A Barnett-Like Effect in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

Dai-Neng Liu; Jan Steinheimer; Jin-hui Chen; Kai-Jia Sun; Marcus Bleicher; Yu-Gang Ma

REVIEW

A Barnett-Like Effect in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

Dai-Neng Liu, Kai-Jia Sun, Jan Steinheimer, Jin-Hui Chen, Yu-Gang Ma, Marcus Bleicher

Nuclear Theory · Submitted 26 Oct 2026 · 51 references

Pith's verdict: A useful, publishable correlation between Lambda polarization and source tilt, with a plausible mechanism, but the causal reading is not yet separated from shared energy ordering.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 27, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2610.35310 (version 1)

Pith IDAXFYOTX7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationDai-Neng Liu, Jan Steinheimer, Jin-hui Chen, Kai-Jia Sun, Marcus Bleicher, Yu-Gang Ma. "A Barnett-Like Effect in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions." arXiv:2610.35310 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AXFYOTX7

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Short version: the paper finds a clean near-linear relation between global Lambda polarization and the femtoscopic source tilt across sqrt(s_NN) = 2.24-7.7 GeV, and offers a plausible mechanism for it. I think the relation is real and worth publishing, but the causal reading is not fully established; the missing test is varying tilt at roughly fixed vorticity.

What's new: nobody has put P_Lambda and theta_s on one plot and noted the linear scaling. The mechanism is attractive: thermal vorticity has a quadrupole pattern, the contributions cancel, and a tilted emission ellipsoid breaks the cancellation, leaving P ~ |omega_zx| theta_s. UrQMD results line up with E895, HADES and STAR data, and the STAR points at 14.5 and 27 GeV extend the trend. The authors are upfront about the obvious weaknesses: the fit neglects theta_s uncertainties (b64), the analytic estimate uses representative parameters (b165), and the toy model neglects vorticity variations and realistic emission weights (b166).

Soft spots, in order. First, the shared-energy confound is real and not addressed. Both P_Lambda and theta_s fall monotonically with collision energy, and in UrQMD both come from the same events. Independent experiments remove the same-code objection, but the experimental points are also energy-ordered and sparse; the 3 GeV point even uses an interpolated tilt angle. Second, Eq. (11) illustrates the slope, it does not derive it. The parameters are chosen to match the observed 0.072 coefficient, so the proportionality constant has no predictive power. Third, the centrality mismatch (20-50% for P, 10-30% for theta) is acknowledged as minor (b52) but not tested. None of this sinks the correlation. The quadrupole-cancellation argument is physically sensible and the empirical relation is a useful compact summary. What is not established is the title's causal claim: that tilt actively modulates polarization. For that you need a controlled variation at the same beam energy, or a parameter-free derivation.

Who it's for: people working on spin polarization, vorticity, or femtoscopy at BES energies. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review and ask for either a fixed-energy test or softened causal language, plus a proper uncertainty treatment of the fit. I could not check the UrQMD/CRAB numerics because the code is not shipped; the model's track record makes that a minor concern.

Referee report

Significance

The reported correlation is potentially significant: it connects two independent observables, spin polarization and emission geometry, and makes a concrete, falsifiable prediction that future BES measurements can test. The work is technically sound in its components: the UrQMD polarization calculation follows the standard thermal-vorticity approach, the HBT tilt extraction builds on the established formalism of Refs. [30-33], the comparison covers three independent experiments, and Fig. 4a directly visualizes the quadrupolar vorticity pattern. The authors also explicitly disclose the main limitations: the fit neglects theta_s uncertainties (b64), Eq. (11) is an illustrative small-angle estimate with representative parameters (b165-b166), and the two observables are evaluated at different centralities (b52). The unresolved question is whether the linear locus reflects a causal geometric modulation of the polarization or a common energy ordering of two monotone quantities; the controls requested below are needed before the causal reading can be regarded as established.

Major objections (4)

[Fig. 3 / Eq. (5); Fig. 2] The shared-energy confound identified during review is real and is not fully removed by the experimental comparison. P_Lambda (Fig. 2a) and theta_s (Fig. 2b) are both outputs of the same UrQMD events and both decrease monotonically with sqrt(s_NN); a plot of one monotone function of an ordering variable against another tends to appear monotone and can be approximately linear without any coupling between the two observables. The data points from E895, HADES, and STAR mitigate the same-code objection, but every data point also varies in energy, so the linearity in Fig. 3 is equally consistent with a common energy ordering. Since in Eq. (6) the polarization of each Lambda is fixed by the local vorticity at its own emission point, with theta_s entering only through the correlation between emission positions and the quadrupolar vorticity pattern, the correlation alone does not identify the tilt as the causal agent. The missing control is a variation of theta_s at fixed vorticity: for example, a centrality scan at a single beam energy, or a modified UrQMD analysis in which the emission geometry is artificially rotated or re-weighted relative to a fixed vorticity field. If P_Lambda tracks theta_s under such a controlled variation, the causal claim in b68 would be established; without it, Eq. (5) should be presented as an empirical correlation and the causal framing should be softened.
[Methods: Relation between P_Lambda and theta_s (Eq. (11))] Equation (11) does not provide independent quantitative support for the slope, because E/m about 1.7, R_a/R_b about 2.2, and |omega_zx| about 0.07 are chosen so that the estimate (0.066 theta_s) reproduces the fitted slope in Eq. (5). The authors acknowledge that Eq. (11) is an illustrative small-angle estimate that neglects vorticity variations, realistic emission weights, and momentum dependence (b166), and that it assumes a uniform |omega_zx| magnitude in each quadrant (b160); those acknowledgements are on the record, so I do not treat them as defects in themselves. What remains unresolved is whether the mechanism survives in the actual UrQMD fields, which Fig. 4a shows to be strongly non-uniform. A direct test is available: compute the source-weighted, sign-alternating average of omega_zx over the freeze-out hypersurface, namely the S1 - S2 area weighting of the toy with the actual vorticity map and actual emission weights, and compare the resulting residue with the simulated P_Lambda. This would distinguish the geometric-breakage mechanism from a mere fit to the correlation. The authors acknowledge this: “Equation (11) provides an intuitive small- angle estimate, which neglects spatial and tem- poral variations of the vorticity, realistic emission weights, and the full momentum dependence of the rest-frame polarization.”
[Fig. 2 caption / b52] The two quantities entering the correlation are computed at different centralities: 20-50% for P_Lambda and 10-30% for theta_s (Fig. 2 caption). The claim in b52 that these differences have only a minor effect on the polarization-tilt correlation and do not alter the conclusion is stated without supporting analysis. Since the paper's quantitative claim is a specific slope (Eq. (5)), the centrality insensitivity should be demonstrated explicitly, for example by recomputing P_Lambda at 10-30% centrality or theta_s at 20-50% centrality and showing that the matched-centrality relation reproduces the same scaling.
[Main text, b68 / Fig. 2] The mechanism statement P_Lambda proportional to |omega_zx| theta_s in b68 has an energy-dependent coefficient: |omega_zx| is expected to change across sqrt(s_NN) = 2.24-7.7 GeV, and Fig. 2 shows that P_Lambda decreases more steeply than theta_s over this range. A single constant slope in Eq. (5) is then only consistent if |omega_zx| is approximately energy-independent or if the spread of the UrQMD band conceals the variation. The paper does not report the energy dependence of |omega_zx| or of the ratio P_Lambda/theta_s in the UrQMD results. Showing these would establish that the linearity is a property of the calculation and not an artefact of the band width.

Minor objections (5)

[Eq. (5) / Fig. 3] The fit in Eq. (5) neglects uncertainties in theta_s, as the authors note (b64); given the small number of experimental points and the sizable tilt uncertainties, the quoted slope uncertainty of ±0.010 should be verified with a fit that propagates uncertainties in both variables.
[Fig. 3 caption] The 3 GeV E895-STAR point uses an interpolated tilt angle; although this is disclosed in the text and caption, the point should be visually distinguished, for example by an open symbol, because its error bars do not include the interpolation systematic.
[References] Reference [37] has a corrupted author field ('al., B.E.A.e.') and a placeholder DOI, and reference [41], which supplies the equation of state used for the temperature and velocity fields, is an arXiv preprint; both should be corrected or flagged in the reference list.
[Fig. 2 caption] The sentence in the Fig. 2 caption describing the transverse-momentum intervals used for the tilt extraction lacks a main verb ('... the theoretical tilt angle evaluated at ...') and should be rewritten.
[Fig. 4 caption / main text] The caption of Fig. 4 does not state the sign convention of the color scale, so the reader cannot directly connect panel (a) with the quadrant-by-quadrant sign statement in the text; a sentence describing the color scale would clarify the comparison.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The global Λ spin polarization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions scales almost linearly with the tilt angle of the emitting source, revealing a geometry-modulated Barnett-like effect at the femtometre scale.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the Barnett effect—the magnetization or polarization of matter by rotation—takes a geometric form in the smallest, most vortical fluid in the laboratory: the fireball of a relativistic heavy-ion collision. Using the UrQMD transport model for Au+Au collisions at beam energies from 2.24 to 7.7 GeV, the authors find that the global spin polarization of Λ hyperons and the tilt angle of the pion-emitting source fall on a nearly linear curve, $P_\Lambda = (0.072 \pm 0.010)\,\theta_s$, and that published E895, HADES, and STAR measurements trace the same line. The mechanism is that the thermal vorticity in the reaction plane is quadrupolar, with opposite-sign contributions in the four quadrants that almost cancel; a finite source tilt breaks that cancellation and leaves a residual polarization proportional to $\theta_s$ at leading order. If the paper is right, hyperon spin at the femtometre scale is written by the shape of the fireball as well as its rotation, tying two independently measured observables—hyperon spin and two-pion femtoscopy—into one scaling law and explaining why polarization falls with collision energy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quadrupolar thermal vorticity $\varpi_{zx}$ in the reaction plane, which alternates sign across the four quadrants and whose opposing contributions to $\Lambda$ polarization nearly cancel each other. The argument runs through three linked tools: the spin-vorticity formula $P^\mu \propto \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} p_\nu \varpi_{\rho\sigma}$ that converts local thermal vorticity into hyperon polarization; azimuthally sensitive two-pion Hanbury Brown–Twiss interferometry, whose Fourier-decomposed correlation radii give the tilt angle through $\theta_s \simeq \tfrac{1}{2} \tan^{-1}\!\bigl(-4R^2_{sl,1}/(R^2_{l,0} - R^2_{s,0} + 2R^2_{s,2})\bigr)$; and a small-angle area-difference estimate, Eq. (11), which links the two as $P_\Lambda \simeq \frac{E}{2m}\frac{2(R_a^2 - R_b^2)}{\pi R_a R_b}\,|\varpi_{zx}|\,\theta_s$. A tilted ellipse places more emission area in the two same-sign quadrants than in the two opposite-sign quadrants, so the survival of a net polarization is, at leading order, a purely geometric effect.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a scaling relation: in Au+Au collisions across $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 2.24$–$7.7$ GeV, the global $\Lambda$ polarization $P_\Lambda$ and the source tilt angle $\theta_s$ extracted from azimuthally sensitive two-pion femtoscopy obey a nearly linear law, fitted to experimental data as $P_\Lambda = (0.072 \pm 0.010)\,\theta_s$ (Eq. 5). The paper traces this law to the quadrupolar structure of the thermal vorticity $\varpi_{zx}$ in the reaction plane: contributions from the first and third quadrants align with the system angular momentum while those from the other two quadrants oppose it, so the global polarization largely cancels, and the cancellation becomes ever more complete as the collision approaches longitudinal boost invariance. A finite tilt of the emission ellipsoid unbalances the quadrupole and leaves a leading-order residual $P_\Lambda \propto |\varpi_{zx}|\,\theta_s$, which the authors present as a geometry-modulated, Barnett-like spin response: unlike a rigid rotator, in which polarization is governed by angular velocity over temperature, the spin signal here is set jointly by the local vorticity field and the inclined emission geometry, at femtometre scales and temperatures above $10^{12}$ K.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the nearly linear $P_\Lambda$–$\theta_s$ correlation is a causal geometric effect—the tilt unbalances a self-cancelling quadrupole vorticity—rather than a coincidence of shared collision-energy dependence, since both quantities are computed from the same UrQMD events, both fall monotonically with beam energy, and the experimental points tracing the same line are sparse with unpropagated tilt uncertainties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The monotonic fall of $\Lambda$ polarization with collision energy is explained as a consequence of the source tilt shrinking toward longitudinal boost invariance, rather than as the result of a separate suppression mechanism.
Two independently measured observables—hyperon spin polarization and pion femtoscopic source geometry—are tied into one scaling law, so joint precision measurements with unified centrality selections and momentum acceptances would sharpen the quantitative test.
The response is distinguished from a rigid-body Barnett effect: the observable is set by $|\varpi_{zx}|\,\theta_s$ rather than by a single angular velocity over temperature, so spin polarization carries information about emission geometry that rigid rotation would not.
The fitted line also describes STAR preliminary points at 14.5 and 27 GeV, beyond the simulated energy range, suggesting the relation may extend to higher beam energies.
Applying the same femtoscopic geometry probe to other spin observables could clarify the microscopic origin of spin–spin correlations and provide a new probe of the chiral phase transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because both $P_\Lambda$ and $\theta_s$ come from the same UrQMD events and both drop with beam energy, part of the linearity may be built in; the cleanest decisive test would vary $\theta_s$ at fixed energy—by centrality selection—and check that $P_\Lambda$ follows it.
The analytic normalization of Eq. (11) uses representative parameters ($E/m \approx 1.7$, $R_a/R_b \approx 2.2$, $|\varpi_{zx}| \approx 0.07$) that the paper itself labels 'representative,' and the model neglects vorticity variations and realistic emission weights, so deriving those inputs self-consistently from the transport cells would turn the mechanism from illustrative into predictive.
If the mechanism is genuinely geometric, the residual polarization should be odd under a flip of the tilt orientation in the reaction plane: re-weighting events by the sign of $\langle \tilde{x}\tilde{z}\rangle$ should reverse the sign of $P_\Lambda$ relative to $\mathbf{J}_{\rm sys}$, a parity-odd signature that a rigid-rotation picture alone would not produce.
The analogy suggests an extreme-case prediction: ultra-central collisions and small systems whose sources are nearly untilted should show strongly suppressed global polarization even where local vorticity is large, because it is the geometry, not the rotation, that makes the quadrupole imbalance visible.

Original abstract

The Barnett effect refers to the spontaneous magnetization or polarization of rotating matter via spin-orbit coupling, a fundamental phenomenon observed across a multitude of physical systems down to atomic scales. Here, we demonstrate that this effect extends to subatomic regimes within relativistic heavy-ion collisions, where the most vortical fluid ever created in terrestrial laboratories is produced and the orbital angular momentum is transferred to emitted hadrons via spin-vorticity coupling. By performing transport simulations spanning a broad energy range, we discover a nearly-linear scaling relation between the global spin polarization of $\Lambda$ hyperons and the source tilt angle extracted via two-pion femtoscopic correlations. This scaling reveals that global $\Lambda$ polarization induced by the local vorticity field is modulated by the inclined geometry of the produced strongly-interacting nuclear matter in these collisions. Supported by existing experimental measurements, our results unravel a geometry-modulated Barnett-like effect at the femtometre ($10^{-15}$ m) scale.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-27: 1 request, 4,426 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.23 · compares with prior results 0.56 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The Barnett effect refers to the spontaneous magnetization or polarization of rotating matter via spin-orbit coupling, a fundamental phenomenon observed across a multitude of physical systems down to atomic scales. Here, we demonstrate that this effect extends to subatomic regimes within relativistic heavy-ion collisions, where the most vortical fluid ever created in terrestrial laboratories is produced and the orbital angular momentum is transferred to emitted hadrons via spin-vorticity coupling. By performing transport simulations spanning a broad energy range, we discover a nearly-linear scaling relation between the global spin polarization of $\Lambda$ hyperons and the source tilt angle extracted via two-pion femtoscopic correlations. This scaling reveals that global $\Lambda$ polarization induced by the local vorticity field is modulated by the inclined geometry of the produced strongly-interacting nuclear matter in these collisions. Supported by existing experimental measurements, our results unravel a geometry-modulated Barnett-like effect at the femtometre ($10^{-15}$ m) scale.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The Barnett effect refers to the spontaneous magnetization or polarization of rotating matter via spin-orbit coupling, a fundamental phenomenon observed across a multitude of physical systems down to atomic scales.	background 1.00	0.03	0.03	asserted 1.00
s1	Here, we demonstrate that this effect extends to subatomic regimes within relativistic heavy-ion collisions, where the most vortical fluid ever created in terrestrial laboratories is produced and the orbital angular momentum is transferred to emitted hadrons via spin-vorticity coupling.	contribution 0.95	0.80	0.53	asserted 1.00
s2	By performing transport simulations spanning a broad energy range, we discover a nearly-linear scaling relation between the global spin polarization of $\Lambda$ hyperons and the source tilt angle extracted via two-pion femtoscopic correlations.	result 0.97	0.97	0.34	asserted 1.00
s3	This scaling reveals that global $\Lambda$ polarization induced by the local vorticity field is modulated by the inclined geometry of the produced strongly-interacting nuclear matter in these collisions.	interpretation 0.98	0.83	0.47	asserted 0.99
s4	Supported by existing experimental measurements, our results unravel a geometry-modulated Barnett-like effect at the femtometre ($10^{-15}$ m) scale.	interpretation 0.77	0.83	0.69	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** Schematic illustration of semicentral relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Two spectator fragments propagate along the beam (z) axis, leaving strongly-interacting vortical matter near mid-rapidity. The average vorticity points along the total orbital angular momentum Jsys, perpendicular to the reaction (z–x) plane. Spinning tops represent Λ hyperons, and θs denotes the tilt of the emission source relative to the beam direction. The purple curled arrow indicates the direction of Jsys, rather than a global rotational flow. Experimentally, the reaction plane is reconstructed from the d

**Figure 2.** Collision-energy dependence of (a) global Λ polarization (PΛ) and (b) source tilt angle (θs in radian) in Au+Au collisions. Theoretical results for global Λ polarization (orange band) are obtained with UrQMD for 20–50% Au+Au collisions in mid-rapidity |y| < 1 at √ sNN = 2.24– 7.7 GeV . The source tilt angle (blue band) is calculated at 10–30% centrality over the same energy range. Experimental data, with combined statistical and systematic uncertainties, are from the E895 [34], HADES [13, 35], and STAR [11, 36, 37] Collaborations. For consistency with other measurements, π/2 is…

**Figure 3.** Polarization-tilt correlation in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Global Λ polarization (PΛ) versus the source tilt angle (θs). Theoretical results shown by the orange band are obtained with UrQMD for Au+Au collisions at √ sNN = 2.24–7.7 GeV with 20–50% centrality for PΛ and 10–30% for θs. Experimental data of PΛ, with combined statistical and systematic uncertainties, are taken from Refs. [11, 13, 34–37]. For the data point at √ sNN = 3 GeV denoted by E895-STAR, the source tilt angle is derived by interpolating the values at the neighboring AGS energies, 2.73 and 3.37 GeV, wh

**Figure 4.** Thermal vorticity and its quadrupolar structure in the reaction plane. (a) Distribution of the thermal vorticity component ϖzx in the reaction plane from UrQMD simulations of Au+Au collisions at √ sNN = 7.7 GeV in the 30–40% centrality class at t = 15 fm/c. (b) Schematic of the tilted source and quadrupolar vorticity in the reaction plane. The fireball is depicted as an ellipse tilted by an angle θs, with the vorticity exhibiting a quadrupolar pattern. y 2 2σ 2 y′ − (x sin θs+z cos θs) 2 2σ 2 z′ − t 2 2σ 2 t ] where σt denotes the emission duration, σx′ ,y′ ,z′ denotes the width…

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.35310 by the authors.

References

Works cited (51)

[1]

Schwartz, M.D.: Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, 1st edn., p. 850. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

View on Pith 2014
[2]

Barnett, S.J.: Magnetization by rotation. Phys. Rev.6, 239–270 (1915) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRev.6.239

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrev.6.239 1915
[3]

Barnett, S.J.: Magnetization by rotation. Sci- ence48(1239), 303–309 (1918) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.48.1239.303

View on Pith doi:10.1126/science.48.1239.303 1918
[4]

Arabgol, M., Sleator, T.: Observation of the nuclear barnett effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 177202 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.177202

View on Pith 2019
[5]

Davies, C.S., Fennema, F.G.N., Tsukamoto, A., Razdolski, I., Kimel, A.V., Kirilyuk, A.: Phononic switching of magnetization by the ultrafast Barnett effect. Nature 628(8008), 540–544 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-024-07200-x

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07200-x 2024
[6]

Wood, A.A., Lilette, E., Fein, Y.Y., Peruni- cic, V.S., Hollenberg, L.C.L., Scholten, R.E., Martin, A.M.: Magnetic pseudo-fields in a rotating electron–nuclear spin system. Nature Physics13(11), 1070–1073 (2017) https:// doi.org/10.1038/nphys4221

View on Pith doi:10.1038/nphys4221 2017
[7]

Wachter, V., Kusminskiy, S.V., H´ etet, G., Stickler, B.A.: Gyroscopically stabi- lized quantum spin rotors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 073604 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/ zjpt-whpf

View on Pith 2026
[8]

Andronic, A., Braun-Munzinger, P., Redlich, K., Stachel, J.: Decoding the phase struc- ture of QCD via particle production at high energy. Nature561(7723), 321–330 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6 2018
[9]

Liang, Z.-T., Wang, X.-N.: Globally polar- ized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 102301 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94. 102301 . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94 2005
[10]

Voloshin, S.A.: Polarized secondary particles in unpolarized high energy hadron-hadron collisions? (2004) arXiv:nucl-th/0410089

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[11]

Adam, J.,et al.: Global Λ hyperon polar- ization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid. Nature548, 62–65 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23004

View on Pith doi:10.1038/nature23004 2017
[12]

Acharya, S.,et al.: Global polarization of Λ and ¯Λ hyperons in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. C101(4), 044611 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044611 arXiv:1909.01281 [nucl-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 105, 029902 (2022)]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[13]

Abou Yassine, R.,et al.: Measurement of global polarization of Λ hyperons in few-GeV heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B835, 137506 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137506 arXiv:2207.05160 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[14]

Karpenko, I., Becattini, F.: Study of Λ polar- ization in relativistic nuclear collisions at√sNN = 7.7 –200 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(4), 213 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-017-4765-1

View on Pith 2017
[15]

Xie, Y., Wang, D., Csernai, L.P.: Global Λ polarization in high energy collisions. Phys. Rev. C95(3), 031901 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.031901

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.031901 2017
[16]

Fu, B., Xu, K., Huang, X.-G., Song, H.: 6 Hydrodynamic study of hyperon spin polar- ization in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C103(2), 024903 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024903

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.024903 2021
[17]

Ivanov, Y.B.: Global Λ polarization in heavy- ion collisions at high baryon density. Phys. Rev. C112(1), 014902 (2025) https:// doi.org/10.1103/qn56-fvnq arXiv:2504.12200 [nucl-th]

View on Pith arXiv 2025
[18]

Jiang, Y., Lin, Z.-W., Liao, J.: Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C94(4), 044910 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94. 044910 arXiv:1602.06580 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 95, 049904 (2017)]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[19]

Li, H., Pang, L.-G., Wang, Q., Xia, X.- L.: Global Λ polarization in heavy-ion col- lisions from a transport model. Phys. Rev. C96(5), 054908 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.96.054908

View on Pith 2017
[20]

Shi, S., Li, K., Liao, J.: Searching for the Subatomic Swirls in the CuCu and CuAu Collisions. Phys. Lett. B788, 409–413 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2018.09.066 arXiv:1712.00878 [nucl- th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[21]

Deng, X.-G., Huang, X.-G., Ma, Y.-G.: Lambda polarization in 108Ag+108Ag and 197Au+197Au collisions around a few GeV. Phys. Lett. B835, 137560 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137560

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137560 2022
[22]

Becattini, F., Lisa, M.A.: Polariza- tion and Vorticity in the Quark–Gluon Plasma. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 395–423 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-nucl-021920-095245

View on Pith 2020
[23]

Niida, T., Voloshin, S.A.: Polarization phenomenon in heavy-ion collisions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33(09), 2430010 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301324300108 arXiv:2404.11042 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[24]

Becattini, F., Buzzegoli, M., Niida, T., Pu, S., Tang, A.-H., Wang, Q.: Spin polarization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33(06), 2430006 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1142/9789811294679 0005

View on Pith doi:10.1142/9789811294679 2024
[25]

Chen, J.-H., Liang, Z.-T., Ma, Y.-G., Sheng, X.-L., Wang, Q.: Vector meson’s spin align- ments in high energy reactions. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(1), 211001 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-024-2495-1 arXiv:2407.06480 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[26]

Hanbury Brown, R., Twiss, R.Q.: A Test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sir- ius. Nature178, 1046–1048 (1956) https:// doi.org/10.1038/1781046a0

View on Pith doi:10.1038/1781046a0 1956
[27]

Pratt, S.: Pion Interferometry for Exploding Sources. Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1219– 1221 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.53.1219

View on Pith 1984
[28]

Heinz, U.W., Jacak, B.V.: Two particle correlations in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.49, 529– 579 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. nucl.49.1.529 arXiv:nucl-th/9902020

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[29]

Lisa, M.A., Pratt, S., Soltz, R., Wiede- mann, U.: Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55, 357–402 (2005) https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151533 arXiv:nucl-ex/0505014

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[30]

Lisa, M.A., Heinz, U.W., Wiedemann, U.A.: Tilted pion sources from azimuthally sen- sitive HBT interferometry. Phys. Lett. B489, 287–292 (2000) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00952-7 arXiv:nucl- th/0003022

View on Pith doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00952-7 2000
[31]

Mount, E., Graef, G., Mitrovski, M., Bleicher, M., Lisa, M.A.: Correspondence between HBT radii and the emission zone in non- central heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 84, 014908 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.84.014908 arXiv:1012.5941 [nucl- th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[32]

Lisa, M.A., Frodermann, E., Graef, G., Mitrovski, M., Mount, E., Petersen, H., Bleicher, M.: Shape analysis of strongly- interacting systems: The Heavy ion case. 7 New J. Phys.13, 065006 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065006 arXiv:1104.5267 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[33]

Khyzhniak, Y., Lisa, M.A.: Pair momentum dependence of a tilted source in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C111(2), 024902 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 111.024902 arXiv:2410.15134 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[34]

Lisa, M.A.,et al.: Azimuthal dependence of pion interferometry at the AGS. Phys. Lett. B496, 1–8 (2000) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01280-6 arXiv:nucl- ex/0007022

View on Pith doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)01280-6 2000
[35]

Adamczewski-Musch, J.,et al.: Identical pion intensity interferometry at √sNN = 2.4 GeV: HADES collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. A56(5), 140 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/s10050-020-00116-w arXiv:1910.07885 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[36]

Abdallah, M.S.,et al.: Global Λ-hyperon polarization in Au+Au collisions at√sN N=3 GeV. Phys. Rev. C104(6), 061901 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 104.L061901 arXiv:2108.00044 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith arXiv 2021
[37]

al., B.E.A.e.: Tilted geometry of the pion emission source in au+au collisions in the beam energy scan at the bnl relativistic heavy ion collider. Phys. Rev. C (2026) https:// doi.org/10.1103/zzcf-hysy arXiv:2605.15013 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[38]

Bass, S.A.,et al.: Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.41, 255–369 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1 arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[39]

Bleicher, M.,et al.: Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model. J. Phys. G25, 1859–1896 (1999) https://doi. org/10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 arXiv:hep- ph/9909407

View on Pith doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 1999
[40]

Becattini, F., Chandra, V., Del Zanna, L., Grossi, E.: Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermo- dynamical equilibrium. Annals Phys.338, 32–49 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop. 2013.07.004

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.aop 2013
[41]

Liu, D.-N., Steinheimer, J., Sun, K.-J., Chen, J.-H., Ma, Y.-G., Bleicher, M.: Hadron polar- ization and equation of state at F AIR/RHIC- BES energies (2026) arXiv:2606.13333 [nucl- th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[42]

Pratt, S.,et al.: Testing transport theories with correlation measurements. Nucl. Phys. A566, 103–114 (1994) https://doi.org/10. 1016/0375-9474(94)90614-9

View on Pith 1994
[43]

Aboona, B.E.,et al.: Measuring spin correlation between quarks during QCD con- finement. Nature650(8100), 65–71 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09920-0 arXiv:2506.05499 [hep-ex]

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[44]

Abdallah, M.S.,et al.: Pattern of global spin alignment ofϕand K ∗0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions. Nature614(7947), 244–248 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05557-5 arXiv:2204.02302 [hep-ph]

View on Pith arXiv 2023
[45]

Zhang, K., Wang, X., Luo, X.: Spin Fem- toscopy: A Framework for Revealing Genuine Spin Correlations (2026) arXiv:2607.00413 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[46]

Kiefer, L., Dash, A., Rischke, D.H.: Mag- netization by rotation: Spin and chiral con- densates in the NJL model. Phys. Rev. D 113(9), 094032 (2026) https://doi.org/10. 1103/t7wz-nvv9 arXiv:2509.18881 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[47]

Becattini, F., Piccinini, F., Rizzo, J.: Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion col- lisions at very high energy. Phys. Rev. C 77, 024906 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.77.024906

View on Pith 2008
[48]

Becattini, F., Csernai, L., Wang, D.J.: Λ polarization in peripheral heavy ion colli- sions. Phys. Rev. C88(3), 034905 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88. 034905 . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 93, 069901 (2016)] 8

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevc.88 2013
[49]

Becattini, F., Karpenko, I., Lisa, M., Upsal, I., Voloshin, S.: Global hyperon polarization at local thermodynamic equilibrium with vor- ticity, magnetic field and feed-down. Phys. Rev. C95(5), 054902 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054902

View on Pith Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.054902 2017
[50]

He, J.J., Zhang, S., Ma, Y.G., Chen, J.H., Zhong, C.: Clustering structure effect on Hanbury-Brown–Twiss correlation in 12C+197Au collisions at 200 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. A56, 52 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/s10050-019-00002-0

View on Pith 2020
[51]

Wang, D.-F., Chen, M.-Y., Ma, Y.-G., Shou, Q.-Y., Zhang, S., Zheng, L.: Investigating the pion emission source in pp collisions using the ampt model with subnucleon structure. Nucl. Sci. Tech.36, 154 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s41365-025-01722-3 9 Methods Global Λ polarization.We employ the Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics (UrQMD) transp...

View on Pith 2025

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

Schwartz, M.D.: Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, 1st edn., p. 850. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

View on Pith 2014

[2] [2]

Barnett, S.J.: Magnetization by rotation. Phys. Rev.6, 239–270 (1915) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRev.6.239

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrev.6.239 1915

[3] [3]

Barnett, S.J.: Magnetization by rotation. Sci- ence48(1239), 303–309 (1918) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.48.1239.303

View on Pith doi:10.1126/science.48.1239.303 1918

[4] [4]

Arabgol, M., Sleator, T.: Observation of the nuclear barnett effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 177202 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.177202

View on Pith 2019

[5] [5]

Davies, C.S., Fennema, F.G.N., Tsukamoto, A., Razdolski, I., Kimel, A.V., Kirilyuk, A.: Phononic switching of magnetization by the ultrafast Barnett effect. Nature 628(8008), 540–544 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-024-07200-x

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07200-x 2024

[6] [6]

Wood, A.A., Lilette, E., Fein, Y.Y., Peruni- cic, V.S., Hollenberg, L.C.L., Scholten, R.E., Martin, A.M.: Magnetic pseudo-fields in a rotating electron–nuclear spin system. Nature Physics13(11), 1070–1073 (2017) https:// doi.org/10.1038/nphys4221

View on Pith doi:10.1038/nphys4221 2017

[7] [7]

Wachter, V., Kusminskiy, S.V., H´ etet, G., Stickler, B.A.: Gyroscopically stabi- lized quantum spin rotors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 073604 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/ zjpt-whpf

View on Pith 2026

[8] [8]

Andronic, A., Braun-Munzinger, P., Redlich, K., Stachel, J.: Decoding the phase struc- ture of QCD via particle production at high energy. Nature561(7723), 321–330 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6 2018

[9] [9]

Liang, Z.-T., Wang, X.-N.: Globally polar- ized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 102301 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94. 102301 . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94 2005

[10] [10]

Voloshin, S.A.: Polarized secondary particles in unpolarized high energy hadron-hadron collisions? (2004) arXiv:nucl-th/0410089

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[11] [11]

Adam, J.,et al.: Global Λ hyperon polar- ization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid. Nature548, 62–65 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23004

View on Pith doi:10.1038/nature23004 2017

[12] [12]

Acharya, S.,et al.: Global polarization of Λ and ¯Λ hyperons in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. C101(4), 044611 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044611 arXiv:1909.01281 [nucl-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 105, 029902 (2022)]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[13] [13]

Abou Yassine, R.,et al.: Measurement of global polarization of Λ hyperons in few-GeV heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B835, 137506 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137506 arXiv:2207.05160 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[14] [14]

Karpenko, I., Becattini, F.: Study of Λ polar- ization in relativistic nuclear collisions at√sNN = 7.7 –200 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(4), 213 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-017-4765-1

View on Pith 2017

[15] [15]

Xie, Y., Wang, D., Csernai, L.P.: Global Λ polarization in high energy collisions. Phys. Rev. C95(3), 031901 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.031901

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.031901 2017

[16] [16]

Fu, B., Xu, K., Huang, X.-G., Song, H.: 6 Hydrodynamic study of hyperon spin polar- ization in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C103(2), 024903 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024903

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.024903 2021

[17] [17]

Ivanov, Y.B.: Global Λ polarization in heavy- ion collisions at high baryon density. Phys. Rev. C112(1), 014902 (2025) https:// doi.org/10.1103/qn56-fvnq arXiv:2504.12200 [nucl-th]

View on Pith arXiv 2025

[18] [18]

Jiang, Y., Lin, Z.-W., Liao, J.: Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C94(4), 044910 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94. 044910 arXiv:1602.06580 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 95, 049904 (2017)]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[19] [19]

Li, H., Pang, L.-G., Wang, Q., Xia, X.- L.: Global Λ polarization in heavy-ion col- lisions from a transport model. Phys. Rev. C96(5), 054908 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.96.054908

View on Pith 2017

[20] [20]

Shi, S., Li, K., Liao, J.: Searching for the Subatomic Swirls in the CuCu and CuAu Collisions. Phys. Lett. B788, 409–413 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2018.09.066 arXiv:1712.00878 [nucl- th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[21] [21]

Deng, X.-G., Huang, X.-G., Ma, Y.-G.: Lambda polarization in 108Ag+108Ag and 197Au+197Au collisions around a few GeV. Phys. Lett. B835, 137560 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137560

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137560 2022

[22] [22]

Becattini, F., Lisa, M.A.: Polariza- tion and Vorticity in the Quark–Gluon Plasma. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 395–423 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-nucl-021920-095245

View on Pith 2020

[23] [23]

Niida, T., Voloshin, S.A.: Polarization phenomenon in heavy-ion collisions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33(09), 2430010 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301324300108 arXiv:2404.11042 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[24] [24]

Becattini, F., Buzzegoli, M., Niida, T., Pu, S., Tang, A.-H., Wang, Q.: Spin polarization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33(06), 2430006 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1142/9789811294679 0005

View on Pith doi:10.1142/9789811294679 2024

[25] [25]

Chen, J.-H., Liang, Z.-T., Ma, Y.-G., Sheng, X.-L., Wang, Q.: Vector meson’s spin align- ments in high energy reactions. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(1), 211001 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-024-2495-1 arXiv:2407.06480 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[26] [26]

Hanbury Brown, R., Twiss, R.Q.: A Test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sir- ius. Nature178, 1046–1048 (1956) https:// doi.org/10.1038/1781046a0

View on Pith doi:10.1038/1781046a0 1956

[27] [27]

Pratt, S.: Pion Interferometry for Exploding Sources. Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1219– 1221 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.53.1219

View on Pith 1984

[28] [28]

Heinz, U.W., Jacak, B.V.: Two particle correlations in relativistic heavy ion colli- sions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.49, 529– 579 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. nucl.49.1.529 arXiv:nucl-th/9902020

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[29] [29]

Lisa, M.A., Pratt, S., Soltz, R., Wiede- mann, U.: Femtoscopy in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55, 357–402 (2005) https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151533 arXiv:nucl-ex/0505014

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[30] [30]

Lisa, M.A., Heinz, U.W., Wiedemann, U.A.: Tilted pion sources from azimuthally sen- sitive HBT interferometry. Phys. Lett. B489, 287–292 (2000) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00952-7 arXiv:nucl- th/0003022

View on Pith doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00952-7 2000

[31] [31]

Mount, E., Graef, G., Mitrovski, M., Bleicher, M., Lisa, M.A.: Correspondence between HBT radii and the emission zone in non- central heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 84, 014908 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.84.014908 arXiv:1012.5941 [nucl- th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[32] [32]

Lisa, M.A., Frodermann, E., Graef, G., Mitrovski, M., Mount, E., Petersen, H., Bleicher, M.: Shape analysis of strongly- interacting systems: The Heavy ion case. 7 New J. Phys.13, 065006 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065006 arXiv:1104.5267 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[33] [33]

Khyzhniak, Y., Lisa, M.A.: Pair momentum dependence of a tilted source in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C111(2), 024902 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 111.024902 arXiv:2410.15134 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[34] [34]

Lisa, M.A.,et al.: Azimuthal dependence of pion interferometry at the AGS. Phys. Lett. B496, 1–8 (2000) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01280-6 arXiv:nucl- ex/0007022

View on Pith doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)01280-6 2000

[35] [35]

Adamczewski-Musch, J.,et al.: Identical pion intensity interferometry at √sNN = 2.4 GeV: HADES collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. A56(5), 140 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/s10050-020-00116-w arXiv:1910.07885 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[36] [36]

Abdallah, M.S.,et al.: Global Λ-hyperon polarization in Au+Au collisions at√sN N=3 GeV. Phys. Rev. C104(6), 061901 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 104.L061901 arXiv:2108.00044 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith arXiv 2021

[37] [37]

al., B.E.A.e.: Tilted geometry of the pion emission source in au+au collisions in the beam energy scan at the bnl relativistic heavy ion collider. Phys. Rev. C (2026) https:// doi.org/10.1103/zzcf-hysy arXiv:2605.15013 [nucl-ex]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[38] [38]

Bass, S.A.,et al.: Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.41, 255–369 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1 arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[39] [39]

Bleicher, M.,et al.: Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model. J. Phys. G25, 1859–1896 (1999) https://doi. org/10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 arXiv:hep- ph/9909407

View on Pith doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 1999

[40] [40]

Becattini, F., Chandra, V., Del Zanna, L., Grossi, E.: Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermo- dynamical equilibrium. Annals Phys.338, 32–49 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop. 2013.07.004

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.aop 2013

[41] [41]

Liu, D.-N., Steinheimer, J., Sun, K.-J., Chen, J.-H., Ma, Y.-G., Bleicher, M.: Hadron polar- ization and equation of state at F AIR/RHIC- BES energies (2026) arXiv:2606.13333 [nucl- th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[42] [42]

Pratt, S.,et al.: Testing transport theories with correlation measurements. Nucl. Phys. A566, 103–114 (1994) https://doi.org/10. 1016/0375-9474(94)90614-9

View on Pith 1994

[43] [43]

Aboona, B.E.,et al.: Measuring spin correlation between quarks during QCD con- finement. Nature650(8100), 65–71 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09920-0 arXiv:2506.05499 [hep-ex]

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[44] [44]

Abdallah, M.S.,et al.: Pattern of global spin alignment ofϕand K ∗0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions. Nature614(7947), 244–248 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05557-5 arXiv:2204.02302 [hep-ph]

View on Pith arXiv 2023

[45] [45]

Zhang, K., Wang, X., Luo, X.: Spin Fem- toscopy: A Framework for Revealing Genuine Spin Correlations (2026) arXiv:2607.00413 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[46] [46]

Kiefer, L., Dash, A., Rischke, D.H.: Mag- netization by rotation: Spin and chiral con- densates in the NJL model. Phys. Rev. D 113(9), 094032 (2026) https://doi.org/10. 1103/t7wz-nvv9 arXiv:2509.18881 [nucl-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[47] [47]

Becattini, F., Piccinini, F., Rizzo, J.: Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion col- lisions at very high energy. Phys. Rev. C 77, 024906 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.77.024906

View on Pith 2008

[48] [48]

Becattini, F., Csernai, L., Wang, D.J.: Λ polarization in peripheral heavy ion colli- sions. Phys. Rev. C88(3), 034905 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88. 034905 . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 93, 069901 (2016)] 8

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevc.88 2013

[49] [49]

Becattini, F., Karpenko, I., Lisa, M., Upsal, I., Voloshin, S.: Global hyperon polarization at local thermodynamic equilibrium with vor- ticity, magnetic field and feed-down. Phys. Rev. C95(5), 054902 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054902

View on Pith Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.054902 2017

[50] [50]

He, J.J., Zhang, S., Ma, Y.G., Chen, J.H., Zhong, C.: Clustering structure effect on Hanbury-Brown–Twiss correlation in 12C+197Au collisions at 200 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. A56, 52 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epja/s10050-019-00002-0

View on Pith 2020

[51] [51]

Wang, D.-F., Chen, M.-Y., Ma, Y.-G., Shou, Q.-Y., Zhang, S., Zheng, L.: Investigating the pion emission source in pp collisions using the ampt model with subnucleon structure. Nucl. Sci. Tech.36, 154 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s41365-025-01722-3 9 Methods Global Λ polarization.We employ the Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics (UrQMD) transp...

View on Pith 2025