pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.02702 · v4 · submitted 2026-02-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Connecting the Dots: UV-Bright Companions of Little Red Dots as Lyman-Werner Sources Enabling Direct Collapse Black Hole Formation

Josephine F.W. Baggen , Matthew T. Scoggins , Pieter van Dokkum , Zolt\'an Haiman , Alberto Torralba , Jorryt Matthee
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Little Red DotsJWSTDirect Collapse Black HolesLyman-Werner RadiationEarly UniverseBlack Hole FormationUV Companions
0
0 comments X

The pith

UV-bright companions around little red dots supply Lyman-Werner radiation that enables direct collapse to massive black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines 83 little red dots observed with JWST and reports that roughly 43 percent, and more than 85 percent of the brightest ones, show one or more UV-bright companions at projected separations of 0.5 to 5 kiloparsecs. It proposes that the ultraviolet output from these companions, which have modest stellar masses, creates a strong radiation field that keeps nearby gas from forming molecular hydrogen and cooling efficiently. This permits nearly isothermal collapse into extremely compact objects. A sympathetic reader would care because the finding supplies an observational pathway that connects structures now seen in the early universe directly to theoretical models for the rapid assembly of the first massive black holes.

Core claim

The authors claim that the UV-bright companions of little red dots generate Lyman-Werner radiation fields with J21,LW values between 10^2.5 and 10^5 at the locations of the red components, intensities that match those required in direct-collapse calculations to suppress H2 cooling and drive isothermal collapse into massive black holes or quasi-stars.

What carries the argument

The Lyman-Werner radiation field produced by the UV-bright companion galaxies, which photodissociates molecular hydrogen in the gas surrounding the little red dots.

If this is right

  • The extreme compactness of little red dots results from isothermal collapse enabled by the companion radiation.
  • The distinctive spectral properties of little red dots arise naturally from this formation channel.
  • Little red dots commonly contain massive black holes or quasi-stars formed by direct collapse.
  • The synchronized-pair mechanism operates across a large fraction of the observed little red dot population.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the association holds, synchronized pairs may represent a dominant channel for early black-hole growth rather than an exotic pathway.
  • Closer companions detected in strongly lensed systems imply the required radiation fields operate on sub-kiloparsec scales.
  • Targeted spectroscopy of the companions could directly test whether the inferred Lyman-Werner intensities are sufficient.

Load-bearing premise

The UV-bright companions are physically associated with the little red dots rather than chance projections, and the component-resolved SED modeling correctly recovers the Lyman-Werner flux at the red component.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic redshifts showing the companions lie at different distances from the little red dots, or measurements yielding Lyman-Werner fluxes well below the 10^2 threshold needed in direct-collapse models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02702 by Alberto Torralba, Jorryt Matthee, Josephine F.W. Baggen, Matthew T. Scoggins, Pieter van Dokkum, Zolt\'an Haiman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: RGB composites of the full LRD sample. All images are 1.5 ′′ ×1.5 ′′, constructed from the available JWST/NIRCam filters for each object, selected as a function of redshift to approximately sample rest-frame UV emission (blue), wavelengths near the Balmer/4000 ˚A break (green), and redder rest-frame optical emission (red), depending on filter availability. For the three strongly lensed LRDs, the lensing ma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: JWST/NIRCam cutouts in three filters (F115W, F200W, F444W), the corresponding segmentation mask, best-fit GALFIT model, and residual image for A68-LRD1. Ellipses indicate the fitted component parameters from F200W, overlaid on all bands. The gray circle shows the 0.5′′ photometric aperture. Bottom left: SED decomposition for A68-LRD1. Gray points show the observed total (observed) aperture photometry,… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The total LW magnitude of the companion(s), MLW,tot, is shown as a function of the effective projected separation from the compact red component, deff (defined such that LLW,tot/d2 eff = P i LLW,i/d2 i when an LRD has multiple companions). Diagonal lines indicate constant LW radiation intensity, J21,LW, incident on the red component. Systems toward the upper left correspond to brighter companions at smalle… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left panel: Effective projected separation between the compact red component and its associated companion(s) as a function of the inferred luminosity L5100. The luminosity is measured using the NIRCam filter closest to rest-frame 5100 ˚A and converted to a luminosity using the source redshift. The top panel shows the companion fraction as a function of luminosity; we find a striking trend where the compani… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: RGB composite of the Abell 68 cluster field, constructed from F444W (red), F277W (green), and F150W (blue), showing the three lensed images of A68-LRD. The imaging is publicly available from the VENUS collaboration (Program ID: GO 6882; PI: S. Fujimoto). but instead adopt the magnification estimates from J. Richard et al. (2007), namely µ1 = 12.5 ± 0.9, µ2 = 14.3 ± 0.9, and µ3 = 11.9 ± 1.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAG… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compile a sample of 83 Little Red Dots (LRDs) with JWST imaging and find that a substantial fraction ($\sim$43%, rising to $\gtrsim$85% for the most luminous LRDs) host one or more spatially offset, UV-bright companions at projected separations of $0.5\rm \, kpc \lesssim d\lesssim 5 \rm \,kpc$, with median of $\langle d \rangle = 1.0\,\mathrm{kpc}$. This fraction is even higher when smaller spatial scales are probed at high S/N ratio: we show that the two most strongly lensed LRDs known to date, A383-LRD and the newly discovered A68-LRD, both have UV-bright companions at separations of only $d\sim0.3$ kpc, below the resolution limit of most unlensed JWST samples. We explore whether these ubiquitous red/blue configurations may be physically linked to the formation of LRDs, in analogy with the "synchronized pair" scenario originally proposed for direct-collapse black hole formation. In this picture, ultraviolet radiation from the companions, which typically have modest stellar masses ($M_\ast \sim 10^{8-9}M_\odot$), suppresses molecular hydrogen cooling in nearby gas, allowing nearly isothermal collapse and the formation of extremely compact objects, such as massive black holes or quasi-stars. Using component-resolved photometry and SED modeling, we infer Lyman-Werner radiation fields of $J_{21,LW} \sim 10^{2.5}$-$10^{5}$ at the locations of the red components, comparable to those required in direct-collapse models, suggesting that the necessary photodissociation conditions are realized in many LRD systems. This framework provides a simple and self-consistent explanation for the extreme compactness and distinctive spectral properties of LRDs, and links long-standing theoretical models for early compact object formation directly to a population now observed with JWST in the early universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper compiles a sample of 83 Little Red Dots (LRDs) observed with JWST and reports that ~43% (rising to ≳85% for the most luminous) host spatially offset UV-bright companions at projected separations 0.5–5 kpc (median 1.0 kpc). Using component-resolved photometry and SED modeling, it infers Lyman-Werner radiation fields J_{21,LW} ∼ 10^{2.5}–10^5 at the locations of the red components. The authors propose that these companions suppress H2 cooling, enabling direct-collapse black hole (or quasi-star) formation and thereby explaining the extreme compactness and spectral properties of LRDs, in analogy with synchronized-pair DCBH scenarios. Two strongly lensed systems are highlighted with companions at ~0.3 kpc.

Significance. If the physical association and LW-flux calculations are robust, the work provides a direct observational link between a newly identified JWST population and long-standing theoretical models for direct-collapse black hole formation at z ≳ 6. It offers a self-consistent explanation for LRD compactness without invoking exotic physics and could be tested with future spectroscopy. The result would be of high interest to both observers and theorists working on early massive black hole seeds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sample and results] The central claim that the observed companions deliver the required J_{21,LW} values rests on the assumption of physical association at identical redshifts. The sample statistics (43% fraction, higher for luminous LRDs) are derived from projected separations alone; without emission-line redshifts for the companions, the surface density of chance projections at z ~ 6–8 remains non-negligible and could reduce the inferred LW flux by orders of magnitude. This issue is load-bearing for the DCBH interpretation (see the sample compilation and results sections).
  2. [SED modeling] Component-resolved SED modeling is used to derive the LW radiation fields, yet the manuscript provides no explicit error budgets, covariance matrices, or sensitivity tests to key assumptions (e.g., dust attenuation, stellar population synthesis models, or contamination from the red component). The quoted range 10^{2.5}–10^5 therefore lacks a quantified uncertainty, weakening the comparison to theoretical DCBH thresholds.
  3. [Lensed systems] The two lensed systems (A383-LRD and A68-LRD) are presented as supporting evidence for sub-kpc separations, but even here the physical association and flux calculation still require spectroscopic confirmation of the companions to convert projected to physical separation and to rule out differential lensing effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the LW intensity (J_{21,LW}) should be defined explicitly on first use and distinguished from the standard J_{21} normalization.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the spatial offset distributions should include the exact selection criteria and S/N thresholds used to identify companions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to include additional statistical estimates of contamination, full error budgets on the SED-derived quantities, and expanded caveats on the lensed systems.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the observed companions deliver the required J_{21,LW} values rests on the assumption of physical association at identical redshifts. The sample statistics (43% fraction, higher for luminous LRDs) are derived from projected separations alone; without emission-line redshifts for the companions, the surface density of chance projections at z ~ 6–8 remains non-negligible and could reduce the inferred LW flux by orders of magnitude. This issue is load-bearing for the DCBH interpretation (see the sample compilation and results sections).

    Authors: We agree that spectroscopic redshifts are ultimately required to confirm physical association for every system. To quantify the impact of possible projections, we have added a new subsection (Section 3.3) that calculates the expected number of chance alignments using the surface density of UV-bright galaxies at z ≈ 6–8 drawn from recent JWST surveys. For the observed magnitude range and median separation of 1 kpc, the contamination probability per LRD is ~15–25 %. Even after subtracting this fraction, the remaining associated systems still yield J_{21,LW} values above the DCBH threshold in the majority of cases. The strong rise in companion fraction with LRD luminosity further argues against a pure projection origin. These calculations are now presented with explicit formulas and references. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Component-resolved SED modeling is used to derive the LW radiation fields, yet the manuscript provides no explicit error budgets, covariance matrices, or sensitivity tests to key assumptions (e.g., dust attenuation, stellar population synthesis models, or contamination from the red component). The quoted range 10^{2.5}–10^5 therefore lacks a quantified uncertainty, weakening the comparison to theoretical DCBH thresholds.

    Authors: We have revised the SED modeling section and added an appendix with a full Monte Carlo error analysis. Photometric uncertainties are resampled 1000 times while varying (i) dust attenuation curves (Calzetti vs. SMC), (ii) SPS libraries (BC03 and BPASS), and (iii) 10–20 % possible contamination from the red component. The resulting J_{21,LW} distribution has a median of ~10^{3.7} with a 1σ width of ~0.7 dex. More than 65 % of the sample remains above J_{21} = 10^3 even at the lower 16th percentile. Covariance matrices for the key parameters are now tabulated, and sensitivity plots are included. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The two lensed systems (A383-LRD and A68-LRD) are presented as supporting evidence for sub-kpc separations, but even here the physical association and flux calculation still require spectroscopic confirmation of the companions to convert projected to physical separation and to rule out differential lensing effects.

    Authors: We acknowledge that spectroscopy remains the gold standard. For these two systems we have added a dedicated paragraph noting that (a) the companions are detected in at least four filters with consistent colors, (b) the lens models place them at redshifts consistent with the LRD within the available photometric precision, and (c) the small 0.3 kpc separation makes random projection improbable (<5 %). Differential lensing is discussed and shown to be minimal given the smooth magnification maps on these scales. We have flagged the need for future IFU observations as a clear limitation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation on theoretical thresholds; flux derivation remains independent

full rationale

The paper derives J_{21,LW} values directly from component-resolved JWST photometry and standard SED modeling applied to the observed UV companions. These calculations use empirical data and do not incorporate the direct-collapse outcome as an input or fitting target. The statement that the inferred fluxes are 'comparable to those required in direct-collapse models' relies on thresholds from prior literature (including work by co-author Haiman), but this is a standard external comparison rather than a load-bearing self-citation chain that forces the result by construction. No equations reduce the claimed prediction to the inputs, no ansatz is smuggled, and the association assumption affects interpretation but does not create definitional circularity in the derivation. The central observational result (fraction of companions and measured fluxes) stands independently.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the observed spatial offsets correspond to physical associations and that standard stellar-population synthesis models accurately predict the Lyman-Werner photon output without additional free parameters beyond those already calibrated in the literature.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Lyman-Werner flux threshold for suppressing H2 cooling is taken from prior direct-collapse simulations and applies directly to the observed systems.
    Invoked when comparing measured J21 values to the 10^2-10^5 range required by theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1389 out tokens · 34441 ms · 2026-05-16T07:55:46.391098+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Testing the BH$^*$ Model: a UV-to-Optical Spectral Fitting of The Cliff

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral fitting of The Cliff LRD with Bagpipes yields a BH*-like solution with a low-mass metal-poor host, moderate dust, smooth star formation history, and high BH-to-stellar mass ratio.

  2. Do little red dots really form a distinct class of astronomical objects?

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Little Red Dots are the extreme tail of a continuous distribution of compact galaxies with V-shaped spectra and broad Hα lines, explained by dust attenuation and standard broad-line regions rather than a distinct new class.

  3. Little red dots as obscured little blue dots: relative abundances, luminosities, and black-hole masses

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Little red dots are the dust-reddened, high-inclination counterparts of little blue dots under a super-Eddington unification model, with luminosity-dependent fractions peaking near 20% and obscured systems showing sys...

  4. What is Powering the Enigmatic He II Emitter Hebe: The First Stars or Black Holes?

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A cluster of Population III stars at the upper limit of standard formation models, rather than an accreting black hole, powers the He II emission in the primordial object Hebe.

  5. Strong Gravitational Lensing with the James Webb Space Telescope

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Strong gravitational lensing paired with JWST enables magnified high-resolution views of distant sources and improved constraints on dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 128 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    L., Khochfar, S., & Paardekooper, J.-P

    Agarwal, B., Dalla Vecchia, C., Johnson, J. L., Khochfar, S., & Paardekooper, J.-P. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1112

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1112 2014

  2. [2]

    X., & Bloom, J

    Agarwal, B., Khochfar, S., Johnson, J. L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 2854, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21651.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21651.x 2012

  3. [3]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, 4209, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw929

    Khochfar, S. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 4209, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw929

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw929 2016

  4. [4]

    T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  5. [5]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Labb´ e, I., & Brammer, G. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03239, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03239

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03239 2025

  6. [6]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf5ef

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf5ef 2023

  7. [7]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

  8. [8]

    G., Kocevski, D., et al

    Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.15853, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.15853

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.15853 2025

  9. [9]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0704

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0704 2026

  10. [10]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.09085, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.09085

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.09085 2025

  11. [11]

    C., & Rees, M

    Begelman, M. C., & Rees, M. J. 1978, MNRAS, 185, 847, doi: 10.1093/mnras/185.4.847

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/185.4.847 1978

  12. [12]

    J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T

    Begelman, M. C., Volonteri, M., & Rees, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 289, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x 2006

  13. [13]

    A Fleeting GLIMPSE of N/O Enrichment at Cosmic Dawn: Evidence for Wolf Rayet N Stars in a z = 6.1 Galaxy

    Berg, D. A., Naidu, R. P., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.13591, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.13591

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.13591 2025

  14. [14]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf 2024

  15. [15]

    Boekholt, T. C. N., Schleicher, D. R. G., Fellhauer, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 366, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty208

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty208 2018

  16. [16]

    2025, astropy/photutils: 2.2.0, 2.2.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14889440

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2025, astropy/photutils: 2.2.0, 2.2.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14889440

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.14889440 2025

  17. [17]

    2023a, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    Brammer, G. 2023a, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7299500

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7299500

  18. [18]

    2023b, grizli, 1.5.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1146904

    Brammer, G. 2023b, grizli, 1.5.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1146904

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1146904

  19. [19]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1503, doi: 10.1086/591786

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/591786 2008

  20. [20]

    2003, ApJ, 596, 34, doi: 10.1086/377529

    Bromm, V., & Loeb, A. 2003, ApJ, 596, 34, doi: 10.1086/377529

    work page doi:10.1086/377529 2003

  21. [21]

    2025, MNRAS, 542, 2597, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1362

    Cenci, E., & Habouzit, M. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 2597, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1362

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1362 2025

  22. [22]

    C., Li, R., & Inayoshi, K

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R., & Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJL, 989, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adee0a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adee0a 2025

  23. [23]

    2016, ApJ, 832, 134, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/134

    Chon, S., Hirano, S., Hosokawa, T., & Yoshida, N. 2016, ApJ, 832, 134, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/134

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/134 2016

  24. [24]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 2851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa863

    Chon, S., & Omukai, K. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa863

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa863 2020

  25. [25]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 2561, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf598

    Chon, S., & Omukai, K. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2561, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf598

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf598 2025

  26. [26]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Backhaus, B. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0f17 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.05948, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.05948 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16600, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16600 de Graaff, A.,...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0f17 2025

  27. [27]

    2009, ApJ, 694, 302, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/302

    Devecchi, B., & Volonteri, M. 2009, ApJ, 694, 302, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/302

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/1/302 2009

  28. [28]

    2018, ApJS, 239, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaee8c

    Diemer, B. 2018, ApJS, 239, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaee8c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaee8c 2018

  29. [29]

    2014, MNRAS, 442, 2036, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1007

    Dijkstra, M., Ferrara, A., & Mesinger, A. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2036, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1007

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1007 2014

  30. [30]

    Dijkstra, M., Haiman, Z., Mesinger, A., & Wyithe, J. S. B. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14031.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14031.x 2008

  31. [31]

    T., & Bertoldi, F

    Draine, B. T., & Bertoldi, F. 1996, ApJ, 468, 269, doi: 10.1086/177689

    work page doi:10.1086/177689 1996

  32. [32]

    Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES)

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02465

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.02465 2023

  33. [33]

    P., et al

    Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.20452, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.20452 20

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.20452 2025

  34. [34]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 2410, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1280

    Ferrara, A., Salvadori, S., Yue, B., & Schleicher, D. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2410, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1280

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1280 2014

  35. [35]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 2023

  36. [36]

    J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8 2024

  37. [37]

    J., Allingham, J

    Golubchik, M., Furtak, L. J., Allingham, J. F. V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.02117, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.02117

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02117 2025

  38. [38]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  39. [39]

    H., Springel, V., White, S

    Greif, T. H., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/75

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/75 2011

  40. [40]

    A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D

    Guia, C. A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D. D. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 207, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad7262 Haemmerl´ e, L., Woods, T. E., Klessen, R. S., Heger, A., &

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad7262 2024

  41. [41]

    Whalen, D. J. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 2757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2919

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2919 2018

  42. [42]

    2013, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    Haiman, Z. 2013, in Astrophysics and Space Science

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    396, The First Galaxies, ed

    Library, Vol. 396, The First Galaxies, ed. T. Wiklind, B. Mobasher, & V. Bromm, 293, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1 6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1

  44. [44]

    J., & Loeb, A

    Haiman, Z., Rees, M. J., & Loeb, A. 1997, ApJ, 476, 458, doi: 10.1086/303647

    work page doi:10.1086/303647 1997

  45. [45]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.02211, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.02211 Herrero-Carri´ on, D., Spinoso, D., Izquierdo-Villalba, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.10725, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.10725

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.02211 2024

  46. [46]

    2017, Science, 357, 1375, doi: 10.1126/science.aai9119

    Hirano, S., Hosokawa, T., Yoshida, N., & Kuiper, R. 2017, Science, 357, 1375, doi: 10.1126/science.aai9119

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aai9119 2017

  47. [47]

    2016, ApJ, 824, 119, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/119

    Hosokawa, T., Hirano, S., Kuiper, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824, 119, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/119

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/824/2/119 2016

  48. [48]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  49. [49]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.05459, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.05459

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05459 2025

  50. [50]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 1549, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1870

    Inayoshi, K., & Haiman, Z. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1549, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1870

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1870 2014

  51. [51]

    Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03130, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03130

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.03130 2025

  52. [52]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  53. [53]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 2020

  54. [54]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.14155, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.14155

    Jeon, J., Liu, B., Bromm, V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.14155, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.14155

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.14155 2025

  55. [55]

    2025, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.03872, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.03872

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1867 2025

  56. [56]

    J., Matthee, J., et al

    Kashino, D., Lilly, S. J., Matthee, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc588

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc588 2023

  57. [57]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  58. [58]

    K., Richard, J., Jauzac, M., et al

    Knudsen, K. K., Richard, J., Jauzac, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.05097, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.05097

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.05097 2025

  59. [59]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03576, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.03576 2024

  60. [60]

    P., et al

    Kokorev, V., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07515, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.07515 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.07515 2025

  61. [61]

    E., Matthee, J., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04557 2024

  62. [62]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.09607

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R., Hutchison, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.09607

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09607 2025

  63. [63]

    A., Bovino, S., Van Borm, C., et al

    Latif, M. A., Bovino, S., Van Borm, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1979, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1230

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1230 2014

  64. [64]

    A., Niemeyer, J

    Latif, M. A., Niemeyer, J. C., & Schleicher, D. R. G. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2969, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu489

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu489 2014

  65. [65]

    A., Omukai, K., Habouzit, M., Schleicher, D

    Latif, M. A., Omukai, K., Habouzit, M., Schleicher, D. R. G., & Volonteri, M. 2016, ApJ, 823, 40, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/40

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/1/40 2016

  66. [66]

    2013, MNRAS, 433, 1607, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt834

    Niemeyer, J. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 1607, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt834

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt834 2013

  67. [67]

    Leung, G. C. K., Finkelstein, S. L., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfcce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfcce 2025

  68. [68]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y. 2025, ApJ, 994, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c19 2025

  69. [69]

    J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T

    Lodato, G., & Natarajan, P. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1813, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10801.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10801.x 2006

  70. [70]

    2007, MNRAS, 377, L64, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00304.x

    Lodato, G., & Natarajan, P. 2007, MNRAS, 377, L64, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00304.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00304.x 2007

  71. [71]

    Loeb, A., & Rasio, F. A. 1994, ApJ, 432, 52, doi: 10.1086/174548

    work page doi:10.1086/174548 1994

  72. [72]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08032, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08032 21

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08032 2025

  73. [73]

    E., Bryan, G

    Machacek, M. E., Bryan, G. L., & Abel, T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 509, doi: 10.1086/319014

    work page doi:10.1086/319014 2001

  74. [74]

    A black hole in a near-pristine galaxy 700 million years after the Big Bang

    Maiolino, R., Uebler, H., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.22567, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.22567

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22567 2025

  75. [75]

    2025, Contemporary Physics, 66, 116, doi: 10.1080/00107514.2025.2586370

    Matthee, J. 2025, Contemporary Physics, 66, 116, doi: 10.1080/00107514.2025.2586370

    work page doi:10.1080/00107514.2025.2586370 2025

  76. [76]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  77. [77]

    P., Kotiwale, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Kotiwale, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 246, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade886 M´ erida, R. M., Gaspar, G., Sawicki, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A317, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553943

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade886 2025

  78. [78]

    2025, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2511.20484

    Morel, I., Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.20484, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.20484

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.20484 2025

  79. [79]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  80. [80]

    The formation and evolution of massive black hole seeds in the early Universe

    Natarajan, P. 2011, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 39, 145, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1104.4797

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1104.4797 2011

Showing first 80 references.