pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03522 · v1 · pith:AZVZOASInew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

The UV Side of Little Red Dots: Red, Compact, and Iron-Enhanced Rest-UV Emission with a Strong Downturn around Lyα

Makoto Ando , Yuichi Harikane , Harley Katz , Kohei Inayoshi , Takumi S. Tanaka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 09:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Little Red DotsJWSTUV continuumsupermassive black holesnebular continuumBalmer breakFe II emissionhigh-redshift galaxies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Little Red Dots require an additional central red UV continuum source beyond host galaxy emission alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the rest-UV emission of roughly 100 Little Red Dots selected from JWST spectra. It shows that LRDs have redder UV slopes and more compact UV morphologies than star-forming galaxies at matching redshifts and magnitudes. Stacked spectra reveal positive correlations among Balmer break strength, UV slope, Fe II equivalent width, and the depth of the downturn near Lyα, with UV size anticorrelated to the Balmer break. Spectral modeling demonstrates that host galaxy starlight cannot reproduce the observed red UV continuum, requiring an extra component with slope β_UV around 0. This central source may be nebular continuum leaking from dense ionized gas through a clumpy neutral envelope, and the data also show elevated Fe II to Mg II ratios of 8-10.

Core claim

LRDs exhibit systematically redder UV slopes, smaller UV sizes, and stronger Fe II emission relative to Mg II compared with star-forming galaxies. These UV traits correlate with optical features such as Balmer break strength, indicating that the UV light includes a substantial contribution from a central red compact emitter. Modeling requires this extra component to have β_UV ∼ 0 and suggests it arises as nebular continuum radiation that escapes through a porous neutral gas envelope surrounding the central region.

What carries the argument

The additional very red continuum source with β_UV ∼ 0, required by spectral modeling to explain the observed UV properties beyond host galaxy emission.

If this is right

  • Diversity in UV continuum shape traces the varying dominance of central emission over host galaxy light.
  • UV size shrinks as the central component grows stronger relative to the host, producing the observed anticorrelation with Balmer break strength.
  • Fe II/Mg II ratios of 8-10 exceed those in typical quasars at similar redshifts.
  • The strength of the Lyα downturn, UV slope, and Fe II lines all increase together with the Balmer break in stacked spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the clumpy-envelope leakage picture holds, the same geometry could link the UV downturn to the V-shaped optical spectra already noted in LRDs.
  • Higher-resolution UV imaging could test whether the red compact component is spatially offset from the host or co-located with the broad-line region.
  • The elevated iron lines may indicate chemical enrichment patterns tied to rapid early black-hole growth rather than standard stellar populations.

Load-bearing premise

Spectral models can accurately decompose observed UV light into host galaxy starlight versus a distinct central component without bias introduced by the LRD selection criteria.

What would settle it

A set of LRDs whose UV slopes and sizes match those of ordinary star-forming galaxies after refined decomposition or higher-resolution data would falsify the requirement for an extra central red source.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03522 by Harley Katz, Kohei Inayoshi, Makoto Ando, Takumi S. Tanaka, Yuichi Harikane.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the LRD sample used in this paper. The LRDs are basically selected in terms of the V-shape spectra and compact morphology in the F444W images by A. de Graaff et al. (2025b). Left panel: optical luminosities at 5100 ˚A against redshifts color-coded by magnification factors. The second y-axis shows the corresponding bolometric luminosities converted with the bolometric correction of Lbol/L5100 = … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Relation between UV slope βUV and the UV magnitude at 1500 ˚A for six redshift bins. The red dots are individual LRDs, and the red open squares are their medians in given magnitude bins. The medians are shown only when more than one data point falls into a magnitude bin. For comparison to normal star-forming galaxies (SFGs), we also show the median βUV-MUV relations for Lyman break galaxies selected by R. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relative values of the UV slopes of the LRDs against those calculated from the MUV-βUV relation of nor￾mal SFGs, ∆βUV = βUV, LRD −βUV, base, color-coded by red￾shift. The histograms of MUV and ∆βUV are shown in the top and right subplots, respectively. The black dotted and red dashed horizontal lines indicate zero and median ∆βUV values, respectively. A positive (negative) ∆βUV means that a given LRD has r… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relation between effective radii reff and the UV magnitude at 1500 ˚A for six redshift bins. The red-filled (open) dots are individual LRDs with SN > 10 (SN < 10) in the UV images, and the downward triangles indicate 1σ upper limits for unresolved sources. Red open squares are median sizes computed in log-space for the SN > 10 subsamples in given magnitude bins. We conservatively use 1σ upper limits for un… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stacked spectrum of all LRDs at z > 3.5 (N=93). The top panel shows the entire spectral range from UV to optical, while the bottom panel focuses on the UV range. We adopt the median stacking after normalizing individual spectra at 3000 ˚A. Uncertainties of the stacked spectrum estimated by bootstrap are shown by gray shades. Representative emission lines are shown by black dashed lines. The gray background… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Correlations among the Balmer break strength, UV slope (βUV), depth of downturn around Lyα (DLyα), and median UV size. The red squares and cyan circles repre￾sent the stacked spectra based on Balmer-break-strength and UV-slope subsamples, respectively. Clear correlations exist among these quantities: LRDs with stronger Balmer breaks have redder UV slopes, deeper downturns, and smaller sizes. measured Fe ii… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Zoom-in view of the LRD spectra around the UV Fe ii complex. Stacked Spectra for the blue, all, and red subsamples are shown from top to bottom. Additionally, the spectrum of A2744-45924 is also displayed. Spectra are normalized to a continuum level. The wavelengths of the UV Fe ii complex, Mg iiλ2800, and He iiλ3203 are highlighted. Under the assumption that the UV emission of LRDs largely originates in … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left panel: measured Fe ii/Mg ii ratios for stacked spectra of LRDs. The circle, square, and diamond represent the stacked spectra for the blue, all, and red subsamples, respectively. Additionally, the flux ratio for A2744-45924 is also shown as the star. For stacked spectra, the median, 16th, and 84th redshift percentiles for each subsample are shown as the x-values. The orange dashed lines indicate the … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spectral modeling of the UV continuum of LRDs. We show the three models from left to right: (A) Dense ionized gas & host galaxy, (B) Dense ionized gas & AGN & host galaxy, and (C) Nebular-dominated host galaxy models. The top panels show a schematic illustration of each model. Below them, from top to bottom, stacked spectra for the blue (βUV < −1.5) subsample, the all sample, the red (βUV > −1.5) subsampl… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Schematic illustration of origins of the rest-frame UV (left side) and optical (right side) emission from LRD based on a clumpy/porous BH envelope model (models A and B in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Little Red Dots (LRDs) are candidates for growing supermassive black holes newly discovered by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), characterized by compact rest-optical morphology, V-shaped spectra, and broad Hydrogen Balmer lines. While recently proposed BH-star/envelope models have made progress in explaining their optical features, their rest-UV emission, which is considered to originate from host galaxies, remains poorly investigated. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of the UV emission, including continuum shapes, emission line strengths, and morphology, using $\sim100$ LRDs selected from the JWST spectral archive. Compared to star-forming galaxies at the same redshifts and UV magnitudes, LRDs show systematically redder UV slopes and more compact UV sizes, indicating that their UV emission cannot be explained solely by normal star-forming galaxies and requires a significant contribution from central red and compact emission. From stacked spectra, we find that the Balmer break strength, UV slope, downturn depth around Ly$\alpha$, and $\mathrm{Fe\, II}$ equivalent width are positively correlated, while the UV size is anticorrelated with the Balmer break strength, suggesting that diversity in the UV continuum shape reflects the varying dominance of the central emission relative to its host. We also measure $\mathrm{Fe\, II//Mg\, II}\sim8-10$, higher than in quasars at similar redshifts, further supporting a substantial contribution from the central component. Spectral modeling suggests that the observed red UV continuum cannot be reproduced by host galaxy emission alone, but requires an additional very red continuum source ($\beta_\mathrm{UV}\sim0$), possibly nebular continuum emission leaking from dense ionized gas through a clumpy or porous neutral gas envelope.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the rest-UV properties of ~100 Little Red Dots (LRDs) selected from the JWST spectral archive. It reports that LRDs exhibit systematically redder UV continuum slopes and more compact UV morphologies than star-forming galaxies at comparable redshifts and UV magnitudes. Stacked spectra reveal positive correlations among Balmer break strength, UV slope, Lyα downturn depth, and Fe II equivalent width, with UV size anticorrelated with Balmer break strength. The paper measures Fe II/Mg II ~8-10 (higher than typical quasars) and concludes from spectral modeling that the red UV continuum cannot be reproduced by host-galaxy emission alone, requiring an additional central component with β_UV~0, possibly nebular continuum leaking through a clumpy neutral envelope.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides empirical evidence that LRD UV emission includes a significant central contribution distinct from normal star-forming hosts, strengthening the case for AGN-related or nebular processes in these objects and offering testable correlations between UV shape and optical features. The stacked-spectra correlations and Fe II/Mg II measurement constitute falsifiable, observationally grounded results that could guide future modeling of LRDs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and modeling section: the claim that host-galaxy emission alone cannot reproduce the observed red UV continuum (β_UV~0) is load-bearing for the central conclusion, yet the text provides no details on the SPS code, attenuation law, SFH parameterization, dust geometry grid, or metallicity range explored. Without an exhaustive search or demonstration that plausible host combinations are ruled out while preserving the observed Balmer break and line ratios, the requirement for an additional central component is not uniquely established.
  2. [Abstract] Sample selection and stacking procedures (implied in abstract): the ~100 LRDs are selected on compact optical morphology, V-shaped spectra, and broad Balmer lines; these criteria may correlate with dust or age properties that bias the measured UV slopes and sizes. The manuscript does not report the parent catalog, completeness, or how stacking weights and error propagation are handled, which directly affects the reported correlations and the comparison to star-forming galaxies at matched z and M_UV.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: β_UV is used for the central component without an explicit definition or reference to the wavelength range over which it is measured.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight areas where additional methodological detail will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and modeling section: the claim that host-galaxy emission alone cannot reproduce the observed red UV continuum (β_UV~0) is load-bearing for the central conclusion, yet the text provides no details on the SPS code, attenuation law, SFH parameterization, dust geometry grid, or metallicity range explored. Without an exhaustive search or demonstration that plausible host combinations are ruled out while preserving the observed Balmer break and line ratios, the requirement for an additional central component is not uniquely established.

    Authors: We agree that the modeling details require expansion to fully support the claim. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated methods subsection specifying the SPS code (Bruzual & Charlot 2003), attenuation law (Calzetti), SFH parameterizations (constant and exponentially declining), dust geometry grid, and metallicity range (0.2–1 Z⊙). A comprehensive grid search was performed over these parameters while enforcing consistency with the observed Balmer break and line ratios; the results demonstrate that no plausible host combination reproduces β_UV ≈ 0. Updated figures will illustrate the model grids and residuals. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Sample selection and stacking procedures (implied in abstract): the ~100 LRDs are selected on compact optical morphology, V-shaped spectra, and broad Balmer lines; these criteria may correlate with dust or age properties that bias the measured UV slopes and sizes. The manuscript does not report the parent catalog, completeness, or how stacking weights and error propagation are handled, which directly affects the reported correlations and the comparison to star-forming galaxies at matched z and M_UV.

    Authors: Section 2 describes the selection from the JWST spectral archive. The revised version will explicitly name the parent programs (e.g., CEERS, JADES), report completeness as a function of magnitude and redshift, and detail the stacking procedure (inverse-variance weighting with bootstrap resampling for errors). While selection criteria may correlate with certain properties, comparisons use star-forming galaxies matched in z and M_UV, and internal correlations within the LRD sample remain robust. A new paragraph will discuss potential selection effects. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; analysis grounded in external comparisons

full rationale

The paper presents observational results from JWST spectra of LRDs, including direct comparisons to star-forming galaxies at matching redshifts and magnitudes, stacked spectral correlations (Balmer break vs. UV slope, Fe II EW, UV size), Fe II/Mg II ratios, and spectral modeling conclusions. No equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. Claims rest on external sample benchmarks and model comparisons without reduction to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim depends on the assumption that LRDs are a distinct population whose UV properties require a central component, plus modeling choices for nebular emission and envelope geometry.

free parameters (1)
  • β_UV for central component
    Value ~0 chosen or fitted to reproduce the red UV continuum in modeling.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption LRD selection based on compact rest-optical morphology, V-shaped spectra, and broad Balmer lines defines a clean sample for UV analysis
    Used to select the ~100 objects from the JWST archive.
invented entities (1)
  • clumpy or porous neutral gas envelope no independent evidence
    purpose: Allows nebular continuum to leak and produce the observed red UV emission
    Proposed as possible physical explanation in the spectral modeling section of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5879 in / 1402 out tokens · 24407 ms · 2026-06-28T09:23:17.602385+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Black Hole Stars Across the Universe: Identifying Central Engine Dominated Little Red Dots at $z\sim1.5-9.5$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    New template-fitting selection yields 241 BH*-dominated LRD candidates at z~1.7-9.3 with number density peaking at z~5-6, demonstrating persistence to lower redshifts.

  2. Through the Veil: Ly$\alpha$ Illuminates the Host Galaxies of Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Lyα observations of Little Red Dots show luminosities and equivalent widths like normal star-forming galaxies but lower Lyα/Hα ratios and extended asymmetric emission, supporting a two-component model with host-scale gas.

  3. Little Red Dots as Supermassive Analogs of SS 433

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LRDs are interpreted as high-inclination hyper-Eddington accreting SMBHs analogous to SS 433, with V-shaped SEDs, X-ray weakness, and Balmer breaks emerging from disk self-shielding geometry.

  4. TBD LBD: The nature of `little blue dots'

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LBDs are interpreted as lower-column analogues of LRDs in a gas-cocooned AGN sequence, with predicted spectral features including Balmer jumps and X-ray weakness.

  5. JADES: the mass-metallicity relation at $z=1-10$. New calibrations, extremely metal-poor galaxies, and chemical diversity

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New stack-based strong-line calibrations from ~1500 spectra yield mass-metallicity relations at z=1-10 with decreasing metallicity toward higher redshift and no slope change, plus 50 EMPG candidates at 1-4% solar meta...

  6. A Scaling Relation of LRDs between Broad H$\alpha$ and Bolometric Luminosities: Enhanced Broad H$\alpha$ Emission Relative to Low-$z$ Type 1 AGN

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LRDs at z~3-7 exhibit an L_Hα,broad-L_bol scaling relation enhanced by a factor of ~40 compared to low-z Type 1 AGN, explained via Cloudy modeling with near-unity covering factor and high column density.

  7. Constraints on the Gas Geometry Surrounding Little Red Dots through Narrow-Line Diagnostics

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Narrow-line diagnostics on ~20 LRDs indicate that stellar photoionization alone cannot explain the observed ratios in many objects, implying anisotropic ionizing radiation from complex gas geometry.

  8. Little Red and Blue Dots: AGN-excited narrow lines, Lyman-$\alpha$ emission, and resemblance to standard quasars

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    JWST data on LRDs and LBDs show AGN-like excitation, strong Lyα with broad components, and X-ray weakness, implying clumpy or equatorial geometries around growing black holes rather than complete gas envelopes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  2. [2]

    T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  3. [3]

    Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

    Asada, Y., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10573 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/153...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10573 2026

  4. [4]

    Baggen, J. F. W., Scoggins, M. T., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02702, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02702

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.02702 2026

  5. [5]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/83

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/754/2/83 2012

  6. [6]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 793, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/115

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/2/115 2014

  7. [7]

    2023a, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    Brammer, G. 2023a, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596

  8. [8]

    2023b, grizli, 1.9.11 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    Brammer, G. 2023b, grizli, 1.9.11 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018

  9. [9]

    2025, The DAWN JWST Archive: Compilation of Public NIRSpec Spectra, 4.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15472354

    Brammer, G., & Valentino, F. 2025, The DAWN JWST Archive: Compilation of Public NIRSpec Spectra, 4.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15472354

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15472354 2025

  10. [10]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1503, doi: 10.1086/591786

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/591786 2008

  11. [11]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  12. [12]

    J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 523, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1547

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1547 2024

  13. [13]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L61, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfa91

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfa91 2025

  14. [14]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2131 2026

  15. [15]

    2023, RMxAA, 59, 327, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12

    Chatzikos, M., Bianchi, S., Camilloni, F., et al. 2023, RMxAA, 59, 327, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12

    work page doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12 2023

  16. [16]

    C., Li, R., & Inayoshi, K

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R., & Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJL, 989, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adee0a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adee0a 2025

  17. [17]

    P., Whitaker, K

    Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.24700, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.24700 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, A&A, 701, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554681 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.21820 de...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24700 2026

  18. [18]

    Ding, X., Birrer, S., Treu, T., & Silverman, J. D. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2111.08721, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.08721

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.08721 2021

  19. [19]

    C., et al

    Dong, X.-B., Wang, J.-G., Ho, L. C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/86

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/86 2011

  20. [20]

    K., Quider, A

    Erb, D. K., Quider, A. M., Henry, A. L., & Martin, C. L. 2012, ApJ, 759, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/26

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/1/26 2012

  21. [21]

    J., Secunda, A

    Furtak, L. J., Secunda, A. R., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A227, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554110

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554110 2025

  22. [22]

    VENUS: When Red meets Blue -- A multiply imaged Little Red Dot with an apparent blue companion behind the galaxy cluster Abell 383

    Golubchik, M., Furtak, L. J., Allingham, J. F. V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.02117, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.02117 Gonz´ alez, V., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02117 2025

  23. [23]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  24. [24]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1836 The origins of the UV emission of LRDs21

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1836 2026

  25. [25]

    N., Maiolino, R., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al

    Hainline, K. N., Maiolino, R., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9920

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9920 2025

  26. [26]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e 2023

  27. [27]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450243

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450243 2025

  28. [28]

    The pair-instability origin of supernova 2023vbw

    Hiramatsu, D., Berger, E., Tsuna, D., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.16487, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.16487 Ili´ c, D., Raki´ c, N., & Popovi´ c, L.ˇC. 2023, ApJS, 267, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd783

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.16487 2026

  29. [29]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJL, 988, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adea66

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adea66 2025

  30. [30]

    S., & Noda, H

    Inayoshi, K., Kimura, S. S., & Noda, H. 2025, PASJ, 77, 811, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaf050

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf050 2025

  31. [31]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  32. [32]

    2026, ApJ, 1000, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce

    Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ce 2026

  33. [33]

    K., & Ho, L

    Inayoshi, K., Onoue, M., Sugahara, Y., Inoue, A. K., & Ho, L. C. 2022, ApJL, 931, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6f01

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6f01 2022

  34. [34]

    K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M

    Inoue, A. K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1805, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu936

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu936 2014

  35. [35]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  36. [36]

    2026a, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al. 2026a, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2235

  37. [37]

    Holes in the BH$^\star$? AGN signatures in the FUV spectrum of a black-hole dominated Little Red Dot at $z=7.04$

    Ji, X., Pezzulli, G., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.03370

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03370

  38. [38]

    2001, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, http://www.scipy.org/

    Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al. 2001, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python, http://www.scipy.org/

    2001

  39. [39]

    C., Bunker, A

    Jones, G. C., Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A238, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347099

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347099 2024

  40. [40]

    J., Saxena, A., et al

    Katz, H., Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 104, doi: 10.33232/001c.142570

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.142570 2025

  41. [41]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  42. [42]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 2023

  43. [43]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  44. [44]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265 2024

  45. [45]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e 2025

  46. [46]

    E., Matthee, J., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04557 2024

  47. [47]

    L., Garofali, K., et al

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R. L., Garofali, K., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-026-02813-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-026-02813-w 2026

  48. [48]

    A., de Koter, A., et al

    Langer, N., Norman, C. A., de Koter, A., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, L19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078482

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078482 2007

  49. [49]

    M., Gerasimov, R., & Burgasser, A

    Larkin, M. M., Gerasimov, R., & Burgasser, A. J. 2023, AJ, 165, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac9b43

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9b43 2023

  50. [50]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf 2026

  51. [51]

    How I Wonder What You Are -- JWST's Little Red Dots do not TWINKLE

    Liu, Z., Naidu, R. P., Secunda, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.13000, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.13000

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.13000 2026

  52. [52]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323152 2015

  53. [53]

    E., Volonteri, M., et al

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Volonteri, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.02662, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.02662

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.02662 2025

  54. [54]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4596

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4596 2026

  55. [55]

    2024, ApJL, 976, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90e1

    Madau, P., & Haardt, F. 2024, ApJL, 976, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90e1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90e1 2024

  56. [56]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf359 2025

  57. [57]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  58. [58]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17667 2026

  59. [59]

    E., Bautista, M., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., & Morisset, C

    Mendoza, C., M´ endez-Delgado, J. E., Bautista, M., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., & Morisset, C. 2023, Atoms, 11, 63, doi: 10.3390/atoms11040063

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms11040063 2023

  60. [60]

    R., Heckman, T

    Meurer, G. R., Heckman, T. M., & Calzetti, D. 1999, ApJ, 521, 64, doi: 10.1086/307523

    work page doi:10.1086/307523 1999

  61. [61]

    2020, Atoms, 8, 66, doi: 10.3390/atoms8040066

    Morisset, C., Luridiana, V., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., et al. 2020, Atoms, 8, 66, doi: 10.3390/atoms8040066

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms8040066 2020

  62. [62]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  63. [63]

    2018, A&A, 612, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731935

    Nakajima, K., Schaerer, D., Le F` evre, O., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731935

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731935 2018

  64. [64]

    Evidence of violation of Case B recombination in Little Red Dots

    Nikopoulos, G. P., Watson, D., Sneppen, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.06362, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.06362

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.06362 2025

  65. [65]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817 22Ando et al

    work page doi:10.1086/160817 1983

  66. [66]

    2020, ApJ, 898, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba193 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P

    Onoue, M., Ba˜ nados, E., Mazzucchelli, C., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba193 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.20247, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.20247

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba193 2020

  67. [67]

    H., et al

    Rinaldi, P., Bonaventura, N., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfa10

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfa10 2025

  68. [68]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4 2026

  69. [69]

    2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8

    Sacchi, A., & Bogd´ an,´A. 2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8 2025

  70. [70]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/203 S´ anchez Almeida, J., Elmegreen, B

    Sameshima, H., Yoshii, Y., & Kawara, K. 2017, ApJ, 834, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/203 S´ anchez Almeida, J., Elmegreen, B. G., Mu˜ noz-Tu˜ n´ on, C., & Elmegreen, D. M. 2014, A&A Rv, 22, 71, doi: 10.1007/s00159-014-0071-1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/203 2017

  71. [71]

    Hitting the slopes: A spectroscopic view of UV continuum slopes of galaxies reveals a reddening at z > 9.5

    Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.14532, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.14532 S´ ersic, J. L. 1963, Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina, 6, 41

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.14532 2024

  72. [72]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025a, ApJL, 991, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b 2041

  73. [73]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., de Graaff, A., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 995, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1500

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1500

  74. [74]

    Shen, Y., & Ho, L. C. 2014, Nature, 513, 210, doi: 10.1038/nature13712

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13712 2014

  75. [75]

    2015, ApJS, 219, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15

    Shibuya, T., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. 2015, ApJS, 219, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15 2015

  76. [76]

    H., et al

    Sneppen, A., Watson, D., Matthews, J. H., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18864, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18864

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18864

  77. [77]

    Paschen Jumps in Little Red Dots: Evidence for Nebular Continua

    Sneppen, A., Matthews, J. H., Watson, D., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.09399, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.09399

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.09399

  78. [78]

    Little Red Dot $-$ Host Galaxy $=$ Black Hole Star: A Gas-Enshrouded Heart at the Center of Every Little Red Dot

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20929, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.20929

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20929 2026

  79. [79]

    S., Akins, H

    Tanaka, T. S., Akins, H. B., Harikane, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f 2025

  80. [80]

    P., Plat, A., et al

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Plat, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 217, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57 2025

Showing first 80 references.