pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.00996 · v4 · pith:T6RJP64Fnew · submitted 2025-11-02 · ✦ hep-ph

Measuring gravitational wave spectrum from electroweak phase transition and Higgs self-couplings

Shuo Guan , Huai-Ke Guo , Dian Jiao , Qingyuan Liang , Lei Wu , Yang Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 19:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords gravitational waveselectroweak phase transitionHiggs self-couplingsstochastic backgroundparameter inferencesinglet extensionTaiji mission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational wave observations from space detectors can constrain the Higgs cubic and quartic self-couplings via the spectrum of a first-order electroweak phase transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how simulated data from a space-based gravitational wave mission can be processed to reconstruct the stochastic background generated by bubble nucleation and collisions during a first-order electroweak phase transition. From the reconstructed spectrum the authors extract the macroscopic parameters that describe the transition, then map those parameters onto the cubic and quartic terms in the Higgs potential inside a singlet-extended Standard Model. A sympathetic reader would care because this route offers an independent way to test extensions of the Standard Model that might explain the cosmic matter asymmetry, using signals that future detectors are expected to deliver.

Core claim

Using frequency-domain simulations of the Taiji mission that include instrumental noise and astrophysical foregrounds, the authors carry out parameter inference with both the Fisher information matrix and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. They demonstrate that the resulting constraints on the macroscopic phase-transition parameters can be translated into limits on the Higgs cubic and quartic self-couplings in the singlet-extended model, even though parameter degeneracies remain.

What carries the argument

The inference pipeline that fits a gravitational-wave spectrum template to simulated detector data and then maps the fitted macroscopic parameters (transition strength, duration, and temperature) onto the Higgs potential parameters of the singlet-extended Standard Model.

If this is right

  • The macroscopic parameters of the phase transition can be reconstructed from the observed spectrum.
  • Those parameters translate into quantitative limits on the Higgs cubic and quartic self-couplings.
  • Useful constraints on the self-couplings remain possible despite the presence of parameter degeneracies.
  • The method supplies a new observable for testing singlet extensions that can produce a strong first-order transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inference approach could be applied to data from other proposed space-based interferometers to test robustness against different noise levels.
  • If the true model contains additional scalars or different transition dynamics, the inferred self-coupling bounds would require re-derivation but the overall strategy would still apply.
  • Combining gravitational-wave limits with direct collider measurements of the same couplings could break the degeneracies that remain in the gravitational-wave-only analysis.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping from the observed gravitational-wave spectrum to specific values of the Higgs self-couplings assumes that the underlying theory is precisely the singlet-extended Standard Model with a first-order transition whose bubble dynamics produce the spectrum in the way the authors model.

What would settle it

A measured gravitational-wave spectrum whose shape or amplitude cannot be reproduced by any combination of phase-transition parameters that is consistent with the singlet-extended model, or a collider measurement of the Higgs self-couplings that lies outside the range allowed by the gravitational-wave constraints.

read the original abstract

In this work, we demonstrate the complete process of using space-based gravitational wave detectors to measure properties of the stochastic gravitational wave background arising from a first-order electroweak phase transition. Based on frequency-domain simulations of the Taiji mission, including instrumental noise and astrophysical foregrounds, we perform parameter inference using both the Fisher information matrix and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. We show how the reconstructed spectrum constrains the macroscopic parameters of the phase transition, and further how these constraints map onto the underlying particle-physics parameters in a singlet-extended Standard Model. Our results demonstrate that the Higgs cubic and quartic self-couplings can be significantly constrained using gravitational wave observations, despite limitations arising from parameter degeneracy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript outlines a pipeline for simulating the stochastic gravitational wave background from a first-order electroweak phase transition as observed by the Taiji mission. Frequency-domain simulations incorporate instrumental noise and astrophysical foregrounds; Fisher-matrix and MCMC analyses are used to infer macroscopic phase-transition parameters (e.g., α and β/H). These constraints are subsequently mapped onto the Higgs cubic and quartic self-couplings within a singlet-extended Standard Model, with the claim that meaningful limits can be obtained despite parameter degeneracies.

Significance. If the central mapping step is robust, the work supplies a concrete end-to-end demonstration that future space-based GW observations can constrain Higgs self-interactions, thereby linking cosmological signals to BSM scalar potentials. The inclusion of realistic noise/foreground modeling and the dual use of Fisher and Bayesian methods are positive features that increase applicability to actual data.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5] §5 (Mapping from macroscopic PT parameters to Higgs self-couplings): the translation assumes a fixed singlet-extended SM in which singlet mass, portal coupling, and wall velocity are held fixed or derived from a reduced subspace. Because α and β/H depend on the full set of potential parameters, the reported intervals on the cubic and quartic couplings are conditional; the manuscript does not quantify how these intervals shift when the additional parameters are varied.
  2. [Results section and abstract] Results section and abstract: the claim that the self-couplings 'can be significantly constrained' is not accompanied by explicit posterior widths, Fisher uncertainties, or degeneracy diagnostics on the mapped parameters. Without these quantitative error budgets, it is difficult to assess whether the constraints remain informative once the full model dependence is included.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly label the separate contributions of the PT signal, instrumental noise, and astrophysical foregrounds for each frequency bin.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the phase-transition parameters (α, β/H, v_w) should be defined once in a dedicated table or subsection and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. Revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation of the mapping procedure and the quantitative error budgets.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5] §5 (Mapping from macroscopic PT parameters to Higgs self-couplings): the translation assumes a fixed singlet-extended SM in which singlet mass, portal coupling, and wall velocity are held fixed or derived from a reduced subspace. Because α and β/H depend on the full set of potential parameters, the reported intervals on the cubic and quartic couplings are conditional; the manuscript does not quantify how these intervals shift when the additional parameters are varied.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the mapping is performed within a reduced parameter space where the singlet mass and portal coupling are fixed to benchmark values that realize a strong first-order phase transition, with wall velocity derived from the macroscopic parameters. This choice isolates the dependence on the Higgs self-couplings. To address the concern about conditional intervals, the revised manuscript now includes a systematic scan over a grid of singlet masses and portal couplings consistent with viable phase transitions. The shifts in the derived constraints on the cubic and quartic couplings are quantified, and a new discussion with additional figures has been added to §5 showing that the overall constraining power remains robust despite the variations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section and abstract] Results section and abstract: the claim that the self-couplings 'can be significantly constrained' is not accompanied by explicit posterior widths, Fisher uncertainties, or degeneracy diagnostics on the mapped parameters. Without these quantitative error budgets, it is difficult to assess whether the constraints remain informative once the full model dependence is included.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative measures improve clarity. The original figures already display the posterior distributions and Fisher ellipses, but the revised manuscript now adds a dedicated table in the Results section reporting the 68% credible intervals from MCMC and the 1σ Fisher uncertainties for the cubic and quartic self-couplings. A correlation matrix is also included to diagnose degeneracies. The abstract has been updated to reference these quantitative bounds, enabling readers to evaluate the informativeness of the constraints under the model assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard inference on simulated data with explicit model mapping.

full rationale

The paper performs forward modeling of the GW spectrum from macroscopic PT parameters (α, β/H) in a fixed singlet-extended SM, then applies Fisher-matrix and MCMC inference to recover those parameters from simulated Taiji data including noise and foregrounds. The subsequent mapping from recovered macroscopic parameters back to Higgs cubic and quartic self-couplings is performed inside the same model by varying the potential parameters while holding others fixed or derived consistently; this is an explicit, non-closed computational step rather than a self-definition or a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. No self-citation is used to justify uniqueness or to smuggle an ansatz, and the central results remain falsifiable against external benchmarks or alternative UV completions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard cosmological assumptions about first-order phase transitions and detector noise models, plus the specific particle-physics model chosen for the mapping; no new free parameters are introduced beyond those inferred from the simulated data.

free parameters (1)
  • Phase transition parameters (e.g., alpha, beta/H)
    These are recovered via Fisher and MCMC inference from the simulated gravitational wave spectrum.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The electroweak phase transition is first-order and produces a stochastic gravitational wave background whose spectrum is determined by the macroscopic parameters in the manner assumed.
    Invoked to connect the simulated detector data to the underlying Higgs self-couplings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5657 in / 1438 out tokens · 47303 ms · 2026-05-21T19:08:10.260972+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bayesian analysis of the complex singlet model with phase transition gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bayesian forecasts for the Taiji detector constrain complex singlet model parameters through electroweak phase transition gravitational wave signals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Caldwell et al.,Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics,Gen

    R. Caldwell et al.,Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics,Gen. Rel. Grav.54(2022) 156 [2203.07972]

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    LiGong, P

    B. LiGong, P. Shi and S.-J. Wang,Gravitational waves originated from the early universe: A review and perspective,Sci. Sin. Phys. Mech. Astro.55(2025) 230405

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    NANOGRAVcollaboration,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L8 [2306.16213]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    NANOGRAVcollaboration,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L9 [2306.16217]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    The dataset and timing analysis,Astron

    EPTA collaboration,The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis,Astron. Astrophys.678(2023) A48 [2306.16224]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Athron, A

    P. Athron, A. Fowlie, C.-T. Lu, L. Morris, L. Wu, Y . Wu et al.,Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 221001 [2306.17239]. – 31 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGOcollaboration,All-sky search for long-duration gravitational wave transients in the first Advanced LIGO observing run,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 065009 [1711.06843]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Kumar and T

    P. Kumar and T. Dent,Optimized search for a binary black hole merger population in LIGO-Virgo O3 data,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 043036 [2403.10439]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    KAGRA collaboration,Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, PTEP2021(2021) 05A101 [2005.05574]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    LIGO SCIENTIFIC, VIRGO, KAGRA collaboration,Upper Limits on the Isotropic Gravitational-Wave Background from the first part of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA’s fourth Observing Run,2508.20721

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    LISA collaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves

    T. Robson, N.J. Cornish and C. Liu,The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves, Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 105011 [1803.01944]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Rel.26(2023) 5 [2204.05434]

    LISA COSMOLOGYWORKINGGROUPcollaboration,Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,Living Rev. Rel.26(2023) 5 [2204.05434]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Hu and Y .-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y .-L. Wu,The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,Natl. Sci. Rev.4(2017) 685

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and Y .-Z. Zhang,Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35(2020) 2050075 [1807.09495]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Hyperunified field theory and Taiji program in space for GWD

    Y .-L. Wu,Hyperunified field theory and Taiji program in space for GWD,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33(2018) 1844014 [1805.10119]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    TIANQINcollaboration,TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 035010 [1512.02076]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    TIANQINcollaboration,The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology, PTEP2021(2021) 05A107 [2008.10332]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Luo et al.,The first round result from the TianQin-1 satellite,Class

    J. Luo et al.,The first round result from the TianQin-1 satellite,Class. Quant. Grav.37 (2020) 185013 [2008.09534]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP04(2016) 001 [1512.06239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Weir,Gravitational waves from a first order electroweak phase transition: a brief review,Phil

    D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from a first order electroweak phase transition: a brief review,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376(2018) 20170126 [1705.01783]

    work page arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures,

    A. Mazumdar and G. White,Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures,Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019) 076901 [1811.01948]

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Bian et al.,The Gravitational-wave physics II: Progress,Sci

    L. Bian et al.,The Gravitational-wave physics II: Progress,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64(2021) 120401 [2106.10235]. – 32 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,

    P. Athron, C. Bal ´azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135 (2024) 104094 [2305.02357]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Electroweak baryogenesis

    D.E. Morrissey and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Electroweak baryogenesis,New J. Phys.14 (2012) 125003 [1206.2942]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Boileau, N

    G. Boileau, N. Christensen, R. Meyer and N.J. Cornish,Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for LISA: Observing both cosmological and astrophysical backgrounds,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 103529 [2011.05055]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Boileau, A

    G. Boileau, A. Lamberts, N.J. Cornish and R. Meyer,Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for LISA in the context of a modulated Galactic foreground,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508(2021) 803 [2105.04283]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities

    B. Allen and J.D. Romano,Detecting a stochastic background of gravitational radiation: Signal processing strategies and sensitivities,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 102001 [gr-qc/9710117]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  30. [30]

    Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment

    J.D. Romano and N.J. Cornish,Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment,Living Rev. Rel.20(2017) 2 [1608.06889]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    W.-H. Ruan, C. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, Y .-L. Wu and R.-G. Cai,The LISA-Taiji network, 2020. 10.1038/s41550-019-1008-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-1008-4 2020

  32. [32]

    Cai, Z.-K

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, B. Hu, C. Liu, Y . Lu, W.-T. Ni et al.,On networks of space-based gravitational-wave detectors,Fund. Res.4(2024) 1072 [2305.04551]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    J. Chen, C. Liu, Y .-L. Zhang and G. Wang,Alternative LISA-TAIJI networks: Detectability of parity violation in stochastic gravitational wave background,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 084026 [2412.18420]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Tinto and S.V

    M. Tinto and S.V . Dhurandhar,Time-Delay Interferometry,Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 6

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Smith, T.L

    T.L. Smith, T.L. Smith, R.R. Caldwell and R. Caldwell,LISA for Cosmologists: Calculating the Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Stochastic and Deterministic Sources,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 104055 [1908.00546]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Discriminating between a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background and Instrument Noise

    M.R. Adams and N.J. Cornish,Discriminating between a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background and Instrument Noise,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 022002 [1002.1291]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Tinto and S.V

    M. Tinto and S.V . Dhurandhar,TIME DELAY,Living Rev. Rel.8(2005) 4 [gr-qc/0409034]

    work page arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    Confusion Noise from LISA Capture Sources

    L. Barack and C. Cutler,Confusion noise from LISA capture sources,Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 122002 [gr-qc/0409010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    LISA COSMOLOGYWORKINGGROUPcollaboration,Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation, JCAP10(2024) 020 [2403.03723]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    LISA Data Analysis using MCMC methods

    N.J. Cornish and J. Crowder,LISA data analysis using MCMC methods,Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 043005 [gr-qc/0506059]. – 33 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    Littenberg and N.J

    T.B. Littenberg and N.J. Cornish,Prototype global analysis of LISA data with multiple source types,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 063004 [2301.03673]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Rosati and T.B

    R. Rosati and T.B. Littenberg,Prototype Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background Recovery in the LISA Global Fit Residual,2410.17180

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Gowling and M

    C. Gowling and M. Hindmarsh,Observational prospects for phase transitions at LISA: Fisher matrix analysis,JCAP10(2021) 039 [2106.05984]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Gowling, M

    C. Gowling, M. Hindmarsh, D.C. Hooper and J. Torrado,Reconstructing physical parameters from template gravitational wave spectra at LISA: first order phase transitions, JCAP04(2023) 061 [2209.13551]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Boileau, N

    G. Boileau, N. Christensen, C. Gowling, M. Hindmarsh and R. Meyer,Prospects for LISA to detect a gravitational-wave background from first order phase transitions,JCAP02 (2023) 056 [2209.13277]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Lewicki, M

    M. Lewicki, M. Merchand, L. Sagunski, P. Schicho and D. Schmitt,Impact of theoretical uncertainties on model parameter reconstruction from GW signals sourced by cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 023538 [2403.03769]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Huang, Z.-C

    F. Huang, Z.-C. Chen and Q.-G. Huang,Detecting Cosmological Phase Transitions with Taiji: Sensitivity Analysis and Parameter Estimation,Chin. Phys. C49(2025) 10 [2504.16712]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Ramsey-Musolf,The electroweak phase transition: a collider target,JHEP09(2020) 179 [1912.07189]

    M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,The electroweak phase transition: a collider target,JHEP09(2020) 179 [1912.07189]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    A global view on the Higgs self-coupling at lepton colliders

    S. Di Vita, G. Durieux, C. Grojean, J. Gu, Z. Liu, G. Panico et al.,A global view on the Higgs self-coupling at lepton colliders,JHEP02(2018) 178 [1711.03978]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    ATLAS collaboration,Probing the nature of electroweak symmetry breaking with Higgs boson pairs in ATLAS, in30th International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects, 7, 2023 [2307.11467]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Collider and Gravitational Wave Complementarity in Exploring the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model

    A. Alves, T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha and D. Vagie,Collider and Gravitational Wave Complementarity in Exploring the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model,JHEP04 (2019) 052 [1812.09333]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet

    V . Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet,Phys. Rev. D 77(2008) 035005 [0706.4311]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Singlet Higgs Phenomenology and the Electroweak Phase Transition

    S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP08(2007) 010 [0705.2425]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Singlet-Catalyzed Electroweak Phase Transitions and Precision Higgs Studies

    S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, C.L. Wainwright and P. Winslow,Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 035018 [1407.5342]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Resonant Di-Higgs Production in the $b{\bar b}WW$ Channel: Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition at the LHC

    T. Huang, J.M. No, L. Perni ´e, M. Ramsey-Musolf, A. Safonov, M. Spannowsky et al., Resonant di-Higgs boson production in theb ¯bW Wchannel: Probing the electroweak phase transition at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 035007 [1701.04442]. – 34 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    Primordial black holes from first-order phase transition in the singlet-extended SM,

    D. Gonc ¸alves, A. Kaladharan and Y . Wu,Primordial black holes from first-order phase transition in the singlet-extended SM,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 035009 [2406.07622]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    L. Bian, H. Wang, Y . Xiao, J.-C. Yang, J.M. Yang and Y . Zhang,Enhancing Phase Transition Calculations with Fitting and Neural Network,2510.10667

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, W. Searle, Y . Xiao et al.,PhaseTracer2: from the effective potential to gravitational waves,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 559 [2412.04881]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Bal ´azs, A. Fowlie and Y . Zhang,PhaseTracer: tracing cosmological phases and calculating transition properties,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 567 [2003.02859]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Croon, O

    D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T.V .I. Tenkanen and G. White,Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions,JHEP04(2021) 055 [2009.10080]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, G. White and Y . Zhang,How arbitrary are perturbative calculations of the electroweak phase transition?,JHEP01(2023) 050 [2208.01319]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Athron, L

    P. Athron, L. Morris and Z. Xu,How robust are gravitational wave predictions from cosmological phase transitions?,JCAP05(2024) 075 [2309.05474]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Y . Zhu, J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Theoretical uncertainties in first-order electroweak phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015018 [2503.19566]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition, and Perturbation Theory

    H.H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Baryon Washout, Electroweak Phase Transition, and Perturbation Theory,JHEP07(2011) 029 [1101.4665]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [65]

    Arunasalam and M.J

    S. Arunasalam and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Tunneling potentials for the tunneling action: gauge invariance,JHEP08(2022) 138 [2105.07588]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    L ¨ofgren, M.J

    J. L ¨ofgren, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho and T.V .I. Tenkanen,Nucleation at Finite Temperature: A Gauge-Invariant Perturbative Framework,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 251801 [2112.05472]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Hirvonen, J

    J. Hirvonen, J. L ¨ofgren, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho and T.V .I. Tenkanen,Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory, JHEP07(2022) 135 [2112.08912]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie and G. White,The benefits of diligence: how precise are predicted gravitational wave spectra in models with phase transitions?,JHEP06(2021) 164 [2103.06933]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Guth and E.J

    A.H. Guth and E.J. Weinberg,Cosmological Consequences of a First Order Phase Transition in the SU(5) Grand Unified Model,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 876

    work page 1981

  70. [70]

    Hindmarsh, M

    M.B. Hindmarsh, M. L ¨uben, J. Lumma and M. Pauly,Phase transitions in the early universe,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes24(2021) 1 [2008.09136]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 041301 [1304.2433]. – 35 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Kosowsky, M.S

    A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4514

    work page 1992

  73. [73]

    Kosowsky, M.S

    A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2026

    work page 1992

  74. [74]

    Gravitational Radiation from Colliding Vacuum Bubbles: Envelope Approximation to Many-Bubble Collisions

    A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4372 [astro-ph/9211004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  75. [75]

    Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles

    S.J. Huber and T. Konstandin,Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles,JCAP09(2008) 022 [0806.1828]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [76]

    Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: analytic derivation

    R. Jinno and M. Takimoto,Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: An analytic derivation,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 024009 [1605.01403]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    Jinno and M

    R. Jinno and M. Takimoto,Gravitational waves from bubble dynamics: Beyond the Envelope,JCAP01(2019) 060 [1707.03111]

    work page arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D 92(2015) 123009 [1504.03291]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  79. [79]

    Cai, S.-J

    R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang and Z.-Y . Yuwen,Hydrodynamic sound shell model,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) L021502 [2305.00074]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Roper Pol, S

    A. Roper Pol, S. Procacci and C. Caprini,Characterization of the gravitational wave spectrum from sound waves within the sound shell model,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063531 [2308.12943]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.