Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 28 references

This paper derives first-order noncommutative corrections to the Einstein-crystal partition function, internal energy, and specific heat, and turns the requirement that these stay physical into bounds on the deformation parameter.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 22:27 UTC pith:FCGCF43Y

load-bearing objection Reproducible thermodynamics for Snyder/Einstein crystals, but a false convergence condition and an uncontrolled low-T expansion gut the headline bounds on zeta. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15760 v1 pith:FCGCF43Y submitted 2026-07-17 gr-qc cond-mat.mtrl-scihep-thquant-ph

Einstein crystals in Snyder and Snyder-de Sitter noncommutative backgrounds

Anna Pacho\l , Aneta Wojnar This is my paper
classification gr-qc cond-mat.mtrl-scihep-thquant-ph
keywords Einstein crystalSnyder modelSnyder-de Sitter modelgeneralized uncertainty principle (GUP)generalized extended uncertainty principle (GEUP)partition functionspecific heatnoncommutative spacetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to show that in Snyder and Snyder-de Sitter noncommutative backgrounds, the standard Einstein model of a crystal is modified: the partition function, internal energy, and specific heat acquire corrections proportional to the deformation parameter. Working to first order in that parameter, the authors find that positivity of the partition function and of the specific heat imposes constraints on the deformation parameter, which for a diamond crystal translate into bounds like ζ > -1.2×10^43 T at low temperatures (Maggiore realization). If correct, this means table-top measurements of crystal thermodynamics could in principle probe space-time noncommutativity. The corrections are temperature-dependent and can drive specific heat negative if the deformation parameter is too large.

Core claim

The paper claims that a deformed commutation relation [x,p]=iℏ(1+θ p²) (Snyder/GUP) and its (anti-)Snyder-de Sitter generalization [x,p]=iℏ(1+αx²+ζp²+√(αζ)(xp+px)) (GEUP) change the energy spectrum of a harmonic oscillator from En = ℏω(n+1/2) to En = ℏω[(n+1/2)(1+A)+(n²+n+1/2)A], with A = (1/2)μℏωθ in the Snyder case and B = (1/2)ℏμ(ζω+α/ω) in the SdS case. From this spectrum the paper derives the partition function to first order in A or B and, for a 3D Einstein crystal, obtains the internal energy U = (3Nℏω/2)coth(ℏω/2kBT) + corrections and specific heat C_V with an analogous correction term. Requiring Z>0 and 0<C_V/(3Nk_B)<1 gives allowed ranges for ζ (and for ζ+α/ω² in the SdS case), eva

What carries the argument

The central object is the deformed harmonic-oscillator partition function Z = Σ exp(-βE_n) with E_n = ℏω[(n+1/2)(1+A)+(n²+n+1/2)A], expanded to first order in the deformation parameter A (or B) after approximating sqrt(1+A²)≈1. The partition function becomes Z = e^{-βℏω/2} [ e^{βℏω}/(e^{βℏω}-1) - A βℏω e^{βℏω}(e^{βℏω}+1)²/(2(e^{βℏω}-1)³) ]. Its logarithm and temperature derivatives yield the internal energy and specific heat corrections; the requirement that Z and C_V stay positive turns into inequalities that bound the deformation parameter. The parameter A = (1/2)μℏωζ(3ξ-1/2) encodes the realization of the Snyder model; B = (1/2)ℏμ(ζω+α/ω) does the same for SdS.

Load-bearing premise

The entire calculation expands the Boltzmann factor to first order in the deformation parameter and assumes that first-order truncation stays valid at all temperatures, including the low-temperature regime where the correction term Aℏω/(kBT) becomes large; if that expansion breaks down, the derived bounds on ζ do not follow.

What would settle it

Compute the exact partition function Σ exp[-βℏω((n+1/2)(1+A)+(n²+n+1/2)A)] numerically for a fixed A and compare with the first-order expression (11); wherever the difference exceeds the first-order term, the paper's bounds and the C_V corrections lose their quantitative meaning. Alternatively, a high-precision measurement of diamond's specific heat at T ~ 20-300 K showing no deviation from the standard Einstein curve at the level of the predicted A-correction would falsify the claimed bounds for the corresponding deformation scale.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The specific heat of a crystal acquires a calculable, temperature-dependent correction proportional to A; at high T it suppresses C_V below the Dulong-Petit value, at low T it accelerates the exponential falloff.
  • Positivity of the partition function places constraints on ζ; for diamond and the Maggiore realization ζ must be > -1.2×10^43 T (low T) and ζ < 6.6×10^45 (from convergence).
  • In the SdS/GEUP case the bound applies to the combination ζ + α/ω² and is frequency-dependent, so one could vary the oscillator frequency to separate the two parameters.
  • If the bound is violated, the model predicts a negative specific heat or an unphysical C_V exceeding the classical limit, marking the breakdown of the thermodynamic description.
  • The undeformed limit (ζ→0, α→0) recovers the standard Einstein-crystal results, so the corrections are a well-defined extension.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strongest low-temperature bounds (13)-(14) come from the regime where the expansion parameter Aℏω/(kBT) diverges; a resummation of the full series would likely soften or shift those bounds, so the numerical constraints should be read as indicative rather than final.
  • The paper's stated convergence condition A > -1/2 conflicts with the fact that for A<0 the spectrum (4) is unbounded below, making the partition sum diverge; requiring genuine convergence would restrict to A≥0 and reverse the sign of the allowed ζ in the low-T bounds.
  • The same formalism extends to any harmonic lattice (e.g., graphene or trapped-ion arrays) and to other thermodynamic observables such as entropy and free energy, which could sharpen the bounds with combined measurements.
  • A direct test: measure the low-temperature specific heat of diamond with high precision; any deviation from the Einstein curve with the predicted A-linear sign and temperature dependence would be a signature, while a null result would push the deformation scale beyond roughly 10^44 (in the stated units).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes Einstein-crystal thermodynamics in Snyder and Snyder-de Sitter noncommutative backgrounds. Starting from the energy spectrum (3)-(4) taken from earlier work, it derives a first-order-in-A partition function (11), imposes positivity to obtain constraints on the noncommutativity parameter ζ for diamond (Eqs. (13)-(14)), and then computes internal energy (17)-(19) and specific heat (24)-(25). Critical values of ζ from C_V=0 are given in Eqs. (27)-(29), and the analysis is extended to the Snyder-de Sitter/GEUP case with parameter B. The authors claim that noncommutativity produces calculable temperature-dependent corrections to crystal thermodynamics and that positivity and specific-heat requirements yield bounds on the deformation parameters.

Significance. The manuscript has clear strengths: the formal algebra from the partition function through U and C_V is internally consistent, the undeformed limits are correctly recovered, and the numerical application to diamond makes the proposed constraints concrete. If valid, the work would connect GUP/GEUP parameters with table-top condensed-matter observables, which is a timely and interesting direction. However, two load-bearing technical issues—an incorrect convergence condition and an uncontrolled low-temperature expansion—invalidate the headline parameter bounds. The paper therefore does not currently establish its central quantitative claims, although a corrected analysis restricted to the convergent sector could yield meaningful results.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, after Eq. (7)] The statement that the series in (7) is convergent for A > -1/2 is incorrect under the paper's own spectrum. Substituting (4), E_n = (ℏω/2)(1+A) + ℏω[n(1+A)+n^2 A]. For any A<0, the n^2 term dominates and E_n → -∞ as n→∞, so e^{-βE_n} diverges and Z does not exist. The exact series is finite only for A≥0. Therefore the negative-A portions of the bounds (13)-(14) and of Figs. 1 and 3 are invalid. In particular, for ξ=0, A=-(μℏω/4)ζ, so ζ≤0 is required; the stated upper bound ζ<6.6×10^45 is spurious. For ξ=1/2, A=(μℏω/2)ζ, so ζ≥0 is required; the lower bound ζ>-3.3×10^45 is spurious.
  2. [§2, Eqs. (9)-(11)] The first-order expansion in A of exp[-βℏω(n+n^2)A] is not uniform in n. The effective expansion parameter is βℏω A (n+n^2); for n ≳ 1/(βℏω A) the correction is O(1) even for infinitesimal A. In the low-T regime x=ℏω/(k_B T)≫1 used in (13)-(14) and in the critical-ζ analysis of Sec. 3, βℏω A is not small, so the truncated Z (11) and all constraints derived from it are truncation artifacts. A valid low-T treatment requires summing the exact series or controlling the expansion; this directly affects the paper's advertised 'stronger constraints' in the low-temperature regime.
  3. [§3, Eq. (27) and Figs. 1, 3] The critical values ζ_crit from C_V=0 are evaluated in regions affected by the two preceding issues: for ξ=0, Eq. (28) is negative and therefore lies in the divergent region A<0; for ξ=1/2, Eq. (29) is positive, but the low-T asymptotics used to discuss it require A x ≪ 1, which fails as T→0. Consequently the shaded allowed regions in Figs. 1 and 3 and the concluding statement that ζ ≈ ±10^44 is allowed are not established. The paper should re-derive the allowed parameter set using the exact partition function for A≥0 and state which bounds survive after a controlled expansion.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Footnote 2 and Appendix A] The phonon energy is quoted as 0.19 eV ~ 0.30441356046×10^{-19} J in the footnote but as 3.04×10^{-20} J in Appendix A. The latter is the correct conversion; the main-text value appears to be a decimal-point typo.
  2. [§2 and §4, Eqs. (7) and (33)] The same convergence assertion 'convergent for A > -1/2' (and B > -1/2) appears in both sections. Both statements should be corrected to reflect the actual condition A≥0 (B≥0) required by the spectrum.
  3. [Notation, §2] The variable x is used both for βℏω in (A1) and for ℏω/(k_B T) in (20) and (22). These are the same dimensionless ratio, but the notation should be defined once and used consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the thermodynamic corrections are derived from an externally imported exact oscillator spectrum; self-citations are contextual and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the assumed Snyder/SdS commutation relations (1)/(30) and imports the exact harmonic-oscillator spectrum (3)/(31) from the external papers [3] (Chang et al.) and [14] (Mignemi), neither of which is a self-citation. The paper then expands the spectrum to first order in A (Eq. 4), constructs the partition function (7), expands it (9–11), and obtains internal energy and heat capacity by standard statistical mechanics (17, 19, 24). The constraints on zeta follow from requiring Z > 0 (12, A1–A3) and C_V > 0 (26–29), i.e. self-consistency conditions of the model on its own parameter, not predictions matched to or fitted against data. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Self-citations [6] and [9] are used only for context (classification of GUP/GEUP limits and prior motivational indications from the authors' earlier work); they are not load-bearing for the partition-function algebra, which rests on external, parameter-free exact solutions with stated assumptions. Therefore no circular step is present. Separate correctness risks exist but are not circular: the assertion after Eq. (7) that the series converges for A > -1/2 is false under the paper's own spectrum (4), because for A < 0, E_n ~ hbar*omega*A*n^2 -> -infinity, making Z divergent; the correct convergence condition is A >= 0. This invalidates the negative-A bounds in (13)–(14) and Figs. 1/3. In addition, the first-order-in-A expansion used in (9)–(11), (19), (24) is not uniformly valid at low temperatures, where A*hbar*omega/(k_B*T) diverges. These are mathematical/validity defects, not circular reasoning.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated; zeta, xi, and alpha are pre-existing deformation parameters of the Snyder/SdS models. The free parameters are the theory's own deformation scales and the hand-chosen realization parameter; the diamond inputs (mu, hbar omega) are external model inputs, not fitted parameters.

free parameters (3)
  • zeta (Snyder noncommutativity/deformation parameter) = No fit; bounded by self-consistency: for xi=0, -1.2*10^43 T < zeta < 6.6*10^45; for xi=1/2, -3.3*10^45 < zeta < 5.9*10^4
    The scale of the deformed commutator (1). It is the theory's free parameter, not fitted to data; the paper's central quantitative output is the allowed range for it, derived from positivity of Z and C_V.
  • xi (Snyder realization parameter) = Hand-chosen values 0, 1/2 (and 1/6 for Weyl)
    Encodes different realizations of the Snyder model; the derived bounds (13)-(14) and the sign of the correction depend on it. It is a modeling choice, not determined by data.
  • alpha (SdS curvature parameter)
    Introduced in Sec. 4 for the GEUP case; appears only in the combination zeta+alpha/omega^2 in the bounds (36), (42), so it is never individually constrained.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Exact 1D oscillator spectrum in Snyder background, Eq. (3), imported from Chang-Minic-Okamura-Takeuchi [3].
    The entire thermodynamic derivation starts from this spectrum; the paper does not re-derive or verify its validity for negative A (anti-Snyder), which is where the later convergence error appears.
  • domain assumption Exact oscillator spectrum in (a)SdS background, Eq. (31), imported from Mignemi [14].
    Load-bearing input for Sec. 4; its derivation and validity regime are taken on faith.
  • domain assumption Einstein model of a 3D crystal: N independent oscillators with a common frequency; E_tot = 3N E_n.
    Standard textbook model; the paper relies on its low-temperature validity for diamond, though the Einstein model is known to be only qualitatively correct there (exponential rather than T^3 heat capacity).
  • ad hoc to paper First-order-in-A expansion of the Boltzmann factor and partition function is valid at all temperatures, including T -> 0.
    The expansion parameter is A*hbar omega/(kB T), which diverges at low T; the strongest constraints (13), (28) are drawn from this regime, so the premise is load-bearing and unverified.
  • ad hoc to paper The partition-function series is 'convergent for A > -1/2' (asserted after Eq. (7)).
    Asserted with 'One can show' and no proof; by the paper's own spectrum (4) the series diverges for A<0 (energies unbounded below), so the asserted condition and the bounds derived from it are wrong.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12158 in / 37626 out tokens · 276551 ms · 2026-08-01T22:27:00.917382+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the behavior of Einstein crystals in noncommutative backgrounds described by the Snyder and Snyder-de Sitter models. Possible novel effects, which may arise in realistic systems such as diamond crystals, are analyzed within a thermodynamical framework. We show that noncommutativity influences the key thermodynamic quantities, including internal energy and specific heat. These corrections can be directly related to modifications of the underlying uncertainty relations, of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) and generalized extended uncertainty principle (GEUP) types.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15760 by Aneta Wojnar, Anna Pacho\l.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 14 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Con- sequently, direct experimental access to such effects has been considered unattainable

    INTRODUCTION The conventional quantum gravity research focused for a long time on the search of quantum gravitational ef- fects at the Planck-scale (very high energies 10 19 GeV or correspondingly very small length scales 10 −35 m). Con- sequently, direct experimental access to such effects has been considered unattainable. Recently, however, sub- stantia...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Our derivation bases on the solution to the Schr¨ odinger equation obtained in the presence of the modified quantum mechanical phase space relations found in [3]

    P AR TITION FUNCTION OF A 1D OSCILLA TOR IN SNYDER (GUP) BACKGROUND Starting with the Hamiltonian of a 1D harmonic oscil- lator ˆH= 1 2 µω2 ˆx2 + 1 2µ ˆp2 we want to incorporate the modifications arising from noncommutativity (1) (or a generalized uncertainty prin- ciple (GUP) corresponding to (1)). Our derivation bases on the solution to the Schr¨ odinge...

  3. [3]

    We have taken the energy of a quantum as ℏω= 0.19eV∼0.30441356046×10 −19J while the effective mass of the oscillator is 9.96×10 −27kg

    INTERNAL ENERGY AND HEA T CAP ACITY OF 3-DIM SOLIDS Since we want to consider a 3 dimensional (3D) solid at low temperatures modeled by the Einstein crystal, let us assume that each oscillator has the same frequencyω, so the total energy of the 3D crystal withNoscillators can be expressed as 3 Etot = 3NX i=0 (En)i = 3N En,(15) 2 A diamond crystal is well ...

  4. [4]

    (ANTI-)SNYDER-DE SITTER AND THE GENERALIZED EXTENDED (GEUP) CASE As another possible extension of quantum mechan- ics one can consider a different type of noncommutative background, for example Snyder-de Sitter (SdS) model. SdS is a generalization of the Snyder model to a space- time background of constant curvature which includes both noncommutative coor...

  5. [5]

    Such models are often linked to phenomenolog- ical effects of quantum theories of gravity via e.g

    CONCLUSIONS The aim of this paper was to propose an investigation into how low-energy consequences of modified quantum phase space models could be identified in table-top exper- iments. Such models are often linked to phenomenolog- ical effects of quantum theories of gravity via e.g. GUP or GEUP models. 6 in the same shortcut notationy= 1 x = kB T ℏω andx...

    2022

  6. [6]

    A. Pacho l. Generalized Extended Uncertainty Principles, Liouville theorem and density of states: Snyder-de Sitter and Yang models. Nucl. Phys. B, 1010:116771, 2025, arXiv:2409.05110

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    H. S. Snyder. Quantized space-time. Physical Review, 71(1):38, 1947

    1947

  8. [8]

    M. V. Battisti and S. Meljanac. Scalar Field Theory on Non-commutative Snyder Space-Time. Phys. Rev. D, 82:024028, 2010, arXiv:1003.2108

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Here we focus on the GUP (and later GEUP)-induced modifications to the energy spectrum of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, following [16] (and

    and in [15]. Here we focus on the GUP (and later GEUP)-induced modifications to the energy spectrum of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, following [16] (and

  10. [10]

    for a recent overview of various approaches. In this context, the first type of realization (ξ= 1/2), leads to the standard quadratic GUP (QGUP) relations, while the second one (ξ= 0) is related to the so-called higher order type GUP, see e.g. [11, 12]. One can also consider the case of modified quantum phase space (1) with the negative coupling parameter...

  11. [11]

    Pedalino, B

    S. Pedalino, B. E. Ram ´ ırez-Galindo, R. Ferstl, K. Horn- berger, M. Arndt, and S. Gerlich. Probing quantum mechanics with nanoparticle matter-wave interferometry. Nature, 649(8098):866–870, 2026

    2026

  12. [12]

    S. Bose, I. Fuentes, A. A. Geraci, S. M. Khan, S. Qvar- fort, M. Rademacher, M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, H. Ulbricht, and C. C. Wanjura. Massive quantum systems as in- terfaces of quantum mechanics and gravity. Rev. Mod. Phys., 97(1):015003, 2025, arXiv:2311.09218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi. Exact solution of the harmonic oscillator in arbitrary dimensions with minimal length uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. D, 65:125027, 2002, arXiv:hep-th/0111181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    This allows us, in particu- lar, to obtain indicative constraints on the NC parameter from the requirement of positivity of the partition func- tion

    respectively), and derive the corresponding partition function, including NC corrections up to the first order in the deformation parameter. This allows us, in particu- lar, to obtain indicative constraints on the NC parameter from the requirement of positivity of the partition func- tion. We then compute the internal energy and specific heat, and discuss...

  15. [15]

    Bawaj, C

    M. Bawaj, C. Biancofiore, M. Bonaldi, F. Bonfigli, A. Borrielli, G. Di Giuseppe, L. Marconi, F. Marino, R. Natali, A. Pontin, et al. Probing deformed commu- tators with macroscopic harmonic oscillators. Nature communications, 6(1):7503, 2015

    2015

  16. [16]

    W. M. Campbell, M. E. Tobar, M. Goryachev, and S. Galliou. Improved constraints on minimum length models with a macroscopic low loss phonon cavity. Phys- ical Review D, 108(10):102006, 2023

    2023

  17. [17]

    Pacho l and A

    A. Pacho l and A. Wojnar. Fermi equation of state with finite temperature corrections in quantum space-times approach: Snyder model vs GUP case. Class. Quant. Grav., 40(19):195021, 2023, arXiv:2304.08215

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Bosso, G

    P. Bosso, G. G. Luciano, L. Petruzziello, and F. Wag- ner. 30 years in: Quo vadis generalized uncertainty principle? Class. Quant. Grav., 40(19):195014, 2023, arXiv:2305.16193

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Maggiore

    M. Maggiore. Quantum groups, gravity and the general- ized uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. D, 49:5182–5187, 1994, arXiv:hep-th/9305163

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  20. [20]

    Segreto and G

    S. Segreto and G. Montani. Extended GUP formulation and the role of momentum cut-off. Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(5):385, 2023, arXiv:2208.03101

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    S. Mignemi. Classical and quantum mechanics of the nonrelativistic Snyder model. Phys. Rev. D, 84:025021, 2011, arXiv:1104.0490

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    S. Mignemi. Classical and quantum mechanics of the nonrelativistic Snyder model in curved space. Class. Quant. Grav., 29:215019, 2012, arXiv:1110.0201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    Riasat and B

    S. Riasat and B. P. Mandal. Effect of quantum gravity on specific heat of solid. The European Physical Journal Plus, 138(10):1–10, 2023. 10

    2023

  24. [24]

    L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi. The Effect of the minimal length uncertainty relation on the density of states and the cosmological constant problem. Phys. Rev. D, 65:125028, 2002, arXiv:hep- th/0201017

    arXiv 2002

  25. [25]

    Kozak and A

    A. Kozak and A. Wojnar. Invariant quantities of scalar–tensor theories for stellar structure. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(6):492, 2021, arXiv:2103.06601

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    A. Wojnar. Bose-Einstein condensate and liquid He4: Implications of the GUP and modified gravity cor- respondence. Phys. Rev. D, 109(12):124031, 2024, arXiv:2401.01159

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Lope-Oter and A

    E. Lope-Oter and A. Wojnar. Constraining Palatini grav- ity with GR-independent equations of state for neutron stars. JCAP, 02:017, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    A. Wojnar. When waves meet rays: Seismic vibrations and cosmic showers to test gravity. arXiv:2604.07333

    Pith/arXiv arXiv