pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06246 · v1 · pith:RXBUN55Rnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · cs.IT· math-ph· math.FA· math.IT· math.MP· math.ST· stat.TH

Multiple Quantum Hypothesis Testing: One-Shot Pairwise Bounds and Sharp Asymptotics

Hao-Chung Cheng , Po-Chieh Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 01:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cs.ITmath-phmath.FAmath.ITmath.MPmath.STstat.TH
keywords quantum hypothesis testingmultiple statesone-shot boundsChernoff boundpairwise errorsdimension-free boundsasymptotic achievabilitybinary hypothesis testing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A dimension-free one-shot upper bound relates the minimum error probability in multiple quantum hypothesis testing to the sum of pairwise errors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves an upper bound on the error probability when distinguishing among several quantum states that depends only on the sum of the error probabilities from testing each pair of states. This bound holds without any factors that grow with the dimension of the underlying space. It resolves an open conjecture and strengthens earlier results on the multiple quantum Chernoff bound. In the limit of many copies of the states, the bound establishes that the optimal error rate is given by the multiple quantum Chernoff distance even for infinite-dimensional systems. For the binary case it further shows that the quantum minimum error is at most twice the classical minimum error computed from associated probability distributions.

Core claim

We establish a dimension-free one-shot upper bound on the minimum probability of error in terms of the sum of pairwise errors. This resolves a conjecture of Audenaert and Mosonyi and improves the multiple quantum Chernoff bound of Li by removing its dimension-dependent prefactor. In the asymptotic many-copy regime, our bound proves the achievability of the multiple quantum Chernoff distance for arbitrary separable Hilbert spaces, thereby settling the previously open infinite-dimensional case, and further yields constant-factor sharp asymptotics for the optimal error probability. In binary quantum hypothesis testing, we prove that the minimum error probability is characterized, up to universa

What carries the argument

The dimension-free one-shot upper bound relating the multi-state minimum error probability to the sum of pairwise binary error probabilities.

If this is right

  • The multiple quantum Chernoff bound holds without a dimension-dependent prefactor.
  • The multiple quantum Chernoff distance is achievable in arbitrary separable Hilbert spaces, including infinite dimensions.
  • Constant-factor sharp asymptotics hold for the optimal error probability in the many-copy regime.
  • The optimal binary quantum error probability is within a factor of two of the optimal classical error probability for the Nussbaum-Szkoła distributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests that designing good multi-state discrimination strategies can focus primarily on optimizing pairwise tests.
  • The results may extend to continuous-variable quantum systems where Hilbert spaces are infinite-dimensional.
  • The factor-of-two closeness between quantum and classical binary errors could motivate further comparisons with other classical-quantum relations.

Load-bearing premise

The minimum error probability for multiple states is controlled by the sum of pairwise binary error probabilities without additional dimension-dependent overhead.

What would settle it

A counterexample consisting of quantum states in some separable Hilbert space where the minimum multi-state error probability exceeds any fixed multiple of the sum of pairwise error probabilities would falsify the bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06246 by Hao-Chung Cheng, Po-Chieh Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the multiple quantum hypothesis testing. Err⋆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider Bayesian discrimination among multiple quantum states and establish a dimension-free one-shot upper bound on the minimum probability of error in terms of the sum of pairwise errors. This resolves a conjecture of Audenaert and Mosonyi [J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014)] and improves the multiple quantum Chernoff bound of Li [Ann. Statist. 44 (2016)] by removing its dimension-dependent prefactor. In the asymptotic many-copy regime, our bound proves the achievability of the multiple quantum Chernoff distance for arbitrary separable Hilbert spaces, thereby settling the previously open infinite-dimensional case, and further yields constant-factor sharp asymptotics for the optimal error probability. In binary quantum hypothesis testing, we prove that the minimum error probability is characterized, up to universal constants, by a trace harmonic-mean quantity. Consequently, the optimal binary quantum error probability is within a factor of two of the optimal classical error probability for the associated Nussbaum-Szko{\l}a distributions, complementing the lower bound of Nussbaum and Szko{\l}a [Ann. Statist. 37 (2009)].

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper establishes a dimension-free one-shot upper bound on the minimum probability of error for Bayesian discrimination among multiple quantum states, expressed in terms of the sum of pairwise binary error probabilities. This resolves the Audenaert-Mosonyi conjecture and improves the multiple quantum Chernoff bound by removing its dimension-dependent prefactor. In the asymptotic many-copy regime, the bound establishes achievability of the multiple quantum Chernoff distance for arbitrary separable Hilbert spaces (settling the infinite-dimensional case) and yields constant-factor sharp asymptotics. For binary hypothesis testing, the minimum error probability is characterized up to universal constants by a trace harmonic-mean quantity and lies within a factor of two of the classical error probability for the associated Nussbaum-Szkoła distributions.

Significance. If the results hold, the work is significant because it supplies explicit, dimension-free bounds that resolve a standing conjecture and extend the multiple Chernoff distance to infinite-dimensional spaces via approximation arguments that preserve the constants. The direct comparison between multi-hypothesis error and sums of binary errors, together with the trace-harmonic-mean characterization, removes the dimension-dependent overhead that limited prior bounds. These features, combined with the connection to classical Nussbaum-Szkoła distributions, strengthen the link between quantum and classical hypothesis testing and provide falsifiable predictions for the asymptotic regime.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (8)] §2.1, Eq. (8): the definition of the trace harmonic mean is introduced without an immediate comparison to the classical harmonic mean; adding one sentence would clarify the factor-of-two relation claimed later.
  2. [§4, Theorem 12] §4, Theorem 12: the statement of the infinite-dimensional achievability result refers to 'approximation arguments' without citing the specific lemma that controls the dimension-free constant; a forward reference would help.
  3. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the caption does not indicate whether the plotted curves correspond to the upper or lower bound; this affects readability of the sharp-asymptotics claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and detailed summary of our work, as well as for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments or criticisms were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are self-contained from standard quantities

full rationale

The paper establishes dimension-free bounds on multi-hypothesis error via direct comparisons to sums of pairwise binary errors and trace-harmonic-mean characterizations. These rely on explicit proofs and approximation arguments for infinite-dimensional cases, without reducing to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The resolution of the Audenaert-Mosonyi conjecture and improvement over Li's bound use independent mathematical arguments (pairwise error sums, Chernoff distances) that do not collapse to the target result by construction. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; ledger populated from standard background assumptions in quantum hypothesis testing. No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Quantum states are density operators on separable Hilbert spaces and measurements are POVMs.
    Invoked implicitly when defining error probabilities and Chernoff quantities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5747 in / 1206 out tokens · 37641 ms · 2026-06-28T01:23:29.512906+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Detection theory and quantum mechanics,

    C. W. Helstrom, “Detection theory and quantum mechanics,”Information and Control, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 254–291, mar 1967

    1967

  2. [2]

    The analogue of statistical decision theory in the noncommutative probability theory,

    A. S. Holevo, “The analogue of statistical decision theory in the noncommutative probability theory,”Proc. Moscow Math. Soc., vol. 26, pp. 133–149, 1972

    1972

  3. [3]

    Remarks on optimal quantum measurements,

    ——, “Remarks on optimal quantum measurements,”Problems Inform. Transmission, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 51–55, 1974. [Online]. Available: http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=ppi& paperid=1057&option lang=eng

    1974

  4. [4]

    Investigations in the general theory of statistical decisions,

    ——, “Investigations in the general theory of statistical decisions,” inProc. Steklov Inst. Math., no. 124, 1978, pp. 1–140

    1978

  5. [5]

    Optimum testing of multiple hypotheses in quantum detection theory,

    H. P. Yuen, R. S. Kennedy, and M. Lax, “Optimum testing of multiple hypotheses in quantum detection theory,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 21, pp. 125–134, March 1975

    1975

  6. [6]

    The proper formula for relative entropy and its asymptotics in quantum probability,

    F. Hiai and D. Petz, “The proper formula for relative entropy and its asymptotics in quantum probability,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 99–114, Dec 1991

    1991

  7. [7]

    Strong converse and Stein’s lemma in quantum hypothesis testing,

    T. Ogawa and H. Nagaoka, “Strong converse and Stein’s lemma in quantum hypothesis testing,”IEEE Trans- action on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2428–2433, 2000

    2000

  8. [8]

    K. R. Parthasarathy,On Consistency of the Maximum Likelihood Method in Testing Multiple Quantum Hy- potheses. Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2001, pp. 361–377

    2001

  9. [9]

    Attainment of the multiple quantum chernoff bound for certain ensembles of mixed states,

    M. Nussbaum, “Attainment of the multiple quantum chernoff bound for certain ensembles of mixed states,” in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Entangled Coherent States and Its Application to Quantum Information Science, T. S. Usuda and K. Kato, Eds. Tokyo, Japan: Tamagawa University, 2013, pp. 77–81

    2013

  10. [10]

    Pretty simple bounds on quantum state discrimination,

    A. Montanaro, “Pretty simple bounds on quantum state discrimination,” 2019

    2019

  11. [11]

    An asymptotic error bound for testing multiple quantum hypotheses,

    M. Nussbaum and A. Szko la, “An asymptotic error bound for testing multiple quantum hypotheses,”The Annals of Statistics, vol. 39, no. 6, December 2011

    2011

  12. [12]

    Exponential error rates in multiple state discrimination on a quantum spin chain,

    ——, “Exponential error rates in multiple state discrimination on a quantum spin chain,”Journal of Mathe- matical Physics, vol. 51, no. 7, July 2010

    2010

  13. [13]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp

    ——,Asymptotically Optimal Discrimination between Pure Quantum States. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 1–8. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18073-6 1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18073-6 2011

  14. [14]

    Upper bounds on the error probabilities and asymptotic error exponents in quantum multiple state discrimination,

    K. M. R. Audenaert and M. Mosonyi, “Upper bounds on the error probabilities and asymptotic error exponents in quantum multiple state discrimination,”Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 55, no. 10, p. 102201, oct 2014. 27

    2014

  15. [15]

    Discriminating quantum states: The multiple Chernoff distance,

    K. Li, “Discriminating quantum states: The multiple Chernoff distance,”The Annals of Statistics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1661 – 1679, 2016

    2016

  16. [16]

    Simple and tighter derivation of achievability for classical communication over quantum chan- nels,

    H.-C. Cheng, “Simple and tighter derivation of achievability for classical communication over quantum chan- nels,”PRX Quantum, vol. 4, no. 4, November 2023, arXiv:2208.02132 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Quantum multiple hypothesis testing based on a sequential discarding scheme,

    J. Perez-Guijarro, A. Pages-Zamora, and J. R. Fonollosa, “Quantum multiple hypothesis testing based on a sequential discarding scheme,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 13 813–13 826, 2022

    2022

  18. [18]

    Bounds in sequential unambiguous discrimination of multiple pure quantum states,

    J. P´ erez-Guijarro, A. Pag` es-Zamora, and J. R. Fonollosa, “Bounds in sequential unambiguous discrimination of multiple pure quantum states,”Quantum, vol. 9, p. 1919, 2025

    1919

  19. [19]

    An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing,

    H.-C. Cheng, N. Datta, N. Liu, T. Nuradha, R. Salzmann, and M. M. Wilde, “An invitation to the sample complexity of quantum hypothesis testing,”npj Quantum Information, vol. 11, no. 1, June 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations,

    H. Chernoff, “A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 493–507, dec 1952

    1952

  21. [21]

    Discriminating states: The quantum Chernoff bound,

    K. M. R. Audenaert, J. Calsamiglia, R. Mu˜ noz-Tapia, E. Bagan, L. Masanes, A. Acin, and F. Verstraete, “Discriminating states: The quantum Chernoff bound,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, p. 160501, Apr 2007

    2007

  22. [22]

    Asymptotic error rates in quantum hy- pothesis testing,

    K. M. R. Audenaert, M. Nussbaum, A. Szko la, and F. Verstraete, “Asymptotic error rates in quantum hy- pothesis testing,”Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 251–283, Feb 2008

    2008

  23. [23]

    Quantum hypothesis testing and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics,

    V. Jakˇ si´ c, Y. Ogata, C.-A. Pillet, and R. Seiringer, “Quantum hypothesis testing and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics,”Reviews in Mathematical Physics, vol. 24, no. 06, p. 1230002, jun 2012

    2012

  24. [24]

    Jakˇ si´ c, Y

    V. Jakˇ si´ c, Y. Ogata, Y. Pautrat, and C.-A. Pillet,Entropic fluctuations in quantum statistical mechanics—an introduction. Oxford University Press, May 2012, pp. 213–410

    2012

  25. [25]

    Hiai and D

    F. Hiai and D. Petz,Introduction to Matrix Analysis and Applications. Springer International Publishing, 2014

    2014

  26. [26]

    The Chernoff lower bound for symmetric quantum hypothesis testing,

    M. Nussbaum and A. Szko la, “The Chernoff lower bound for symmetric quantum hypothesis testing,”Annals of Statistics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1040–1057, Apr 2009

    2009

  27. [27]

    Query complexity of classical and quantum channel discrimination,

    T. Nuradha and M. M. Wilde, “Query complexity of classical and quantum channel discrimination,”Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 045075, October 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Correlation detection and an operational interpretation of the R´ enyi mutual information,

    M. Hayashi and M. Tomamichel, “Correlation detection and an operational interpretation of the R´ enyi mutual information,”Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 57, no. 10, p. 102201, Oct 2016

    2016

  29. [29]

    Generalized quantum Chernoff bound,

    K. Fang and M. Hayashi, “Generalized quantum Chernoff bound,” 2025

    2025

  30. [30]

    Error exponents of quantum state discrimination with composite correlated hypotheses,

    ——, “Error exponents of quantum state discrimination with composite correlated hypotheses,”IEEE Trans- actions on Information Theory, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 4140–4165, June 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    Amortized channel divergence for asymptotic quantum channel discrimination,

    M. M. Wilde, M. Berta, C. Hirche, and E. Kaur, “Amortized channel divergence for asymptotic quantum channel discrimination,”Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 2277–2336, June 2020

    2020

  32. [32]

    Quantum metrology in the finite-sample regime,

    J. J. Meyer, S. Khatri, D. Stilck Fran¸ ca, J. Eisert, and P. Faist, “Quantum metrology in the finite-sample regime,”PRX Quantum, vol. 6, no. 3, August 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Error exponent in asymmetric quantum hypothesis testing and its application to classical- quantum channel coding,

    M. Hayashi, “Error exponent in asymmetric quantum hypothesis testing and its application to classical- quantum channel coding,”Physical Review A, vol. 76, p. 062301, Dec 2007

    2007

  34. [34]

    Applications of position-based coding to classical communication over quantum channels,

    H. Qi, Q. Wang, and M. M. Wilde, “Applications of position-based coding to classical communication over quantum channels,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 51, no. 44, p. 444002, October 2018

    2018

  35. [35]

    Error Exponents for Quantum Packing Problems via An Operator Layer Cake Theorem

    H.-C. Cheng and P.-C. Liu, “Error exponents for quantum packing problems via an operator layer cake theorem,” 2025, arXiv:2507.06232 [quant-ph]. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Moderate deviation analysis for classical-quantum channels and quantum hypothesis testing,

    H.-C. Cheng and M.-H. Hsieh, “Moderate deviation analysis for classical-quantum channels and quantum hypothesis testing,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1385–1403, feb 2018

    2018

  37. [37]

    Moderate deviation analysis for classical communication over quantum channels,

    C. T. Chubb, V. Y. F. Tan, and M. Tomamichel, “Moderate deviation analysis for classical communication over quantum channels,”Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 355, no. 3, pp. 1283–1315, Nov 2017

    2017

  38. [38]

    Exponential analysis for entanglement distillation,

    Z. Lin, K. Li, and K. Fang, “Exponential analysis for entanglement distillation,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10190

    work page arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Strong converse for privacy amplification against quantum side infor- mation,

    Y.-C. Shen, L. Gao, and H.-C. Cheng, “Strong converse for privacy amplification against quantum side infor- mation,”arXiv:2202.10263 [quant-ph], 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Error exponent and strong converse for quantum soft covering,

    H.-C. Cheng and L. Gao, “Error exponent and strong converse for quantum soft covering,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 3499–3511, May 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    Tight one-shot analysis for convex splitting with applications in quantum information theory,

    ——, “Tight one-shot analysis for convex splitting with applications in quantum information theory,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 8573–8594, November 2025. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tit.2025.3612051 28

    work page doi:10.1109/tit.2025.3612051 2025

  42. [42]

    Joint state-channel decoupling and one-shot quantum coding theorem,

    H.-C. Cheng, F. Dupuis, and L. Gao, “Joint state-channel decoupling and one-shot quantum coding theorem,”

  43. [43]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15149

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15149

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Quantum ranging with Gaussian entanglement,

    Q. Zhuang, “Quantum ranging with Gaussian entanglement,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 126, no. 24, p. 240501, 2021

    2021

  45. [45]

    Joint communication and sensing with bipartite entanglement over bosonic channels,

    M.-C. Chang and M. R. Bloch, “Joint communication and sensing with bipartite entanglement over bosonic channels,” 2025

    2025

  46. [46]

    Quantumf-divergences via Nussbaum–Szko la distributions and applications tof-divergence inequalities,

    G. Androulakis and T. C. John, “Quantumf-divergences via Nussbaum–Szko la distributions and applications tof-divergence inequalities,”Reviews in Mathematical Physics, vol. 36, no. 09, September 2023

    2023

  47. [47]

    Quantumf-divergences via Nussbaum–Szko la distributions in semifinite von Neumann algebras,

    T. Anastasiadis and G. Androulakis, “Quantumf-divergences via Nussbaum–Szko la distributions in semifinite von Neumann algebras,” 2026

    2026

  48. [48]

    Quantum union bounds for sequential projective measurements,

    J. Gao, “Quantum union bounds for sequential projective measurements,”Physical Review A, vol. 92, p. 052331, Nov 2015

    2015

  49. [49]

    Union bound for quantum information processing,

    S. Khabbazi Oskouei, S. Mancini, and M. M. Wilde, “Union bound for quantum information processing,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 475, no. 2221, p. 20180612, 2019

    2019

  50. [50]

    The quantum union bound made easy,

    R. O’Donnell and R. Venkateswaran, “The quantum union bound made easy,” inSymposium on Simplicity in Algorithms (SOSA). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, jan 2022, pp. 314–320

    2022

  51. [51]

    On deviations of the sample mean,

    R. R. Bahadur and R. R. Rao, “On deviations of the sample mean,”The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1015–1027, Dec 1960

    1960

  52. [52]

    On the probabilities of large deviations for sums of independent random variables,

    V. V. Petrov, “On the probabilities of large deviations for sums of independent random variables,”Theory of Probability & Its Applications, vol. 10, pp. 287–298, 1965

    1965

  53. [53]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1975

    ——,Sums of Independent Random Variables. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1975

    1975

  54. [54]

    Dembo and O

    A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni,Large Deviations Techniques and Applications. Springer, 1998

    1998

  55. [55]

    Quasi-entropies for finite quantum systems,

    D. Petz, “Quasi-entropies for finite quantum systems,”Reports on Mathematical Physics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 57–65, Feb 1986

    1986

  56. [56]

    Arimoto-R´ enyi conditional entropy and BayesianM-ary hypothesis testing,

    I. Sason and S. Verdu, “Arimoto-R´ enyi conditional entropy and BayesianM-ary hypothesis testing,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 4–25, jan 2018

    2018

  57. [57]

    Means of positive linear operators,

    F. Kubo and T. Ando, “Means of positive linear operators,”Mathematische Annalen, vol. 246, no. 3, pp. 205–224, Oct 1980

    1980

  58. [58]

    Quasi-entropies for states of a von Neumann algebra,

    D. Petz, “Quasi-entropies for states of a von Neumann algebra,”Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., pp. 787–800, 1985

    1985

  59. [59]

    Monotone metrics on matrix spaces,

    ——, “Monotone metrics on matrix spaces,”Linear Algebra and its Applications, vol. 244, pp. 81–96, 1996

    1996

  60. [60]

    Monotone riemannian metrics and relative entropy on noncommutative probability spaces,

    A. Lesniewski and M. B. Ruskai, “Monotone riemannian metrics and relative entropy on noncommutative probability spaces,”Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 40, pp. 5702–5724, 1999

    1999

  61. [61]

    Quantumf-divergences and error correction,

    F. Hiai, M. Mosonyi, D. Petz, and C. B´ eny, “Quantumf-divergences and error correction,”Reviews in Math- ematical Physics, vol. 23, no. 07, pp. 691–747, Aug 2011

    2011

  62. [62]

    Quantumf-divergences in von Neumann algebras. i. standardf-divergences,

    F. Hiai, “Quantumf-divergences in von Neumann algebras. i. standardf-divergences,”Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics, vol. 59, no. 10, September 2018

    2018

  63. [63]

    Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras,

    H. Araki, “Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras,”Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 809–833, December 1975

    1975

  64. [64]

    Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras ii,

    ——, “Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras ii,”Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 173–192, 1977

    1977

  65. [65]

    C ∗-algebraic generalization of relative entropy and entropy,

    V. P. Belavkin and P. Staszewski, “C ∗-algebraic generalization of relative entropy and entropy,”Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 1982. [Online]. Available: http://eudml.org/doc/76163

    1982

  66. [66]

    Different quantumf-divergences and the reversibility of quantum operations,

    F. Hiai and M. Mosonyi, “Different quantumf-divergences and the reversibility of quantum operations,” Reviews in Mathematical Physics, vol. 29, no. 07, p. 1750023, August 2017

    2017

  67. [67]

    Matsumoto,A New Quantum Version off-Divergence

    K. Matsumoto,A New Quantum Version off-Divergence. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018, pp. 229–273

    2018

  68. [68]

    Quantumf-divergences in von Neumann algebras. ii. maximalf-divergences,

    F. Hiai, “Quantumf-divergences in von Neumann algebras. ii. maximalf-divergences,”Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics, vol. 60, no. 1, January 2019

    2019

  69. [69]

    Optimal multiple quantum statistical hypothesis testing,

    V. P. Belavkin, “Optimal multiple quantum statistical hypothesis testing,”Stochastics, vol. 1, no. 1-4, pp. 315–345, 1975

    1975

  70. [70]

    A ‘pretty good’ measurement for distinguishing quantum states,

    P. Hausladen and W. K. Wootters, “A ‘pretty good’ measurement for distinguishing quantum states,”Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2385–2390, dec 1994

    1994

  71. [71]

    Lower bounds on error exponents via a new quantum decoder,

    S. Beigi and M. Tomamichel, “Lower bounds on error exponents via a new quantum decoder,”IEEE Transac- tions on Information Theory, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 7882–7891, November 2024

    2024

  72. [72]

    Quantum R´ enyi andf-divergences from integral representations,

    C. Hirche and M. Tomamichel, “Quantum R´ enyi andf-divergences from integral representations,”Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics, vol. 405, no. 9, p. 208, 2024. 29

    2024

  73. [73]

    Some properties and applications of the new quantumf-divergences,

    S. Beigi, C. Hirche, and M. Tomamichel, “Some properties and applications of the new quantumf-divergences,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03799, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Layer cake representations for quantum divergences,

    P.-C. Liu, C. Hirche, and H.-C. Cheng, “Layer cake representations for quantum divergences,” 2025, arXiv:2507.07065. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07065

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Quantum state discrimination bounds for finite sample size,

    K. M. R. Audenaert, M. Mosonyi, and F. Verstraete, “Quantum state discrimination bounds for finite sample size,”Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 53, no. 12, December 2012

    2012

  76. [76]

    Tight relations and equivalences between smooth relative entropies,

    B. Regula, L. Lami, and N. Datta, “Tight relations and equivalences between smooth relative entropies,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 3051–3073, May 2026

    2026

  77. [77]

    Asymptotically optimal tests for multinomial distributions,

    W. Hoeffding, “Asymptotically optimal tests for multinomial distributions,”The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 369–401, apr 1965

    1965

  78. [78]

    A Hierarchy of Information Quantities for Finite Block Length Analysis of Quantum Tasks

    M. Tomamichel and M. Hayashi, “A Hierarchy of Information Quantities for Finite Block Length Analysis of Quantum Tasks,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 7693–7710, Nov. 2013, arXiv:1208.1478

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  79. [79]

    Second-order asymptotics for quantum hypothesis testing,

    K. Li, “Second-order asymptotics for quantum hypothesis testing,”The Annals of Statistics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 171–189, Feb 2014

    2014

  80. [80]

    A Converse Bound via the Nussbaum-Szko{\l}a Mapping for Quantum Hypothesis Testing

    J. Lizarribar-Carrillo, G. V’azquez-Vilar, and T. Koch, “A converse bound via the Nussbaum–Szko la mapping for quantum hypothesis testing,” 2026, arXiv:2601.13970 [quant-ph]. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13970

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.