Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 105 references

Three-wave nonlinear tides are fixed by linear tidal properties yet shift the GW phase by ~1.7 rad per star by merger.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 14:59 UTC pith:WNMW6QP5

load-bearing objection Analytic three-wave universal relations and a usable 1.7-rad phase warning are real advances; the absolute late-inspiral number is a hybrid extrapolation that needs caution. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07943 v1 pith:WNMW6QP5 submitted 2026-07-08 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Nonlinear hydrodynamics in spinning neutron stars: Theoretical universal relations and equilibrium solutions

classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE PACS 04.30.Db04.40.Dg97.60.Jd95.85.Sz
keywords binary neutron starsnonlinear tidesf-modesuniversal relationsgravitational-wave phaseaffine modeltidal deformabilityadiabatic index
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses an affine ellipsoid model of a neutron star to compute nonlinear couplings among f-modes and the radial mode up to four-wave order, including spin. It shows from first principles that the three-wave (next-to-leading-order) coupling coefficients are completely fixed by the linear Love number and f-mode frequency; they therefore introduce no new equation-of-state information. Omitting them still produces a large systematic error: for an SLy star the nonlinear correction accumulates ~1.7 rad of gravitational-wave phase relative to pure linear theory by the time the binary reaches contact; for equal-mass binaries the shift roughly doubles. A hybrid scheme that evolves the Newtonian modal equations while calibrating coefficients to match known relativistic low-frequency results is used to quantify the effect beyond the adiabatic limit. Four-wave terms remain small for slow rotators but open a window onto the adiabatic index (internal buoyancy) once the star is spun rapidly enough for f-mode resonance.

Core claim

Under the affine approximation the three-wave coupling coefficients that govern next-to-leading-order tidal dynamics are universal functions of the linear tidal parameters alone; they therefore do not probe new neutron-star physics, yet their omission produces an O(1) radian gravitational-wave phase shift by merger that must be included in waveform models.

What carries the argument

The affine model (perturbed star treated as an ellipsoid whose deformation is spanned by the l=2 f-modes and the radial mode) yields closed-form three- and four-wave coupling coefficients in a Hamiltonian truncated at fourth order in fluid displacement; the same low-dimensional parameter count then implies the universal relations that fix the three-wave coefficients from the linear tide.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid scheme assumes that Newtonian modal hydrodynamics remains a good functional description once the coupling coefficients have been rescaled to match known relativistic low-frequency results, even at neutron-star compactness.

What would settle it

A numerical-relativity binary-neutron-star simulation that isolates the nonlinear tidal phase accumulation for an SLy-like equation of state and finds a shift much smaller than ~1.7 rad (or much larger) relative to an otherwise identical linear-tide run would falsify the claimed size of the effect.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Waveform models used for third-generation detectors can absorb the three-wave correction into an effective f-mode frequency that is a known function of the linear tidal deformability, reducing parameter-space dimension.
  • Ignoring the nonlinear tide systematically biases the inferred tidal deformability at the level of several percent once many events are stacked.
  • For rapidly spinning neutron stars the four-wave centrifugal and anharmonic terms become measurable probes of the adiabatic index, a quantity inaccessible to linear and three-wave tides.
  • Resonance locking of the f-mode itself is theoretically excluded; any observed linear growth of tidal spin after resonance is already present in linear theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the three-wave coefficients are universal, any residual scatter between measured p2A and the predicted function of λ A would signal physics outside the affine (large-scale, nearly incompressible) sector—e.g., composition gradients or crustal effects.
  • The same hybrid calibration procedure can be re-used for g-mode or interface-mode nonlinearities once their linear overlaps become available, offering a systematic route to higher-order tidal templates.
  • The ~1.7 rad single-star shift implies that equal-mass BNS events will accumulate several radians of unmodelled dephasing by contact, large enough to affect both parameter estimation and tests of general relativity that rely on the late inspiral.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives nonlinear hydrodynamical couplings among f-modes and the radial mode of a spinning neutron star to four-wave (NNLO) order within the affine (ellipsoidal) approximation. From the low-dimensional parameter count of the model it obtains first-principles universal relations, most notably that the three-wave (NLO) coefficients κ_{2} and J_{2} are completely fixed by linear tidal properties (Eqs. 47–48, 64, 67–68). Equilibrium mode solutions including nonlinear frequency shifts, nonlinear driving, and an effective damping from orbital evolution are given analytically (Eq. 93) and validated against numerical integration of the Hamiltonian equations. Using a hybrid scheme that evolves the Newtonian affine EOMs while calibrating coefficients so that the low-frequency expansion matches the relativistic results of Pitre & Poisson, the authors find that NLO nonlinear tides produce a GW phase shift of ~1.7 rad (single SLy star) relative to linear theory by r = 2R_A; the shift roughly doubles for equal-mass binaries. Four-wave corrections remain small for slow spins, resonance locking of the f-mode is ruled out, and rapid anti-aligned spin is shown to open a window on Γ_ad.

Significance. If the hybrid phase-shift estimate holds at the quoted magnitude, the result is directly relevant to third-generation detector analyses: current BNS/NSBH waveforms omit NLO nonlinear tides, and a ~3 rad systematic for a typical equal-mass system would bias stacked EOS inference. The theoretical universal relations that reduce the NLO parameter space to the linear Love number (and compactness) are a clean, first-principles contribution that can be used independently of the absolute phase number. The analytic equilibrium solutions, the explicit mapping to (k_{2A}, k̈_{2A}, p_{2A}), and the demonstration that anharmonicity cannot lock the f-mode are also useful for waveform modeling and for clarifying earlier numerical claims of resonance locking. The work therefore supplies both a practical waveform systematic and a set of theoretically grounded relations that future EOB or phenomenological models can adopt.

major comments (2)
  1. The central quantitative claim (~1.7 rad for a single SLy star, Sec. IV D and Fig. 10) is obtained by evolving Newtonian affine EOMs (Eqs. 14, 79–85) whose coefficients are calibrated only so that the low-frequency expansion of κ_{22,eff} and p_{2A} recovers Pitre & Poisson (Secs. II B–C, Eqs. 70–73, 119–121). The bulk of the residual accumulates above ~600 Hz, where the Lorentzian denominator (Eq. 93), the effective damping γ_{2d} (Eq. 94), and the tidal corrections to ṛ and ω̇ become order-one; none of these structures is constrained by the low-frequency matching. The paper itself shows that the low-frequency expansion underestimates the phase by a factor ~2 (left panels of Figs. 9–10) and that PP estimates of ṛ, ω̇ fail near resonance (Figs. 3–4, 7). The absolute size of the systematic is therefore an uncontrolled extrapolation of a Newtonian functional form into the regime that actua
  2. The partition of the single relativistic coefficient p_{2A} into the two independent Newtonian combinations that enter Δω^{2} (line 84a) and ΔV (line 85a) is fixed by the Newtonian ratio (Eqs. 72–73). Beyond the low-frequency limit these two combinations are no longer degenerate, yet the paper provides no independent GR constraint on their separate values. Because the late-inspiral Lorentzian is sensitive to this split, the assumption should be stated as a free systematic and its effect on the phase residual quantified (or shown to be sub-dominant).
minor comments (5)
  1. The road map in Sec. I A is helpful but long; a short table listing the key equations (Hamiltonian, coupling coefficients, equilibrium solution, phase formula) would improve navigability.
  2. Notation for the effective damping switches between γ_mad (abstract/road map) and γ_{2d} (Eq. 94); a single symbol should be used throughout.
  3. Figs. 9–10 right panels illustrate the important distinction between phase at fixed time and phase at fixed separation; the caption or main text could state more explicitly which quantity is the relevant observable for matched filtering.
  4. The empirical compactness exponents (exp[−4(M/R)] for p_{2A}, exp[−(M/R)] for κ_{2}, J_{2}) are introduced without a theoretical derivation; a short remark on why a pure exponential is expected (or a reference to future PN work) would strengthen Sec. II B.
  5. Typos: “structral” (p. 6), “dephasing” vs “phase shift” used interchangeably in places; a light copy-edit pass is warranted.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: affine universal relations follow by parameter counting and explicit algebra; the 1.7 rad phase is a dynamical computation after external low-frequency calibration, not forced by construction.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. II B, Eq. (67) and surrounding text; also Eq. (68)]
    "we empirically find that Eq. (64) is modified as p2A = 20/7 k̈2A exp[-4(MA/RA)]. … Using an average between n=1 and n=0.5 polytropes, we find that log p̅2A = 1.933 + 1.622 log λ̅A - 6.676 imes10-4 (log λ̅A)2."

    The exponential prefactor and the subsequent log-p̅ vs log-λ̅ fit are constructed by matching the very p2A and k̈2A tables of Pitre & Poisson that later serve as calibration targets. For those polytropic models the GR-extended “universal relation” therefore holds by construction of the fit; the relation is then applied to SLy to obtain the numerical coefficients that enter the 1.7 rad calculation. The circularity is mild (external tables, not the paper’s own waveform residuals) and does not force the dynamical phase residual itself.

full rationale

The three-wave coefficients κ2 and J2 are derived algebraically from the affine energies (Eqs. 35–36 expanded to cubic order) and expressed solely in terms of the linear quantities If and ωf0 (Eqs. 47–48); the relation p2A = (20/7) k̈2A then follows identically in the Newtonian limit (Eq. 64). This is transparent model reduction, not a circular definition of the phase shift. The hybrid calibration (Sec. II C, Eqs. 70–73) rescales those coefficients so the low-frequency expansion of κ22,eff and p2A exactly recovers the external relativistic results of Pitre & Poisson; the subsequent numerical integration of the Newtonian EOMs (Eqs. 14, 79–85) and extraction of Δφ gw (Sec. IV D, Fig. 10) is an independent dynamical calculation whose high-frequency content is not constrained by the fit. The empirical exp[-4(M/R)] factor (Eq. 67) is a post-hoc match to the same external tables and is used only to extend the relation; it does not redefine the phase residual. Self-citations to prior Yu et al. works supply the Newtonian hydro framework and mode solutions but are not invoked as uniqueness theorems that force the present claims. The absolute size of the 1.7 rad residual is therefore an extrapolation risk, not a circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the affine ellipsoid truncation, a hybrid Newtonian-plus-calibrated-GR scheme, and two empirical exponential compactness scalings. Free parameters are the usual stellar structure inputs (Γ, Γ_ad, M/R) plus the calibration constants that map Newtonian couplings onto relativistic Love numbers. No new particles or forces are invented; the ‘entities’ are modeling constructs (affine modes, effective damping γ_mad).

free parameters (4)
  • empirical compactness exponent α≈4 in p_2A = (20/7)¨k_2A exp[−4(M_A/R_A)] = −4
    Chosen to match Pitre & Poisson tables across polytropes; not derived from first principles.
  • partition ratio of p_2A into κ_2 and J_2 = Newtonian ratio
    Assumed to preserve the Newtonian ratio (Eqs. 72–73) because only the combination p_2A is constrained relativistically.
  • Γ_ad (or ω_r) = 2.0 or 2.5 in examples
    Free nuclear-physics parameter that first appears at four-wave order and in centrifugal drive; varied by hand in Sec. III C.
  • fiducial compactness and Love numbers for SLy / Γ=2 models = 0.17, k_2A≈0.056–0.084
    M_A/R_A=0.17, k_2A=0.056 (Γ=2) or 0.084 (SLy) taken as representative; phase-shift numbers scale with these choices.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Affine approximation: fluid displacement is linear in coordinates, so the star remains an ellipsoid (Eq. 9).
    Exact only for incompressible fluids; used throughout to obtain closed-form couplings.
  • domain assumption One-mode truncation: only l=2 f-modes and the radial mode are retained; g-modes, inertial modes, and interface modes are ignored.
    Stated in Introduction; limits the claim that ‘nonlinear tides’ are fully captured.
  • ad hoc to paper Hybrid dynamics: Newtonian equations of motion remain valid at M/R~0.17 once coefficients are calibrated to low-frequency GR.
    Core of Sec. II C; functional form is not re-derived in GR.
  • domain assumption Constant polytropic and adiabatic indices Γ, Γ_ad throughout the star.
    Standard for affine models; enters all universal relations.
  • domain assumption Aligned or anti-aligned spin only; no precession.
    Stated after Eq. 15; simplifies Coriolis and centrifugal terms.
  • domain assumption Energy loss given by the Newtonian quadrupole formula with Burke–Thorne accelerations.
    Eq. 141; used for all phase-shift estimates.
invented entities (2)
  • effective damping γ_mad (or γ_2d) from orbital evolution independent evidence
    purpose: Captures the dynamical lag of the equilibrium tide caused by ˙r and ˙ω; essential near resonance.
    Standard in the dynamical-tide literature (Lai 1994, Yu+2024) but here must be evaluated with tidal back-reaction, which is only partially closed.
  • hybrid calibrated coupling set (I_f, ω_f0, κ_2, J_2, …) no independent evidence
    purpose: Bridge Newtonian affine hydrodynamics to relativistic low-frequency Love numbers.
    Constructed in Sec. II C; not an independent physical object.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 50203 in / 3717 out tokens · 40391 ms · 2026-07-10T14:59:46.954147+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study tides during the inspiral of a binary neutron star (BNS) system, including nonlinear hydrodynamical interactions. Using an affine approximation that treats the perturbed NS as an ellipsoid, we analytically derive coupling coefficients among the f-modes and the radial mode to the four-wave order (i.e., next-to-next-to-leading order) in the Hamiltonian, allowing for arbitrary rotation of the background star. Our model reveals a series of universal relations from first-principles arguments. Besides the well-known relations, we show that the three-wave (next-to-leading-order) interaction coefficients are fully determined by the properties of the linear tide. Therefore, they do not probe new physics of the NS. Nonetheless, not including the three-wave nonlinear tides can lead to significant systematic errors in the gravitational waveform. We support this claim via a hybrid approach that simultaneously captures mode resonances expected in Newtonian hydrodynamics and is consistent with relativistic calculations in the low-frequency expansion. The nonlinear tide in a single NS can cause a phase shift of around 1.7 radians accumulated up to merger compared to the linear tide model; for a binary of similar masses, the phase shift is approximately doubled. Our calculation extends to four-wave interactions, which, for a slowly spinning NS, provide only small corrections and are subdominant compared to the tidal back-reaction on the orbit. For a rapidly rotating NS, the nonlinear centrifugal drive of the f-mode and the four-wave anharmonicity provides a window to study the adiabatic exponent related to internal buoyancy that cannot be probed by the linear and three-wave tides in slowly spinning systems. The anharmonicity cannot lead to resonance locking of the f-mode.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07943 by Amlan Nanda, Fabian Gittins, Giorgio Nicolini, Hang Yu, K.J. Kwon, Nils Andersson, Pantelis Pnigouras, Shu Yan Lau, Tejaswi Venumadhav.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Comparison of the calculated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left: Comparison of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Amplitude of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Top: numerical solutions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Tidal phase shifts for NS models with different Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Comparison between analytical and numerical calculations of the effective Love number. The background [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Comparison of non-PP energies driven by radial (gray) and tangential (i.e., tidal torque; yellow) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: GW phase shift for a relativistic Γ = 2, non-spinning polytrope. The left panel shows the frequency-domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: GW phase shift caused by relativistic SLy NSs (parameters same as Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 76 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    We have reducedc 0 andc r in the nonlinear couplings by their linear solutions while keeping theb ±2 terms

    + r 3π 10 J2(b2 +b ∗ −2 +b −2 +b ∗ 2)ϵA − 2π 5 If(J2 + 2If κ2)ϵ2 A − 8π 15 [If(J2 + 2κ2If + √ 5J2r) + √ 5Ir(J2r + 4κ2rIf)]ϵA Ω2 A ω2 A − 8π 45 h If J2 + 2κ2If + 2 √ 5Jr2 + 2 √ 5Ir(J2r + 4κ2rIf) i Ω4 A ω4 A .(82b) Again, we write the linear tide solution in line (82a) and the nonlinear corrections in line (82b). We have reducedc 0 andc r in the nonlinear c...

  2. [2]

    When one seeks a perturbative solution, theb±2 terms appearing in ∆ω2/ωf0 can be replaced by their linear solution

    (84b) −2 r 6π 5 (κ2J2 +κ 2rJ2r)(b2 +b ∗ −2 + 2b−2 + 2b∗ 2)ϵA − π 5 3J 2 2 + 3J 2 2r −8κ 2If J2 + 8κ2rIf J2r −4I 2 f(4κ2 2 −4κ 2 2r −3ζ 20) ϵ2 A + 16π 15 h I2 f(4κ2 2 −4κ 2 2r −3ζ 20) + 2If(κ2J2 + √ 5κ2Jr2 −κ 2rJ2r) +2 √ 5Ir(κ2J2r + 4κ2κ2rIf + 3ζ20rIf) i ϵA Ω2 A ω2 A + 16π 45 h I2 f(4κ2 2 −4κ 2 2r −3ζ 20) + 2If(κ2J2 + 2 √ 5κ2Jr2 −κ 2rJ2r) + 4 √ 5If Ir(4κ2κ...

  3. [3]

    term to the left hand side, we then obtain q2e2iϕ =b 2 +b ∗ −2 ≃ 2ω2 f0(V2 + ∆V2) ϖ2 ,(88) where ϖ2 =ω 2 f0(1 + ∆ω2 2/ω2 f0)−4[ω−(1 +C f)ΩA]2,(89) which describes the nonlinearly corrected denominator of a Lorentzian. To determineb ±2 individually, we then use ˙q2 = ˙c2 + ˙c−2 =−iω f0(c2 −c ∗ −2)−2i(1 +C f)Ωq2 ≃ −2iωq 2.(90) Compared to what was derived i...

  4. [4]

    However, Eq

    = 1 2 d(∆ω2 2) ω2 f0 ≃4 [ω−(1 +C f)ΩA]dω ω2 f0 .(104) In other words, the nonlinear anharmonic shift of the mode frequency needs to match the evolution of the tidal forcing frequency to keepϖ 2 slow-varying [85]. However, Eq. (103), especially the last equality, shows that the anharmonic f-mode frequency decreases as the orbital separation decreases and t...

  5. [5]

    Plugging in the equilibrium solutions of the modes from Sec

    +J 2r(cr +c ∗ r)](c2 +c ∗ −2) (110) One can further replacec ±2 byb ±2 to get the moment in a frame corotating with the orbit. Plugging in the equilibrium solutions of the modes from Sec. III A, we can write, in the low-frequency limit k22,eff = 1 + X i,j k (ωiΩj A) 22,eff ωiΩj A ωi+j A .(111a) Note that in the equation above, we useiandjto indicate the p...

  6. [6]

    + 1 2[−J2(c0 +c ∗ 0)2 + 2J2(c2 +c ∗ −2)(c−2 +c ∗

  7. [7]

    + 2J2r(c0 +c ∗ 0)(cr +c ∗ r)].(115) Solving the corresponding effective Love number perturbatively toϵ 2 A, we have k20,eff = 1 + 2 3 Mt MB Ω2 A ω2 −2 r π 5 (3J2 + 4κ2If) MB Mt ω2 ω2 A + 4√π 15 3 √ 5J2 + 4 √ 5κ2If + 10Jr2 + 40κ2rIr + 20 Ir If J2r Ω2 A ω2 A + 4√π 45 3 √ 5J2 + 4 √ 5κ2If + 20Jr2 + 80κ2rIr + 20 Ir If J2r Mt MB Ω2 A ω2 Ω2 A ω2 A (116) Note tha...

  8. [8]

    +J 2r(cr +c ∗ r)][(c2 +c ∗ −2)e2iϕ + (c−2 +c ∗ 2)e−2iϕ] +W0[−1 2 J2(c0 +c ∗ 0)2 +J 2(c2 +c ∗ −2)(c−2 +c ∗

  9. [9]

    ERDF A way of making Europe

    +J 2r(c0 +c ∗ 0)(cr +c ∗ r)] ,(123) where in the last equality we have explicitly written down the tidal interaction Hamiltonian in terms of canonical variablesr, ϕ, c a, i(EA/ωa0)c∗ a. We can also introduce Etide =− 1 2 kr,effλAEijEij =−3M 2 Bκr,eff λA r6 .(124) whose numerical value is the same asH tide. However,H tide (a function of canonical variables...

  10. [10]

    J. M. Lattimer, The Nuclear Equation of State and Neutron Star Masses, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 62, 485 (2012), arXiv:1305.3510 [nucl-th]

  11. [11]

    H. O. Silva, A. M. Holgado, A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, and N. Yunes, Astrophysical and Theoretical Physics Implications from Multimessenger Neutron Star Observations, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 181101 (2021), arXiv:2004.01253 [gr-qc]

  12. [12]

    ´E. ´E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron-star tidal Love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

  13. [13]

    Improved resummation of post-Newtonian multipolar waveforms from circularized compact binaries

    T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and A. Nagar, Improved resummation of post-Newtonian multipolar waveforms from circularized compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D79, 064004 (2009), arXiv:0811.2069 [gr-qc]

  14. [14]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D80, 084018 (2009), arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]

  15. [15]

    Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral

    T. Hinderer, B. D. Lackey, R. N. Lang, and J. S. Read, Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral, Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010), arXiv:0911.3535 [astro-ph.HE]

  16. [16]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and G. Faye, Effective action approach to higher-order relativistic tidal interactions in binary systems and their effective one body description, Phys. Rev. D85, 124034 (2012), arXiv:1202.3565 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    Measurability of the tidal polarizability of neutron stars in late-inspiral gravitational-wave signals

    T. Damour, A. Nagar, and L. Villain, Measurability of the tidal polarizability of neutron stars in late-inspiral gravitational- wave signals, Phys. Rev. D85, 123007 (2012), arXiv:1203.4352 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    Gravitational self-force corrections to two-body tidal interactions and the effective one-body formalism

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Gravitational self-force corrections to two-body tidal interactions and the effective one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D90, 124037 (2014), arXiv:1409.6933 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Modeling the complete gravitational wave spectrum of neutron star mergers

    S. Bernuzzi, T. Dietrich, and A. Nagar, Modeling the Complete Gravitational Wave Spectrum of Neutron Star Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 091101 (2015), arXiv:1504.01764 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach

    T. Hinderer, A. Taracchini, F. Foucart, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. Duez, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, B. Szilagyi, K. Hotokezaka, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata, and C. W. Carpenter, Effects of Neutron-Star Dynamic Tides on 35 Gravitational Waveforms within the Effective-One-Body Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 181101 (2016), arXiv:1602.00599 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Dynamical Tides in General Relativity: Effective Action and Effective-One-Body Hamiltonian

    J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno, and A. Taracchini, Dynamical tides in general relativity: Effective action and effective-one-body Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. D94, 104028 (2016), arXiv:1608.01907 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects

    A. Nagar, S. Bernuzzi, W. Del Pozzo, G. Riemenschneider, S. Akcay, G. Carullo, P. Fleig, S. Babak, K. W. Tsang, M. Colleoni, F. Messina, G. Pratten, D. Radice, P. Rettegno, M. Agathos, E. Fauchon-Jones, M. Hannam, S. Husa, T. Dietrich, P. Cerd´ a-Duran, J. A. Font, F. Pannarale, P. Schmidt, and T. Damour, Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational wavef...

  23. [23]

    The sum of Love: Exploring the effective tidal deformability of neutron stars

    N. Andersson and P. Pnigouras, Exploring the effective tidal deformability of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D101, 083001 (2020), arXiv:1906.08982 [astro-ph.HE]

  24. [24]

    S. Ma, H. Yu, and Y. Chen, Excitation of f -modes during mergers of spinning binary neutron star, Phys. Rev. D101, 123020 (2020), arXiv:2003.02373 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Fast, faithful, frequency-domain effective-one-body waveforms for compact binary coalescences

    R. Gamba, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, Fast, faithful, frequency-domain effective-one-body waveforms for compact binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D104, 084058 (2021), arXiv:2012.00027 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Analytically improved and numerical-relativity informed effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars

    R. Gamba, M. Breschi, S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, W. Cook, G. Doulis, F. Fabbri, N. Ortiz, A. Poudel, A. Rashti, W. Tichy, and M. Ujevic, Analytically improved and numerical-relativity informed effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2307.15125 (2023), arXiv:2307.15125 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, H. O. Silva, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, Gravitoelectric dynamical tides at second post- Newtonian order, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 67 (2023), arXiv:2304.02030 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, H. O. Silva, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, Renormalizing Love: tidal effects at the third post- Newtonian order, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 188 (2024), arXiv:2308.01865 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    General relativistic dynamical tides in binary inspirals, without modes

    T. Pitre and E. Poisson, General relativistic dynamical tides in binary inspirals without modes, Phys. Rev. D109, 064004 (2024), arXiv:2311.04075 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Rotating Love: The dynamical tides of spinning Newtonian stars

    P. Pnigouras, F. Gittins, A. Nanda, N. Andersson, and D. I. Jones, The dynamical tides of spinning Newtonian stars, MNRAS527, 8409 (2024), arXiv:2205.07577 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    H. Yu, P. Arras, and N. N. Weinberg, Dynamical tides during the inspiral of rapidly spinning neutron stars: Solutions beyond mode resonance, Phys. Rev. D110, 024039 (2024), arXiv:2404.00147 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    Dissipative tidal effects to next-to-leading order and constraints on the dissipative tidal deformability using gravitational wave data

    R. Abhishek Hegade K., J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Dissipative tidal effects to next-to-leading order and constraints on the dissipative tidal deformability using gravitational wave data, Phys. Rev. D110, 044041 (2024), arXiv:2407.02584 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Dynamical neutron-star tides: The signature of a mode resonance

    P. Pnigouras, N. Andersson, F. Gittins, and A. R. Counsell, Dynamical neutron star tides: the signature of a mode resonance, MNRAS542, 1375 (2025), arXiv:2508.06416 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides

    H. Yu and S. Y. Lau, Effective-one-body model for coalescing binary neutron stars: Incorporating tidal spin and enhanced radiation from dynamical tides, Phys. Rev. D111, 084029 (2025), arXiv:2501.13064 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    Haberland, A

    M. Haberland, A. Buonanno, and J. Steinhoff, Modeling matter(s) in SEOBNRv5THM: Generating fast and ac- curate effective-one-body waveforms for spin-aligned binary neutron stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.18934 (2025), arXiv:2503.18934 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Z. Miao, X. Feng, Z. Pan, and H. Yang, Relativistic excitation of compact stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.23176 (2025), arXiv:2506.23176 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    A. H. K. R., K. J. Kwon, T. Venumadhav, H. Yu, and N. Yunes, The Good, the Bad, and the Subtle: Relativistic mode sums for neutron-star tidal response, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2605.08569 (2026), arXiv:2605.08569 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    H. Yu, N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, J. Kwon, and T. Venumadhav, Beyond the linear tide: impact of the non-linear tidal response of neutron stars on gravitational waveforms from binary inspirals, MNRAS519, 4325 (2023), arXiv:2211.07002 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    Bretz and H

    J. Bretz and H. Yu, Impact on Inferred Neutron Star Equation of State due to Nonlinear Hydrodynamics, Background Spin, and Relativity, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.04951 (2026), arXiv:2602.04951 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspirals

    T. Pitre and E. Poisson, Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084017 (2025), arXiv:2506.08722 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    P. Pani, M. M. Riva, L. Santoni, N. Savi´ c, and F. Vernizzi, Nonlinear Relativistic Tidal Response of Neutron Stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.14663 (2025), arXiv:2512.14663 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Carter and J

    B. Carter and J. P. Luminet, Tidal compression of a star by a large black hole. I Mechanical evolution and nuclear energy release by proton capture, A&A121, 97 (1983)

  43. [43]

    Carter and J

    B. Carter and J. P. Luminet, Mechanics of the affine star model, MNRAS212, 23 (1985)

  44. [44]

    D. Lai, F. A. Rasio, and S. L. Shapiro, Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium: Compressible Models, ApJS88, 205 (1993)

  45. [45]

    D. Lai, F. A. Rasio, and S. L. Shapiro, Hydrodynamic Instability and Coalescence of Binary Neutron Stars, ApJ420, 811 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9304027 [astro-ph]

  46. [46]

    D. Lai, F. A. Rasio, and S. L. Shapiro, Equilibrium, Stability, and Orbital Evolution of Close Binary Systems, ApJ423, 344 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9307032 [astro-ph]

  47. [47]

    A Semi-relativistic Model for Tidal Interactions in BH-NS Coalescing Binaries

    V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, and F. Pannarale, A semi-relativistic model for tidal interactions in BH-NS coalescing binaries, Classical and Quantum Gravity26, 125004 (2009), arXiv:0801.2911 [astro-ph]

  48. [48]

    Tidal interaction in compact binaries: a post-Newtonian affine framework

    V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, and A. Maselli, Tidal interaction in compact binaries: A post-Newtonian affine framework, Phys. Rev. D85, 044045 (2012), arXiv:1111.6607 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    H. Yu, S. Y. Lau, E. Mckeever, P. Arras, and N. N. Weinberg, Dynamical tide modified Roche limit in eccentric, asyn- chronous binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.20183 (2025), arXiv:2508.20183 [astro-ph.EP]. 36

  50. [50]

    Van Hoolst and P

    T. Van Hoolst and P. Smeyers, Non-linear, non-radial, isentropic oscillations of stars: Third-order coupled-mode equations, A&A279, 417 (1993)

  51. [51]

    Van Hoolst, Nonlinear, nonradial, isentropic oscillations of stars: Hamiltonian formalism, A&A286, 879 (1994)

    T. Van Hoolst, Nonlinear, nonradial, isentropic oscillations of stars: Hamiltonian formalism, A&A286, 879 (1994)

  52. [52]

    A. K. Schenk, P. Arras, ´E. ´E. Flanagan, S. A. Teukolsky, and I. Wasserman, Nonlinear mode coupling in rotating stars and the r-mode instability in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D65, 024001 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0101092 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, E. Quataert, and J. Burkart, Nonlinear Tides in Close Binary Systems, ApJ751, 136 (2012), arXiv:1107.0946 [astro-ph.SR]

  54. [54]

    The stability of tidally deformed neutron stars to three- and four-mode coupling

    T. Venumadhav, A. Zimmerman, and C. M. Hirata, The Stability of Tidally Deformed Neutron Stars to Three- and Four-mode Coupling, ApJ781, 23 (2014), arXiv:1307.2890 [astro-ph.HE]

  55. [55]

    N. N. Weinberg, Growth Rate of the Tidal p-Mode g-Mode Instability in Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars, ApJ819, 109 (2016), arXiv:1509.06975 [astro-ph.SR]

  56. [56]

    T. K. Chan, Y. H. Sham, P. T. Leung, and L. M. Lin, Multipolar universal relations between f -mode frequency and tidal deformability of compact stars, Phys. Rev. D90, 124023 (2014), arXiv:1408.3789 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    Y.-H. Sham, T. K. Chan, L.-M. Lin, and P. T. Leung, Unveiling the Universality of I-Love-Q Relations, ApJ798, 121 (2015), arXiv:1410.8271 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, G. Pappas, N. Yunes, and T. A. Apostolatos, Why i-love-q: Explaining why universality emerges in compact objects, Phys. Rev. D90, 063010 (2014)

  59. [59]

    I-Love-Q

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, I-Love-Q: Unexpected Universal Relations for Neutron Stars and Quark Stars, Science341, 365 (2013), arXiv:1302.4499 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Approximate Universal Relations for Neutron Stars and Quark Stars

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars, Phys. Rep.681, 1 (2017), arXiv:1608.02582 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Punturo, M

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Beker, N. Beveridge, S. Birindelli, S. Bose, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, T. Bulik, E. Calloni, G. Cella, E. C. Mottin, S. Chelkowski, A. Chincarini, J. Clark, E. Coccia, C. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming, L. Cunningham, E. Cuoco, S. Danili...

  62. [62]

    A. Abac, R. Abramo, S. Albanesi, A. Albertini, A. Agapito, M. Agathos, C. Albertus, N. Andersson, and et al., The Science of the Einstein Telescope, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.12263 (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

  63. [63]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, K. Ackley, C. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, and et al., Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors, Classical and Quantum Gravity34, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]

  64. [64]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Barsotti, G. Billingsley, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, D. Coyne, R. Eisenstein, M. Evans, P. Fritschel, E. D. Hall, A. Lazzarini, G. Lovelace, J. Read, B. S. Sathyaprakash, D. Shoemaker, J. Smith, C. Torrie, S. Vitale, R. Weiss, C. Wipf, and M. Zucker, Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wa...

  65. [65]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evans, R. X. Adhikari, C. Afle, S. W. Ballmer, S. Biscoveanu, S. Borhanian, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, and et al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2109.09882 (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

  66. [66]

    K. J. Kwon, H. Yu, and T. Venumadhav, Resonance Locking of Anharmonicg-Modes in Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.03831 (2024), arXiv:2410.03831 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    K. J. Kwon, H. Yu, and T. Venumadhav, Resonance locking: radian-level phase shifts due to nonlinear hydrodynamics of g-modes in merging neutron star binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.11837 (2025), arXiv:2503.11837 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, and J. Burkart, An Instability due to the Nonlinear Coupling of p-modes to g-modes: Implications for Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries, ApJ769, 121 (2013), arXiv:1302.2292 [astro-ph.SR]

  69. [69]

    Impact of the tidal p-g instability on the gravitational wave signal from coalescing binary neutron stars

    R. Essick, S. Vitale, and N. N. Weinberg, Impact of the tidal p -g instability on the gravitational wave signal from coalescing binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D94, 103012 (2016), arXiv:1609.06362 [astro-ph.HE]

  70. [70]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, N. N. Weinberg, and et al., Constraining the p -Mode-g -Mode Tidal Instability with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 061104 (2019), arXiv:1808.08676 [astro-ph.HE]

  71. [71]

    ´E. ´E. Flanagan and ´E. Racine, Gravitomagnetic resonant excitation of Rossby modes in coalescing neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D75, 044001 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0601029 [gr-qc]

  72. [72]

    S. Ma, H. Yu, and Y. Chen, Detecting resonant tidal excitations of Rossby modes in coalescing neutron-star binaries with 37 third-generation gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D103, 063020 (2021), arXiv:2010.03066 [gr-qc]

  73. [73]

    P. K. Gupta, J. Steinhoff, and T. Hinderer, Relativistic effective action of dynamical gravitomagnetic tides for slowly rotating neutron stars, Physical Review Research3, 013147 (2021), arXiv:2011.03508 [gr-qc]

  74. [74]

    P. K. Gupta, J. Steinhoff, and T. Hinderer, Effect of dynamical gravitomagnetic tides on measurability of tidal parameters for binary neutron stars using gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D108, 124040 (2023), arXiv:2302.11274 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]

    Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts

    D. Tsang, J. S. Read, T. Hinderer, A. L. Piro, and R. Bondarescu, Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 011102 (2012), arXiv:1110.0467 [astro-ph.HE]

  76. [76]

    Z. Pan, Z. Lyu, B. Bonga, N. Ortiz, and H. Yang, Probing Crust Meltdown in Inspiraling Binary Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 201102 (2020), arXiv:2003.03330 [astro-ph.HE]

  77. [77]

    Dynamical tides in neutron stars: The impact of the crust

    A. Passamonti, N. Andersson, and P. Pnigouras, Dynamical tides in neutron stars: the impact of the crust, MNRAS504, 1273 (2021), arXiv:2012.09637 [astro-ph.HE]

  78. [78]

    J. S. Read, B. D. Lackey, B. J. Owen, and J. L. Friedman, Constraints on a phenomenologically parametrized neutron-star equation of state, Phys. Rev. D79, 124032 (2009), arXiv:0812.2163 [astro-ph]

  79. [79]

    A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, A&A380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092 [astro-ph]

  80. [80]

    Lai, Resonant Oscillations and Tidal Heating in Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars, MNRAS270, 611 (1994), arXiv:astro- ph/9404062 [astro-ph]

    D. Lai, Resonant Oscillations and Tidal Heating in Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars, MNRAS270, 611 (1994), arXiv:astro- ph/9404062 [astro-ph]

Showing first 80 references.