pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22810 · v1 · pith:LLCCTV4Bnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· math-ph· math.MP

A Linearized Obstruction to the Supersymmetric Extension of Conformal Boundary Conditions in Euclidean Gravity

Xingyang Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 08:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords conformal boundary conditionssupersymmetryEuclidean gravitygravitino boundary conditionslinearized supergravityWitten boundary conditionobstructionelliptic boundary value problem
0
0 comments X

The pith

Witten's conformal boundary conditions for Euclidean gravity have no half-supersymmetric extension in linearized minimal supergravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that for fixed conformal bosonic boundary data, no choice of half-dimensional gravitino boundary condition can preserve the full chiral supersymmetry. Supersymmetry acting on the natural local chiral gravitino datum generates the trace-free extrinsic curvature, which the conformal prescription deliberately leaves free as a response. This mismatch creates a pointwise obstruction in tangential momentum space that survives gauge transformations. The result is a highest-derivative linearized no-go, independent of any particular elliptic ansatz or global topology. A sympathetic reader would care because it limits the perturbative Euclidean path integral constructions that can be made supersymmetric at the linear level.

Core claim

For fixed conformal bosonic data, no half-dimensional gravitino boundary condition, whether local or pseudodifferential and including APS-type conditions with compatible ghost conditions, closes the preserved chiral supersymmetry. Supersymmetry selects the chiral gravitino datum whose image under the supersymmetry transformation is the trace-free extrinsic curvature left unfixed by the conformal boundary condition, producing an obstruction at the highest derivative order that persists even after compensating gauge transformations.

What carries the argument

The linearized supersymmetry transformation that maps the chiral gravitino boundary datum to the trace-free extrinsic curvature, acting pointwise in tangential momentum.

If this is right

  • Any attempt to extend the conformal boundary condition to supersymmetry must fail at linear order without additional structures.
  • The obstruction is independent of the choice of elliptic boundary condition for the gravitino.
  • Nonlinear supercovariant boundary terms may evade the obstruction by relating the trace-free extrinsic curvature to gravitino bilinears.
  • The result applies specifically to the perturbative Euclidean gravitational path integral with fixed conformal class and mean curvature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar obstructions might appear in other supersymmetric extensions of gravitational boundary conditions beyond minimal supergravity.
  • Investigating whether the nonlinear theory allows tying the bosonic response to fermionic terms could resolve the issue for finite boundaries.
  • Extensions to higher-derivative or non-minimal supergravities might bypass the linearized obstruction through different field content.

Load-bearing premise

Any viable supersymmetric extension must preserve the chiral supersymmetry exactly through a boundary condition on the gravitino at linear order without nonlinear supercovariant corrections or structures linking the trace-free extrinsic curvature to fermionic bilinears.

What would settle it

An explicit construction of a half-dimensional gravitino boundary condition that preserves the full chiral supersymmetry while leaving the trace-free extrinsic curvature as an unfixed response to the conformal data.

read the original abstract

Witten's conformal boundary condition \cite{Witten:2018lgb} provides an elliptic boundary-value problem for the finite-boundary perturbative Euclidean gravitational path integral: one fixes the boundary conformal class and the mean curvature, while the trace-free extrinsic curvature is left free as the conjugate response. We show that this perturbative construction admits no half-supersymmetric extension in linearized minimal supergravity. For fixed conformal bosonic data, no half-dimensional gravitino boundary condition (local or pseudodifferential, APS-type included, with any compatible ghost condition at highest-derivative order) closes the full preserved chiral supersymmetry. Supersymmetry first selects the natural local chiral gravitino datum. Acting back on this datum then produces the trace-free extrinsic curvature, precisely the response that the conformal prescription leaves unfixed. The obstruction is therefore not the failure of a particular elliptic ansatz: even the chiral/Robin completion that is LS-elliptic and BRST-compatible at highest-derivative order would impose Dirichlet control on a Neumann response. The obstruction is pointwise in tangential momentum and survives compensating gauge transformations. It is a linearized, highest-derivative obstruction, not a global or nonlinear no-go; nonlinear supercovariant boundary terms may evade it by tying the trace-free extrinsic curvature to gravitino bilinears.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Witten's conformal boundary condition for the perturbative Euclidean gravitational path integral—which fixes the boundary conformal class and mean curvature while leaving the trace-free extrinsic curvature as a free response—admits no half-supersymmetric extension in linearized minimal supergravity. For any fixed conformal bosonic data, no half-dimensional gravitino boundary condition (local or pseudodifferential, including APS-type, with compatible ghost conditions) closes the preserved chiral supersymmetry. Supersymmetry maps the natural chiral gravitino datum onto the trace-free extrinsic curvature; the obstruction is pointwise in tangential momentum, survives gauge compensations, and is a highest-derivative linearized effect (with nonlinear supercovariant corrections noted as a possible evasion).

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the result is significant for Euclidean supergravity and boundary-value problems in path integrals. It supplies a parameter-free, direct derivation from the action of supersymmetry transformations on boundary data, explicitly restricted to linear order, that rules out a broad class of gravitino conditions without hidden circularity. This constrains attempts to supersymmetrize conformal boundaries and identifies a concrete highest-derivative obstruction that future nonlinear constructions must address.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states the obstruction clearly but could briefly indicate the precise dimension of the gravitino space relative to the bosonic data for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The report accurately captures the central claim and its implications for Euclidean supergravity boundary-value problems.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a direct computation of the action of linearized supersymmetry transformations on the gravitino boundary datum, which maps it onto the trace-free extrinsic curvature left unfixed by the conformal bosonic boundary condition. This holds pointwise in tangential momentum and is independent of any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The argument explicitly restricts itself to linear order and notes that nonlinear corrections could evade the obstruction, confirming the result is self-contained against the stated assumptions without reducing to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; no free parameters are mentioned, and the axioms are standard domain assumptions of linearized supergravity.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Analysis restricted to linearized minimal supergravity
    The obstruction is explicitly stated to be linearized.
  • domain assumption Boundary conditions considered are local or pseudodifferential with compatible ghost conditions at highest derivative order
    The paper rules out all such classes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5764 in / 1315 out tokens · 35901 ms · 2026-06-26T08:04:54.987790+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A note on boundary conditions in Euclidean gravity

    Witten, Edward. A note on boundary conditions in Euclidean gravity. Rev. Math. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1142/S0129055X21400043. arXiv:1805.11559

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x21400043 2021

  2. [2]

    On boundary value problems for Einstein metrics

    Anderson, Michael T. On boundary value problems for Einstein metrics. Geom. Topol. 2008. doi:10.2140/gt.2008.12.2009. arXiv:math/0612647

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.2140/gt.2008.12.2009 2008

  3. [3]

    Spectral Boundary Conditions in One-Loop Quantum Cosmology

    D'Eath, Peter D. and Esposito, Giampiero. Spectral boundary conditions in one loop quantum cosmology. Phys. Rev. D. 1991. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.1713. arXiv:gr-qc/9507005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.1713 1991

  4. [4]

    Local Boundary Conditions in Quantum Supergravity

    Esposito, Giampiero. Local boundary conditions in quantum supergravity. Phys. Lett. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01314-7. arXiv:hep-th/9608076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01314-7 1996

  5. [5]

    Boundary Operators in Euclidean Quantum Gravity

    Avramidi, Ivan G. and Esposito, Giampiero and Kamenshchik, Alexander Yu. Boundary operators in Euclidean quantum gravity. Class. Quant. Grav. 1996. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/9/004. arXiv:hep-th/9603021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/9/004 1996

  6. [6]

    BRST-invariant boundary conditions and strong ellipticity

    Moss, Ian G. BRST-invariant boundary conditions and strong ellipticity. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.104039. arXiv:1301.0717

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.104039 2013

  7. [7]

    Consistent boundary conditions for supergravity

    van Nieuwenhuizen, Peter and Vassilevich, Dmitri V. Consistent boundary conditions for supergravity. Class. Quant. Grav. 2005. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/23/008. arXiv:hep-th/0507172

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/23/008 2005

  8. [8]

    Boundary conditions in supergravity on a manifold with boundary

    Belyaev, Dmitry V. Boundary conditions in supergravity on a manifold with boundary. JHEP. 2006. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/047. arXiv:hep-th/0509172

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/047 2006

  9. [9]

    Tensor calculus for supergravity on a manifold with boundary

    Belyaev, Dmitry V. and van Nieuwenhuizen, Peter. Tensor calculus for supergravity on a manifold with boundary. JHEP. 2008. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/047. arXiv:0711.2272

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/047 2008

  10. [10]

    Simple d=4 supergravity with a boundary

    Belyaev, Dmitry V. and van Nieuwenhuizen, Peter. Simple d=4 supergravity with a boundary. JHEP. 2008. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/069. arXiv:0806.4723

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/069 2008

  11. [11]

    The supermultiplet of boundary conditions in supergravity

    Belyaev, Dmitry V. and Pugh, Tom G. The Supermultiplet of boundary conditions in supergravity. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)031. arXiv:1008.1574

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)031 2010

  12. [12]

    Boundary Value Problems for Elliptic Differential Operators of First Order

    B \"a r, Christian and Ballmann, Werner. Boundary value problems for elliptic differential operators of first order. Surveys in Differential Geometry. 2012. doi:10.4310/SDG.2012.v17.n1.a1. arXiv:1101.1196

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/sdg.2012.v17.n1.a1 2012

  13. [13]

    Lopatinskii, Ya. B. On a method of reducing boundary problems for a system of differential equations of elliptic type to regular integral equations. Ukrain. Mat. Zh. 1953

    1953

  14. [14]

    Shapiro, Z. Ya. On general boundary value problems for equations of elliptic type. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 1953

    1953

  15. [15]

    Interior estimates for elliptic systems of partial differential equations

    Douglis, Avron and Nirenberg, Louis. Interior estimates for elliptic systems of partial differential equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1955

    1955

  16. [16]

    Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary conditions

    Agmon, Shmuel and Douglis, Avron and Nirenberg, Louis. Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary conditions. I. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1959

    1959

  17. [17]

    Calderon, A. P. Boundary value problems for elliptic equations. Outlines of the Joint Soviet-American Symposium on Partial Differential Equations. 1963

    1963

  18. [18]

    Seeley, R. T. Singular integrals and boundary value problems. Amer. J. Math. 1966

    1966

  19. [19]

    On a theory of particles with half integral spin

    Rarita, William and Schwinger, Julian. On a theory of particles with half integral spin. Phys. Rev. 1941. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.60.61

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.60.61 1941

  20. [20]

    and Rouet, A

    Becchi, C. and Rouet, A. and Stora, R. Renormalization of Gauge Theories. Annals Phys. 1976. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(76)90156-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(76)90156-1 1976

  21. [21]

    Tyutin, I. V. Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism. 1975. arXiv:0812.0580

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1975

  22. [22]

    Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops

    Pestun, Vasily. Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops. Commun. Math. Phys. 2012. doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1485-0. arXiv:0712.2824

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1485-0 2012

  23. [23]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity

    Israel, W. Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity. Nuovo Cim. B. 1966. doi:10.1007/BF02710419

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02710419 1966

  24. [24]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity

    Jackiw, R. Lower Dimensional Gravity. Nucl. Phys. B. 1985. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90448-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90448-1 1985

  25. [25]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions

    Teitelboim, C. Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions. Phys. Lett. B. 1983. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90012-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90012-6 1983

  26. [26]

    (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,

    Witten, Edward. (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System. Nucl. Phys. B. 1988. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5 1988

  27. [27]

    Minimal Off-Shell Supergravity in Five Dimensions

    Zucker, Max. Minimal off-shell supergravity in five-dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 2000. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00750-6. arXiv:hep-th/9907082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00750-6 2000

  28. [28]

    and Sezgin, E

    Nishino, H. and Sezgin, E. Matter and Gauge Couplings of N=2 Supergravity in Six-Dimensions. Phys. Lett. B. 1984. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91800-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91800-8 1984

  29. [29]

    Vassilevich, D. V. Heat kernel expansion: User's manual. Phys. Rept. 2003. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2003.09.002. arXiv:hep-th/0306138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2003.09.002 2003

  30. [30]

    Supergravity

    Van Nieuwenhuizen, P. Supergravity. Phys. Rept. 1981. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(81)90157-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(81)90157-5 1981

  31. [31]

    Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation

    York, Jr., James W. Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1972. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.1082

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.28.1082 1972

  32. [32]

    Conformally invariant orthogonal decomposition of symmetric tensors on Riemannian manifolds and the initial value problem of general relativity

    York, Jr., James W. Conformally invariant orthogonal decomposition of symmetric tensors on Riemannian manifolds and the initial value problem of general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 1973. doi:10.1063/1.1666338

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1666338 1973

  33. [33]

    Quasilocal Energy and Conserved Charges Derived from the Gravitational Action

    Brown, J. David and York, Jr., James W. Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action. Phys. Rev. D. 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1407. arXiv:gr-qc/9209012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.1407 1993

  34. [34]

    The Microcanonical Functional Integral. I. The Gravitational Field

    Brown, J. David and York, Jr., James W. The Microcanonical functional integral. 1. The Gravitational field. Phys. Rev. D. 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1420. arXiv:gr-qc/9209014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.1420 1993

  35. [35]

    Gibbons, G. W. and Hawking, S. W. Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity. Phys. Rev. D. 1977. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2752 1977

  36. [36]

    Hawking, S. W. and Horowitz, Gary T. The Gravitational Hamiltonian, action, entropy and surface terms. Class. Quant. Grav. 1996. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/6/017. arXiv:gr-qc/9501014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/6/017 1996

  37. [37]

    A Stress Tensor for Anti-de Sitter Gravity

    Balasubramanian, Vijay and Kraus, Per. A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity. Commun. Math. Phys. 1999. doi:10.1007/s002200050764. arXiv:hep-th/9902121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s002200050764 1999

  38. [38]

    Holographic Reconstruction of Spacetime and Renormalization in the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    de Haro, Sebastian and Solodukhin, Sergey N. and Skenderis, Kostas. Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence. Commun. Math. Phys. 2001. doi:10.1007/s002200100381. arXiv:hep-th/0002230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s002200100381 2001

  39. [39]

    Holographic renormalization and supersymmetry

    Benetti Genolini, Pietro and Cassani, Davide and Martelli, Dario and Sparks, James. Holographic renormalization and supersymmetry. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)132. arXiv:1612.06761

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)132 2017

  40. [40]

    Comments on Supercurrent Multiplets, Supersymmetric Field Theories and Supergravity

    Komargodski, Zohar and Seiberg, Nathan. Comments on Supercurrent Multiplets, Supersymmetric Field Theories and Supergravity. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)017. arXiv:1002.2228

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2010)017 2010

  41. [41]

    Rigid Supersymmetric Theories in Curved Superspace

    Festuccia, Guido and Seiberg, Nathan. Rigid Supersymmetric Theories in Curved Superspace. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2011)114. arXiv:1105.0689

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2011)114 2011

  42. [42]

    On Supersymmetry, Boundary Actions and Brane Charges

    Di Pietro, Lorenzo and Klinghoffer, Nizan and Shamir, Itamar. On Supersymmetry, Boundary Actions and Brane Charges. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)163. arXiv:1502.05976

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)163 2016

  43. [43]

    BRST Invariant Boundary Conditions for Gauge Theories

    Moss, Ian G. and Silva, Pedro J. BRST invariant boundary conditions for gauge theories. Phys. Rev. D. 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1072. arXiv:gr-qc/9610023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.1072 1997

  44. [44]

    and Wiseman, Toby

    Liu, Xiaoyi and Santos, Jorge E. and Wiseman, Toby. New Well-Posed boundary conditions for semi-classical Euclidean gravity. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)044. arXiv:2402.04308

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)044 2024

  45. [45]

    and Maneerat, Chawakorn

    Anninos, Dionysios and Galante, Dami \'a n A. and Maneerat, Chawakorn. Gravitational observatories. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)024. arXiv:2310.08648

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)024 2023

  46. [46]

    Thermal effective actions from conformal boundary conditions in gravity

    Banihashemi, Batoul and Shaghoulian, Edgar and Shashi, Sanjit. Thermal effective actions from conformal boundary conditions in gravity. Class. Quant. Grav. 2025. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adee72. arXiv:2503.17471

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adee72 2025

  47. [47]

    Holographic Dual of BCFT

    Takayanagi, Tadashi. Holographic Dual of BCFT. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.101602. arXiv:1105.5165

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.101602 2011

  48. [48]

    Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on a Manifold with Boundary

    Ho r ava, Petr and Witten, Edward. Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2. arXiv:hep-th/9603142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00308-2 1996

  49. [49]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    Maldacena, Juan and Stanford, Douglas and Yang, Zhenbin. Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space. PTEP. 2016. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124. arXiv:1606.01857

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124 2016

  50. [50]

    Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models

    Fu, Wenbo and Gaiotto, Davide and Maldacena, Juan and Sachdev, Subir. Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.026009. arXiv:1610.08917

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.026009 2017

  51. [51]

    JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory

    Stanford, Douglas and Witten, Edward. JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2020. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2020.v24.n6.a4. arXiv:1907.03363

    work page doi:10.4310/atmp.2020.v24.n6.a4 2020

  52. [52]

    and Townsend, P.K

    Achucarro, A. and Townsend, P.K. A Chern-Simons Action for Three-Dimensional anti-De Sitter Supergravity Theories. Phys. Lett. B. 1986. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90140-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90140-1 1986

  53. [53]

    Supersymmetric Boundary Conditions in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    Gaiotto, Davide and Witten, Edward. Supersymmetric Boundary Conditions in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory. J. Statist. Phys. 2009. doi:10.1007/s10955-009-9687-3. arXiv:0804.2902

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10955-009-9687-3 2009

  54. [54]

    Conformal boundary condition and massive gravitons in AdS/BCFT

    Chu, Chong-Sun and Miao, Rong-Xin. Conformal boundary condition and massive gravitons in AdS/BCFT. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)084. arXiv:2110.03159

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2022)084 2022

  55. [55]

    Codimension two holography for wedges

    Akal, Ibrahim and Kusuki, Yuya and Takayanagi, Tadashi and Wei, Zixia. Codimension two holography for wedges. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.126007. arXiv:2007.06800

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.126007 2020

  56. [56]

    Holography at finite cutoff with a $T^2$ deformation

    Hartman, Thomas and Kruthoff, Jorrit and Shaghoulian, Edgar and Tajdini, Amirhossein. Holography at finite cutoff with a T^2 deformation. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)004. arXiv:1807.11401

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2019)004 2019

  57. [57]

    Atiyah, M. F. and Patodi, V. K. and Singer, I. M. Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian Geometry 1. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1975. doi:10.1017/S0305004100049410

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100049410 1975

  58. [58]

    Atiyah, M. F. and Patodi, V. K. and Singer, I. M. Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry 2. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1976. doi:10.1017/S0305004100051872

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100051872 1976

  59. [59]

    Atiyah, M. F. and Patodi, V. K. and Singer, I. M. Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. III. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1976. doi:10.1017/S0305004100052105

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100052105 1976

  60. [60]

    Moving the CFT into the bulk with $T\bar T$

    McGough, Lauren and Mezei, M \'a rk and Verlinde, Herman. Moving the CFT into the bulk with T T. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2018)010. arXiv:1611.03470

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2018)010 2018

  61. [61]

    and Santos, Jorge E

    Liu, Xiaoyi and Reall, Harvey S. and Santos, Jorge E. and Wiseman, Toby. Ill-posedness of the Cauchy problem for linearized gravity in a cavity with conformal boundary conditions. Class. Quant. Grav. 2025. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae1b60. arXiv:2505.20410

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae1b60 2025

  62. [62]

    and Myers, Robert C

    Galante, Dami \'a n A. and Myers, Robert C. and Zikopoulos, Themistocles. Conformal Boundary Conditions and Higher Curvature Gravity. 2025. arXiv:2512.10930

    arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Mixed boundary conditions in quantum field theory

    Luckock, Hugh. Mixed boundary conditions in quantum field theory. J. Math. Phys. 1991. doi:10.1063/1.529238

    work page doi:10.1063/1.529238 1991

  64. [64]

    Boundary terms for globally supersymmetric actions

    Luckock, Hugh. Boundary terms for globally supersymmetric actions. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1997. doi:10.1007/BF02435744

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02435744 1997

  65. [65]

    and Pollifrone, Giuseppe

    Esposito, Giampiero and Kamenshchik, Alexander Yu. and Pollifrone, Giuseppe. Euclidean quantum gravity on manifolds with boundary. 1997. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5806-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5806-0 1997

  66. [66]

    Spin-3/2 Potentials in Backgrounds with Boundary

    Esposito, Giampiero and Gionti, Gabriele and Kamenshchik, Alexander Yu. and Mishakov, Igor V. and Pollifrone, Giuseppe. Spin 3/2 potentials in backgrounds with boundary. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 1995. doi:10.1142/S0218271895000491. arXiv:gr-qc/9507014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271895000491 1995

  67. [67]

    and Maneerat, Chawakorn

    Anninos, Dionysios and Galante, Dami \'a n A. and Maneerat, Chawakorn. Cosmological observatories. Class. Quant. Grav. 2024. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad5824. arXiv:2402.04305

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad5824 2024

  68. [68]

    and Maneerat, Chawakorn

    Anninos, Dionysios and Arias, Ra \'u l and Galante, Dami \'a n A. and Maneerat, Chawakorn. Gravitational observatories in AdS _ 4. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)234. arXiv:2412.16305

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2025)234 2025