 57

  23. [24]

    Mariño and T

    M. Mariño and T. Reis,Renormalons in integrable field theories,JHEP04(2020) 160 [1909.12134]. 3, 41, 46, 57

  24. [25]

    Di Pietro, M

    L. Di Pietro, M. Mariño, G. Sberveglieri and M. Serone,Resurgence and1/Nexpansion in integrable field theories,JHEP10(2021) 166 [2108.02647]. 3, 46

  25. [26]

    Mariño, R

    M. Mariño, R. Miravitllas and T. Reis,New renormalons from analytic trans-series,JHEP 08(2022) 279 [2111.11951]. 3, 4, 6, 41, 44, 45, 46, 53, 60

  26. [27]

    Bajnok, J

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog and I. Vona,The full analytic trans-series in integrable field theories, Phys. Lett. B844(2023) 138075 [2212.09416]. 3, 41, 46

  27. [28]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 385. 3

  28. [29]

    Benfatto and G

    G. Benfatto and G. Gallavotti,Renormalization-group approach to the theory of the Fermi surface,Phys. Rev. B42(1990) 9967. 4

  29. [30]

    Polchinski, Effective Field Theory and the Fermi Sur- face (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9210046

    J. Polchinski,Effective field theory and the Fermi surface, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp. 0235–276, 6, 1992 [hep-th/9210046]. 4

  30. [31]

    Evans, S.D.H

    N.J. Evans, S.D.H. Hsu and M. Schwetz,An Effective field theory approach to color superconductivity at high quark density,Nucl. Phys. B551(1999) 275 [hep-ph/9808444]. 4 84

  31. [32]

    Schäfer and F

    T. Schäfer and F. Wilczek,High density quark matter and the renormalization group in QCD with two and three flavors,Phys. Lett. B450(1999) 325 [hep-ph/9810509]. 4

  32. [33]

    Koenigstein, L

    A. Koenigstein, L. Pannullo, S. Rechenberger, M.J. Steil and M. Winstel,Detecting inhomogeneous chiral condensation from the bosonic two-point function in the (1 + 1)-dimensional Gross–Neveu model in the mean-field approximation*,J. Phys. A55 (2022) 375402 [2112.07024]. 5, 20, 21, 22

  33. [34]

    Dashen, B

    R.F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu,Semiclassical bound states in an asymptotically free theory,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 2443. 5, 26, 32, 33, 34

  34. [35]

    Mermin and H

    N.D. Mermin and H. Wagner,Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-dimensional or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models,Phys. Rev. Lett.17 (1966) 1133. 6

  35. [36]

    Coleman,There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,Commun

    S.R. Coleman,There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys. 31(1973) 259. 6

  36. [37]

    Thies,Analytical solution of the Gross–Neveu model at finite density,Phys

    M. Thies,Analytical solution of the Gross–Neveu model at finite density,Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 067703 [hep-th/0308164]. 6, 23, 30, 32

  37. [38]

    Schnetz, M

    O. Schnetz, M. Thies and K. Urlichs,Full phase diagram of the massive Gross–Neveu model,Annals Phys.321(2006) 2604 [hep-th/0511206]. 6, 17, 23, 25, 26, 28, 60, 61, 78, 80

  38. [39]

    Benini, O

    F. Benini, O. Mamroud, T. Reis and M. Serone,Condensates, Crystals, and Renormalons in the Gross-Neveu Model at Finite Density,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 141601 [2505.23388]. 6, 10, 14, 44

  39. [40]

    Alberte and A

    L. Alberte and A. Nicolis,Spontaneously broken boosts and the Goldstone continuum, JHEP07(2020) 076 [2001.06024]. 11

  40. [41]

    Schnetz, M

    O. Schnetz, M. Thies and K. Urlichs,The Phase diagram of the massive Gross-Neveu model, revisited,hep-th/0507120. 17, 23, 26

  41. [42]

    Thies and K

    M. Thies and K. Urlichs,From non-degenerate conducting polymers to dense matter in the massive Gross–Neveu model,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 105008 [hep-th/0505024]. 23, 75, 76

  42. [43]

    Thies,Nonperturbative phase boundaries in the Gross-Neveu model from a stability analysis,Phys

    M. Thies,Nonperturbative phase boundaries in the Gross-Neveu model from a stability analysis,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096012 [2408.09803]. 23

  43. [44]

    Feinberg,All about the static fermion bags in the Gross-Neveu model,Annals Phys.309 (2004) 166 [hep-th/0305240]

    J. Feinberg,All about the static fermion bags in the Gross-Neveu model,Annals Phys.309 (2004) 166 [hep-th/0305240]. 26

  44. [45]

    Saxena and A.R

    A. Saxena and A.R. Bishop,Multipolaron solutions of the gross-neveu field theory: Toda potential and doped polymers,Phys. Rev. A44(1991) R2251. 26

  45. [46]

    Dunne and J

    G.V. Dunne and J. Feinberg,Self isospectral periodic potentials and supersymmetric quantum mechanics,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 1271 [hep-th/9706012]. 26, 61 85

  46. [47]

    Fendley,Integrable sigma models and perturbed coset models,JHEP05(2001) 050 [hep-th/0101034]

    P. Fendley,Integrable sigma models and perturbed coset models,JHEP05(2001) 050 [hep-th/0101034]. 38

  47. [48]

    Serone,Lectures on Resurgence in Integrable Field Theories,2405.02224

    M. Serone,Lectures on Resurgence in Integrable Field Theories,2405.02224. 39, 46

  48. [49]

    Bajnok, J

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog and I. Vona,The complete trans-series for conserved charges in integrable field theories,Annals Phys.481(2025) 170152 [2501.16435]. 39, 41, 46

  49. [50]

    Melin,Integrability and thermodynamics of the gross-neveu model, 2023

    V. Melin,Integrability and thermodynamics of the gross-neveu model, 2023. 40

  50. [51]

    Zamolodchikov,Mass scale in the sine-Gordon model and its reductions,Int

    A.B. Zamolodchikov,Mass scale in the sine-Gordon model and its reductions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10(1995) 1125. 41, 44

  51. [52]

    Hasenfratz, M

    P. Hasenfratz, M. Maggiore and F. Niedermayer,The Exact mass gap of the O(3) and O(4) nonlinear sigma models in d = 2,Phys. Lett.B245(1990) 522. 41

  52. [53]

    Reis,On the resurgence of renormalons in integrable theories, Ph.D

    T. Reis,On the resurgence of renormalons in integrable theories, Ph.D. thesis, U. of Geneva, 2022.2209.15386. 41, 46

  53. [54]

    Marino, R

    M. Marino, R. Miravitllas and T. Reis,On the Structure of Trans-Series in Quantum Field Theory,SIGMA21(2025) 065 [2302.08363]. 43, 46

  54. [55]

    Fateev, E

    V.A. Fateev, E. Onofri and A.B. Zamolodchikov,Integrable deformations of theO(3) sigma model. The sausage model,Nucl. Phys. B406(1993) 521. 44

  55. [56]

    Saleur and B

    H. Saleur and B. Pozsgay,Scattering and duality in the 2 dimensional OSP(2|2) Gross Neveu and sigma models,JHEP02(2010) 008 [0910.0637]. 44

  56. [57]

    Sauzin,Introduction to 1-summability and resurgence,1405.0356

    D. Sauzin,Introduction to 1-summability and resurgence,1405.0356. 46

  57. [58]

    Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,Annals Phys

    D. Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,Annals Phys.409(2019) 167914 [1411.3585]. 46

  58. [59]

    Aniceto, G

    I. Aniceto, G. Başar and R. Schiappa,A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymptotics,Phys. Rept.809(2019) 1 [1802.10441]. 46

  59. [60]

    Finite-gap potentials as a semiclassical limit of the thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz

    V. Melin, P. Wiegmann and K. Zarembo,Finite-gap potentials as a semiclassical limit of the thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz,2512.19655. 47, 59

  60. [61]

    Abbott, Z

    M.C. Abbott, Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, Á. Hegedús and S. Sadeghian,Resurgence in the O(4) sigma model,JHEP05(2021) 253 [2011.12254]. 53

  61. [62]

    Bender and S.A

    C.M. Bender and S.A. Orszag,Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers, McGraw-Hill, NY, USA (1978), 10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2. 56

  62. [63]

    Narayanan,Phase diagram of the largeNGross–Neveu model in a finite periodic box, Phys

    R. Narayanan,Phase diagram of the largeNGross–Neveu model in a finite periodic box, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 096001 [2001.09200]. 60 86

  63. [64]

    J. Lenz, L. Pannullo, M. Wagner, B. Wellegehausen and A. Wipf,Inhomogeneous phases in the Gross–Neveu model in1+1dimensions at finite number of flavors,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 094512 [2004.00295]. 60

  64. [65]

    Basar and G.V

    G. Basar and G.V. Dunne,Self-consistent crystalline condensate in chiral Gross-Neveu and Bogoliubov-de Gennes systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 200404 [0803.1501]. 61

  65. [66]

    Mariño and R

    M. Mariño and R. Miravitllas,Trans-series from condensates,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 101 [2402.19356]. 61

  66. [67]

    Marino,Anatomy of the simplest renormalon,2504.12044

    M. Marino,Anatomy of the simplest renormalon,2504.12044. 61

  67. [68]

    Trans-series from condensates in the non-linear sigma model

    Y. Liu and M. Mariño,Trans-series from condensates in the non-linear sigma model, 2507.02605. 61

  68. [69]

    H. Li, D. Kusnezov and F. Iachello,Group theoretical properties and band structure of the lamé hamiltonian,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General33(2000) 6413. 78

  69. [70]

    Tricomi,Integral Equations, (Pure and applied mathematics, v

    F. Tricomi,Integral Equations, (Pure and applied mathematics, v. 5), Dover Publications (1985). 82 87