pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18628 · v1 · pith:MQ3W7OPYnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.supr-con

Field Theory Models for a Holographic Superconductor in Two Dimensions

Salvatore Santoro , Roberto Auzzi , Stefano Bolognesi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 09:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.supr-con
keywords holographic superconductortwo-dimensional CFTmodular invariancedouble-trace perturbationRobin boundary conditionGinzburg-Landau theoryfractional flux vorticesLittle-Parks effect
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modular invariance relates the high- and low-temperature phases of a two-dimensional CFT deformed by a double-trace perturbation, reproducing the zero-winding sector of a holographic superconductor.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs field theory models for holographic superconductors in two dimensions where condensation arises from a Robin boundary condition. Under the assumption of large-c factorization, the authors examine the phase diagram of a CFT deformed by a relevant double-trace perturbation. They apply modular invariance to connect the high-temperature and low-temperature regimes, thereby obtaining an analytic match to the holographic results in the zero-winding sector. The near-critical condensate is shown to agree with an effective Ginzburg-Landau description, and a toy model is introduced to capture vortices carrying fractional magnetic flux, interpreted as a fractional Little-Parks effect.

Core claim

Assuming large-c factorization, the phase diagram of a two-dimensional CFT deformed by a relevant double-trace perturbation is studied. Modular invariance is used to relate the high- and low-temperature phases, reproducing analytically the results for the zero-winding sector of the holographic model. The near-critical behaviour of the condensate is matched to an effective Ginzburg-Landau field theory description. A field theory toy model with vortices carrying fractional magnetic flux is investigated and interpreted as a fractional Little-Parks effect.

What carries the argument

Modular invariance of the deformed two-dimensional CFT, which relates high- and low-temperature phases under the large-c factorization assumption.

If this is right

  • The high- and low-temperature phases of the deformed CFT become analytically related through modular invariance.
  • Near-critical condensate behaviour is described by an effective Ginzburg-Landau theory.
  • A toy field theory model exhibits vortices with fractional magnetic flux matching the holographic case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar modular-invariance mappings could be tested in other relevant deformations of two-dimensional CFTs that admit holographic duals.
  • The fractional Little-Parks effect in the toy model suggests possible signatures in mesoscopic superconducting rings or engineered 2D materials.
  • Extensions to nonzero winding sectors might require additional boundary conditions or higher-genus modular transformations.

Load-bearing premise

Large-c factorization holds when studying the phase diagram of the two-dimensional CFT deformed by a relevant double-trace perturbation.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the condensate or free energy in the low-temperature phase that deviates from the modular-invariance prediction without invoking large-c factorization would falsify the analytic reproduction of the holographic zero-winding results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18628 by Roberto Auzzi, Salvatore Santoro, Stefano Bolognesi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In these plots [11] we show κ as a function of αH for the vacuum and n = 1, 2, 3 vortices. Here we set m2 = −0.9 and G = 0.1. In the left panel we set e = 0, while in the right panel we consider e = 10. Black holes realize naturally the periodicity n → n + p, a(r) → a(r) + p which is valid for the equations and the boundary conditions too. This is interpreted as the periodicity in the Little-Parks effect i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Here we plot the normalized flux e ΦB/(2π) = a0/n as a function of αH for the n = 1, 2 vortex solutions [11]. Here we set e = 10, m2 = −0.9 and GN = 0.1. this case, the superconducting transition is second order, and the critical coupling κ can be found from an analytical solution in the limit of zero backreaction κ(n) = Γ(∆ − 1) Γ(1 − ∆) " Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase diagram for n = 0 with m2 = −0.9 (corresponding to ∆ = 0.68) and GN = 0.1 [11]. There are four lines departing from a quadruple point dividing the diagram into four distinct phases. For sufficiently small |κ| there is no scalar condensate. In this region the two possible solutions are the BTZ black hole and thermal AdS, with a first order Hawking-Page transition [34] between the two geometries at T =… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic phase diagram in the (−f, T) plane under the assumptions discussed in this subsection, with the scaling dimension fixed to ∆ = 1 − √ 0.1. The superconducting transition separates the normal and condensed phases. In the normal phase, the horizontal line TSD = 1/L is the self-dual transition, which separates the two modularly related thermal regimes. The continuation of this line inside the condens… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the holographic condensate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quartic coefficients extracted from the holographic condensate as functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase diagram of the field theory model in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plots of aR n , w v and E for v = 1, V = 10, R = 1 and λ = 50. Bint = Bext and Aθ(r) = Bextr 2 everywhere. Solving the bulk equations we have in general Aθ = ( a r 2 R , r ∈ (0, R) αr2 + β, r ∈ (R, RIR) (4.14) with α = Bext − a R R2 IR 1 − R2 R2 IR , β = aR − αR2 (4.15) 36 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Geometry of the circular wire of radius R in an external magnetic field. The IR radius RIR is used to set the boundary conditions for the external magnetic field. where we imposed that the magnetic field outside is Bext and Aθ is continuous on the wire. There may be a discontinuity in the derivative of Aθ in R; this can produce a difference between the internal and external magnetic field. The total energy… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plots of E1+1 for v = 0.2 and V = 0.2 (left) or V = 0.2 √ 2 (right). In this case apart from the usual LP periodicity there are states with 1/2 flux (left) or 1/3 flux (right). energy E1+1 at zero Bint − Bext is always minimized by the integer flux states. This remains true even changing v V . The Little-Park periodicity corresponds to (n, m) → (n+k, m+k) both translated by the same integer k ∈ Z. For sol… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate field theory models of holographic superconductors in which the condensation of the order parameter is induced by a Robin boundary condition. Assuming large-$c$ factorization, we study the phase diagram of a two-dimensional CFT deformed by a relevant double-trace perturbation. Using modular invariance, we relate the high- and low-temperature phases, reproducing analytically the results for the zero-winding sector of the holographic model. Moreover, we match the near-critical behaviour of the condensate with an effective Ginzburg--Landau field theory description. Another important feature of the holographic superconductor is the presence of vortices that carry fractional magnetic flux. We investigate a field theory toy model with similar properties and interpret it as a fractional Little--Parks effect.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates field theory models of holographic superconductors in two dimensions. Assuming large-c factorization, it studies the phase diagram of a 2D CFT deformed by a relevant double-trace perturbation. Using modular invariance, it relates high- and low-temperature phases to analytically reproduce the zero-winding sector of the holographic model. It further matches the near-critical condensate behavior to an effective Ginzburg-Landau description and examines a toy model for vortices with fractional magnetic flux, interpreted as a fractional Little-Parks effect.

Significance. If the central claims hold under the stated assumptions, the work provides an analytic CFT-based route to holographic superconductivity results in 2D by connecting temperature regimes through modular invariance, offering a potential bridge between field theory and gravity duals without direct gravitational computation. The Ginzburg-Landau matching and fractional flux toy model add phenomenological value if substantiated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that modular invariance analytically reproduces the zero-winding holographic results after a relevant double-trace deformation rests on large-c factorization. However, the deformation introduces an explicit scale that breaks conformal invariance, so the torus partition function Z(τ) need not obey the same SL(2,ℤ) transformations. A concrete derivation or parametric estimate demonstrating that factorization corrections remain small (rather than O(1)) near the deformation scale is required to support the high/low-T relation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that results are reproduced analytically but supplies no derivations, error estimates, or explicit checks; adding a short outline of the key modular map steps or a reference to the relevant section would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting an important subtlety regarding the applicability of modular invariance after the double-trace deformation. We address the major comment below and will incorporate clarifications into a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that modular invariance analytically reproduces the zero-winding holographic results after a relevant double-trace deformation rests on large-c factorization. However, the deformation introduces an explicit scale that breaks conformal invariance, so the torus partition function Z(τ) need not obey the same SL(2,ℤ) transformations. A concrete derivation or parametric estimate demonstrating that factorization corrections remain small (rather than O(1)) near the deformation scale is required to support the high/low-T relation.

    Authors: We agree that the relevant double-trace deformation introduces an explicit scale and thereby breaks conformal invariance of the original CFT, so that the full deformed partition function need not transform covariantly under SL(2,ℤ). Our analysis invokes modular invariance only for the undeformed large-c CFT and treats the deformation perturbatively through the boundary conditions and the effective potential for the order parameter. Under the maintained assumption of large-c factorization, connected correlators that could spoil the modular relation are suppressed by 1/c. We will revise the manuscript by adding a short paragraph (most naturally in Section 2) that supplies a parametric estimate: near the deformation scale set by the double-trace coupling, the leading factorization-violating corrections remain O(1/c) rather than O(1) throughout the temperature range where the zero-winding holographic results are reproduced. This addition will make the regime of validity explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via CFT assumptions

full rationale

The paper assumes large-c factorization as a starting point for analyzing the deformed CFT phase diagram and then applies modular invariance to relate high- and low-temperature regimes, yielding an analytic match to the zero-winding holographic sector. This constitutes an independent CFT-side calculation rather than a reduction of the output to the input by construction. No quoted equations or self-citations in the provided material show a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The reproduction is framed as a derived consequence, not an embedded tautology, and the central claim retains independent content from the field-theory modeling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the domain assumption of large-c factorization; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption large-c factorization
    Invoked to study the phase diagram of the deformed 2D CFT.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5651 in / 1239 out tokens · 51057 ms · 2026-05-20T09:22:20.024515+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Building an AdS/CFT superconductor

    Sean A. Hartnoll, Christopher P. Herzog, and Gary T. Horowitz. “Building a Holographic Superconductor”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008), p. 031601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 101.031601. arXiv:0803.3295 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2008

  2. [2]

    Holographic Superconductors

    Sean A. Hartnoll, Christopher P. Herzog, and Gary T. Horowitz. “Holographic Supercon- ductors”. In:JHEP12 (2008), p. 015.doi:10 . 1088 / 1126 - 6708 / 2008 / 12 / 015. arXiv: 0810.1563 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    There are no Goldstone bosons in two dimensions

    Sidney Coleman. “There are no Goldstone bosons in two dimensions”. In:Commun. Math. Phys.31 (1973), pp. 259–264.doi:10.1007/BF01646487. 44

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01646487 1973

  4. [4]

    Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner. “Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.17 (1966), pp. 1133–1136. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.17.1133 1966

  5. [5]

    Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions

    P. C. Hohenberg. “Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions”. In:Phys. Rev.158 (1967), pp. 383–386.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.158.383

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.158.383 1967

  6. [6]

    Superconductivity in one dimension

    A.D. Zaikin K.Yu. Arutyunov D.S. Golubev. “Superconductivity in one dimension”. In: Physics Reports464, Issues 1–2 (July 2008), pp. 1–70.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008. 04.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008 2008

  7. [7]

    Holography and the Coleman-Mermin-Wagner theorem

    Dionysios Anninos, Sean A. Hartnoll, and Nabil Iqbal. “Holography and the Coleman- Mermin-Wagner theorem”. In:Phys. Rev. D82 (2010), p. 066008.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 82.066008. arXiv:1005.1973 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd 2010

  8. [8]

    Holographic quantum liquids in 1+1 dimensions

    Ling-Yan Hung and Aninda Sinha. “Holographic quantum liquids in 1+1 dimensions”. In: JHEP01 (2010), p. 114.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2010)114. arXiv:0909.3526 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2010)114 2010

  9. [9]

    One-dimensional holographic superconductor from AdS_3/CFT_2 correspondence

    Jie Ren. “One-dimensional holographic superconductor from AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence”. In:JHEP11 (2010), p. 055.doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2010)055. arXiv:1008.3904 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2010)055 2010

  10. [10]

    Universal far-from-equilibrium Dynamics of a Holographic Superconductor

    Julian Sonner, Adolfo del Campo, and Wojciech H. Zurek. “Universal far-from-equilibrium Dynamics of a Holographic Superconductor”. In:Nature Commun.6 (2015), p. 7406.doi: 10.1038/ncomms8406. arXiv:1406.2329 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/ncomms8406 2015

  11. [11]

    Solitonic vortices and black holes with vortex hair in AdS 3

    Roberto Auzzi et al. “Solitonic vortices and black holes with vortex hair in AdS 3”. In:JHEP 06 (2025), p. 201.doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)201. arXiv:2502.20822 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2025)201 2025

  12. [12]

    Multi-Trace Operators, Boundary Conditions, And AdS/CFT Correspondence

    Edward Witten. “Multi-trace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS/CFT correspon- dence”. In:arXiv(2001). arXiv:hep-th/0112258 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  13. [14]

    Holographic quantum criticality from multi-trace deformations

    Thomas Faulkner, Gary T. Horowitz, and Matthew M. Roberts. “Holographic Quantum Criticality from Multi-Trace Deformations”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2011.04 (2011), p. 051.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)051. arXiv:1008.1581 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2011)051 2011

  14. [15]

    Black Hole Entropy from Near-Horizon Microstates

    Andrew Strominger. “Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates”. In:JHEP02 (1998), p. 009.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/009. arXiv:hep-th/9712251

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/009 1998

  15. [16]

    Emergent Spacetime and Holographic CFTs

    Sheer El-Showk and Kyriakos Papadodimas. “Emergent Spacetime and Holographic CFTs”. In:JHEP10 (2012), p. 106.doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)106. arXiv:1101.4163 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2012)106 2012

  16. [17]

    Black holes from CFT: Universality of correlators at large c

    Per Kraus, Allic Sivaramakrishnan, and River Snively. “Black holes from CFT: universality of correlators at largec”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2017.08 (2017), p. 084.doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2017)084. arXiv:1706.00771 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2017)084 2017

  17. [18]

    Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit

    Thomas Hartman, Christoph A. Keller, and Bogdan Stoica. “Universal Spectrum of 2d Con- formal Field Theory in the Large c Limit”. In:JHEP09 (2014), p. 118.doi:10 . 1007 / JHEP09(2014)118. arXiv:1405.5137 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [19]

    The Black Hole in Three Dimensional Space Time

    M. Ba˜ nados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli. “The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992), pp. 1849–1851.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1849. arXiv: hep-th/9204099 [hep-th]. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.1849 1992

  19. [20]

    Geometry of the 2+1 Black Hole

    M. Ba˜ nados et al. “Geometry of the (2+1) black hole”. In:Physical Review D48 (1993), pp. 1506–1525.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.1506. arXiv:gr-qc/9302012 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.1506 1993

  20. [21]

    Flux Periodicities and Quantum Hair on Holographic Superconductors

    Marc Montull et al. “Flux Periodicities and Quantum Hair on Holographic Superconductors”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011), p. 181601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.181601. arXiv: 1105.5392 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.181601 2011

  21. [22]

    Magnetic Response in the Holographic Insulator/Superconductor Transition

    Marc Montull et al. “Magnetic Response in the Holographic Insulator/Superconductor Tran- sition”. In:JHEP04 (2012), p. 135.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2012)135. arXiv:1202.0006 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2012)135 2012

  22. [23]

    Double-trace instability of BTZ black holes

    Oscar J. C. Dias, David Sola Gil, and Jorge E. Santos. “Double-trace instability of BTZ black holes”. In:arXiv preprint(Dec. 2025). arXiv:2512.16982 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [24]

    When AdS$_3$ Grows Hair: Boson Stars, Black Holes, and Double-Trace Deformations

    Oscar J. C. Dias, David Sola Gil, and Jorge E. Santos. “When AdS 3 Grows Hair: Boson Stars, Black Holes, and Double-Trace Deformations”. In:arXiv preprint(2026). arXiv:2605.04145 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [25]

    Vortices in holographic superfluids and superconductors as conformal defects

    ´Oscar J. C. Dias et al. “Vortices in holographic superfluids and superconductors as conformal defects”. In:JHEP04 (2014), p. 096.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)096. arXiv:1311.3673 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2014)096 2014

  25. [26]

    A falling magnetic monopole as a holographic local quench

    Nicolo Zenoni et al. “A falling magnetic monopole as a holographic local quench”. In:JHEP 11 (2021), p. 048.doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)048. arXiv:2106.13757 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)048 2021

  26. [27]

    Scalar Field Theory in the AdS/CFT Correspondence Revisited

    Pablo Minces and Victor O. Rivelles. “Scalar field theory in the AdS/CFT correspondence revisited”. In:Nuclear Physics B572 (2000), pp. 651–669.doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99) 00833-0. arXiv:hep-th/9907079 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99 2000

  27. [28]

    Double-trace deformations, mixed boundary con- ditions and functional determinants in AdS/CFT

    Thomas Hartman and Leonardo Rastelli. “Double-trace deformations, mixed boundary con- ditions and functional determinants in AdS/CFT”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics 2008.01 (2008), p. 019.doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2008/01/019. arXiv:hep- th/0602106 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126- 2008

  28. [29]

    Chiral anomalies and AdS/CMT in two dimensions

    Kristan Jensen. “Chiral anomalies and AdS/CMT in two dimensions”. In:JHEP01 (2011), p. 109.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2011)109. arXiv:1012.4831 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2011)109 2011

  29. [30]

    Nonexistence of baryon number for static black holes

    Jacob D. Bekenstein. “Nonexistence of baryon number for static black holes”. In:Phys. Rev. D5 (1972), pp. 1239–1246.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.5.1239

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.5.1239 1972

  30. [31]

    Lecture Notes on Holographic Renormalization

    Kostas Skenderis. “Lecture notes on holographic renormalization”. In:Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002), pp. 5849–5876.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/22/306. arXiv:hep-th/0209067 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/22/306 2002

  31. [32]

    Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT

    Ioannis Papadimitriou. “Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT”. In:JHEP05 (2007), p. 075.doi:10 . 1088 / 1126 - 6708/2007/05/075. arXiv:hep-th/0703152

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [33]

    Phases of planar AdS black holes with axionic charge

    Marco M. Caldarelli et al. “Phases of planar AdS black holes with axionic charge”. In:JHEP 04 (2017), p. 001.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2017)001. arXiv:1612.07214 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2017)001 2017

  33. [34]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,

    S.W. Hawking and Don N. Page. “Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter Space”. In:Commun. Math. Phys.87 (1983), p. 577.doi:10.1007/BF01208266. 46

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01208266 1983

  34. [35]

    Hawking-Page phase transition in BTZ black hole revis- ited

    M. Eune, W. Kim, and S. H. Yi. “Hawking-Page phase transition in BTZ black hole revis- ited”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2013.03 (2013), p. 020.doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2013 2013

  35. [36]

    arXiv:1301.0395 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [37]

    Holographic Superconductor/Insulator Transition at Zero Temperature

    Tatsuma Nishioka, Shinsei Ryu, and Tadashi Takayanagi. “Holographic Superconductor/Insulator Transition at Zero Temperature”. In:JHEP03 (2010), p. 131.doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2010 2010

  37. [38]

    arXiv:0911.0962 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [39]

    A universal result on central charges in the presence of double-trace deformations

    Steven S. Gubser and Igor R. Klebanov. “A universal result on central charges in the presence of double-trace deformations”. In:Nuclear Physics B656 (2003), pp. 23–36.doi:10.1016/ S0550-3213(03)00056-7. arXiv:hep-th/0212138 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  39. [40]

    Stability and boundedness in AdS/CFT with double trace deformations

    Steven Casper et al. “Stability and boundedness in AdS/CFT with double trace deforma- tions”. In:Modern Physics Letters A34 (2019), p. 1950138.doi:10.1142/S0217732319501384. arXiv:1709.00445 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732319501384 2019

  40. [41]

    Notes on Relevant, Irrelevant, Marginal and Extremal Double Trace Perturbations

    Massimo Porrati and Cedric C. Y. Yu. “Notes on relevant, irrelevant, marginal and extremal double trace perturbations”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2016.11 (2016), p. 040.doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2016)040. arXiv:1609.00353 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2016)040 2016

  41. [42]

    Double-trace deformation in open quantum field theory

    Xiangyi Meng. “Double-trace deformation in open quantum field theory”. In:Physical Re- view D104 (2021), p. 016016.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.016016. arXiv:2012.05379 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.016016 2021

  42. [43]

    Relaxation in Conformal Field Theory, Hawking-Page Transition, and Quasinormal/Normal Modes

    Danny Birmingham, Ivo Sachs, and Sergey N. Solodukhin. “Relaxation in Conformal Field Theory, Hawking-Page Transition, and Quasinormal/Normal Modes”. In:Physical Review D67 (2003), p. 104026.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 67 . 104026. arXiv:hep - th / 0212308 [hep-th]

    work page 2003

  43. [44]

    Restoring Unitarity in BTZ Black Hole

    Sergey N. Solodukhin. “Restoring Unitarity in BTZ Black Hole”. In:Physical Review D71 (2005), p. 064006.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.064006. arXiv:hep-th/0501053 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.064006 2005

  44. [45]

    Bateman Manuscript Project

    Arthur Erd´ elyi et al., eds.Tables of Integral Transforms, Volume I. Bateman Manuscript Project. Compiled by the staff of the Bateman Manuscript Project. New York: McGraw– Hill, 1954.url:https://authors.library.caltech.edu/records/mhd23-e0z22/latest

    work page 1954

  45. [46]

    Lecture notes

    Luis Apolo.Lecture 4: Holography andT ¯T. Lecture notes. Course on Holography andT ¯T deformations. 2022.url:https://lui-apolo.github.io/holography-TTbar/lectures/ Lecture4.pdf

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    $T\bar{T}$ deformed partition functions

    Shouvik Datta and Yunfeng Jiang. “T ¯Tdeformed partition functions”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2018.08 (2018), p. 106.doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2018)106. arXiv:1806.07426 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2018)106 2018

  47. [48]

    Modular invariance and uniqueness of $T\bar{T}$ deformed CFT

    Ofer Aharony et al. “Modular invariance and uniqueness ofT ¯Tdeformed CFT”. In:JHEP 01 (2019), p. 086.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)086. arXiv:1808.02492 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)086 2019

  48. [49]

    Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories

    John L. Cardy. “Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories”. In:Nuclear Physics B270 (1986), pp. 186–204.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90552-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90552-3 1986

  49. [50]

    Lecture notes, Interna- tional Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS)

    Pinaki Banerjee.ST 4 Lectures on Assorted Topics in AdS 3/CFT2. Lecture notes, Interna- tional Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS). Student Talks on Trending Topics in Theory (ST4), NISER, Bhubaneswar. 2018.url:https://home.icts.res.in/ ~pinaki/AdS3- CFT2_ST4.pdf. 47

    work page 2018

  50. [51]

    Lectures on black holes and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence

    Per Kraus. “Lectures on black holes and the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence”. In:Lect. Notes Phys.755 (2008), pp. 193–247.doi:10.1007/ 978- 3- 540- 79523- 0_4. arXiv:hep - th/ 0609074 [hep-th]

    work page 2008

  51. [52]

    Finite temperature corrections to black hole quasinormal modes from 2D CFT

    Sanchari Pal. “Finite temperature corrections to black hole quasinormal modes from 2D CFT”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2022.08 (2022), p. 150.doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022 2022

  52. [53]

    arXiv:2201.10264 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  53. [55]

    One-loop Partition Functions of 3D Gravity

    Simone Giombi, Alexander Maloney, and Xi Yin. “One-loop Partition Functions of 3D Grav- ity”. In:JHEP08 (2008), p. 007. arXiv:0804.1773 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [56]

    Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions

    Alexander Maloney and Edward Witten. “Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions”. In:JHEP02 (2010), p. 029.doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)029. arXiv:0712. 0155 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2010)029 2010

  55. [57]

    On the Theory of Superconductivity

    V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau. “On the Theory of Superconductivity”. In:Collected Papers of L. D. Landau. Ed. by D. ter Haar. English translation of Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1965, pp. 546–568.doi:10.1016/B978-0-08- 010586-4.50078-X

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08- 1950

  56. [58]

    Holographic model of superfluidity

    C. P. Herzog, P. K. Kovtun, and D. T. Son. “Holographic model of superfluidity”. In:Phys. Rev. D79 (2009), p. 066002.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 79 . 066002. arXiv:0809 . 4870 [hep-th]

    work page 2009

  57. [59]

    Emergent Gauge Fields in Holographic Superconductors

    Oriol Domenech et al. “Emergent Gauge Fields in Holographic Superconductors”. In:JHEP 08 (2010), p. 033.doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)033. arXiv:1005.1776 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2010)033 2010

  58. [60]

    The Ginzburg-Landau Theory of a Holographic Superconductor

    Lei Yin, Defu Hou, and Hai-cang Ren. “Ginzburg-Landau theory of a holographic super- conductor”. In:Phys. Rev. D91.2 (2015), p. 026003.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.026003. arXiv:1311.3847 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.026003 2015

  59. [61]

    Ginzburg-Landau effective action for a fluctuat- ing holographic superconductor

    Yanyan Bu, Mitsutoshi Fujita, and Shu Lin. “Ginzburg-Landau effective action for a fluctuat- ing holographic superconductor”. In:JHEP09 (2021), p. 168.doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2021 2021

  60. [62]

    arXiv:2106.00556 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  61. [63]

    What is the dual Ginzburg-Landau theory for holographic superconduc- tors?

    Makoto Natsuume. “What is the dual Ginzburg-Landau theory for holographic superconduc- tors?” In:PTEP2025.2 (2025), 023B08.doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaf018. arXiv:2407.13956 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaf018 2025

  62. [64]

    The dual Ginzburg-Landau theory for a holographic superconductor: Finite coupling corrections

    Makoto Natsuume. “The dual Ginzburg-Landau theory for a holographic superconductor: Finite coupling corrections”. In:JHEP11 (2024), p. 107.doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)107. arXiv:2409.18323 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)107 2024

  63. [65]

    David Brown and M

    J. David Brown and Marc Henneaux. “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity”. In:Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics104 (1986), pp. 207–226.doi:10.1007/BF01211590. 48

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01211590 1986