pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28804 · v1 · pith:PTAROMUBnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Whispers of Supergravity in Gravitational Wave Backgrounds: Determining the Gravitino Mass from Cosmic Thermal History

Angus Spalding , Stephen F. King This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords gravitinostochastic gravitational wavesearly matter dominationsupergravityprimordial gravitational wave backgroundBBNNANOGrav
0
0 comments X

The pith

Features in the stochastic gravitational wave background directly determine the gravitino mass and its initial abundance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Gravitinos heavier than the electroweak scale decay before Big Bang Nucleosynthesis yet produce a temporary era of matter domination in the early universe. This era imprints two distinct frequencies on any primordial gravitational wave spectrum, one at the start and one at the end of the phase. The paper shows these frequencies map directly onto the gravitino mass and its starting abundance. Future detectors covering a wide frequency range can therefore reach masses from the BBN lower bound of order 100 TeV up to 10^10 TeV. The recent NANOGrav signal already constrains the mass window 500 to 10^4 TeV.

Core claim

Gravitinos above the electroweak scale decay before BBN but induce an early matter-dominated era whose onset and termination frequencies in the stochastic gravitational wave background provide a direct determination of both the gravitino mass and its initial abundance.

What carries the argument

The pair of frequencies in the gravitational wave spectrum that mark the beginning and end of the early matter-dominated era caused by gravitino decay.

If this is right

  • Gravitational wave observatories can access gravitino masses from O(100) TeV to O(10^10) TeV.
  • The NANOGrav signal already probes gravitino masses between 500 and 10^4 TeV.
  • Both the mass and the initial abundance are recoverable from the same two frequency features.
  • Gravitational wave data thereby test supergravity in a regime unreachable by colliders.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same frequency-mapping technique could apply to any long-lived particle that triggers a comparable early matter-dominated phase.
  • Detection of the predicted features would independently confirm an early matter era whose timing is set by a single particle species.
  • Precision of the mass extraction may be limited by uncertainties in the initial gravitational wave spectrum shape.

Load-bearing premise

The early matter-dominated era produced by gravitino decay imprints two cleanly identifiable frequency features that map uniquely to the gravitino mass and abundance without significant contamination from other processes.

What would settle it

A measured stochastic gravitational wave spectrum that lacks any pair of frequency breaks consistent with a single gravitino mass, or that shows breaks incompatible with the predicted mapping for any mass in the 100 TeV to 10^10 TeV range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28804 by Angus Spalding, Stephen F. King.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitino masses above the electroweak scale provide the simplest solution to the gravitino problem, but such large mass scales lie far beyond the reach of collider experiments. We show that the stochastic gravitational wave background offers a direct probe of this otherwise inaccessible regime. Despite decaying before Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), these gravitinos naturally generate a period of early matter domination in the early universe. This non-standard epoch leaves a characteristic imprint on any primordial gravitational wave background, characterised by two frequencies corresponding to the onset and end of this phase. We demonstrate that these features can be used to directly infer both the gravitino mass and its initial abundance in a direct mapping. Future gravitational wave observatories span a vast frequency range, enabling sensitivity to gravitino masses from the BBN bound of $\mathcal{O}(100)\,\text{TeV}$ all the way up to $\mathcal{O}(10^{10})\,\text{TeV}$, with recent signal by NANOGrav already probing masses in the range $500$-$10^4$ TeV. Gravitational wave observables therefore probe an enormous region of parameter space, far beyond the reach of collider experiments. We are entering an era in which supergravity can be probed through gravitational wave backgrounds alongside collider experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that gravitinos with masses above the electroweak scale decay before BBN and induce an early matter-dominated era whose onset and end imprint two characteristic frequencies on any primordial GW background; these frequencies permit a direct mapping to both the gravitino mass m_{3/2} and its initial abundance, thereby probing masses from the BBN bound O(100) TeV up to O(10^{10}) TeV, with NANOGrav already sensitive to 500–10^4 TeV.

Significance. If the asserted one-to-one frequency-to-parameter mapping is robust and independent of other early-universe dynamics, the result would open a new observational window on supergravity at mass scales far beyond colliders, directly linking stochastic GW backgrounds to pre-BBN thermal history.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the two MD-era frequency breaks 'can be used to directly infer both the gravitino mass and its initial abundance in a direct mapping' is asserted without any visible derivation, explicit equations, error propagation, or demonstration that the mapping is independent of the initial abundance (itself listed as a free parameter). This mapping is load-bearing for all quantitative sensitivity statements.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no quantitative test is supplied showing that the pair of frequency breaks remains unique once realistic uncertainties in the primordial tensor spectrum or additional early-universe features (different decaying relics, kination phases, or g_* jumps at the QCD transition) are included; without such a demonstration the claimed one-to-one correspondence does not hold.
minor comments (1)
  1. The NANOGrav mass range 500–10^4 TeV is stated without reference to the specific signal or data release used to derive it.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report and the opportunity to clarify the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the two MD-era frequency breaks 'can be used to directly infer both the gravitino mass and its initial abundance in a direct mapping' is asserted without any visible derivation, explicit equations, error propagation, or demonstration that the mapping is independent of the initial abundance (itself listed as a free parameter). This mapping is load-bearing for all quantitative sensitivity statements.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the result; the explicit derivation appears in Sections 3 and 4. There we obtain two independent relations: the onset frequency depends on the temperature at which ρ_{3/2} = ρ_rad (a function of both m_{3/2} and the initial yield Y_{3/2}), while the end frequency is fixed solely by the gravitino lifetime au ≈ m_{3/2}^{-3} (or the appropriate power). Solving the two-frequency system therefore yields both parameters simultaneously. The mapping is not claimed to be independent of Y_{3/2}; rather, the pair of observables determines both quantities. We will revise the abstract to include a parenthetical reference to these equations and will add a short paragraph on error propagation in the revised text. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no quantitative test is supplied showing that the pair of frequency breaks remains unique once realistic uncertainties in the primordial tensor spectrum or additional early-universe features (different decaying relics, kination phases, or g_* jumps at the QCD transition) are included; without such a demonstration the claimed one-to-one correspondence does not hold.

    Authors: We agree that a systematic study of degeneracies would strengthen the result. The manuscript demonstrates that an early matter-dominated era produces a characteristic pair of breaks whose frequency ratio is fixed by the lifetime scaling. Other mechanisms (kination, additional relics, g_* jumps) generally produce different spectral features or require fine-tuned parameters to mimic both breaks at once. Nevertheless, we will add a new subsection in the revised version that qualitatively discusses these potential degeneracies and explains why the specific two-break pattern tied to a decaying relic with m_{3/2} > 100 TeV is distinctive. A full Monte-Carlo scan over all possible early-universe extensions lies beyond the present scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard cosmological mapping from MD-era timing to GW breaks

full rationale

The paper calculates the two characteristic frequencies from the onset and end of the gravitino-induced early matter-dominated era using the standard Friedmann equation, decay lifetime au o m_{3/2}, and the condition that the era ends before BBN. These frequencies are then inverted to solve for m_{3/2} and the initial abundance Y_{3/2}. This is a direct, parameter-to-observable relation derived from the thermal history; the mapping is not obtained by fitting to the target GW data nor by self-citation of a uniqueness theorem. No equations reduce the claimed prediction to a tautology or to a fitted input renamed as output. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks of early-universe cosmology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about gravitino decay timing and the effect of early matter domination on GW spectra; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • initial gravitino abundance
    The paper states this quantity can be inferred alongside the mass, implying it functions as a free parameter in the underlying model.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gravitinos with masses above the electroweak scale decay before BBN and produce a period of early matter domination.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the mechanism generating the GW imprint.
  • domain assumption The onset and end of early matter domination produce two identifiable frequency features in the primordial GW background.
    Core premise required for the direct mapping to mass and abundance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5763 in / 1550 out tokens · 29883 ms · 2026-06-29T10:17:24.880670+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman, JETP Lett.13, 323 (1971)

    1971

  2. [2]

    D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov, Phys. Lett. B46, 109 (1973)

    1973

  3. [3]

    Salam and J

    A. Salam and J. A. Strathdee, Nucl. Phys. B76, 477 (1974)

    1974

  4. [4]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B70, 39 (1974)

    1974

  5. [5]

    Ferrara and P

    S. Ferrara and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 1669 (1976)

    1976

  6. [6]

    Deser and B

    S. Deser and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B62, 335 (1976)

    1976

  7. [7]

    Dimopoulos and H

    S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B193, 150 (1981)

    1981

  8. [8]

    H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, Phys. Rept.117, 75 (1985)

    1985

  9. [9]

    H. P. Nilles, Phys. Rept.110, 1 (1984)

    1984

  10. [10]

    S. P. Martin, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18, 1 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9709356

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. B149, 117 (1984)

    1984

  12. [12]

    J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Rept.89, 223 (1982)

    1982

  13. [13]

    Candelas, G

    P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B258, 46 (1985)

    1985

  14. [14]

    Dirichlet-Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges

    J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4724 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9510017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  15. [15]

    String Theory Dynamics In Various Dimensions

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B443, 85 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9503124

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  16. [16]

    Alvarez-Gaume and E

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B234, 269 (1984)

    1984

  17. [17]

    J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B 238, 453 (1984)

    1984

  18. [18]

    A. H. Chamseddine, R. L. Arnowitt, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 970 (1982)

    1982

  19. [19]

    Barbieri, S

    R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara, and C. A. Savoy, Phys. Lett. B119, 343 (1982). 19

    1982

  20. [20]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1303 (1982)

    1982

  21. [21]

    Moroi,Effects of the gravitino on the inflationary universe, Other thesis (1995), arXiv:hep- ph/9503210

    T. Moroi,Effects of the gravitino on the inflationary universe, Other thesis (1995), arXiv:hep- ph/9503210

    work page arXiv 1995

  22. [22]

    Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis and Gravitino

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi, and A. Yotsuyanagi, Phys. Rev. D78, 065011 (2008), arXiv:0804.3745 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    M. Bolz, A. Brandenburg, and W. Buchmuller, Nucl. Phys. B606, 518 (2001), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 790, 336–337 (2008)], arXiv:hep-ph/0012052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  24. [24]

    Irreducible Gravitational Wave Background as a Particle Detector

    A. Ghoshal, A. Spalding, and G. White, (2026), arXiv:2604.20792 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Datta, A

    S. Datta, A. Ghoshal, A. Spalding, and G. White, JHEP03, 245 (2026), arXiv:2511.01779 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Imprint of domain wall annihilation on induced gravitational waves

    R. Roshan, (2026), arXiv:2604.25726 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Pearce, L

    M. Pearce, L. Pearce, G. White, and C. Bal´ azs, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024, 021 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Barenboim and W.-I

    G. Barenboim and W.-I. Park, Physics Letters B759, 430 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    Assadullahi and D

    H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, Physical Review D79(2009), 10.1103/physrevd.79.083511

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.083511 2009

  30. [30]

    Alabidi, K

    L. Alabidi, K. Kohri, M. Sasaki, and Y. Sendouda, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2013, 033–033 (2013)

    2013

  31. [31]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Physical Review D97(2018), 10.1103/physrevd.97.123532

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.123532 2018

  32. [32]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, Physical Review D100(2019), 10.1103/physrevd.100.043532

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043532 2019

  33. [33]

    Ferreira, E

    O. Ferreira, E. S. Fraga, M. Hippert, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Phys. Rev. D112, 094009 (2025), arXiv:2507.06518 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Ferreira, E

    O. Ferreira, E. S. Fraga, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, (2026), arXiv:2603.26946 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Caprini and D

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 163001 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Bin´ etruy, A

    P. Bin´ etruy, A. Boh´ e, C. Caprini, and J.-F. Dufaux, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012, 027–027 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    Roshan and G

    R. Roshan and G. White, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 015001 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    van Remortel, K

    N. van Remortel, K. Janssens, and K. Turbang, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 128, 104003 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Christensen, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 016903 (2018)

    N. Christensen, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 016903 (2018). 20

    2018

  40. [40]

    Caprini, M

    C. Caprini, M. Hindmarsh, S. Huber, T. Konstandin, J. Kozaczuk, G. Nardini, J. M. No, A. Petiteau, P. Schwaller, G. Servant, and D. J. Weir, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016, 001–001 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    R. R. Caldwell, T. L. Smith, and D. G. E. Walker, Phys. Rev. D100, 043513 (2019), arXiv:1812.07577 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    L. A. Boyle and P. J. Steinhardt, Physical Review D77(2008), 10.1103/physrevd.77.063504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.063504 2008

  43. [43]

    L. A. Boyle and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D77, 063504 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0512014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    Barman, A

    B. Barman, A. Ghoshal, B. Grzadkowski, and A. Socha, JHEP07, 231 (2023), arXiv:2305.00027 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Phys. Rev. D92, 123009 (2015), arXiv:1504.03291 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Crawford and D

    G. Crawford and D. Sutherland, JHEP04, 197 (2025), arXiv:2409.18177 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Vilenkin, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D23, 852 (1981)

    1981

  48. [48]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D31, 3052 (1985)

    1985

  49. [49]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Physical Review D96(2017), 10.1103/phys- revd.96.104046

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2017

  50. [50]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010, 032–032 (2010)

    2010

  51. [51]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects(Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    2000

  52. [52]

    Cosmic Strings Gravitational Wave Probe of Leptogenesis: Thermal, Non-thermal, Near-resonant and Flavourful

    A. Ghoshal, A. Spalding, and G. White, (2025), arXiv:2512.14684 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    R. A. Battye, L. P. Bunio, S. J. Cotterill, and P. B. G. Manoj, (2026), arXiv:2601.19463 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A9, 1387 (1976)

    1976

  55. [55]

    M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Rept. Prog. Phys.58, 477 (1995), arXiv:hep- ph/9411342

    work page arXiv 1995

  56. [56]

    T. Kite, A. Ravenni, S. P. Patil, and J. Chluba, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505, 4396 (2021), arXiv:2010.00040 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241103 (2016), arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 221101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129901 (2018)], arXiv:1706.01812 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    B. . P. . Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.851, L35 (2017), arXiv:1711.05578 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 141101 (2017), arXiv:1709.09660 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Badurina, O

    L. Badurina, O. Buchmueller, J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, C. McCabe, and V. Vaskonen, Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.380, 20210060 (2021), arXiv:2108.02468 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D94, 104022 (2016), arXiv:1606.01860 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, S. Rajendran, and R. W. Romani (MAGIS), (2017), arXiv:1711.02225 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Badurinaet al., JCAP05, 011 (2020), arXiv:1911.11755 [astro-ph.CO]

    L. Badurinaet al., JCAP05, 011 (2020), arXiv:1911.11755 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Punturoet al., Class

    M. Punturoet al., Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  68. [68]

    Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories

    S. Hildet al., Class. Quant. Grav.28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.34, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitzeet al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky

    J. Bakeret al., (2019), arXiv:1907.06482 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Y. A. El-Neajet al.(AEDGE), EPJ Quant. Technol.7, 6 (2020), arXiv:1908.00802 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Unveiling the Gravitational Universe at \mu-Hz Frequencies

    A. Sesanaet al., Exper. Astron.51, 1333 (2021), arXiv:1908.11391 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [74]

    Garcia-Bellido, H

    J. Garcia-Bellido, H. Murayama, and G. White, JCAP12, 023 (2021), arXiv:2104.04778 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    C. L. Carilli and S. Rawlings, New Astron. Rev.48, 979 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0409274

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  76. [76]

    Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA

    G. Janssenet al., PoSAASKA14, 037 (2015), arXiv:1501.00127 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    Weltmanet al., Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array, Publ

    A. Weltmanet al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37, e002 (2020), arXiv:1810.02680 [astro- ph.CO]. 22

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background

    L. Lentatiet al.(EPTA), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453, 2576 (2015), arXiv:1504.03692 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    European Pulsar Timing Array Limits on Continuous Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    S. Babaket al.(EPTA), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.455, 1665 (2016), arXiv:1509.02165 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background

    Z. Arzoumanianet al.(NANOGRAV), Astrophys. J.859, 47 (2018), arXiv:1801.02617 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.