pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09713 · v1 · pith:XU7EBXAHnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.IM· gr-qc

PTA-Compatible Domain Walls at LISA and Taiji: Bayesian Reconstruction and Multiband Inference

Satyabrata Datta , Rome Samanta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.IMgr-qc
keywords domain wallsgravitational wavesPTALISATaijiBayesian inferenceultraviolet tailmultiband analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Domain walls fitting PTA data produce an ultraviolet gravitational wave tail that LISA and Taiji can reach in the milli-Hz band.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the region of domain-wall parameter space that is compatible with current PTA signals and shows that the associated gravitational wave spectrum has an ultraviolet tail extending into the frequency band of space-based interferometers. It performs a 10-dimensional Bayesian analysis that includes two domain-wall parameters plus eight nuisance parameters for noise and foregrounds, using both LISA-only and Taiji-only injections as well as joint PTA-informed runs. The results indicate that an extended portion of this space remains detectable even after foreground subtraction, yet the genuinely constraining part of the PTA-supported region lies only at its high-signal boundary. In that boundary region the space-based data supply a measurable posterior update and largely remove the strong degeneracy seen in single-detector analyses.

Core claim

Domain-wall models that reproduce the PTA signal possess a gravitational-wave spectrum whose ultraviolet tail reaches the milli-Hz band; LISA and Taiji therefore have access to an extended slice of the PTA-compatible parameter space, while joint PTA-LISA and PTA-Taiji analyses yield additional information gain that is localized to the high-signal edge and that suppresses the degeneracies present in space-based-only inference.

What carries the argument

Ten-dimensional Bayesian inference on two domain-wall signal parameters together with eight instrumental and foreground nuisance parameters, performed on 49 grid injections for single-detector runs and 65 PTA-supported injections for joint runs, with Clough-Tocher interpolation to build posterior heat maps.

If this is right

  • LISA and Taiji can probe an extended region of PTA-compatible domain-wall parameter space even after astrophysical foregrounds are subtracted.
  • Within the PTA-supported slice the informative regime is confined to the high-signal boundary.
  • Space-based-only posteriors remain strongly degenerate in the two signal parameters except where the signal is strong enough to allow one principal combination to be recovered precisely.
  • PTA-informed priors produce a non-negligible posterior shift and largely eliminate the LISA/Taiji-only degeneracy, but the final posterior axis ratio often stays comparable to the PTA-only case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the high-signal edge is eventually detected, multiband data would allow the domain-wall tension and formation epoch to be cross-checked between nano-Hz and milli-Hz bands.
  • The restricted informative region implies that sensitivity improvements in LISA and Taiji would be needed to access most of the PTA-compatible space.
  • The same multiband Bayesian machinery could be applied to other PTA sources whose spectra also possess high-frequency tails.

Load-bearing premise

The precise shape and amplitude of the ultraviolet tail in the domain-wall gravitational-wave spectrum are assumed to be known and to be the correct description of whatever is producing the PTA signal.

What would settle it

A null result at the high-signal edge of the PTA-compatible domain-wall region in actual LISA or Taiji data, or a reconstructed posterior that fails to overlap the PTA-supported region once the space-based likelihood is included.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09713 by Rome Samanta, Satyabrata Datta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Upper panel: Left, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Same as the lower panel of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Reconstructed signals at LISA. Upper panel: benchmark signals lying within the PTA-supported [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Corner plot for BP1, marked in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Corner plot for BP2, marked in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Corner plot for BP3, marked in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Joint PTA–LISA analysis. Left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Joint posterior comparison for the three benchmark points shown in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. 10-dimensional corner plot for BP2, shown in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. 10-dimensional corner plot for the LISA-only reconstruction using the same signal-parameter values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Domain walls provide an excellent fit to Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) data. A distinctive feature of the associated gravitational-wave (GW) spectrum is its ultraviolet (UV) tail, which can extend into the mHz band and thereby make cross-detection with space-based interferometers such as LISA and Taiji possible. In this work, we explore the PTA-compatible parameter space of domain-wall models and study both the reconstruction prospects at LISA and Taiji and the information gain achievable through joint PTA--LISA and PTA--Taiji analyses. We find that LISA and Taiji can probe an extended region of parameter space yielding an ultraviolet tail in the milli-Hz band, even in the presence of astrophysical foregrounds. Within the PTA-supported region, however, the genuinely informative regime is more restricted and concentrated toward the high-signal edge. In the space-based-detector-only analysis, the posterior is strongly degenerate in the underlying model parameters, although one principal parameter combination can be reconstructed with high precision where the signal is sufficiently strong. When PTA-informed priors are incorporated, the additional information gain is localized to the same high-signal region: there the space-based data produce a non-negligible posterior update and strongly suppress the catastrophic LISA(Taiji)-only degeneracy, while the final posterior often retains an axis ratio comparable to that of PTA alone. Our analysis is based on a 10-dimensional Bayesian inference with two domain-wall signal parameters and eight nuisance parameters describing instrumental noise and astrophysical foregrounds. We use 49 grid injections for the LISA-only and Taiji-only analyses and 65 injections from the PTA-supported region for the joint analyses, with Clough--Tocher interpolation used to construct posterior heat maps.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a 10-dimensional Bayesian analysis exploring PTA-compatible domain-wall gravitational-wave signals, their ultraviolet tail into the milli-Hz band, and reconstruction prospects at LISA and Taiji (including joint PTA--LISA/Taiji analyses with astrophysical foregrounds). Using 49 grid injections for single-detector cases and 65 from the PTA-supported region for joint cases, with Clough--Tocher interpolation to map posteriors, the central claims are that space-based detectors can access an extended parameter space even with foregrounds, but the genuinely informative regime is restricted to the high-signal edge where joint analyses suppress degeneracies while retaining axis ratios comparable to PTA-only posteriors.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a concrete multiband framework for domain-wall models, explicitly demonstrating localized information gain from PTA-informed priors and the use of grid injections plus interpolation to handle high-dimensional degeneracies. The explicit separation of space-based-only versus joint posteriors and the focus on principal parameter combinations are strengths that allow falsifiable projections.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (Bayesian pipeline)] Methods section (Bayesian pipeline description): the domain-wall GW spectrum (including the precise shape and amplitude of its UV tail) is adopted as a fixed template that exactly matches the PTA signal. No variations in network evolution, annihilation efficiency, or scaling assumptions are reported; this assumption is load-bearing for the definition of the PTA-supported region explored by the 65 grid injections and for the claimed LISA/Taiji reach.
  2. [Results (joint analyses)] Results (joint-analysis posteriors): the claim that PTA-informed priors produce a non-negligible update and strongly suppress the LISA/Taiji-only degeneracy is tied directly to the fixed UV-tail template. A concrete robustness test (varying the template parameters while keeping the same 10D setup) is required to confirm that the reported posterior compression is not an artifact of the template choice.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify whether the 49/65 grid points are dense enough to support reliable Clough--Tocher interpolation across the full 10D space (two signal + eight nuisance parameters) without introducing artifacts in the high-signal edge.
  2. The abstract states that one principal parameter combination is reconstructed with high precision; define this combination explicitly (e.g., via the eigenvector or linear combination) in the text or a table.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below, clarifying the scope of our fixed-template analysis while acknowledging its limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Methods section (Bayesian pipeline description): the domain-wall GW spectrum (including the precise shape and amplitude of its UV tail) is adopted as a fixed template that exactly matches the PTA signal. No variations in network evolution, annihilation efficiency, or scaling assumptions are reported; this assumption is load-bearing for the definition of the PTA-supported region explored by the 65 grid injections and for the claimed LISA/Taiji reach.

    Authors: We agree that the GW spectrum is implemented as a fixed template calibrated to reproduce the PTA signal. This modeling choice is deliberate: the work is restricted to the PTA-compatible domain-wall parameter space and its ultraviolet extension into the milli-Hz band. Variations in network evolution, annihilation efficiency, or scaling relations would define distinct signal models and lie outside the present scope. We have revised the Methods section to state this assumption explicitly and to note its role in defining the PTA-supported region sampled by the 65 injections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results (joint-analysis posteriors): the claim that PTA-informed priors produce a non-negligible update and strongly suppress the LISA/Taiji-only degeneracy is tied directly to the fixed UV-tail template. A concrete robustness test (varying the template parameters while keeping the same 10D setup) is required to confirm that the reported posterior compression is not an artifact of the template choice.

    Authors: The reported posterior compression and information gain from PTA priors are demonstrated under the fixed UV-tail template that defines the PTA-supported region throughout the paper. A dedicated robustness test that varies the template parameters inside the identical 10D setup would require a new suite of grid injections and interpolations; such an extension is beyond the computational resources allocated to this study. The present results therefore remain conditional on the standard PTA-calibrated template adopted in the analysis. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A concrete robustness test varying the UV-tail template parameters while retaining the full 10D Bayesian setup with grid injections and Clough-Tocher interpolation

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent likelihoods and fixed external template

full rationale

The paper adopts a fixed domain-wall GW spectrum template stated to fit PTA data and performs 10D Bayesian inference on LISA/Taiji data (with 8 nuisance parameters) using grid injections and Clough-Tocher interpolation. PTA-supported regions supply priors for joint runs, but the space-based likelihood remains separate and no equation reduces any reported posterior, degeneracy suppression, or information gain to a fitted quantity defined from the same data by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the text; the central claims rest on standard numerical marginalization under an external model assumption rather than self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard cosmological production mechanism for gravitational waves from domain walls and on conventional Bayesian inference assumptions for stochastic backgrounds; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • domain-wall signal parameters
    Two parameters that set the amplitude and frequency scale of the domain-wall spectrum; these are varied in the 10D inference.
  • nuisance parameters
    Eight parameters describing instrumental noise and astrophysical foregrounds; fitted jointly with the signal parameters.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Domain-wall gravitational-wave spectrum possesses an ultraviolet tail that can reach the milliHertz band for PTA-compatible parameters
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the basis for LISA/Taiji reach.
  • standard math Standard likelihood and prior forms for stochastic gravitational-wave background searches
    Underlying the 10D Bayesian inference.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5859 in / 1481 out tokens · 22254 ms · 2026-06-27T15:58:58.191698+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Back- ground from Advanced LIGO’s First Observing Run, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 121101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 029901 (2017)], arXiv:1612.02029 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Agazieet al.(International Pulsar Timing Array), Comparing recent PTA results on the nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background, (2023), arXiv:2309.00693 [astro-ph.HE]

    G. Agazieet al.(International Pulsar Timing Array), Comparing recent PTA results on the nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background, (2023), arXiv:2309.00693 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2050075 (2020), arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Z. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Wu, W. Hu, and G. Jin, The Taiji program: A concise overview, PTEP2021, 05A108 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Sathyaprakashet al., Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope, Class

    B. Sathyaprakashet al., Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 124013 (2012), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 079501 (2013)], arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Kawamuraet al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO, Class

    S. Kawamuraet al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.23, S125 (2006)

    2006

  10. [10]

    S. Chenet al.(EPTA), Common-red-signal analysis with 24-yr high-precision timing of the European Pulsar Timing Array: inferences in the stochastic gravitational-wave background search, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508, 4970 (2021), arXiv:2110.13184 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Arzoumanianet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

    Z. Arzoumanianet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.905, L34 (2020), arXiv:2009.04496 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res

    H. Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, Cosmological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67, 3 (1974). 33

    1974

  18. [18]

    W. H. Press, B. S. Ryden, and D. N. Spergel, Dynamical Evolution of Domain Walls in an Expanding Universe, Astrophys. J.347, 590 (1989)

    1989

  19. [19]

    Saikawa, A review of gravitational waves from cosmic domain walls, Universe3, 40 (2017), arXiv:1703.02576 [hep-ph]

    K. Saikawa, A review of gravitational waves from cosmic domain walls, Universe3, 40 (2017), arXiv:1703.02576 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    M. R. Adams and N. J. Cornish, Detecting a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background in the presence of a Galactic Foreground and Instrument Noise, Phys. Rev. D89, 022001 (2014), arXiv:1307.4116 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Boileau, N

    G. Boileau, N. Christensen, R. Meyer, and N. J. Cornish, Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for LISA: Observing both cosmological and astrophysical backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D103, 103529 (2021), arXiv:2011.05055 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Boileau, A

    G. Boileau, A. Lamberts, N. Christensen, N. J. Cornish, and R. Meyer, Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for LISA in the context of a modulated Galactic foreground, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508, 803 (2021), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 508, 5554–5555 (2021)], arXiv:2105.04283 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Korol, N

    V. Korol, N. Hallakoun, S. Toonen, and N. Karnesis, Observationally driven Galactic double white dwarf population for LISA, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.511, 5936 (2022), arXiv:2109.10972 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Korolet al., Populations of double white dwarfs in Milky Way satellites and their detectability with LISA, Astron

    V. Korolet al., Populations of double white dwarfs in Milky Way satellites and their detectability with LISA, Astron. Astrophys.638, A153 (2020), arXiv:2002.10462 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Liu, W.-H

    C. Liu, W.-H. Ruan, and Z.-K. Guo, Confusion noise from Galactic binaries for Taiji, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064021 (2023), arXiv:2301.02821 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    E. S. Phinney, A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds, (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  27. [27]

    Regimbau, The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background, Res

    T. Regimbau, The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background, Res. Astron. Astrophys.11, 369 (2011), arXiv:1101.2762 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Babak, C

    S. Babak, C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, N. Karnesis, P. Marcoccia, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciar- done, A. Sesana, and J. Torrado, Stochastic gravitational wave background from stellar origin binary black holes in LISA, JCAP08, 034, arXiv:2304.06368 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    Lehoucq, I

    L. Lehoucq, I. Dvorkin, R. Srinivasan, C. Pellouin, and A. Lamberts, Astrophysical uncertainties in the gravitational-wave background from stellar-mass compact binary mergers, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526, 4378 (2023), arXiv:2306.09861 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    D. T. Lee and B. J. Schachter, Two algorithms for constructing a delaunay triangulation, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences9, 219 (1980)

    1980

  31. [31]

    R. J. Renka and A. K. Cline, A triangle-basedc 1 interpolation method, Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics14, 223 (1984)

    1984

  32. [32]

    Nielson, A method for interpolating scattered data based upon a minimum norm network, Mathe- matics of Computation40, 253 (1983)

    G. Nielson, A method for interpolating scattered data based upon a minimum norm network, Mathe- matics of Computation40, 253 (1983)

    1983

  33. [33]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls, JCAP02, 031, arXiv:1309.5001 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Dankovsky, E

    I. Dankovsky, E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, and A. Vikman, Revisiting evolution of domain walls and their gravitational radiation with CosmoLattice, JCAP09, 047, arXiv:2406.17053 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    Babichev, I

    E. Babichev, I. Dankovsky, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, and A. Vikman, Biased domain walls: faster annihilation, weaker gravitational waves, JCAP10, 103, arXiv:2504.07902 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Notari, F

    A. Notari, F. Rompineve, and F. Torrenti, The spectrum of gravitational waves from annihilating domain walls, JCAP07, 049, arXiv:2504.03636 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    B. Cyr, S. Cotterill, and R. Battye, Near-peak spectrum of gravitational waves from collapsing domain walls, Phys. Rev. D113, 043549 (2026), arXiv:2504.02076 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Tinto and S

    M. Tinto and S. V. Dhurandhar, TIME DELAY, Living Rev. Rel.8, 4 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0409034

    arXiv 2005

  39. [39]

    McNamara, S

    P. McNamara, S. Vitale, and K. Danzmann (LISA), LISA Pathfinder, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 114034 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    Armanoet al., Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20µHz, Phys

    M. Armanoet al., Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20µHz, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 061101 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    Caprini, D

    C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, R. Flauger, G. Nardini, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and G. Tasinato, Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA, JCAP11, 017, arXiv:1906.09244 [astro-ph.CO]. 34

    arXiv 1906

  42. [42]

    Flauger, N

    R. Flauger, N. Karnesis, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and J. Torrado, Improved recon- struction of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA, JCAP01, 059, arXiv:2009.11845 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Jinno, M. Lewicki, E. Madge, M. Merchand, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Roper Pol, and V. Vaskonen (LISA Cosmology Working Group), Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation, JCAP10, 020, arXiv:2403.03723 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    N. J. Cornish, Detecting a stochastic gravitational wave background with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Phys. Rev. D65, 022004 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0106058

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    T. L. Smith and R. Caldwell, LISA for Cosmologists: Calculating the Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Stochas- tic and Deterministic Sources, Phys. Rev. D100, 104055 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 029902 (2022)], arXiv:1908.00546 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Babak, A

    S. Babak, A. Petiteau, and M. Hewitson, LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations, (2021), arXiv:2108.01167 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Chen, Q.-G

    Z.-C. Chen, Q.-G. Huang, C. Liu, L. Liu, X.-J. Liu, Y. Wu, Y.-M. Wu, Z. Yi, and Z.-Q. You, Prospects for Taiji to detect a gravitational-wave background from cosmic strings, JCAP03, 022, arXiv:2310.00411 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    Giampieri and A

    G. Giampieri and A. G. Polnarev, Detecting an anisotropic gravitational wave background with LISA, Class. Quant. Grav.14, 1521 (1997)

    1997

  49. [49]

    A. W. Criswell, S. Rieck, and V. Mandic, Templated anisotropic analyses of the LISA Galactic fore- ground, Phys. Rev. D111, 023025 (2025), arXiv:2410.23260 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    M. C. Digman and N. J. Cornish, LISA Gravitational Wave Sources in a Time-varying Galactic Stochas- tic Background, Astrophys. J.940, 10 (2022), arXiv:2206.14813 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Hindmarsh, D

    M. Hindmarsh, D. C. Hooper, T. Minkkinen, and D. J. Weir, Recovering a phase transition signal in simulated LISA data with a modulated galactic foreground, JCAP04, 052, arXiv:2406.04894 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    Buscicchio, A

    R. Buscicchio, A. Klein, V. Korol, F. Di Renzo, C. J. Moore, D. Gerosa, and A. Carzaniga, Test for LISA foreground Gaussianity and stationarity: galactic white-dwarf binaries, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 887 (2025), arXiv:2410.08263 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp

    R. Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp. Phys.49, 71 (2008), arXiv:0803.4089 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    2019, Publ

    E. Thrane and C. Talbot, An introduction to bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: Pa- rameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia36, 10.1017/pasa.2019.2 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.2 2019

  55. [55]

    R. E. Kass and A. E. Raftery, Bayes Factors, J. Am. Statist. Assoc.90, 773 (1995)

    1995

  56. [56]

    Pieroni and E

    M. Pieroni and E. Barausse, Foreground cleaning and template-free stochastic background extraction for LISA, JCAP07, 021, [Erratum: JCAP 09, E01 (2020)], arXiv:2004.01135 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Guan, H.-K

    S. Guan, H.-K. Guo, D. Jiao, Q. Liang, L. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Measuring gravitational wave spec- trum from electroweak phase transition and Higgs self-couplings, Phys. Rev. D113, 075014 (2026), arXiv:2511.00996 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Samanta, Probing leptogenesis at LISA: a Fisher analysis, JCAP08, 095, arXiv:2503.09884 [hep-ph]

    R. Samanta, Probing leptogenesis at LISA: a Fisher analysis, JCAP08, 095, arXiv:2503.09884 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  59. [59]

    J. S. Speagle, dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating bayesian posteriors and evidences, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society493, 3132 (2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    Ashtonet al., BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys

    G. Ashtonet al., BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl.241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    I. Jolliffe, Principal component analysis, inWiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06472

    work page doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat06472 2014

  62. [62]

    Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys

    M. Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys. Rev. D77, 042001 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0703086

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  63. [63]

    Mitridate, D

    A. Mitridate, D. Wright, R. von Eckardstein, T. Schr¨ oder, J. Nay, K. Olum, K. Schmitz, and T. Trickle, PTArcade (2023), arXiv:2306.16377 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Kullback and R

    S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, On Information and Sufficiency, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22, 79 (1951)

    1951

  65. [65]

    Babichev, D

    E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, R. Samanta, and A. Vikman, NANOGrav spectral index γ=3 from melting domain walls, Phys. Rev. D108, 123529 (2023), arXiv:2307.04582 [hep-ph]. 35

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Dankovsky, S

    I. Dankovsky, S. Ramazanov, E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, and A. Vikman, Numerical analysis of melting domain walls and their gravitational waves, JCAP02, 064, arXiv:2410.21971 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  67. [67]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 221103 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  68. [68]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Seto, Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries, Phys. Rev. D83, 044011 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 109901 (2017)], arXiv:1101.3940 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011