pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00812 · v1 · pith:2VQDT5NSnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌀 gr-qc

Gravitational Wave Signatures of Schwarzschild Black Hole in a Generalized Dehnen-Type (1,4,γ) Dark Matter Halo

Bahromjon Shokirov , Arabboy Mirzakulov , Tursunali Xamidov , Sanjar Shaymatov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 09:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesdark matter haloDehnen profileextreme mass ratio inspiralsSchwarzschild black holetimelike geodesicsnumerical kludge waveforms
0
0 comments X

The pith

A generalized Dehnen dark matter halo around a Schwarzschild black hole enlarges periodic orbits and lowers gravitational wave amplitudes from extreme mass ratio inspirals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a generalized Dehnen-type dark matter halo alters the motion of test particles around a Schwarzschild black hole. It finds that higher values of the density profile parameter gamma push the marginally bound and innermost stable circular orbits outward while raising the energy at the ISCO. Using numerical kludge waveforms, the authors show that larger halo parameters result in longer orbital periods, larger orbits, and reduced wave amplitudes, with characteristic strains potentially detectable by space-based observatories like LISA in the millihertz band. This suggests that dark matter distributions could imprint observable features on gravitational wave signals from extreme mass ratio inspirals.

Core claim

The generalized Dehnen-type (1,4,gamma) dark matter halo modifies timelike geodesic motion by increasing the radii and angular momenta of the marginally bound orbit and innermost stable circular orbit as gamma increases, and produces gravitational wave signals from periodic orbits that have lower amplitudes and longer periods, with spectra mainly in the millihertz range where some peaks exceed the sensitivity of LISA, Taiji, and TianQin.

What carries the argument

The numerical kludge approach applied to periodic orbits in the modified Schwarzschild metric with Dehnen halo, used to generate orbital trajectories and gravitational wave polarizations.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the numerical kludge method accurately captures the gravitational wave emission when the spacetime is modified by the dark matter halo.

What would settle it

Detection of EMRI signals showing no shift in orbital periods or amplitudes compared to standard Schwarzschild predictions for the same black hole mass, or signals that deviate in a way inconsistent with the predicted halo-induced changes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00812 by Arabboy Mirzakulov, Bahromjon Shokirov, Sanjar Shaymatov, Tursunali Xamidov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Radial dependence of the effective potential for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: MBO and ISCO parameters for different values of the Dehnen-type halo parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Dependence of the rational number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Periodic orbits around a generalized Schwarzschild-like BH surrounded by a Dehnen-type DM halo are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Periodic orbits around a generalized Schwarzschild-like BH surrounded by a Dehnen-type DM halo are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Periodic orbits and the corresponding gravitational-wave polarizations for an EMRI system consisting of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The (3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Frequency spectra of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Characteristic strains of the gravitational-wave signals compared with the sensitivity curves of LISA, Taiji, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate timelike geodesic motion, periodic orbits, and the associated gravitational-wave signals around a Schwarzschild-like black hole (BH) embedded in a generalized Dehnen-type dark matter (DM) halo. We show that the Dehnen-type $(1,4,\gamma)$ DM halo profile modifies test-particle dynamics, with increasing the parameter of density profile, $\gamma$, leading to larger marginally bound orbit (MBO) and innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) radii and angular momenta, together with a higher ISCO energy. These findings provide further insight into the role of the DM distribution in modifying the orbital dynamics, energy, and angular momentum of timelike test particles near the BH. Furthermore, we investigate the gravitational-wave signals produced by a stellar-mass compact object moving along periodic orbits around a supermassive BH embedded in a generalized Dehnen-type DM halo. Using the numerical kludge approach, we calculate the orbital trajectories and the corresponding gravitational-wave polarizations. We find that increasing the halo parameters $\gamma$, $\rho_s$, and $r_s$ produces larger periodic orbits, longer orbital periods, and lower waveform amplitudes. The resulting spectra lie mainly in the millihertz frequency range, while several characteristic-strain peaks lie above the sensitivity curves of future space-based gravitational-wave detectors such as LISA, Taiji, and TianQin. These results suggest that the surrounding DM halo may leave observable imprints on extreme mass-ratio inspiral (EMRI) gravitational-wave signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines timelike geodesic motion and periodic orbits around a Schwarzschild-like black hole embedded in a generalized Dehnen-type (1,4,γ) dark matter halo, reporting that increasing γ enlarges the marginally bound orbit and innermost stable circular orbit radii, increases the associated angular momenta, and raises the ISCO energy. It then uses the numerical kludge approach to compute gravitational waveforms for stellar-mass compact objects on periodic orbits, finding that larger values of γ, ρ_s, and r_s produce larger orbits, longer periods, and lower waveform amplitudes whose spectra lie mainly in the millihertz band with some characteristic-strain peaks above the sensitivity curves of LISA, Taiji, and TianQin, suggesting possible observable imprints on EMRI signals.

Significance. If the numerical-kludge results are shown to be reliable in the modified metric, the work would provide a concrete example of how a specific DM halo profile can alter EMRI waveforms in a manner potentially distinguishable by future space-based detectors, adding to the literature on environmental effects in extreme-mass-ratio systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the waveform section: the central claim that the Dehnen halo produces distinguishable EMRI signals rests on numerical-kludge waveforms, yet no derivation or test is supplied showing that the kludge error bounds (geodesic motion plus quadrupole/octupole moments under vacuum or perturbative assumptions) remain controlled when the metric is altered globally at all radii by the halo, changing both the effective potential and asymptotic structure.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported trends in waveform amplitude and period are generated by varying the same three halo parameters (γ, ρ_s, r_s) that define the background; without an external benchmark, analytic limit comparison, or parameter-free prediction, it is unclear whether the reported spectral differences are unique to this halo or could be mimicked by other environmental effects at comparable levels.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states qualitative trends but supplies no error budgets, comparison against analytic limits, or quantitative measures of distinguishability from other effects.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the waveform section: the central claim that the Dehnen halo produces distinguishable EMRI signals rests on numerical-kludge waveforms, yet no derivation or test is supplied showing that the kludge error bounds (geodesic motion plus quadrupole/octupole moments under vacuum or perturbative assumptions) remain controlled when the metric is altered globally at all radii by the halo, changing both the effective potential and asymptotic structure.

    Authors: The numerical kludge computes exact geodesics in the given metric and approximates the waveform via multipole moments of the source trajectory. The halo modifies the effective potential and thus the orbits, which is the primary effect under study; the wave-generation step remains the standard quadrupole/octupole prescription. While we did not supply a dedicated error-bound derivation for this globally modified metric, the method has been applied to other non-vacuum backgrounds in the EMRI literature. In revision we will add an explicit discussion of the method’s assumptions and limitations in the modified spacetime, together with a statement that a full error analysis lies beyond the present scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported trends in waveform amplitude and period are generated by varying the same three halo parameters (γ, ρ_s, r_s) that define the background; without an external benchmark, analytic limit comparison, or parameter-free prediction, it is unclear whether the reported spectral differences are unique to this halo or could be mimicked by other environmental effects at comparable levels.

    Authors: The manuscript’s benchmark is the vacuum Schwarzschild limit recovered when the halo parameters vanish (γ, ρ_s, r_s → 0). All reported trends are shown relative to this limit. The work does not assert that the spectral features are unique to the (1,4,γ) profile; it demonstrates that this specific halo produces measurable shifts in orbital periods, amplitudes, and characteristic-strain peaks within the millihertz band. Other environments could produce analogous shifts, but the parameter dependence is tied to the Dehnen halo model. We will revise the abstract to state the results as effects within this model rather than as uniquely distinguishable signatures. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A dedicated derivation or numerical validation of the numerical-kludge error bounds for a globally modified metric at all radii.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical computation of halo-modified geodesics and kludge waveforms

full rationale

The paper defines a Schwarzschild-like metric with an added Dehnen (1,4,γ) halo term depending on parameters γ, ρ_s, r_s. It then computes timelike geodesics, effective potentials, MBO/ISCO locations, and periodic orbits directly from that metric. Waveforms are obtained via the numerical kludge method applied to those orbits. The reported trends (larger orbits, longer periods, lower amplitudes with increasing halo parameters) are explicit functions of the metric modification and are not equivalent to the inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or smuggled ansatze appear in the derivation chain. The work is a parameter study whose outputs are computed consequences rather than tautological restatements of the halo profile.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the generalized Dehnen profile correctly describes the dark-matter density and that the kludge method accurately maps the modified metric to waveforms without additional systematic errors.

free parameters (3)
  • γ
    Slope parameter of the density profile; varied to produce larger MBO/ISCO radii.
  • ρ_s
    Central density scale; varied to change orbit size and waveform amplitude.
  • r_s
    Scale radius; varied to change orbit size and waveform amplitude.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The spacetime metric is a Schwarzschild solution modified by the Dehnen halo density profile.
    Invoked to define the background for geodesic motion and waveform generation.
  • domain assumption The numerical kludge method produces sufficiently accurate waveforms for the modified metric.
    Used to compute polarizations without further validation shown in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5835 in / 1415 out tokens · 29700 ms · 2026-07-02T09:03:44.686397+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Schwarzschild, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 189 (1916)

    K. Schwarzschild, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 189 (1916)

    1916

  2. [2]

    S. M. Blinder, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1512.02061 (2015), arXiv:1512.02061 [physics.pop-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    1963

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott and et al. (Virgo and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbott and et al. (Virgo and LIGO Scientific Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Tele- scope Collaboration), Astrophys. J.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Tele- scope Collaboration), Astrophys. J.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Akiyama and et al

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Col- laboration), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Akiyama and et al

    K. Akiyama and et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Col- laboration), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L14 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Psaltiset al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Phys

    D. Psaltiset al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 141104 (2020), arXiv:2010.01055 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Evidence for dark matter in the inner Milky Way

    F. Iocco, M. Pato, and G. Bertone, Nature Phys.11, 245 (2015), arXiv:1502.03821 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    A New Era in the Quest for Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and T. M. P. Tait, Nature562, 51 (2018), arXiv:1810.01668 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    V. C. Rubin and J. Ford, W. Kent, Astrophys. J.159, 379 (1970)

    1970

  15. [15]

    The Extended Rotation Curve and the Dark Matter Halo of M33

    E. Corbelli and P. Salucci, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 311, 441 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9909252 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  16. [16]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J.292, 371 (1985)

    1985

  17. [17]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rep.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  18. [18]

    J. G. de Swart, G. Bertone, and J. van Dongen, Nature Astron.1, 0059 (2017), arXiv:1703.00013 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    R. H. Wechsler and J. L. Tinker, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.56, 435 (2018), arXiv:1804.03097 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Merritt, A

    D. Merritt, A. W. Graham, B. Moore, J. Diemand, and B. Terzi´ c, Astron. J.132, 2685 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0509417 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    A. A. Dutton and A. V. Macci` o, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.441, 3359–3374 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    The Structure of Dark Matter Haloes in Dwarf Galaxies

    A. Burkert, Astrophys. J. Lett.447, L25 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9504041 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  23. [23]

    Dehnen, Mon

    W. Dehnen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.265, 250 (1993)

    1993

  24. [24]

    Astrophys.654, A53 (2021)

    Shukirgaliyev, B., Otebay, A., Sobolenko, M., Ishchenko, M., Borodina, O., Panamarev, T., Myrza- kul, S., Kalambay, M., Naurzbayeva, A., Abdikamalov, E., Polyachenko, E., Banerjee, S., Berczik, P., Spurzem, R., and Just, A., Astron. Astrophys.654, A53 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    M. M. Gohain, P. Phukon, and K. Bhuyan, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101683 (2024), arXiv:2407.02872 [gr-qc] . 13

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    R. C. Pantig and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2022, 056 (2022), arXiv:2202.07404 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Al-Badawi, S

    A. Al-Badawi, S. Shaymatov, and Y. Sekhmani, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025, 014 (2025), arXiv:2411.01145 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Uktamov, S

    U. Uktamov, S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, and C. Yuan, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1432 (2025), arXiv:2505.20031 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Maeda, V

    K.-i. Maeda, V. Cardoso, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044060 (2025), arXiv:2410.04175 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Galactic Dark Matter in the Phantom Field

    M.-H. Li and K.-C. Yang, Phys. Rev. D86, 123015 (2012), arXiv:1204.3178 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    Shaymatov, B

    S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, and M. Jamil, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 588 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Shaymatov, D

    S. Shaymatov, D. Malafarina, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Dark Universe34, 100891 (2021), arXiv:2004.06811 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Shaymatov, P

    S. Shaymatov, P. Sheoran, and S. Siwach, Phys. Rev. D105, 104059 (2022), arXiv:2110.10610 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    X. Hou, Z. Xu, M. Zhou, and J. Wang, J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys.2018, 015 (2018), arXiv:1804.08110 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [36]

    Z. Shen, A. Wang, Y. Gong, and S. Yin, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138797 (2024), arXiv:2311.12259 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [37]

    Z. Shen, A. Wang, and S. Yin, Phys. Lett. B862, 139300 (2025), arXiv:2408.05417 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    S. Lu, A. Ilyas, X.-H. Ma, B. Wang, D. Zhang, and Y.- F. Cai, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2025, 086 (2025), arXiv:2407.19521 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [39]

    Al-Badawi and S

    A. Al-Badawi and S. Shaymatov, Chin. Phys. C49, 055101 (2025), arXiv:2501.15397 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    Al-Badawi and S

    A. Al-Badawi and S. Shaymatov, Commun. Theor. Phys.77, 035402 (2025)

    2025

  40. [41]

    Alloqulov, T

    M. Alloqulov, T. Xamidov, S. Shaymatov, and B. Ahmedov, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 798 (2025), arXiv:2504.05236 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [42]

    Xamidov, U

    T. Xamidov, U. Uktamov, S. Shaymatov, and B. Ahme- dov, Phys. Dark Universe47, 101805 (2025)

    2025

  42. [43]

    Chen, P.-P

    Y. Chen, P.-P. Wang, B. Wang, R. Luo, and C.-G. Shao, Universe12, 48 (2026), arXiv:2603.07158 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [44]

    Xamidov, S

    T. Xamidov, S. Shaymatov, Q. Wu, and T. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1193 (2025), arXiv:2507.13147 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoane and et al. (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna), “Laser interferometer space antenna,” (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [46]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017), https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/4/5/685/31566708/nwx116.pdf

    2017

  46. [47]

    S. A. Hughes, Class. Quantum Gravity18, 4067–4073 (2001)

    2001

  47. [48]

    Relativistic Dynamics and Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals

    P. Amaro-Seoane, Living Rev. Rel.21, 4 (2018), arXiv:1205.5240 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [49]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [50]

    Zoom & Whirl: Eccentric equatorial orbits around spinning black holes and their evolution under gravitational radiation reaction

    K. Glampedakis and D. Kennefick, Phys. Rev. D66, 044002 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0203086 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  50. [51]

    Ruangsri and S

    U. Ruangsri and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D89, 084036 (2014)

    2014

  51. [52]

    J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, Class. Quantum Gravity30, 184001 (2013)

    2013

  52. [53]

    Baracket al., Class

    L. Baracket al., Class. Quantum Gravity36, 143001 (2019)

    2019

  53. [54]

    Dark matter: an efficient catalyst for intermediate-mass-ratio-inspiral events

    X.-J. Yue, W.-B. Han, and X. Chen, Astrophys. J.874, 34 (2019), arXiv:1802.03739 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [55]

    Duque, C

    F. Duque, C. F. B. Macedo, R. Vicente, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 121404 (2024), arXiv:2312.06767 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [56]

    N. Dai, Y. Gong, Y. Zhao, and T. Jiang, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084080 (2024), arXiv:2301.05088 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [57]

    Levin and G

    J. Levin and G. Perez-Giz, Phys. Rev. D77(2008), 10.1103/physrevd.77.103005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.103005 2008

  57. [58]

    Grossman and J

    R. Grossman and J. Levin, Phys. Rev. D79(2009), 10.1103/physrevd.79.043017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.043017 2009

  58. [59]

    Misra and J

    V. Misra and J. Levin, Phys. Rev. D82(2010), 10.1103/physrevd.82.083001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.083001 2010

  59. [60]

    Levin, Class

    J. Levin, Class. Quantum Gravity26, 235010 (2009)

    2009

  60. [61]

    Bambhaniya, D

    P. Bambhaniya, D. N. Solanki, D. Dey, A. B. Joshi, P. S. Joshi, and V. Patel, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 205 (2021), arXiv:2007.12086 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [62]

    Astrophysically relevant bound trajectories around a Kerr black hole

    P. Rana and A. Mangalam, Class. Quantum Gravity36, 045009 (2019), arXiv:1901.02730 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [63]

    Zoom-Whirl Orbits in Black Hole Binaries

    J. Healy, J. Levin, and D. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 131101 (2009), arXiv:0907.0671 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [64]

    Misra and J

    V. Misra and J. Levin, Phys. Rev. D82, 083001 (2010)

    2010

  64. [65]

    General classification of charged test particle circular orbits in Reissner--Nordstr\"om spacetime

    D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo, and R. Ruffini, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 206 (2017), arXiv:1304.2940 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [66]

    G. Z. Babar, A. Z. Babar, and Y.-K. Lim, Phys. Rev. D96, 084052 (2017), arXiv:1710.09581 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [67]

    C. Liu, C. Ding, and J. Jing, Commun. Theor. Phys. 71, 1461 (2019), arXiv:1804.05883 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [68]

    Lin and X.-M

    H.-Y. Lin and X.-M. Deng, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 311 (2023)

    2023

  68. [69]

    Yao and X

    J.-T. Yao and X. Li, Phys. Rev. D108, 084067 (2023)

    2023

  69. [70]

    Z. C. S. Chan and Y.-K. Lim, Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 35 (2025), arXiv:2502.03082 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [71]

    Lin and X.-M

    H.-Y. Lin and X.-M. Deng, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, 176 (2022)

    2022

  71. [72]

    Z.-Y. Tu, T. Zhu, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D108, 024035 (2023)

    2023

  72. [73]

    Deng, Phys

    X.-M. Deng, Phys. Dark Universe30, 100629 (2020)

    2020

  73. [74]

    S.-W. Wei, J. Yang, and Y.-X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D99, 104016 (2019), arXiv:1904.03129 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [75]

    Zhang and Y

    J. Zhang and Y. Xie, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 854 (2022)

    2022

  75. [76]

    Jiang, M

    H. Jiang, M. Alloqulov, Q. Wu, S. Shaymatov, and T. Zhu, Phys. Dark Universe46, 101627 (2024)

    2024

  76. [77]

    Z.-L. Wei, J. Zhang, Y. Xie, and P.-L. Yin, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 698 (2025)

    2025

  77. [78]

    Alloqulov, S

    M. Alloqulov, S. Shaymatov, B. Ahmedov, and T. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 117 (2026)

    2026

  78. [79]

    Sharipov, T

    J. Sharipov, T. Xamidov, Q. Wu, S. Shaymatov, and T. Zhu, (2025), arXiv:2511.10043 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [80]

    Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  80. [81]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.