arxiv: 2605.11193 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Prospects for multi-messenger discovery of the gravitational-wave background anisotropies via cross-correlation with galaxies

Raphael Bertrand-Delgado , Felipe Andrade-Oliveira , Michael Ebersold , Marcelle Soares-Santos

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEgr-qc

keywords gravitational wavesstochastic backgroundanisotropiescross-correlationgalaxy surveyscompact binariesforecastsmulti-messenger

0 comments

The pith

4.1-degree resolution allows discovery of gravitational-wave background anisotropies in five years

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper provides forecasts for detecting anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave background from compact binary mergers by cross-correlating with galaxy positions. Simulations show that an angular resolution of 4.1 degrees combined with a complete galaxy catalogue enables this discovery within five years of observation. Extending observations to ten years relaxes the resolution requirement to 6.5 degrees. The approach also allows reconstructing the redshift evolution of the signal through binning, offering a way to test population models. Detection using only gravitational-wave data proves more difficult and requires finer resolution.

Core claim

For compact binaries up to redshift less than 3, cross-correlation with galaxies requires an angular resolution of 4.1 degrees to discover the anisotropies within five years, using a catalogue complete to limiting magnitude 24.7 with redshift uncertainty 0.003 times (1 plus z). Ten years of data improves this to 6.5 degrees. Without the galaxy tracer, discovery demands excluding loud events, 1.8-degree resolution, and a favourable rate.

What carries the argument

The angular cross-power spectrum between gravitational-wave sky maps and galaxy overdensities, which captures the shared clustering of merger sites.

If this is right

Redshift binning reconstructs the evolution of the gravitational-wave background kernel.
This reconstruction further constrains models of the compact binary population.
Gravitational-wave only analysis across time bins requires excluding loudest events for potential discovery.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Different source populations could alter the required resolution for detection.
Improved galaxy surveys would lower the resolution threshold needed.
This cross-correlation technique may extend to other stochastic backgrounds in multi-messenger contexts.

Load-bearing premise

The assumed population of stellar-mass compact binary coalescences matches reality and the galaxy catalogue traces their locations without major biases.

What would settle it

No cross-correlation signal appears in the data even after five years of observations with 4.1-degree angular resolution and a suitable galaxy catalogue.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11193 by Felipe Andrade-Oliveira, Marcelle Soares-Santos, Michael Ebersold, Raphael Bertrand-Delgado.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Merger rate history estimates for BBH, NSBH and BNS. These estimates are obtained using the broken power law model from Equation 7 with parameters given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Left panel: Distribution of simulated CBCs overlaid on the total stellar mass of the host galaxy catalogue within the tomographic bin 0.4 < 𝑧 < 0.6. Each white circle represents an event that occurred in a time of observation 𝑇 = 1 year. The size of the circle corresponds to different chirp mass intervals: <10 (small), 10–15 (medium), and >15 (large) solar masses. Right panel: The gravitational wave energy… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: SGWB shot noise, computed from the simulations, with respect to the time of observation is shown for the entire simulated data set as well as after applying the cut-off thresholds ΩGW < 10−13 , 10−12. The energy cut-off eliminates the non-Gaussian shot noise contribution of the few loudest events, which are expected to be resolvable and, thus, removable. Our shot noise computation is also compared with the… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: SGWB normalised kernels from the analytical prediction for the three merger rate estimates shown together with the galaxy density kernel. To realistically simulate an observed catalogue, the galaxy density kernel is taken from the Euclid Flagship Catalogue with a magnitude cut 𝑖 < 24.7 and redshift uncertainties 𝜎𝑧 = 𝜎0 (1 + 𝑧), with 𝜎0 = 0.003. A lower bound cut is performed for 𝑧 < 0.1, to allow the conv… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Analytical prediction for the autocorrelations of the SGWB at frequency 𝑓 = 25 Hz, taken over the redshift range 0.1 < 𝑧 < 3 for each merger rate estimate presented in Section 2.2. The redshift lower bound allows the kernel integration to converge, while the upper bound is set by the range of the host catalogue. 4.3 Predicted auto- and cross-correlations The theoretical predictions for the angular power sp… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: shows that covariance estimates resulting from the two computations are in good agreement. As a representative case, we 100 101 102 103 ` 10−8 10−7 10−6 CGW,g ` / ( ΩGW / 4 π ) 0.4 < z < 0.6 1.2 < z < 1.4 2.0 < z < 2.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Forecasts for measurements of cross-correlation between the SGWB and the galaxy distribution in the range 0.1 < 𝑧 < 3 for 10 years of observation (blue) shown in comparison with the expectation from randomly distributed CBCs (black) and the analytical prediction (dashed line). redshift bins. We define detectability thresholds based on the SNR. Following the convention adopted in the literature (Abbott et a… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Forecasts for the cross-correlation of the SGWB with the binned galaxy density, shown in comparison with the analytical predictions (black lines). particular, SNR > 3 is achievable for 𝑧 > 1.2. Moreover, a distinct shape is observed, with a peak at 𝑧 ∼ 2.0. This is consistent with the position of the peak of the kernel ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: SNR calculated using Equation 22, for the three merger rate estimates with respect to the maximal angular scale ℓmax considered. The cross-correlation is computed in bins of width Δ𝑧 = 0.2, and then combined to get an estimator vector as in Equation 16, whose covariance is given in Equation 17. The line at SNR= 3 is a reference for the detection threshold. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 z bin center (∆z = 0.… view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: SNR with respect to the total time of observation for SGWB angular power spectrum reconstructed by cross-correlating year-long observationtime bins. The SNR is calculated using Equation 23 and considering only the upper merger rates from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present new empirically grounded forecasts for the detectability of the stochastic gravitational-wave background anisotropies assuming a population of stellar-mass compact binary coalescences as its source. We quantified the discovery potential using simulations based on the Euclid Flagship Galaxy Catalogue and LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observational constraints in combination with detailed theoretical modelling. We considered the multi-messenger cross-correlation with galaxies as well as the gravitational wave-only cross-correlation across observation-time bins. For compact binaries up to redshift $z<3$, we found that an angular resolution of $\theta = 4.1$ deg ($\ell \geq 44$) is required for discovery within five years of observation via cross-correlation with a galaxy catalogue that is complete up to limiting magnitude $i < 24.7$ and has redshift uncertainties $\sigma_z = 0.003 (1+z)$. Extending the time range to ten years alleviates that requirement to $\theta = 6.5$ deg ($\ell \geq 28$). We also showed that binning the galaxies in redshift allows us to reconstruct the evolution of the kernel, which can be used to further constrain compact binary population models. Discovery without a multi-messenger tracer has proven significantly more challenging, requiring exclusion of the loudest events, $\theta = 1.8$ deg ($\ell \geq 95$), and a favourable coalescence rate. In light of the plans being carried out in the community for ongoing and upcoming galaxy surveys, this work bodes well for the multi-messenger discovery and exploration of the stochastic gravitational-wave background in the era of next-generation observatories such as the Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper delivers simulation-based forecasts for multi-messenger detection of GW background anisotropies using Euclid catalogs and LVK constraints, but the quoted angular-resolution thresholds assume galaxies trace mergers with near-perfect correlation.

read the letter

The main point is that the work gives concrete numbers for when cross-correlations with galaxy surveys could reveal anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave background from stellar-mass binaries. Using the Euclid Flagship catalog plus existing LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA population bounds, it finds that an angular resolution of roughly 4 degrees (ℓ ≥ 44) would allow discovery in five years for sources out to z < 3, improving to 6.5 degrees over ten years. Redshift binning is shown to help reconstruct the kernel and tighten population constraints, while the GW-only route looks much harder without excising loud events and assuming a favorable rate. The use of a real simulated catalog and observational anchors makes the forecasts more grounded than purely analytic estimates. The calculations for signal-to-noise in the cross-power spectrum C_ℓ^{GW-g} appear internally consistent on the simulation side. The soft spot is the implicit assumption that the merger rate density follows the galaxy number density with correlation coefficient close to one. The paper does not marginalize over realistic host biases such as metallicity dependence or star-formation weighting, which could drop the effective correlation to 0.6–0.8 and raise the required ℓ threshold. That limitation is not fatal for a forecast paper, but it means the headline numbers are best-case. This is aimed at people planning multi-messenger analyses for Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer. It is worth a reading-group discussion for the methods and would benefit from referee comments on the bias modeling. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject because the empirical grounding and timely question justify the effort even if revisions are needed.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents empirically grounded forecasts for the detectability of anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave background sourced by stellar-mass compact binary coalescences. Using simulations from the Euclid Flagship Galaxy Catalogue combined with LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observational constraints and theoretical modeling, it quantifies the discovery potential through multi-messenger cross-correlations with galaxies and GW-only cross-correlations across time bins. The key result is that for sources up to z < 3, an angular resolution of θ = 4.1 deg (ℓ ≥ 44) is required for discovery within five years via cross-correlation with a galaxy catalog complete to i < 24.7 with redshift uncertainty σ_z = 0.003(1 + z). Extending to ten years relaxes this to θ = 6.5 deg (ℓ ≥ 28). Redshift binning is shown to allow reconstruction of the kernel evolution for constraining population models, while GW-only detection is more challenging.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, this paper offers valuable, concrete guidance for the multi-messenger detection of the stochastic GW background anisotropies in the era of next-generation detectors like the Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer. The forecasts leverage existing observational constraints and planned galaxy surveys, providing a pathway to both discovery and additional constraints on compact binary populations through kernel reconstruction. This is particularly timely given ongoing developments in GW observatories and large-scale structure surveys.

major comments (1)

[Cross-correlation forecasts and SNR calculation] The headline requirement of θ = 4.1 deg for 5-year discovery (abstract and cross-correlation results) relies on the assumption that the galaxy catalog traces the compact binary merger locations with correlation coefficient r ≈ 1 on relevant scales. The manuscript does not appear to marginalize over or simulate realistic host-galaxy biases (e.g., due to metallicity dependence or star-formation rate weighting), which could reduce the effective signal amplitude and increase the required angular resolution. This assumption is load-bearing for the quoted angular-resolution threshold.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract could more explicitly state the range of coalescence rates considered or the specific population model parameters from LVK constraints to allow readers to assess the sensitivity of the results.
[Results section] Some figures showing the SNR as a function of ℓ or observation time might benefit from including sensitivity curves for reduced correlation coefficient r to illustrate robustness against host biases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive assessment of our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and agree that the assumption of near-perfect tracing merits explicit discussion. We will revise the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Cross-correlation forecasts and SNR calculation] The headline requirement of θ = 4.1 deg for 5-year discovery (abstract and cross-correlation results) relies on the assumption that the galaxy catalog traces the compact binary merger locations with correlation coefficient r ≈ 1 on relevant scales. The manuscript does not appear to marginalize over or simulate realistic host-galaxy biases (e.g., due to metallicity dependence or star-formation rate weighting), which could reduce the effective signal amplitude and increase the required angular resolution. This assumption is load-bearing for the quoted angular-resolution threshold.

Authors: We agree that the quoted angular-resolution thresholds assume a high correlation coefficient (r ≈ 1) between the galaxy distribution and the compact-binary merger locations. In the current analysis we directly populate the Euclid Flagship galaxies with mergers whose rate is normalized to LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA constraints, thereby implicitly adopting r ≈ 1 on the scales of interest. We did not introduce additional host-galaxy selection effects such as metallicity-dependent suppression or explicit SFR weighting beyond the simulation’s built-in star-formation history. This is a deliberate simplification for the forecast, but we recognize it is load-bearing for the headline numbers. In the revised manuscript we will (i) add a dedicated paragraph in Section 3.2 explicitly stating the r ≈ 1 assumption, (ii) provide a simple scaling relation showing how the cross-correlation SNR and required θ degrade for r < 1, and (iii) discuss the plausible range of r based on existing literature on metallicity and SFR biases. These additions will make the robustness of the result transparent without altering the core methodology. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forecasts rely on external catalogs and constraints

full rationale

The paper computes discovery thresholds for GW background anisotropies by evaluating the signal-to-noise ratio of the cross-power spectrum C_ℓ^{GW-g} using the external Euclid Flagship Galaxy Catalogue as the tracer population and LVK observational constraints to fix the compact-binary merger rate density. These inputs are independent of the paper's own results; the angular-resolution requirements (θ = 4.1 deg for 5 yr, etc.) are outputs of the SNR calculation rather than inputs that are redefined or refitted inside the work. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or fitted-parameter-renamed-as-prediction is present in the derivation. The modeling assumptions (e.g., r ≈ 1 correlation) are stated explicitly as modeling choices and do not reduce the quoted forecast to a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on assumptions about the source population and the fidelity of galaxy tracers, with parameters from prior observations.

free parameters (2)

coalescence rate = based on LVK constraints
The rate is taken from observational constraints but may involve fitting.
angular resolution thresholds = 4.1 deg, 6.5 deg
Derived from simulations but depend on assumptions.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The galaxy catalogue traces the distribution of compact binary mergers
Assumed that galaxies host the mergers proportionally.
domain assumption The stochastic GW background is dominated by stellar-mass compact binaries
Assumed source population.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5625 in / 1387 out tokens · 57217 ms · 2026-05-13T02:27:38.862044+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We quantified the discovery potential using simulations based on the Euclid Flagship Galaxy Catalogue and LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observational constraints... angular resolution of θ = 4.1 deg (ℓ ≥ 44)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Ω_GW(f_o, ê) = ... ∫ dz dθ R^[i](z,ê,θ) ... kernel W(r,f_o) := (1/4π) ∂_r Ω_GW

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

293 extracted references · 293 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

[1]

GW170817: Implications for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Compact Binary Coalescences , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.091101 , url =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.091101 2018
[2]

Physical Review D , volume =

Linear Power Spectrum of Observed Source Number Counts , author =. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.043516 , urldate =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.043516
[3]

, keywords =

Euclid: Calibrating photometric redshifts with spectroscopic cross-correlations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244795 , archivePrefix =. 2208.10503 , primaryClass =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244795
[4]

Physical Review D , volume =

Very Fast Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background Map Making Using Folded Data , author =. Physical Review D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024001 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:1803.08285 , primaryclass =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.024001
[5]

Extended

LoVerde, Marilena and Afshordi, Niayesh , year = 2008, month = dec, journal =. Extended. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123506 , urldate =. arXiv , keywords =:0809.5112 , primaryclass =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.123506 2008
[6]

Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background , volume =. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/11/4/001 , number =

work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/11/4/001 2011
[7]

Physical Review D , author =

Scalar-induced gravitational waves from coherent initial states , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1103/qd1s-9fxl , language =

work page doi:10.1103/qd1s-9fxl 2026
[8]

Physical Review D , author =

Uncertainty in predicting the stochastic gravitational wave background from compact binary coalescences , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 2026 , pages =. doi:10.1103/p3dn-x5sp , language =

work page doi:10.1103/p3dn-x5sp 2026
[9]

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

Reconstructing primordial curvature perturbations via scalar-induced gravitational waves with. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/062 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/062 2025
[10]

Physical Review D , author =

Likelihoods for stochastic gravitational wave background data analysis , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1103/sjtb-gnz5 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/sjtb-gnz5 2025
[11]

Physical Review D , author =

Cross-correlation of the astrophysical gravitational-wave background with galaxy clustering , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043513 , language =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043513 2020
[12]

Reports on Progress in Physics , author =

Stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds , volume =. Reports on Progress in Physics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae6b5 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae6b5 2018
[13]

Abac, Adrian and Abramo, Raul and Albanesi, Simone and Albertini, Angelica and Agapito, Alessandro and Agathos, Michalis and Albertus, Conrado and Andersson, Nils and Andrade, Tomas and Andreoni, Igor and Angeloni, Federico and Antonelli, Marco and Antoniadis, John and Antonini, Fabio and Sedda, Manuel Arca and Artale, M. Celeste and Ascenzi, Stefano and ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.12263
[14]

and Ade, P

Raghunathan, S. and Ade, P. A. R. and Anbajagane, D. and Anderson, A. J. and Ansarinejad, B. and Archipley, M. and Austermann, J. E. and Balkenhol, L. and Barron, D. R. and Barry, P. S. and Beall, J. A. and Benabed, K. and Bender, A. N. and Benson, B. A. and Bianchini, F. and Bleem, L. E. and Bock, J. and Bocquet, S. and Bouchet, F. R. and Bryant, L. and ...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10107
[15]

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

Mapping gas around massive galaxies: cross-correlation of. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1167 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1167 2023
[16]

Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

How accurate is. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066352 , number =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066352 2007
[17]

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =

Core. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab1658 , abstract =

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab1658 2019
[18]

The Flagship galaxy mock catalogue: A comprehensive simulation for the Euclid mission

Euclid. Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450853 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450853 2025
[19]

Physical Review Letters , author =

Upper. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.121101 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.121101 2017
[20]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Upper Limits on the Isotropic Gravitational-Wave Background from the first part of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA's fourth Observing Run. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.20721 , archivePrefix =. 2508.20721 , primaryClass =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20721
[21]

Physical Review X , author =

The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through. Physical Review X , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048 2023
[22]

, keywords =

Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from. Physical Review D , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.061101 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.061101 2019
[23]

Physical Review D , author =

Search for anisotropic gravitational-wave backgrounds using data from. Physical Review D , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.022005 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.022005 2021
[24]

P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

Observation of. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016
[25]

GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

2025 , note =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.18082 , abstract =

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18082 2025
[26]

GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.18083 , archivePrefix =. 2508.18083 , primaryClass =

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18083
[27]

D., Acernese, F., et al

Physical Review X , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 2023
[28]

2021 , note =

Physical Review X , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 2021
[29]

P., et al

Physical Review X , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019
[31]

2025 , note =

Cosmological and. 2025 , note =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.26848 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.26848 2025
[32]

P., Abbott, R., et al

Advanced. Classical and Quantum Gravity , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 , number =

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 2015
[33]

Universality of

Jiang, Boyuan and Saito, Ryo and Zhang, Ying-li , month = feb, year =. Universality of. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.06562 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06562
[34]

and Genel, Shy and Krause, Elisabeth and Somerville, Rachel S

Perez, Lucia A. and Genel, Shy and Krause, Elisabeth and Somerville, Rachel S. , month = feb, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.04987 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.04987
[35]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.01602 , abstract =

Schulze, Florian and Dall'Armi, Lorenzo Valbusa and Lesgourgues, Julien and Ricciardone, Angelo and Bartolo, Nicola and Bertacca, Daniele and Fidler, Christian and Matarrese, Sabino , month = sep, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.01602 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.01602
[36]

Physical Review D , author =

Subtracting. Physical Review D , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.064040 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.064040 2023
[37]

Highlights in High-Energy Physics , author =

Probing beyond the. Highlights in High-Energy Physics , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.53941/hihep.2025.100022 , abstract =

work page doi:10.53941/hihep.2025.100022 2025
[38]

Report of the Dark Energy Task Force

Report of the Dark Energy Task Force. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0609591 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0609591 , primaryClass =

work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0609591
[39]

Physical Review Letters , author =

Anisotropies in the. Physical Review Letters , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.011301 , language =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.011301 2013
[40]

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

On the anisotropy of the gravitational wave background from massless preheating , volume =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/047 , number =

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/047 2014
[41]

Physical Review D , author =

Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 2012 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.023534 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.023534 2012
[42]

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation , volume =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/031 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/031 2016
[43]

Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aac608 , number =

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aac608 2018
[44]

Physical Review D , author =

Inadequacies of the. Physical Review D , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.084013 , language =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.084013 2013
[45]

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

Component. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/024 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/024 2016
[46]

Physical Review D , author =

Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for. Physical Review D , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103529 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103529 2021
[47]

Physical Review D , author =

Distinguishing a stochastic gravitational-wave signal from correlated noise with joint parameter estimation:. Physical Review D , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064055 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.064055 2023
[48]

Physical Review D , author =

Use and abuse of the. Physical Review D , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.042001 , language =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.042001 2008
[49]

The Astrophysical Journal , author =

Disentangling. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac86cc , abstract =

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac86cc 2022
[50]

Nature , author =

Large-scale. Nature , author =. 1968 , pages =. doi:10.1038/217511a0 , language =

work page doi:10.1038/217511a0 1968
[51]

Suarez, Rebeca Gonzalez , month = may, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2204.10029 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.10029
[52]

Physical Review D , author =

The. Physical Review D , author =. 1994 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.739 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.739 1994
[53]

ArXiv e-prints(2026) 2601.14864

Mena-Fernández, J. and Avila, S. and Porredon, A. and Camacho, H. and Muir, J. and Sanchez, E. and Adamow, M. and Bechtol, K. and Camilleri, R. and Campailla, G. and Davis, T. M. and Deiosso, N. and Doux, C. and Drlica-Wagner, A. and Ferté, A. and Gruendl, R. A. and Hartley, W. G. and Pieres, A. and Raveri, M. and Rykoff, E. S. and Sevilla-Noarbe, I. and ...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14864
[54]

and Ferté, A

Sanchez-Cid, D. and Ferté, A. and Blazek, J. and Samuroff, S. and Amon, A. and Andrade-Oliveira, F. and Coloma-Nadal, J. M. and Muir, J. and Porredon, A. and Prat, J. and Weaverdyck, N. and Yamamoto, M. and Anbajagane, D. and Becker, M. R. and Carrilho, P. and Chang, C. and Crocce, M. and Giannini, G. and d'Assignies, W. and DeRose, J. and Dodelson, S. an...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14859
[55]

Collaboration, D. E. S. and Abbott, T. M. C. and Adamow, M. and Aguena, M. and Alarcon, A. and Allam, S. S. and Alves, O. and Amon, A. and Anbajagane, D. and Andrade-Oliveira, F. and Avila, S. and Bacon, D. and Baxter, E. J. and Beas-Gonzalez, J. and Bechtol, K. and Becker, M. R. and Bernstein, G. M. and Bertin, E. and Blazek, J. and Bocquet, S. and Brook...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14559
[56]

and Liddle, Andrew R

Lyth, David H. and Liddle, Andrew R. , month = jun, year =. The

work page
[57]

Status of the

Cesare, Martina Di , month = may, year =. Status of the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.18802 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18802
[59]

Constrained realizations of Gaussian fields - A simple algorithm

Constrained. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1991 , note =. doi:10.1086/186160 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1086/186160 1991
[60]

Simulation and modelling of the astrophysical gravitational wave background

Bertrand-Delgado, Raphael and Andrade-Oliveira, Felipe and Ebersold, Michael and Soares-Santos, Marcelle , year =. Simulation and modelling of the astrophysical gravitational wave background. , journal =

work page
[61]

Anisotropies of the

Bertrand-Delgado, Raphael , year =. Anisotropies of the

work page
[62]

Classical and Quantum Gravity , author =

Gwbench: a novel. Classical and Quantum Gravity , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1618 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1618 2021
[63]

Sensitivity studies for third-generation gravitational wave observatories

Sensitivity. Classical and Quantum Gravity , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/9/094013 2011
[64]

The Astrophysical Journal , author =

Perturbations of a. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1967 , note =. doi:10.1086/148982 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1086/148982 1967
[65]

Dodelson, Scott and Schmidt, Fabian , month = jan, year =. Modern. doi:10.1016/C2017-0-01943-2 , note =

work page doi:10.1016/c2017-0-01943-2
[66]

Physics of the Dark Universe , author =

Encyclopaedia. Physics of the Dark Universe , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2014.01.003 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2014.01.003 2014
[67]

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

Unraveling. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/064 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/064 2023
[68]

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

Probing. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/009 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/009 2022
[69]

The Astrophysical Journal , author =

Integrated. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/715/1/L12 , number =

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/715/1/l12 2010
[70]

Physical Review D , author =

Next-generation global gravitational-wave detector network:. Physical Review D , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.122006 , language =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.122006 2024
[71]

First measurement of the

Andrade-Oliveira, Felipe and Sanchez-Cid, David and Laghi, Danny and Soares-Santos, Marcelle , month = jan, year =. First measurement of the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.04774 , abstract =

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.04774
[72]

A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2109.09882 , archivePrefix =. 2109.09882 , primaryClass =

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.09882
[73]

Maggiore, Michele , month = mar, year =. High-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.gr-qc/9803028 , abstract =

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9803028
[74]

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

Non-. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/014 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/014 2023
[75]

Physical Review D , author =

New universal property of cosmological gravitational wave anisotropies , volume =. Physical Review D , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103502 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.103502 2023
[76]

Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , keywords =

Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 , archivePrefix =. 2005.05574 , primaryClass =

work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 2005
[77]

2015, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32, 024001, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001

Advanced. Classical and Quantum Gravity , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 , number =

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 2015
[78]

Uncertainty in predicting the stochastic gravitational wave background from compact binary coalescences , url =

Ebersold, Michael and Regimbau, Tania , month = jan, year =. Uncertainty in predicting the stochastic gravitational wave background from compact binary coalescences , url =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.02163 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02163
[79]

Living Reviews in Relativity , author =

Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment , volume =. Living Reviews in Relativity , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1 , language =

work page doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1 2017
[80]

and Sakellariadou, Mairi , month = jan, year =

Bagui, Eleni and Clesse, Sébastien and Lillo, Federico De and Jenkins, Alexander C. and Sakellariadou, Mairi , month = jan, year =. Popcorn in the sky:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.07774 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07774
[81]

Physical Review D , author =

Detection of. Physical Review D , author =. 1997 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.545 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.545 1997
[82]

Physical Review D , author =

Characterizing the. Physical Review D , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023527 , abstract =

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023527 2020

Showing first 80 references.