Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 52 references

QCD Sum Rule Analysis of a Compact $D^{+}D^{-}K^{+}$-Like Hidden-Charm Hexaquark with $J^{P}=0^{-}$

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read QCD sum rules estimate the mass of a J^P=0- hidden-charm hexaquark at 3.94 to 4.41 GeV.

desk verdict Standard QCD sum-rule mass estimate for a DDK-like hexaquark that falls inside the three-meson threshold, with the usual parameter dependence and no extra check on continuum pollution. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.05638 v1 pith:C2MUWYEB submitted 2026-06-04 hep-ph hep-ex

Jing-Yi Yan , Wen-Shuai Zhang , Liang Tang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords hidden-charmhexaquarkQCDsumrulesinterpolatingcurrentsexotichadronsoperatorproductexpansionBorelwindowcontinuumthresholdcolor-octetclusters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper applies QCD sum rules to a compact hexaquark configuration sharing the quark content of D+ D- K+. Six local interpolating currents with J^P=0- are built from three color-octet quark-antiquark clusters coupled to an overall singlet. Two-point correlation functions are computed with perturbative terms and nonperturbative condensates through dimension ten in the operator product expansion. Within Borel windows meeting standard criteria and with suitable continuum thresholds, the ground-state mass emerges in the interval 3.94-4.41 GeV. The result supplies a concrete mass window for experimental searches of this exotic state.

What carries the argument

Six independent local interpolating currents with J^P=0- constructed from three color-octet quark-antiquark clusters.

What would settle it

A QCD sum rule analysis that yields no stable mass pole inside the 3.94-4.41 GeV window under the stated Borel and threshold conditions, or an experimental search that finds no resonance with these quantum numbers in that interval.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Our analysis indicates that, within Borel windows satisfying standard sum rule criteria and with a reasonable choice of continuum threshold, the mass of the J^P=0− hidden-charm hexaquark state is estimated to be in the range 3.94--4.41 GeV.

Load-bearing premise

The six chosen local interpolating currents actually couple strongly to a compact hexaquark ground state rather than to scattering states or other configurations, and the operator product expansion truncated at dimension ten plus the chosen Borel window reliably isolates that state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The mass range supplies a direct target for experimental identification of the hidden-charm hexaquark.
  • The state is predicted to appear as a compact configuration rather than a loosely bound molecular state.
  • Higher-dimensional condensates up to dimension ten are required to achieve stability in the sum-rule windows.
  • The same framework of three color-octet clusters can be extended to other hidden-charm hexaquark quantum numbers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the state exists at this mass, it is likely to be produced and decay in channels involving D mesons and kaons.
  • The prediction could be cross-checked by lattice QCD calculations of the same six-quark operator.
  • Observation or non-observation would constrain models of few-body hadronic dynamics for the DDK system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies QCD sum rules to six local interpolating currents for a compact hidden-charm hexaquark with J^P=0^- constructed from three color-octet quark-antiquark clusters. Including perturbative terms and condensates up to dimension 10 in the OPE, the authors identify Borel windows satisfying standard criteria and extract a mass in the interval 3.94-4.41 GeV for a reasonable choice of continuum threshold.

Significance. Should the central assumption hold—that the chosen currents have dominant overlap with a compact hexaquark ground state rather than DDK scattering states—the result would provide a useful benchmark for experimental searches of exotic hexaquarks in the hidden-charm sector. The use of multiple currents and high-dimensional condensates adds robustness to the OPE side.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported mass interval 3.94--4.41 GeV spans 0.47 GeV and overlaps the D^+D^-K^+ threshold near 4.2 GeV; this breadth shows that the extracted mass depends sensitively on the adjusted values of the continuum threshold s_0 and Borel mass M^2, both free parameters whose specific choices directly determine the numerical result.
  2. [Abstract] The analysis assumes the six J^P=0^- currents couple dominantly to a single compact hexaquark pole, yet the same currents create three-meson scattering states whose thresholds lie inside the quoted window; standard sum-rule criteria (pole dominance, OPE convergence to dim 10) do not automatically suppress multi-particle cuts, and no explicit check of the residue against threshold behavior is provided.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported mass interval 3.94--4.41 GeV spans 0.47 GeV and overlaps the D^+D^-K^+ threshold near 4.2 GeV; this breadth shows that the extracted mass depends sensitively on the adjusted values of the continuum threshold s_0 and Borel mass M^2, both free parameters whose specific choices directly determine the numerical result.

    Authors: The quoted interval is obtained by collecting the central mass values extracted from the six independent interpolating currents, each analyzed in its own Borel window with a continuum threshold s_0 chosen so that the pole contribution is at least 50% and the dimension-10 OPE converges. Within each individual window the extracted mass is stable against moderate variations of M^2, as required by the standard sum-rule criteria. The spread therefore reflects the variation across different current choices rather than an uncontrolled sensitivity. We will revise the abstract to state this explicitly and to note the proximity of the predicted window to the D^+D^-K^+ threshold. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The analysis assumes the six J^P=0^- currents couple dominantly to a single compact hexaquark pole, yet the same currents create three-meson scattering states whose thresholds lie inside the quoted window; standard sum-rule criteria (pole dominance, OPE convergence to dim 10) do not automatically suppress multi-particle cuts, and no explicit check of the residue against threshold behavior is provided.

    Authors: We agree that local interpolating currents can couple to both compact multiquark configurations and to multi-meson scattering states, and that the usual Borel-window criteria do not automatically eliminate the latter. The present analysis is performed under the working assumption of dominant overlap with a compact state, motivated by the color-octet cluster construction of the currents. An explicit decomposition of the spectral density into compact-pole and scattering contributions lies outside the scope of a standard QCD sum-rule study and would require additional techniques. We will add a brief remark in the manuscript acknowledging this inherent limitation of the method. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Mass estimate depends on chosen continuum threshold and Borel window

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "within Borel windows satisfying standard sum rule criteria and with a reasonable choice of continuum threshold, the mass of the J^{P}=0^{-} hidden-charm hexaquark state is estimated to be in the range 3.94--4.41 GeV. This prediction can provide a valuable theoretical reference"

    The mass range is produced only after the continuum threshold is chosen 'reasonably' and Borel windows are selected to satisfy the sum-rule criteria; the extracted mass is therefore determined by these adjustable inputs rather than being fixed by the OPE side without such choices.

full rationale

The derivation uses standard QCD sum-rule machinery: the two-point correlator is computed via OPE (perturbative + condensates to dim-10), Borel-transformed, and matched to a phenomenological pole plus continuum. The mass is then extracted from the ratio of moments after selecting a Borel window (for OPE convergence and pole dominance) and a continuum threshold s0. The quoted range 3.94-4.41 GeV is obtained precisely by varying these inputs within 'reasonable' values that satisfy the criteria; the numerical output is therefore a function of the chosen s0 and window rather than a parameter-free result from the OPE alone. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. No self-citation, self-definitional, or uniqueness-theorem steps appear in the supplied text, and the central OPE calculation itself remains independent content. The physical assumption that the currents couple dominantly to a compact hexaquark (rather than DDK scattering states) is a modeling choice, not a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The mass extraction rests on standard QCD sum-rule machinery plus choices for the continuum threshold and Borel window; the hexaquark itself is introduced as a compact configuration without independent experimental evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • continuum threshold s0
    Chosen reasonably to suppress higher states; directly affects the mass window extracted from the sum rule.
  • Borel mass M^2
    Window selected to satisfy standard sum-rule criteria of pole dominance and OPE convergence.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The operator product expansion of the correlation function is valid and can be truncated at dimension ten
    Invoked when including perturbative and condensate contributions up to dim 10.
  • domain assumption The local interpolating currents couple to the desired compact hexaquark state
    Assumed when constructing the six currents with J^P=0-.
invented entities (1)
  • compact D+D-K+ like hidden-charm hexaquark
    purpose: To model the exotic six-quark bound state with the given quark content and quantum numbers
    Postulated configuration; no independent experimental evidence supplied in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QCD Sum Rule Analysis of a Compact $D^{+}D^{-}K^{+}$-Like Hidden-Charm Hexaquark with $J^{P}=0^{-}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C2MUWYEB

@misc{pith2026260605638,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QCD Sum Rule Analysis of a Compact $D^+D^-K^+$-Like Hidden-Charm Hexaquark with $J^P=0^-$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C2MUWYEB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.05638}
}
abstract

In this work, we study a compact hexaquark configuration motivated by the same quark content as $D^{+} D^{-} K^+$ using QCD sum rules, where the $D D K$ system has been extensively studied within theoretical frameworks of few-body hadronic dynamics and coupled-channel interactions. The state is constructed from three color-octet quark--antiquark clusters coupled to an overall color singlet. We construct six independent local interpolating currents with the quantum numbers $J^{P}=0^{-}$ and analyze the corresponding two-point correlation functions. Both perturbative contributions and nonperturbative condensates up to dimension ten are included in the operator product expansion. Our analysis indicates that, within Borel windows satisfying standard sum rule criteria and with a reasonable choice of continuum threshold, the mass of the $J^{P}=0^{-}$ hidden-charm hexaquark state is estimated to be in the range $3.94$--$4.41~\mathrm{GeV}$. This prediction can provide a valuable theoretical reference for identifying such exotic hidden-charm hexaquark state in future experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05638 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Shown here are the Feynman diagrams for the hexaquark s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The figures for current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The masses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The same caption as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    are displayed in Fig. 1. On the phenomenological side, after isolating the ground-s tate contribution of the hex- aquark state, the phenomenological representation of the c orrelation function Π i(q2) can be 6 FIG. 1: Shown here are the Feynman diagrams for the hexaquark s tate with three color-octet clusters, where only representative topologies are disp...

  2. [2]

    Gell-Mann ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3 journal journal Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, “A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons,” Phys. Lett. 8, 214–215 (1964) 10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-9163(64)92001-3 1964

  3. [3]

    An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1,

    G. Zweig, “An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. Version 1,” CERN- TH-401

  4. [4]

    Perhaps a Stable Dihyperon,

    R. L. Jaffe, “Perhaps a Stable Dihyperon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 195–198 (1977) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 617 (1977)] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.195

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.195 1977

  5. [5]

    Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell and E. S. Swanson, “Heavy-Quark QC D Exotica,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143–194 (2017) 10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 [arXiv:1610.04528 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003 2017

  6. [6]

    The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “The hidden-charm pen taquark and tetraquark states,” Phys. Rept. 639, 1–121 (2016) 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 [arXiv:1601.02092 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 2016

  7. [7]

    Evidence for a New Resonance from Polarized Neutron-Proton Scattering

    P. Adlarson et al. [W ASA-at-COSY], “Evidence for a New Resonance from Polarized Neu tron- Proton Scattering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 202301 (2014) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.202301 [arXiv:1402.6844 [nucl-ex]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.202301 2014

  8. [8]

    Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B+ -> K+ pi+pi- J/psi decays

    S. K. Choi et al. [Belle], “Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B± → K ±π +π −J/ψ decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.262001 [arXiv:hep-ex/0309032 [hep-ex]]

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.262001 2003

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Evidence for exotic hadron contributions to Λ 0 b → J/ψpπ − decays,

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Evidence for exotic hadron contributions to Λ 0 b → J/ψpπ − decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082003 (2016) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.082003 [arXiv:1606.06999 [hep-ex]]

    2016 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+,

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], “Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222001 [arXiv:1904.03947 [hep-ex]]

    2019 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks,

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange and S. Stone, “Exotics: Heavy Pentaquarks and Tetraquarks,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123–198 (2017) 10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08.003 [arXiv:1706.00610 [hep-ph]]

    2017 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    Multiquark Resonances ,

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni and A. D. Polosa, “Multiquark Resonances ,” Phys. Rept. 668, 1–97 (2017) 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002 [arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph]]

    2017 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives,

    J. M. Richard, “Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives,” Few Body Syst. 57, 1185–1212 (2016) 10.1007/s00601-016-1159-0 [arXiv:1606.08593 [hep-ph]]

    2016 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    Pentaquar k and Tetraquark states,

    Y. R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, “Pentaquar k and Tetraquark states,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237–320 (2019) 10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.04.003 [arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]]. 19

    2019 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in e+e− → π +π − J/ψ at √ s = 4 . 26 GeV,

    M. Ablikim et al. [BESIII], “Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure in e+e− → π +π − J/ψ at √ s = 4 . 26 GeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252001 [arXiv:1303.5949 [hep-ex]]

    2013 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives ,

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C. P. Shen, C . E. Thomas, A. Vairo and C. Z. Yuan, “The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives ,” Phys. Rept. 873, 1–154 (2020) 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.001 [arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]]

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass sp ectrum with the QCD sum rules,

    Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass sp ectrum with the QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 014018 (2020) 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014018 [arXiv:1908.07914 [hep-ph]]

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Hadronic molecules,

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B. S . Zou, “Hadronic molecules,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018) 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015004 [arXiv:1705.00141 [hep- ph]]

    2018 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Heavy quark spin selection rule and the propert ies of the X(3872),

    M. B. Voloshin, “Heavy quark spin selection rule and the propert ies of the X(3872),” Phys. Lett. B 604, 69–73 (2004) 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.11.003 [arXiv:hep-ph/0408321 [hep-ph]]

    2004 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Isospin breaking of the narrow charmonium s tate of Belle at 3872 MeV as a deuson,

    N. A. Tornqvist, “Isospin breaking of the narrow charmonium s tate of Belle at 3872 MeV as a deuson,” Phys. Lett. B 590, 209–215 (2004) 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.077 [arXiv:hep- ph/0402237 [hep-ph]]

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    Diquark-antidiq uarks with hid- den or open charm and the nature of X(3872),

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa and V. Riquer, “Diquark-antidiq uarks with hid- den or open charm and the nature of X(3872),” Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.014028 [arXiv:hep-ph/0412098 [hep-ph]]

    2005 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Analysis of the X(3872), Zc(3900) and Zc(3885) as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules,

    Z. G. Wang and T. Huang, “Analysis of the X(3872), Zc(3900) and Zc(3885) as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 054019 (2014) 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.054019 [arXiv:1310.2422 [hep-ph]]

    2014 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    How to reveal t he exotic nature of the Pc(4450),

    F. K. Guo, U. G. Meißner, W. Wang and Z. Yang, “How to reveal t he exotic nature of the Pc(4450),” Phys. Rev. D 92, 071502 (2015) 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.071502 [arXiv:1507.04950 [hep-ph]]

    2015 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Triangle Singularities and XYZ Quarkonium Pe aks,

    A. P. Szczepaniak, “Triangle Singularities and XYZ Quarkonium Pe aks,” Phys. Lett. B 747, 410–416 (2015) 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.029 [arXiv:1501.01691 [hep-ph]]

    2015 doi arXiv

  17. [25]

    Analysis of the scalar doubly charmed hexaquark s tate with QCD sum rules,

    Z. G. Wang, “Analysis of the scalar doubly charmed hexaquark s tate with QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 642 (2017), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5207-9 [arXiv:1707.09767 [hep-ph]]

    2017 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Study of Λ cΛ c dibaryon and Λ c ¯Λ c baryonium states via QCD sum rules,

    X. W. Wang, Z. G. Wang, and G. L. Yu, “Study of Λ cΛ c dibaryon and Λ c ¯Λ c baryonium states via QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 275 (2021), doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00576-8 [arXiv:2107.04751 [hep-ph]]

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    Hidden-bottom and -charm hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,

    B. D. Wan, L. Tang, and C. F. Qiao, “Hidden-bottom and -charm hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 121 (2020), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7701-8 [arXiv:1912.12046 20 [hep-ph]]

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    Mass spectra of Λ Q ¯Σ Q hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,

    X. H. Zhang and C. F. Qiao, “Mass spectra of Λ Q ¯Σ Q hexaquark states in QCD sum rules,” arXiv:2512.22019 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Mass spectra of 0 −− and 0 +− hidden-heavy baryoniums,

    B. D. Wan, “Mass spectra of 0 −− and 0 +− hidden-heavy baryoniums,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 760 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13126-5 [arXiv:2311.13161 [hep-ph]]

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Search for the Λ cΣ c and ¯Λ cΣ c dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,

    X. W. Wang, Z. G. Wang, and G. L. Yu, “Search for the Λ cΣ c and ¯Λ cΣ c dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,” arXiv:2604.14597 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Searching for hidden-charm baryonium signals in QCD sum rules,

    H. X. Chen, D. Zhou, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, “Searching for hidden-charm baryonium signals in QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 602 (2016), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4459-0 [arXiv:1605.07453 [hep-ph]]

    2016 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    Search for the charmed baryonium and dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,

    X. W. Wang and Z. G. Wang, “Search for the charmed baryonium and dibaryon structures via the QCD sum rules,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2022, 6224597 (2022), doi:10.1155/2022/6224597 [arXiv:2110.14133 [hep-ph]]

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Bou nd state formation in the DDK system,

    A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani and L. S. Geng, “Bou nd state formation in the DDK system,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 076017 (2019) 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.076017 [arXiv:1809.01059 [hep- ph]]

    2019 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    Excited K meson, Kc(4180), with hidden charm as a ¯D ¯DK bound state,

    T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu and L. S. Geng, “Excited K meson, Kc(4180), with hidden charm as a ¯D ¯DK bound state,” Phys. Rev. D 103, L031501 (2021) 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L031501 [arXiv:2102.08109 [hep-ph]]

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    DK , DDK , and DDDK molecules—understanding the nature of the D∗ s0(2317),

    T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu, L. S. Geng, E. Hiyama and M. P. Valderrama, “ DK , DDK , and DDDK molecules—understanding the nature of the D∗ s0(2317),” Phys. Rev. D 100, 034029 (2019) 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034029 [arXiv:1906.11995 [hep-ph]]

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Implication of the Existence o fJ P C = 0 −− ¯DsDK Bound State on the Nature of D∗ s0(2317), and a New Configuration of Exotic State,

    T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu and L. S. Geng, “Implication of the Existence o fJ P C = 0 −− ¯DsDK Bound State on the Nature of D∗ s0(2317), and a New Configuration of Exotic State,” Phys. Rev. Lett . 135, 031902 (2025) 10.1103/3gbb-ms8c [arXiv:2501.11358 [hep-ph]]

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Strong decays of the explicitly exotic doubly charmed DDK bound state,

    Y. Huang, M. Z. Liu, Y. W. Pan, L. S. Geng, A. Mart ´ ınez Torres and K. P. Khemchandani, “Strong decays of the explicitly exotic doubly charmed DDK bound state,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 014022 (2020) 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.014022 [arXiv:1909.09021 [hep-ph]]

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    Binding of the three- hadron DD∗K system from the lattice effective field theory,

    Z. Zhang, X. Y. Hu, G. He, J. Liu, J. A. Shi, B. N. Lu and Q. Wang, “Binding of the three- hadron DD∗K system from the lattice effective field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 036002 (2025) 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.036002 [arXiv:2409.01325 [hep-ph]]

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    QCD and Re sonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and Re sonance Physics. Theoretical Foundations,” Nucl. Phys. B 147, 385–447 (1979) 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90022-1

    1979 doi

  32. [40]

    QCD and Re sonance Physics: Applica- 21 tions,

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, “QCD and Re sonance Physics: Applica- 21 tions,” Nucl. Phys. B 147, 448–518 (1979) 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90023-3

    1979 doi

  33. [41]

    Hadron Propertie s from QCD Sum Rules,

    L. J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein and S. Yazaki, “Hadron Propertie s from QCD Sum Rules,” Phys. Rept. 127, 1 (1985) 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90065-1

    1985 doi

  34. [42]

    Charmonium Exotic States,

    R. M. Albuquerque, “Charmonium Exotic States,” arXiv:1306.467 1 [hep-ph]

  35. [43]

    Hybrid Quarkonia From QCD Sum Rules,

    J. Govaerts, L. J. Reinders, H. R. Rubinstein and J. Weyers, “ Hybrid Quarkonia From QCD Sum Rules,” Nucl. Phys. B 258, 215–229 (1985) 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90609-1

    1985 doi

  36. [44]

    QCD Sum Rules, a Modern Pers pective,

    P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, “QCD Sum Rules, a Modern Pers pective,” in At the Frontier of Particle Physics / Handbook of QCD , edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), Vol. 3, pp. 1495–1576 10.1142/9789812810458_0033 [arXiv:hep-ph/0010175]

    2001 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    QCD sum rules, a modern pers pective,

    P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, “QCD sum rules, a modern pers pective,” arXiv:hep- ph/0010175 [hep-ph]

  38. [46]

    QCD spectral sum rules,

    S. Narison, “QCD spectral sum rules,” World Sci. Lect. Notes Ph ys. 26, 1–527 (1989) 10.1142/9789812799265

    1989 doi

  39. [47]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    R. L. Workman et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022) 10.1093/ptep/ptac097

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Baryons and baryoniums in the pers pective of QCD sum rules,

    S. Q. Zhang and C. F. Qiao, “Baryons and baryoniums in the pers pective of QCD sum rules,” arXiv:2512.24706 [hep-ph]

  41. [49]

    QCD sum rule calculation for t he charmonium-like structures in the J/ψφ and J/ψω invariant mass spectra,

    S. I. Finazzo, M. Nielsen and X. Liu, “QCD sum rule calculation for t he charmonium-like structures in the J/ψφ and J/ψω invariant mass spectra,” Phys. Lett. B 701, 101–106 (2011) 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.05.042 [arXiv:1102.2347 [hep-ph]]

    2011 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Estimating the mass of the hidden charm 1+(1+) tetraquark state via QCD sum rules,

    C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, “Estimating the mass of the hidden charm 1+(1+) tetraquark state via QCD sum rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3122 (2014) 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3122-x [arXiv:1307.6654 [hep-ph]]

    2014 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Interpretation of Zc(4025) as the hidden charm tetraquark states via QCD Sum Rules,

    C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, “Interpretation of Zc(4025) as the hidden charm tetraquark states via QCD Sum Rules,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2810 (2014) 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2810-x [arXiv:1308.3439 [hep-ph]]. 22 Appendix: Spectral density for the current j1 For completeness, we presen...

    2014 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    for the current j1 defined in Eq. ( 2). This expression is given as a representa- tive example; the spectral densities for the other currents have analogous structures and are not displayed explicitly for brevity. The full spectral den sity is decomposed as ρOPE 1 (s) = ρpert 1...

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.