REVIEW 4 cited by
Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learning
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks are susceptible to various inference attacks as they remember information about their training data. We design white-box inference attacks to perform a comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning models. We measure the privacy leakage through parameters of fully trained models as well as the parameter updates of models during training. We design inference algorithms for both centralized and federated learning, with respect to passive and active inference attackers, and assuming different adversary prior knowledge. We evaluate our novel white-box membership inference attacks against deep learning algorithms to trace their training data records. We show that a straightforward extension of the known black-box attacks to the white-box setting (through analyzing the outputs of activation functions) is ineffective. We therefore design new algorithms tailored to the white-box setting by exploiting the privacy vulnerabilities of the stochastic gradient descent algorithm, which is the algorithm used to train deep neural networks. We investigate the reasons why deep learning models may leak information about their training data. We then show that even well-generalized models are significantly susceptible to white-box membership inference attacks, by analyzing state-of-the-art pre-trained and publicly available models for the CIFAR dataset. We also show how adversarial participants, in the federated learning setting, can successfully run active membership inference attacks against other participants, even when the global model achieves high prediction accuracies.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Stealth by Conformity: Evading Robust Aggregation through Adaptive Poisoning
An adaptive federated-learning backdoor attack uses membership-inference feedback on the global model to keep malicious updates statistically similar to benign ones, evading nine robust aggregation defenses in two ima...
-
Towards Characterizing and Limiting Information Exposure in DNN Layers
Framework quantifies per-layer sensitive information exposure in DNNs via generalization error and evaluates TEE-based protection for the most exposed layers against white-box membership inference.
-
Code Division Modulation Layers Against Forgetting and Inference in Continual Gait Identification
A fixed random sign-pattern layer per task preserves continual-learning accuracy and blocks confidence-based membership inference for attackers who lack the code.
-
Revisiting Privacy Preservation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Conceptual Boundaries, Risk Pathways, and a Protection-Strength Grading Framework
The paper synthesizes BCI privacy risks and introduces a three-dimensional framework that grades existing protection methods into four strength levels while flagging mental privacy as an unresolved neuroethical issue.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.