pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.07920 · v2 · pith:5QX4PW66new · submitted 2025-02-11 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Vector mesons from a holographic QCD model in f(R)-dilaton gravity

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords holographic QCDvector mesonsf(R) gravityStarobinsky modelrho mesonsAdS5 spacetimeSturm-Liouville problemdecay constants
0
0 comments X

The pith

A small Starobinsky correction in f(R)-dilaton gravity reproduces the rho meson masses seen in experiment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a holographic dual for vector mesons by replacing the Einstein-Hilbert term in five-dimensional dilaton gravity with the Starobinsky function f(R) equals R plus alpha R squared. It writes the modified field equations in AdS5, reduces the vector field problem to a Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue equation, and extracts the meson spectrum and decay constants. For the second and third rho states the calculated masses lie close to measured values once alpha is set to 10 to the minus eight; the same equations recover earlier Einstein-dilaton results when alpha vanishes.

Core claim

In the Starobinsky-dilaton gravity model the vector-meson spectrum obtained from the Sturm-Liouville problem yields m_rho squared and m_rho cubed in agreement with experimental data when the coefficient alpha equals 10 to the minus eight, while the construction reduces exactly to the pure dilaton case at alpha equals zero.

What carries the argument

The Starobinsky term f(R) equals R plus alpha R squared inserted into the bulk gravity action, which alters the five-dimensional metric and permits the holographic dictionary to extract meson masses as eigenvalues of the resulting Sturm-Liouville operator.

If this is right

  • The meson spectrum deviates only mildly from the Einstein-dilaton case yet improves the fit to data.
  • Decay constants of the vector mesons can be computed within the same modified-gravity setup.
  • The framework recovers all prior holographic QCD results in the limit alpha equals zero.
  • The approach extends holographic models to a one-parameter family of higher-curvature bulk theories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Small f(R) corrections may systematically refine holographic predictions for other light hadrons without spoiling the AdS5 asymptotics.
  • The same bulk modification could be tested on axial-vector or scalar meson spectra to check consistency across channels.
  • If the required alpha remains of order 10 to the minus eight, the correction is negligible for most gravitational observables but visible in the dual QCD spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The standard holographic dictionary and the Sturm-Liouville reduction remain valid once the bulk action is changed from Einstein-Hilbert to the Starobinsky f(R) form.

What would settle it

A direct numerical solution of the Sturm-Liouville equation at alpha equals 10 to the minus eight that produces rho masses differing from experiment by more than a few percent would falsify the reported agreement.

read the original abstract

In this paper we investigate the spectrum and decay constants of vector mesons based on $f(R)$-dilaton gravity. We focus particularly on the well-known Starobinsky model, given by the function $f(R)= R+ \alpha R^2$ in the metric formalism, and we examine the deviations from the pure Einstein-dilaton case. We thus provide the field equations for Starobinsky-dilaton gravity in $\rm AdS_{5}$ spacetime and calculate the spectral decomposition of the vector mesons by means of a Sturm-Liouville problem. Remarkably, for the rho mesons $m_{\rho^2}$ and $m_{\rho^3}$, our results are in good agreement with the experimental data when $\alpha= 10^{-8}$. Our work also generalizes previous studies and recovers standard results when $\alpha= 0$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper investigates vector meson spectra and decay constants in a holographic QCD setup based on f(R)-dilaton gravity in AdS5, focusing on the Starobinsky model f(R)=R+αR². It supplies the modified Einstein-dilaton field equations, formulates the vector meson problem as a Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue equation, and reports that the masses m_ρ² and m_ρ³ agree with experimental data for the tuned value α=10^{-8}, while recovering the standard Einstein-dilaton results at α=0.

Significance. If the central technical assumption holds, the work supplies a concrete generalization of AdS/QCD models that incorporates higher-curvature corrections and demonstrates that small deviations from Einstein gravity can be adjusted to improve phenomenological fits to the rho spectrum. The recovery of the α=0 limit provides a useful consistency check. However, the physical motivation for introducing the Starobinsky term specifically in the holographic QCD context and the extreme smallness of the required α remain open questions that limit the broader impact.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section deriving the vector meson Sturm-Liouville problem and spectral results] The central claim that m_ρ² and m_ρ³ match experiment at α=10^{-8} rests on applying the standard holographic dictionary and Sturm-Liouville formulation to the vector field in the Starobinsky-dilaton background. The manuscript states that it provides the modified Einstein-dilaton equations but does not explicitly derive or justify the vector equation of motion (or effective potential) at order α. Because the f(R) term can in principle induce mixing or corrections through the background or non-minimal couplings, and because α is chosen precisely to produce the reported numerical agreement, any O(α) shift in the eigenvalues would invalidate the match. This assumption is load-bearing and requires explicit verification in the section presenting the vector spectral decomposition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and agree that additional clarification is warranted.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section deriving the vector meson Sturm-Liouville problem and spectral results] The central claim that m_ρ² and m_ρ³ match experiment at α=10^{-8} rests on applying the standard holographic dictionary and Sturm-Liouville formulation to the vector field in the Starobinsky-dilaton background. The manuscript states that it provides the modified Einstein-dilaton equations but does not explicitly derive or justify the vector equation of motion (or effective potential) at order α. Because the f(R) term can in principle induce mixing or corrections through the background or non-minimal couplings, and because α is chosen precisely to produce the reported numerical agreement, any O(α) shift in the eigenvalues would invalidate the match. This assumption is load-bearing and requires explicit verification in the section presenting the vector spectral decomposition.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the vector equation of motion is needed for rigor. The vector field is introduced via the standard Maxwell term minimally coupled to the metric (no non-minimal couplings to the f(R) sector or dilaton are added). Its equation of motion is therefore the standard one on the curved background, with all α dependence entering through the modified metric and dilaton profiles solved from the provided Einstein-dilaton equations. No additional mixing terms appear at linear order in the vector field. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated derivation of the vector EOM and the resulting Sturm-Liouville problem (including the explicit O(α) corrections to the effective potential) immediately before the numerical results, confirming that the reported spectra remain valid. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Rho meson mass agreement obtained by tuning α=10^{-8} to fit experimental data

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Remarkably, for the rho mesons m_ρ² and m_ρ³, our results are in good agreement with the experimental data when α= 10^{-8}."

    The free parameter α is tuned to the value that makes the computed eigenvalues match the experimental rho masses; the reported agreement is therefore produced by construction once that value is inserted, rather than emerging as a parameter-free prediction of the f(R)-dilaton setup.

full rationale

The paper derives modified Einstein-dilaton equations in AdS5 for the Starobinsky model and applies the standard Sturm-Liouville spectral decomposition to obtain vector meson masses. This chain is independent of the final numerical comparison. However, the headline result (agreement for m_ρ² and m_ρ³) is achieved only after selecting the specific value α=10^{-8} that produces the match; the agreement is therefore a fitted outcome rather than an independent prediction. No self-citation load-bearing, self-definitional steps, or ansatz smuggling are present in the quoted material. The holographic dictionary validity is an assumption but does not reduce the derivation to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model introduces one fitted parameter α whose value is chosen to match data; the holographic correspondence itself is taken as a domain assumption without new justification in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • α = 10^{-8}
    The coefficient of the R² term is set to 10^{-8} to obtain agreement with experimental rho masses.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The holographic dictionary maps bulk vector fields in f(R)-dilaton AdS5 to boundary vector mesons.
    Standard assumption invoked to interpret the Sturm-Liouville eigenvalues as meson masses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5686 in / 1259 out tokens · 25102 ms · 2026-05-23T03:41:11.358363+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200

  2. [2]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

  3. [3]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105–114, arXiv:hep-th/9802109

  4. [4]

    Ammon and J

    M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger, Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4, 2015

  5. [5]

    Linear Confinement and AdS/QCD

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015005, arXiv:hep-ph/0602229

  6. [6]

    Gravitational Form Factors in the Axial Sector from an AdS/QCD Model

    Z. Abidin and C. E. Carlson, “Gravitational Form Factors in the Axial Sector from an AdS/QCD Model,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 115021, arXiv:0804.0214 [hep-ph]

  7. [7]

    Gravitational Form Factors of Vector Mesons in an AdS/QCD Model

    Z. Abidin and C. E. Carlson, “Gravitational form factors of vector mesons in an AdS/QCD model,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 095007, arXiv:0801.3839 [hep-ph]

  8. [8]

    Strange mesons and kaon-to-pion transition form factors from holography

    Z. Abidin and C. E. Carlson, “Strange hadrons and kaon-to-pion transition form factors from holography,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 115010, arXiv:0908.2452 [hep-ph]

  9. [9]

    Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces

    L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, “Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces,” Nucl. Phys. B 721 (2005) 79–97, arXiv:hep-ph/0501218

  10. [10]

    Structure of Vector Mesons in Holographic Model with Linear Confinement

    H. R. Grigoryan and A. V. Radyushkin, “Structure of vector mesons in holographic model with linear confinement,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095007, arXiv:0706.1543 [hep-ph]

  11. [11]

    Form Factors and Wave Functions of Vector Mesons in Holographic QCD

    H. R. Grigoryan and A. V. Radyushkin, “Form Factors and Wave Functions of Vector Mesons in Holographic QCD,” Phys. Lett. B 650 (2007) 421–427, arXiv:hep-ph/0703069

  12. [12]

    Pion Form Factor in Chiral Limit of Hard-Wall AdS/QCD Model

    H. R. Grigoryan and A. V. Radyushkin, “Pion form-factor in chiral limit of hard-wall AdS/QCD model,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 115007, arXiv:0709.0500 [hep-ph]

  13. [13]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I

    U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,” JHEP 02 (2008) 032, arXiv:0707.1324 [hep-th]

  14. [14]

    Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, and F. Nitti, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,” JHEP 02 (2008) 019, arXiv:0707.1349 [hep-th]

  15. [15]

    Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, and F. Nitti, “Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity,” JHEP 05 (2009) 033, arXiv:0812.0792 [hep-th] . – 12 –

  16. [16]

    Effective holographic models for QCD: glueball spectrum and trace anomaly,

    A. Ballon-Bayona, H. Boschi-Filho, L. A. H. Mamani, A. S. Miranda, and V. T. Zanchin, “Effective holographic models for QCD: glueball spectrum and trace anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 4, (2018) 046001

  17. [17]

    Dynamical holographic QCD model for spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and confinement,

    A. Ballon-Bayona, T. Frederico, L. A. H. Mamani, and W. de Paula, “Dynamical holographic QCD model for spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and confinement,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 10, (2023) 106016, arXiv:2308.07503 [hep-ph]

  18. [18]

    Effective holographic models for QCD: Thermodynamics and viscosity coefficients,

    A. Ballon-Bayona, L. A. H. Mamani, A. S. Miranda, and V. T. Zanchin, “Effective holographic models for QCD: Thermodynamics and viscosity coefficients,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 4, (2021) 046013, arXiv:2103.14188 [hep-th]

  19. [19]

    Thermal Transport and Drag Force in Improved Holographic QCD

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, G. Michalogiorgakis, and F. Nitti, “Thermal Transport and Drag Force in Improved Holographic QCD,” JHEP 12 (2009) 056, arXiv:0906.1890 [hep-ph]

  20. [20]

    On Holographic Entanglement Entropy and Higher Curvature Gravity

    L.-Y. Hung, R. C. Myers, and M. Smolkin, “On Holographic Entanglement Entropy and Higher Curvature Gravity,” JHEP 04 (2011) 025, arXiv:1101.5813 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Viscosity Bound Violation in Higher Derivative Gravity

    M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker, and S. Yaida, “Viscosity Bound Violation in Higher Derivative Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 126006, arXiv:0712.0805 [hep-th]

  22. [22]

    Anti-de Sitter Black Holes, Thermal Phase Transition and Holography in Higher Curvature Gravity

    Y. M. Cho and I. P. Neupane, “Anti-de Sitter black holes, thermal phase transition and holography in higher curvature gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 024044, arXiv:hep-th/0202140

  23. [23]

    AdS/BCFT correspondence and BTZ black hole thermodynamics within Horndeski gravity,

    F. F. Santos, E. F. Capossoli, and H. Boschi-Filho, “AdS/BCFT correspondence and BTZ black hole thermodynamics within Horndeski gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 6, (2021) 066014, arXiv:2105.03802 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    f(R) theories of gravity,

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, “ f(R) theories of gravity,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 451–497

  25. [25]

    f(R) theories,

    A. D. Felice and S. Tsujikawa, “ f(R) theories,” Living Rev. Relativ. 13 (2010) 3

  26. [26]

    Extended theories of gravity,

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, “Extended theories of gravity,” Phys. Rep. 509 no. 4, (2011) 167 – 321

  27. [27]

    Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: From f(R) theory to lorentz non-invariant models,

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: From f(R) theory to lorentz non-invariant models,” Phys. Rep. 505 no. 2, (2011) 59–144

  28. [28]

    Modified gravity and cosmology,

    T. Clifton et al., “Modified gravity and cosmology,” Phys. Rep. 513 no. 1, (2012) 1–189

  29. [29]

    Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution,

    S. Nojiri, S. Odintsov, and V. Oikonomou, “Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution,” Phys. Rep. 692 (2017) 1–104

  30. [30]

    Unifying inflation with early and late-time dark energy in f(R) gravity,

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. Oikonomou, “Unifying inflation with early and late-time dark energy in f(R) gravity,” Phys. Dark Univ. 29 (2020) 100602

  31. [31]

    Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?

    S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, “Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043528

  32. [32]

    Large scale structure of f(R) gravity,

    Y.-S. Song, W. Hu, and I. Sawicki, “Large scale structure of f(R) gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 044004

  33. [33]

    Background cosmological dynamics in f(R) gravity and observational constraints,

    A. Ali, R. Gannouji, M. Sami, and A. A. Sen, “Background cosmological dynamics in f(R) gravity and observational constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 104029

  34. [34]

    Cosmological constraints on the R2-corrected Appleby–Battye model,

    B. Ribeiro, A. Bernui, and M. Campista, “Cosmological constraints on the R2-corrected Appleby–Battye model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 114. – 13 –

  35. [35]

    A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,” Phys. Lett. B 91 no. 1, (1980) 99 – 102

  36. [36]

    Planck 2018 results - X. constraints on inflation,

    Y. Akrami et al., “Planck 2018 results - X. constraints on inflation,” A&A 641 (2020) A10

  37. [37]

    The realistic models of relativistic stars in f(R) = R + αR2 gravity,

    A. V. Astashenok, S. D. Odintsov, and ´Alvaro de la Cruz-Dombriz, “The realistic models of relativistic stars in f(R) = R + αR2 gravity,” Class. Quantum Grav. 34 no. 20, (2017) 205008

  38. [38]

    Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges,

    G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and A. Wojnar, “Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges,” Phys. Rep. 876 (2020) 1–75

  39. [39]

    Extended gravity description for the GW190814 supermassive neutron star,

    A. Astashenok et al., “Extended gravity description for the GW190814 supermassive neutron star,” Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135910

  40. [40]

    Causal limit of neutron star maximum mass in f(R) gravity in view of GW190814,

    A. Astashenok et al., “Causal limit of neutron star maximum mass in f(R) gravity in view of GW190814,” Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136222

  41. [41]

    Comparison of perturbative and non-perturbative methods in f(R) gravity,

    K. Nobleson, A. Ali, and S. Banik, “Comparison of perturbative and non-perturbative methods in f(R) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 32

  42. [42]

    R2-gravity quark stars from perturbative QCD,

    J. C. Jim´ enezet al., “R2-gravity quark stars from perturbative QCD,” JCAP 2022 no. 07, (2022) 017

  43. [43]

    Charged quark stars in metric f(R) gravity,

    J. M. Z. Pretel et al., “Charged quark stars in metric f(R) gravity,” JCAP 2022 no. 09, (2022) 058

  44. [44]

    Black hole solutions in R2 gravity,

    A. Kehagias, C. Kounnas, D. L¨ ust, and A. Riotto, “Black hole solutions in R2 gravity,” JHEP 2015 no. 05, (2015) 143

  45. [45]

    Thermodynamics of topological black holes in R2 gravity,

    G. Cognola, M. Rinaldi, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini, “Thermodynamics of topological black holes in R2 gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 104004

  46. [46]

    Holographic images of an AdS black hole within the framework of f(R) gravity theory,

    G.-P. Li, K.-J. He, X.-Y. Hu, and Q.-Q. Jiang, “Holographic images of an AdS black hole within the framework of f(R) gravity theory,” Front. Phys. 19 (2024) 54202

  47. [47]

    Nucleons and vector mesons in a confining holographic QCD model,

    A. Ballon-Bayona and A. S. d. S. Junior, “Nucleons and vector mesons in a confining holographic QCD model,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 9, (2024) 094050, arXiv:2402.17950 [hep-ph]

  48. [48]

    QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,

    J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 261602

  49. [49]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, R. L. Workman et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01

  50. [50]

    Form factors of vector and axial-vector mesons in holographic D4-D8 model

    C. A. Ballon Bayona, H. Boschi-Filho, N. R. F. Braga, and M. A. C. Torres, “Form factors of vector and axial-vector mesons in holographic D4-D8 model,” JHEP 01 (2010) 052, arXiv:0911.0023 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Meson Spectroscopy in AdS/CFT with Flavour

    M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R. C. Myers, and D. J. Winters, “Meson spectroscopy in AdS / CFT with flavor,” JHEP 07 (2003) 049, arXiv:hep-th/0304032

  52. [52]

    Gauge/string duality and scalar glueball mass ratios

    H. Boschi-Filho and N. R. F. Braga, “Gauge / string duality and scalar glueball mass ratios,” JHEP 05 (2003) 009, arXiv:hep-th/0212207

  53. [53]

    QCD/String holographic mapping and glueball mass spectrum

    H. Boschi-Filho and N. R. F. Braga, “QCD / string holographic mapping and glueball mass spectrum,” Eur. Phys. J. C 32 (2004) 529–533, arXiv:hep-th/0209080. – 14 –

  54. [54]

    Models of f(R) cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests,

    W. Hu and I. Sawicki, “Models of f(R) cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests,” Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064004

  55. [55]

    Dark energy and dark matter as curvature effects?

    S. Capozziello, V. F. Cardone, and A. Troisi, “Dark energy and dark matter as curvature effects?” JCAP 2006 no. 08, (2006) 001

  56. [56]

    Spherically symmetric solutions in f(R) gravity via the noether symmetry approach,

    S. Capozziello, A. Stabile, and A. Troisi, “Spherically symmetric solutions in f(R) gravity via the noether symmetry approach,” Class. Quantum Grav. 24 no. 8, (2007) 2153

  57. [57]

    Anisotropic quark stars in f(R) = R1+ϵ gravity,

    J. M. Z. Pretel and S. B. Duarte, “Anisotropic quark stars in f(R) = R1+ϵ gravity,” Class. Quantum Grav. 39 no. 15, (2022) 155003. – 15 –