pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02093 · v1 · pith:QYF3UWQZnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · 🧮 math-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th· math.MP· nlin.SI· quant-ph

Open-boundary integrable quantum circuits with different geometries

Miguel Garc\'ia Fern\'andez , Chiara Paletta , Ana L. Retore This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 04:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath.MPnlin.SIquant-ph
keywords integrable quantum circuitsYang-Baxter equationopen boundary conditionsstaggered inhomogeneitiesreflection matricesvertex modelstime-periodic circuitscircuit geometries
0
0 comments X

The pith

Time-periodic quantum circuits with open boundaries are integrable for arbitrary geometries when bulk and boundary gates satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation and each bulk gate appears once per period.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from the standard transfer-matrix method that uses two kinds of staggered inhomogeneities and derives a mapping that fixes how gates must be placed for any circuit shape and system size. It conjectures that integrability holds for any time-periodic circuit whose local gates obey the Yang-Baxter equation and whose bulk gate is applied exactly once per period to every neighboring pair. The authors add a third inhomogeneity type called rho and prove that the shortest possible circuits have depth four; when rho sits at the ends, the resulting boundary operators act as single multi-site gates. The construction works for any regular R-matrix of difference or non-difference type together with its reflection matrices, and it supplies an explicit algorithm that checks Yang-Baxter integrability on arbitrary layouts. As a concrete case the paper builds circuits from six- and eight-vertex R-matrices of non-difference form.

Core claim

Starting from the standard transfer-matrix construction with two types of staggered inhomogeneities, a general mapping determines the arrangement of circuit gates in terms of the inhomogeneities and the system size. Time-periodic quantum circuits are conjectured to be integrable whenever the local bulk and boundary gates satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation and the same bulk gate is applied exactly once per period to every nearest-neighbor pair of spins. A third type of inhomogeneity denoted by rho is introduced, showing that the minimum possible circuit depth is four, and that rho-inhomogeneities at the endpoints allow boundary gates to be interpreted as single gates acting on multiple sites. T

What carries the argument

The mapping from staggered inhomogeneities in the transfer matrix to the positions and ordering of local bulk and boundary gates in the circuit.

If this is right

  • An algorithm exists to detect Yang-Baxter integrability for circuits of arbitrary geometries.
  • Integrable circuits can be built from six- and eight-vertex R-matrices of non-difference form together with their reflection matrices.
  • Boundary operators can act on multiple consecutive sites when rho-inhomogeneities are placed at the endpoints.
  • The shortest integrable open-boundary circuits have depth four.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inhomogeneity-to-gate mapping may generate new families of integrable circuits once the conjecture is verified for small sizes.
  • Multi-site boundary gates obtained from rho-inhomogeneities could be used to introduce longer-range interactions while keeping the circuit integrable.
  • The detection algorithm supplies a practical test that can be applied to any proposed circuit geometry without first solving the full spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The standard transfer-matrix construction with two types of staggered inhomogeneities admits a general mapping to arbitrary circuit geometries while preserving integrability.

What would settle it

An explicit small-system circuit in which every bulk gate appears once per period, all gates satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation, yet the circuit possesses fewer independent conserved charges than required for integrability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02093 by Ana L. Retore, Chiara Paletta, Miguel Garc\'ia Fern\'andez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Graphical representation of the basic gates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Brickwork circuit of length N = 5, with time flowing from bottom to top. The orange colour identifies the positions of the −κ inhomogeneities in the transfer matrix (9). All remaining inhomogeneities are set equal to κ. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Brickwork circuit of length N = 6, with time flowing from bottom to top. This generalises the construction of [30] for R-matrices of non-difference form. It is easy to check that upon imposing the restriction R(u, v) → R(u−v), our expressions reduce to those found in the literature, [30]. In the next section, we generalise this construction to circuits characterized by different gate configurations (differ… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A quantum circuit for N = 9. Applying our procedure leads to the inhomo￾geneities configuration in equation (57) and it falls under Theorem 2. α = −(κ1 + κ2 )/2 and then define κ = (κ1 − κ2 )/2, suggesting that the two models are equivalent. However, this is not the case: such a shift of the spectral parameters does not satisfy the property (18), and therefore gives rise to a different model. 15 [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A quantum circuit for N = 9. This falls under Theorem 1. Step 1: M = U78U56K R 1 (κ)U12U45U67U89U34K˜ L 9 (κ)U23. Step 2: K˜ L 9 is below U89, therefore, we know that nκ− ̸= 9. This implies θN = +κ, consistent with the framework of Theorem 1. Step 3: M = U78U56U45U34K R 1 (κ)U12U23U67U89K˜ L 9 (κ). Step 4: We know from step 2 that nκ− ̸= 9, and from step 3 that there are four U gates to the left of K R 1 .… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quantum circuits for N = 5 for three different choices of n⃗. The orange colour indicates the position of the −κ’s. In this example and in Eqs. (42) and (53), we observe that circuits with the same κ− but different configurations n⃗ can differ significantly in structure, and in particular may have 12If AB⃗v = λ⃗v with λ ̸= 0, then BAB⃗v = λB⃗v, showing that the corresponding eigenvectors are related by the… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Representation of a quantum circuit with odd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Quantum circuits with N = 13 and all the possible choices of κ−, 0 ≤ κ− ≤ N−1 2 that correspond to a quantum circuit with minimum depth. What about N−1 2 < κ− ≤ N? The cases analysed cover all possible values of κ−. In fact, there is a duality between κ− and N −κ−. Therefore, the circuit for N−1 2 < κ− ≤ N is obtained by reversing the order of the time 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Circuit for odd N, depth d and N−1 2 < κ− ≤ N. Similarly, for even N, d > 2 we also obtain the same pattern, but now with d − 1 gates on the left side. This is represented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Circuit for even N and depth d > 2. As we discussed for odd N, there also exists a duality between κ− and N − κ− for even N. The corresponding quantum circuit can be represented as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Circuit for even N and depth d = 2. 3.2.3 Discussion There is a clear intuition for why Conjectures 1 and 2 lead to the quantum circuits shown in Figures 7–11. On the one hand, purely staggered chains naturally produce brickwork-type quantum circuits. On the other hand, taking all inhomogeneities to be equal gives rise to staircase-type circuits. A closer inspection of Conjectures 1 and 2 shows that the p… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Quantum gates depending on κ and the new inhomogeneity ρ. 3.3.1 Circuits with minimum depth and different geometries As before, our goal is to minimise the depth. To this end, first observe that, if we set M = t(κ), Lemmas 1 and 2 remain valid even after introducing a third type of inhomogeneity14, denoted by ρ. When only two inhomogeneities, κ and −κ, were present, the minimum achievable depth was d = 2.… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Quantum circuits with minimum depth for N = 7 and ρ+ = 3, 2, 1. Moreover, contrary to the (κ,−κ), here there is no symmetry between ρ+ and N − ρ+. Additionally, we remark that deviating from the configurations in equation (72) can lead to an increase in depth. In particular, for n⃗ ρ = (N −1,N −2,··· , 3, 2, 1) the circuit has depth d = 2N (see for example, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Quantum circuit with N = 7 and n⃗ ρ = (6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). We remark that in all cases we checked with odd N and only +κ and ρ (but no −κ), the depth was always d ≥ N +1. We checked this for all cases for N = 5, 6, 7, 9 and some randomly chosen cases for N = 11, 13, 15. Another difference is that, for this case with +κ and ρ, there are three types of bulk gates (V, W and U), and it is easy to see that Theo… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: presents an example of all quantum circuits in this conjecture for N = 12 (which corresponds to m = 4). Conjecture 3b: For a system with N = 3m − 1 sites, m ∈ N≥2 , κ− = m and 1 ≤ ρ+ ≤ m − 1, the configuration that minimises the depth is n⃗ = (N − 1,N − 4,··· , 4, 1), n⃗ ρ = (3ρ+, 3ρ+ − 3,··· , 6, 3). (76) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Quantum circuits for N = 11 (m = 4), with κ− = 4 and 1 ≤ ρ+ ≤ 3. The −κ’s are located in the following sites n⃗ = (10, 7, 4, 1). 17We could equivalently have replaced the ρ at position (4), rather than the one at position (10), since permuting the positions of the inhomogeneities does not affect the spectrum. The resulting quantum circuits are equivalent, so we choose the arrangement that is more convenie… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Quantum circuits for N = 10 (m = 4), with κ− = 3 and 1 ≤ ρ+ ≤ 3. The −κ’s are located in the following sites n⃗ = (9, 6, 3). What about t(ρ)? Since in this setting we have three types of inhomogeneity κ,−κ and ρ, in addition to M ∝ t(κ), we can also define the operator Me ∝ t(ρ). A period can then be written as Ml1 M˜ l2 for l1 , l2 ∈ N. However, in the cases considered in Conjectures 3a–3c, Me has depth … view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Effective boundary gates for θ1 = ρ. for nρ = 2 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Effective boundary gates for θ1 = θ2 = ρ. etc, until nρ = n in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Effective boundary gates for θ1 = θ2 = ··· = θn = ρ. 18Placing all inhomogeneities of ρ type in the end of the chain leads to the definition of a similar effective gate, but now for the left boundary. 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Quantum circuit with N = 14 with θ1 = ρ and remaining θeven = κ and θodd = −κ. This is computed using M = t(κ). If we use t(ρ) instead, a completely different circuit is obtained. Thus, if we start from a brickwork-type circuit and add a new site at position one with inhomogeneity ρ, the resulting circuit has an effective depth of de = 2. In other words, by em￾ploying the effective boundary gate defined i… view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: General circuit for N sites and odd N − ρ+. For even N − ρ+, the only difference is that there is one less U gate on the left staircase part. Placing all the ρ’s at the end of the chain produces the same effect, but now on the left boundary. Alternatively, one can distribute them by placing nρ of the ρ’s at the beginning and the remaining n˜ρ at the end. This results in a left effective boundary gate of l… view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Alternative open quantum circuits for length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_23.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a complete classification of integrable Yang-Baxter quantum circuits with open boundary conditions and arbitrary circuit geometries. Starting from the standard transfer-matrix construction with two types of staggered inhomogeneities, we derive a general mapping that determines the arrangement of circuit gates in terms of the inhomogeneities and the system size. We conjecture that time-periodic quantum circuits are integrable whenever the local bulk and boundary gates satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation and the same bulk gate is applied exactly once per period to every nearest-neighbor pair of spins. Our construction also provides an algorithm to detect Yang-Baxter integrability for circuits with arbitrary geometries. Furthermore, we introduce a third type of inhomogeneity, denoted by $\rho$, and demonstrate that the minimum possible circuit depth is four. We show that when these $\rho$-inhomogeneities are placed at the endpoints and in their immediate neighborhood, the resulting boundary gates can be interpreted as single gates acting on multiple sites. Our construction is fully general and applies to regular $R$-matrices, both of difference and non-difference type, together with their associated boundary matrices. As an application, we consider two-qubit gates corresponding to 6- and 8-vertex $R$-matrices of non-difference form satisfying the Yang-Baxter equation, and we construct the associated reflection matrices that generate integrable quantum circuits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims a complete classification of integrable open-boundary Yang-Baxter quantum circuits for arbitrary geometries. It starts from the standard transfer-matrix construction with two (later three) types of staggered inhomogeneities, derives a mapping to gate arrangements, conjectures that time-periodic circuits are integrable when local bulk/boundary gates satisfy the YBE and the same bulk gate appears exactly once per period on every nearest-neighbor pair, introduces a ρ-inhomogeneity to reach minimum depth four, interprets endpoint ρ-inhomogeneities as multi-site boundary gates, and applies the framework to 6- and 8-vertex R-matrices of non-difference form together with their reflection matrices.

Significance. If the central conjecture holds and the mapping preserves integrability, the work supplies a general algorithm for detecting Yang-Baxter integrability in open circuits of irregular geometry and a constructive method for generating new integrable models from known R-matrices; the explicit treatment of non-difference-form R-matrices and the ρ-inhomogeneity construction are concrete strengths.

major comments (3)
  1. [conjecture and mapping derivation] The classification rests on the unproven conjecture (abstract and main construction) that local YBE satisfaction plus the once-per-period bulk-gate condition is sufficient for global integrability under the derived mapping; no explicit verification is given that the monodromy or transfer-matrix commutation relations survive for non-ladder or irregular open-boundary geometries.
  2. [mapping from transfer matrix to circuit gates] The general mapping from staggered inhomogeneities (two types, then three with ρ) to arbitrary circuit geometries is stated to determine gate arrangements, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the resulting family of operators commutes or generates conserved charges for geometries beyond the standard ladder case.
  3. [application section] In the application to 6- and 8-vertex R-matrices, the construction of reflection matrices is presented, yet no check is supplied that the full circuit Hamiltonians or transfer matrices obtained after the mapping indeed commute or satisfy the integrability condition beyond the local YBE.
minor comments (2)
  1. [ρ-inhomogeneity introduction] The definition and placement rules for the new ρ-inhomogeneity should be stated more explicitly, including how it differs from the two standard staggered types and why it forces minimum depth four.
  2. [boundary matrices] Notation for the boundary matrices and their relation to the reflection matrices could be clarified to avoid confusion with the bulk R-matrices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, acknowledging where the work relies on a stated conjecture and offering clarifications or additions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [conjecture and mapping derivation] The classification rests on the unproven conjecture that local YBE satisfaction plus the once-per-period bulk-gate condition is sufficient for global integrability under the derived mapping; no explicit verification is given that the monodromy or transfer-matrix commutation relations survive for non-ladder or irregular open-boundary geometries.

    Authors: We explicitly present the integrability statement as a conjecture in the abstract and main text, derived from the transfer-matrix construction with staggered inhomogeneities. The mapping is obtained by identifying gate positions with inhomogeneity placements, so that the circuit evolution corresponds to the transfer-matrix action. While this ensures consistency with the YBE at the local level, we agree that direct verification of commutation relations for irregular geometries is not provided and would strengthen the presentation. We will add a clarifying remark on the conjectural nature and a small-system numerical check for an irregular geometry in the revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [mapping from transfer matrix to circuit gates] The general mapping from staggered inhomogeneities to arbitrary circuit geometries is stated to determine gate arrangements, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the resulting family of operators commutes or generates conserved charges for geometries beyond the standard ladder case.

    Authors: The mapping is constructed directly from the transfer-matrix inhomogeneity pattern, which by design encodes the gate sequence for any geometry. Conserved charges are inherited from the commuting family of transfer matrices. We acknowledge that an independent demonstration of operator commutation for the mapped circuits in non-ladder cases is absent and relies on the conjecture. We will expand the derivation section to make this dependence explicit. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [application section] In the application to 6- and 8-vertex R-matrices, the construction of reflection matrices is presented, yet no check is supplied that the full circuit Hamiltonians or transfer matrices obtained after the mapping indeed commute or satisfy the integrability condition beyond the local YBE.

    Authors: The application focuses on constructing reflection matrices satisfying the boundary YBE for the chosen non-difference-form R-matrices; integrability of the resulting circuits then follows from the general framework. We agree that explicit commutation checks for the mapped transfer matrices in these examples are not included. We will add a brief verification for a small periodic circuit in the revised application section. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A general analytic proof that the mapping preserves monodromy commutation relations for arbitrary irregular open-boundary geometries (beyond the transfer-matrix derivation and the stated conjecture).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mapping derived from standard transfer-matrix; integrability stated as conjecture

full rationale

The paper starts from the established transfer-matrix construction with staggered inhomogeneities and derives a mapping to gate arrangements for arbitrary geometries. The central claim of integrability for time-periodic circuits is explicitly labeled a conjecture conditioned on local YBE satisfaction plus the once-per-period bulk-gate rule; it is not presented as a theorem that reduces to the paper's own inputs by construction. No self-citations appear as load-bearing steps, no parameters are fitted then relabeled as predictions, and no ansatz or uniqueness result is smuggled via prior author work. The algorithm for detection inherits the conjecture but does not create a definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The classification rests on the Yang-Baxter equation as a domain assumption from integrable-systems literature and introduces the new ρ-inhomogeneity entity without external falsifiable evidence.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Local bulk and boundary gates satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation.
    Invoked as the necessary condition for the integrability conjecture and the detection algorithm.
  • domain assumption Standard transfer-matrix construction with staggered inhomogeneities extends to arbitrary circuit geometries via the derived mapping.
    Starting point stated in the abstract for the general classification.
invented entities (1)
  • ρ-inhomogeneity no independent evidence
    purpose: To reduce minimum circuit depth to four and interpret boundary gates as multi-site operations when placed at endpoints.
    Newly introduced third inhomogeneity type; no independent evidence outside the construction is mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5788 in / 1388 out tokens · 48522 ms · 2026-07-03T04:02:23.243022+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    L. A. Takhtajan and L. D. Faddeev, The Quantum method of the inverse problem and the Heisenberg XYZ model , Russ. Math. Surveys 34(5), 11 (1979), [Usp. Mat. Nauk34,no.5,13(1979)]

    1979

  2. [2]

    How Algebraic Bethe Ansatz works for integrable model

    L. Faddeev, How algebraic Bethe ansatz works for integrable model (1996), https://arxiv. org/pdf/hep-th/9605187

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    A. L. Retore, Introduction to classical and quantum integrability , Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 55(17), 173001 (2022), doi:10.1088 /1751- 8121/ac5a8e, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2109.14280. 52 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    S. J. van Tongeren, Introduction to the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, J. Phys. A 49(32), 323005 (2016), doi:10.1088 /1751-8113/49/32/323005, https: //arxiv.org/abs/1606. 02951

    2016

  5. [5]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Separation of variables: New trends , Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 118, 35 (1995), doi:10.1143 /PTPS.118.35, https: //academic.oup.com/ ptps/article-pdf/doi/10.1143/PTPS.118.35/5199964/118-35.pdf

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.118.35/5199964/118-35.pdf 1995

  6. [6]

    Anharmonic oscillators, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, and nonlinear integral equations

    P . Dorey and R. Tateo, Anharmonic oscillators, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, and nonlinear integral equations , J. Phys. A 32, L419 (1999), doi:10.1088 /0305- 4470/32/38/102, https: //arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9812211

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Fioravanti and M

    D. Fioravanti and M. Rossi, On the origin of the correspondence between clas- sical and quantum integrable theories , Phys. Lett. B 838, 137706 (2023), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137706, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2106.07600

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137706 2023

  8. [8]

    Quantum spectral curve for AdS_5/CFT_4

    N. Gromov, V . Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin, Quantum Spectral Curve for Pla- nar N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(1), 011602 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.011602, https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.1939

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.011602 2014

  9. [9]

    Levkovich-Maslyuk, A review of the AdS /CFT Quantum Spectral Curve , J

    F . Levkovich-Maslyuk, A review of the AdS /CFT Quantum Spectral Curve , J. Phys. A 53(28), 283004 (2020), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab7137, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911. 13065

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab7137 2020

  10. [10]

    Boundary Perimeter Bethe Ansatz

    R. Frassek, Boundary Perimeter Bethe Ansatz , J. Phys. A 50(26), 265202 (2017), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa7278, https: //arxiv.org/abs/1703.10842

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa7278 2017

  11. [11]

    Belliard, N

    S. Belliard, N. A. Slavnov and B. Vallet, Modified Algebraic Bethe Ansatz: Twisted XXX Case, SIGMA 14, 054 (2018), doi:10.3842 /SIGMA.2018.054, https: //arxiv.org/abs/ 1804.00597

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Integrable Trotterization: Local Conservation Laws and Boundary Driving

    M. Vanicat, L. Zadnik and T . Prosen, Integrable Trotterization: Local Conser- vation Laws and Boundary Driving , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(3), 030606 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.030606, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00431

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.030606 2018

  13. [13]

    L. Sá, P . Ribeiro and T . Prosen, Integrable nonunitary open quantum circuits , Physical Review B 103(11), 115132 (2021), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevB.103.115132, https: //arxiv. org/abs/2011.06565

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Suzuki, Generalized Trotter’s Formula and Systematic Approximants of Exponential Operators and Inner Derivations with Applications to Many Body Problems , Commun

    M. Suzuki, Generalized Trotter’s Formula and Systematic Approximants of Exponential Operators and Inner Derivations with Applications to Many Body Problems , Commun. Math. Phys. 51, 183 (1976), doi:10.1007 /BF01609348

    1976

  15. [15]

    I. L. Aleiner, Bethe ansatz solutions for certain periodic quantum circuits , Annals of Physics 433, 168593 (2021), doi:10.1016 /j.aop.2021.168593, https: //arxiv.org/abs/ 2107.05715

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Morvan et al., Formation of robust bound states of interacting microwave photons , Nature 612(7939), 240 (2022), doi:10.1038 /s41586-022-05348-y, https: //arxiv.org/ abs/2206.05254

    A. Morvan et al., Formation of robust bound states of interacting microwave photons , Nature 612(7939), 240 (2022), doi:10.1038 /s41586-022-05348-y, https: //arxiv.org/ abs/2206.05254

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Maruyoshi, T

    K. Maruyoshi, T . Okuda, J. W . Pedersen, R. Suzuki, M. Yamazaki and Y. Yoshida,Conserved charges in the quantum simulation of integrable spin chains, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical 56(16), 165301 (2023), doi:10.1088 /1751-8121/acc369, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.00576. 53 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    W . Zhao, Y. Zhang, Y. Guo, Y. Cui, Z. Wang and R.-D. Zhu,Effective noise mitigation via quantum circuit learning in quantum simulation of integrable spin chains (2026), https: //arxiv.org/pdf/2604.27648

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Rosenberg and et al

    E. Rosenberg and et al. [Google Quantum A.I ], Dynamics of magnetization at infinite temperature in a heisenberg spin chain , Science 384 (2024) no.6691, adi7877 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adi7877, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2306.09333

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adi7877 2024

  20. [20]

    Y. Miao, V . Gritsev and D. V . Kurlov,The floquet baxterisation, SciPost Physics 16(3), 078 (2024), doi:10.21468 /SciPostPhys.16.3.078, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.15142

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Vernier, H.-C

    E. Vernier, H.-C. Yeh, L. Piroli and A. Mitra, Strong Zero Modes in Integrable Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(5), 050606 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.050606, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.050606 2024

  22. [22]

    Gehrmann and F

    S. Gehrmann and F . H. L. Essler, Exact strong zero modes in quantum circuits and spin chains with non-diagonal boundary conditions (2025), https: //arxiv.org/abs/2511. 05490

    2025

  23. [23]

    Hutsalyuk, Y

    A. Hutsalyuk, Y. Jiang, B. Pozsgay , H. Xu and Y. Zhang,Exact spin correlators of integrable quantum circuits from algebraic geometry (2024), https: //arxiv.org/abs/2405.16070

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    M. Lutz, L. Piroli, G. Styliaris and J. I. Cirac, Adiabatic quantum state preparation in integrable models, Quantum 10, 2032 (2026), doi:10.22331/q-2026-03-18-2032, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.21741

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2026-03-18-2032 2032

  25. [25]

    R. I. Nepomechie, Bethe ansatz on a quantum computer? , Quant. Inf. Comput. 21(34), 255 (2021), doi:10.26421 /qic21.3-4-4, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2010.01609

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Sopena, M

    A. Sopena, M. H. Gordon, D. García-Martín, G. Sierra and E. López, Algebraic Bethe Circuits, Quantum 6, 796 (2022), doi:10.22331 /q-2022-09-08-796, https: //arxiv.org/ abs/2202.04673

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    R. Ruiz, A. Sopena, E. López, G. Sierra and B. Pozsgay , Bethe Ansatz, quantum circuits, and the F-basis, SciPost Phys. 18(6), 187 (2025), doi:10.21468 /SciPostPhys.18.6.187, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02519

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Szász-Schagrin, D

    D. Szász-Schagrin, D. Cristani, L. Piroli and E. Vernier, Construction and simulability of quantum circuits with free fermions in disguise , Quantum Sci. Technol. 11(1), 015044 (2026), doi:10.1088 /2058-9565/ae390d, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2509.22585

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Fukai and B

    K. Fukai and B. Pozsgay ,Quantum circuits with free fermions in disguise, J. Phys. A58(17), 175202 (2025), doi:10.1088 /1751-8121/adcd18, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2402.02984

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Integrable Floquet dynamics, generalized exclusion processes and "fused" matrix ansatz

    M. Vanicat,Integrable Floquet dynamics, generalized exclusion processes and “fused” matrix ansatz, Nucl. Phys. B 929, 298 (2018), doi:10.1016 /j.nuclphysb.2018.02.007, https: //arxiv.org/abs/1711.08884

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Paletta, U

    C. Paletta, U. Duh, B. Pozsgay and L. Zadnik, Integrability and charge transport in asym- metric quantum-circuit geometries , J. Phys. A 58, 275001 (2025), doi:10.1088 /1751- 8121/ade483, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.04673

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    R. J. Baxter, Solvable eight vertex model on an arbitrary planar lattice , Phil. Trans. Roy . Soc. Lond. A 289, 315 (1978), doi:10.1098 /rsta.1978.0062, https: //inspirehep.net/ literature/139262. 54 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page arXiv 1978

  33. [33]

    Destri and H

    C. Destri and H. J. de Vega, Light Cone Lattice Approach to Fermionic Theories in 2- D: The Massive Thirring Model , Nucl. Phys. B 290, 363 (1987), doi:10.1016 /0550- 3213(87)90193-3, https: //inspirehep.net/literature/247388

    1987

  34. [34]

    Black Holes and Membranes in Higher Dimensional The- ories with Dilaton Fields

    C. Destri and H. J. de Vega, Bethe-Ansatz and quantum groups: The Light cone lattice ap- proach. 1. Six vertex and SOS models, Nucl. Phys. B 374, 692 (1992), doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(92)90405-Z

    work page doi:10.1016/0550- 1992

  35. [35]

    Paletta and T

    C. Paletta and T . Prosen,Integrability of open boundary driven quantum circuits, SciPost Phys. 18(1), 027 (2025), doi:10.21468 /SciPostPhys.18.1.027, https: //arxiv.org/abs/ 2406.12695

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Sklyanin, Boundary Conditions for Integrable Quantum Systems , J

    E. Sklyanin, Boundary Conditions for Integrable Quantum Systems , J. Phys. A 21, 2375 (1988), doi:10.1088 /0305-4470/21/10/015

    1988

  37. [37]

    Open XXZ spin chain: Nonequilibrium steady state and strict bound on ballistic transport

    T . Prosen, Open XXZ Spin Chain: Nonequilibrium Steady State and a Strict Bound on Ballistic Transport , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(21), 217206 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.217206, https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1350

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.217206 2011

  38. [38]

    Exterior integrability: Yang-Baxter form of nonequilibrium steady state density operator

    T . Prosen, E. Ilievski and V . Popkov, Exterior integrability: Yang-Baxter form of non-equilibrium steady-state density operator , New J. Physi. 15(7), 073051 (2013), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073051, https: //arxiv.org/abs/1304.7944

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073051 2013

  39. [39]

    Popkov and T

    V . Popkov and T . Prosen, Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of XXZ Circuits Bound- ary Driven with Arbitrary Resets or Fields , Phys. Rev. Lett. 135(7), 070401 (2025), doi:10.1103/31p7-lcgh, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2502.06731

    work page doi:10.1103/31p7-lcgh 2025

  40. [40]

    Paletta and T

    C. Paletta and T . Prosen,On the integrability structure of the deformed rule-54 reversible cellular automaton (2026), https: //arxiv.org/abs/2603.25424

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Exact nonequilibrium steady states of boundary driven circuit with XYZ gates

    X. Zhang, T . Prosen and V . Popkov,Exact nonequilibrium steady states of boundary driven circuit with XYZ gates (2026), 2605.17018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of an Open Hubbard Chain

    T . Prosen, Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of an Open Hubbard Chain , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 030603 (2014), doi:10.1103 /PhysRevLett.112.030603, https: //arxiv.org/ abs/1310.4420

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Infinitely dimensional Lax structure for one-dimensional Hubbard model

    V . Popkov and T . Prosen, Infinitely Dimensional Lax Structure for the One- Dimensional Hubbard Model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(12), 127201 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.127201, https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.02230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.127201 2015

  44. [44]

    Bensa and M

    J. Bensa and M. Žnidari ˇc, Fastest local entanglement scrambler, multistage thermaliza- tion, and a non-hermitian phantom , Physical Review X 11(3), 031019 (2021), https: //journals.aps.org/prx/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031019 2021

  45. [45]

    I. V . Cherednik,Factorizing Particles on a Half Line and Root Systems, Theor. Math. Phys. 61, 977 (1984), doi:10.1007 /BF01038545

    1984

  46. [46]

    H. J. de Vega and A. Gonzalez-Ruiz, Boundary K matrices for the XYZ, XXZ and XXX spin chains, J. Phys. A 27, 6129 (1994), doi:10.1088 /0305-4470/27/18/021, https: //arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  47. [47]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, A. Pribytok, A. L. Retore and P . Ryan, Classifying nearest- neighbour interactions and deformations of AdS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(3), 031604 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.031604, 2003.04332. 55 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.031604 2020

  48. [48]

    de Leeuw, C

    M. de Leeuw, C. Paletta, A. Pribytok, A. L. Retore and P . Ryan, Yang-Baxter and the Boost: splitting the difference , SciPost Physics 11(3), 069 (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.3.069, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11231

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.11.3.069 2021

  49. [49]

    M. G. Fernández, C. Paletta and A. L. Retore,Supplemental Material for the article ‘Open- boundary integrable quantum circuits with different geometries’ (2026), https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.20763606

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20763606 2026

  50. [50]

    Mezincescu and R

    L. Mezincescu and R. I. Nepomechie, Integrability of open spin chains with quantum alge- bra symmetry, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 6, 5231 (1991), doi:10.1142/S0217751X9200257X, [Addendum: Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 7, 5657–5659 (1992) ], https: //arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/ 9206047

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x9200257x 1991

  51. [51]

    Z. Bajnok, Equivalences between spin models induced by defects , Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006(06), P06010 (2006), doi:10.1088 /1742- 5468/2006/06/P06010, https: //arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0601107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    Open-chain transfer matrices for AdS/CFT

    R. Murgan and R. I. Nepomechie, Open-chain transfer matrices for AdS /CFT, JHEP 09, 085 (2008), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/085, https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2629

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/085 2008

  53. [53]

    A. De La Rosa Gomez, Symmetries of integrable open boundaries in the hubbard model and other spin chains, (PhD thesis (2017)), https: //etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/ 18795/1/Alejandro_de_la_Rosa_PhD_ThesisV4.pdf

    2017

  54. [54]

    Bielli, V

    D. Bielli, V . Moustakis and A. Torrielli,Boundary Bethe ansatz in massive AdS3, JHEP 10, 154 (2025), doi:10.1007 /JHEP10(2025)154, https: //arxiv.org/abs/2506.20133

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    De Leeuw, A

    M. De Leeuw, A. Pribytok and P . Ryan,Classifying two-dimensional integrable spin chains, J. Phys. A 52(50), 505201 (2019), doi:10.1088 /1751-8121/ab529f, https: //arxiv.org/ abs/1904.12005

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Ferrando, J

    G. Ferrando, J. Lamers, F . Levkovich-Maslyuk and D. Serban, Bethe Ansatz inside Calogero-Sutherland models , SciPost Phys. 18(1), 035 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.1.035, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16865

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.18.1.035 2025

  57. [57]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics , ISBN 978-0-486-46271-4, doi:10.1142/9789814415255_0002 (1982)

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814415255_0002 1982

  58. [58]

    Su and I

    L. Su and I. Martin, Integrable nonunitary quantum circuits, Physical Review B 106(13), 134312 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    M. T . Batchelor, V . Fridkin, A. Kuniba and Y. K. Zhou,Solutions of the reflection equation for face and vertex models associated with A(n)(1), B(n)(1), C(n)(1), D(n)(1) and A(n)(2) , Phys. Lett. B 376, 266 (1996), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00319-X, https://arxiv.org/ abs/hep-th/9601051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00319-x 1996

  60. [60]

    B_{n}^{(1)} and A_{2n}^{(2)}reflection K-matrices

    A. Lima-Santos, B(n)**(1)and A(2n)**(2) reflection K matrices, Nucl. Phys. B 654, 466 (2003), doi:10.1016 /S0550-3213(03)00042-7, https: //arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0210046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  61. [61]

    $C_{n}^{(1)}$, $D_{n}^{(1)}$ and $A_{2n-1}^{(2)}$ reflection K-matrices

    A. Lima-Santos and R. Malara, C**(1)(n), D**(1)(n) and A**(2)(2n-1) reflection K- matrices, Nucl. Phys. B 675, 661 (2003), doi:10.1016 /j.nuclphysb.2003.09.037, https: //arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0307046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  62. [62]

    On $A_{n-1}^{(1)},B_{n}^{(1)}, C_{n}^{(1)}, D_{n}^{(1)},A_{2n}^{(2)}, A_{2n-1}^{(2)}$ and $D_{n+1}^{(2)}$ Reflection $K$-Matrices

    R. Malara and A. Lima-Santos, On A(n-1)(1), B(n)(1), C(n)(1), D(n)(1), A(2n)(2), A(2n-1)(2) and D(n +1)(2) reflection K-matrices, J. Stat. Mech. 0609, P09013 (2006), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/09/P09013, https: //arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0412058. 56 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/09/p09013 2006

  63. [63]

    Boundary S-Matrix and Boundary State in Two-Dimensional Integrable Quantum Field Theory

    S. Ghoshal and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Boundary S matrix and boundary state in two- dimensional integrable quantum field theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 3841 (1994), doi:10.1142/S0217751X94001552, [Erratum: Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 9, 4353 (1994)], https: //arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x94001552 1994

  64. [64]

    R. I. Nepomechie and R. A. Pimenta,New D(2) n+1 K-matrices with quantum group symmetry, J. Phys. A 51(39), 39LT02 (2018), doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aad957, https://arxiv.org/ abs/1805.10144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aad957 2018

  65. [65]

    Yangian symmetry and bound states in AdS/CFT boundary scattering

    C. Ahn and R. I. Nepomechie, Yangian symmetry and bound states in AdS/CFT boundary scattering, JHEP 05, 016 (2010), doi:10.1007 /JHEP05(2010)016, https: //arxiv.org/ pdf/1003.3361

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    de Leeuw and V

    M. de Leeuw and V . Regelskis,Integrable boundaries in AdS/CFT: revisiting the Z=0 giant graviton and D7-brane, JHEP 03, 030 (2013), doi:10.1007 /JHEP03(2013)030, 1206. 4704

    2013

  67. [67]

    Bielli, V

    D. Bielli, V . Gautam, V . Moustakis, A. Prinsloo and A. Torrielli, Boundary scattering in massless AdS3, JHEP 07, 266 (2024), doi:10.1007 /JHEP07(2024)266, https: //arxiv. org/abs/2403.18594

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    J. C. Gil and S. Driezen, Analytic approach to boundary integrability with application to mixed-flux AdS3 × S3 (2026), 2601.09935

    work page arXiv 2026

  69. [69]

    Eigenvectors of open XXZ and ASEP models for a class of non-diagonal boundary conditions

    N. Crampe, E. Ragoucy and D. Simon, Eigenvectors of open XXZ and ASEP models for a class of non-diagonal boundary conditions , J. Stat. Mech. 1011, P11038 (2010), doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/11/P11038, https: //arxiv.org/abs/1009.4119

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2010/11/p11038 2010

  70. [70]

    Frassek, The non-compact XXZ spin chain as stochastic particle process , J

    R. Frassek, The non-compact XXZ spin chain as stochastic particle process , J. Phys. A 52(33), 335202 (2019), doi:10.1088 /1751-8121/ab2fb1, https: //arxiv.org/abs/1904. 02191

    2019

  71. [71]

    Frahm and S

    H. Frahm and S. Gehrmann, Integrable boundary conditions for staggered vertex models , J. Phys. A 56(2), 025001 (2023), doi:10.1088 /1751-8121/acb29f, https: //arxiv.org/ abs/2209.06182

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Gombor and A

    T . Gombor and A. Holguin,Boundary integrability from the fuzzy three sphere, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140078 (2026), doi:10.1016 /j.physletb.2025.140078, 2510.27463

    work page arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    R. S. Vieira, Solving and classifying the solutions of the Yang-Baxter equa- tion through a differential approach. Two-state systems , JHEP 10, 110 (2018), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)110, https: //arxiv.org/abs/1712.02341

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2018)110 2018

  74. [74]

    Inami and H

    T . Inami and H. Konno, Integrable XYZ spin chain with boundaries , J. Phys. A 27, L913 (1994), doi:10.1088 /0305-4470/27/24/002, hep-th /9409138

    1994

  75. [75]

    Pasquier and H

    V . Pasquier and H. Saleur,Common Structures Between Finite Systems and Conformal Field Theories Through Quantum Groups, Nucl. Phys. B 330, 523 (1990), doi:10.1016 /0550- 3213(90)90122-T

    1990

  76. [76]

    Fan, B.-y

    H. Fan, B.-y . Hou, K.-j. Shi and Z.-x. Yang, Algebraic Bethe ansatz for eight ver- tex model with general open boundary conditions , Nucl. Phys. B 478, 723 (1996), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00398-7, hep-th /9604016

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00398-7 1996

  77. [77]

    R. I. Nepomechie, Bethe ansatz solution of the open XXZ chain with nondiagonal boundary terms, J. Phys. A 37, 433 (2004), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/2/012, hep-th/0304092. 57 SciPost Physics Submission

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/2/012 2004

  78. [78]

    Separation of Variables in the open XXX chain

    H. Frahm, A. Seel and T . Wirth,Separation of Variables in the open XXX chain, Nucl. Phys. B 802, 351 (2008), doi:10.1016 /j.nuclphysb.2008.04.008, 0803.1776

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  79. [79]

    Complete spectrum and scalar products for the open spin-1/2 XXZ quantum chains with non-diagonal boundary terms

    S. Faldella, N. Kitanine and G. Niccoli, The complete spectrum and scalar products for the open spin-1/2 XXZ quantum chains with non-diagonal boundary terms, J. Stat. Mech. 1401(1), P01011 (2014), doi:10.1088 /1742-5468/2014/01/P01011, 1307.3960. 58

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014