Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 59 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

String breaking spotted in QCD flux tubes at ~1 fm

2026-07-09 18:59 UTC pith:GOGWBV5C

load-bearing objection New flux-tube imaging method gives genuine hints of string breaking, but the key renormalization check is missing at the distance where the signal appears. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07143 v1 pith:GOGWBV5C submitted 2026-07-08 hep-lat

Hints for string breaking in QCD

P. Cea , V. Chelnokov , L. Cosmai , A. Papa This is my paper
classification hep-lat PACS 12.38.Gc12.38.Aw11.15.Ha
keywords string breakinglattice QCDflux tubechromo-electric fieldconfinementSchwinger mechanismstatic quark-antiquark potential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates whether the confining flux tube between a static quark and antiquark in full QCD (with physical quark masses) breaks apart when the separation becomes large enough. The authors measure the chromo-electric field between the sources using two lattice operators (Schwinger line attached to the quark or to the antiquark). At a separation of 0.963 fm, the nonperturbative longitudinal electric field is uniform along the interquak axis and respects quark-antiquark symmetry, indicating an intact flux tube. At 1.156 fm, the field is suppressed near the midpoint and the symmetry is lost, signaling that a dynamical quark-antiquark pair has been created from the vacuum, splitting the original string into two shorter segments. The authors constrain the breaking distance to the range 0.963–1.156 fm, consistent with the Schwinger mechanism, and confirm that no breaking occurs in pure-gauge SU(3) (infinite quark mass) or in QCD with heavier symmetric quark masses at the same separation.

Core claim

By directly imaging the gauge-invariant chromo-electric field profile between static color sources, the authors observe a qualitative transition between d=0.963 fm (intact, symmetric flux tube) and d=1.156 fm (suppressed field at midpoint, broken symmetry), constraining the QCD string-breaking distance to roughly 1 fm at physical quark masses.

What carries the argument

Connected correlation function of a Wilson loop and a plaquette linked by a Schwinger line, yielding the nonperturbative longitudinal chromo-electric field E_NP and the perturbative Coulomb-like field E_C; quark-antiquark symmetry/antisymmetry of these fields as a diagnostic for flux-tube integrity.

Load-bearing premise

The loss of quark-antiquark symmetry and suppression of the nonperturbative field near the flux-tube midpoint at d=1.156 fm is interpreted as a physical signature of dynamical pair creation, rather than a systematic artifact of the Schwinger-line renormalization or smearing procedure, which the authors note can introduce distance-dependent effects.

What would settle it

If the observed suppression and symmetry loss at d=1.156 fm were shown to vanish under improved renormalization or alternative smearing protocols, the string-breaking claim would lose its direct observational basis.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies the chromo-electric field between a static quark-antiquark pair in lattice QCD with 2+1 HISQ flavors at physical quark masses, using connected correlators with Schwinger lines attached to either the quark or antiquark time line. By examining both the nonperturbative longitudinal field $E_x^{NP}$ and the perturbative Coulomb-like fields ($E_y$, $E_z$, $E_x^P$) across the full interquark region, the authors identify qualitative signatures of string breaking at $d = 1.156$ fm that are absent at $d = 0.963$ fm. Consistency checks in SU(3) pure-gauge theory (no breaking up to 1.330 fm) and in QCD with symmetric heavy quark masses (no breaking at 1.156 fm) support the interpretation that the signal is tied to light dynamical quarks. The authors constrain the string-breaking distance to $0.963~{rm fm} lesssim d^* lesssim 1.156~{rm fm}$.

Significance. The approach is complementary to the standard Wilson-loop potential method, which suffers from poor overlap with the broken-string ground state. By directly imaging the gauge-invariant field profile and its quark-antiquark symmetry properties, the authors provide a model-independent diagnostic for string breaking. The inclusion of pure-gauge and heavy-quark controls is a genuine strength, as is the use of two independent correlators (quark-side and antiquark-side Schwinger lines) to scan the full interquark region. The estimated range for $d^*$ is broadly consistent with existing lattice determinations ($d^* simeq 1.21$ fm from Ref. [42]).

major comments (3)
  1. Sect. 3, discussion of Fig. 5: The authors verify that the geometric mean $sqrt{E_{x,q}^{NP} cdot E_{x,bar{q}}^{NP}}$ is approximately independent of $x_l$ at $d = 0.963$ fm, confirming that the Schwinger-line renormalization cancels and the underlying field is uniform. This check is not repeated at $d = 1.156$ fm, where the central string-breaking signal resides. Since the signal at $d = 1.156$ fm relies on the observed asymmetry between the quark and antiquark correlators (Fig. 11), and since the Schwinger lines are longer at this distance, producing the analogous geometric-mean plot at $d = 1.156$ fm would directly test whether the asymmetry is physical rather than a renormalization artifact. The authors' own argument implies the geometric mean carries a renormalization factor $A^{d/2+x_t}$ independent of $x_l$, so this plot should be straightforward to produce and would substantially
  2. Sect. 3.2, Figs. 11-14: The evidence for string breaking at $d = 1.156$ fm is presented qualitatively (e.g., 'it seems,' 'there is an indication,' 'strongly suppressed'). No quantitative measure of the symmetry violation or field suppression is provided. For instance, how many standard deviations is the antiquark-side $E_x^{NP}(x_t=0)$ below the quark-side value near the midpoint? A simple quantitative comparison (e.g., a ratio or difference with error bars) would strengthen the claim and allow the reader to judge whether the effect is statistically significant.
  3. Abstract vs. Sect. 4: The abstract states the range as $0.963~{rm fm} lesssim d^* lesssim 1.156~{rm fm}$, while the conclusion in Sect. 4 states '(0.963 fm to 1.116 fm).' This discrepancy (1.156 vs. 1.116) should be corrected. If 1.156 fm is the intended upper bound, the conclusion should be fixed; if 1.116 fm is intended, the abstract needs revision.
minor comments (6)
  1. Sect. 2, Fig. 2: The caption refers to $E_x(x_l = 3a, x_t)$ but the y-axis label and the smearing discussion could benefit from explicitly stating the units and the physical value of $x_l$.
  2. Sect. 3.2, Fig. 11: The text states the flux tube 'seems to break at around the middle point leading to two strings with $d_1 approx 0.7$ fm and $d_2 approx 0.3$ fm.' It would help to clarify how these sub-distances are estimated from the data.
  3. Sect. 3.3, Fig. 15 (upper panel): The text mentions that conclusions hold also for $d = 14a simeq 1.348$ fm 'albeit with rather larger statistical uncertainties,' but no figure is shown for this case. Including at least the $E_x^{NP}(x_t=0)$ profile for $d = 1.348$ fm would strengthen the consistency argument.
  4. Sect. 3.1: The authors mention that the transverse fields $E_y$ and $E_z$ 'can be well fitted by a screened Coulomb field' with parameters $Q$ and $mu$, and that $E_x^P$ can be similarly fitted, but defer details to a forthcoming paper. Providing at least the fitted parameter values in a table or footnote would allow the reader to assess the quality of the Coulomb interpretation.
  5. Table 1: The lattice size is listed as '484' and '244' in various places; standard notation would be $48^4$ and $24^4$ for clarity.
  6. Sect. 2: The temperature $T$ is listed in Table 1 but its values are not discussed in the text. A brief statement that all simulations are at $T < 70$ MeV (well below $T_c$) would reassure the reader that finite-temperature effects are negligible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found: the string-breaking signal is a direct lattice observation, not a fitted prediction or self-referential construction

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The connected correlator (Eq. 1) is a direct lattice measurement of Wilson loops, plaquettes, and Schwinger lines — no fitted parameters are introduced and then re-predicted. The decomposition E = E^NP + E^C (Eqs. 3–4) is a standard field-theoretic identity (irrotational vs. curl-free decomposition), not a definition that smuggles the conclusion into the premise. The magnetic current J_M = ∇ × E^NP (Eq. 5) follows mathematically from the measured fields. The central claim — that string breaking occurs in the range [0.963, 1.156] fm — is inferred from qualitative changes in directly measured field profiles (suppression of E^NP near the midpoint, loss of quark-antiquark symmetry, sign reversal of transverse fields at d=1.156 fm vs. well-defined flux tube at d=0.963 fm). No parameter is fitted to the string-breaking data and then presented as a prediction of those same data. The self-citations to prior works [27–34] provide methodological context and prior observations, but the load-bearing argument rests on new measurements at new distances, not on conclusions imported from those citations. The consistency checks (pure-gauge SU(3) showing no breaking at d≈1.33 fm; heavy symmetric quark masses showing no breaking at d≈1.156 fm) are independent corroborations, not circular restatements. The skeptic's concern about the Schwinger-line renormalization check not being repeated at d=1.156 fm is a legitimate systematics/correctness issue, but it does not constitute circularity — the observed asymmetry is a measurement, not a quantity defined in terms of the result it claims to derive.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or entities are postulated. The free parameters are smearing choices, not physical fits. The axioms are standard lattice QCD constructions from the authors' established program and the broader literature.

free parameters (3)
  • HYPt smearing parameters (α1, α2, α3) = (1.0, 1.0, 0.5)
    Chosen by hand for temporal-link smearing; standard values from Ref. 56.
  • HYP3d smearing parameters (α1, α3) = (0.75, 0.3)
    Chosen by hand for spatial-link smearing.
  • Number of HYP3d smearing steps = 50
    Chosen as sufficient for stabilization based on Fig. 2; not a fitted physical parameter but a methodological choice.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The connected correlator ρ^conn_{W,μν} (Eq. 1) provides a gauge-invariant lattice definition of the field-strength tensor F_{μν} induced by static sources (Eq. 2).
    This is the foundational methodological axiom, established in prior work (Refs. 10-14, 27-34). It is a standard lattice QCD construction.
  • domain assumption The chromo-electric field decomposes into a nonperturbative longitudinal part and a perturbative irrotational part (Eq. 3-4).
    Invoked in Sect. 1 and used throughout Sect. 3 to separate confinement-related and Coulomb-like contributions.
  • domain assumption A well-defined flux tube manifests as a nonperturbative longitudinal field that is uniform along the interquark axis and satisfies quark-antiquark symmetry (Eq. 12-13).
    Used as the diagnostic criterion: if symmetry holds, the string is unbroken; if it breaks, string breaking has occurred.
  • domain assumption String breaking in QCD proceeds via the Schwinger mechanism (pair tunneling from the vacuum), implying the breaking distance increases with quark mass.
    Invoked in Sect. 3.3 to interpret the absence of breaking in pure-gauge and heavy-mass QCD as confirmation.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 22289 in / 2929 out tokens · 329644 ms · 2026-07-09T18:59:07.122738+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present results for the chromo-electric field generated by a static quark-antiquark pair at nearly zero temperature in lattice QCD with 2+1 dynamical staggered fermions at physical quark masses. We investigate the evolution of the flux-tube structure as the distance between the static color charges increases. We find hints that string breaking occurs at a distance in the range $0.963 \; \text{fm} \; \lesssim \; d^* \lesssim \; 1.156 \; \text{fm}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07143 by A. Papa, L. Cosmai, P. Cea, V. Chelnokov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The flux-tube operator with the Schwinger line attached to the quark time line (left) or to the antiquark time line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of smearing. We consider here the case of QCD (2+1) HISQ flavors, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A sample of the Ex, Ey, Ez fields obtained from the “quark correlator” (Schwinger line attached to the quark time line in the Wilson loop) and the “antiquark correlator” (Schwinger line attached to the antiquark time line in the Wilson loop). The data refer to the case of QCD (2+1) HISQ flavors, 484 lattice, β = 6.880, with distance d = 10a ≃ 0.963 fm between the quark and the antiquark, and 50 HYP3d smear… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The quantity q ENP x,q (xl ,xt = 0)E NP x,q¯ (xl ,xt = 0) in the case of QCD (2+1) HISQ flavors, 484 lattice, β = 6.880, d = 10a ≃ 0.963 fm. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The full 3D profile of the magnetic current and the longitudinal nonperturbative electric field for QCD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The nonperturbative electric field at xt = 0 along the flux tube for d = 10a ≃ 0.963 fm. from the quark connected correlator, while for d 2 ≤ xl ≤ d they come from the antiquark connected correlator. Note that at the middle point the two different estimates of the nonper￾turbative longitudinal electric field are in nice agreement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Transverse distribution of the magnetic current and nonperturbative electric field near the color sources and at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Transverse distribution of the electric fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The nonperturbative electric field at xt = 0 along the flux tube for d = 12a ≃ 1.156 fm. ing. Indeed, looking at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The perturbative longitudinal electric field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Transverse distribution of the magnetic current and nonperturbative electric field near the color sources and at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Transverse distribution of the electric fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (upper panel) The nonperturbative longitudinal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics

    F. Gross et al., Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1125 (2023), 2212.11107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Fukugita, T

    M. Fukugita, T. Niuya, Phys. Lett.B132, 374 (1983)

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    Kiskis, K

    J.E. Kiskis, K. Sparks, Phys. Rev.D30, 1326 (1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Flower, S.W

    J.W. Flower, S.W. Otto, Phys. Lett.B160, 128 (1985)

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Wosiek, R.W

    J. Wosiek, R.W. Haymaker, Phys. Rev.D36, 3297 (1987)

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Di Giacomo, M

    A. Di Giacomo, M. Maggiore, S. Olejnik, Phys. Lett. B236, 199 (1990)

    work page 1990

  7. [7]

    Di Giacomo, M

    A. Di Giacomo, M. Maggiore, S. Olejnik, Nucl. Phys. B347, 441 (1990)

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    Structure of Abrikosov Vortices in SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory

    V . Singh, D.A. Browne, R.W. Haymaker, Phys. Lett. B306, 115 (1993),hep-lat/9301004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  9. [9]

    The (dual) Meissner effect in SU(2) and SU(3) QCD

    Y . Matsubara, S. Ejiri, T. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 34, 176 (1994),hep-lat/9311061

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  10. [10]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, Nuovo Cim.A107, 541 (1994), hep-lat/9210030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  11. [11]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.34, 219 (1994),hep-lat/9311023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  12. [12]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, Phys. Lett.B349, 343 (1995), hep-lat/9404017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  13. [13]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.42, 225 (1995),hep-lat/9411048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  14. [14]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, Phys. Rev.D52, 5152 (1995), hep-lat/9504008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  15. [15]

    G.S. Bali, K. Schilling, C. Schlichter, Phys. Rev.D51, 5165 (1995),hep-lat/9409005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  16. [16]

    Model independent approach to studies of the confining dual Abrikosov vortex in SU(2) lattice gauge theory

    R.W. Haymaker, T. Matsuki, Phys. Rev.D75, 014501 (2007),hep-lat/0505019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Dual superconductivity and vacuum properties in Yang--Mills theories

    A. D’Alessandro, M. D’Elia, L. Tagliacozzo, Nucl.Phys. B774, 168 (2007),hep-lat/0607014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    Chromoelectric flux tubes in QCD

    M.S. Cardaci, P. Cea, L. Cosmai, R. Falcone, A. Papa, Phys. Rev.D83, 014502 (2011),1011.5803

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, A. Papa, Phys. Rev.D86, 054501 (2012),1208.1362

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, F. Cuteri, A. Papa, PoSLAT- TICE2013, 468 (2013),1310.8423

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, F. Cuteri, A. Papa, Phys. Rev.D89, 094505 (2014),1404.1172

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    P. Cea, L. Cosmai, F. Cuteri, A. Papa, PoSLAT- TICE2014, 350 (2014),1410.4394

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Inside the SU(3) quark-antiquark QCD flux tube: screening versus quantum widening

    N. Cardoso, M. Cardoso, P. Bicudo, Phys. Rev.D88, 054504 (2013),1302.3633

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    A different kind of string

    M. Caselle, M. Panero, R. Pellegrini, D. Vadacchino, JHEP01, 105 (2015),1406.5127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Pure gauge QCD flux tubes and their widths at finite temperature

    P. Bicudo, N. Cardoso, M. Cardoso (2017),1702.03454

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Colour field densities of the quark-antiquark excited flux tubes in SU(3) lattice QCD

    P. Bicudo, N. Cardoso, M. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D98, 114507 (2018),1808.08815

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Isolating the confining color field in the SU(3) flux tube

    M. Baker, P. Cea, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, F. Cuteri, A. Papa, Eur. Phys. J.C79, 478 (2019),1810.07133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    The confining color field in SU(3) gauge theory

    M. Baker, P. Cea, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, F. Cuteri, A. Papa, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 514 (2020),1912.04739 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Unveiling confinement in pure gauge SU(3): flux tubes, fields, and magnetic currents

    M. Baker, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, F. Cuteri, A. Papa, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 937 (2022),2207.08797

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Unveiling SU(3) Flux Tubes At Nonzero Temperature: Electric Fields and Magnetic Currents

    M. Baker, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, F. Cuteri, A. Papa, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 150 (2024),2310.04298

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Unveiling the flux tube structure in full QCD

    M. Baker, P. Cea, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, A. Papa, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 29 (2025),2409.20168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Investigating the flux tube structure within full QCD

    M. Baker, P. Cea, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, A. Papa, PoSLA TTICE2024, 390 (2025),2411.01886

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Baker, P

    M. Baker, P. Cea, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, A. Papa, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol.5, 100280 (2026), 2512.05804

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Baker, P

    M. Baker, P. Cea, V . Chelnokov, L. Cosmai, A. Papa, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 277 (2026),2510.02177

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    The QCD vacuum as a disordered chromomagnetic condensate

    P. Cea, Universe2024, 10, 111 (2024),2311.14791

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    String breaking in Lattice QCD

    E. Laermann, C.E. DeTar, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.73, 447 (1999), hep-lat/9809105

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  37. [37]

    Observing string breaking with Wilson loops

    S. Kratochvila, P. de Forcrand, Nucl. Phys. B671, 103 (2003),hep-lat/0306011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  38. [38]

    Strong Coupling Model for String Breaking on the Lattice

    I.T. Drummond, Phys. Lett. B434, 92 (1998), hep-lat/9805012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  39. [39]

    G.S. Bali, H. Neff, T. Duessel, T. Lippert, K. Schilling (SESAM), Phys. Rev.D71, 114513 (2005), hep-lat/0505012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [40]

    V . Koch, J. Bulava, B. Hörz, F. Knechtli, G. Moir, C. Morningstar, M. Peardon, PoSLATTICE2018, 053 (2018),1811.09289

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    String breaking by light and strange quarks in QCD

    J. Bulava, B. Hörz, F. Knechtli, V . Koch, G. Moir, C. Morningstar, M. Peardon, Phys. Lett. B793, 493 (2019),1902.04006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    The quark-mass dependence of the potential energy between static colour sources in the QCD vacuum with light and strange quarks

    J. Bulava, F. Knechtli, V . Koch, C. Morningstar, M. Pear- don, Phys. Lett. B854, 138754 (2024),2403.00754

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    M. John, K. Pareek, P. Tirler, T. Gollerthan, M. Meth, L. Gerster, P. Zoller, D. Gonzalez-Cuadra, T.V . Zache, M. Ringbauer,Non-Abelian String-Breaking Dynamics on a Qudit Quantum Computer(2026),2605.05841

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Gonzalez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T.V . Zache, B. Braver- man, M. Kornjaca, A. Lukin, S.H. Cantu, F. Liu, S.T. Wang, A. Keesling et al., Nature642, 321 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F.M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E.R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K.S. Collins, Z. Davoudi et al.,Observation of string-breaking dy- namics in a quantum simulator(2024),2410.13815

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    String Breaking in the Heavy Quark Limit with Scalable Circuits

    A.N. Ciavarella, Physical Review D111, 054501 (2025), 2411.05915

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Magnifico, M

    G. Magnifico, M. Dalmonte, P. Facchi, S. Pascazio, F.V . Pepe, E. Ercolessi, Quantum4, 281 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Digital quantum simulation of a (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory with ion qudits

    G. Calajò, G. Magnifico, C. Edmunds, M. Ringbauer, S. Montangero, P. Silvi, PRX Quantum5, 040309 (2024), 2402.07987

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Highly Improved Staggered Quarks on the Lattice, with Applications to Charm Physics

    E. Follana et al. (HPQCD Collaboration, UKQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev.D75, 054502 (2007), hep-lat/0610092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Full nonperturbative QCD simulations with 2+1 flavors of improved staggered quarks

    A. Bazavov et al. (MILC), Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1349 (2010),0903.3598

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [51]

    Scaling studies of QCD with the dynamical HISQ action

    A. Bazavov et al. (MILC), Phys. Rev.D82, 074501 (2010),1004.0342

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition

    A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev.D85, 054503 (2012), 1111.1710

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    Results for light pseudoscalar mesons

    A. Bazavov et al. (MILC), PoSLATTICE2010, 074 (2010),1012.0868

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  54. [54]

    The QCD Equation of State to $\mathcal{O}(\mu_B^6)$ from Lattice QCD

    A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D95, 054504 (2017), 1701.04325

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    The Nf=0 heavy quark potential from short to intermediate distances

    S. Necco, R. Sommer, Nucl. Phys.B622, 328 (2002), hep-lat/0108008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  56. [56]

    Flavor Symmetry and the Static Potential with Hypercubic Blocking

    A. Hasenfratz, F. Knechtli, Phys. Rev.D64, 034504 (2001),hep-lat/0103029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  57. [57]

    Schwinger, Phys

    J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev.93, 615 (1954)

    work page 1954

  58. [58]

    Schwinger, Phys

    J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    work page 1951

  59. [59]

    Brezin, C

    E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, Phys. Rev. D2, 1191 (1970)

    work page 1970