Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 97 references

Gauge dependence in proper-time quantum gravity flows is an off-shell artifact that field redefinitions can remove from Newton's constant.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 23:52 UTC pith:NHS3RCAT

load-bearing objection Clean technical extension of the essential scheme that makes gauge dependence of proper-time gravity flows drop out of the on-shell beta for G, but only after a deliberate ghost-regulator split. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06657 v1 pith:NHS3RCAT submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th gr-qc

Towards gauge independence in asymptotically safe quantum gravity

Kevin Falls , Renata Ferrero , Giovanni Oglialoro This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords asymptotic safetyquantum gravityproper-time flowessential schemegauge independencefield redefinitionsNewton's constantnon-Gaussian fixed point
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the gauge dependence seen in renormalisation-group flows for quantum gravity is not a problem for the physical content of the theory. When the flow is organised in an essential scheme, field redefinitions absorb the redundant off-shell pieces, leaving only the on-shell running of the physical couplings. In a four-derivative truncation the beta function for Newton's constant becomes independent of the remaining gauge parameter through cubic order; on a sphere the same cancellation holds for both gauge parameters to all orders in curvature and in the coupling. The mechanism is verified at one loop, where ghost contributions cancel the gauge-dependent fluctuation terms once the background is on shell. The resulting essential flow still possesses a non-Gaussian fixed point that does not depend on the gauge. A sympathetic reader cares because this supports the claim that the universal, asymptotic-safety data of quantum gravity live in the on-shell essential sector rather than in the auxiliary off-shell representation.

Core claim

Once redundant off-shell contributions are absorbed by field redefinitions in an essential scheme, the proper-time beta function for Newton's constant becomes independent of both gauge parameters of the general linear gauge (to third order in the coupling in the four-derivative truncation, and to all orders in the coupling and the Ricci scalar on a sphere), and the resulting essential flow still exhibits a gauge-independent non-Gaussian fixed point.

What carries the argument

The essential proper-time flow equation supplemented by a scale-dependent field-redefinition kernel Psi_mu nu proportional to the equations of motion, together with a regulator-specific split of the Faddeev-Popov determinant into two separately regularised factors. This combination projects the flow onto the on-shell essential sector and cancels residual gauge dependence.

Load-bearing premise

The cancellation of gauge dependence works only for a particular choice of how the proper-time regulator acts on the two factors of the ghost determinant; a different regularisation would leave residual gauge dependence.

What would settle it

Recompute the same essential flow with a different proper-time profile or with an unsplit ghost determinant and check whether the beta function for Newton's constant regains explicit dependence on the gauge parameters alpha and beta already at low orders in G or R.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The non-Gaussian fixed point and its critical exponents extracted from the essential Newton coupling can be treated as gauge-independent within the truncations studied.
  • Apparent gauge, parametrisation and scheme dependence in functional gravity flows can be reclassified as redundant off-shell structure rather than physical ambiguity.
  • Extending the curvature-dependent field-redefinition kernel to all orders systematically isolates universal on-shell data from any remaining gauge-dependent completion.
  • One-loop determinant-level calculations on shells supply an explicit check that the same cancellation mechanism operates in ordinary perturbation theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same projection continues to work for higher-derivative operators and non-maximally-symmetric backgrounds, lattice formulations of quantum gravity should be able to test the essential fixed-point values without gauge-matching ambiguities.
  • The necessity of a carefully chosen ghost regularisation suggests that regulator design itself is part of the definition of an essential scheme, not an afterthought.
  • Combining the essential projection with the flow of relational observables would give a direct route to gauge-invariant critical exponents that can be compared across continuum and discrete approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies gauge dependence of proper-time renormalisation-group flows for asymptotically safe gravity within an essential scheme. Field redefinitions are used to absorb redundant off-shell contributions, isolating the on-shell running of essential couplings. In a four-derivative truncation on general backgrounds the beta function for Newton’s constant becomes independent of the retained gauge parameter to O(G̃^{3}); on a maximally symmetric background the essential flow is independent of both parameters of the general linear gauge to all orders in curvature and in the coupling. The cancellation is shown to require a specific split of the Faddeev–Popov determinant and a matching choice of proper-time regulator. An explicit one-loop mode-by-mode calculation on the sphere confirms that gauge-dependent fluctuation contributions cancel against the ghost sector on shell. The resulting essential flow exhibits a gauge-independent non-Gaussian fixed point.

Significance. If the result holds within its stated truncations, it supplies a concrete, calculable realisation of the idea that gauge dependence in functional gravity flows is largely an off-shell artifact that can be confined to inessential directions. The explicit one-loop determinant-level cancellation (Section 4), the spectral-sum evaluation of the all-orders essential flow on the sphere (Section 5), and the tabulated critical exponents across curvature orders are genuine technical contributions. The work also clarifies that the cancellation is regulator-dependent, which is a useful caution for the broader asymptotic-safety literature. The paper does not claim full non-perturbative gauge independence; its value lies in isolating a clean essential sector inside a controlled one-loop-improved proper-time framework.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, Eqs. (1)–(7)] The central cancellation rests on the algebraic split of the Faddeev–Popov determinant into two separately regularised factors (Eq. (5) and the accompanying choice that W acts mode-by-mode on each factor). The manuscript states that “this cancellation depends on the choice of regulator” and that the split is chosen to reproduce the known on-shell cancellation of dimensional regularisation. This is load-bearing for the claim of gauge independence of the essential beta function. The paper should state more sharply whether the result is “there exists a regulator class for which the essential scheme yields gauge independence” or “the essential scheme generically yields gauge independence for proper-time regulators.” A short robustness check (or an explicit counter-example) with a different profile W, or with the unsplit ghost determinant, would substantially strengthen the interpretation.
  2. [§3.1–3.2, Eqs. (23)–(24), Fig. 2] In the four-derivative approximation the gauge-independent essential beta function is truncated at O(G̃^{3}); the full off-shell and essential beta functions retain gauge dependence at higher orders. Figure 2 shows that for m=3 the non-Gaussian fixed point disappears once O(G̃^{4}) terms are restored, while for larger m the higher-order contamination weakens. The fixed-point and critical-exponent claims in §3.2 should be qualified more carefully by this order-by-order limitation, and the relation between the O(G̃^{3}) truncation and the all-orders sphere result should be stated explicitly so that readers do not over-read the four-derivative fixed-point plots.
  3. [§5, Eq. (78) and surrounding text] The all-orders essential scheme on the sphere (Section 5) evaluates spectral sums up to a “sufficiently large n” and incorporates the topological beta function from the general-background Gaussian fixed point. The manuscript should quantify the truncation error of the spectral sum (e.g., residual contribution of omitted modes) and confirm that the reported gauge independence of ∂tG̃ is stable under that cutoff. Without such a check, the claim of independence “to all curvature orders, and all orders in the coupling” rests on an uncontrolled numerical approximation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction / §3] Typographical slips: “generak backgrounds” (Introduction), “exluding boundary terms”, and occasional missing spaces around equations. A careful proof-read is needed.
  2. [Fig. 1] Figure 1 caption and axis label use ρ˜* inconsistently with the text’s ˜ρ∗; unify notation for the fixed inessential coupling.
  3. [§3, after Eq. (20)] The ancillary .nb file is mentioned for G0(c), M(c) and T(c) but is not described in the text. A short appendix listing the leading heat-kernel or resolvent coefficients used in §3 would improve reproducibility for readers without Mathematica.
  4. [§4.1] The discussion of the Gibbons–Hawking–Perry conformal rotation (footnote in §4.1) is useful but could briefly note whether the on-shell cancellation is sensitive to that prescription.
  5. [Table 1] Table 1 would be clearer if the R∞ row were visually separated and if the mild m-dependence of θ were summarised in one sentence in the caption.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Mild self-citation of the authors' essential/on-shell framework; the gauge-cancellation and fixed-point computations are independent and not forced by definition or fit.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction; also §2.1 (MES) and §5 (comparison to [32])]
    "As a continuation of [32], we aim to clarify how gauge independence emerges once the flow is organised around its on-shell content... One realisation of an essential scheme, within the on-shell perturbative formulation of gravity, is the minimal essential scheme (MES)... After the shift 2G̃→mG̃, in the limit m→∞, the beta function ... consistently reproduces the same result as [32]."

    The interpretive claim that physical content is the on-shell essential sector, and the MES procedure used to fix inessential couplings, are taken from prior papers with overlapping authorship ([32], [36–37]). The present work does not re-derive the general essential-scheme logic from external axioms; it applies it. This is mild: the gauge-cancellation algebra and fixed-point numbers are newly computed here, so the self-citation is framework-level rather than forcing the central numerical claims by identity.

full rationale

The paper is a continuation of the authors' essential-scheme and on-shell programme ([32], [36–39]) and imports that conceptual framing, including the MES renormalisation condition and the interpretation that universal content lives in the on-shell essential sector. That is ordinary sequential self-citation, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or a fitted parameter re-labelled as a prediction. The concrete results—Hessian eigenvalues on the sphere, ghost factorisation, spectral sums, beta-function coefficients through O(G̃⁶), and the non-Gaussian fixed point/critical exponents—are computed in this work and are not algebraically identical to the inputs. The regulator split (Eq. 5) is an explicit methodological choice the paper flags as necessary for cancellation; that is a robustness caveat, not circularity of the enumerated kinds (no self-definitional identity, no fit-then-predict, no smuggled uniqueness). Score 2 reflects one non-load-bearing self-citation chain for the framework; the derivation of gauge-independent essential beta functions is self-contained computational content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the proper-time flow equation as a one-loop-improved RG, on the existence of an essential scheme realized by field redefinitions proportional to the equations of motion, and on a regulator split that is chosen so that gauge-dependent determinants cancel on shell. No new particles or forces are postulated; free parameters are the usual truncation and regulator choices of the asymptotic-safety literature.

free parameters (2)
  • proper-time regulator parameter m
    Controls the shape of the profile function W(z)=(k^{2}/(z+k^{2}))^m; results for fixed points and critical exponents retain a mild residual m-dependence that is scanned but not fixed by first principles.
  • curvature-truncation order N (or four-derivative cutoff)
    The space of operators retained in the effective action is truncated by hand; gauge independence is proven only inside each finite truncation.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The proper-time flow equation with one-loop trace structure, improved by a scale-dependent field redefinition, correctly captures the essential RG of quantum gravity.
    Stated in Sec. 2; known to miss genuine two-loop contributions.
  • domain assumption Field redefinitions of the form Ψ_μν = γ(R) g_μν (or its curvature-squared extension) exhaust the redundant directions that must be removed to reach the essential scheme.
    Imported from the essential-scheme literature and used throughout Secs. 2–5.
  • ad hoc to paper The Faddeev–Popov determinant may be split into two factors that are regularized separately so that the proper-time profile W acts mode-by-mode; this split is required for on-shell cancellation.
    Explicitly introduced in Eqs. (5)–(8) and justified by matching the transverse/longitudinal ghost operators; the paper notes that the cancellation depends on this choice.
  • standard math Standard heat-kernel / spectral-sum technology on maximally symmetric backgrounds correctly evaluates the proper-time traces.
    Used in Secs. 3–5; standard in the literature.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 28702 in / 2868 out tokens · 33587 ms · 2026-07-10T23:52:27.383534+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study gauge dependence in proper-time renormalisation group flows for asymptotically safe quantum gravity. Working in an essential scheme, we use field redefinitions to separate redundant off-shell contributions from the on-shell running of physical couplings. We consider two approximations: in the first, we work on general backgrounds and project onto all terms with up to four derivatives, neglecting boundary terms; in the second, we work on a maximally symmetric background and retain all orders in the Ricci scalar. Although the flow equation depends on the gauge parameters, this dependence can be cancelled order by order once the redundant terms are absorbed by field redefinitions. In the four-derivative approximation, the dependence on the retained gauge parameter drops out of the beta function for Newton's constant to third order in the coupling. On the sphere, the flow becomes independent of both parameters of the general gauge to all curvature orders, and all orders in the coupling. Crucially, this cancellation depends on the choice of regulator. We verify the mechanism explicitly at one loop, where the gauge-dependent fluctuation contributions are cancelled by the ghost sector on shell. The resulting essential flow displays a gauge-independent non-Gaussian fixed point, supporting the interpretation that universal information in quantum gravity is encoded in the on-shell essential sector.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06657 by Giovanni Oglialoro, Kevin Falls, Renata Ferrero.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The inessential coupling ˜ρ∗ in d = 4 dimensions at the non-Gaussian fixed point for different values of m. This feature reflects the fact that the coefficient of R extracted from the off-shell flow still contains contributions from redundant directions. In the present scheme these are precisely the contributions that are tied to the field redefinition kernel and to the off-shell continuation of the action… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Beta function of the dimensionless Newton constant in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The critical exponent θ in d = 4 dimensions at the non-Gaussian fixed point for different values of m. The solid line shows the result for the gauge independent truncation up to O(G˜3 ), the dotted line for the full beta function in the Feynman gauge α = 1 and the dashed line the one in the Landau gauge α = 0. From the truncated proper-time flow, we observe the following. The off-shell beta function of New… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The critical exponent θ for the spherical background in d = 4 dimensions at the non-Gaussian fixed point for different values of m. 0 2 4 6 8 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 R ˜ γ* ˜ (R) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: γ∗(R˜) in d = 4 dimensions for α = 0, β = 1, and m = 8. 6 Conclusions In this work, we have analysed gauge dependence in proper-time renormalisation group flows for asymptotically safe quantum gravity from the viewpoint of essential couplings. The central result is that the gauge dependence of the proper-time flow is an off-shell effect: it is tied to redundant directions in theory space and can be removed… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ˜ωk (solid line) and ∂tω˜k (dashed line) in d = 4 dimensions for α = 0, β = 1, and m = 8, with the boundary ˜ω1 = 1.4 × 104 , where we take units such that some reference scale k0 = 1. survives in the sector expected to carry the physical information. We also checked the determinant-level origin of this mechanism in a fixed one-loop calculation. On maximally symmetric backgrounds, the gauge-fixed fluctuati… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 75 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Weinberg, Critical Phenomena for Field Theorists, in14th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Understanding the Fundamental Constitutents of Matter(1976)

    S. Weinberg, Critical Phenomena for Field Theorists, in14th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Understanding the Fundamental Constitutents of Matter(1976)

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    Nonperturbative Evolution Equation for Quantum Gravity

    M. Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D57, 971 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9605030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, 100 Years of General Relativity, Vol

    R. Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, 100 Years of General Relativity, Vol. 3 (World Scientific, 2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Critical reflections on asymptotically safe gravity

    A. Bonanno, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, R. Percacci, M. Reuter, F. Saueressig, and G. P. Vacca, Critical reflections on asymptotically safe gravity, Front. in Phys.8, 269 (2020), arXiv:2004.06810 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Exact evolution equation for the effective potential

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    T. R. Morris, The Exact renormalization group and approximate solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 2411 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9308265

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Flow Equations for N Point Functions and Bound States

    U. Ellwanger, FLow equations for N point functions and bound states, Z. Phys. C62, 503 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9308260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  8. [8]

    J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisation group, Annals Phys.322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0512261

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, On gauge invariant Wilsonian flows, inWorkshop on the Exact Renormalization Group(1998) pp. 168–185, arXiv:hep-th/9901063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    T. R. Morris, A Manifestly gauge invariant exact renormalization group, inWorkshop on the Exact Renormalization Group(1998) pp. 1–40, arXiv:hep-th/9810104

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    T. R. Morris, A Gauge invariant exact renormalization group. 1., Nucl. Phys. B573, 97 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9910058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  12. [12]

    T. R. Morris, A Gauge invariant exact renormalization group. 2., JHEP12, 012, arXiv:hep- th/0006064

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    A proposal for a manifestly gauge invariant and universal calculus in Yang-Mills theory

    S. Arnone, A. Gatti, and T. R. Morris, A Proposal for a manifestly gauge invariant and universal calculus in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D67, 085003 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0209162

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    T. R. Morris and A. W. H. Preston, Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renor- malization Group, JHEP06, 012, arXiv:1602.08993 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Gauge invariant flow equation

    C. Wetterich, Gauge invariant flow equation, Nucl. Phys. B931, 262 (2018), arXiv:1607.02989 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Background independent exact renormalisation

    K. Falls, Background independent exact renormalisation, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 121 (2021), arXiv:2004.11409 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Gradient flow exact renormalization group

    H. Sonoda and H. Suzuki, Gradient flow exact renormalization group, PTEP2021, 023B05 (2021), arXiv:2012.03568 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Physics-informed gauge theories

    F. Ihssen and J. M. Pawlowski, Physics-informed gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D112, 105005 (2025), arXiv:2503.22638 [hep-th]. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter, Proper time flow equation for gravity, JHEP02, 035, arXiv:hep- th/0410191

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Towards an accurate determination of the critical exponents with the Renormalization Group flow equations

    A. Bonanno and D. Zappala, Towards an accurate determination of the critical exponents with the renormalization group flow equations, Phys. Lett. B504, 181 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0010095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    Proper time regulator and Renormalization Group flow

    M. Mazza and D. Zappala, Proper time regulator and renormalization group flow, Phys. Rev. D 64, 105013 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0106230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    On Exact Proper Time Wilsonian RG Flows

    A. Bonanno, S. Lippoldt, R. Percacci, and G. P. Vacca, On Exact Proper Time Wilsonian RG Flows, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 249 (2020), arXiv:1912.08135 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Gauge Dependence of the Effective Average Action in Einstein Gravity

    S. Falkenberg and S. D. Odintsov, Gauge dependence of the effective average action in Einstein gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13, 607 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9612019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    N. Ohta, R. Percacci, and A. D. Pereira, Gauges and functional measures in quantum gravity I: Einstein theory, JHEP06, 115, arXiv:1605.00454 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    N. Ohta, R. Percacci, and A. D. Pereira, Gauges and functional measures in quantum gravity II: Higher derivative gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 611 (2017), arXiv:1610.07991 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    H. Gies, B. Knorr, and S. Lippoldt, Generalized Parametrization Dependence in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D92, 084020 (2015), arXiv:1507.08859 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Field Parametrization Dependence in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity

    A. Nink, Field Parametrization Dependence in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D91, 044030 (2015), arXiv:1410.7816 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    The Running Gravitational Couplings

    D. Dou and R. Percacci, The running gravitational couplings, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 3449 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9707239

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  29. [29]

    Gauge and parametrization dependence of Quantum Einstein Gravity within the Proper Time flow

    A. Bonanno, G. Oglialoro, and D. Zappal` a, Gauge and parametrization dependence of quantum Einstein gravity within the proper time flow, Phys. Rev. D112, 026002 (2025), arXiv:2504.07877 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    De Sitter quantum gravity within the covariant Lorentzian approach to asymptotic safety

    E. D’Angelo, R. Ferrero, and M. B. Fr¨ ob, De Sitter quantum gravity within the co- variant Lorentzian approach to asymptotic safety, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 125008 (2025), arXiv:2502.05135 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    L. E. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    Asymptotic Safety within on-shell perturbation theory

    K. Falls and R. Ferrero, Asymptotic safety within on-shell perturbation theory, JHEP08, 173, arXiv:2411.00938 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Fixed Points of Quantum Gravity from Dimensional Regularisation

    Y. Kluth, Fixed points of quantum gravity from dimensional regularization, Phys. Rev. D111, 106010 (2025), arXiv:2409.09252 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Rethinking Dimensional Regularization in Critical Phenomena

    P. Beretta and A. Codello, Rethinking Dimensional Regularization in Critical Phenomena (2026), arXiv:2604.25103 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Functional Dimensional Regularization for O(N) Models

    P. Beretta and A. Codello, Functional Dimensional Regularization for O(N) Models (2026), arXiv:2604.26207 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Essential renormalisation group

    A. Baldazzi, R. B. A. Zinati, and K. Falls, Essential renormalisation group, SciPost Phys.13, 085 (2022), arXiv:2105.11482 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Essential Quantum Einstein Gravity

    A. Baldazzi and K. Falls, Essential Quantum Einstein Gravity, Universe7, 294 (2021), arXiv:2107.00671 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Momentum-dependent field redefinitions in Asymptotic Safety

    B. Knorr, Momentum-dependent field redefinitions in asymptotic safety, Phys. Rev. D110, 026001 (2024), arXiv:2311.12097 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Safe essential scalar-tensor theories

    B. Knorr, Safe essential scalar-tensor theories (2022), arXiv:2204.08564 [hep-th]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Kamefuchi, L

    S. Kamefuchi, L. O’Raifeartaigh, and A. Salam, Change of variables and equivalence theorems in quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys.28, 529 (1961)

    work page 1961

  41. [41]

    J. S. R. Chisholm, Change of variables in quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys.26, 469 (1961)

    work page 1961

  42. [42]

    R. E. Kallosh and I. V. Tyutin, The Equivalence theorem and gauge invariance in renormalizable theories, Yad. Fiz.17, 190 (1973)

    work page 1973

  43. [43]

    G. V. Efimov and M. L. Rutenberg, On the equivalence theorem in quantum field theory, Theor. Math. Phys.16, 763 (1973)

    work page 1973

  44. [44]

    I. V. Tyutin, Once again on the equivalence theorem, Phys. Atom. Nucl.65, 194 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0001050

    work page arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Reduced Effective Lagrangians

    C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B342, 189 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9304230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  46. [46]

    Renormalization Group Flow of Quantum Gravity in the Einstein-Hilbert Truncation

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Renormalization group flow of quantum gravity in the Einstein- Hilbert truncation, Phys. Rev. D65, 065016 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0110054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    S. M. Christensen and M. J. Duff, Quantizing Gravity with a Cosmological Constant, Nucl. Phys. B170, 480 (1980)

    work page 1980

  48. [48]

    Asymptotic safety goes on shell

    D. Benedetti, Asymptotic safety goes on shell, New J. Phys.14, 015005 (2012), arXiv:1107.3110 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Physical renormalization schemes and asymptotic safety in quantum gravity

    K. Falls, Physical renormalization schemes and asymptotic safety in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D96, 126016 (2017), arXiv:1702.03577 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    F. J. Wegner, Some invariance properties of the renormalization group, J. Phys. C7, 2098 (1974)

    work page 2098

  51. [51]

    J. I. Latorre and T. R. Morris, Exact scheme independence, JHEP11, 004, arXiv:hep-th/0008123

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Exact Schwinger Proper Time Renormalisation

    S. Abel and L. Heurtier, Exact Schwinger Proper Time Renormalisation, JHEP08, 198, arXiv:2311.12102 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    E. M. Glaviano and A. Bonanno, Proper-time flow equation and non-local truncations in quantum gravity, in17th Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Exper- imental General Relativity, Gravitation, and Relativistic Field Theories(2024) arXiv:2410.23696 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    D. F. Litim and J. M. Pawlowski, Perturbation theory and renormalization group equations, Phys. Rev. D65, 081701 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0111191

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  55. [55]

    Simplified functional flow equation

    C. Wetterich, Simplified functional flow equation, Phys. Lett. B864, 139435 (2025), arXiv:2403.17523 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    A. M. Bonanno, R. A. Konoplya, G. Oglialoro, and A. Spina, Regular black holes from proper-time flow in quantum gravity and their quasinormal modes, shadow and Hawking radiation, JCAP12, 042, arXiv:2509.12469 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Giacometti, D

    G. Giacometti, D. Rizzo, and D. Zappala, Universal content of the proper time flow in scalar and Yang-Mills theories, Phys. Rev. D113, 045020 (2026), arXiv:2510.04896 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Quantum gravity contributions to the gauge and Yukawa couplings in proper time flow

    G. Giacometti, K. Kowalska, D. Rizzo, E. M. Sessolo, and D. Zappala, Quantum gravity contribu- tions to the gauge and Yukawa couplings in proper time flow (2026), arXiv:2604.03033 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    A. M. Bonanno, E. M. Glaviano, and G. P. Vacca, Proper-time functional renormalization in O(N) scalar models coupled to gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 450 (2026), arXiv:2508.00807 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    A. M. Bonanno and E. M. Glaviano, Gravitationally Induced UV Completion of anO(N) Scalar Theory (2026), arXiv:2601.20820 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    A. M. Bonanno and E. M. Glaviano, Fifth-Force Constraints from UV-Complete Scalar-Tensor Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 201501 (2026), arXiv:2605.10338 [gr-qc]. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    A. M. Bonanno, D. Buccio, E. M. Glaviano, and F. Saueressig, Scaling Solutions of Matter Form Factors in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity (2026), arXiv:2605.11805 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    E. M. Glaviano, Asymptotically Safe Gravitational Form Factors from the Proper-Time Flow Equation (2026), arXiv:2605.29159 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    A. M. Bonanno, R. Ferrero, and G. Oglialoro, Coarse graining from within: Wilson-Fisher uni- versality onS 3 (2026), arXiv:2606.04085 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky, The Generalized Schwinger-Dewitt Technique in Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rept.119, 1 (1985)

    work page 1985

  66. [66]

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky, Covariant perturbation theory. 2: Second order in the curvature. General algorithms, Nucl. Phys. B333, 471 (1990)

    work page 1990

  67. [67]

    A. O. Barvinsky and W. Wachowski, Heat kernel expansion for higher order minimal and non- minimal operators, Phys. Rev. D105, 065013 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 089901 (2024)], arXiv:2112.03062 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    A. O. Barvinsky, A. V. Kurov, and W. Wachowski, Commutator technique for the heat kernel of minimal higher derivative operators, Phys. Rev. D110, 085023 (2024), arXiv:2408.10990 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    K. Groh, F. Saueressig, and O. Zanusso, Off-diagonal heat-kernel expansion and its application to fields with differential constraints (2011), arXiv:1112.4856 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  70. [70]

    Heat kernel coefficients for massive gravity

    R. Ferrero, M. B. Fr¨ ob, and W. C. C. Lima, Heat kernel coefficients for massive gravity, J. Math. Phys.65, 082301 (2024), arXiv:2312.10816 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    One-loop quantum gravity from a worldline viewpoint

    F. Bastianelli and R. Bonezzi, One-loop quantum gravity from a worldline viewpoint, JHEP07, 016, arXiv:1304.7135 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Gauge-invariant coefficients in perturbative quantum gravity

    F. Bastianelli, R. Bonezzi, and M. Melis, Gauge-invariant coefficients in perturbative quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 1139 (2022), arXiv:2206.13287 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Ultraviolet properties of f(R)-Gravity

    A. Codello, R. Percacci, and C. Rahmede, Ultraviolet properties of f(R)-gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A23, 143 (2008), arXiv:0705.1769 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  74. [74]

    P. F. Machado and F. Saueressig, On the renormalization group flow of f(R)-gravity, Phys. Rev. D77, 124045 (2008), arXiv:0712.0445 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Asymptotic safety and the cosmological constant

    K. Falls, Asymptotic safety and the cosmological constant, JHEP01, 069, arXiv:1408.0276 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    Renormalisation of Newton's constant

    K. Falls, Renormalization of Newton’s constant, Phys. Rev. D92, 124057 (2015), arXiv:1501.05331 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    Renormalization Group Equation for $f(R)$ gravity on hyperbolic spaces

    K. Falls and N. Ohta, Renormalization Group Equation forf(R) gravity on hyperbolic spaces, Phys. Rev. D94, 084005 (2016), arXiv:1607.08460 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Heat kernel coefficients on the sphere in any dimension

    Y. Kluth and D. F. Litim, Heat kernel coefficients on the sphere in any dimension, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 269 (2020), arXiv:1910.00543 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    The Universal RG Machine

    D. Benedetti, K. Groh, P. F. Machado, and F. Saueressig, The Universal RG Machine, JHEP06, 079, arXiv:1012.3081 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and M. J. Perry, Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action, Nucl. Phys. B138, 141 (1978)

    work page 1978

Showing first 80 references.