Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 119 references

Light spectator axions can boost primordial black hole production in string inflation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 08:47 UTC pith:G66OUY7Q

load-bearing objection A solid mechanism paper: spectator axions can boost PBH production in Fibre Inflation, but the headline 'realized in string theory' rests on a corner of parameter space the authors themselves haven't constructed. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27361 v1 pith:G66OUY7Q submitted 2026-07-29 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

Spectator Axions in String Inflation and Primordial Black Holes

Michele Cicoli , Dario L. Lorenzoni , Evan McDonough , Francisco G. Pedro This is my paper
classification hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords primordial black holesstring inflationFibre Inflationspectator axionsaxion decay constantultra-slow rollcurvature power spectrumaxiverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether the two light axions that inevitably accompany Fibre Inflation—a string-theory model of inflation—change its ability to seed primordial black holes (PBHs). The authors find that for generic axion parameters the answer is no: the curvature power spectrum is essentially unchanged, so the model's PBH predictions are robust. But in a tuned corner of parameter space, an axion with a decay constant f₂ ≳ 0.1 M_Pl and an exponentially small non-perturbative prefactor can act as a dynamic spectator, enhancing the peak of the curvature power spectrum by up to an order of magnitude. This pushes a model that would otherwise fail to produce PBHs above the formation threshold, while remaining consistent with CMB observables. The result matters because it shows that string theory's ubiquitous axions can assist PBH formation and relax the fine-tuning needed in the inflaton potential.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in Fibre Inflation, the two axions θ₁ and θ₂—usually treated as frozen spectators—can, for a specific range of parameters, dramatically alter the small-scale curvature power spectrum. For decay constants far below the Planck scale (f ≪ M_Pl) the axions leave the spectrum unchanged, confirming the robustness of earlier single-field results. However, when the second axion has a larger but still sub-Planckian decay constant, f₂ ≳ 0.1 M_Pl, and the prefactor of its non-perturbative potential is exponentially small (A₂ ~ 10⁻⁶), the axion develops an inflaton-dependent mass that becomes comparable to the Hubble scale during the ultra-slow-roll phase. This triggers

What carries the argument

The central object is the low-energy effective action for Fibre Inflation including two spectator axions, with non-canonical kinetic couplings exp(−4φ/√3) and exp(+2φ/√3) and an axion potential Λ₁(φ)(1 − cos(χ₁/f₁)) + Λ₂(φ)(1 − cos(χ₂/f₂)), where the masses m_i²(φ) = Λ_i(φ)/f_i² depend exponentially on the inflaton φ and on the decay constants f_i. The key mechanism is the 'ε-floor' phase: when an axion's slow-roll parameter ε_χ exceeds the inflaton's ε_φ, the axion sets a floor for the total ε, causing the field-space trajectory to turn. The turn rate ω then sources curvature perturbations from isocurvature perturbations, and a tachyonic isocurvature mass (μ_s² < 0) amplifies the isocurvatu

Load-bearing premise

The enhancement rests on a tuned but not yet proven string vacuum: the axion decay constant f₂ ≳ 0.1–0.3 M_Pl requires a condensing gauge group of rank N₂ ~ O(10³) on a globally consistent K3-fibred Calabi-Yau, and the non-perturbative prefactor A₂ must be exponentially small (~10⁻⁶) whereas O(1) values are generally expected—the authors themselves state that 'further work is required' to establish whether such compactifications exist.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to find an explicit global K3-fibred Calabi-Yau compactification with a condensing gauge group of rank N₂ ~ 10³ and a mechanism producing A₂ ~ 10⁻⁶, or, failing that, to compute the curvature power spectrum with the natural value A₂ = O(1) and f₂ ~ 0.1 M_Pl: if no such construction exists, or if the peak stays below P_R ≈ 10⁻³, the axion-assisted PBH claim collapses.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, Fibre Inflation remains a viable string-theory framework for PBH dark matter even when its unavoidable axions are included, since generic axion parameters leave the predictions unchanged.
  • A tuned but consistent region of parameter space realizes 'axion-assisted' PBH formation, relaxing the fine-tuning of the inflaton's near-inflection point and producing asteroid-mass PBHs (≈ 2.5×10²¹ g) that could constitute dark matter.
  • The model predicts a triple set of gravitational-wave signals: vacuum tensor modes (r ≈ 0.002, within reach of next-generation CMB experiments), scalar-induced gravitational waves from the power-spectrum peak, and gravitational waves sourced by the axions themselves.
  • In the axion-assisted regime, the axions are relatively heavy (m_a ≳ 0.1 H) and may decay after inflation, implying that reheating could be governed by axion decay rather than inflaton decay—a testable cosmological consequence.
  • The isocurvature fraction β_iso ≈ 10⁻⁴ in the Success model is within current CMB bounds but provides a specific, checkable prediction for future isocurvature measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ε-floor mechanism is generic: any spectator field with an inflaton-dependent mass that crosses the Hubble scale and a kinetic coupling that grows during inflation could similarly boost PBH production, so the result may extend beyond this specific compactification to other string or axion-like models.
  • The required exponentially small prefactor A₂ ~ 10⁻⁶ could plausibly arise from a field-dependent prefactor vanishing near a special locus in complex-structure moduli space—a route the authors mention but do not develop; a concrete F-theory search for such loci would test the scenario.
  • If isocurvature constraints tighten in the future (β_iso < 10⁻⁴), the Success model's parameter window could close, making the axion-assisted mechanism observationally distinguishable from single-field PBH models.
  • The paper hints that one axion might assist PBH formation while the other could realize dark energy quintessence; this dual role, if confirmed in explicit global models, would tie early-universe PBH production to the late-time accelerated expansion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the two spectator axions of Fibre Inflation and their effect on curvature perturbations relevant to PBH formation. Starting from a type IIB compactification with Kähler moduli, the authors derive a 3-field EFT with non-minimal kinetic couplings between the inflaton and axions, and an axion potential whose mass and kinetic terms depend on the inflaton. They show numerically that for decay constants f≲0.1 M_Pl the axions do not alter the single-field power spectrum, while for f2≳0.1 M_Pl and a small non-perturbative prefactor A2 the axions can set an 'ε-floor' that slows the inflaton, induce turns in field space, create a tachyonic isocurvature mass, and source curvature perturbations on PBH scales. Their 'Success' model (Tab. 4) uses the No-PBH single-field parameters P2, rescales V0, and obtains P_R^peak=3.5×10^-3, above the nominal P_R>10^-3 threshold, while matching As, ns, r, and β_iso (Tab. 5). The authors conclude that axions can assist PBH production and that this 'effectively realizes' axion-assisted PBHs in string theory.

Significance. If the qualitative mechanism holds, the paper introduces a novel role for the string axiverse in PBH formation: spectator axions can relax the fine-tuning of the inflaton potential by setting a floor on ε and amplifying isocurvature on small scales. The quantitative work is transparent: parameters are tabulated, observables are computed with the public code PyTransport, and the authors explicitly flag the missing global string construction. However, the headline string-realization claim depends on unproven model-building (a rank O(10^3) condensing stack and A2~10^-6), and there is an internal inconsistency in the quoted A2 versus the mass parameters. With those caveats addressed, the paper would be a useful contribution to both the PBH and string inflation literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 6–7, Eq. (2.14)] The central claim that axion-assisted PBHs are 'effectively realized in string theory' rests on an unproven string corner. With ⟨τ2⟩~O(500) and f2=0.5 M_Pl, Eq. (2.14) requires a condensing stack with N2~O(10^3). The required exponentially small prefactor A2 is also outside the expected O(1) value. Sec. 7 explicitly concedes that no globally consistent K3-fibred Calabi-Yau with such a stack has been constructed, and the suggested mechanisms to suppress A2 are not demonstrated in an explicit model. The field-theoretic mechanism may be valid, but the string-realization claim is conditional. I ask the authors either to exhibit a concrete compactification/path, or to temper the conclusion to an EFT-motivated proof of principle.
  2. [Eq. (4.18), Tab. 4, Sec. 7] There is a quantitative inconsistency in the 'Success' benchmark. With M2=8×10^-7, f2=0.5, |W0|=1, and V=10^3, Eq. (4.18) gives A2 ≈ 1.5×10^-7, not A2 ≃ 10^-6 as stated in Sec. 7. Conversely, A2=10^-6 would give M2 ≈ 2.1×10^-6. Since M2/H controls the axion dynamics and thus the reported enhancement, the parameters in Tab. 4 and the prefactor quoted in Sec. 7 must be reconciled. Please report A1 and A2 explicitly for the Success model and verify that the mass parameters are those actually used in the PyTransport runs.
  3. [Sec. 6, Figs. 9–10] The quantitative claim that f2≳0.3 M_Pl can enhance the peak 'by up to one order of magnitude' is supported by a small set of illustrative spectra, all with fixed A=10^-6 and χ_i=0.1πf. No sensitivity analysis is shown around the Success benchmark (M2, f2, χ2,i, V0 rescaling), and no numerical error estimate is given. Since the PBH threshold P_R>10^-3 is steep and the quoted peak 3.5×10^-3 is only 3.5 times above it, a one-parameter scan around the benchmark would materially strengthen the robustness of the axion-assisted mechanism. As it stands, the statement is established for a hand-picked point, not as a generic feature of the model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4, Fig. 5] The description of the second phase says 'εφ ≫ εχ', which is the reverse of the defining condition εχ > εφ for the ε-floor phase (yellow band). Please correct to εχ ≫ εφ.
  2. [Eq. (2.17)] The exponential factors are typeset ambiguously. Use explicit parentheses, e.g. exp[-(1/(√2 f1)) e^{2/√3 φ}], to distinguish this from exp[-(1/√2) f1 e^{2/√3 φ}], since the mass formula in Eq. (4.18) depends on the former.
  3. [Fig. 9] The curves in Fig. 9 are not labeled by the values of f. Adding a legend or labels would make the claimed f1,2≲0.1 no-effect boundary and f2≳0.3 enhancement directly visible.
  4. [Tables] There are repeated 'T able' typos in table captions, and the phrase 'shown in black' appears twice in one sentence in Sec. 7.
  5. [Table 7 and App. A] The No-PBH model P2 is reported as having ns=0.9752, while the text says it 'maintains consistency with CMB observables'. Please state explicitly which dataset(s) and confidence level justify this, given the combined Planck+SPT+ACT constraints cited in Ref. [95].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the power-spectrum predictions are genuine numerical outputs for stated parameters; the f2 and A2 tuning is explicitly flagged as input selection, and the self-citations are disclosed prior work that is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that spectator axions with f2 ≳ 0.1 M_Pl and an exponentially small prefactor A2 can enhance the curvature power-spectrum peak, enabling PBH formation. This is obtained by numerically integrating the Mukhanov–Sasaki system (Eqs. 5.7–5.8) with PyTransport for the parameter sets in Tables 4 and 6. No equation defines P_R^peak as an input, and no parameter is fitted to the target peak value: the reported P_R^peak = 3.5×10^-3 is an output of the perturbation evolution. The only normalization-type adjustment is V0 = 2.07×10^-9, which matches the CMB amplitude As; the peak height itself is not used as a fit target. The required tuning of A2 is explicitly acknowledged in Sec. 6: "requiring A2 ≪ 1 to keep the axion χ2 light enough" and "This tuning in A2 is a crucial condition to realize axion-assisted PBH formation." That is input selection, not circularity. The self-citations to Refs. [47,48,72,73,74–77] are prior works by overlapping authors, but the present numerical results are independently computed and do not reduce to those citations. The Sec. 7 caveat that globally consistent K3-fibred Calabi–Yau compactifications with N2 ~ O(10^3) are not yet constructed is a correctness/model-building risk, not a circularity. Hence no load-bearing circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central calculation adds the two C4 axions to the single-field Fibre Inflation potential. Its load-bearing inputs are the phenomenological V_inf parameters (C_i), the assumed leading-order non-perturbative axion potential, the spectator-condition ρ_ax≪ρ_inf, the two-field linear perturbation system, the simplified PBH threshold, and a hand-selected corner (f2≳0.1, A2~10^-6) whose string-theory realization the authors explicitly leave to future work. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • V0 (Success) = 2.07×10^-9 (Planck units)
    Rescaled from the P2 value 1.89×10^-9 to match the observed scalar amplitude A_s=2.10×10^-9 (Tab. 5).
  • Inflaton potential coefficients C2-C6 (P2/Success) = 0.5, 0.26614, 7.0×10^-4, 0.0391168, 0.0357523
    Flux-dependent tunable coefficients of Eq. (3.1), chosen so P2 has no PBH peak (1.87×10^-4) and Success produces PBHs while matching CMB observables; not derived from a concrete compactification in this paper.
  • Axion masses M1, M2 (Success) = 8×10^-7, 8×10^-7 (Planck units)
    Inputs in Tab. 4, equivalent via Eq. (4.18) to non-perturbative prefactors A1~2.7×10^-7 and A2~1.5×10^-7; chosen so m_ax ~ 0.1H during the USR phase.
  • Axion decay constants f1, f2 (Success) = 0.1 M_Pl, 0.5 M_Pl
    Inputs chosen; f2≳0.1 is the condition for χ2 to alter P_R, and f2=0.5 corresponds to N2~O(10^3) in Eq. (2.14).
  • Initial conditions φ_i, χ1_i, χ2_i = φ_i=8 M_Pl (P2/Success); χ_i=0.1πf1, 0.1πf2
    Chosen by hand; φ_i yields ~53 e-folds and χ_i<π keeps the ∂χ²V term negative-definite.
  • Non-perturbative prefactor A2 = ~10^-6 (Fig. 9 scan); ~1.5×10^-7 (Success)
    Exponentially small prefactor required for axion-assisted enhancement; expected O(1), with the paper proposing threshold corrections or field-dependent prefactors as possible origins (Sec. 7).
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The Fibre Inflation single-field potential has the form of Eq. (3.1) with flux-dependent tunable parameters C_2-C_6.
    Imported from Refs. [47,48]; the parameters are not derived from a concrete Calabi-Yau compactification in this paper, and P1/P2 values are chosen to create or avoid the USR plateau.
  • domain assumption The two light axions have potential V_ax = Λ1(1-cos χ1/f1)+Λ2(1-cos χ2/f2), with Λ_i given by Eqs. (2.16)-(2.18), generated by leading-order non-perturbative effects.
    Assumes gaugino condensation or string instantons at leading order; Sec. 7 acknowledges that non-rigid cycles may forbid this and that the potential could be suppressed to poly-instanton order.
  • domain assumption The heavy moduli τ3, θ3, σ decouple during inflation, leaving only φ, χ1, χ2 dynamical.
    Mass hierarchy m_τ3 ~ m_θ3 ~ m_3/2 ≫ H is standard in LVS-type compactifications and stated in Sec. 2.
  • domain assumption The spectator condition ρ_ax ≪ ρ_inf holds throughout inflation.
    Imposed at the start of Sec. 4; verified for the displayed parameters but restricts the explored region.
  • standard math The two-field perturbation system, Eqs. (5.7)-(5.8) with turn rate ω, governs the evolution of R and S.
    Follows Refs. [102-114]; standard for linearized multi-field inflation but does not capture quantum diffusion/non-Gaussian tails that are important for PBH abundance.
  • domain assumption PBHs form when P_R(k) > 10^-3, with mass given by Eq. (3.5) with γ=0.2 and g_*=106.75.
    Taken from the PBH literature; the actual PBH abundance is exponentially sensitive and not computed here.
  • ad hoc to paper Axion-assisted PBH production requires the tuned corner f2 ≳ 0.1-0.3 M_Pl, A2 ~ 10^-6, χ_i ~ 0.1πf.
    These values are selected by hand to make the mechanism work; the paper itself flags the A2 and N2~O(10^3) model-building challenge in Sec. 7.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 25830 in / 20825 out tokens · 204993 ms · 2026-08-01T08:47:38.565241+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the impact of light spectator axions on the seeding of primordial black holes (PBHs) during inflation in string theory. Primordial black holes exhibit unique and novel phenomenology, and may constitute the observed dark matter. Cosmic inflation provides a mechanism for producing them, but such inflation models typically feature Planckian field excursions, necessitating an ultraviolet completion into quantum gravity. String theory provides a natural framework for doing so, and indeed Fibre Inflation has been shown to produce PBHs while satisfying constraints from cosmic microwave background data. In this work we study the dynamics of axions during Fibre Inflation, and find a diverse and rich set of possibilities, including turns in field space and enhancement of primordial perturbations. We find that across most of parameter space, notably an axion with a far sub-Planckian decay constant $f\ll M_{\rm Pl}$, there is a negligible impact on the power spectrum of curvature perturbations, indicating an overall robustness of the model. On the other hand, an axion with a larger but still sub-Planckian decay constant, $f\gtrsim {\cal O}(0.1) M_{\rm Pl}$, and an exponentially small prefactor of its non-perturbative potential, can enhance the growth of perturbations, making it easier to achieve the amplification needed to seed PBHs, effectively realizing axion-assisted PBHs in string theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 104 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov,The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,Sov. Astron.10(1967) 602

    1967

  2. [2]

    Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon

    S. Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152(1971) 75

    1971

  3. [3]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168(1974) 399

    1974

  4. [4]

    Meszaros,The behaviour of point masses in an expanding cosmological substratum, Astron

    P. Meszaros,The behaviour of point masses in an expanding cosmological substratum, Astron. Astrophys.37(1974) 225

    1974

  5. [5]

    B. J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys. J.201(1975) 1

    1975

  6. [6]

    M. Y. Khlopov, B. A. Malomed, I. B. Zeldovich and Y. B. Zeldovich,Gravitational instability of scalar fields and formation of primordial black holes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.215(1985) 575. – 26 – 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10-10 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-2 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -1 0 1 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 14 Figure 12: Evolution of the background ...

    1985

  7. [7]

    J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik,Dynamics of primordial black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 124013 [astro-ph/9901292]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    M. Y. Khlopov,Primordial Black Holes,Res. Astron. Astrophys.10(2010) 495 [0801.0116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama,New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 104019 [0912.5297]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka and S. Yokoyama,Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 063001 [1801.05235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama,Constraints on primordial black holes, Rept. Prog. Phys.84(2021) 116902 [2002.12778]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel,Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 355 [2006.02838]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh,Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,J. Phys. G48(2021) 043001 [2007.10722]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Escriv` a,PBH Formation from Spherically Symmetric Hydrodynamical Perturbations: A Review,Universe8(2022) 66 [2111.12693]

    A. Escriv` a,PBH Formation from Spherically Symmetric Hydrodynamical Perturbations: A Review,Universe8(2022) 66 [2111.12693]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Villanueva-Domingo, O

    P. Villanueva-Domingo, O. Mena and S. Palomares-Ruiz,A brief review on primordial black holes as dark matter,Front. Astron. Space Sci.8(2021) 87 [2103.12087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Escriv` a, F

    A. Escriv` a, F. Kuhnel and Y. Tada,Primordial Black Holes,2211.05767. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Gorton and A

    M. Gorton and A. M. Green,How open is the asteroid-mass primordial black hole window?, SciPost Phys.17(2024) 032 [2403.03839]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Volonteri, M

    M. Volonteri, M. Habouzit and M. Colpi,The origins of massive black holes,Nature Rev. Phys.3(2021) 732 [2110.10175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Dayal,Exploring a primordial solution for early black holes detected with JWST,Astron

    P. Dayal,Exploring a primordial solution for early black holes detected with JWST,Astron. Astrophys.690(2024) A182 [2407.07162]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Huang, Hai-Long and Wang, Yu-Tong and Piao, Yun-Song,Supermassive primordial black holes for the GHZ9 and UHZ1 observed by the JWST,2410.05891

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Huang, J.-Q

    H.-L. Huang, J.-Q. Jiang, J. He, Y.-T. Wang and Y.-S. Piao,Sub-Eddington accreting supermassive primordial black holes explain Little Red Dots,2410.20663

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Huang, J.-Q

    H.-L. Huang, J.-Q. Jiang and Y.-S. Piao,High-redshift JWST massive galaxies and the initial clustering of supermassive primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 103540 [2407.15781]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz et al., Did LIGO detect dark matter?,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 201301 [1603.00464]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini and A. Riotto,NANOGrav Data Hints at Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 041303 [2009.08268]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    V. A. De Lorenci, D. I. Kaiser, P. Peter, L. S. Ruiz and N. E. Wolfe,Gravitational wave signals from primordial black holes orbiting solar-type stars,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 063063 [2504.07517]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    W. Qin, S. R. Geller, S. Balaji, E. McDonough and D. I. Kaiser,Planck constraints and gravitational wave forecasts for primordial black hole dark matter seeded by multifield inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 043508 [2303.02168]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    A. P. Klipfel and D. I. Kaiser,Ultrahigh-Energy Neutrinos from Primordial Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 121003 [2503.19227]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    M. J. Baker, J. Iguaz Juan, A. Symons and A. Thamm,Explaining the PeV Neutrino Fluxes at KM3NeT and IceCube with Quasi-Extremal Primordial Black Holes,2505.22722

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    A. P. Klipfel, P. Fisher and D. I. Kaiser,Hawking radiation signatures from primordial black holes transiting the inner Solar System: Prospects for detection,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 103007 [2506.14041]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    W. H. Kinney,Horizon crossing and inflation with large eta,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 023515 [gr-qc/0503017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  31. [31]

    Martin, H

    J. Martin, H. Motohashi and T. Suyama,Ultra Slow-Roll Inflation and the non-Gaussianity Consistency Relation,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 023514 [1211.0083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales,Primordial Black Hole production in Critical Higgs Inflation,Phys. Lett. B776(2018) 345 [1705.04861]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Garcia-Bellido and E

    J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales,Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation,Phys. Dark Univ.18(2017) 47 [1702.03901]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Germani and T

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec,On primordial black holes from an inflection point,Phys. Dark Univ.18(2017) 6 [1706.04226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Kannike, L

    K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal and H. Veerm¨ ae,Single Field Double Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,JCAP09(2017) 020 [1705.06225]. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Motohashi and W

    H. Motohashi and W. Hu,Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 063503 [1706.06784]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Di and Y

    H. Di and Y. Gong,Primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from ultra-slow-roll inflation,JCAP07(2018) 007 [1707.09578]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Ballesteros and M

    G. Ballesteros and M. Taoso,Primordial black hole dark matter from single field inflation, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023501 [1709.05565]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes,JCAP10(2017) 046 [1707.00537]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Passaglia, W

    S. Passaglia, W. Hu and H. Motohashi,Primordial black holes and local non-Gaussianity in canonical inflation,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 043536 [1812.08243]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Biagetti, G

    M. Biagetti, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion,JCAP07(2018) 032 [1804.07124]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    S. S. Mishra and V. Sahni,Primordial Black Holes from a tiny bump/dip in the Inflaton potential,JCAP04(2020) 007 [1911.00057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    D. G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 101302 [2012.06551]

    arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Karam, N

    A. Karam, N. Koivunen, E. Tomberg, V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ ae,Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes,JCAP03(2023) 013 [2205.13540]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato,Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,Universe9(2023) 203 [2301.03600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    P. S. Cole, A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes and S. P. Patil,Primordial black holes from single-field inflation: a fine-tuning audit,JCAP08(2023) 031 [2304.01997]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. A. Diaz and F. G. Pedro,Primordial Black Holes from String Inflation,JCAP 06(2018) 034 [1803.02837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. G. Pedro and N. Pedron,Secondary GWs and PBHs in string inflation: formation and detectability,JCAP08(2022) 030 [2203.00021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Zhou,Highly non-Gaussian tails and primordial black holes from single-field inflation,JCAP12(2022) 034 [2207.11910]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough and W. Hu,Primordial black holes arise when the inflaton falls,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123553 [2104.03972]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough and W. Hu,Amplification of primordial perturbations from the rise or fall of the inflaton,JCAP02(2022) 031 [2110.14641]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Bhaumik and R

    N. Bhaumik and R. K. Jain,Primordial black holes dark matter from inflection point models of inflation and the effects of reheating,JCAP01(2020) 037 [1907.04125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Pi and M

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Logarithmic Duality of the Curvature Perturbation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(2023) 011002 [2211.13932]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Choudhury, A

    S. Choudhury, A. Karde, S. Panda and M. Sami,Realisation of the ultra-slow roll phase in Galileon inflation and PBH overproduction,JCAP07(2024) 034 [2401.10925]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister,Inflation and String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on – 30 – Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2015, 10.1017/CBO9781316105733, [1404.2601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1 [2303.04819]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Cicoli, C

    M. Cicoli, C. P. Burgess and F. Quevedo,Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications,JCAP03(2009) 013 [0808.0691]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    B. J. Broy, D. Ciupke, F. G. Pedro and A. Westphal,Starobinsky-Type Inflation from α′-Corrections,JCAP01(2016) 001 [1509.00024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, S. de Alwis and F. Muia,α ′ Inflation: moduli stabilisation and observable tensors from higher derivatives,JHEP09(2016) 026 [1607.01395]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Muia and P. Shukla,Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,JHEP11 (2016) 182 [1611.04612]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, V. A. Diaz, V. Guidetti, F. Muia and P. Shukla,Chiral Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,JHEP11(2017) 207 [1709.01518]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    C. P. Burgess, M. Cicoli, S. de Alwis and F. Quevedo,Robust Inflation from Fibrous Strings,JCAP05(2016) 032 [1603.06789]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Cicoli and G

    M. Cicoli and G. A. Piovano,Reheating and Dark Radiation after Fibre Inflation,JCAP02 (2019) 048 [1809.01159]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Cicoli and E

    M. Cicoli and E. Di Valentino,Fitting string inflation to real cosmological data: The fiber inflation case,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 043521 [2004.01210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Cicoli, K

    M. Cicoli, K. Sinha and R. Wiley Deal,The dark universe after reheating in string inflation,JHEP12(2022) 068 [2208.01017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Grassi, O. Lacombe and F. G. Pedro,Chiral global embedding of Fibre Inflation with D3uplift,JHEP06(2025) 090 [2412.08723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530 [0905.4720]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell and A. Ringwald,The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology,JHEP10(2012) 146 [1206.0819]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [69]

    V. M. Mehta, M. Demirtas, C. Long, D. J. E. Marsh, L. McAllister and M. J. Stott, Superradiance in string theory,JCAP07(2021) 033 [2103.06812]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Halverson, C

    J. Halverson, C. Long, B. Nelson and G. Salinas,Towards string theory expectations for photon couplings to axionlike particles,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 106010 [1909.05257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    Freese, J

    K. Freese, J. A. Frieman and A. V. Olinto,Natural Inflation with Pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone Bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.65(1990) 3233

    1990

  72. [72]

    D. L. Lorenzoni, S. R. Geller, Z. Ireland, D. I. Kaiser, E. McDonough and K. A. Wittmeier, Light Scalar Fields Foster Production of Primordial Black Holes,2504.13251

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    D. L. Lorenzoni, S. R. Geller, D. I. Kaiser and E. McDonough,Primordial Black Holes from Inflation with a Spectator Field,2512.04199

    arXiv

  74. [74]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, F. G. Pedro and G. P. Vacca,A geometrical instability for ultra-light fields during inflation?,JCAP12(2018) 037 [1807.03818]. – 31 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti and F. G. Pedro,Geometrical Destabilisation of Ultra-Light Axions in String Inflation,JCAP05(2019) 046 [1903.01497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, F. Muia, F. G. Pedro and G. P. Vacca,A fake instability in string inflation,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 195012 [2107.12392]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Cicoli, V

    M. Cicoli, V. Guidetti, F. Muia, F. G. Pedro and G. P. Vacca,On the choice of entropy variables in multifield inflation,Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 025008 [2107.03391]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. G. Pedro and G. Tasinato,Natural Quintessence in String Theory,JCAP07 (2012) 044 [1203.6655]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  79. [79]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Cunillera, A. Padilla and F. G. Pedro,Quintessence and the Swampland: The Numerically Controlled Regime of Moduli Space,Fortsch. Phys.70(2022) 2200008 [2112.10783]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Cunillera, A. Padilla and F. G. Pedro,From inflation to quintessence: a history of the universe in string theory,JHEP10(2024) 141 [2407.03405]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.