Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 94 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

Quantum groups map the genetic code's structure

2026-07-07 22:37 UTC pith:XYPE7HES

load-bearing objection Festschrift survey with no new results; the genetic code model is the only distinctive element but is previously published. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.05225 v1 pith:XYPE7HES submitted 2026-07-06 hep-th math-phmath.MP

A Century of Group Theory in Particle Physics and Beyond

Paul Sorba This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords group theoryquantum groupsgenetic codecrystal basissymmetryparticle physicsconformal field theorysupersymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper surveys a century of group theory in physics, from the Poincare group through gauge theories and supersymmetry to conformal field theory and integrable models. Its most distinctive claim is that the quantum group U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0 provides a natural algebraic framework for the genetic code. The four nucleotides (A, C, G, U/T) are assigned to the (1/2, 1/2) representation of this quantum group. Because the crystal basis at q=0 produces ordered tensor products rather than symmetrized linear combinations, three-fold tensor products of nucleotide states yield the 64 codons in a way that respects their order — a feature essential to genetics but absent in ordinary quark classification. The decomposition produces irreducible representations whose codon content can be compared with biological data. The model generates sum rules for codon usage probabilities, a codon-anticodon interaction potential analogous to spin-spin interactions in particle physics, and predictions for amino-acid thermodynamic parameters. The interaction potential, when minimized, reproduces the observed set of 22 anticodons in animal mitochondrial code and yields inequalities for codon usage frequencies consistent with data across species.

Core claim

The central mechanism is the crystal basis of U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0, which enforces ordered tensor products of representation states. This ordering property — absent in ordinary Lie algebra representations where states symmetrize — matches the biological requirement that codons are ordered triples of nucleotides. By assigning the four nucleotides to the four states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation, the three-fold tensor product naturally produces all 64 codons distributed across irreducible representations whose structure encodes degeneracy patterns of the genetic code. The two Sl(2) factors correspond to two 'biological spins' capturing the purine/pyrimidine and complementary-base-pairing

What carries the argument

crystal basis of U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that assigning the four nucleotides to the four states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0 captures biologically meaningful structure, but the biological justification for this specific assignment rests on analogy with quark classification rather than independent biological reasoning.

What would settle it

If the predicted species-independent sum rules for codon usage fail to hold across a broad sample of vertebrate genomes, or if the minimized interaction potential fails to reproduce observed anticodon sets in genetic code variants not used in calibrating the model, the algebraic framework would lack predictive power beyond formal relabeling.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The codon-anticodon interaction potential, when minimized, reproduces the observed 22-anticodon set of animal mitochondrial code and predicts anticodon structures for Ancient, Archetypal, and Early genetic codes.
  • Sum rules for codon usage probabilities are derived: the sum of usage probabilities of codons with C and A in the third position for quartets and sextets is predicted to be species-independent for vertebrates.
  • The model predicts thermodynamic parameters for amino acids not yet experimentally measured.
  • The framework connects the degeneracy structure of the genetic code to the representation theory of quantum groups, suggesting that algebraic constraints may underlie biological regularities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the crystal basis ordering is genuinely capturing biological structure rather than relabeling it, one could test the model's predicted sum rules and anticodon hierarchies against expanded genomic databases across more species and genetic code variants.
  • The two-parameter interaction potential and its coherent sign change between Early and Eukaryotic codes could be tested by examining whether the same parameter shift reproduces known intermediate or variant genetic codes beyond those already analyzed.
  • The analogy between codon-anticodon interactions and spin-spin interactions suggests that experimental measurements of codon-anticodon binding energies could be compared quantitatively against the model's potential, providing an independent physical test of the algebraic assignment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This is a proceedings contribution surveying the development and impact of group theory in physics over roughly the past century, presented at a conference honoring Branko Dragovich's 80th birthday. The paper covers space-time symmetries (Section 2: Poincaré group and its contractions/extensions), hadronic spectroscopy (Section 3: SU(3) flavor and color, multiquark states), gauge theories and supersymmetry (Section 4), two-dimensional conformal field theory and integrable models (Section 5), generalized symmetries (Section 6), and an application of quantum groups to the genetic code (Section 7). The survey sections are pedagogical in nature and cover well-established material, while Section 7 presents the author's own research program applying the crystal basis of U_{q=0}(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) to the genetic code.

Significance. The paper serves as a broad pedagogical overview suitable for a proceedings volume. The survey sections (2–6) are mathematically sound at the level of a review talk and correctly report standard commutation relations, group structures, and historical milestones. Section 7 is the most distinctive contribution, presenting a parameter-free algebraic framework (the crystal basis model) for the genetic code with falsifiable predictions (sum rules for codon usage, anticodon structure predictions). The model's predictions are compared to biological data in referenced prior work [92, 94, 95]. The nucleotide-to-representation assignment is explicitly stated as an assumption, which is appropriate for a survey of an ongoing research program.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 7, paragraph beginning 'In our model that we called the Crystal Basis Model': the statement that 'the four nucleotides as basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of the U_q(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) quantum enveloping algebra in the limit q=0 [90]' cites reference [90], which is Schrödinger's 1944 book 'What is life?'. This is a misattribution; the crystal basis model originates in the author's own work [92] (Frappat, Sciarrino, Sorba, 1998). This reference error is load-bearing because it obscures the origin of the central construction of Section 7 and should be corrected.
  2. Section 7: the claims of 'almost universal' behaviour of codon usage frequencies and 'very good agreement' with observed anticodons are stated without any supporting data, tables, or quantitative comparison in this manuscript. While these results are referenced to prior work [94, 95], the strength of the language ('very good agreement', 'almost universal') is not substantiated within the paper itself. For a proceedings survey this may be acceptable, but a brief quantitative summary or a single comparison table would materially strengthen the case that the quantum group structure is doing non-trivial work beyond a relabeling of the four nucleotide states.
minor comments (7)
  1. Section 2, BMS/Witt algebra commutation relations: '[l′_n, l′_n] = (m−n)l′_{m+n}' should read '[l′_m, l′_n] = (m−n)l′_{m+n}' (subscript mismatch on the left-hand side).
  2. Section 2, Table 1 caption and surrounding text: the contraction arrows in the text diagram (c→0 and c→∞) are placed beneath the Carroll and Galilean labels but the directionality (which limit gives which algebra) could be clearer; the table itself lists 'Carroll' on the left and 'Galilean' on the right, which is consistent but the reader must cross-check carefully.
  3. Section 4: 'I representing the identity generator of the U(1) Lie algebra' — the notation 'I.eA_μ' in the covariant derivative is unusual; standard notation would use 'e' (the coupling) rather than 'I.e'. Clarify whether 'I' here is the identity or a typo.
  4. Section 5, Virasoro algebra: the commutation relations are written with [L_m, L_n] and [L′_m, L′_n] but the prime notation for the second (anti-holomorphic) copy is introduced without explicit comment; a brief note would help the reader.
  5. Section 7: the biological spin structure diagram uses '↔' for horizontal (Sl(2)_H) and '↕' for vertical (Sl(2)_V) assignments, but the arrows for C↔U and G↔A are labeled with Sl(2)_V on both sides, which is confusing. The diagram would benefit from clearer labeling of which algebra acts along which axis.
  6. Throughout: numerous minor typographical issues (e.g., 'extenr sions' in Section 1, 'Had that a part of their success' in Section 1, 'disgarded' in Section 6, 'to coloured clusters' in Section 3). A careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  7. Reference list: several arXiv identifiers have formatting inconsistencies (e.g., 'hep/th' vs 'hep-th', missing version numbers, extra spaces). Standardize the format.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying two issues in Section 7, both of which are well-taken. We address them in turn below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section 7, paragraph beginning 'In our model that we called the Crystal Basis Model': the statement that 'the four nucleotides as basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of the U_q(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) quantum enveloping algebra in the limit q=0 [90]' cites reference [90], which is Schrödinger's 1944 book 'What is life?'. This is a misattribution; the crystal basis model originates in the author's own work [92].

    Authors: The referee is entirely correct. Reference [90] (Schrödinger's 'What is life?') is cited in the preceding paragraph as the historical motivation for applying physics to biology, and was inadvertently carried over as the citation for the crystal basis construction. The correct reference for the statement that the four nucleotides are basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of U_{q=0}(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) is [92] (Frappat, Sciarrino, Sorba, 1998). We will correct this citation in the revised manuscript. We thank the referee for catching this error. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Section 7: the claims of 'almost universal' behaviour of codon usage frequencies and 'very good agreement' with observed anticodons are stated without any supporting data, tables, or quantitative comparison in this manuscript. A brief quantitative summary or a single comparison table would materially strengthen the case.

    Authors: The referee raises a legitimate point. The phrases 'almost universal' and 'very good agreement' refer to results established in [94, 95], but the current manuscript does not include any quantitative material to substantiate them within its own pages. We agree that a proceedings survey making such claims should provide at least a minimal quantitative anchor. In the revised version, we will add a compact table comparing the predicted anticodon set for the animal mitochondrial code with the observed set, as well as a brief summary of the codon usage sum rules with representative numerical values from the data analyzed in [95]. This will allow the reader to assess the non-triviality of the quantum group framework without needing to consult the referenced papers. We note that a full quantitative treatment is beyond the scope of a proceedings contribution, but the additions we propose will address the referee's concern adequately. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Survey paper with self-citations to author's own prior work for the genetic code model; no circularity in the derivation chain itself.

full rationale

This is a proceedings survey paper covering a century of group theory in physics. Sections 2-6 present standard, well-established results (Poincaré group, gauge theories, supersymmetry, conformal field theory, generalized symmetries) with citations to the broader literature. The only section with substantive original claims is Section 7, which presents the 'Crystal Basis Model' for the genetic code. There, the nucleotide-to-representation assignment is explicitly stated as an assumption ('we will assume the following biological spin structure'), not a derived result, so there is no self-definitional circularity. The downstream results (sum rules, codon-anticodon interaction potential, anticodon structure predictions) are attributed to the author's prior work (refs [92], [94], [95]) and are said to be compared against experimental data in those publications. The two parameters in the interaction potential are fitted, but the paper does not claim their values as predictions — it analyzes their sign change across evolutionary codes. The self-citations to [92], [94], [95] are load-bearing for the genetic code model's substantive claims, but these are prior published works, not unverified assertions invoked to close a logical loop within this paper. The framework's assumptions (quantum group assignment) are interpretive premises, not circular definitions. No step in the paper's derivation chain reduces to its inputs by construction. The minor self-citation pattern is normal for a survey of one's own research program and does not constitute circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper is primarily a survey, so most content draws on standard mathematical axioms. The genetic code model section introduces one ad hoc modeling choice (nucleotide-to-representation assignment) and two fitted parameters in the interaction potential, all from prior published work.

free parameters (1)
  • Two parameters in codon-anticodon interaction potential = Not explicitly stated in this paper; referenced to prior work [94]
    Section 7 mentions 'an analysis of the coherent change of sign, in the evolution from the Early to the Eukaryotic code, of the two parameters regulating our interaction potential.' These parameters are fitted to biological data in the referenced prior publications.
axioms (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The four nucleotides A, C, G, T/U are basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of U_q(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) at q=0
    Section 7: 'the four nucleotides as basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation... we will assume the following biological spin structure.' This assignment is a modeling choice, not derived from biological first principles.
  • standard math Standard mathematical structures: Poincaré group, Lie algebra classification, Virasoro algebra, Kac-Moody algebras, quantum groups
    Sections 2–6 rely on well-established mathematical frameworks from the cited literature.
  • domain assumption Codons are ordered triples of nucleotides (unlike baryons which are symmetrized)
    Section 7: 'the main and essential difference stands in the property of a codon to be an ordered set of three nucleotides.' This biological fact motivates the use of crystal basis representations.
invented entities (1)
  • Biological spin structure (Sl(2)_H and Sl(2)_V quantum numbers assigned to nucleotides) no independent evidence
    purpose: To algebraically represent the complementary rule and purine/pyrimidine distinction in DNA
    The assignment maps biological properties onto quantum numbers, but the paper provides no independent experimental evidence that this algebraic structure reflects a physical mechanism in molecular biology. Validation is limited to fitting codon usage data and anticodon structures.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 28655 in / 2521 out tokens · 169031 ms · 2026-07-07T22:37:47.598046+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The development of Group Theory in Mathematics as well as its impact in Physics has been spectacular during the twentieth century, and more particularly these last fifty years. If its contribution to Particle Physics deserves a special consideration, its usefulness cannot be neglected in other domains like Statistical Physics for example, and might also be of interest in Theoretical Biology. Some of these aspects will be examined.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Introduction to Exceptional Lie groups and Algebras

    P. Ramond, “Introduction to Exceptional Lie groups and Algebras” CALT-68-577

    work page

  2. [2]

    Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e

    J.M. Levy-Leblond, “Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e” Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e, 2 (1965) 1

    work page 1965

  3. [3]

    Carroll Structures, Null Geometry and Conformal Isometries

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, C. Marteau and P.M. Petropoulos, “Carroll Structures, Null Ge- ometry and Conformal Theories”, arXiv: hep-th/1905.02221; N. Athanasiou, P.M. Petropoulos, S. M. Schulz and G. Taujanskas “One dimensional Carrollian fluids. Part 1.Carroll-Galilei duality” arXiv: hep/th 2407. 05962, ibid “One-dimensional Carrollian fluids II: C1 blo...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  4. [4]

    Dictionary on Lie algebras and Superalgebras

    L. Frappat, A. Sciarrino and P. Sorba, “Dictionary on Lie algebras and Superalgebras”, Academic Press (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    Juan M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Super gravity”, arXiv: hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals

    O. Aharoni, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, J. Maldacena, “N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons- matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals”, arXiv : hep/th: 0806.1218

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics

    P.K. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets, “Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics”, arXiv: hep/th: 0405231

    work page

  8. [8]

    ”Strange and stringy”

    Sachdev, Subir (2013). ”Strange and stringy”. Scientific American. 308 (44): 44–51

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from antisymmetric isolated systems

    H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from antisymmetric isolated systems” Proc.Roy.Soc. Lond. A269 (1962) 21- 52; R.K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity.8.Waves in asymptotically flat space- times”, Proc.Roy.Soc. Lond. A270 (1962) 103-126; id.“Asymptotic symmetries in gravi...

    work page 1962

  10. [10]

    On the Various Extensions of the BMS Group

    R. Ruzziconi, “On the various extensions of the BMS group” Thesis, Bruxelles (2020) hep-th: 2009.01926

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited

    G. Barnich and C. Trossaert, “Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4-dimensional space-times at null infinities revisited” Phys.Rev.Lett.105 (2010)111103, hep-th: 0909.2617; “Supertransla- tions call for superrotations”hep-th: 1102-4632, and references therein

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional field theory

    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional field theory” Nucl.Phys. B241, 333 (1984)

    work page 1984

  13. [13]

    Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, “Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symme- try” hep-th: 1402.5894

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Conformal Carroll groups

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, “Conformal Carroll groups” hep-th: 1403.4213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    The Maximal Kinematical invariance Group of the Free Schr¨ odinger Equation

    U. Niederer, “The Maximal Kinematical invariance Group of the Free Schr¨ odinger Equation” 22 Helv.Phys.Acta, 45 (1972) 802

    work page 1972

  16. [16]

    About the Non-relativistic structure of the Conformal algebra

    G. Burdet, M. Perrin and P. Sorba, “About the Non-relativistic structure of the Conformal algebra” Comm.Math.Phys. 34 (1973) 85

    work page 1973

  17. [17]

    Schr¨ odinger invariance and strongly anisotropic critical systems

    M. Henkel, “Schr¨ odinger invariance and strongly anisotropic critical systems” J.Stat.Phys.75 (1994) 1023-1061

    work page 1994

  18. [18]

    Phenomenology of local scale invariance:from conformal invariance to dynam- ical scaling

    M. Henkel, “Phenomenology of local scale invariance:from conformal invariance to dynam- ical scaling”, Nucl.Phys. B 641 (2002) 405-486; “Ageing, dynamical scaling and conformal invariance”, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A 19 (2004) 2207-2216

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Schr\"odinger symmetry: a historical review

    C. Duval, M. Henkel, P.A. Horvathy, S. Rouhani and P.M. Zhang, “Schr¨ odinger Symmetry : an historical review”, arXiv: 2403.20316v3 hep-th/ 19 May 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Comments on string theory backgrounds with non-relativistic conformal symmetry

    Juan Maldacena, Dario Martelli and Yuji Tachikawa, “Comments on string theory back- grounds with non relativistic conformal symmetry”, arXiv: hep-th/0807.1100

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Lectures on holographic methods for condensed matter physics

    Sean Hartnoll,“Lectures on Holographic methods for Condensed Matter Physics”, arXiv: hep-th/0903.3246 V3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Nonrelativistic conformal field theories

    Y. Nishida and D.T. Son, “Non relativistic conformal field theories“ arXiv : 0706.3746 ; D.T. Son “Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence”arXiv: hep-th/0804.3972

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Galilean Conformal Algebras and AdS/CFT

    A. Bagchi and R. Gopakumar,“Galilean conformal algebras and AdS/CFT”arXiv: hep/th 0902.1385V3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Schr\"odinger Manifolds

    C. Duval and S. Lazzarini, “Schr¨ odinger manifolds”math-ph: 1201.0683

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    A non-lorentzian primer

    E.A. Bergshoeff, J.M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and J. Gomis, “A Non-Lorentzian Primer”hep-th: 2206.12177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    The Eightfold Way

    see M. Gell-Mann and Y. Ne’eman “The Eightfold Way”, W.A. Benjamin, New-York, 1964

    work page 1964

  27. [27]

    A schematic model of Baryons and Mesons

    M. Gell-Mann, “A schematic model of Baryons and Mesons”, Phys.Lett.8 (3) 214-215 ; G. Zweig, “An SU(3) model for Strong Interaction Symmetry and its Breaking” CERN-TH-401 and CERN-TH-412

    work page

  28. [28]

    Three-Triplet with double SU(3) Symmetry

    M.Y. Han and Y. Nambu,“Three-Triplet with double SU(3) Symmetry”Phys.rev.B139 (4B) :1006 (1965)

    work page 1965

  29. [29]

    Advantages of the Color octet gluon picture

    H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann and H. Leutwyler, “Advantages of the Color octet gluon picture”, Phys.Lett.B47 (4), 365-368 (1973)

    work page 1973

  30. [30]

    On Quarks and Flavour Symmetry

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “On Quarks and Flavour Symmetry”, hep-th: 0711.3157

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Multiquark Hadrons 1, The Phenomenology of q2q*2 Mesons

    R.J. Jaffe, “Multiquark Hadrons 1, The Phenomenology of q2q*2 Mesons”Phys.Lett.D15 (1977) 267; id. “Multiquark Hadrons 2. Methods”, Phys.Rev.D15 (1977) 281

    work page 1977

  32. [32]

    Is deuteron a six quark system?

    V.A. Matveev and P. Sorba, “Is deuteron a six quark system?” Lett.Nuovo Cim.20 (1977) 435

    work page 1977

  33. [33]

    Quark analysis of multibaryonic systems

    V.A. Matveev and P. Sorba “Quark analysis of multibaryonic systems” Nuovo Cim.A45, 257 (1978); H. Hogaasen, P. Sorba and R. Viollier, Z. Physik C4, 131 (1980)

    work page 1978

  34. [34]

    Color structure of deuteron on the light front

    S. Kaur, J. Wu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J.P. Vary,“Color structure of deuteron on the light front” hep-th :2503.21371; S. Kaur, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, C.-R. Ji, “Structure of lightest nuclei in the visible Universe” hep-th :2507.09886

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Baryonium states in multiquark spectroscopy

    H.-M. Chan and H. Hogaasen,“Baryonium states in multiquark spectroscopy”,Phys. Lett.B72 (1977) 121; id. “A model for baryonium”, Phys.Lett. B136 (1978) 634

    work page 1977

  36. [36]

    The systematic of possibly narrow states with baryon number 23 one

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “The systematic of possibly narrow states with baryon number 23 one”Nucl.Phys.B145 (1978) 119; M. De Combrugghe, H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “Narrow multiquark baryons”, Nuclear Phys.B156 (1979), 261

    work page 1978

  37. [37]

    What is happening to multiquark baryons?

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “What is happening to multiquark baryons?” Proc.of the 4th Intern.Conf. on Baryon resonances “ (1980),p.401, Toronto, Canada

    work page 1980

  38. [38]

    Hadron masses in a gauge theory

    A. de Rujula, H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, “Hadron masses in a gauge theory” Phys.Rev. D12 (1975) 147

    work page 1975

  39. [39]

    Possibility of stable multiquark baryons

    C. Gignoux, B. Sylvestre-Brac and J.M. Richard, “Possibility of stable multiquark baryons”, Phys.Lett.B193 (1987) 323

    work page 1987

  40. [40]

    On the discrete charm of multiquark states

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “On the discrete charm of multiquark states” July 2020, unpub- lished

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Observable (?) cosmological signatures of superstrings in pre-big bang models of inflation

    H. Hogaasen, J.M. Richard and P. Sorba, “A chromomagnetic mechanism for the X(3872) resonance”,hep-th/0511039; [B&H&R&S]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Chromomagnetism, flavour sym- metry breaking and S-wave tetraquarks

    F. Buccella, H. Hogaasen, J.M. Richard and P. Sorba, “Chromomagnetism, flavour sym- metry breaking and S-wave tetraquarks”, hep-th/ 0608001

    work page

  43. [43]

    Observation of $J/\psi p$ resonances consistent with pentaquark states in ${\Lambda_b^0\to J/\psi K^-p}$ decays

    LHCb Collab., R. Aaij et al , hep-ex/1507.03414

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Aaij et al , hep-ex/ 2006.16957

    LHCb Collab., R. Aaij et al , hep-ex/ 2006.16957

    work page arXiv 2006

  45. [45]

    b decays: a factory for hidden charm multiquark states

    F. Buccella“b decays: a factory for hidden charm multiquark states” hep-th/ 1801.03723

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance

    C.N. Yang and R. Mills, “Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance”, Phys.Rev.96 (1954) 19

    work page 1954

  47. [47]

    A model of Leptons

    S. Glashow ”The renormalizability of vector meson interactions”, Nucl. Phys. 10, 107 (1959); A.Salam, in Elementary Particle Theory, ed.N.Swartholm (Almquist and Forlag,Stockholm, 1968; S. Weinberg,“A model of Leptons”, Phys. Rev. Letters 19 (21): 1264–66

    work page 1959

  48. [48]

    Broken symmetries and the mass of the Gauge Bosons

    P.W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries and the mass of the Gauge Bosons” Phys.Rev.Lett. 12 (1964) 132; F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons”, Phys.Rev.Letters, 13 (1964) 321

    work page 1964

  49. [49]

    Neveu and Schwarz, Nucl.Phys.B31(1971) 86; P

    A. Neveu and Schwarz, Nucl.Phys.B31(1971) 86; P. Ramond, Phys.Rev.D3 (1971) 2415; Y. Aharonov, A. Casher and L. Susskind, Phys.Lett.B35 (1971) 512; J.L. Gervais and B. Sakita, Nucl.Phys.B34 (1971) 633

    work page 1971

  50. [50]

    Supergauge transformations in four dimensions

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,“Supergauge transformations in four dimensions”Nucl.phys.B70 (1974) 39

    work page 1974

  51. [51]

    All possible symmetries of the S-matrix

    S. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All possible symmetries of the S-matrix”,Phys.rev. 159 (1967) 1251

    work page 1967

  52. [52]

    Extension of the algebra of the Poincar´ e group gen- erators and violation of P invariance

    Yu.A. Golfand and E.P. Likhtmann, “Extension of the algebra of the Poincar´ e group gen- erators and violation of P invariance”, JETP Lett.13 (1971) 323

    work page 1971

  53. [53]

    All possible generators of supersymmetries of the S-Matrix

    R. Haag, J.T. Lopuszanski, M.F. Sohnius “All possible generators of supersymmetries of the S-Matrix”, Nucl.Phys.B88 (1975) 257

    work page 1975

  54. [54]

    Supersymmetry

    P. Fayet and S. Ferrara, “Supersymmetry”,Phys.Reports 32C (1977) 249

    work page 1977

  55. [55]

    Introducing Supersymmetry

    M.F. Sohnius, “Introducing Supersymmetry”, Phys.Reports 128 (1985) 39

    work page 1985

  56. [56]

    Harmonic superspace

    A.S. Galperin, E.A. Ivanov, V.I. Ogievetsky and E.S. Sokatchev,“Harmonic superspace” (2001) Cambridge University Press, p.306

    work page 2001

  57. [57]

    Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino

    P. Fayet, “Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino”Nucl.Phys. B90 (1975) 104-124 24

    work page 1975

  58. [58]

    Fermi-Bose-Hypersymmetry

    P. Fayet, “Fermi-Bose-Hypersymmetry”Nucl.Phys.B113(1976) 135 P. Fayet, “Spontaneous generation of massive multiplets and central charges in extended supersymmetric theories” Nucl. Phys. B149 (1979) 137-169

    work page 1976

  59. [59]

    Supersymmetry and Supergravity

    J. Wess and J. Bagger, “Supersymmetry and Supergravity”, Princeton University Press, 1992

    work page 1992

  60. [60]

    Classification of Lie Superalgebras

    V. Kac, “Classification of Lie Superalgebras”, Funct. Anal. Appl. 9(1975)263; “Lie Superalgebras”, Adv.Math.Phys. 26(1977)8; “A sketch on Lie Superalgebra theory”, Comm. Math.Phys.53 (1977) 31; “Characters of typical representations of classical Lie Superalgebras”, Comm. Math.Phys.5(1977) 889; “Representations of classical Lie Superalgebras”,Lecture Notes...

    work page 1975

  61. [61]

    Symmetries in Modern Physics

    E. D’Hoker and P. Sorba, “Symmetries in Modern Physics” in preparation

    work page

  62. [62]

    Maximally supersymmetric solutions of ten- and eleven-dimensional supergravities

    P.G.O. Freund and M.A. Rubin, “Dynamics of Dimensional Reduction” Phys.Lett. B97, (1980) 233; L.J. Romans, “New compactification of chiral N=2 D=10 Supergravity”, Phys.Lett.B153 (1985) 392; J. Figueroa-O’Farrill and G. Papadopoulos, “Maximally supersymmetric solutions of ten and eleven dimensional supergravities”, hep-th/0211089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1980

  63. [63]

    String theory and M-theory: a modern introduction

    K. Becker, M. Becker and J. Schwarz, “String theory and M-theory: a modern introduction”, Cambridge (2007)

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the ADS/CFT Cor- respondence

    E. D’Hoker and D.Z. Freedman,“Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the ADS/CFT Cor- respondence”, hep-th / 0201253

    work page

  65. [65]

    Dark energy from String Theory: an introductory review

    D. Andriot,“Dark energy from String Theory: an introductory review”hep-th/2603.2579

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Anomaly cancellations in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory

    M.B. Green and J. Schwarz, “Anomaly cancellations in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory” Phys. Lett. 149 (1984) 11

    work page 1984

  67. [67]

    Witten, “String theories dynamics in various dimensions“ hep-th/ 9503124

    Ed. Witten, “String theories dynamics in various dimensions“ hep-th/ 9503124

    work page

  68. [68]

    Conformal Field Theory

    Ph. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, “Conformal Field Theory”, Springer (1997)

    work page 1997

  69. [69]

    Modular invariant partition functions in two di- mensions

    A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, “Modular invariant partition functions in two di- mensions”, Nucl.Phys.B280 (1987) 445; “The A-D-E classification of minimal and A1(1)conformal invariant theories”,Comm.Math.Phys.13 (1987) 1

    work page 1987

  70. [70]

    Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in relation to Quantum Physics

    P. Goddard and D. Olive, “Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in relation to Quantum Physics”, Int.Journ.of Mod.Phys.A, Vol.1, No 2 (1986) 303-414[71] D. Lust and S. Theisen, “Lectures on String Theory”, Lecture Notes in Physics 346 (1989) Springer-Verlag

    work page 1986

  71. [71]

    Current Algebra and Wess-Zumino models in two dimensions

    Ed. Witten,”Non Abelian Bosonisation in two dimensions” Comm.Math.Phys.92 (1984) 455; V.G. Knizhnik and A.B. Zamolodchikov, “Current Algebra and Wess-Zumino models in two dimensions”Nucl.Phys. B247 (1984) 83; D. Gepner and E. Witten, “String Theory on Group Manifolds” Nucl.Phys.B278 (1986) 493”

    work page 1984

  72. [72]

    Structure of basic superalgebras and of their affine extensions

    L. Frappat, A. Sciarrino and P. Sorba,“Structure of basic superalgebras and of their affine extensions”, Comm.Math.Phys.121 (1989) 457

    work page 1989

  73. [73]

    Extended Kac-Moody algebras and applications

    E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba,“Extended Kac-Moody algebras and applications”, Intern.Journ.of Mod.Phys.A ,Vol7, No13 (1992) 2883-2971

    work page 1992

  74. [74]

    New perspectives in Kac-Moody algebras associated to higher dimensional manifolds

    R. Campoamor-Stursberg, A. Marrani and M. Rausch de Traubenberg, “New perspectives in Kac-Moody algebras associated to higher dimensional manifolds” , hep-th/2510.02953 and ref.therein

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    Exactly and Completely Integrable Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

    A.N. Leznov and M.V. Saveliev,“Exactly and Completely Integrable Nonlinear Dynamical Systems”, Acta Appl.Math.116 (1989) and ref. therein 25

    work page 1989

  76. [76]

    Feher, L

    L. Feher, L. O’Raifeartaigh, P. Ruelle, I. Tsutsui and A. Wipf,”On Hamiltonian reduction of the Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten theories”Phys.Rep. 222 (1992)1, and ref.therein

    work page 1992

  77. [77]

    General properties of Classical W alge- bras

    F. Delduc, L. Frappat, E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba,“General properties of Classical W alge- bras”, hep-th/931204

    work page

  78. [78]

    Representations of zero curvature for the system of non- linear partial differential equationsx α,zz =exp(kx) α and its integrability

    A.N. Leznov and M.V. Saveliev,“Representations of zero curvature for the system of non- linear partial differential equationsx α,zz =exp(kx) α and its integrability”, Lett.Math.Phys.3 (1979) 485

    work page 1979

  79. [79]

    Lectures on Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory and Integrable Systems

    E. D’Hoker and D.H. Phong, “Lectures on Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory and Integrable Systems”, hep-th/9912271

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Monopole Condensation, And Confinement In N=2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Electro-magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confine- ment in N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory”, hep-th/9407087; “Monopoles, duality, and chiral symmetry breaking in N = 2 supersymmetric QCD”, hep-th/9410167

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.