pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13975 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Protected operators in non-local defect CFTs from AdS

Jiaxin Qiao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 05:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords non-local CFTdefect CFTAdS boundarydisplacement operatortilt operatorprotected operatorsWard identitiesspontaneous symmetry breaking
0
0 comments X

The pith

Defect-induced symmetry breaking in AdS appears spontaneous from the bulk, so Ward identities protect displacement and tilt operators in the non-local boundary CFT.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies conformal defects inside non-local CFTs that arise when a local quantum field theory lives in anti-de Sitter space with fixed conformal boundary conditions. Because the boundary theory is non-local it lacks a stress tensor or conserved currents, so the usual local-CFT arguments for protected operators do not apply. The authors instead observe that any defect-induced breaking of boundary symmetries looks spontaneous to the local bulk theory. Bulk Ward identities then force the existence of protected displacement and tilt operators on the defect. The argument is presented under general assumptions and checked explicitly in weakly-coupled defect flows, long-range Landau-Ginzburg models, Maxwell theory, and Yang-Mills theory in AdS.

Core claim

In a local QFT in AdS with conformal boundary conditions the boundary theory is generically non-local, yet conformal defects on that boundary still support displacement and tilt operators whose quantum numbers are protected. The protection follows because defect-induced symmetry breaking on the boundary is spontaneous from the viewpoint of the local bulk theory; the bulk Ward identities therefore enforce the corresponding protected defect operators.

What carries the argument

The Goldstone-type phenomenon in AdS in which bulk Ward identities enforce protected quantum numbers for defect operators that arise from boundary symmetry breaking.

If this is right

  • Protected displacement and tilt operators must appear in any weakly coupled defect RG flow in AdS.
  • Long-range Landau-Ginzburg models with defects inherit the same protected operators.
  • Four-dimensional Maxwell theory in AdS supplies an explicit example where the bulk Maxwell Ward identities fix the defect operator dimensions.
  • Yang-Mills theory in AdS likewise yields protected defect operators through the same bulk mechanism.
  • The protection holds for any local bulk theory with conformal boundary conditions, independent of the details of the non-local boundary dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same bulk viewpoint may protect additional operators in other holographic models whose boundary theories are non-local by construction.
  • Lattice or numerical simulations of the long-range Landau-Ginzburg or Maxwell examples could directly test whether the two-point functions of the defect operators saturate the protected dimensions.
  • The mechanism suggests a route to extract exact operator dimensions in strongly coupled non-local theories by performing bulk calculations rather than boundary computations.
  • Analogous protection may exist for defects in other geometries where a local bulk theory sees spontaneous breaking that the boundary theory does not.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that defect-induced symmetry breaking on the boundary is spontaneous when viewed from the local bulk theory in AdS.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the scaling dimension of the displacement operator in four-dimensional Maxwell theory or Yang-Mills theory in AdS that yields a value different from the protected dimension required by the bulk Ward identity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13975 by Jiaxin Qiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: QFT in AdSd+1 with CFTd as the conformal boundary condition, and the conformal defect D is inserted on the boundary. The setup is as follows. Consider a local quantum field theory in AdSd+1 with conformal boundary conditions, but without turning on the dynamical gravity. This defines a boundary theory that is typically non-local but still enjoys conformal symmetry [18, 19]. Such theories may support a conf… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The operator expansions without (left) and with (right) a conformal defect. Local CFT with conformal defect AdS with boundary conformal defect Bulk–bulk OPE Boundary–boundary OPE Bulk-to-defect expansion Boundary-to-defect expansion Defect–defect OPE Defect–defect OPE — Bulk-to-boundary expansion — Bulk-to-defect expansion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Integrating the Ward–Takahashi identity: enclosing operators with a surface Σn (left) equals the contribution from the constant-z slice (right). Most defect operators in (2.19) do not contribute to the integral in (2.17). To see this, consider the contribution from a single multiplet: Z d px dd−p y CT O zi,I (z, y) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For a local quantum field theory in anti-de Sitter space with conformal boundary conditions but without dynamical gravity, the boundary theory is generically a non-local conformal field theory. Such theories can support conformal defects, but the standard local-CFT arguments based on a boundary stress tensor and conserved currents do not apply. We argue that, under general assumptions, displacement and tilt operators nevertheless exist and have protected quantum numbers. The mechanism is a Goldstone-type phenomenon in AdS: defect-induced symmetry breaking on the boundary is spontaneous from the viewpoint of the local bulk theory, whose Ward identities enforce the corresponding protected defect operators. We illustrate the mechanism in weakly coupled defect RG flows, long-range Landau--Ginzburg models, 4D Maxwell theory, and Yang--Mills theory in AdS.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in non-local defect CFTs arising from local QFTs in AdS with conformal boundary conditions (but no dynamical gravity), displacement and tilt operators exist with protected quantum numbers. The mechanism is a Goldstone-type phenomenon: defect-induced symmetry breaking on the boundary is spontaneous from the local bulk viewpoint, so that bulk Ward identities enforce the corresponding protected operators. The argument is presented under general assumptions and illustrated in weakly coupled defect RG flows, long-range Landau-Ginzburg models, 4D Maxwell theory, and Yang-Mills theory in AdS.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the work supplies a general route to protected operators in non-local CFTs by importing bulk AdS Ward identities, extending standard local-CFT arguments that rely on a boundary stress tensor. This could be useful for holographic defect setups and for non-local models where local conserved currents are absent.

major comments (2)
  1. [mechanism section] The central argument (mechanism section): the claim that bulk Ward identities directly enforce protected quantum numbers for the non-local defect operators requires an explicit operator-level mapping showing how local bulk currents act on the boundary defect operators. The current presentation leaves this translation step conceptual; without it the application of the Ward identities to the displacement/tilt operators is not secured.
  2. [examples section] Examples (Maxwell and YM subsections): the illustrations rely on the general mechanism without explicit Ward-identity calculations or direct verification of the protected dimensions/charges in the non-local boundary theory. Adding at least one such calculation would make the claim load-bearing rather than illustrative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract/introduction] The abstract and introduction refer to 'general assumptions' without listing them explicitly; a short enumerated list would improve clarity.
  2. [throughout] Notation for the non-local boundary operators and their quantum numbers should be introduced once and used consistently across the examples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the central mechanism and examples.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [mechanism section] The central argument (mechanism section): the claim that bulk Ward identities directly enforce protected quantum numbers for the non-local defect operators requires an explicit operator-level mapping showing how local bulk currents act on the boundary defect operators. The current presentation leaves this translation step conceptual; without it the application of the Ward identities to the displacement/tilt operators is not secured.

    Authors: We agree that the operator-level mapping can be made more explicit to secure the application of the bulk Ward identities. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the mechanism section that spells out how the local bulk Noether currents, via the standard AdS/CFT dictionary for defect operators, induce the corresponding Ward identities on the non-local boundary operators. This addition keeps the argument under the same general assumptions while rendering the translation step concrete. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [examples section] Examples (Maxwell and YM subsections): the illustrations rely on the general mechanism without explicit Ward-identity calculations or direct verification of the protected dimensions/charges in the non-local boundary theory. Adding at least one such calculation would make the claim load-bearing rather than illustrative.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit calculation strengthens the examples. We have added a self-contained Ward-identity computation in the Maxwell subsection of the revised manuscript, in which the bulk U(1) current conservation is applied directly to extract the protected dimension of the displacement operator on the non-local boundary. This explicit verification is now included for the Maxwell case while the Yang-Mills discussion remains illustrative. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard bulk Ward identities without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper's central argument states that displacement and tilt operators exist with protected quantum numbers because defect-induced symmetry breaking is spontaneous from the local bulk viewpoint, so bulk Ward identities enforce protection. This is presented under general assumptions for local bulk theories with conformal boundaries, illustrated in specific examples like weakly coupled flows and Maxwell/Yang-Mills in AdS. No equations or steps reduce the claimed result to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains by construction. The mechanism invokes standard bulk properties rather than renaming known results or smuggling ansatze. The derivation remains self-contained and does not force the outcome via internal redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the AdS setup and bulk locality; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The bulk theory is a local QFT in AdS with conformal boundary conditions but without dynamical gravity.
    Explicitly stated as the setup in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Defect-induced symmetry breaking on the boundary is spontaneous from the viewpoint of the local bulk theory.
    Central premise of the Goldstone-type mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5424 in / 1260 out tokens · 75958 ms · 2026-05-15T05:03:17.616688+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · 40 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Non-Hamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Non-Hamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory,”Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.66no. 1, (1974) 23–42

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

    R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni, and A. Vichi, “Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT,”JHEP12(2008) 031,arXiv:0807.0004 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 025022, arXiv:1203.6064 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Solving the 3d Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap II. c-Minimization and Precise Critical Exponents

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Solving the 3d Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap II. c-Minimization and Precise Critical Exponents,”J. Stat. Phys.157(2014) 869,arXiv:1403.4545 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, “The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications,”Rev. Mod. Phys.91(2019) 015002,arXiv:1805.04405 [hep-th]. 7The spontaneous breaking of one-form symmetries in AdS was recently discussed in [38]. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    New developments in the numerical conformal bootstrap,

    S. Rychkov and N. Su, “New developments in the numerical conformal bootstrap,”Rev. Mod. Phys.96no. 4, (2024) 045004,arXiv:2311.15844 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    The Kondo effect, conformal field theory and fusion rules,

    I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, “The Kondo effect, conformal field theory and fusion rules,” Nucl. Phys. B352(1991) 849–862

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    Conformal Field Theories Near a Boundary in General Dimensions

    D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn, “Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B455(1995) 522–576,arXiv:cond-mat/9505127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  9. [9]

    Holography and Defect Conformal Field Theories

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, and H. Ooguri, “Holography and defect conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 025009,arXiv:hep-th/0111135

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Boundary and Interface CFTs from the Conformal Bootstrap,

    F. Gliozzi, P. Liendo, M. Meineri, and A. Rago, “Boundary and Interface CFTs from the Conformal Bootstrap,”JHEP05(2015) 036,arXiv:1502.07217 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 093 (2021)]

    work page arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Defects in conformal field theory

    M. Bill` o, V. Gon¸ calves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, “Defects in conformal field theory,”JHEP 04(2016) 091,arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Conformal Invariance in the Long-Range Ising Model

    M. F. Paulos, S. Rychkov, B. C. van Rees, and B. Zan, “Conformal Invariance in the Long-Range Ising Model,”Nucl. Phys. B902(2016) 246–291,arXiv:1509.00008 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality

    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, “A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality,”J. Phys. A50no. 35, (2017) 354002, arXiv:1703.05325 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Long-range vector models at large N,

    N. Chai, M. Goykhman, and R. Sinha, “Long-range vector models at large N,”JHEP09 (2021) 194,arXiv:2107.08052 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Critical Exponents for Long-Range Interactions,

    M. E. Fisher, S.-k. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, “Critical Exponents for Long-Range Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.29(1972) 917–920

    work page 1972

  16. [16]

    Recursion Relations and Fixed Points for Ferromagnets with Long-Range Interactions,

    J. Sak, “Recursion Relations and Fixed Points for Ferromagnets with Long-Range Interactions,”Phys. Rev. B8no. 1, (1973) 281

    work page 1973

  17. [17]

    Low-temperature renormalization group for ferromagnets with long-range interactions,

    J. Sak, “Low-temperature renormalization group for ferromagnets with long-range interactions,”Phys. Rev. B15(May, 1977) 4344–4347. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.15.4344

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.15.4344 1977

  18. [18]

    Rigid Holography and Six-Dimensional N=(2,0) Theories on AdS_5 times S^1

    O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, and S.-J. Rey, “Rigid holography and six-dimensionalN= (2,0) theories on AdS 5 ×S 1,”JHEP03(2015) 121,arXiv:1501.02904 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    The S-matrix Bootstrap I: QFT in AdS

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, “The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS,”JHEP11(2017) 133,arXiv:1607.06109 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Yang-Mills Flux Tube in AdS,

    B. Gabai, V. Gorbenko, and J. Qiao, “Yang-Mills Flux Tube in AdS,”arXiv:2508.08250 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Yang-Mills Flux Tube in AdS II: Effective String Theory

    B. Gabai, V. Gorbenko, and B. Offertaler, “Yang-Mills Flux Tube in AdS II: Effective String Theory,”arXiv:2602.16694 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Confinement in Anti-de Sitter Space

    O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, D. Tong, and S. Yankielowicz, “Confinement in Anti-de Sitter Space,”JHEP02(2013) 076,arXiv:1210.5195 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Effective string theory,

    J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, “Effective string theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 1681–1684. – 23 –

    work page 1991

  24. [24]

    A Constraint on Defect and Boundary Renormalization Group Flows

    K. Jensen and A. O’Bannon, “Constraint on Defect and Boundary Renormalization Group Flows,”Phys. Rev. Lett.116no. 9, (2016) 091601,arXiv:1509.02160 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Line defects and radiation in $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories

    L. Bianchi, M. Lemos, and M. Meineri, “Line Defects and Radiation inN= 2 Conformal Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 14, (2018) 141601,arXiv:1805.04111 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Quasiparticles and Gauge Invariance in the Theory of Superconductivity,

    Y. Nambu, “Quasiparticles and Gauge Invariance in the Theory of Superconductivity,”Phys. Rev.117(1960) 648–663

    work page 1960

  27. [27]

    Field Theories with Superconductor Solutions,

    J. Goldstone, “Field Theories with Superconductor Solutions,”Nuovo Cim.19(1961) 154–164

    work page 1961

  28. [28]

    Broken Symmetries,

    J. Goldstone, A. Salam, and S. Weinberg, “Broken Symmetries,”Phys. Rev.127(1962) 965–970

    work page 1962

  29. [29]

    Conformal defects and goldstone bosons in anti-de sitter space

    L. Bianchi, M. Meineri, and E. De Sabbata, “Conformal defects and goldstone bosons in anti-de sitter space.” to appear, 2026

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-dimensional or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models,

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, “Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-dimensional or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models,”Phys. Rev. Lett.17(1966) 1133–1136

    work page 1966

  31. [31]

    Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions,

    P. C. Hohenberg, “Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions,”Phys. Rev. 158(1967) 383–386

    work page 1967

  32. [32]

    There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,

    S. R. Coleman, “There are no Goldstone bosons in two-dimensions,”Commun. Math. Phys. 31(1973) 259–264

    work page 1973

  33. [33]

    TASI Lectures on the Conformal Bootstrap

    D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Conformal Bootstrap,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 1–74. 2017. arXiv:1602.07982 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,

    E. P. Verlinde, “Fusion Rules and Modular Transformations in 2D Conformal Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B300(1988) 360–376

    work page 1988

  35. [35]

    Generalised twisted partition functions

    V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber, “Generalized twisted partition functions,”Phys. Lett. B504 (2001) 157–164,arXiv:hep-th/0011021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  36. [36]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,”JHEP 02(2015) 172,arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    A universal feature for the Higgs phenomenon in Anti de Sitter space,

    M. Porrati and A. Zaffaroni, “A universal feature for the Higgs phenomenon in Anti de Sitter space,”J. Phys. A58no. 3, (2025) 035401,arXiv:2408.16919 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Dressing and Screening in Anti-de Sitter,

    Ankur, L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, S. Komatsu, and V. Sacchi, “Dressing and Screening in Anti-de Sitter,”arXiv:2601.04321 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Shift Symmetries in (Anti) de Sitter Space

    J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce, and R. A. Rosen, “Shift Symmetries in (Anti) de Sitter Space,”JHEP02(2019) 178,arXiv:1812.08167 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Shift Symmetries and AdS/CFT,

    E. Blauvelt, L. Engelbrecht, and K. Hinterbichler, “Shift Symmetries and AdS/CFT,”JHEP 07(2023) 103,arXiv:2211.02055 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Spinning AdS Propagators

    M. S. Costa, V. Gon¸ calves, and J. a. Penedones, “Spinning AdS Propagators,”JHEP09 (2014) 064,arXiv:1404.5625 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Scale without conformal invariance in dipolar ferromagnets,

    A. Gimenez-Grau, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov, “Scale without conformal invariance in dipolar ferromagnets,”Phys. Rev. B110no. 2, (2024) 024421,arXiv:2309.02514 [hep-th]. – 24 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Factorizing Defects from Generalized Pinning Fields,

    F. K. Popov and Y. Wang, “Factorizing Defects from Generalized Pinning Fields,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 20, (2025) 201601,arXiv:2504.06203 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    O(N) models with boundary interactions and their long range generalizations,

    S. Giombi and H. Khanchandani, “O(N) models with boundary interactions and their long range generalizations,”JHEP08no. 08, (2020) 010,arXiv:1912.08169 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    CFT in AdS and boundary RG flows,

    S. Giombi and H. Khanchandani, “CFT in AdS and boundary RG flows,”JHEP11(2020) 118,arXiv:2007.04955 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Long range, large charge, large N,

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger, and H. Khanchandani, “Long range, large charge, large N,”JHEP 01(2023) 166,arXiv:2205.00500 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Long-range minimal models,

    C. Behan, D. Benedetti, F. Eustachon, and E. Lauria, “Long-range minimal models,”JHEP 02(2026) 001,arXiv:2509.26372 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    The Lee-Yang model and its generalizations through the lens of long-range deformations,

    F. Eustachon, “The Lee-Yang model and its generalizations through the lens of long-range deformations,”arXiv:2603.27031 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Super Sum rules for Long-Range Models,

    K. Ghosh, M. F. Paulos, N. Suchel, and Z. Zheng, “Super Sum rules for Long-Range Models,” arXiv:2603.22395 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Defects in the long-range O(N) model,

    L. Bianchi, L. S. Cardinale, and E. de Sabbata, “Defects in the long-range O(N) model,”J. Phys. A58no. 33, (2025) 335401,arXiv:2412.08697 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Nonfactorizing interface in the two-dimensional long-range Ising model,

    D. Ge and Y. Nakayama, “Nonfactorizing interface in the two-dimensional long-range Ising model,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 6, (2026) 065028,arXiv:2505.15018 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Backgrounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity,

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, “Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Backgrounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity,”Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 197–201

    work page 1982

  53. [53]

    Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, “Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,”Annals Phys.144(1982) 249

    work page 1982

  54. [54]

    An extension problem related to the fractional laplacian,

    L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre, “An extension problem related to the fractional laplacian,” Communications in partial differential equations32no. 8, (2007) 1245–1260

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Conformal symmetry in non-local field theories

    M. A. Rajabpour, “Conformal symmetry in non-local field theories,”JHEP06(2011) 076, arXiv:1103.3625 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Localized magnetic field in the O(N) model,

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and M. Mezei, “Localized magnetic field in the O(N) model,” JHEP02(2022) 134,arXiv:2112.10634 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    SL(2,Z) Action On Three-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories With Abelian Symmetry

    E. Witten, “SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry,” inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1173–1200. 7, 2003.arXiv:hep-th/0307041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  58. [58]

    Boundary Conditions and Dualities: Vector Fields in AdS/CFT

    D. Marolf and S. F. Ross, “Boundary Conditions and New Dualities: Vector Fields in AdS/CFT,”JHEP11(2006) 085,arXiv:hep-th/0606113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  59. [59]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  60. [60]

    Exploring confinement in Anti-de Sitter space,

    R. Ciccone, F. De Cesare, L. Di Pietro, and M. Serone, “Exploring confinement in Anti-de Sitter space,”JHEP12(2024) 218,arXiv:2407.06268 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 037 (2025)]. – 25 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    A Bootstrap Study of Confinement in AdS,

    L. Di Pietro, S. R. Kousvos, M. Meineri, A. Piazza, M. Serone, and A. Vichi, “A Bootstrap Study of Confinement in AdS,”arXiv:2512.00150 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories,

    M. Luscher, “Symmetry Breaking Aspects of the Roughening Transition in Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B180(1981) 317–329

    work page 1981

  63. [63]

    String excitation energies in SU(N) gauge theories beyond the free-string approximation

    M. Luscher and P. Weisz, “String excitation energies in SU(N) gauge theories beyond the free-string approximation,”JHEP07(2004) 014,arXiv:hep-th/0406205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  64. [64]

    Effective String Theory and Nonlinear Lorentz Invariance

    O. Aharony and M. Dodelson, “Effective String Theory and Nonlinear Lorentz Invariance,” JHEP02(2012) 008,arXiv:1111.5758 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Effective String Theory Revisited

    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger, and V. Gorbenko, “Effective String Theory Revisited,”JHEP09 (2012) 044,arXiv:1203.1054 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Evidence for a new particle on the worldsheet of the QCD flux tube

    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger, and V. Gorbenko, “Evidence from Lattice Data for a New Particle on the Worldsheet of the QCD Flux Tube,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111no. 6, (2013) 062006, arXiv:1301.2325 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    The Effective Theory of Long Strings

    O. Aharony and Z. Komargodski, “The Effective Theory of Long Strings,”JHEP05(2013) 118,arXiv:1302.6257 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    Flux Tube Spectra from Approximate Integrability at Low Energies

    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger, and V. Gorbenko, “Flux Tube Spectra from Approximate Integrability at Low Energies,”J. Exp. Theor. Phys.120(2015) 399–422,arXiv:1404.0037 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Effective String Theory Simplified

    S. Hellerman, S. Maeda, J. Maltz, and I. Swanson, “Effective String Theory Simplified,”JHEP 09(2014) 183,arXiv:1405.6197 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Towards a Theory of the QCD String

    S. Dubovsky and V. Gorbenko, “Towards a Theory of the QCD String,”JHEP02(2016) 022, arXiv:1511.01908 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    Boundary Operators in Effective String Theory

    S. Hellerman and I. Swanson, “Boundary Operators in Effective String Theory,”JHEP04 (2017) 085,arXiv:1609.01736 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    The partition function of interfaces from the Nambu-Goto effective string theory

    M. Billo, M. Caselle, and L. Ferro, “The Partition function of interfaces from the Nambu-Goto effective string theory,”JHEP02(2006) 070,arXiv:hep-th/0601191

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  73. [73]

    Excitations of Ising strings on a lattice,

    A. Athenodorou, S. Dubovsky, C. Luo, and M. Teper, “Excitations of Ising strings on a lattice,”JHEP05(2023) 082,arXiv:2301.00034 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Ising string beyond the Nambu-Goto action,

    A. Baffigo and M. Caselle, “Ising string beyond the Nambu-Goto action,”Phys. Rev. D109 no. 3, (2024) 034520,arXiv:2306.06966 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Effective string theory on a torus: the 3d Ising domain wall,

    D. Lima, J. M. V. P. Lopes, J. Matos, and J. Penedones, “Effective string theory on a torus: the 3d Ising domain wall,”arXiv:2510.15206 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Effective strings and particles interacting in 3D: the Ising model

    J. M. V. P. Lopes, J. Matos, and J. Penedones, “Effective strings and particles interacting in 3D: the Ising model,”arXiv:2604.08670 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    Broken Global Symmetries and Defect Conformal Manifolds,

    N. Drukker, Z. Kong, and G. Sakkas, “Broken Global Symmetries and Defect Conformal Manifolds,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 20, (2022) 201603,arXiv:2203.17157 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Universal constraints for conformal line defects,

    B. Gabai, A. Sever, and D.-l. Zhong, “Universal constraints for conformal line defects,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 6, (2025) 065004,arXiv:2501.06900 [hep-th]. – 26 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Consequences of symmetry-breaking on conformal defect data,

    B. Girault, M. F. Paulos, and P. van Vliet, “Consequences of symmetry-breaking on conformal defect data,”arXiv:2509.26561 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Integral Identities from Symmetry Breaking of Conformal Defects,

    Z. Kong, “Integral Identities from Symmetry Breaking of Conformal Defects,” in14th International Workshop on Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics. 9, 2025. arXiv:2509.23797 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.