pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16760 · v1 · pith:SYRMOLPRnew · submitted 2026-05-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.HE

A Rare Population of Intermediate-mass Helium Stars Between Hot Subdwarfs and Wolf-Rayet Stars

Gui-Yu Wang , Yong Shao , Jian-Guo He , Yu-Dong Nie , Xiao-Jie Xu , Xiang-Dong Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 20:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE
keywords intermediate-mass helium starsbinary population synthesiscommon-envelope evolutionmass transferhot subdwarfsWolf-Rayet starsgalactic stellar populations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Binary population synthesis predicts several thousand intermediate-mass helium stars in the Milky Way.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models the formation of helium stars with masses between two and eight solar masses using binary population synthesis across different metallicities. These stars bridge the gap between low-mass hot subdwarfs and massive Wolf-Rayet stars but have remained largely unobserved until now. The calculations identify metallicity and common-envelope ejection efficiency as the main factors controlling their numbers and binary properties. The model estimates several thousand such stars in the Milky Way and hundreds in the Magellanic Clouds, with the great majority residing in binaries rather than as single objects.

Core claim

Intermediate-mass helium stars in the 2-8 solar mass range form through binary interactions. Metallicity and common-envelope ejection efficiency are the dominant factors shaping the population. Several thousand IMHeS exist in the Milky Way and several hundred in the Magellanic Clouds, with the vast majority in binaries and fewer than 10 percent appearing as single stars. Among the binaries, more than half have main-sequence companions formed mainly through stable mass transfer, while the rest have compact companions arising predominantly from common-envelope evolution.

What carries the argument

Binary population synthesis tracking mass transfer stability and common-envelope ejection for stars in the 2-8 solar mass range at varying metallicities.

If this is right

  • Metallicity variations across galaxies produce different total numbers and companion distributions for IMHeS.
  • Over 50 percent of IMHeS binaries contain main-sequence companions formed via stable mass transfer.
  • The remainder host compact companions such as white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes formed via common-envelope evolution.
  • Fewer than 10 percent of all IMHeS appear as single stars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Targeted spectroscopic searches of binary candidates could locate these stars more efficiently than blind surveys.
  • The predicted population may link to observed rates of certain binary outcomes or stripped-star supernova progenitors.
  • Varying common-envelope efficiency parameters in the models could be calibrated against future detections of the single-star fraction.

Load-bearing premise

The standard prescriptions for mass transfer stability and common-envelope ejection in binary population synthesis accurately represent the physics for stars in the 2-8 solar mass range across metallicities.

What would settle it

A galactic survey that finds a total number of 2-8 solar mass helium stars significantly different from several thousand, or a binary fraction far from 90 percent, would test the population predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16760 by Gui-Yu Wang, Jian-Guo He, Xiang-Dong Li, Xiao-jie Xu, Yong Shao, Yu-Dong Nie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Predicted birthrates (top panel) and total numbers (bottom panel) of IMHeS as a function of MHe for different physical assumptions (assuming a constant SFR of 1 M⊙ yr−1 ). From left to right, the panels show results for variations in metallicity, MT efficiency, CE ejection efficiency αCE, and He-star wind scaling factor ηHe. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic illustration of the three primary evo￾lutionary channels leading to the formation of He+MS bi￾naries. The normalized number fractions of IMHeS formed via each channel in our fiducial model are marked, with Case B MT and CE evolution being the dominant pathways. In each channel, the primordial binary undergoes RLOF, result￾ing in the stripping of the primary’s hydrogen envelope and the formation o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Hertzsprung-Russell diagram showing the evolutionary tracks and number distributions (marginal panels) of IMHeS in He+MS binaries for four metallicity environments (Models A–D). Evolutionary tracks for individual binaries in the Case A MT (black), Case B MT (orange), and CE evolution (skyblue) channels are shown, with dashed and solid lines representing the progenitor phase before stripping and the subsequ… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Parameter distributions of primordial binaries that can evolve into He+MS binaries. Dots, triangles, and squares represent systems that will follow the Case A MT, Case B MT, and CE evolution channels, respectively. The color bar indicates the mass of the initial secondary star [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Number distributions of He+MS binaries as func￾tions of IMHeS mass and orbital period (top panel), binary masses (bottom panel) for the fiducial model (Model A). The marginal panels show the corresponding one-dimensional number distributions for systems evolving through the Case A MT (black), Case B MT (orange), and CE evolution (sky￾blue) channels. peaking at ∼ 5 M⊙. Given the extreme mass ratio, MT betwe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Hertzsprung-Russell diagram of the He+CO bi￾nary population for different CE ejection efficiencies αCE. Models A, G, and H correspond to αCE = 1, 3 and 5, respec￾tively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Similar to model A in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Formation channels for single IMHeS. These in￾clude: (1) the merger channel, where a binary merges during a failed CE ejection or through the merger of two He stars; (2) the Type Ia SN channel, where a thermonuclear explosion of a WD disrupts the binary; and (3) the disruption channel, where an asymmetric core-collapse SN imparts a natal kick that unbinds the system. The Single IMHeS discussed here refers… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Mass distribution of single IMHeS from our fiducial model. These three channels produce single IMHeS with slightly different properties on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Helium stars stripped of their hydrogen envelopes represent pivotal phases in binary evolution, yet their origins, particularly within the intermediate-mass range of $2-8\, M_{\odot}$, still remain poorly understood. This population bridges the gap between low-mass hot subdwarfs and massive Wolf-Rayet stars, but has remained largely unobserved. In this study, we employ binary population synthesis to systematically investigate the formation and properties of intermediate-mass helium stars (IMHeS) across various galactic metallicities. Our results indicate that metallicity and common-envelope ejection efficiency are the dominant factors shaping the IMHeS population. We estimate that several thousand IMHeS exist in the Milky Way, with several hundred more in the Magellanic Clouds. The vast majority of IMHeS reside in binaries, with fewer than $10\%$ appearing as single stars. Among IMHeS binaries, $\gtrsim 50\%$ are expected to have main-sequence companions, and the remainder host compact companions (including helium stars, white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes). The former systems form mainly through stable mass transfer, whereas the latter arise predominantly from common envelope evolution. Our work provides quantitative predictions for the populations of these elusive stars formed through binary interactions and offers guidance for future observational searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper employs binary population synthesis to investigate the formation channels and galactic populations of intermediate-mass helium stars (IMHeS) in the 2–8 M⊙ range. It identifies metallicity and common-envelope ejection efficiency as the dominant parameters, estimates several thousand IMHeS in the Milky Way and several hundred in the Magellanic Clouds, and reports that the vast majority (>90%) reside in binaries, with ≥50% having main-sequence companions and the rest hosting compact objects; stable mass transfer and common-envelope evolution are the respective formation routes.

Significance. If the quantitative population estimates and binary fractions hold after validation, the work would supply useful order-of-magnitude predictions for an observationally elusive transitional population, thereby guiding targeted searches in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds and highlighting the role of binary interactions between the hot-subdwarf and Wolf-Rayet regimes. The explicit separation of formation channels by companion type is a constructive element.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The population estimates (several thousand IMHeS in the Milky Way, <10% single) and the binary-companion breakdown rest on standard BPS prescriptions for mass-transfer stability and common-envelope ejection whose calibration is not demonstrated for the 2–8 M⊙ regime. Because the abstract itself states that common-envelope ejection efficiency is a dominant factor, the lack of a dedicated sensitivity study or comparison to observed systems in this mass range makes the headline numbers sensitive to untested assumptions about envelope binding energy and thermal response.
  2. [Methods and Results] No specific parameter grids, adopted values of α_CE, or error estimates on the birth rates are supplied, preventing assessment of whether the quoted numbers are robust predictions or largely set by the choice of the free parameter identified as dominant.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it named the binary population synthesis code and briefly indicated the range of metallicities explored.
  2. Notation for solar masses is inconsistent in the provided text (M_⊙ vs. M⊙); a uniform style should be adopted throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve the presentation of our methods and the robustness of the reported population estimates.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] The population estimates (several thousand IMHeS in the Milky Way, <10% single) and the binary-companion breakdown rest on standard BPS prescriptions for mass-transfer stability and common-envelope ejection whose calibration is not demonstrated for the 2–8 M⊙ regime. Because the abstract itself states that common-envelope ejection efficiency is a dominant factor, the lack of a dedicated sensitivity study or comparison to observed systems in this mass range makes the headline numbers sensitive to untested assumptions about envelope binding energy and thermal response.

    Authors: We agree that the headline population numbers are sensitive to the choice of BPS prescriptions, particularly for common-envelope ejection in the intermediate-mass regime. While our explorations across metallicities already indicated that CE efficiency is a dominant parameter, the current manuscript does not include an explicit sensitivity study or tabulated comparisons to observed systems. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) presenting results for a range of α_CE values, discuss the adopted envelope binding-energy prescriptions, and note any relevant observational constraints available for this mass range. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods and Results] No specific parameter grids, adopted values of α_CE, or error estimates on the birth rates are supplied, preventing assessment of whether the quoted numbers are robust predictions or largely set by the choice of the free parameter identified as dominant.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not supply the detailed parameter grids or adopted α_CE values used in the population synthesis runs. In the revision we will include a table or section listing the initial parameter ranges, the specific α_CE values explored, and quantitative estimates (or ranges) for the birth rates that reflect the variation with the dominant parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies binary population synthesis as a forward-modeling framework to explore IMHeS formation channels, identifying metallicity and common-envelope ejection efficiency as dominant parameters through variation in the simulations. The quoted population estimates (several thousand in the Milky Way) are presented as direct outputs of this computational synthesis rather than quantities fitted to the target population itself or defined in terms of the results. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in the abstract that would reduce the central claims to prior author work or to the inputs by construction. The derivation remains self-contained as standard BPS modeling with stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

All quantitative claims rest on parameterized binary evolution physics whose accuracy is assumed rather than independently verified within the work.

free parameters (1)
  • common-envelope ejection efficiency
    Explicitly named as one of the two dominant factors controlling the IMHeS population, indicating it is varied as a key model input.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard binary population synthesis prescriptions for mass transfer and common-envelope evolution apply to the 2-8 solar mass range.
    This assumption enables all formation-channel and population-size predictions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5783 in / 1227 out tokens · 67233 ms · 2026-05-19T20:17:32.915504+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    G., Abbott, R., Abouelfettouh, I., et al

    Abac, A. G., Abbott, R., Abouelfettouh, I., et al. 2024, Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star, ApJL, 970, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5beb

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5beb 2024

  2. [2]

    L., et al

    Belczynski, K., Bulik, T., Fryer, C. L., et al. 2010, On the Maximum Mass of Stellar Black Holes, ApJ, 714, 1217, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1217

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/2/1217 2010

  3. [3]

    R., & G¨ otberg, Y

    Blomberg, L., El-Badry, K., Ludwig, B., Drout, M. R., & G¨ otberg, Y. 2026, Intermediate-mass Stripped Stars in the Magellanic Clouds: Forward Modeling the Observed Population Discovered Via UV Excess, PASP, 138, 024202, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ae3a19

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae3a19 2026

  4. [4]

    A., & Veljanoski, J

    Breddels, M. A., & Veljanoski, J. 2018, Vaex: big data exploration in the era of Gaia, A&A, 618, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732493

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732493 2018

  5. [5]

    Brown, G. E. 1995, Neutron Star Accretion and Binary Pulsar Formation, ApJ, 440, 270, doi: 10.1086/175268

    work page doi:10.1086/175268 1995

  6. [6]

    Crowther, P. A. 2007, Physical Properties of Wolf-Rayet

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Stars, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 45, 177, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615

  8. [8]

    2022, A Study of Magnetized White Dwarf + Helium Star Binary Evolution to Type Ia

    Cui, Z., & Li, X.-D. 2022, A Study of Magnetized White Dwarf + Helium Star Binary Evolution to Type Ia

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Supernovae, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 025001, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac3744

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac3744

  10. [10]

    2022, The population of hot subdwarf stars studied with Gaia

    Culpan, R., Geier, S., Reindl, N., et al. 2022, The population of hot subdwarf stars studied with Gaia. IV. Catalogues of hot subluminous stars based on Gaia EDR3, A&A, 662, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243337

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243337 2022

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Davis, P. J., Kolb, U., & Willems, B. 2010, A comprehensive population synthesis study of post-common envelope binaries, MNRAS, 403, 179, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16138.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16138.x 2010

  12. [12]

    M., Ofek, E

    De, K., Kasliwal, M. M., Ofek, E. O., et al. 2018, A hot and fast ultra-stripped supernova that likely formed a compact neutron star binary, Science, 362, 201, doi: 10.1126/science.aas8693

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aas8693 2018

  13. [13]

    2024, On the Formation of Double Neutron Stars in the Milky Way: Influence of Key Parameters, ApJ, 963, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2357 14

    Deng, Z.-L., Li, X.-D., Shao, Y., & Xu, K. 2024, On the Formation of Double Neutron Stars in the Milky Way: Influence of Key Parameters, ApJ, 963, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2357 14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2357 2024

  14. [14]

    2006, Evolutionary Synthesis Models of Young Star-forming Regions: The Influence of Binary Stars, ApJ, 641, 252, doi: 10.1086/500380

    Dionne, D., & Robert, C. 2006, Evolutionary Synthesis Models of Young Star-forming Regions: The Influence of Binary Stars, ApJ, 641, 252, doi: 10.1086/500380

    work page doi:10.1086/500380 2006

  15. [15]

    2021, The effects of binary stars on galaxies and metal-enriched gas during reionization, MNRAS, 505, 2207, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1448

    Doughty, C., & Finlator, K. 2021, The effects of binary stars on galaxies and metal-enriched gas during reionization, MNRAS, 505, 2207, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1448

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1448 2021

  16. [16]

    R., G¨ otberg, Y., Ludwig, B

    Drout, M. R., G¨ otberg, Y., Ludwig, B. A., et al. 2023, An observed population of intermediate-mass helium stars that have been stripped in binaries, Science, 382, 1287, doi: 10.1126/science.ade4970

    work page doi:10.1126/science.ade4970 2023

  17. [17]

    2024, Evolutionary nature of puffed-up stripped star binaries and their occurrence in stellar populations, A&A, 687, A215, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349065

    Dutta, D., & Klencki, J. 2024, Evolutionary nature of puffed-up stripped star binaries and their occurrence in stellar populations, A&A, 687, A215, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349065

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349065 2024

  18. [18]

    2026, The demographics of core-collapse supernovae: The role of binary evolution and interaction with the circumstellar medium, A&A, 706, A169, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557572

    Ercolino, A., Jin, H., Langer, N., et al. 2026, The demographics of core-collapse supernovae: The role of binary evolution and interaction with the circumstellar medium, A&A, 706, A169, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557572

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557572 2026

  19. [19]

    J., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., et al

    Fragos, T., Andrews, J. J., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., et al. 2019, The Complete Evolution of a Neutron-star Binary through a Common Envelope Phase Using 1D Hydrodynamic Simulations, ApJL, 883, L45, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab40d1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab40d1 2019

  20. [20]

    L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al

    Fryer, C. L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al. 2012, Compact Remnant Mass Function: Dependence on the Explosion Mechanism and Metallicity, ApJ, 749, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/91 2012

  21. [21]

    2020, The population of hot subdwarf stars studied with Gaia

    Geier, S. 2020, The population of hot subdwarf stars studied with Gaia. III. Catalogue of known hot subdwarf stars: Data Release 2, A&A, 635, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037526

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037526 2020

  22. [22]

    2023, Ups!

    Gilkis, A., & Shenar, T. 2023, Ups!... I did it again: unveiling the hidden companion in Upsilon Sagittarii, a unique binary system at a second mass transfer stage, MNRAS, 518, 3541, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3375 G¨ otberg, Y., de Mink, S. E., Groh, J. H., et al. 2018, Spectral models for binary products: Unifying subdwarfs and Wolf-Rayet stars as a sequenc...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3375 2023

  23. [23]

    2024, Electron-capture supernovae in NS + He star systems and the double neutron star systems, MNRAS, 530, 4461, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1112

    Guo, Y.-L., Wang, B., Chen, W.-C., et al. 2024, Electron-capture supernovae in NS + He star systems and the double neutron star systems, MNRAS, 530, 4461, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1112

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1112 2024

  24. [24]

    2014, The Wolf-Rayet stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Hainich, R., R¨ uhling, U., Todt, H., et al. 2014, The Wolf-Rayet stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A comprehensive analysis of the WN class, A&A, 565, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322696

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322696 2014

  25. [25]

    Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, P., Maxted, P. F. L., Marsh, T. R., & Ivanova, N. 2002, The origin of subdwarf B stars - I. The formation channels, MNRAS, 336, 449, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05752.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05752.x 2002

  26. [26]

    R.et al.Array programming with NumPy.Nature585, 357–362, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 (2020)

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Array programming with NumPy, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  27. [27]

    2009, The Star Formation History of the Large Magellanic Cloud, AJ, 138, 1243, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243

    Harris, J., & Zaritsky, D. 2009, The Star Formation History of the Large Magellanic Cloud, AJ, 138, 1243, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243 2009

  28. [28]

    2009, Hot Subdwarf Stars, ARA&A, 47, 211, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101836

    Heber, U. 2009, Hot Subdwarf Stars, ARA&A, 47, 211, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101836

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101836 2009

  29. [29]

    2025, The mass distribution of stars stripped in binaries: The effect of metallicity, A&A, 697, A239, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453185

    Hovis-Afflerbach, B., G¨ otberg, Y., Schootemeijer, A., et al. 2025, The mass distribution of stars stripped in binaries: The effect of metallicity, A&A, 697, A239, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453185

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453185 2025

  30. [30]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Environment, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002

  33. [33]

    2022,γColumbae as a recently stripped pulsating core of a massive star, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1414, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01809-6

    Irrgang, A., Przybilla, N., & Meynet, G. 2022,γColumbae as a recently stripped pulsating core of a massive star, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1414, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01809-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01809-6 2022

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Kiel, P. D., & Hurley, J. R. 2006, Populating the Galaxy with low-mass X-ray binaries, MNRAS, 369, 1152, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10400.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10400.x 2006

  35. [35]

    Results at z=0

    Kroupa, P. 2001, On the variation of the initial mass function, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001

  36. [36]

    A., & Gilmore, G

    Kroupa, P., Tout, C. A., & Gilmore, G. 1993, The Distribution of Low-Mass Stars in the Galactic Disc, MNRAS, 262, 545, doi: 10.1093/mnras/262.3.545

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.545 1993

  37. [37]

    2024, Ultraluminous X-ray sources with He star companions, MNRAS, 534, 3400, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2322

    Li, L., Wang, B., Liu, D., et al. 2024, Ultraluminous X-ray sources with He star companions, MNRAS, 534, 3400, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2322

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2322 2024

  38. [38]

    C., & Newman, J

    Licquia, T. C., & Newman, J. A. 2015, Improved Estimates of the Milky Way’s Stellar Mass and Star Formation Rate from Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis, ApJ, 806, 96, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/96 15

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/96 2015

  39. [39]

    2005, Hot subdwarfs from the ESO Supernova Ia Progenitor Survey

    Lisker, T., Heber, U., Napiwotzki, R., et al. 2005, Hot subdwarfs from the ESO Supernova Ia Progenitor Survey. I. Atmospheric parameters and cool companions of sdB stars, A&A, 430, 223, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040232 2005

  40. [40]

    2026, The Stripped-star Ultraviolet Magellanic Cloud Survey (SUMS): The Ultraviolet Photometric Catalog and Stripped-star Candidate

    Laroche, A. 2026, The Stripped-star Ultraviolet Magellanic Cloud Survey (SUMS): The Ultraviolet Photometric Catalog and Stripped-star Candidate

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    Selection, ApJ, 999, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2d13

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2d13

  42. [42]

    2020, Simple recipes for compact remnant masses and natal kicks, MNRAS, 499, 3214, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3043

    Mandel, I., & M¨ uller, B. 2020, Simple recipes for compact remnant masses and natal kicks, MNRAS, 499, 3214, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3043

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3043 2020

  43. [43]

    M., Dufton, P

    McEvoy, C. M., Dufton, P. L., Evans, C. J., et al. 2015, The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. XIX. B-type supergiants: Atmospheric parameters and nitrogen abundances to investigate the role of binarity and the width of the main sequence, A&A, 575, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425202

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425202 2015

  44. [44]

    2025, Modeling High Mass X-Ray Binaries to Double Neutron Stars through Common Envelope Evolution, ApJ, 979, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a65

    Nie, Y.-D., Shao, Y., He, J.-G., et al. 2025, Modeling High Mass X-Ray Binaries to Double Neutron Stars through Common Envelope Evolution, ApJ, 979, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a65

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a65 2025

  45. [45]

    Offner, S. S. R., Moe, M., Kratter, K. M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.10066 2023

  46. [46]

    2011 , keywords =

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA), ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 2011

  47. [47]

    Podsiadlowski, P., Langer, N., Poelarends, A. J. T., et al. 2004, The Effects of Binary Evolution on the Dynamics of Core Collapse and Neutron Star Kicks, ApJ, 612, 1044, doi: 10.1086/421713

    work page doi:10.1086/421713 2004

  48. [48]

    Poelarends, A. J. T., Wurtz, S., Tarka, J., Cole Adams, L., & Hills, S. T. 2017, Electron Capture Supernovae from Close Binary Systems, ApJ, 850, 197, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa988a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa988a 2017

  49. [49]

    Pols, O. R. 1994, Case A evolution of massive close binaries: formation of contact systems and possible reversal of the supernova order, A&A, 290, 119

    work page 1994

  50. [50]

    Ramachandran, V., Klencki, J., Sander, A. A. C., et al. 2023, A partially stripped massive star in a Be binary at low metallicity. A missing link towards Be X-ray binaries and double neutron star mergers, A&A, 674, L12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346818

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346818 2023

  51. [51]

    2015, The VMC survey - XIV

    Rubele, S., Girardi, L., Kerber, L., et al. 2015, The VMC survey - XIV. First results on the look-back time star formation rate tomography of the Small Magellanic

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Cloud, MNRAS, 449, 639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv141

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv141

  53. [53]

    Salpeter, E. E. 1955, The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution., ApJ, 121, 161, doi: 10.1086/145971 Sch¨ urmann, C., Xu, X.-T., Langer, N., et al. 2025, Populations of evolved massive binary stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud: II. Predictions from rapid binary evolution, A&A, 704, A219, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554874

    work page doi:10.1086/145971 1955

  54. [54]

    2025, X-ray emission from helium star–black hole binaries as probes of tidally induced spin-up of second-born black holes, A&A, 696, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553829

    Sen, K., Olejak, A., & Banerjee, S. 2025, X-ray emission from helium star–black hole binaries as probes of tidally induced spin-up of second-born black holes, A&A, 696, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553829

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553829 2025

  55. [55]

    2022, On the Neutron Star/Black Hole Mass Gap and Black Hole Searches, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 122002, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac995e

    Shao, Y. 2022, On the Neutron Star/Black Hole Mass Gap and Black Hole Searches, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 122002, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac995e

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac995e 2022

  56. [56]

    2014, On the Formation of Be Stars through Binary Interaction, ApJ, 796, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/37

    Shao, Y., & Li, X.-D. 2014, On the Formation of Be Stars through Binary Interaction, ApJ, 796, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/37

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/796/1/37 2014

  57. [57]

    2020, Population Synthesis of Black Hole X-Ray Binaries, ApJ, 898, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba118

    Shao, Y., & Li, X.-D. 2020, Population Synthesis of Black Hole X-Ray Binaries, ApJ, 898, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba118

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba118 2020

  58. [58]

    2021, Population Synthesis of Galactic Be-star Binaries with a Helium-star Companion, ApJ, 908, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd2b4

    Shao, Y., & Li, X.-D. 2021, Population Synthesis of Galactic Be-star Binaries with a Helium-star Companion, ApJ, 908, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd2b4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd2b4 2021

  59. [59]

    2021, Population Synthesis of Black Hole Binaries with Compact Star Companions, ApJ, 920, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac173e

    Shao, Y., & Li, X.-D. 2021, Population Synthesis of Black Hole Binaries with Compact Star Companions, ApJ, 920, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac173e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac173e 2021

  60. [60]

    2019, A Population of Neutron Star Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources with a Helium Star Companion, ApJ, 886, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4d50

    Shao, Y., Li, X.-D., & Dai, Z.-G. 2019, A Population of Neutron Star Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources with a Helium Star Companion, ApJ, 886, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4d50

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4d50 2019

  61. [61]

    2024, Wolf-Rayet stars, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04436

    Shenar, T. 2024, Wolf-Rayet stars, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04436

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    2020, The “hidden” companion in LB-1 unveiled by spectral disentangling, A&A, 639, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038275

    Shenar, T., Bodensteiner, J., Abdul-Masih, M., et al. 2020, The “hidden” companion in LB-1 unveiled by spectral disentangling, A&A, 639, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038275

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038275 2020

  63. [63]

    A., Marchant, P., et al

    Shenar, T., Wade, G. A., Marchant, P., et al. 2023, A massive helium star with a sufficiently strong magnetic field to form a magnetar, Science, 381, 761, doi: 10.1126/science.ade3293

    work page doi:10.1126/science.ade3293 2023

  64. [64]

    2007, Hot subdwarfs from the ESO supernova Ia progenitor survey

    Stroeer, A., Heber, U., Lisker, T., et al. 2007, Hot subdwarfs from the ESO supernova Ia progenitor survey. II. Atmospheric parameters of subdwarf O stars, A&A, 462, 269, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065564

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065564 2007

  65. [65]

    M., Langer, N., & Podsiadlowski, P

    Tauris, T. M., Langer, N., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2015, Ultra-stripped supernovae: progenitors and fate, MNRAS, 451, 2123, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv990

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv990 2015

  66. [66]

    M., Kramer, M., Freire, P

    Tauris, T. M., Kramer, M., Freire, P. C. C., et al. 2017, Formation of Double Neutron Star Systems, ApJ, 846, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89 16 The pandas development Team. 2025, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas,, v2.3.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e89 2017

  67. [67]

    Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., Prusti, T., et al. 2023, GaiaData Release 3: Summary of the content and survey properties, Astronomy &; Astrophysics, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 2023

  68. [68]

    E., Justham, S., et al

    Valli, R., de Mink, S. E., Justham, S., et al. 2025, Evidence of polar and ultralow supernova kicks from the orbits of Be X-ray binaries, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.08857, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08857 Villase˜ nor, J. I., Lennon, D. J., Picco, A., et al. 2023, The B-type Binaries Characterisation Programme - II. VFTS 291: a stripped star from a recent m...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.08857 2025

  69. [69]

    Vink, J. S. 2017, Winds from stripped low-mass helium stars and Wolf-Rayet stars, A&A, 607, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731902

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731902 2017

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    Wang, B., Meng, X., Chen, X., & Han, Z. 2009, The helium star donor channel for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae, MNRAS, 395, 847, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14545.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14545.x 2009

  71. [71]

    2016, The binding energy parameter for common envelope evolution, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 126, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/16/8/126

    Wang, C., Jia, K., & Li, X.-D. 2016, The binding energy parameter for common envelope evolution, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 126, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/16/8/126

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/16/8/126 2016

  72. [72]

    2024, Stripped Helium Star and Compact Object Binaries in Coeval Populations: Predictions Based on Detailed Binary Evolution Models, ApJL, 975, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad86b7

    Wang, C., Bodensteiner, J., Xu, X.-T., et al. 2024, Stripped Helium Star and Compact Object Binaries in Coeval Populations: Predictions Based on Detailed Binary Evolution Models, ApJL, 975, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad86b7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad86b7 2024

  73. [73]

    2024, IC 10 X-1: A Double Black Hole Progenitor Probably Formed through Stable Mass Transfer, ApJ, 974, 184, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad701a

    Wang, G.-Y., Shao, Y., He, J.-G., Xu, X.-J., & Li, X.-D. 2024, IC 10 X-1: A Double Black Hole Progenitor Probably Formed through Stable Mass Transfer, ApJ, 974, 184, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad701a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad701a 2024

  74. [74]

    2024, A potential mass-gap black hole in a wide binary with a circular orbit, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1583, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02359-9

    Wang, S., Zhao, X., Feng, F., et al. 2024, A potential mass-gap black hole in a wide binary with a circular orbit, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1583, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02359-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02359-9 2024

  75. [75]

    2023, mwaskom/seaborn: v0.13.0 (September 2023),, v0.13.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.592845

    Waskom, M., Gelbart, M., Botvinnik, O., et al. 2023, mwaskom/seaborn: v0.13.0 (September 2023),, v0.13.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.592845

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.592845 2023

  76. [76]

    Webbink, R. F. 1984, Double white dwarfs as progenitors of R Coronae Borealis stars and type I supernovae., ApJ, 277, 355, doi: 10.1086/161701

    work page doi:10.1086/161701 1984

  77. [77]

    2010, ON THE BINDING ENERGY PARAMETERλOF COMMON ENVELOPE

    Xu, X.-J., & Li, X.-D. 2010, ON THE BINDING ENERGY PARAMETERλOF COMMON ENVELOPE

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    EVOLUTION, The Astrophysical Journal, 716, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/114

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/114

  79. [79]

    2025, Populations of evolved massive binary stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud: I

    Xu, X.-T., Sch¨ urmann, C., Langer, N., et al. 2025, Populations of evolved massive binary stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud: I. Predictions from detailed evolution models, A&A, 704, A218, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554786

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554786 2025

  80. [80]

    2024, Elusive hot stripped helium stars in the Galaxy

    Yungelson, L., Kuranov, A., Postnov, K., et al. 2024, Elusive hot stripped helium stars in the Galaxy. I. Evolutionary stellar models in the gap between subdwarfs and Wolf-Rayet stars, A&A, 683, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347806

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347806 2024

Showing first 80 references.