Nonequilibrium framework for first-order phase transitions

Jie Liu; Ligong Bian

REVIEW

Nonequilibrium framework for first-order phase transitions

Jie Liu, Ligong Bian

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 12 Oct 2026 · 62 references

Pith's verdict: Systematic CTP derivation of two-field Langevin equations, but the dissipation coefficient scaling between Eqs. (3.12) and (3.13) does not hold up — needs fixing before the framework can be trusted quantitatively.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 14, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2610.16385 (version 1)

Pith IDHMYOWEYJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationJie Liu, Ligong Bian. "Nonequilibrium framework for first-order phase transitions." arXiv:2610.16385 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HMYOWEYJ

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The paper delivers what the single-field literature already has (Gleiser & Ramos 1994) and extends it in two ways that are genuinely new: to a φ⁶ model and to a coupled two-scalar system with explicit dissipation and noise cross-terms. The derivation is clear and the use of CTP formalism is standard but carefully executed at two-loop order. For anyone who wants to simulate bubble nucleation in a singlet-extended scalar sector, this is exactly the kind of first-principles starting point they need. Credit where it is due: the fluctuation-dissipation relations are derived rather than guessed, and the structure of the equations (4.31–4.32) with off-diagonal ηϕχ is not in the older work.

The main soft spot is one that the reader flagged and the stress-test sharpens. The dissipation coefficient η1 in Eq. (3.12) scales as λ⁴ T⁻¹ times a phase-space integral over n(1+n)/ω², but Eq. (3.13) claims η1 = (192π/T³) ∫ d³q n(1+n)/ω. The λ⁴ factor is gone, the power of temperature has changed, and the integrand has lost a factor of 1/ω. The paper says "Using Eq. (3.9) in Eq. (3.12), we obtain …" but that step is not justified in the text. The integral in Eq. (3.13) might come from a different evaluation (perhaps using the narrow-width limit and the explicit form of the propagator), but the reader has no way to confirm it. This is a load-bearing inconsistency: the dissipation term η1 φ² φ̇ controls the whole Langevin equation (3.14). If η1 is wrong, the quantitative predictions for bubble nucleation are unreliable.

The other limitations are clearly stated by the authors: quasiadiabaticity, Markovianity, narrow-width, and absence of gauge fields and fermions. These are honest scope conditions, but they do mean the framework is not yet ready for phenomenology. The claim in the abstract that it "lay[s] the foundation for reliable predictions" is over-optimistic given that the approximations are not validated for typical electroweak parameters and the dissipation coefficient has a concrete algebraic issue.

Who should read this: theorists working on nonequilibrium field theory for phase transitions, especially those building real-time simulation codes. The paper is a solid scaffold even if the numerical expressions need a second pass.

Would I accept peer review? Yes—the core derivation is important and systematic, and the problems are fixable. But I would ask the authors to re-derive η1 carefully, show every intermediate step from Eq. (3.12) to (3.13), and confirm the final scaling with a check like dimensional analysis or a numerical benchmark. Without that, the paper is a formal derivation with unverified numbers.

Bottom line: useful framework, but the dissipation coefficient needs a fix before the equations can be used for simulations.

Referee report

Major objections (3)

[§3, Eqs. (3.12) and (3.13)] The scaling of the dissipation coefficient η₁ changes drastically between these two equations without a justified intermediate step. Eq. (3.12) gives η₁ = (λ²/8) β ∫ d³q/(2π)³ n(1+n)/ω · 2Γ. Substituting the thermal width Γ from Eq. (3.9) (Γ ∝ λ²T²/ω) leads to η₁ ∝ λ⁴ T ∫ d³q n(1+n)/ω², which scales as λ⁴ T² at high T. Eq. (3.13) instead claims η₁ = (192π/T³) ∫ d³q n(1+n)/ω ≃ (96π/T) ln(T/m_T), which has no λ factor and shows a different temperature scaling (T⁰ ln T vs. λ⁴ T²). Since η₁ controls the dissipative term η₁ φ² φ̇ in the central Langevin equation (3.14), this algebraic inconsistency undermines the quantitative utility of the framework. The authors must provide a clear derivation from (3.12) to (3.13) and resolve the discrepancy.
[§4, Eqs. (4.37)-(4.39) and the two-field dissipation coefficients] A similar scaling ambiguity appears in the two-field case. From Eq. (4.37), γhh ≃ β ∫ d³q n(1+n)/(8ω² Γ_h). Using Γ_h from Eq. (4.38) (Γ_h ∝ T²/ω_h) gives γhh ∝ (1/T³) ∫ d³q n(1+n)/ω_h, which scales as 1/T² at high T. Eq. (4.39) claims γhh ≃ (32π T / (12λ_h²+λ_hs²)) ln(T/m_h,T), which scales as T¹ and has an inverse coupling factor. The temperature and coupling scalings are incompatible. Moreover, the single-field limit (λ_hs→0) of ηϕϕ/ϕ² from (4.35) should reproduce the single-field η₁, but the scalings in (4.39) suggest a different parametric dependence. The authors should check the power counting and provide consistent expressions.
[§3, quasiadiabatic approximation (around Eq. 3.4)] The central approximation that the background field varies slowly enough to truncate the expansion at first order (Eq. 3.4) may break down for rapidly evolving bubble walls, especially during the early stages of nucleation. While the authors list this as a limitation in Sec. 5, a quantitative estimate of the regime of validity (e.g., comparison of the time scale of field variation to the thermal relaxation time) would strengthen the paper. The authors acknowledge this: “The assumption is justified for systems near equilibrium, whereφ c is not expected to change considerably over time.”

Minor objections (5)

[§3, Eq. (3.7)] The dressed propagator contains a term 2βΓ n(1+n) sin[ω|t-t'|] whose origin is not explained. Clarify whether this term arises from a resummation or from a specific approximation for the spectral function.
[§3, Eq. (3.13)] The second approximate equality in (3.13) reads η₁ ≃ (96π/T) ln(T/m_T). From the first expression η₁ = (192π/T³) ∫ d³q n(1+n)/ω, the high- T limit of the integral is ∝ T² ln(T/m_T), giving η₁ ∝ (192π/T) ln(T/m_T). The factor 2 discrepancy should be resolved or clarified.
[§4, Eq. (4.34)] The expressions for the high-temperature masses and couplings contain many terms; it would be helpful to indicate which diagrams contribute to each term (e.g., by citing the relevant topology from Fig. 2). Also check the power of T in the T³ terms: T³ multiplied by 1/m seems to give dimensions of mass², which is consistent, but the signs and numerical factors should be verified against the one-loop standard results.
[Appendix D, Eq. (D.11)] The result for K(m) is given but the corresponding expression for the two-propagator kernel with different masses (Eq. D.13) includes a term proportional to ζ(3)/T², which seems to be a high-temperature expansion artifact. Provide a reference or a brief justification for keeping such a term.
[Throughout] Several equation numbers in the text refer to equations that are not present or are mislabeled (e.g., the reference to Eq. (3.15) after Eq. (3.13) might be intended for the noise correlation). Please ensure all cross-references are correct.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Real-time finite-temperature field theory yields Langevin equations for first-order phase transitions, deriving dissipation and noise from the Schwinger–Keldysh effective action.

The reading

The paper develops a real-time nonequilibrium framework for first-order phase transitions using the closed-time-path (CTP) formalism of finite-temperature field theory. For a single scalar field with a φ⁶ potential and for a system of two interacting scalar fields, it derives Langevin equations that govern the evolution of the background fields. The dissipative coefficients and stochastic noise terms emerge from the imaginary and real parts of the CTP effective action, without being inserted by hand. This provides a first-principles basis for simulating bubble nucleation in cosmological phase transitions, which is essential for predicting gravitational wave signals and the conditions for electroweak baryogenesis.

What carries the argument

The Schwinger–Keldysh closed-time-path (CTP) effective action, computed through two-loop diagrams and after transforming to the physical-response basis (φ_c, φ_Δ). The Hubbard–Stratonovich identity converts the imaginary part of the effective action into stochastic auxiliary fields. The quasiadiabatic approximation (expanding the background field around the current time) and the assumption of spatial uniformity transform the nonlocal retarded kernels into local dissipation coefficients. The dressed propagator with a finite thermal width (from self-energy resummation) provides the necessary irreversibility, without which the dissipation coefficients would vanish. In the Markovian limit, the noise becomes white and satisfies a fluctuation–dissipation relation connecting the noise correlation to the dissipation coefficient.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the nonlocal retarded kernels in the CTP effective action, after applying the quasiadiabatic expansion and a Markovian approximation, reduce to local dissipation terms proportional to the field velocity, while the imaginary part of the effective action produces Gaussian noise fields that satisfy a fluctuation–dissipation relation. The procedure yields explicit expressions for the dissipation coefficients and noise correlation functions in terms of the thermal propagators. For the two-field case, the equations acquire a dissipation matrix with off-diagonal elements that couple the two order parameters, and the noise sources become correlated. The framework is derived at two-loop order and includes the leading thermal corrections to masses and couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The background field must vary slowly enough in time that the expansion φ(x') = φ(x) + φ'(x)(t'-t) truncated at first order is accurate, which may fail for rapidly evolving bubble walls or during the initial stages of the phase transition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The derived Langevin equations provide a first-principles replacement for ad hoc friction and noise in simulations of bubble nucleation during first-order phase transitions.
The noise correlation functions are determined by the underlying quantum field theory, enabling a consistent treatment of thermal fluctuations that respects the fluctuation–dissipation theorem.
For the two-field model, the coupled dissipation and cross-correlated noise capture the non-trivial interplay between the Higgs and singlet fields during a phase transition, which cannot be obtained from equilibrium effective potential studies alone.
The formalism is extensible to include gauge fields and fermions, offering a route to realistic predictions for electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational wave spectra.
The nucleation rate obtained from stochastic real-time simulations using these equations can be compared with Euclidean bounce calculations, providing a check on the validity of the equilibrium approximation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the quasiadiabatic approximation fails for rapidly accelerating bubble walls, the Langevin equation would need nonlocal terms, potentially altering the nucleation rate and the predicted gravitational wave spectrum from bubble collisions.
The cross-dissipation coefficient η_ϕχ ∝ ϕχ implies that in a two-step phase transition, the motion of one field can dynamically heat the other, possibly affecting the order and timing of the transitions.
The framework could be applied to other first-order transitions in condensed matter or heavy-ion collisions, where the same CTP machinery would yield analogous stochastic equations.

Original abstract

The first-order phase transition is central to electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational wave generation, yet thermal equilibrium effective potential analyses cannot describe the real-time non-equilibrium dynamics of the phase transition process. We use the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism of real-time finite-temperature field theory to study these effects. For the $\phi^6$ model, we derive the effective action and the corresponding Langevin equation. We further extend the formalism to the two scalar fields case, obtaining the coupled Langevin equations. These results provide a theoretical framework for the bubble nucleation simulation of the non-equilibrium phase transition process, laying the foundation for reliable predictions of baryogenesis and gravitational wave signals.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-14: 1 request, 4,267 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The first-order phase transition is central to electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational wave generation, yet thermal equilibrium effective potential analyses cannot describe the real-time non-equilibrium dynamics of the phase transition process. We use the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism of real-time finite-temperature field theory to study these effects. For the $\phi^6$ model, we derive the effective action and the corresponding Langevin equation. We further extend the formalism to the two scalar fields case, obtaining the coupled Langevin equations. These results provide a theoretical framework for the bubble nucleation simulation of the non-equilibrium phase transition process, laying the foundation for reliable predictions of baryogenesis and gravitational wave signals.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The first-order phase transition is central to electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational wave generation, yet thermal equilibrium effective potential analyses cannot describe the real-time non-equilibrium dynamics of the phase transition process.	gap 0.64	0.06	0.07	asserted 1.00
s1	We use the Schwinger-Keldysh closed-time-path formalism of real-time finite-temperature field theory to study these effects.	method 0.95	0.93	0.03	asserted 0.98
s2	For the $\phi^6$ model, we derive the effective action and the corresponding Langevin equation.	result 0.61	0.96	0.05	asserted 1.00
s3	We further extend the formalism to the two scalar fields case, obtaining the coupled Langevin equations.	contribution 0.67	0.95	0.06	asserted 1.00
s4	These results provide a theoretical framework for the bubble nucleation simulation of the non-equilibrium phase transition process, laying the foundation for reliable predictions of baryogenesis and gravitational wave signals.	interpretation 0.97	0.71	0.89	asserted 0.93

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.73 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** The closed time-path contour. The effective action Γ[φ] is obtained from the Legendre transformation of the connected generating functional W[J], Γ[φ] = W[J] − Z c d 4xJ(x)φ(x) , (2.5) where φ(x) = δW[J] δJ(x) , (2.6) and the function W is W[J] = −ilnZ[J] . (2.7) The detailed derivation of the perturbative loop expansion for Γ[φ] is provided in Appendix A. We now consider the contributions from this expansion up to two-loop order, to order λ 2 and c6. Graphically we have Γ[φ] = S[φ] + + + + – 3 –

**Figure 2.** Connected Feynman topologies of the two-field model at the two-loop order. The external solid lines correspond to the background fields ϕ and χ, while the internal loop lines denote the thermal propagators for h and s. and similarly χc = χ+ + χ− 2 , χ∆ = χ+ − χ− . (4.16) After transforming the loop contributions to the physical-response basis [26, 47], the effective action can be organized in the generic form ΓCTP = Z d 4x ( ϕ∆(−□ − m2 h )ϕc + χ∆(−□ − m2 s )χc − λh 4

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.16385 by the authors.

References

Works cited (62)

[1]

V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov,On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B155(1985) 36

View on Pith 1985
[2]

N. Blinov, J. Kozaczuk, D.E. Morrissey and C. Tamarit,Electroweak Baryogenesis from Exotic Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 035012 [1504.05195]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[3]

A.D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32

View on Pith 1967
[4]

A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational Waves from First Order Cosmological Phase Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2026. – 28 –

View on Pith 1992
[5]

M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2837 [astro-ph/9310044]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[6]

P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135(2024) 104094 [2305.02357]. [7]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012)...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[9]

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2887 [hep-ph/9605288]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[10]

V. Vaskonen,Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves from a real scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 123515 [1611.02073]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[11]

S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, C.L. Wainwright and P. Winslow,Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 035018 [1407.5342]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[12]

J. Kozaczuk,Bubble Expansion and the Viability of Singlet-Driven Electroweak Baryogenesis, JHEP10(2015) 135 [1506.04741]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[13]

D.J.H. Chung, A.J. Long and L.-T. Wang,125 GeV Higgs boson and electroweak phase transition model classes,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 023509 [1209.1819]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[14]

J. Hirvonen, J. L¨ ofgren, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory,JHEP 07(2022) 135 [2112.08912]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[15]

D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T.V.I. Tenkanen and G. White,Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions,JHEP04(2021) 055 [2009.10080]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[16]

M. Laine and A. Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field Theory, vol. 925, Springer (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9, [1701.01554]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[17]

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B458(1996) 90 [hep-ph/9508379]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[18]

L. Niemi, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Singlet-assisted electroweak phase transition at two loops,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115035 [2103.07467]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[19]

E.A. Calzetta and B.-L.B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[20]

J.I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2 ed. (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[21]

J.S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 407

View on Pith 1961
[22]

L.V. Keldysh,Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes,Sov. Phys. JETP20(1965) 1018

View on Pith 1965
[23]

K.-c. Chou, Z.-b. Su, B.-l. Hao and L. Yu,Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Formalisms Made Unified,Phys. Rept.118(1985) 1. – 29 –

View on Pith 1985
[24]

N.P. Landsman and C.G. van Weert,Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density,Phys. Rept.145(1987) 141

View on Pith 1987
[25]

T. Lundberg and R. Pasechnik,Thermal Field Theory in real-time formalism: concepts and applications for particle decays,Eur. Phys. J. A57(2021) 71 [2007.01224]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[26]

M. Gleiser and R.O. Ramos,Microphysical approach to nonequilibrium dynamics of quantum fields,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2441 [hep-ph/9311278]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[27]

C. Grojean, G. Servant and J.D. Wells,First-order electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a low cutoff,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0407019]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[28]

Y. Zhu, J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Theoretical uncertainties in first-order electroweak phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015018 [2503.19566]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[29]

J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Gauge-invariant bubble nucleation and gravitational waves from first-order electroweak phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D114(2026) L031703 [2512.05565]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[30]

J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Towards Accurate Gravitational Wave Predictions: Gauge-Invariant Nucleation in the Electroweak Phase Transition,2601.05793

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[31]

L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Xia,Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended standard model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115016 [2405.01191]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[32]

M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura and T. Matsui,Gravitational waves as a probe of extended scalar sectors with the first order electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 115007 [1509.08394]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[33]

A. Alves, T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha and D. Vagie,Collider and Gravitational Wave Complementarity in Exploring the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model,JHEP04(2019) 052 [1812.09333]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[34]

K. Hashino, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, P. Ko and T. Matsui,Gravitational waves and Higgs boson couplings for exploring first order phase transition in the model with a singlet scalar field,Phys. Lett. B766(2017) 49 [1609.00297]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[35]

C.-W. Chiang, Y.-T. Li and E. Senaha,Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 154 [1808.01098]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[36]

S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP08(2007) 010 [0705.2425]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[37]

J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin and F. Riva,Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet,Nucl. Phys. B854(2012) 592 [1107.5441]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[38]

G. Kurup and M. Perelstein,Dynamics of Electroweak Phase Transition In Singlet-Scalar Extension of the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 015036 [1704.03381]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[39]

L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, T.V.I. Tenkanen and D.J. Weir,Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171802 [2005.11332]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[40]

L. Bian and X. Liu,Two-step strongly first-order electroweak phase transition modified FIMP dark matter, gravitational wave signals, and the neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 055003 [1811.03279]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[41]

J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger,Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 055025 [1306.4710]. – 30 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[42]

J.M. Cline and K. Kainulainen,Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter from a singlet Higgs,JCAP01(2013) 012 [1210.4196]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[43]

M. Morikawa,Classical Fluctuations in Dissipative Quantum Systems,Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 3607

View on Pith 1986
[44]

S. Jeon,Computing spectral densities in finite temperature field theory,Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 4586 [hep-ph/9210227]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[45]

R.R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4695 [hep-ph/9204216]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992
[46]

A. Hosoya and M.-a. Sakagami,Time Development of Higgs Field at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 2228

View on Pith 1984
[47]

M. Le Bellac,Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[48]

T. Prokopec, M.G. Schmidt and S. Weinstock,Transport equations for chiral fermions to order h bar and electroweak baryogenesis. Part 1,Annals Phys.314(2004) 208 [hep-ph/0312110]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[49]

T. Prokopec, M.G. Schmidt and S. Weinstock,Transport equations for chiral fermions to order h-bar and electroweak baryogenesis. Part II,Annals Phys.314(2004) 267 [hep-ph/0406140]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[50]

K. Kainulainen,CP-violating transport theory for electroweak baryogenesis with thermal corrections,JCAP11(2021) 042 [2108.08336]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[51]

S.A. Ramsey, B.L. Hu and A.M. Stylianopoulos,Nonequilibrium inflaton dynamics and reheating. II. Fermion production, noise, and stochasticity,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 6003 [hep-ph/9709267]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[52]

M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Numerical approach to the onset of the electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 4544 [hep-ph/9707502]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[53]

A. Berera, J. Mabillard, B.W. Mintz and R.O. Ramos,Formulating the Kramers problem in field theory,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 076005 [1906.08684]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[54]

M. Carosi and B. Garbrecht,False vacuum decay beyond the quadratic approximation: Summation of nonlocal self-energies,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 085002 [2411.18421]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[55]

L. Batini, A. Chatrchyan and J. Berges,Real-time dynamics of false vacuum decay,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023502 [2310.04206]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[56]

Y. Bergner and L.M.A. Bettencourt,The Selfconsistent bounce: An Improved nucleation rate,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 045012 [hep-ph/0308107]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[57]

A. Riotto,The More relaxed supersymmetric electroweak baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 095009 [hep-ph/9803357]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[58]

J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis,Effective Action for Composite Operators,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2428

View on Pith 1974
[59]

J. Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf. Proc.739(2004) 3 [hep-ph/0409233]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[60]

W.-Y. Ai, M. Carosi, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit and M. Vanvlasselaer,Bubble wall dynamics from nonequilibrium quantum field theory,JHEP08(2025) 077 [2504.13725]. – 31 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[61]

A. Banik and K. Kainulainen,Consistent Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions with 2PI Methods,2608.04102

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[62]

K. Kainulainen, S. Nurmi and O. V¨ ais¨ anen,Tachyonic production of dark relics: classical lattice vs. quantum 2PI in Hartree truncation,JHEP10(2024) 009 [2406.17468]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[63]

M. Becker, E. Copello, J. Harz and C. Tamarit,Dark matter freeze-in from non-equilibrium QFT: towards a consistent treatment of thermal effects,JCAP03(2025) 071 [2312.17246]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[64]

R. Jackiw,Functional evaluation of the effective potential,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1686. – 32 –

View on Pith 1974

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov,On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B155(1985) 36

View on Pith 1985

[2] [2]

N. Blinov, J. Kozaczuk, D.E. Morrissey and C. Tamarit,Electroweak Baryogenesis from Exotic Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 035012 [1504.05195]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[3] [3]

A.D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32

View on Pith 1967

[4] [4]

A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational Waves from First Order Cosmological Phase Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2026. – 28 –

View on Pith 1992

[5] [5]

M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2837 [astro-ph/9310044]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[6] [6]

P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135(2024) 104094 [2305.02357]. [7]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012)...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[7] [9]

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atm H ≳m W ?,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2887 [hep-ph/9605288]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[8] [10]

V. Vaskonen,Electroweak baryogenesis and gravitational waves from a real scalar singlet, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 123515 [1611.02073]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[9] [11]

S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, C.L. Wainwright and P. Winslow,Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 035018 [1407.5342]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[10] [12]

J. Kozaczuk,Bubble Expansion and the Viability of Singlet-Driven Electroweak Baryogenesis, JHEP10(2015) 135 [1506.04741]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[11] [13]

D.J.H. Chung, A.J. Long and L.-T. Wang,125 GeV Higgs boson and electroweak phase transition model classes,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 023509 [1209.1819]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[12] [14]

J. Hirvonen, J. L¨ ofgren, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory,JHEP 07(2022) 135 [2112.08912]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[13] [15]

D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T.V.I. Tenkanen and G. White,Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions,JHEP04(2021) 055 [2009.10080]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[14] [16]

M. Laine and A. Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field Theory, vol. 925, Springer (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9, [1701.01554]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[15] [17]

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B458(1996) 90 [hep-ph/9508379]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[16] [18]

L. Niemi, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Singlet-assisted electroweak phase transition at two loops,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115035 [2103.07467]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[17] [19]

E.A. Calzetta and B.-L.B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[18] [20]

J.I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2 ed. (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[19] [21]

J.S. Schwinger,Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 407

View on Pith 1961

[20] [22]

L.V. Keldysh,Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes,Sov. Phys. JETP20(1965) 1018

View on Pith 1965

[21] [23]

K.-c. Chou, Z.-b. Su, B.-l. Hao and L. Yu,Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Formalisms Made Unified,Phys. Rept.118(1985) 1. – 29 –

View on Pith 1985

[22] [24]

N.P. Landsman and C.G. van Weert,Real and Imaginary Time Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density,Phys. Rept.145(1987) 141

View on Pith 1987

[23] [25]

T. Lundberg and R. Pasechnik,Thermal Field Theory in real-time formalism: concepts and applications for particle decays,Eur. Phys. J. A57(2021) 71 [2007.01224]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[24] [26]

M. Gleiser and R.O. Ramos,Microphysical approach to nonequilibrium dynamics of quantum fields,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2441 [hep-ph/9311278]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[25] [27]

C. Grojean, G. Servant and J.D. Wells,First-order electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a low cutoff,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0407019]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[26] [28]

Y. Zhu, J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Theoretical uncertainties in first-order electroweak phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015018 [2503.19566]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[27] [29]

J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Gauge-invariant bubble nucleation and gravitational waves from first-order electroweak phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D114(2026) L031703 [2512.05565]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[28] [30]

J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian,Towards Accurate Gravitational Wave Predictions: Gauge-Invariant Nucleation in the Electroweak Phase Transition,2601.05793

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[29] [31]

L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Xia,Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended standard model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115016 [2405.01191]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[30] [32]

M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura and T. Matsui,Gravitational waves as a probe of extended scalar sectors with the first order electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 115007 [1509.08394]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[31] [33]

A. Alves, T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha and D. Vagie,Collider and Gravitational Wave Complementarity in Exploring the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model,JHEP04(2019) 052 [1812.09333]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[32] [34]

K. Hashino, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, P. Ko and T. Matsui,Gravitational waves and Higgs boson couplings for exploring first order phase transition in the model with a singlet scalar field,Phys. Lett. B766(2017) 49 [1609.00297]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[33] [35]

C.-W. Chiang, Y.-T. Li and E. Senaha,Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 154 [1808.01098]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[34] [36]

S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy,Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition,JHEP08(2007) 010 [0705.2425]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[35] [37]

J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin and F. Riva,Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet,Nucl. Phys. B854(2012) 592 [1107.5441]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[36] [38]

G. Kurup and M. Perelstein,Dynamics of Electroweak Phase Transition In Singlet-Scalar Extension of the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 015036 [1704.03381]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[37] [39]

L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, T.V.I. Tenkanen and D.J. Weir,Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171802 [2005.11332]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[38] [40]

L. Bian and X. Liu,Two-step strongly first-order electroweak phase transition modified FIMP dark matter, gravitational wave signals, and the neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 055003 [1811.03279]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[39] [41]

J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger,Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 055025 [1306.4710]. – 30 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[40] [42]

J.M. Cline and K. Kainulainen,Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter from a singlet Higgs,JCAP01(2013) 012 [1210.4196]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[41] [43]

M. Morikawa,Classical Fluctuations in Dissipative Quantum Systems,Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 3607

View on Pith 1986

[42] [44]

S. Jeon,Computing spectral densities in finite temperature field theory,Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 4586 [hep-ph/9210227]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[43] [45]

R.R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4695 [hep-ph/9204216]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992

[44] [46]

A. Hosoya and M.-a. Sakagami,Time Development of Higgs Field at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 2228

View on Pith 1984

[45] [47]

M. Le Bellac,Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[46] [48]

T. Prokopec, M.G. Schmidt and S. Weinstock,Transport equations for chiral fermions to order h bar and electroweak baryogenesis. Part 1,Annals Phys.314(2004) 208 [hep-ph/0312110]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[47] [49]

T. Prokopec, M.G. Schmidt and S. Weinstock,Transport equations for chiral fermions to order h-bar and electroweak baryogenesis. Part II,Annals Phys.314(2004) 267 [hep-ph/0406140]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[48] [50]

K. Kainulainen,CP-violating transport theory for electroweak baryogenesis with thermal corrections,JCAP11(2021) 042 [2108.08336]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[49] [51]

S.A. Ramsey, B.L. Hu and A.M. Stylianopoulos,Nonequilibrium inflaton dynamics and reheating. II. Fermion production, noise, and stochasticity,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 6003 [hep-ph/9709267]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[50] [52]

M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Numerical approach to the onset of the electroweak phase transition,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 4544 [hep-ph/9707502]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[51] [53]

A. Berera, J. Mabillard, B.W. Mintz and R.O. Ramos,Formulating the Kramers problem in field theory,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 076005 [1906.08684]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[52] [54]

M. Carosi and B. Garbrecht,False vacuum decay beyond the quadratic approximation: Summation of nonlocal self-energies,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 085002 [2411.18421]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[53] [55]

L. Batini, A. Chatrchyan and J. Berges,Real-time dynamics of false vacuum decay,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023502 [2310.04206]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[54] [56]

Y. Bergner and L.M.A. Bettencourt,The Selfconsistent bounce: An Improved nucleation rate,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 045012 [hep-ph/0308107]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[55] [57]

A. Riotto,The More relaxed supersymmetric electroweak baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 095009 [hep-ph/9803357]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[56] [58]

J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis,Effective Action for Composite Operators,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2428

View on Pith 1974

[57] [59]

J. Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf. Proc.739(2004) 3 [hep-ph/0409233]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[58] [60]

W.-Y. Ai, M. Carosi, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit and M. Vanvlasselaer,Bubble wall dynamics from nonequilibrium quantum field theory,JHEP08(2025) 077 [2504.13725]. – 31 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[59] [61]

A. Banik and K. Kainulainen,Consistent Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions with 2PI Methods,2608.04102

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[60] [62]

K. Kainulainen, S. Nurmi and O. V¨ ais¨ anen,Tachyonic production of dark relics: classical lattice vs. quantum 2PI in Hartree truncation,JHEP10(2024) 009 [2406.17468]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[61] [63]

M. Becker, E. Copello, J. Harz and C. Tamarit,Dark matter freeze-in from non-equilibrium QFT: towards a consistent treatment of thermal effects,JCAP03(2025) 071 [2312.17246]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[62] [64]

R. Jackiw,Functional evaluation of the effective potential,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1686. – 32 –

View on Pith 1974