pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22210 · v1 · pith:XHLLNFULnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌀 gr-qc

Constraints on Schwarzschild Black Hole in a Generalized Dehnen-Type (1,4,γ) Dark Matter Halo via the S2 Star Orbit around Sgr A^star

Tursunali Xamidov , Sanjar Shaymatov , Qiang Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 05:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Schwarzschild black holeDehnen dark matter haloS2 star orbitSgr A*perihelion shiftMCMC constraintsdark matter distribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

S2 star observations constrain parameters of a Schwarzschild black hole in a generalized Dehnen dark matter halo.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the orbital equations and perihelion shift for a Schwarzschild black hole embedded in a fully generalized Dehnen-type (1,4,γ) dark matter halo. It then uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods to fit this model to observational data of the S2 star's orbit around Sgr A*, obtaining best-fit values and 95% upper bounds for the halo parameters gamma, rho_s, and r_s from two different datasets. A sympathetic reader cares because this provides a way to test the presence and properties of dark matter near the Milky Way's central supermassive black hole using high-precision stellar dynamics. The results indicate that current data can already place useful limits on such halo models, suggesting that future observations could further refine our understanding of the dark matter environment at galactic centers.

Core claim

The authors show that in the generalized Schwarzschild-Dehnen metric, the perihelion shift of the S2 star can be calculated and used in an MCMC analysis to constrain the dark matter halo parameters, resulting in best-fit values gamma = 1.18^{+1.03}_{-0.81} (1.23^{+1.01}_{-0.85}), rho_s = 0.37^{+0.42}_{-0.29} (0.31^{+0.44}_{-0.26}), r_s = 0.05^{+0.05}_{-0.03} (0.14^{+0.18}_{-0.10}) and 95% upper bounds gamma < 2.66 (2.67), rho_s < 0.93 (0.92), r_s < 0.16 (0.52) for the two datasets.

What carries the argument

The perihelion shift over one orbital period derived from the geodesic motion in the generalized metric that combines the Schwarzschild black hole with the Dehnen (1,4,γ) dark matter halo profile.

If this is right

  • Stellar orbit data can effectively limit the scale and density of dark matter halos around supermassive black holes.
  • The generalized gamma allows for more flexible modeling of dark matter distributions compared to fixed parameter cases.
  • The obtained upper bounds suggest that the dark matter halo around Sgr A* cannot be too dense or extended within the S2 orbit radius.
  • These constraints offer insights into the dark matter environment at the Milky Way's center.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying this method to orbits of other stars could yield tighter parameter bounds.
  • If the best-fit gamma near 1.2 holds, it may favor certain dark matter halo formation scenarios in galaxy simulations.
  • The approach could be extended to include spin or other black hole properties in more complex metrics.
  • Improved astrometric precision might quickly test these upper limits.

Load-bearing premise

The dominant observable effect on the S2 star orbit comes from the perihelion shift in this particular black hole plus dark matter halo spacetime, with other effects like gas or magnetic fields being negligible.

What would settle it

New high-precision measurements of the S2 star's orbital precession that deviate significantly from the values predicted by the MCMC best-fits, for instance a precession rate requiring gamma greater than 2.67 to match, would falsify the derived constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22210 by Qiang Wu, Sanjar Shaymatov, Tursunali Xamidov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Orbital motion and radial velocity of the S2 star around Sgr A*. The left panels show the astrometric trajectory in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Posterior distributions of the model parameters obtained from the MCMC analysis for Dataset 1. The contours [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Posterior distributions of the model parameters obtained from the MCMC analysis for Dataset 2. The contours [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The distribution of dark matter (DM) halo around supermassive black holes (BHs) may leave observable imprints on stellar dynamics near galactic centers. Motivated by this, we investigate the orbital motion of the S2 star in the spacetime of a recently derived generalized Schwarzschild BH solution embedded in a Dehnen-type $(1,4,\gamma)$ DM halo, considering it as a possible model for Sgr A$^{\star}$ at the center of the Milky Way. Unlike previous studies restricted to specific values of the halo parameter $\gamma$, the present solution describes the fully generalized case with arbitrary $\gamma$. We derive the corresponding equations of motion and obtain the associated perihelion shift over one orbital period. Using observational data of the S2 star, we constrain the parameters of the Schwarzschild--Dehnen BH-DM system through a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis. Our results yield the best-fit values $\gamma = 1.18^{+1.03}_{-0.81}$ $(1.23^{+1.01}_{-0.85})$, $\rho_s = 0.37^{+0.42}_{-0.29}$ $(0.31^{+0.44}_{-0.26})$, and $r_s = 0.05^{+0.05}_{-0.03}$ $(0.14^{+0.18}_{-0.10})$ for observational data of Do et al.~\cite{Do19} and Gillessen et al.~\cite{Gillessen17ApJ}, respectively. We further obtain the corresponding 95\% confidence upper bounds: $\gamma < 2.66$ $(2.67)$, $\rho_s < 0.93$ $(0.92)$, and $r_s < 0.16$ $(0.52)$. These results demonstrate that precise stellar orbit measurements can provide meaningful constraints on the DM halo distributions surrounding supermassive BHs and may offer insights into the DM environment of Sgr A$^{\star}$ at the center of the Milky Way.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives a generalized static spherically symmetric metric for a Schwarzschild black hole embedded in a Dehnen-type (1,4,γ) dark matter halo with arbitrary γ, obtains the geodesic equations and the analytic expression for the perihelion advance per radial period, and performs MCMC fitting of the three halo parameters (γ, ρ_s, r_s) to published S2 astrometric and radial-velocity data sets from Do et al. and Gillessen et al., reporting best-fit values and 95 % upper bounds.

Significance. If the metric construction and perihelion-shift formula are correct, the work supplies the first observational constraints on a fully generalized Dehnen (1,4,γ) halo around Sgr A* using S2 data. The extension beyond fixed-γ models and the direct use of high-precision stellar orbits constitute a concrete step toward using galactic-center dynamics to probe dark-matter distributions near supermassive black holes.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (perihelion-shift derivation): the integral expression for the azimuthal advance is standard, but the paper should explicitly state the numerical quadrature method and convergence criteria used to evaluate it for each MCMC sample.
  2. [MCMC analysis] MCMC section: the choice of priors on γ, ρ_s and r_s is not stated; adding this information (flat, log-flat, or physically motivated) would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Results] Table 1 and Figure 3: the two data sets produce noticeably different upper bounds on r_s (0.16 vs 0.52); a brief discussion of possible systematic differences between the Do et al. and Gillessen et al. data sets would strengthen the results section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful summary of our manuscript, the positive assessment of its significance, and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's description accurately reflects the derivation of the generalized metric, the perihelion-shift formula, and the MCMC constraints on the Dehnen halo parameters using S2 data. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper constructs the generalized Schwarzschild metric by integrating the given (1,4,γ) Dehnen density profile into the mass function and substituting into the standard static spherical line element. The perihelion shift is then obtained from the standard integral expression for azimuthal advance per radial period in the resulting spacetime. These steps are independent of the S2 observational data. The subsequent MCMC analysis fits the three halo parameters directly to external astrometric and radial-velocity datasets (Do et al. and Gillessen et al.), yielding best-fit values and upper bounds as constraints rather than any claimed first-principles prediction that reduces to the inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, self-definitional relations, or renamed known results appear in the derivation chain. The central results are therefore data-driven constraints on an externally specified model and remain self-contained against the paper's own equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on three fitted parameters and the assumption that the chosen metric correctly captures the DM halo effect on stellar orbits.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma
    Halo shape parameter fitted via MCMC to S2 data
  • rho_s
    Characteristic density scale fitted via MCMC
  • r_s
    Characteristic radius scale fitted via MCMC
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The spacetime metric is the generalized Schwarzschild solution embedded in a Dehnen-type (1,4,γ) DM halo
    Invoked as the background geometry for deriving orbital equations
  • domain assumption Perihelion shift is the primary observable imprint of the DM halo on the S2 orbit
    Used to connect the metric to the observational data
invented entities (1)
  • Generalized Dehnen-type (1,4,γ) DM halo no independent evidence
    purpose: To model the dark matter distribution surrounding the black hole
    Introduced as the specific halo profile whose parameters are constrained

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5940 in / 1609 out tokens · 41822 ms · 2026-05-22T05:37:45.237848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Do and et al., Science365, 664 (2019), arXiv:1907.10731 [astro-ph.GA]

    T. Do and et al., Science365, 664 (2019), arXiv:1907.10731 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    An Update on Monitoring Stellar Orbits in the Galactic Center

    S. Gillessen, P. M. Plewa, F. Eisenhauer, R. Sari, I. Waisberg, M. Habibi, O. Pfuhl, E. George, J. Dexter, S. von Fellenberg, T. Ott, and R. Genzel, Astrophys. J.837, 30 (2017), arXiv:1611.09144 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Einstein, Annalen der Physik354, 769 (1916)

    A. Einstein, Annalen der Physik354, 769 (1916)

    work page 1916

  4. [4]

    R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor, Astrophys. J191, L59 (1974)

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor, Astrophys. J195, L51 (1975)

    work page 1975

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott and et al. (Virgo and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott and et al. (Virgo and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    A. M. Ghez, B. L. Klein, M. Morris, and E. E. Becklin, Astrophys. J.509, 678 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9807210

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Akiyama and et al

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, Class. Quantum Gravity38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    P. J. Peebles and B. Ratra, Reviews of Modern Physics75, 559 (2003), astro-ph/0207347 . 9 a(mas) = 124.62+2.08 1.66 0.8832 0.8840 0.8848 0.8856 e e = 0.88+0.00 0.00 3.9 4.2 4.5 4.8 M(106Msun) M(106Msun) = 4.29+0.36 0.35 0.000 0.004 0.008 0.012 0.016 ta(yr) +1.9943e3 ta(yr) = 1994.31+0.00 0.00 8 4 0 4 8 x0(mas) x0(mas) = 0.59+6.68 6.92 2.4 1.6 0.8 0.0 y0(m...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    D. N. Spergel, R. Bean, and et al. (WMAP), Astrophys. J. Suppl.170, 377 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0603449 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    Wetterich, Nuclear Physics B302, 668 (1988)

    C. Wetterich, Nuclear Physics B302, 668 (1988)

    work page 1988

  16. [16]

    Caldwell and M

    R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Nature458, 587 (2009)

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    V. V. Kiselev, Class. Quantum Grav.20, 1187 (2003), gr-qc/0210040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    V. C. Rubin, J. Ford, W. K., and N. Thonnard, Astrophys. J.238, 471 (1980)

    work page 1980

  19. [19]

    The Universal Rotation Curve of Spiral Galaxies: I. the Dark Matter Connection

    M. Persic, P. Salucci, and F. Stel, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.281, 27 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9506004 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [20]

    Difficulties with Recovering The Masses of Supermassive Black Holes from Stellar Kinematical Data

    M. Valluri, D. Merritt, and E. Emsellem, Astrophys. J.602, 66 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0210379 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Scalar Dark Matter candidates

    C. Bœhm and P. Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B683, 219 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0305261 [hep-ph] . 10 a(mas) = 126.58+1.39 1.27 0.880 0.885 0.890 0.895 e e = 0.88+0.00 0.00 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 M(106Msun) M(106Msun) = 4.21+0.25 0.25 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.32 ta(yr) +1.994e3 ta(yr) = 1994.27+0.02 0.02 3.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 x0(mas) x0(mas) = 0.65+0.71 0.65 4 2 0 2 y0(mas) y0(mas) = 1.92+0...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rep.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, H. Tu, and H.-B. Yu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2009, 004 (2009), arXiv:0905.3039 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Schumann, J

    M. Schumann, J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys.46, 103003 (2019), arXiv:1903.03026 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    D. A. Brown, J. Brink, H. Fang, J. R. Gair, C. Li, G. Lovelace, I. Mandel, and K. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 201102 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0612060 [gr-qc] . 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Detecting Intermediate-Mass Ratio Inspirals From The Ground And Space

    P. Amaro-Seoane, Phys. Rev. D98, 063018 (2018), arXiv:1807.03824 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    V. C. Rubin and J. Ford, W. Kent, Astrophys. J.159, 379 (1970)

    work page 1970

  29. [29]

    A New Era in the Quest for Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and T. M. P. Tait, Nature562, 51 (2018), arXiv:1810.01668 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    The Extended Rotation Curve and the Dark Matter Halo of M33

    E. Corbelli and P. Salucci, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.311, 441 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9909252 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  31. [31]

    A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter

    D. Clowe, M. Bradaˇ c, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L109 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608407 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    A. A. Dutton and A. V. Macci` o, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.441, 3359–3374 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J.462, 563 (1996)

    work page 1996

  34. [34]

    Burkert, Astrophys

    A. Burkert, Astrophys. J.447(1995), 10.1086/309560

    work page doi:10.1086/309560 1995

  35. [35]

    Dehnen, Mon

    W. Dehnen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.265, 250 (1993)

    work page 1993

  36. [36]

    Astrophys.654, A53 (2021)

    Shukirgaliyev, B., Otebay, A., Sobolenko, M., Ishchenko, M., Borodina, O., Panamarev, T., Myrzakul, S., Kalambay, M., Naurzbayeva, A., Abdikamalov, E., Polyachenko, E., Banerjee, S., Berczik, P., Spurzem, R., and Just, A., Astron. Astrophys.654, A53 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    R. C. Pantig and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2022, 056 (2022), arXiv:2202.07404 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Al-Badawi, S

    A. Al-Badawi, S. Shaymatov, and Y. Sekhmani, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025, 014 (2025), arXiv:2411.01145 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Maeda, V

    K.-i. Maeda, V. Cardoso, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D111, 044060 (2025), arXiv:2410.04175 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Galactic Dark Matter in the Phantom Field

    M.-H. Li and K.-C. Yang, Phys. Rev. D86, 123015 (2012), arXiv:1204.3178 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Shaymatov, B

    S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, and M. Jamil, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 588 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Shaymatov, D

    S. Shaymatov, D. Malafarina, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Dark Universe34, 100891 (2021), arXiv:2004.06811 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Shaymatov, P

    S. Shaymatov, P. Sheoran, and S. Siwach, Phys. Rev. D105, 104059 (2022), arXiv:2110.10610 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    X. Hou, Z. Xu, M. Zhou, and J. Wang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2018, 015 (2018), arXiv:1804.08110 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Z. Shen, A. Wang, Y. Gong, and S. Yin, Phys. Lett. B855, 138797 (2024), arXiv:2311.12259 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Z. Shen, A. Wang, and S. Yin, Phys. Lett. B862, 139300 (2025), arXiv:2408.05417 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    M. M. Gohain, P. Phukon, and K. Bhuyan, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101683 (2024), arXiv:2407.02872 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Uktamov, S

    U. Uktamov, S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, and C. Yuan, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1432 (2025), arXiv:2505.20031 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Al-Badawi and S

    A. Al-Badawi and S. Shaymatov, Chin. Phys. C49, 055101 (2025), arXiv:2501.15397 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Al-Badawi and S

    A. Al-Badawi and S. Shaymatov, Commun. Theor. Phys.77, 035402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Alloqulov, T

    M. Alloqulov, T. Xamidov, S. Shaymatov, and B. Ahmedov, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.05236 (2025), arXiv:2504.05236 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    S. Lu, A. Ilyas, X.-H. Ma, B. Wang, D. Zhang, and Y.-F. Cai, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025, 086 (2025), arXiv:2407.19521 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Xamidov, U

    T. Xamidov, U. Uktamov, S. Shaymatov, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Dark Universe47, 101805 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Xamidov, S

    T. Xamidov, S. Shaymatov, Q. Wu, and T. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1193 (2025), arXiv:2507.13147 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Abd El Dayem, Astron

    Gravity Collaboration and K. Abd El Dayem, Astron. Astrophys.692, A242 (2024), arXiv:2409.12261 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2105.07101 (2021), arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Jusufi, K

    K. Jusufi, K. Saurabh, M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, M. Jamil, Q. Wu, and C. Bambi, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2106.08070 (2021), arXiv:2106.08070 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Nampalliwar, S

    S. Nampalliwar, S. Kumar, K. Jusufi, Q. Wu, M. Jamil, and P. Salucci, Astrophys. J.916, 116 (2021), arXiv:2103.12439 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    J.-M. Yan, Q. Wu, C. Liu, T. Zhu, and A. Wang, JCAP2022, 008 (2022), arXiv:2203.03203 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    J.-M. Yan, C. Liu, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D107, 084043 (2023), arXiv:2302.10482 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Shaymatov, B

    S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, M. De Laurentis, M. Jamil, Q. Wu, A. Wang, and M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, Astrophys. J.959, 6 (2023), arXiv:2307.10804 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Dynamical constraints on a dark matter spike at the Galactic Centre from stellar orbits

    T. Lacroix, Astron. Astrophys.619, A46 (2018), arXiv:1801.01308 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    A. A. Nucita, F. De Paolis, G. Ingrosso, A. Qadir, and A. F. Zakharov, PASP119, 349 (2007), arXiv:0705.0494 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  65. [65]

    A. M. Ghez, S. Salim, S. D. Hornstein, A. Tanner, J. R. Lu, M. Morris, E. E. Becklin, and G. Duchˆ ene, Astrophys. J. 620, 744 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0306130 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    A. M. Ghez, M. Morris, E. E. Becklin, A. Tanner, and T. Kremenek, Nature407, 349 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0009339 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  67. [67]

    Astrophys.636, L5 (2020), arXiv:2004.07187 [astro-ph.GA]

    GRAVITY Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys.636, L5 (2020), arXiv:2004.07187 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    H. Mo, F. C. van den Bosch, and S. White,Galaxy Formation and Evolution(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Observational signatures of exact black hole solutions in a dark matter halo,

    A. Boltaev, T. Xamidov, and S. Shaymatov, “Observational signatures of exact black hole solutions in a dark matter halo,” (2026), arXiv:2603.17986 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973)

    work page 1973

  71. [71]

    G. S. Adkins and J. McDonnell, Phys. Rev. D75, 082001 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702015 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  72. [72]

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013), arXiv:1202.3665 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [73]

    Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole

    GRAVITY Collaboration, Astron. Astrophys.615, L15 (2018), arXiv:1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    M. J. Reid, K. M. Menten, S. Trippe, T. Ott, and R. Genzel, Astrophys. J.659, 378 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612164 12 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007