Fermi gas of domain-wall Skyrmions in QCD in a strong magnetic field

Minoru Eto; Muneto Nitta; Patrick Copinger

REVIEW

Fermi gas of domain-wall Skyrmions in QCD in a strong magnetic field

Patrick Copinger, Minoru Eto, Muneto Nitta

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 27 Aug 2026 · 90 references

Pith's verdict: Builds on prior fermionic Skyrmion construction to compute baryon density with screening; technically solid but depends on the unverified half-period assumption from ref. [77].

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on September 9, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 5 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2608.26608 (version 1)

Pith ID5S6OKTLC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationMinoru Eto, Muneto Nitta, Patrick Copinger. "Fermi gas of domain-wall Skyrmions in QCD in a strong magnetic field." arXiv:2608.26608 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5S6OKTLC

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This paper computes the baryon density from fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions (DWSks) on the chiral soliton lattice, including screening from QED and chiral perturbation theory at finite temperature. The new results are the free Fermi gas density formula (4.5) and the self-consistent density with Debye masses (5.38). The derivations are mathematically careful within the stated approximations and the phase diagram plots are informative.

The main soft spot is the reliance on ref. [77] for the half-period effective theory that assigns fermionic statistics and baryon number one to each lump. The present paper adopts that construction without any internal check—no observable is computed from its own effective Lagrangian (3.13) that would confirm the spin statistics. If the lumps were actually bosonic or carried different baryon number, the Fermi gas treatment and thus the entire density prediction would be invalid. This is a load-bearing assumption and the paper does not mitigate it.

Other concerns are more minor: the ChPT Debye mass calculation uses the kink limit (κ→1) without a quantitative error estimate, and the self-consistent density equation involves Thomas-Fermi and derivative expansion approximations whose precision is not assessed. The free-parameter count looks fine; most are determined dynamically.

Despite these gaps, the paper is a natural extension of the authors' prior work and makes a plausible case. It deserves a serious referee who can ask for a discussion of the robustness of the fermionic assumption and error bars on the kink approximation. The overall framework is coherent and the results are potentially relevant for the QCD phase diagram and neutron star phenomenology.

I would bring this to a reading group only if the group has a specific interest in dense QCD in magnetic fields. I would not cite it in my own work until the fermionic statistics are independently corroborated. But the paper should not be desk-rejected; send it to peer review with these concerns noted.

Referee report

Significance

If the input from ref. [77] is correct, eq. (4.5) is a sharp, falsifiable prediction for baryon density in a region of the QCD phase diagram where lattice methods are not available, and the combination of Skyrmion, QED, and ChPT Debye masses into a single effective screening picture is a useful framework. The manuscript is transparent about its assumptions (kink limit, Thomas-Fermi approximation, dilute-gas regime), which is a real strength, and the one-loop ChPT Debye mass is obtained in closed form in eq. (5.27) with a consistency check in the B->0, high-T limit. The paper's analytic derivations are self-contained except for the central fermionic premise, and the headline density is a clean quantitative prediction that can be tested against future computations of the Skyrmion phase. The significance is nevertheless conditional: the Fermi-gas treatment, the density formula, and the fermionic screening all stand or fall with the half-period fermionic construction of ref. [77].

Major objections (5)

[§3.3, §4, Eq. (4.5)] The central result, the Fermi-gas baryon density eq. (4.5), rests entirely on the half-period effective theory of ref. [77] in which the minimal lump carries baryon number one and has fermionic statistics; the manuscript summarizes this construction in §3.3 but performs no independent check of it. If the lumps were bosonic, as in the full-period theory reviewed in the same section, the occupancy would not be a Fermi step function and eqs. (4.4), (4.5), (4.6), and (5.38) would not follow. Since the fermionic statistics derive from a nontrivial SU(3) embedding and a five-dimensional WZW spin-statistics argument in ref. [77], I ask the authors to either provide a self-contained demonstration within the present formalism (for example, computing the exchange phase or the induced Chern-Simons level of the half-period effective theory (3.13), or evaluating the spin of the minimal lump directly) or to state explicitly which results are imported from ref. [77] and what the domain of validity of that construction is.
[§5.2, Eqs. (5.20)-(5.28)] The ChPT Debye mass is computed only in the kink limit κ→1, where the Lamé operator (5.20) reduces to a Pöschl-Teller potential, and the manuscript states that this limit is 'representative' without quantifying the error at the κ values realized on the phase diagrams. This approximation matters because M_ChPT^2 feeds into M_tot^2 and hence into the finite-temperature isocurves through eq. (5.38) and Fig. 3, and the asserted dominance of the QED sector is not automatic: eqs. (5.11) and (5.28) have the same parametric form, and their ratio is exponentially sensitive to T and to sqrt(m_pi^2 + eB). Since the real Lamé spectrum is exactly known (ref. [88]), the authors should either evaluate eq. (5.25) at representative finite κ or provide a quantitative bound on the deviation from the κ→1 result.
[§5.1, Eqs. (5.9)-(5.11)] There is a sign inconsistency in the QED Debye mass: eqs. (5.9) and (5.10) carry an overall minus sign, and all Bessel-function terms inside the brackets are positive, so as printed M_QED^2 is negative, whereas eq. (5.11), described as the low-temperature limit of the same quantity, is written with a positive sign; the n=1, l=0 term of (5.10) taken in the stated asymptotic limit retains the minus sign. Because a negative M_QED^2 would make M_tot^2 in eq. (5.29) tachyonic and invalidate the Yukawa screening (5.31)-(5.33), the authors should correct the sign in (5.9)-(5.10) or justify why (5.11) has the opposite sign.
[§5.3, Eqs. (5.36)-(5.38), Fig. 3] The self-consistent density (5.38) rests on the Thomas-Fermi approximation G(x-x') ≈ -δ(x-x')/M_tot^2, which requires the inter-Skyrmion separation to be much larger than the Debye length, but the manuscript does not verify that this condition holds along the isocurves plotted in Fig. 3, including the T=m_pi case where the thermal masses are only moderately large; conversely, the boundary of the dilute-gas regime in §4 is stated in terms of a different density n_λ and should be checked against the same trajectories. In addition, the compensating charge density whose existence is assumed in §3.2 is not included in the screening calculation, and the numerical evaluation replaces sqrt(m_pi^2 + eB) inside M_ChPT^2 by an ad hoc nominal value (footnote of §5.3); the claimed insensitivity of the results to that replacement should be demonstrated quantitatively.
[§4, Eq. (4.4)] The two-dimensional density of states in eq. (4.4) is evaluated with an implicit degeneracy factor g=1, but for the claimed spin-1/2 fermionic DWSk the standard free Fermi-gas filling would give g=2 and double n_Sk in eq. (4.5). If the strong magnetic field is assumed to Zeeman-split and depopulate one spin projection, or if the half-period fermion is a single non-degenerate species, this should be stated explicitly, since it directly scales the headline density.

Minor objections (4)

[§5.3] The sentence 'the intra-Skyrmion separation is assumed to be much large than the total Debye length' should read 'much larger than'.
[References, ref. [88]] Reference [88] is garbled: 'W. A. and Haese-Hill, M. A. Hallnäs and A. P. a. Veselov' should presumably be A. W. Haese-Hill, M. A. Hallnäs and A. P. Veselov for the paper on the spectra of real and complex Lamé operators; please correct the citation.
[§5.2, Eq. (5.26)] In eq. (5.26), all bound-state and continuum contributions appear multiplied by the factor π/L, so they vanish in the thermodynamic limit L→∞ regardless of the reflectionless property; the statement that the discrete and continuum contributions cancel 'exactly' should either be justified for finite L or replaced by an explicit statement that eq. (5.27) is the L→∞ result.
[§4 and §6] The estimates supporting the assertion that the dilute-gas validity density n_λ lies in the ChPT-invalid (red) region are not shown; since this claim is used both in §4 and in the summary to justify the model, the underlying numerical comparison, including the chosen values of f_pi and m_pi, should be presented.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Domain-wall Skyrmions form a Fermi gas predicting baryon density in QCD under strong magnetic fields.

The reading

In QCD with a strong magnetic field, the ground state is a stack of domain walls known as the chiral soliton lattice (CSL). On each domain wall, Skyrmions (topological solitons) can appear, and a recent construction shows that these Skyrmions are fermions with baryon number one. This paper treats these fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions as a zero-temperature free Fermi gas on the two-dimensional CSL disk. The authors derive a formula for the three-dimensional baryon density that depends quadratically on the baryon chemical potential minus a critical mass determined by the magnetic field. The result matters because it gives a concrete, parameter-free prediction for baryon density in a region of the QCD phase diagram that is inaccessible to lattice simulations due to the sign problem.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the moduli effective theory constructed over a half-period of the chiral soliton lattice, which identifies lumps as single baryons with fermionic statistics. This effective theory yields a Kähler class $C(\kappa)$ that determines the Skyrmion mass. The Fermi gas treatment then follows from the dispersion relation $\varepsilon = \sqrt{m_{\rm Sk}^2 + p^2}$ for the two-dimensional momenta on the CSL plane.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the three-dimensional density of domain-wall Skyrmions (DWSks) is given by $n_{\rm Sk} = \frac{\mu_B^2 - (\pi C(\kappa))^2}{2\pi \ell}$, where $\mu_B$ is the baryon chemical potential, $C(\kappa)$ is the Kähler class of the moduli effective theory, and $\ell$ is the period of the chiral soliton lattice. This follows from treating the fermionic DWSks as a free Fermi gas on a disk, filling all states up to the Fermi momentum $k_F = \sqrt{\mu_B^2 - m_{\rm Sk}^2}$, where $m_{\rm Sk} = \pi C(\kappa)$ is the Skyrmion mass. The density thus increases quadratically with chemical potential above a threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of lumps as single baryons with fermionic statistics relies on the half-period effective theory of ref. [77], which is adopted without independent verification; if this construction fails, the Fermi gas treatment and the resulting density formula are invalid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The baryon density in the DWSk phase is determined solely by $\mu_B$ and the magnetic field through $C(\kappa)$ and $\ell$, providing a testable prediction for the QCD phase diagram.
At zero temperature, the DWSks themselves produce a Debye mass $M_{\rm Sk}^2 = e^2 \mu_B / (4\pi \ell)$, implying electromagnetic screening even at $T=0$.
At finite temperature, contributions from QED and ChPT add to the Debye mass, but they are exponentially suppressed at low $T$, so the free Fermi gas model remains accurate at low densities.
The Fermi gas model breaks down when the inter-Skyrmion distance becomes comparable to the Debye length, suggesting a crossover to a Fermi liquid or a Wigner crystal at higher densities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The predicted density formula could be used as an input for models of neutron star crusts in strong magnetic fields (magnetars), where DWSks might be relevant.
If the fermionic DWSks can pair into bosonic bound states, the system might undergo Bose-Einstein condensation, offering a new phase beyond the dilute Fermi gas.
The formalism extends naturally to rapidly rotating QCD matter, where a similar CSL appears, and the Fermi gas prediction could be compared with rotation-induced Skyrmion phases.

Original abstract

Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions arise in the chiral soliton lattice of two flavor chiral perturbation theory in a magnetic field as the ground state and are associated with baryons of the underlying theory of quantum chromodynamics. We analyze the electromagnetic screening characteristics of domain-wall Skyrmions that give insight into baryon density on the magnetic field and chemical potential phase diagram. At zero temperature, using the moduli effective theory, it is found Skyrmion density is saturated up to the Fermi momenta on the disk of the chiral soliton lattice orthogonal to the magnetic field. We further study chiral perturbation theory coupled to quantum electrodynamics leading to finite temperature screening, wherein a static fermionic domain-wall Skyrmion screening is predicted through a combined Debye mass/length.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,756 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.13 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions arise in the chiral soliton lattice of two flavor chiral perturbation theory in a magnetic field as the ground state and are associated with baryons of the underlying theory of quantum chromodynamics. We analyze the electromagnetic screening characteristics of domain-wall Skyrmions that give insight into baryon density on the magnetic field and chemical potential phase diagram. At zero temperature, using the moduli effective theory, it is found Skyrmion density is saturated up to the Fermi momenta on the disk of the chiral soliton lattice orthogonal to the magnetic field. We further study chiral perturbation theory coupled to quantum electrodynamics leading to finite temperature screening, wherein a static fermionic domain-wall Skyrmion screening is predicted through a combined Debye mass/length.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions arise in the chiral soliton lattice of two flavor chiral perturbation theory in a magnetic field as the ground state and are associated with baryons of the underlying theory of quantum chromodynamics.	background 0.96	0.15	0.19	asserted 1.00
s1	We analyze the electromagnetic screening characteristics of domain-wall Skyrmions that give insight into baryon density on the magnetic field and chemical potential phase diagram.	contribution 0.99	0.90	0.13	asserted 0.83
s2	At zero temperature, using the moduli effective theory, it is found Skyrmion density is saturated up to the Fermi momenta on the disk of the chiral soliton lattice orthogonal to the magnetic field.	result 1.00	0.93	0.28	asserted 1.00
s3	We further study chiral perturbation theory coupled to quantum electrodynamics leading to finite temperature screening, wherein a static fermionic domain-wall Skyrmion screening is predicted through a combined Debye mass/length.	contribution 0.50	0.83	0.20	asserted 0.73

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (90)

[77]

P. Copinger, M. Eto, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions of QCD in a magnetic field,JHEP05(2026) 063, [2512.22023]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[88]

W. A. and Haese-Hill, M. A. Halln¨ as and A. P. a. Veselov,On the spectra of real and complex lam´ e operators,Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications(2017)

View on Pith 2017
[1]

K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda,The phase diagram of dense QCD,Rept. Prog. Phys.74 (2011) 014001, [1005.4814]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[2]

C. Schmidt and S. Sharma,The phase structure of QCD,J. Phys. G44(2017) 104002, [1701.04707]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[3]

C. S. Fischer,QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.105(2019) 1–60, [1810.12938]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[4]

M. Gell-Mann and M. Levy,The axial vector current in beta decay,Nuovo Cim.16(1960) 705

View on Pith 1960
[5]

S. Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327–340. – 24 –

View on Pith 1979
[6]

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,Annals Phys.158 (1984) 142

View on Pith 1984
[7]

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral perturbation theory: Expansions in the mass of the strange quark,Nuclear Physics B250(1985) 465–516

View on Pith 1985
[8]

H. Leutwyler,On the foundations of chiral perturbation theory,Annals Phys.235(1994) 165–203, [hep-ph/9311274]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[9]

T. Brauner, H. Koleˇ sov´ a and N. Yamamoto,Chiral soliton lattice phase in warm QCD,Phys. Lett. B823(2021) 136767, [2108.10044]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[10]

J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95–97

View on Pith 1971
[11]

E. Witten,Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 433–444

View on Pith 1983
[12]

D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,Axial anomaly and magnetism of nuclear and quark matter, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 014021, [0710.1084]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008
[13]

M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Revisiting the Wess-Zumino-Witten Term in Nuclear and Quark Matter under Magnetic Fields and Rotation,2607.04929

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[14]

J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek,Fractional quantum numbers on solitons,Phys. Rev. Lett.47 (Oct, 1981) 986–989

View on Pith 1981
[15]

M. Eto, K. Hashimoto and T. Hatsuda,Ferromagnetic neutron stars: axial anomaly, dense neutron matter, and pionic wall,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 081701, [1209.4814]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[16]

T. Brauner and N. Yamamoto,Chiral Soliton Lattice and Charged Pion Condensation in Strong Magnetic Fields,JHEP04(2017) 132, [1609.05213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[17]

I. Dzyaloshinskii,Theory of helicoidal structures in antiferromagnets. i. nonmetals,Sov. Phys. JETP19(1964) 960–971

View on Pith 1964
[18]

T. Moriya,Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism,Phys. Rev. 120(1960) 91–98

View on Pith 1960
[19]

Y. Togawa, T. Koyama, K. Takayanagi, S. Mori, Y. Kousaka, J. Akimitsu et al.,Chiral magnetic soliton lattice on a chiral helimagnet,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 107202

View on Pith 2012
[20]

J. Kishine and A. Ovchinnikov,Chapter one - theory of monoaxial chiral helimagnet, vol. 66 ofSolid State Physics, pp. 1–130. Academic Press, 2015. DOI

View on Pith 2015
[21]

A. A. Tereshchenko, A. S. Ovchinnikov, I. Proskurin, E. V. Sinitsyn and J.-I. Kishine, Theory of magnetoelastic resonance in a monoaxial chiral helimagnet,Phys. Rev. B97(May,

View on Pith
[22]

J. Chovan, N. Papanicolaou and S. Komineas,Intermediate phase in the spiral antiferromagnetba 2cuge2o7,Phys. Rev. B65(Jan, 2002) 064433

View on Pith 2002
[23]

C. Ross, N. Sakai and M. Nitta,Exact ground states and domain walls in one dimensional chiral magnets,JHEP12(2021) 163, [2012.08800]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[24]

P. De Gennes,Calcul de la distorsion d’une structure cholesterique par un champ magnetique,Solid State Communications6(1968) 163–165

View on Pith 1968
[25]

T. Brauner and S. V. Kadam,Anomalous low-temperature thermodynamics of QCD in strong magnetic fields,JHEP11(2017) 103, [1706.04514]. – 25 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[26]

T. Brauner and S. Kadam,Anomalous electrodynamics of neutral pion matter in strong magnetic fields,JHEP03(2017) 015, [1701.06793]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[27]

T. Brauner and H. Koleˇ sov´ a,Chiral soliton lattice at next-to-leading order,JHEP07(2023) 163, [2302.06902]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[28]

X.-G. Huang, K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation,JHEP02(2018) 069, [1711.02190]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[29]

K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Topological term, QCD anomaly, and theη ′ chiral soliton lattice in rotating baryonic matter,JHEP07(2020) 196, [2003.13945]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[30]

H.-L. Chen, X.-G. Huang and J. Liao,QCD Phase Structure Under Rotation,Lect. Notes Phys.987(2021) 349–379, [2108.00586]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[31]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phases of rotating baryonic matter: non-Abelian chiral soliton lattices, antiferro-isospin chains, and ferri/ferromagnetic magnetization,JHEP08 (2022) 305, [2112.01381]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[32]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase in a rapidly rotating QCD matter,JHEP03(2024) 019, [2310.17511]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[33]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian chiral soliton lattice in rotating QCD matter: Nambu-Goldstone and excited modes,JHEP03(2024) 035, [2312.10927]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[34]

M. Kawaguchi, Y.-L. Ma and S. Matsuzaki,Chiral soliton lattice effect on baryonic matter from a skyrmion crystal model,Phys. Rev. C100(2019) 025207, [1810.12880]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[35]

S. Chen, K. Fukushima and Z. Qiu,Skyrmions in a magnetic field andπ0 domain wall formation in dense nuclear matter,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L011502, [2104.11482]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[36]

S. Chen, K. Fukushima and Z. Qiu,Magnetic enhancement of baryon confinement modeled via a deformed Skyrmion,Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 137992, [2303.04692]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[37]

Y. Amari, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Phase boundary of nuclear matter in magnetic field,JHEP 10(2025) 180, [2504.08379]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[38]

Z. Qiu and M. Nitta,Quasicrystals in QCD,JHEP05(2023) 170, [2304.05089]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[39]

M. Eto and M. Nitta,Quantum nucleation of topological solitons,JHEP09(2022) 077, [2207.00211]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[40]

T. Higaki, K. Kamada and K. Nishimura,Formation of a chiral soliton lattice,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) 096022, [2207.00212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[41]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Dislocations and crystallization dynamics of chiral soliton lattices,JHEP12(2025) 164, [2506.16354]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[42]

T. Brauner, G. Filios and H. Koleˇ sov´ a,Chiral soliton lattice in QCD-like theories,JHEP12 (2019) 029, [1905.11409]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[43]

M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Solitonic ground state in supersymmetric theory in background, JHEP10(2024) 178, [2404.12066]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[44]

M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Holographic QCD matter: chiral soliton lattices in strong magnetic field,JHEP02(2026) 240, [2507.16897]

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[45]

M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Chiral Soliton Lattices under Magnetic Fields and Rotation: a Holographic Analysis,2608.16579. – 26 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[46]

M. S. Grønli and T. Brauner,Competition of chiral soliton lattice and Abrikosov vortex lattice in QCD with isospin chemical potential,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 354, [2201.07065]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[47]

Z. Qiu and M. Nitta,Baryonic vortex phase and magnetic field generation in QCD with isospin and baryon chemical potentials,JHEP06(2024) 139, [2403.07433]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[48]

Y. Hamada, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Baryons as linked vortices in QCD matter with isospin asymmetry,JHEP02(2026) 200, [2509.20844]

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[49]

Y. Hamada, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,QCD phase diagram in a magnetic field with baryon and isospin chemical potentials,2602.11762

View on Pith arXiv
[50]

K. Mameda, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Baryonic vortices in rotating nuclear matter,2603.29325

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[51]

G. W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral anomaly induces superconducting baryon crystal,JHEP 09(2022) 192, [2206.01227]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[52]

G. W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral Soliton Lattice turns into 3D crystal,JHEP2024 (2024) 041, [2311.03880]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[53]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-Wall Skyrmion Phase in Dense QCD at Strong Magnetic Fields Using Leading-Order Chiral Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 181902, [2304.02940]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[54]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phase diagram of QCD matter with magnetic field: domain-wall Skyrmion chain in chiral soliton lattice,JHEP12(2023) 032, [2311.01112]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[55]

Y. Amari, M. Eto and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase of QCD in magnetic field: gauge field dynamics,JHEP05(2025) 037, [2409.08841]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[56]

M. Nitta,Josephson vortices and the Atiyah-Manton construction,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 125004, [1207.6958]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[57]

M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta,Sine-Gordon kinks on a domain wall ring,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 085003, [1302.0989]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[58]

M. Nitta,Correspondence between Skyrmions in 2+1 and 3+1 Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 025013, [1210.2233]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[59]

M. Nitta,Matryoshka Skyrmions,Nucl. Phys. B872(2013) 62–71, [1211.4916]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[60]

S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Incarnations of Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 085007, [1407.7210]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[61]

S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Domain wall Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 085022, [1403.1245]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[62]

M. Eto and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian Sine-Gordon Solitons: Correspondence betweenSU(N) Skyrmions andCP N−1 Lumps,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 085044, [1501.07038]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[63]

M. Nitta,Relations among topological solitons,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 105006, [2202.03929]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[64]

R. Cheng, M. Li, A. Sapkota, A. Rai, A. Pokhrel, T. Mewes et al.,Magnetic domain wall skyrmions,Phys. Rev. B99(May, 2019) 184412

View on Pith 2019
[65]

V. M. Kuchkin, B. Barton-Singer, F. N. Rybakov, S. Bl¨ ugel, B. J. Schroers and N. S. Kiselev,Magnetic skyrmions, chiral kinks and holomorphic functions,Phys. Rev. B102 (2020) 144422, [2007.06260]. – 27 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[66]

C. Ross and M. Nitta,Domain-wall skyrmions in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B107(2023) 024422, [2205.11417]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[67]

Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Chiral magnets from string theory,JHEP11(2023) 212, [2307.11113]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[68]

Y. Amari, C. Ross and M. Nitta,Domain-wall skyrmion chain and domain-wall bimerons in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B109(2024) 104426, [2311.05174]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[69]

Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Skyrmion crystal phase on a magnetic domain wall in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B111(2025) 134441, [2409.07943]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[70]

S. B. Gudnason, Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Creation of domain-wall Skyrmions in chiral magnets,Nucl. Phys. B1019(2025) 117106, [2406.19056]

View on Pith arXiv 2025
[71]

P. Leask,Manipulation and trapping of magnetic skyrmions with domain walls in chiral magnetic thin films,J. Phys. Condens. Matter37(2025) 135804, [2407.06959]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[72]

S. Lee, T. Fujimori, M. Nitta and S. K. Kim,Domain wall networks as skyrmion crystals in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 064422, [2407.04007]

View on Pith arXiv 2025
[73]

S. B. Gudnason, Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Creation of domain-wall skyrmions in chiral magnets with Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics and demagnetization,Phys. Rev. B113 (2026) 224425, [2512.21880]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[74]

T. Nagase et al.,Observation of domain wall bimerons in chiral magnets,Nature Commun. 12(2021) 3490, [2004.06976]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[75]

K. Yang, K. Nagase, Y. Hirayama, T. D. Mishima, M. B. Santos and H. Liu,Wigner solids of domain wall skyrmions,Nature Commun.12(2021) 6006, [2110.08069]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[76]

Y. Amari, M. Nitta and R. Yokokura,Spin statistics and surgeries of topological solitons in QCD matter in magnetic field,JHEP02(2025) 171, [2406.14419]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[78]

B. Wunsch, T. Stauber, F. Sols and F. Guinea,Dynamical polarization of graphene at finite doping,New Journal of Physics8(2006) 318–318

View on Pith 2006
[79]

E. Hwang and S. Das Sarma,Dielectric function, screening, and plasmons in two-dimensional graphene,Physical Review B-Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75(2007) 205418

View on Pith 2007
[80]

N. Manton,A remark on the scattering of bps monopoles,Physics Letters B110(1982) 54–56

View on Pith 1982
[81]

M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi and N. Sakai,Manifestly supersymmetric effective Lagrangians on BPS solitons,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 125008, [hep-th/0602289]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[82]

H. Gies,QED effective action at finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 105002, [hep-ph/9812436]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[83]

W. Dittrich and H. Gies,Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, vol. 166. 2000, 10.1007/3-540-45585-X

View on Pith doi:10.1007/3-540-45585-x
[84]

J. S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664–679

View on Pith 1951
[85]

G. V. Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics. Ian Kogan memorial collection (3 volume – 28 – set)(M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and J. Wheater, eds.), pp. 445–522. 2004.hep-th/0406216. DOI

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[86]

J. P. Edwards and C. Schubert,Quantum mechanical path integrals in the first quantised approach to quantum field theory, 12, 2019,1912.10004

View on Pith arXiv 2019
[87]

O. Corradini, C. Schubert, J. P. Edwards and N. Ahmadiniaz,Spinning Particles in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, 12, 2015,1512.08694

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[89]

W.-D. Li and W.-S. Dai,Heat-kernel approach for scattering,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 294, [1503.07380]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[90]

D. V. Vassilevich,Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,Phys. Rept.388(2003) 279–360, [hep-th/0306138]. – 29 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 65 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 4 papers

To extract the fermionic DWSk one must integrate over the half period of the CSL [ref] , i.e., over the interval $0<z<ℓ/2$ or $ℓ/2<z<ℓ$ for e.g. the first period in the sine-Gordon soliton, eq.

Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions of QCD in a magnetic field · Moduli effective theory · 0.81
[ref] , we can determine the relevant fluctuation operators for both the neutral, $𝔇^(π^0)$, and charged pions, $𝔇^(π^±)$, whose respective effective actions read [equation] c.f., eq.

Chiral Soliton Lattice and Charged Pion Condensation in Strong Magnetic Fields · ChPT Debye mass · 1.00
[ref] , where thermal corrections to the CSL were explored.

Chiral soliton lattice phase in warm QCD · ChPT Debye mass · 0.95

Uses data or values from 1 paper

For the Pöschl-Teller potential the total phase shift is given as $δ(k)=2arctan(2/k)+2arctan(1/k).$ [ref] .

Heat-kernel approach for scattering · ChPT Debye mass · 0.97

Cites as background 30 papers

Further studies include a relation between CSL and Skyrmions [ref] , an incommensurate crystal consisting of a mixed CSL of $η'$ and $π_0$ [ref] , the formation of CSLs through quantum tunneling [ref] and dynamical formation [ref] , CSLs in QCD-like theories [ref] , supersymmetric QCD [ref] , and holographic QCD [ref] , and coexistence or competition of charged pion vortices and CSL with finite isospin chemical potential [ref] (see also ref.

Quantum nucleation of topological solitons · Introduction · 0.98
Further studies include a relation between CSL and Skyrmions [ref] , an incommensurate crystal consisting of a mixed CSL of $η'$ and $π_0$ [ref] , the formation of CSLs through quantum tunneling [ref] and dynamical formation [ref] , CSLs in QCD-like theories [ref] , supersymmetric QCD [ref] , and holographic QCD [ref] , and coexistence or competition of charged pion vortices and CSL with finite isospin chemical potential [ref] (see also ref.

Chiral Soliton Lattices under Magnetic Fields and Rotation: a Holographic Analysis · Introduction · 0.98
Further studies include a relation between CSL and Skyrmions [ref] , an incommensurate crystal consisting of a mixed CSL of $η'$ and $π_0$ [ref] , the formation of CSLs through quantum tunneling [ref] and dynamical formation [ref] , CSLs in QCD-like theories [ref] , supersymmetric QCD [ref] , and holographic QCD [ref] , and coexistence or competition of charged pion vortices and CSL with finite isospin chemical potential [ref] (see also ref.

2602.11762 · Introduction · 0.98

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [77]

P. Copinger, M. Eto, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions of QCD in a magnetic field,JHEP05(2026) 063, [2512.22023]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[2] [88]

W. A. and Haese-Hill, M. A. Halln¨ as and A. P. a. Veselov,On the spectra of real and complex lam´ e operators,Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications(2017)

View on Pith 2017

[3] [1]

K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda,The phase diagram of dense QCD,Rept. Prog. Phys.74 (2011) 014001, [1005.4814]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[4] [2]

C. Schmidt and S. Sharma,The phase structure of QCD,J. Phys. G44(2017) 104002, [1701.04707]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[5] [3]

C. S. Fischer,QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.105(2019) 1–60, [1810.12938]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[6] [4]

M. Gell-Mann and M. Levy,The axial vector current in beta decay,Nuovo Cim.16(1960) 705

View on Pith 1960

[7] [5]

S. Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327–340. – 24 –

View on Pith 1979

[8] [6]

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,Annals Phys.158 (1984) 142

View on Pith 1984

[9] [7]

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral perturbation theory: Expansions in the mass of the strange quark,Nuclear Physics B250(1985) 465–516

View on Pith 1985

[10] [8]

H. Leutwyler,On the foundations of chiral perturbation theory,Annals Phys.235(1994) 165–203, [hep-ph/9311274]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[11] [9]

T. Brauner, H. Koleˇ sov´ a and N. Yamamoto,Chiral soliton lattice phase in warm QCD,Phys. Lett. B823(2021) 136767, [2108.10044]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[12] [10]

J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95–97

View on Pith 1971

[13] [11]

E. Witten,Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 433–444

View on Pith 1983

[14] [12]

D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,Axial anomaly and magnetism of nuclear and quark matter, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 014021, [0710.1084]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2008

[15] [13]

M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Revisiting the Wess-Zumino-Witten Term in Nuclear and Quark Matter under Magnetic Fields and Rotation,2607.04929

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[16] [14]

J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek,Fractional quantum numbers on solitons,Phys. Rev. Lett.47 (Oct, 1981) 986–989

View on Pith 1981

[17] [15]

M. Eto, K. Hashimoto and T. Hatsuda,Ferromagnetic neutron stars: axial anomaly, dense neutron matter, and pionic wall,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 081701, [1209.4814]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[18] [16]

T. Brauner and N. Yamamoto,Chiral Soliton Lattice and Charged Pion Condensation in Strong Magnetic Fields,JHEP04(2017) 132, [1609.05213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[19] [17]

I. Dzyaloshinskii,Theory of helicoidal structures in antiferromagnets. i. nonmetals,Sov. Phys. JETP19(1964) 960–971

View on Pith 1964

[20] [18]

T. Moriya,Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism,Phys. Rev. 120(1960) 91–98

View on Pith 1960

[21] [19]

Y. Togawa, T. Koyama, K. Takayanagi, S. Mori, Y. Kousaka, J. Akimitsu et al.,Chiral magnetic soliton lattice on a chiral helimagnet,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 107202

View on Pith 2012

[22] [20]

J. Kishine and A. Ovchinnikov,Chapter one - theory of monoaxial chiral helimagnet, vol. 66 ofSolid State Physics, pp. 1–130. Academic Press, 2015. DOI

View on Pith 2015

[23] [21]

A. A. Tereshchenko, A. S. Ovchinnikov, I. Proskurin, E. V. Sinitsyn and J.-I. Kishine, Theory of magnetoelastic resonance in a monoaxial chiral helimagnet,Phys. Rev. B97(May,

View on Pith

[24] [22]

J. Chovan, N. Papanicolaou and S. Komineas,Intermediate phase in the spiral antiferromagnetba 2cuge2o7,Phys. Rev. B65(Jan, 2002) 064433

View on Pith 2002

[25] [23]

C. Ross, N. Sakai and M. Nitta,Exact ground states and domain walls in one dimensional chiral magnets,JHEP12(2021) 163, [2012.08800]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[26] [24]

P. De Gennes,Calcul de la distorsion d’une structure cholesterique par un champ magnetique,Solid State Communications6(1968) 163–165

View on Pith 1968

[27] [25]

T. Brauner and S. V. Kadam,Anomalous low-temperature thermodynamics of QCD in strong magnetic fields,JHEP11(2017) 103, [1706.04514]. – 25 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[28] [26]

T. Brauner and S. Kadam,Anomalous electrodynamics of neutral pion matter in strong magnetic fields,JHEP03(2017) 015, [1701.06793]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[29] [27]

T. Brauner and H. Koleˇ sov´ a,Chiral soliton lattice at next-to-leading order,JHEP07(2023) 163, [2302.06902]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[30] [28]

X.-G. Huang, K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation,JHEP02(2018) 069, [1711.02190]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[31] [29]

K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Topological term, QCD anomaly, and theη ′ chiral soliton lattice in rotating baryonic matter,JHEP07(2020) 196, [2003.13945]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[32] [30]

H.-L. Chen, X.-G. Huang and J. Liao,QCD Phase Structure Under Rotation,Lect. Notes Phys.987(2021) 349–379, [2108.00586]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[33] [31]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phases of rotating baryonic matter: non-Abelian chiral soliton lattices, antiferro-isospin chains, and ferri/ferromagnetic magnetization,JHEP08 (2022) 305, [2112.01381]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[34] [32]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase in a rapidly rotating QCD matter,JHEP03(2024) 019, [2310.17511]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[35] [33]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian chiral soliton lattice in rotating QCD matter: Nambu-Goldstone and excited modes,JHEP03(2024) 035, [2312.10927]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[36] [34]

M. Kawaguchi, Y.-L. Ma and S. Matsuzaki,Chiral soliton lattice effect on baryonic matter from a skyrmion crystal model,Phys. Rev. C100(2019) 025207, [1810.12880]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[37] [35]

S. Chen, K. Fukushima and Z. Qiu,Skyrmions in a magnetic field andπ0 domain wall formation in dense nuclear matter,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L011502, [2104.11482]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[38] [36]

S. Chen, K. Fukushima and Z. Qiu,Magnetic enhancement of baryon confinement modeled via a deformed Skyrmion,Phys. Lett. B843(2023) 137992, [2303.04692]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[39] [37]

Y. Amari, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Phase boundary of nuclear matter in magnetic field,JHEP 10(2025) 180, [2504.08379]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[40] [38]

Z. Qiu and M. Nitta,Quasicrystals in QCD,JHEP05(2023) 170, [2304.05089]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[41] [39]

M. Eto and M. Nitta,Quantum nucleation of topological solitons,JHEP09(2022) 077, [2207.00211]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[42] [40]

T. Higaki, K. Kamada and K. Nishimura,Formation of a chiral soliton lattice,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) 096022, [2207.00212]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[43] [41]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Dislocations and crystallization dynamics of chiral soliton lattices,JHEP12(2025) 164, [2506.16354]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[44] [42]

T. Brauner, G. Filios and H. Koleˇ sov´ a,Chiral soliton lattice in QCD-like theories,JHEP12 (2019) 029, [1905.11409]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[45] [43]

M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Solitonic ground state in supersymmetric theory in background, JHEP10(2024) 178, [2404.12066]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[46] [44]

M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Holographic QCD matter: chiral soliton lattices in strong magnetic field,JHEP02(2026) 240, [2507.16897]

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[47] [45]

M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Chiral Soliton Lattices under Magnetic Fields and Rotation: a Holographic Analysis,2608.16579. – 26 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[48] [46]

M. S. Grønli and T. Brauner,Competition of chiral soliton lattice and Abrikosov vortex lattice in QCD with isospin chemical potential,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 354, [2201.07065]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[49] [47]

Z. Qiu and M. Nitta,Baryonic vortex phase and magnetic field generation in QCD with isospin and baryon chemical potentials,JHEP06(2024) 139, [2403.07433]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[50] [48]

Y. Hamada, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Baryons as linked vortices in QCD matter with isospin asymmetry,JHEP02(2026) 200, [2509.20844]

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[51] [49]

Y. Hamada, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,QCD phase diagram in a magnetic field with baryon and isospin chemical potentials,2602.11762

View on Pith arXiv

[52] [50]

K. Mameda, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Baryonic vortices in rotating nuclear matter,2603.29325

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[53] [51]

G. W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral anomaly induces superconducting baryon crystal,JHEP 09(2022) 192, [2206.01227]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[54] [52]

G. W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral Soliton Lattice turns into 3D crystal,JHEP2024 (2024) 041, [2311.03880]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[55] [53]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-Wall Skyrmion Phase in Dense QCD at Strong Magnetic Fields Using Leading-Order Chiral Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 181902, [2304.02940]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[56] [54]

M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phase diagram of QCD matter with magnetic field: domain-wall Skyrmion chain in chiral soliton lattice,JHEP12(2023) 032, [2311.01112]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[57] [55]

Y. Amari, M. Eto and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase of QCD in magnetic field: gauge field dynamics,JHEP05(2025) 037, [2409.08841]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[58] [56]

M. Nitta,Josephson vortices and the Atiyah-Manton construction,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 125004, [1207.6958]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[59] [57]

M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta,Sine-Gordon kinks on a domain wall ring,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 085003, [1302.0989]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[60] [58]

M. Nitta,Correspondence between Skyrmions in 2+1 and 3+1 Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 025013, [1210.2233]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[61] [59]

M. Nitta,Matryoshka Skyrmions,Nucl. Phys. B872(2013) 62–71, [1211.4916]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[62] [60]

S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Incarnations of Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 085007, [1407.7210]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[63] [61]

S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Domain wall Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 085022, [1403.1245]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[64] [62]

M. Eto and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian Sine-Gordon Solitons: Correspondence betweenSU(N) Skyrmions andCP N−1 Lumps,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 085044, [1501.07038]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[65] [63]

M. Nitta,Relations among topological solitons,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 105006, [2202.03929]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[66] [64]

R. Cheng, M. Li, A. Sapkota, A. Rai, A. Pokhrel, T. Mewes et al.,Magnetic domain wall skyrmions,Phys. Rev. B99(May, 2019) 184412

View on Pith 2019

[67] [65]

V. M. Kuchkin, B. Barton-Singer, F. N. Rybakov, S. Bl¨ ugel, B. J. Schroers and N. S. Kiselev,Magnetic skyrmions, chiral kinks and holomorphic functions,Phys. Rev. B102 (2020) 144422, [2007.06260]. – 27 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[68] [66]

C. Ross and M. Nitta,Domain-wall skyrmions in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B107(2023) 024422, [2205.11417]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[69] [67]

Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Chiral magnets from string theory,JHEP11(2023) 212, [2307.11113]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[70] [68]

Y. Amari, C. Ross and M. Nitta,Domain-wall skyrmion chain and domain-wall bimerons in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B109(2024) 104426, [2311.05174]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[71] [69]

Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Skyrmion crystal phase on a magnetic domain wall in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B111(2025) 134441, [2409.07943]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[72] [70]

S. B. Gudnason, Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Creation of domain-wall Skyrmions in chiral magnets,Nucl. Phys. B1019(2025) 117106, [2406.19056]

View on Pith arXiv 2025

[73] [71]

P. Leask,Manipulation and trapping of magnetic skyrmions with domain walls in chiral magnetic thin films,J. Phys. Condens. Matter37(2025) 135804, [2407.06959]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[74] [72]

S. Lee, T. Fujimori, M. Nitta and S. K. Kim,Domain wall networks as skyrmion crystals in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 064422, [2407.04007]

View on Pith arXiv 2025

[75] [73]

S. B. Gudnason, Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Creation of domain-wall skyrmions in chiral magnets with Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics and demagnetization,Phys. Rev. B113 (2026) 224425, [2512.21880]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[76] [74]

T. Nagase et al.,Observation of domain wall bimerons in chiral magnets,Nature Commun. 12(2021) 3490, [2004.06976]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[77] [75]

K. Yang, K. Nagase, Y. Hirayama, T. D. Mishima, M. B. Santos and H. Liu,Wigner solids of domain wall skyrmions,Nature Commun.12(2021) 6006, [2110.08069]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[78] [76]

Y. Amari, M. Nitta and R. Yokokura,Spin statistics and surgeries of topological solitons in QCD matter in magnetic field,JHEP02(2025) 171, [2406.14419]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[79] [78]

B. Wunsch, T. Stauber, F. Sols and F. Guinea,Dynamical polarization of graphene at finite doping,New Journal of Physics8(2006) 318–318

View on Pith 2006

[80] [79]

E. Hwang and S. Das Sarma,Dielectric function, screening, and plasmons in two-dimensional graphene,Physical Review B-Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75(2007) 205418

View on Pith 2007

[81] [80]

N. Manton,A remark on the scattering of bps monopoles,Physics Letters B110(1982) 54–56

View on Pith 1982

[82] [81]

M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi and N. Sakai,Manifestly supersymmetric effective Lagrangians on BPS solitons,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 125008, [hep-th/0602289]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[83] [82]

H. Gies,QED effective action at finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 105002, [hep-ph/9812436]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[84] [83]

W. Dittrich and H. Gies,Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, vol. 166. 2000, 10.1007/3-540-45585-X

View on Pith doi:10.1007/3-540-45585-x

[85] [84]

J. S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664–679

View on Pith 1951

[86] [85]

G. V. Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics. Ian Kogan memorial collection (3 volume – 28 – set)(M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and J. Wheater, eds.), pp. 445–522. 2004.hep-th/0406216. DOI

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[87] [86]

J. P. Edwards and C. Schubert,Quantum mechanical path integrals in the first quantised approach to quantum field theory, 12, 2019,1912.10004

View on Pith arXiv 2019

[88] [87]

O. Corradini, C. Schubert, J. P. Edwards and N. Ahmadiniaz,Spinning Particles in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, 12, 2015,1512.08694

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[89] [89]

W.-D. Li and W.-S. Dai,Heat-kernel approach for scattering,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 294, [1503.07380]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[90] [90]

D. V. Vassilevich,Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,Phys. Rept.388(2003) 279–360, [hep-th/0306138]. – 29 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003