pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23778 · v1 · pith:DRJCRS26new · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Constraints on the Gas Geometry Surrounding Little Red Dots through Narrow-Line Diagnostics

Visal Sok , Erica J. Nelson , Mitchell C. Begelman , Jason Dexter , Francesco D'Eugenio , Jenny E. Greene , Joel Leja , Katherine E. Whitaker
show 5 more authors
Andrew J. Bunker Pablo G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez Pierluigi Rinaldi Alberto Torralba Hannah \"Ubler
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 08:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords little red dotsnarrow-line diagnosticsgas geometryhigh-redshift galaxiesphotoionizationactive galactic nucleiblack hole accretion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Narrow-line ratios in Little Red Dots show their gas envelopes contain lower-density channels that let high-energy photons escape.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes multiple line-ratio diagnostics from high signal-to-noise NIRSpec spectra of roughly twenty Little Red Dots to test whether their narrow-line emission can be powered solely by stars in the host galaxy. It finds that at least forty percent of the objects show ratios indicating high ionization parameter and electron temperature, with additional objects falling in the AGN regime on the O I to H alpha diagnostic. These ratios cannot be reproduced by stellar photoionization alone. Most objects also lack strong He II emission, consistent with a softer ionizing spectrum than typical active galaxies. The combination indicates that the surrounding gas cannot be a uniform envelope with complete covering fraction.

Core claim

The central claim is that the observed narrow-line ratios are incompatible with stellar photoionization from a star-forming host alone, indicating lower-density channels within the gas envelope through which high-energy photons escape to excite the narrow-line gas, while the soft spectrum with He II over H beta less than or equal to 0.1 disfavours a uniform gas envelope with unity covering fraction and instead points to a more complex geometry producing anisotropic ionizing radiation.

What carries the argument

Narrow-line ratio diagnostics applied to NIRSpec grating spectra, including indicators of ionization parameter, electron temperature, and ionizing spectrum hardness such as O III to H beta, O I to H alpha, and He II to H beta.

If this is right

  • At least forty percent of the sample requires a harder ionizing source than stars provide.
  • The gas envelope must include lower-density paths for high-energy photons to reach the narrow-line region.
  • A spherical shell with full covering fraction around the central engine is inconsistent with the data.
  • The ionizing spectrum reaching the narrow-line gas is softer than that of standard active galactic nuclei.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The patchy geometry could allow partial direct leakage of continuum light from the central engine in certain directions.
  • Similar line-ratio tests could be applied to other high-redshift populations suspected of having dense gas envelopes.
  • If the channels are common, they may affect how much of the central radiation is reprocessed into the observed red continuum.

Load-bearing premise

The photoionization models and line-ratio diagnostics used to classify the ionizing source are accurate and complete for the physical conditions in these objects, with no major unaccounted contamination or calibration issues.

What would settle it

If deeper spectra or a larger sample showed every Little Red Dot with line ratios fully consistent with pure stellar photoionization under the same models, the requirement for escaping high-energy photons through channels would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23778 by Alberto Torralba, Andrew J. Bunker, Erica J. Nelson, Francesco D'Eugenio, Hannah \"Ubler, Jason Dexter, Jenny E. Greene, Joel Leja, Katherine E. Whitaker, Mitchell C. Begelman, Pablo G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez, Pierluigi Rinaldi, Visal Sok.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A few examples of the best-fit spectral model ordered by the signal-to-noise ratio of Hγ, showing the regions around key emission lines used in our AGN diagnostic analysis (see §4.1). The black line shows the best-fit model, with different colours denoting observed spectra with different dispersers. 2023). For most plausible densities (ne ≲ 105 cm−3 ), the O33 ratio probes Te(O++), the temperature of the [… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: We show the location of LRDs in different narrow-line diagnostic diagrams. The solid markers show the line ratios with S/N greater than 3, while the open markers show line ratios with S/N greater than 2 but less than 3. The shaded regions show the star-forming locus as defined in the literature. We also show stellar photoionization grids based on cloudy modelling for different ionizing parameter (log U ∈ [… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top panel: Number of diagnostics identifying each LRD as an AGN. Bottom panel: The percentage of available diagnostics that classify each LRD as AGN-like. We find that at least half of LRDs show multiple line diagnostics consistent with AGN photoionization. 4.2. Are the Line Diagnostics Consistent? Given the range of results from different diagnostic tools, we now investigate whether they provide con￾siste… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An UpSet diagram showing how the AGN classifi￾cations from different line diagnostics overlap. Here non-de￾tections are treated as non-AGN, so the percentages repre￾sent lower limits. The bar plot on the top right shows the number of LRDs with overlapping diagnostics. At least 38% of LRDs have line ratios consistent with high ionization pa￾rameter and electron temperature but with a non-AGN-like ratio for … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A cross section of the possible gaseous structure surrounding LRDs. Incident radiation that goes through the higher gas columns will result in the Balmer break and absorption features observed in LRDs. The AGN-like line ratios suggest that there are low-density channels, possibly analogous to funnel-like regions, where the incident radiation is not reprocessed. Mazzolari et al. 2025). This implies that the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Little Red Dots (LRDs) are a recently identified population of high-redshift sources, with a common interpretation being accreting black holes embedded within a spherical, optically thick gas envelope. Within this framework, some models propose that the continuum arises from the dense-gas envelope, where hard ionizing radiation from the central engine is reprocessed into a stellar-like photosphere with an effective temperature of $\sim$5000 K. This implies that both the UV continuum and narrow-line emission are then powered by the host galaxy rather than an exposed central engine. To test whether this is consistent with the observed narrow-line ratios, we analyze multiple line diagnostics for a sample of $\sim$20 LRDs with high signal-to-noise NIRSpec grating spectra. We find that at least 40\% of the LRDs have line ratios pointing toward high ionization parameter and electron temperature, with a further 15\% also falling in the AGN regime for the O\textsc{i}/H$\alpha$ diagnostic, indicative of harder ionizing radiation. These line ratios are incompatible with stellar photoionization from a star-forming host alone. This suggests lower density channels within the gas envelope through which high energy photons can escape and excite the surrounding narrow-line emitting gas. At the same time, most LRDs lack strong high-ionization line emission, with He\,\textsc{ii}/H$\beta$ $\lesssim0.1$, consistent with an ionizing spectrum softer than that of a standard AGN. Together, these results disfavour a uniform gas envelope with a covering fraction of unity, and instead point to a more complex geometry that gives rise to anisotropic ionizing radiation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes narrow-line ratios from high-S/N NIRSpec grating spectra of ~20 Little Red Dots. It reports that at least 40% of the sample show line ratios indicating high ionization parameter and electron temperature, with a further 15% falling in the AGN regime on the O I/Hα diagnostic. These ratios are interpreted as incompatible with stellar photoionization from a star-forming host alone, implying the need for lower-density channels in the gas envelope to allow high-energy photons to escape and excite the narrow-line gas. Most sources lack strong He II/Hβ (≲0.1), consistent with a softer ionizing spectrum than typical AGN, disfavoring a uniform spherical envelope with unity covering fraction.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies direct observational constraints on LRD gas geometry, favoring anisotropic configurations with escape channels over simple spherical envelopes that reprocess AGN radiation into a ~5000 K stellar-like photosphere. The multi-diagnostic approach (ionization parameter, electron temperature, O I/Hα, and He II) and purely observational comparison to standard grids constitute a falsifiable test of envelope models. This strengthens the case for complex geometries in high-redshift compact sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [section presenting the line-ratio diagnostics and model comparison] The claim that observed ratios are incompatible with stellar photoionization (and therefore require escape channels) rests on standard BPT-style and ionization-parameter diagnostics. These were calibrated on lower-density (n_H ~10^2–10^4 cm^{-3}) and typically sub-solar metallicity H II regions; the manuscript does not show that the employed model grids extend to the n_H ≳ 10^5–10^6 cm^{-3} or Z ≳ 2 Z_⊙ regimes plausible inside a dense LRD envelope. If stellar SEDs can shift into the observed region of diagnostic space under those conditions, the incompatibility conclusion and the inference of channels would not follow.
  2. [results section reporting the diagnostic placements and percentages] The percentages (at least 40% for high U/T_e and a further 15% for O I/Hα) are central to the sample-wide claim, yet the text provides no explicit breakdown of how many objects have reliable measurements for each diagnostic, how upper limits or non-detections are treated, or the impact of measurement uncertainties on the fractions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states the sample as '~20'; stating the precise number of LRDs with usable spectra and the selection criteria would improve reproducibility.
  2. Figures showing line-ratio placements should explicitly indicate whether error bars or 1σ uncertainties are included for each point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important points regarding the applicability of diagnostic grids and the transparency of our sample statistics. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section presenting the line-ratio diagnostics and model comparison] The claim that observed ratios are incompatible with stellar photoionization (and therefore require escape channels) rests on standard BPT-style and ionization-parameter diagnostics. These were calibrated on lower-density (n_H ~10^2–10^4 cm^{-3}) and typically sub-solar metallicity H II regions; the manuscript does not show that the employed model grids extend to the n_H ≳ 10^5–10^6 cm^{-3} or Z ≳ 2 Z_⊙ regimes plausible inside a dense LRD envelope. If stellar SEDs can shift into the observed region of diagnostic space under those conditions, the incompatibility conclusion and the inference of channels would not follow.

    Authors: We acknowledge this is a valid concern. Our comparisons use publicly available photoionization grids (primarily from Cloudy-based libraries such as those in Kewley et al. and similar works) that reach n_H up to ~10^5 cm^{-3} and metallicities up to ~2 Z_⊙ in some cases, but do not fully sample the extreme n_H ≳ 10^6 cm^{-3} regime. Literature on dense H II regions indicates that while higher density can enhance certain collisionally excited lines, the combination of high ionization parameter and elevated T_e required to match our observed ratios remains difficult to achieve with stellar SEDs alone, even at super-solar Z. Nevertheless, to directly address the referee's point we will add an explicit discussion of density and metallicity trends (citing high-density H II region studies) and note the limitation of current grids as a caveat. We will also state that full exploration at n_H > 10^6 cm^{-3} would require new model runs beyond the scope of this work. This does not change our main conclusion but improves transparency. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [results section reporting the diagnostic placements and percentages] The percentages (at least 40% for high U/T_e and a further 15% for O I/Hα) are central to the sample-wide claim, yet the text provides no explicit breakdown of how many objects have reliable measurements for each diagnostic, how upper limits or non-detections are treated, or the impact of measurement uncertainties on the fractions.

    Authors: We agree that the presentation of the sample statistics requires greater clarity. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix table) that lists, for each of the ~20 objects: (i) which diagnostics have reliable detections, (ii) which are upper limits, (iii) the S/N threshold used, and (iv) the individual line ratios with uncertainties. We will explicitly state how many objects contribute to each percentage (e.g., number with measured [O III]/Hβ and [N II]/Hα for the BPT, number with [O I]/Hα detections), how non-detections are treated (conservatively as upper limits), and the results of a simple Monte Carlo test propagating measurement errors to show the stability of the 40% and 15% fractions. This will make the reported numbers fully reproducible and address the referee's concern directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational line ratios compared to external diagnostics

full rationale

The paper measures emission-line ratios from NIRSpec spectra of LRDs and places them on standard BPT-style and ionization-parameter diagnostic diagrams calibrated on external photoionization models. No step fits a parameter to a subset of the LRD data and then re-uses that fit as a 'prediction' of the same or closely related quantity. No self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the present analysis depends upon. The incompatibility conclusion follows directly from the observed ratios versus published model grids; the derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard narrow-line diagnostic diagrams and photoionization grids from the broader AGN literature; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard optical line-ratio diagnostics (e.g., O I/Hα, ionization parameter indicators) reliably distinguish stellar versus AGN ionization under the physical conditions of high-redshift LRDs.
    Invoked when interpreting the observed ratios as evidence against pure stellar photoionization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5890 in / 1252 out tokens · 16375 ms · 2026-06-26T08:06:03.641195+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Crespo G´ omez, A., Colina, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A250, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451731

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  3. [3]

    Ando, M., Harikane, Y., Katz, H., Inayoshi, K., & Tanaka, T. S. 2026, The UV Side of Little Red Dots: Red, Compact, and Iron-Enhanced Rest-UV Emission with a Strong Downturn around Lyα, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03522

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

    Asada, Y., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10573

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10573 2026

  5. [5]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Cleri, N. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3919

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3919 2022

  6. [6]

    E., Bridge, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Bridge, J. S., Trump, J. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca668

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca668 2023

  7. [7]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Pirzkal, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520 2024

  8. [8]

    E., Cleri, N

    Backhaus, B. E., Cleri, N. J., Trump, J. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1136

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1136 2025

  9. [9]

    Baggen, J. F. W., Scoggins, M. T., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2026, ApJL, 1002, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae58a5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae58a5 2026

  10. [10]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

  11. [11]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a 2026

  13. [13]

    2006, MNRAS, 367, 737, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10006.x

    Begelman, M. C., Volonteri, M., & Rees, M. J. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 289, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10467.x 2006

  14. [14]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf 2024

  15. [15]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    Brammer, G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319596 2023

  16. [16]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.15472354 , url =

    Brammer, G., & Valentino, F. 2025, The DAWN JWST Archive: Compilation of Public NIRSpec Spectra, 4.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15472354

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15472354 2025

  17. [17]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.22214, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.22214

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.22214 2026

  18. [18]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    Brinchmann, J. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1704 2023

  19. [19]

    2008, A&A, 485, 657, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809783

    Brinchmann, J., Kunth, D., & Durret, F. 2008, A&A, 485, 657, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809783

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809783 2008

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Bunker, A. J., Cameron, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A288, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347094 Calabr` o, A., Castellano, M., Zavala, J. A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 245, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7602 12

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347094 2024

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Kokorev, V., et al. 2024, ApJL, 975, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7 2024

  22. [22]

    Chen, K., Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJL, 994, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1955

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1955 2025

  23. [23]

    A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15935, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.15935

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.15935 2026

  24. [24]

    P., Whitaker, K

    Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.24700, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.24700

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24700 2026

  25. [25]

    J., Bunker, A

    Curtis-Lake, E., Cameron, A. J., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2026, MNRAS, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stag836 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Carniani, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, A&A, 701, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554681 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag836 2026

  26. [26]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163 2026

  27. [27]

    Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis Version 2.1: construction, observational verification and new results

    Eldridge, J. J., Stanway, E. R., Xiao, L., et al. 2017, PASA, 34, e058, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.51

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.51 2017

  28. [28]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2025, ApJL, 983, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3 2025

  29. [29]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  31. [31]

    M., van Hoof, P

    Gunasekera, C. M., van Hoof, P. A. M., Dehghanian, M., et al. 2025, RMxAA, 61, 120, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2025.61.03.01

    work page doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2025.61.03.01 2025

  32. [32]

    B., Perna, R., Cantiello, M., et al

    Hassan, J. B., Perna, R., Cantiello, M., et al. 2026, ApJ, 998, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3002

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3002 2026

  33. [33]

    E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890, doi: 10.1126/science.adj0343

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adj0343 2024

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Hopkins, P. F., Murray, N., Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A. 2010, MNRAS, 401, L19, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00777.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00777.x 2010

  35. [35]

    , title =

    Horne, K. 1986, PASP, 98, 609, doi: 10.1086/131801

    work page doi:10.1086/131801 1986

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555816

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555816 2025

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Liu, H., et al. 2026, ApJL, 1000, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c88

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4c88 2026

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  39. [39]

    2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf376 2023

  40. [40]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370

    Ji, X., Pezzulli, G., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03370

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    L., Kocevski, D

    Jones, B. L., Kocevski, D. D., Pacucci, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.07376, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.07376 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Marconcini, C., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.21748, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.21748 Juodˇ zbal...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.07376 2025

  42. [42]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Leitherer, C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/100

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/2/100 2013

  43. [43]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1898

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 2023

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e 2025

  47. [47]

    The case for super-Eddington accretion in JWST broad-line AGN during the first billion years

    Lambrides, E., Garofali, K., Larson, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.13047, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.13047 2024

  48. [48]

    The GlimmIr: Spectroscopic Variability in a z~7 LRD Indicates Rapid Changes in Both the Narrow and Broad Line Regions

    Lambrides, E., Hutchison, T. A., Larson, R. L., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.25991, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.25991

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.25991 2026

  49. [49]

    L., Finkelstein, S

    Larson, R. L., Finkelstein, S. L., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2023, ApJL, 953, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace619

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace619 2023

  50. [50]

    How I Wonder What You Are -- JWST's Little Red Dots do not TWINKLE

    Liu, Z., Naidu, R. P., Secunda, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.13000, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.13000

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.13000 2026

  51. [51]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323152 2015

  52. [52]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Madau, P. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.09854, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09854 13

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.09854 2025

  53. [53]

    Little red dots as obscured little blue dots: relative abundances, luminosities, and black-hole masses

    Madau, P., & Maiolino, R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.05074, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.05074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.05074 2026

  54. [54]

    Wings of little dots: Exponential broad lines from a stratified BLR

    Madau, P., Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., & D’Eugenio, F. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.04216, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.04216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.04216 2026

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  56. [56]

    A., James, B

    Martinez, Z., Berg, D. A., James, B. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae17c6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae17c6 2025

  57. [57]

    V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al

    Maseda, M. V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449914

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449914 2024

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345 2024

  59. [59]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17667 2026

  60. [60]

    arXiv , author =:2404.10811 , journal =

    Mazzolari, G., ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A345, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450407

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450407 2024

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Mazzolari, G., Scholtz, J., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451860

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451860 2025

  62. [62]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16596 2025

  63. [63]

    2026, ApJ, 998, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae32f3

    Nandal, D., & Loeb, A. 2026, ApJ, 998, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae32f3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae32f3 2026

  64. [64]

    Pacucci, F., Ferrara, A., & Kocevski, D. D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14368, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14368

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14368 2026

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    Pacucci, F., & Narayan, R. 2024, ApJ, 976, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7 P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Barro, G., Carniani, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.20247, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.20247

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84f7 2024

  66. [66]

    H., Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., et al

    Price, S. H., Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1 2025

  67. [67]

    G., Rieke, G

    Rinaldi, P., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae089c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae089c 2025

  68. [68]

    The Way We Tally Becomes the Tale: the Impact of Selection Strategies on the Inferred Evolution of Little Red Dots Across Cosmic Time

    Rinaldi, P., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.07138, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.07138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.07138 2026

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4 2026

  70. [70]

    2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8

    Sacchi, A., & Bogd´ an,´A. 2025, ApJL, 989, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf5c8 2025

  71. [71]

    D., Campbell, C

    Santarelli, A. D., Campbell, C. B., Farag, E., et al. 2026, ApJ, 998, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae371e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae371e 2026

  72. [72]

    Sarrouh, G. T. E., Asada, Y., Martis, N. S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 282, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1611

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae1611 2026

  73. [73]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Scholtz, J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.22277

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.22277 2026

  74. [74]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025a, ApJL, 991, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b 2041

  75. [75]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., de Graaff, A., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 995, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1500

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1500

  76. [76]

    Adelberger, K. L. 2004, ApJ, 612, 108, doi: 10.1086/422467

    work page doi:10.1086/422467 2004

  77. [77]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.12713, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.12713

    Shen, Y., Zhuang, M.-Y., Li, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.12713, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.12713

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.12713 2024

  78. [78]

    2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    Shirazi, M., & Brinchmann, J. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1043, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20439.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20439.x 2012

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Plat, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 217, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57 2025

  80. [80]

    SPURS: Evidence for Clumpy Neutral Envelopes and Ionized IGM Surrounding Little Red Dots in Abell 2744 from Ultra-Deep Rest-UV Spectroscopy

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Mason, C. A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03563, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.03563

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03563 2026

Showing first 80 references.