Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 164 cited by

DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-13 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DELPHES 3 delivers a modular framework for fast simulation of generic collider experiments with added particle-flow and pile-up features.

desk verdict DELPHES 3 updates the fast simulation package with a modular design, particle-flow reconstruction, and pile-up handling, which should help phenomenologists working on LHC analyses. read the letter →

arxiv 1307.6346 v3 pith:3FD6ER6T submitted 2013-07-24 hep-ex hep-ph

J. de Favereau , C. Delaere , P. Demin , A. Giammanco , V. Lemaître , A. Mertens , M. Selvaggi This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exhep-ph
keywords DELPHESfastsimulationcolliderdetectorparticleflowpile-upphenomenologicalstudiesmodularframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces version 3 of DELPHES, a tool for quickly simulating the response of multipurpose detectors in collider experiments for phenomenological studies. It models basic detector components like tracking in a magnetic field, calorimeters, and muon systems to produce reconstructed objects such as jets, electrons, and missing energy. The modular design gives users flexibility to arrange the simulation sequence and incorporates new elements like particle-flow reconstruction and pile-up simulation with mitigation methods. This approach targets fast studies rather than precise detector optimization and works for both hadron and lepton colliders.

What carries the argument

The modular framework that enables flexible design of the simulation and reconstruction sequence by composing independent modules for detector response modeling and object reconstruction.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of key distributions, such as the transverse momentum resolution of reconstructed jets or the efficiency for missing energy reconstruction, between DELPHES and a full Geant4-based simulation for an identical detector setup and input events.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

DELPHES 3 is presented as a modular fast-simulation framework that models the response of a generic multipurpose detector through track propagation in a magnetic field, electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters, and a muon identification system. From this simulated response, it reconstructs physics objects including tracks, calorimeter deposits, isolated electrons, jets, taus, and missing energy. The modular structure allows custom configuration of the simulation and reconstruction sequence, and the update adds support for particle-flow reconstruction and pile-up simulation and mitigation.

Load-bearing premise

The approximations in the simplified detector response models are accurate enough to support reliable phenomenological conclusions from the simulated data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Greater flexibility allows users to tailor the simulation to specific detector designs or analysis needs.
  • Particle-flow reconstruction can be included, matching techniques used in early LHC data analysis.
  • Pile-up simulation and mitigation prepare the tool for high-luminosity LHC conditions.
  • The framework can be adapted for electron-positron collider experiments despite its hadron collider focus.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such a tool could accelerate the exploration of new physics models by allowing rapid generation of pseudo-data for many parameter points.
  • Modularity might enable future extensions with machine learning emulators for even faster approximations.
  • By focusing on speed over precision, it highlights the trade-off between computational efficiency and accuracy in large-scale collider phenomenology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents DELPHES 3.0, a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment. It describes simulation of track propagation in a magnetic field, electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters, and muon identification, followed by reconstruction of physics objects including tracks, calorimeter deposits, isolated electrons, jets, taus, and missing transverse energy. The paper highlights a new modular architecture for flexibility in the simulation and reconstruction sequence, plus new capabilities for particle-flow reconstruction and pile-up simulation and mitigation. The framework is positioned for phenomenological studies rather than precision detector design.

Significance. If the modular implementation and new features perform as described, DELPHES 3 will be a valuable community tool for rapid phenomenological studies at hadron colliders, particularly by incorporating particle-flow and pile-up handling that match current LHC needs. The explicit scope limitation to fast approximations (rather than full Geant4-level accuracy) is clearly stated and appropriate for the intended use case.

major comments (2)
  1. [New features] The description of the modular architecture (new features section) asserts greater flexibility without providing concrete code-level examples, configuration snippets, or timing benchmarks that would allow readers to verify the claimed improvement over DELPHES 2.
  2. [Pile-up and particle-flow sections] No quantitative validation (efficiency curves, resolution plots, or direct comparison to full simulation) is supplied for the particle-flow reconstruction or pile-up mitigation modules, which are presented as central new capabilities; this weakens the ability to assess whether the speed-accuracy trade-off remains acceptable for LHC phenomenology.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a single sentence summarizing typical CPU time per event and memory footprint on standard hardware.
  2. Ensure consistent use of terminology (e.g., “missing energy” vs. “missing transverse energy”) throughout the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [New features] The description of the modular architecture (new features section) asserts greater flexibility without providing concrete code-level examples, configuration snippets, or timing benchmarks that would allow readers to verify the claimed improvement over DELPHES 2.

    Authors: We agree that concrete illustrations would strengthen the presentation of the new modular design. In the revised manuscript we will insert short configuration snippets showing how the simulation and reconstruction sequence can be reconfigured, together with a compact timing table comparing representative run times and memory usage between DELPHES 2 and DELPHES 3 on the same benchmark events. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Pile-up and particle-flow sections] No quantitative validation (efficiency curves, resolution plots, or direct comparison to full simulation) is supplied for the particle-flow reconstruction or pile-up mitigation modules, which are presented as central new capabilities; this weakens the ability to assess whether the speed-accuracy trade-off remains acceptable for LHC phenomenology.

    Authors: The manuscript is a framework description whose stated scope is fast phenomenological studies rather than precision detector performance. Detailed efficiency and resolution comparisons against full Geant4 simulations are therefore outside the intended remit and are normally reported in dedicated performance notes. We will nevertheless revise the relevant sections to add explicit references to existing LHC analyses that have used and validated the particle-flow and pile-up modules of DELPHES 3, and we will include a short qualitative statement on the expected speed-accuracy trade-off. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a software framework description whose central claims concern the successful implementation of a modular architecture, particle-flow reconstruction, and pile-up handling. No mathematical derivation chain, parameter fitting, or first-principles predictions exist that could reduce to self-definition or fitted inputs. Assertions are limited to statements of engineering capabilities and explicit scope limitations (phenomenological studies only), with no load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work consists of software implementation of standard detector modeling techniques.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3FD6ER6T

@misc{pith202613076346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3FD6ER6T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1307.6346}
}
read the original abstract

The version 3.0 of the DELPHES fast-simulation is presented. The goal of DELPHES is to allow the simulation of a multipurpose detector for phenomenological studies. The simulation includes a track propagation system embedded in a magnetic field, electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters, and a muon identification system. Physics objects that can be used for data analysis are then reconstructed from the simulated detector response. These include tracks and calorimeter deposits and high level objects such as isolated electrons, jets, taus, and missing energy. The new modular approach allows for greater flexibility in the design of the simulation and reconstruction sequence. New features such as the particle-flow reconstruction approach, crucial in the first years of the LHC, and pile-up simulation and mitigation, which is needed for the simulation of the LHC detectors in the near future, have also been implemented. The DELPHES framework is not meant to be used for advanced detector studies, for which more accurate tools are needed. Although some aspects of DELPHES are hadron collider specific, it is flexible enough to be adapted to the needs of electron-positron collider experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Showing 60 of 164 Pith papers that cite this

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2,080 citations worldwide. See all 164 Pith citations

  1. Revised exclusion limits on doubly charged Higgs bosons from a reanalysis of the ATLAS multi-lepton search at $\sqrt{s} = 13$,TeV

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The four-lepton signal efficiencies in ATLAS's doubly charged Higgs search exceed a strict analytical ceiling, so the corrected expected mass limits are roughly 100 GeV weaker.

  2. Benchmarking Machine Learning Architectures for ttH Multilepton Signal Sensitivity

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A controlled benchmark of six ML classifiers on a new simulated ttH multilepton dataset finds symmetry-constrained graph models (Particle Transformer, LorentzNet) and azimuthal RoPE encoding outperform tabular baselines.

  3. Reweighting Adversarial Networks for Unbinned Unfolding

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    RANs generalize moment unfolding to full phase-space unbinned unfolding via detector-level Wasserstein critics without requiring support overlap or multiple iterations.

  4. Particle-Lund Multimodality in Jet Taggers

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    PLuM multimodal transformer improves top and H->bb jet tagging by jointly processing particle constituents and Lund plane splittings, yielding 25% higher background rejection at 25% di-Higgs efficiency.

  5. Higgs Physics with the XFEL Compton $\boldsymbol{\gamma\gamma}$ Collider Concept at $\boldsymbol{\sqrt{s}=125}$ GeV

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    An XFEL Compton gamma-gamma collider at 125 GeV with a set transformer deep learning classifier on particle-flow point clouds can achieve high-precision Higgs measurements across hadronic, semi-leptonic, and leptonic ...

  6. Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Collider-Bench is a new benchmark showing that current LLM agents cannot reliably reproduce LHC analyses at the level of a physicist-in-the-loop.

  7. Many Wrongs Make a Right: Leveraging Biased Simulations Towards Unbiased Parameter Inference

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Template-Adapted Mixture Model uses many biased simulations for data-driven estimates of signal and background distributions, yielding unbiased signal fraction estimates with well-calibrated uncertainties.

  8. Multi-step Strong First-Order Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Inverted Type-I 2HDM: Parameter Space, Gravitational Waves, and Collider Phenomenology

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In the inverted Type-I 2HDM, one-step and two-step strong first-order electroweak phase transitions live in largely separate parameter regions, and LISA-detectable gravitational wave signals come predominantly from th...

  9. Stay Positive: Neural Refinement of Sample Weights

    hep-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Neural refinement of Monte Carlo sample weights via phase-space scaling and a new resampling protocol that maintains averages and uncertainties.

  10. $H \to ZZ$ as a double-slit experiment

    hep-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Comparing angular correlations between the eeμμ and 4e/4μ channels of H→ZZ→4ℓ offers a new quantum-interference test and a first identical-particle probe for muons at the HL-LHC.

  11. New physics and tau $g-2$ using LHC heavy ion collisions

    hep-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Using ultraperipheral lead-lead collisions, a lepton-plus-tracks analysis could constrain the tau anomalous magnetic moment to -0.0080 < a_tau < 0.0046 at 68% CL, three times better than DELPHI.

  12. Toward a Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass with Natural-Width Precision at FCC-ee

    hep-ex 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fast-simulation study projects a 4.0 MeV Higgs boson mass measurement at FCC-ee using the leptonic ZH recoil-mass technique, dominated by statistical uncertainty.

  13. Multi-Channel Di-Higgs Production in the scNMSSM: From Exotic 8b to Boosted 8tau Signatures at the HL-LHC

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulations of four scNMSSM benchmark points suggest an exotic 8b di-Higgs channel may be visible at the HL-LHC, while a boosted 8tau channel falls outside existing search strategies.

  14. TauPolaris: reconstructing tau lepton polarimetric vectors with conditional normalizing flows

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A conditional normalizing flow reconstructs tau polarimetric vectors from simulated LHC events, improving spin-observable resolution by about 40% over a regression baseline and projecting >4.3 sigma entanglement separ...

  15. High energy probes of Higgs self-coupling via $W$ boson fusion at future lepton colliders

    hep-ph 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A GNN-based projection for WBF di-Higgs at 3 TeV CLIC claims kappa_lambda in [0.76,1.31] and Z about 20, but the reported yields and efficiencies give only about 9.

  16. Direct constraints on the agnostic $\nu$SMEFT from heavy-neutrino searches at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A recast of CMS same-sign-dimuon data places the first direct bounds on the agnostic νSMEFT, excluding couplings below ~5.8×10⁻⁷ GeV⁻² at m_N≈1.5 TeV.

  17. Defining a Minimum Resolution for Unbinned Analyses

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Minimum Resolution Likelihood method defines a fiducial signal region to convert ML-induced systematic effects into statistical uncertainties for unbiased signal strength estimation in collider analyses.

  18. Parnassus: A GPU-enabled, Python-based Package for Fast Particle Detector Simulation and Reconstruction

    hep-ex 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Parnassus releases a unified PyTorch framework offering flow-matching neural and Delphes-style parametric models for CMS, ATLAS, and ALEPH detector simulation that run on GPUs without ROOT.

  19. Lepton number violation at hadron colliders via pseudo-Dirac heavy neutral leptons

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Damped oscillations alleviate LN violation suppression for pseudo-Dirac HNLs, improving collider sensitivities and allowing distinction from the double-Majorana limit.

  20. Radiative Signature of New Scalar Boson Decays in the $m_{\ell \ell \gamma}$ Spectrum at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reanalysis of CMS ttγ data shows a 2.7σ localized excess in m_ℓℓγ at 152 GeV compatible with S → W⁺W⁻γ from a narrow scalar, yielding a ratio σ(S → W⁺W⁻γ)/σ(S → W⁺W⁻) = (2.14 ± 0.77)%.

  21. "Hadron-in-fat-jet'' AI Tagging to Detect Rare Decays Such as $W^{\pm}\to\pi^{\pm}\gamma$

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Proof-of-principle for hadron-in-fat-jet AI tagging that yields an expected 95% CL limit of B(W±→π±γ) < 2.78×10^{-5} at 450 fb^{-1}.

  22. Probing lepton flavor mixing in $W_R$ searches with machine learning at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DNN analysis of pp → WR → ℓNR → ℓℓjj at LHC Run 2 and HL-LHC improves exclusion limits on m_WR and m_NR for unmixed, maximal-mixing, and PMNS-like scenarios over cut-based methods and probes the |Ve1|–|Vμ1| plane.

  23. Probing Doubly Charged Higgs Bosons with Three-Body Associated Production at Future $e^+e^-$ Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Doubly charged Higgs bosons in the type-II seesaw 2HDM can be produced via 2-to-3 associated channels at e+e- colliders with cross sections up to ~10^2 fb and good 4-lepton discovery sensitivity.

  24. Look everywhere effects in anomaly detection

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Weakly supervised anomaly detectors that train and test on the same data produce badly miscalibrated p-values; independent test sets are calibrated but insensitive, while k-fold cross-validation is a workable middle ground.

  25. Enhancing next token prediction based pre-training for jet foundation models

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using continuous particle features as input and combining next-token with masked-token pre-training markedly improves classification accuracy of the OmniJet jet foundation model without visibly hurting its generative quality.

  26. MiniFool -- Physics-Constraint-Aware Minimizer-Based Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MiniFool generates uncertainty-aware adversarial perturbations and uses the attack strength needed to flip a classification as a measure of how robust the network's decision is.

  27. The Muonic Portal to Vector Dark Matter:connecting precision muon physics, cosmology, and colliders

    hep-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new model with SU(2)_D symmetry and vector-like muons mediates vector dark matter, simultaneously addressing relic abundance and muon g-2 while identifying an off-resonance suppression mechanism for light DM and der...

  28. Flavor constraints from $pp\to Vh$ and $pp\to VW$ at the LHC

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LHC data on pp→Vh and pp→VW yield general-flavor SMEFT constraints that will become competitive with flavor tests of the Cabibbo-angle anomaly at the HL-LHC.

  29. Forecasting Generative Amplification

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A KS-test-based differential method and a Bayesian averaging method estimate generative amplification without holdout datasets and find amplification in selected LHC phase-space regions.

  30. Neural Posterior Unfolding

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A normalizing-flow-based Bayesian unfolding method (NPU) plus a modern Python implementation of Fully Bayesian Unfolding (FBU) are introduced and validated on Gaussian and simulated LHC jet data.

  31. Analysis-ready Generative Unfolding

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generative unfolding is extended to handle backgrounds, acceptance, and efficiency effects in an unbinned, iterative pipeline, demonstrated at percent-level accuracy on Gaussian and Z+jets simulations.

  32. Higgs Signal Strength Estimation with Machine Learning under Systematic Uncertainties

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAGE, a dual-branch GNN trained under nuisance fluctuations, estimates the Higgs signal strength with near-nominal coverage (0.662-0.683) but wider intervals than the top FAIR-HUC leaderboard methods.

  33. Novel probes for electron-muon flavor violation from exotic Higgs decays

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Novel multilepton signatures from Higgs decays to a light pseudoscalar decaying to e-mu pairs in type-III 2HDM can set stronger limits on LFV couplings than low-energy experiments.

  34. Hits to Higgs: Hit-Level Higgs Classification from Raw LHC Detector Data Using Higgsformer

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Higgsformer achieves AUC 0.855 on t tbar H vs t tbar classification from raw hits, matching a Delphes-based Particle Transformer at ~40% b-tagging efficiency.

  35. Gravitational Waves from Dark Gauge Sectors

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dark SU(2) gauge sector that explains vector dark matter can produce LISA-detectable gravitational waves from a first-order phase transition, with a companion six-top signature at the HL-LHC.

  36. Fresh look at the LHC limits on vector leptoquarks

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Updated LHC limits on vector leptoquark masses and couplings from a combined recast of pair, single, indirect, and interference production in dimuon-dijet data.

  37. Simulation-Prior Independent Neural Unfolding Procedure

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SPINUP is a neural-unfolding method that fits a parton-level generative model directly to detector-level data through a learned forward simulator, aiming to remove the simulation-prior bias.

  38. Tracing Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions through Charged Lepton Collisions

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Future lepton colliders could probe neutrino-electron non-standard interactions down to coupling strengths of about 0.02% to 0.7%, depending on the machine.

  39. $\mathcal{CP}$-Analyses with Symbolic Regression

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Symbolic regression produces analytic, detector-level CP-odd observables for WBF Higgs production and an analytic reconstruction of the Collins-Soper angle in ttH that are competitive with black-box ML and classical methods.

  40. Searching for Di-Higgs Signatures of Light Charged Scalars

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A roughly 130 GeV charged Higgs explaining the ATLAS t to bH+ excess and B-meson anomalies can be constrained, and perhaps discovered, by recasting SM di-Higgs 4b searches at the LHC.

  41. Investigation of the performance of a GNN-based b-jet tagging method in heavy-ion collisions

    physics.data-an 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A GNN-based b-jet tagger adapted from ATLAS's GN1 retains good performance on simulated Pb-Pb background when retrained per centrality, despite degradation when applied out-of-the-box.

  42. Proposed measurement of longitudinally polarised vector bosons in $WH$ and $ZH$ production at Hadron colliders

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulation-based projections show longitudinally polarised W bosons in WH production could be measured at 5-sigma significance with 300 fb^-1 at the LHC.

  43. Closing in on singly charged scalars

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For a benchmark singly charged scalar that decays to leptons plus invisible particles, LHC data still allow masses above about 185 GeV and in a window near 80-125 GeV, and a boosted-decision-tree search could probe th...

  44. Searching for charged Higgs bosons via $e^+ e^- \to H^\pm W^\mp S$ at the ILC

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A detector-level Monte Carlo study shows that e+e- -> H± W∓ S in the type-X 2HDM could be discovered at the ILC with 500 GeV and 500 fb^-1.

  45. Jet Substructure Probe on Scalar Leptoquark Models via Top Polarization

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulation study projects up to 5.4 sigma discovery significance for scalar leptoquarks at the HL-LHC and up to 3.2 sigma separation between the S3 and R2 models using a BDT score.

  46. Tagging fully hadronic exotic decays of the vectorlike $\mathbf{B}$ quark using a graph neural network

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A GNN-based search could give the HL-LHC an exclusion reach near 2.4 TeV for vectorlike B quarks decaying fully hadronically through b plus a singlet scalar, with performance comparable to semileptonic searches.

  47. Probing light neutralinos from pair-produced sleptons with displaced vertices at the high-luminosity LHC

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A displaced-vertex search for slepton pair production at the HL-LHC can probe RPV coupling lambda-prime-111 down to about 1e-7 and neutralino masses up to roughly 1 TeV, far beyond single-slepton production.

  48. Emerging Photon Jets in the Hadronic Calorimeter: A Novel Signature of Neutral Long-Lived Particles at the LHC

    hep-ph 2025-04 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 'emerging photon jet' signature in the hadronic calorimeter could make neutral long-lived particles decaying to photons visible at the HL-LHC.

  49. Reconstruction of angular correlations in the associated top quark and the dark matter mediator production

    hep-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A normalizing-flow neural network reconstructs the momenta of the neutrino and dark mediator in single top quark production and reproduces a top-quark spin-correlation variable more accurately than a multilayer perceptron.

  50. Bring the noise: exact inference from noisy simulations in collider physics

    hep-ph 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces pseudo-marginal MCMC with unbiased Poisson likelihood estimator for exact inference despite noisy collider Monte Carlo simulations.

  51. How to Unfold Top Decays

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A conditional flow-matching network with batch-level conditioning and multi-mass training unfolds top-decay kinematics and extracts the top mass with reduced model bias.

  52. A Comprehensive Search for Leptoquarks Decaying into Top-$\tau$ Final States at the Future LHC

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulated ML-based search strategy for third-generation scalar leptoquarks decaying to top-tau pairs could extend the LHC exclusion reach to about 1.77 TeV at 500 fb^-1.

  53. Advancing Higgsino Searches by Integrating ML for Boosted Object Tagging and Event Selection

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A GNN-plus-BDT analysis of fat jets is projected to extend GGM higgsino exclusion reach to 1470 GeV at 14 TeV with 200 fb-1, up from roughly 1025 GeV in current CMS searches.

  54. Automatizing the search for mass resonances using BumpNet

    physics.data-an 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    One trained convolutional network predicts bump significance across mass histograms of different sizes and backgrounds, approaching the accuracy of the ideal likelihood-ratio test.

  55. Measuring Quantum Discord at the LHC

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors derive closed-form formulas for quantum discord in the ttbar system and predict it can be measured at the LHC with sub-percent precision using the kinematic method.

  56. Simulations of the Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with a Crossing-Width Term

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-step diagonalization plus a dummy-particle trick lets standard event generators simulate GeV-scale sterile neutrino oscillations with crossing-width terms, and a QFT derivation gives displaced-vertex distances.

  57. On the EFT validity for Drell-Yan tails at the LHC

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For t-channel mediators such as the U1 leptoquark, Drell-Yan EFT bounds are accurate at the 10% level for masses above about 1.5 TeV when the series is truncated at amplitude level, while s-channel mediators need E mu...

  58. How to Falsify String Theory at a Collider

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Detection of an isolated SU(2)_L n-plet with n≥5 would falsify known string constructions; current LHC limits exclude such states up to 400-735 GeV depending on n.

  59. Toponium: the smallest bound state and simplest hadron in quantum mechanics

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using the b-quark production ratio at sqrt(s) near 341 GeV, a simulated CEPC experiment could discover toponium at over 5 sigma and measure the top 1S mass to about 33 MeV.

  60. Pretrained Event Classification Model for High Energy Physics Analysis

    hep-ph 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pretrained GNN on 120M simulated LHC events improves downstream event-classification accuracy when training data are scarce, with benefits shrinking as data grow.

See all 164 Pith citations

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 164 Pith papers (see all)

  1. [1]

    Allison, K

    J. Allison, K. Amako, J. Apostolakis, H. Araujo, P. A. Dubois, M. Asai, G. Barrand and R. Capra et al.,Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.53, 270 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Hamilton, E

    S. Hamilton, E. Kneringer, W. Lukas, E. Ritsch, A. Salzburger, K. Sliwa, S. Todorova and J. Wetter et al.,The ATLAS Fast Track Simulation Project, ATL-SOFT-PROC-2011-038

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Lukas [ATLAS Collaboration],Fast Simulation for ATLAS: Atlfast-II and ISF, J

    W. Lukas [ATLAS Collaboration],Fast Simulation for ATLAS: Atlfast-II and ISF, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 396, 022031 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Rahmat, R

    R. Rahmat, R. Kroeger and A. Giammanco,The fast simulation of the CMS experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.396, 062016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Abdullinet al.[CMS Collaboration],The fast simulation of the CMS detector at LHC, J

    S. Abdullinet al.[CMS Collaboration],The fast simulation of the CMS detector at LHC, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.331, 032049 (2011)

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    [CMS Collaboration],Comparison of the Fast Simulation of CMS with the first LHC data, CMS-DP-2010-039

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    S. Ovyn, X. Rouby and V. Lemaitre,DELPHES, a framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, arXiv:0903.2225 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    Buskulicet al.[ALEPH Collaboration],Performance of the ALEPH detector at LEP, Nucl

    D. Buskulicet al.[ALEPH Collaboration],Performance of the ALEPH detector at LEP, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A360, 481 (1995)

    work page 1995

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    CMS Collaboration,Particle-Flow Event Reconstruction in CMS and Performance for Jets, Taus, and MET, CMS-PAS-PFT-09-001

  2. [10]

    Beringeret al.[Particle Data Group Collaboration],Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys

    J. Beringeret al.[Particle Data Group Collaboration],Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D86, 010001 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1896 (2012) [arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The Catchment Area of Jets, JHEP 0804, 005 (2008) [arXiv:0802.1188 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Cacciari and G

    M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam,Pileup subtraction using jet areas, Phys. Lett. B659, 119 (2008) [arXiv:0707.1378 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [14]

    G. L. Bayatianet al.[CMS Collaboration],CMS physics: Technical design report CERN-LHCC-2006-001

    2006

  7. [16]

    Alwall, M

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer,MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond, JHEP 1106, 128 (2011) [arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph]]

    2011

  8. [17]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands,PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 0605, 026 (2006) [hep-ph/0603175]

    2006

  9. [18]

    Catani, F

    S. Catani, F. Krauss, R. Kuhn and B. R. Webber,QCD matrix elements + parton showers, JHEP 0111, 063 (2001) [hep-ph/0109231]

    2001

  10. [19]

    CMS Collaboration,Performance of CMS muon reconstruction inpp collision events at√s = 7 TeV, JINST 7, P10002 (2012) [arXiv:1206.4071 [physics.ins-det]]

    2012

  11. [20]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment - Detector, Trigger and Physics, arXiv:0901.0512 [hep-ex]

  12. [21]

    CMS Collaboration,Electron performance with 19.6 fb−1 of data collected at√s = 8 TeV with the CMS detector, CMS-DP-2013-003

    2013

  13. [22]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The Anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm,’ JHEP 0804, 063 (2008) [arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  14. [23]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Jet energy resolution in proton-proton collisions at√s = 7 TeV recorded in 2010 with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2306 (2013) [arXiv:1210.6210 [hep-ex]]

    2010

  15. [24]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of Missing Transverse Momentum Reconstruction in ATLAS with 2011 Proton-Proton Collisions atsqrts = 7 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2012-101

    2011

  16. [25]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector Track and Vertex Reconstruction in the High Pile-Up LHC Environment, ATLAS-CONF-2012-042

    2012

  17. [26]

    CMS Collaboration,Measurement of the top-quark mass int¯t events with lepton+jets final states in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV, JHEP 1212, 105 (2012) [arXiv:1209.2319 [hep-ex]]

    2012

  18. [27]

    https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/delphes/wiki/WorkBook/DelphesAnalysis

  19. [28]

    CMS Collaboration,b-Jet Identification in the CMS Experiment, CMS-PAS-BTV-11-004

  20. [29]

    Sjostrand, S

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands,A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008) [arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Antcheva et al.,A C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization, Comput

    I. Antcheva et al.,A C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization, Comput. Phys. Commun.180, 2499 (2009)

    2009

  22. [31]

    https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/ExRootAnalysis

  23. [32]

    S. V. Chekanov,Next generation input-output data format for HEP using Google’s protocol buffers, arXiv:1306.6675 [cs.CE]

  24. [33]

    Dobbs and J

    M. Dobbs and J. B. Hansen,The HepMC C++ Monte Carlo event record for High Energy Physics Comput. Phys. Commun.134, 41 (2001)

    2001

  25. [34]

    Garren, P

    L. Garren, P. Lebrun,StdHep User Manual, http://cepa.fnal.gov/psm/stdhep/

  26. [35]

    Alwall, A

    J. Alwall, A. Ballestrero, P. Bartalini, S. Belov, E. Boos, A. Buckley, J. M. Butterworth and L. Dudko et al.,A Standard format for Les Houches event files, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 300 [hep-ph/0609017]

    2007 arXiv

  27. [36]

    https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/delphes – 25 –

  28. [37]

    Giammanco,The CMS Fast Simulation, Submitted to Journal of Physics: Conference Series – 26 –

    A. Giammanco,The CMS Fast Simulation, Submitted to Journal of Physics: Conference Series – 26 –

Pith tools

Reviewed May 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.