Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Optimisation of Activator Solutions for Geopolymer Synthesis: Thermochemical Stability, Sequencing, and Standardisation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that geopolymer activator solutions have a computable time\u2013temperature window of usable stability: they stabilize about one to one-and-a-half minutes after mixing, and they stay stable only while the cooling solution…

desk verdict A practically useful and honest paper on activator mixing and stability, but the quantitative stability windows rest on an untested temperature extrapolation of a 1952 isotherm; treat Table 5 as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12941 v1 pith:63ACRRUR submitted 2025-06-15 cond-mat.mtrl-sci math-phmath.MPmath.OCphysics.app-phphysics.chem-ph

Ramon Skane , Franca Jones , Arie van Riessen , Evan Jamieson , Xiao Sun , William D.A. Rickard This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scimath-phmath.MPmath.OCphysics.app-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords geopolymeractivatorsolutionsodiumsilicatesolubilitymodellingthermochemicalstability29SiNMRsilicaspeciationprocessstandardisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that geopolymer activator solutions\u2014alkaline mixtures of water, sodium hydroxide, and sodium silicate\u2014have a computable time\u2013temperature window of usable stability: they become thermodynamically stable roughly one to one-and-a-half minutes after mixing, and they remain stable only while the cooling solution stays above a temperature-dependent solubility boundary. If true, the common practice of leaving activators to \u2018equilibrate\u2019 overnight is unnecessary and can itself trigger irreversible precipitation. The paper also argues that mixing order matters, with water \u2192 NaOH \u2192 sodium silicate as the reliable sequence and other orders able to push the same composition into an unstable gel. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a concrete step toward reproducible, standardized activator preparation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the temperature-dependent unstable solubility surface in the H$_2$O\u2013Na$_2$O\u2013SiO$_2$ system, built by digitizing the 25 \u00b0C metastable and unstable boundary contours of the ternary diagram and shifting them linearly in temperature using partial derivatives of NaOH(aq) and quartz solubility (Equation 5). A stability vector $\lambda_X$ measures how far and in which direction a given solution state must move to hit a boundary; the roots $\lambda_{MS}(T)=0$ and $\lambda_{US}(T)=0$ define the temperatures where a cooling solution enters the metastable and unstable regions. Supporting this is a 29Si NMR-based speciation map in $Q^n$ notation ($n$ = number of bridging oxygens on a silicate tetrahedron), which shows that higher temperatures favor depolymerized, more reactive silicate species and that silicate speciation equilibrates within seconds to a couple of minutes.

What would settle it

Hold a solution with the same composition as Experiment C (final NaOH 8.1 M and a SiO$_2$-to-Na$_2$O molar ratio of 0.9) at 26.7 \u00b0C for 7.3 hours and check for irreversible gelling; if it remains fluid, the predicted unstable temperature is wrong. A sharper test is to measure the unstable solubility boundary of the ternary H$_2$O\u2013Na$_2$O\u2013SiO$_2$ system at, say, 40 \u00b0C and compare it with the model's linearly shifted surface.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that activator stability is not set by the SiO$_2$/Na$_2$O ratio alone, but by position in the full H$_2$O\u2013Na$_2$O\u2013SiO$_2$ composition\u2013temperature space. Using 29Si NMR speciation, prior thermodynamic cooling profiles, and solubility contours digitized from a 25 \u00b0C ternary isotherm, the authors construct metastable and unstable solubility hypersurfaces as functions of SiO$_2$ concentration, NaOH concentration, and temperature. A cooling activator crosses the unstable hypersurface at a temperature $T_{\lambda\mathrm{US}}$; for experimental solutions A and C this happens before ambient temperature (30.7 \u00b0C after 6.0 h and 26.7 \u00b0C after 7.3 h), while solution E remains metastable at ambient. The model also gives a lower bound of about 1\u20131.5 minutes for the solution to stabilize after adding sodium silicate. The paper concludes that activators should be used promptly while still warm and prepared in the order water, alkali hydroxide, soluble silicate, because crossing into the unstable region is treated as practically irreversible: reheating does not restore the fluid state.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted instability temperatures assume the 25 \u00b0C solubility boundaries can be shifted linearly in temperature using only pure NaOH and quartz solubility data, with no correction for concentrated mixed Na$_2$O\u2013SiO$_2$\u2013H$_2$O interactions or hydrated silicate solids.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Activator solutions can be mixed and used within minutes rather than after the \u226524 h \u2018equilibration\u2019 periods common in the literature.
  • Keeping the solution warm after adding sodium silicate preserves stability, because cooling can cross the unstable solubility surface and trigger practically irreversible gelling.
  • Mixing order matters independently of composition: water first, then sodium hydroxide, then sodium silicate avoids excursions into the unstable region, while other orders can precipitate unusable gel at identical final composition.
  • For a given recipe the model defines two numbers, $T_{\mathrm{Stable}}/t_{\mathrm{Stable}}$ and $T_{\lambda\mathrm{US}}/t_{\lambda\mathrm{US}}$, that practitioners can use as a quality-control window.
  • Dilution, not just the SiO$_2$/Na$_2$O ratio, determines where a solution sits relative to the solubility surfaces, so recipes should be reported by concentration in the ternary H$_2$O\u2013Na$_2$O\u2013SiO$_2$ space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hypersurface construction could be re-fit for potassium-silicate or mixed-alkali activators, which the paper does not do; a successful re-fit would test whether the stability-window concept generalizes beyond sodium systems.
  • The hysteresis claim suggests a direct check: cool an activator briefly into the predicted unstable region, reheat it, and measure whether dissolved silica and fluidity return; the paper observes irreversible gelling but does not report such a reheating assay.
  • In unheated laboratories the model implies seasonal ambient temperature shifts the effective $t_{\lambda\mathrm{US}}$; logging solution temperature rather than elapsed time would be a cheap process control the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a combined experimental and modelling study of sodium silicate-based geopolymer activator solutions. Using quantitative 29Si NMR speciation, a thermodynamic cooling model from prior work, and solubility boundaries digitized from a 1952 ternary isotherm, the authors construct 3D solubility hypersurfaces and define time–temperature stability windows for eight activator formulations. They report that activators are ready within about 1–1.5 minutes after mixing, that cooling from the initial stabilisation temperature can push concentrated solutions into an unstable region where precipitation is practically irreversible, and that the preferred feedstock addition sequence is water → NaOH → sodium silicate. The central quantitative claims are the predicted instability temperatures and times in Table 5 (e.g., solution C becomes unstable at 26.7 °C after 7.3 h), while direct observations confirm qualitatively that solutions A and C precipitate upon cooling whereas solution E remains translucent.

Significance. If the quantitative model is reliable, the paper makes a useful practical contribution: it would provide concrete, falsifiable stability windows for activator solutions and challenge the common but imprecise practice of allowing 24-hour 'equilibration' periods. The experimental observations of A/C precipitation and E remaining stable give independent qualitative support for the temperature-driven instability ranking, and the proposed sequence (water → NaOH → silicate) is plausible and practically actionable. The machine-readable (though not code-reproduced) model, the use of established speciation data, and the explicit presentation of fitted polynomial coefficients in Appendix B are strengths. However, the quantitative stability windows, which are the main novelty, rest on an untested temperature extrapolation of the solubility boundaries, and the claimed experimental validation is only qualitative. The paper's significance therefore depends on whether that extrapolation can be justified or the claims appropriately softened.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.4, Eq. (5), Appendix B] The temperature dependence of both the metastable and unstable solubility boundaries is implemented by a rigid linear translation of the 25 °C Vail isotherm using partial derivatives taken from pure-component NaOH(aq) and quartz solubility curves (Eqs. B.2–B.5). No correction is included for the concentrated mixed Na2O–SiO2–H2O system, hydrated sodium silicate solids, or the fact that the boundaries being shifted were manually digitized from a ternary contour. Since the quantitative TλUS and tλUS values in Table 5 are obtained by intersecting the cooling trajectory with this translated surface, the numerical windows—including the distinction between C becoming unstable and E remaining stable—are unsupported without either mixed-system solubility data at additional temperatures, a sensitivity analysis with respect to the derivative terms, or an explicit justification for why the pure-component derivatives dominate.
  2. [Section 3.2.2, Table 5, Highlights] The paper states that the model is 'experimentally validated', but the validation is qualitative: the observations that A and C precipitate and E remains translucent confirm that A and C cross the unstable surface at some temperature during cooling, but they do not confirm the specific predicted values (e.g., C at 26.7 °C after 7.3 h). In addition, the tλUS values are extrapolated from the cooling model of Skane et al. [16], which is itself not re-validated in this paper. The authors should either provide quantitative validation (e.g., controlled cooling experiments that measure the onset of precipitation at known solution temperatures) or revise the validation claim and present the Table 5 values as model predictions that await direct test.
  3. [Section 2.4, Eq. (3)] The unstable boundary is a two-segment linear regression and the metastable boundary a hexic polynomial fitted to a manually drawn 1952 isotherm, with no uncertainty quantification beyond the R² for the hexic fit. The y-intercept of the unstable boundary is noted to deviate from the literature NaOH solubility (24.13 vs 25 mol/L), yet the consequences of this and of digitization error for λX, TλUS, and tλUS are not examined. A perturbation or sensitivity analysis of Table 5 with respect to boundary coefficients would clarify how robust the central claim—that A and C become unstable while E does not—actually is.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (7)] Equation 7 contains an apparent typo, '(71)', in the last line; it should be '(7)'.
  2. [Table 3] The stability conditions in Table 3 are difficult to parse; for example, the metastable row lists 'C_SiO2 ≤ 0' which seems inconsistent with the surrounding text. Please reformat the conditions clearly.
  3. [Abstract and Keywords] There are minor typographical errors: 'stabile' in the abstract, 'Akali Activator' in the keywords, and 'Jounral' in reference [17].
  4. [Section 2.3] The combined speciation model has a discontinuity at SiO2/Na2O = 2. The paper dismisses interpolation as unnecessary, but a brief statement of the magnitude of the jump and its effect on model outputs would help the reader assess the uncertainty for compositions near that ratio, especially since the feedstock itself (SiO2/Na2O = 2.4) is above it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the stability-window predictions are built from external solubility data and the prior cooling model, with the A/C/E observations used as validation rather than as fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its predictions. The solubility boundaries in Equation 3 are digitized from Vail's 1952 ternary isotherm, the temperature derivatives in Equation 5 and Appendix B are taken from external NaOH and quartz solubility data, and the cooling profiles used for the time-stability windows come from the authors' prior Skane et al. [16] model. The A, C and E experimental observations described in Section 3.2.2 are compared with the model after construction; they are not used to fit C_US or C_MS, so the predicted instability is not statistically forced by the validation data. The self-citations to [16] are load-bearing for the cooling trajectory, but that prior work is an independent, published thermodynamic model rather than an argument that reduces to this paper's conclusions. The main weakness, namely that Equation 5 linearly translates the Vail contour using only pure-phase NaOH and quartz solubility derivatives without mixed-system corrections, is an extrapolation and validity concern, not a circularity. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's predictive power rests on several layers of polynomial fits to literature solubility and speciation data, plus the prior cooling model. The core qualitative trend is supported by direct observation of precipitates for solutions A and C, but the quantitative windows carry no propagated uncertainty.

free parameters (6)
  • US boundary piecewise coefficients = C_US: 24.13-4.92*C_SiO2 (C<=3.47); 0.33+1.95*C_SiO2 (C>3.47)
    Determined by linear regression on digitized points from the manually drawn Vail (1952) isotherm; these coefficients set the unstable NaOH concentration in Equation 3.
  • MS boundary hexic polynomial coefficients = Coefficients B.1, a0=8.98e0 to a6=1.00e-3
    Fitted to the discretized Vail metastable contour with reported R2=99.54; defines the metastable solubility surface used for TλMS.
  • NaOH solubility polynomial coefficients = Hexic coefficients in Table B.2 over 15-95 C
    Least-squares fit to NaOH(aq) solubility data from Lach et al. and CRC; used to extrapolate the US boundary with temperature.
  • Quartz solubility polynomial coefficients = Cubic coefficients in Table B.4 over 0-200 C
    Fit to Rimstidt quartz solubility; used in the temperature derivative of the metastable boundary.
  • Speciation polynomial coefficients from Provis and Harris = Tables C.1-C.10 coefficients
    Literature-derived polynomial fits used as initial conditions for Q^n species; not re-fit in this paper but still parameters the model inherits.
  • Speciation temperature derivative polynomial coefficients = Tables C.11-C.14 coefficients
    One-sided backwards finite differences of Kinrade and Swaddle data; extrapolate speciation over temperature in Equation 1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Vail's 1952 ternary phase diagram boundaries accurately locate stable, metastable and unstable solution domains at 25 C.
    The solubility model starts by discretizing the manually drawn contours in Figure 2; no modern ternary phase-equilibrium data are used.
  • ad hoc to paper Temperature dependence of the phase boundaries equals the pure-component NaOH(aq) and quartz solubility temperature derivatives.
    Equation 5 linearly propagates boundaries using ∂C_X/∂T from NaOH and quartz solubility alone, ignoring concentrated mixed alkali-silicate interactions and hydrated silicate solids.
  • domain assumption Dissolved silica speciation reaches equilibrium within seconds to a few minutes, so steady-state modeling is appropriate.
    Adopted from Bahlmann et al. and Provis and van Deventer; underlies the use of Equation 1 at steady state and the 1 to 1.5 minute readiness claim.
  • domain assumption Crossing the unstable boundary is practically irreversible due to thermochemical hysteresis.
    Relied on to argue that reheating cannot restore a precipitated activator; taken from Nordström et al., not demonstrated in this study.
  • domain assumption The calorimetric cooling profiles from Skane et al. [16] apply to the activators in this study.
    The time-stability window in Table 5 and Figure 7 is computed by combining the solubility surface with cooling curves from the prior paper; no new cooling measurements are presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimisation of Activator Solutions for Geopolymer Synthesis: Thermochemical Stability, Sequencing, and Standardisation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/63ACRRUR

@misc{pith2026250612941,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimisation of Activator Solutions for Geopolymer Synthesis: Thermochemical Stability, Sequencing, and Standardisation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/63ACRRUR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12941}
}
read the original abstract

Geopolymers present a sustainable alternative to conventional binders, however, their commercial viability is hindered by a lack of standardised methods for preparing stabile activator solutions; alkaline feedstocks critical to geopolymer synthesis. This study presents a combined experimental and modelling approach to evaluate the thermochemical stability, solubility constraints, and silica speciation behaviour of sodium silicate-based activators. Using quantitative 29Si NMR analysis, thermodynamic stability and three-dimensional solubility modelling, this research identifies optimal preparation conditions that minimise irreversible precipitation risks and optimises mixing periods. Key findings indicate that higher solution temperatures associated with optimised activator solution preparation were found to enhance thermochemical stability and reactivity, while cooling increased viscosity and the likelihood of unstable solution behaviour, which may necessitate discarding. The order in which feedstocks are combined directly affects whether the solution becomes unstable, with an optimal sequence of water, alkali-hydroxide, soluble silicate found to ensure greater process reliability. A predictive model and accompanying visual tools enable practitioners to assess solution viability and define stability windows by quantifying initial and final/unstable periods and temperatures based on feedstock composition and solution temperature. These results contribute to improved reproducibility and quality control in geopolymer research and represent a step toward developing standard operating procedures for activator solution synthesis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Comparison of embodied energies of Ordinary Portland Cement with Bayer-derived geopolymer products,

    E. Jamieson, B. McLellan, A. van Riessen and H. Nikraz, “Comparison of embodied energies of Ordinary Portland Cement with Bayer-derived geopolymer products,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 99, pp. 112-118, 2015

    work page 2015

  2. [1]

    Experimentally validated model quantifies thermochemical stability in activator solutions

    work page

  3. [2]

    Solubility model predicts time-temperature windows for optimised solution stability

    work page

  4. [3]

    Higher temperatures enhance thermochemical stability, cooling increases precipitation risk

    work page

  5. [4]

    Feedstock sequencing affects stability: H2O → NaOH → silicate is preferred

    work page

  6. [5]

    not fully understood

    Model enables reproducible synthesis and supports SOPs for geopolymer mixing Keywords Geopolymer; Akali Activator; Process Optimisation; Solubility. 2 Abstract Geopolymers present a sustainable alternative to conventional binders: however, their commercial viability is hindered by a lack of standardised methods for preparing stabile activator solutions – ...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement,

    B. C. McLellan, R. P. Williams, J. Lay, A. van Riessen and G. D. Corder, “Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement,” Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 1080- 1090, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [7]

    This significantly reduces the ≥ 24-hour preparation times commonly cited in the geopolymer literature, enabling faster and more efficient mixing procedures and process control

    Minimised Preparation Times: Results reinforce that activator solutions can be prepared and used within approximately 1–1.5 minutes, comprising ~1 minute for alkali thermodynamic stabilisation and seconds for silica speciation equilibration (the latter of which is supported from qNMR analyses in this paper). This significantly reduces the ≥ 24-hour prepar...

    work page

Show all 51 references
  1. [8]

    time-instability window

    Quantification of Activator Thermochemical Stability Boundaries: Activator solutions exhibit greater thermochemical stability and workability at elevated temperatures (below boiling point), while cooling increases the risk of irreversible precipitation. This transition into no...

  2. [9]

    The optimal sequence is: (1) solvent water, (2) alkali hydroxide, and (3) soluble silicate

    Optimisation of Activator Feedstock Sequencing: Experimental results confirm that feedstock addition order affects stability. The optimal sequence is: (1) solvent water, (2) alkali hydroxide, and (3) soluble silicate. Altering this order increases the likelihood of entering un...

  3. [10]

    Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials,

    J. Davidovits, “Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials,” Journal of Thermal Analysis, vol. 37, pp. 429-441, 1991

    1991

  4. [11]

    Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: Part I - Low Si/Al Ratio Systems,

    L. Weng and Sagoe-Crentsil, “Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: Part I - Low Si/Al Ratio Systems,” Journal of Material Sciences, pp. 2997-3006, 2007

    2007

  5. [12]

    Geopolymer concrete—No longer labcrete,

    J. Aldred, J. Day and T. Glasby, “Geopolymer concrete—No longer labcrete,” in Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures, Singapore, 2015

    2015

  6. [13]

    The Use of a Proprietary Geopolymer Concrete in Sewer Infrastructure,

    T. Glasby, J. Day, R. Genrich and M. Kemp, “The Use of a Proprietary Geopolymer Concrete in Sewer Infrastructure,” in 29th Biennial National Conference of the Concrete Institute of Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2019

    2019

  7. [14]

    Assessing the suitability of three Australian fly ashes as an aluminosilicate source for geopolymers in high temperature applications,

    W. D. Rickard, R. Williams, J. Temuujin and A. Van Riessen, “Assessing the suitability of three Australian fly ashes as an aluminosilicate source for geopolymers in high temperature applications,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 528, no. 9, pp. 3390-3397, 2011

    2011

  8. [15]

    Geopolymer: A Systematic Review of Methodologies,

    J. Matsimbe, M. Dinka, D. Olukanni and I. Musonda, “Geopolymer: A Systematic Review of Methodologies,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 19, p. 6852, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Why geopolymers and alkali-activated materials are key components of a sustainable world: A perspective contribution,

    W. M. Kriven, C. Leonelli, J. L. Provis, A. R. Boccaccini, C. Attwell, V. S. Ducman, C. Ferone, S. Rossignol, T. Luukkonen, J. S. J. van Deventer, J. V. Emiliano and J. E. Lombardi, “Why geopolymers and alkali-activated materials are key components of a sustainable world: A pe...

    2024

  10. [18]

    Current development of geopolymer as alternative adsorbent for heavy metal removal,

    T. How Tan, K. H. Mo, T.-C. Ling and S. Hin Lai, “Current development of geopolymer as alternative adsorbent for heavy metal removal,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 18, p. 100684, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Bayer -geopolymers: An exploration of synergy between the alumina and geopolymer industries,

    A. van Riessen, E. Jamieson, C. S. Kealley, R. D. Hart and R. P. Williams, “Bayer -geopolymers: An exploration of synergy between the alumina and geopolymer industries,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 41, pp. 29-33, 2013

    2013

  12. [20]

    Rethinking Cement,

    Beyond Zero Emissions, “Rethinking Cement,” Beyond Zero Emissions Inc., Melbourne, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Carbon dioxide emissions from traditional and modified concrete. A review,

    O. F. Arbeláez-Pérez, V. Senior-Arrieta, J. Hernán Gómez Ospina, S. Herrera Herrera, C. Ferney Rodríguez Rojas and A. María Santis Navarro, “Carbon dioxide emissions from traditional and modified concrete. A review,” Environmental Development, vol. 52, p. 101036, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Geopolymer,

    J. Matsimbe, M. Dinka, D. Olukanni and I. Musonda, “A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Geopolymer,” Materials, vol. 15, pp. 1-20, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Influence of anionic silica forms in clear sodium silicate precursors on metakaolin geopolymerisation via 29Si and 27Al MAS-NMR and microstructural studies,

    G. D. Poggetto, C. Leonelli and A. Spinella, “Influence of anionic silica forms in clear sodium silicate precursors on metakaolin geopolymerisation via 29Si and 27Al MAS-NMR and microstructural studies,” J Mater Sci, vol. 59, pp. 16963-16980, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Controlling the reactivity of silicate solutions: A FTIR, Raman and NMR Study,

    L. Vidal, E. Joussein, M. Colas, J. Cornette, J. Sanz, I. Sobrados, J.-L. Gelet, J. Absi and S. Rossignol, “Controlling the reactivity of silicate solutions: A FTIR, Raman and NMR Study,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 503, pp. 101-109, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Predicting the stability of geopolymer activator solutions for optimised synthesis through thermodynamic modelling,

    R. Skane, P. A. Schneider, F. Jones, A. van Riessen, E. Jamieson, X. Sun and W. D. A. Rickard, “Predicting the stability of geopolymer activator solutions for optimised synthesis through thermodynamic modelling,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 515, p. 163543, 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Polymerization in sodium silicate solutions: a fundamental process in geopolymerization technology,

    D. Dimas, I. Giannopoulou and Panias, “Polymerization in sodium silicate solutions: a fundamental process in geopolymerization technology,” Jounral of Material Sciences, pp. 3719-3730, 2009

    2009

  19. [27]

    Activating solution chemistry for geopolymers,

    J. L. Provis, “Activating solution chemistry for geopolymers,” in Geopolymers: Structures, Processing, Properties and Industrial Applications, J. L. Provis and J. S. J. van Deventer, Eds., Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, 2009, pp. 50-71. 32

    2009

  20. [28]

    What can vibrational spectroscopy tell about the structure of dissolved sodium silicates?,

    I. Halasz, M. Agarwal, L. Runbo and N. Miller, “What can vibrational spectroscopy tell about the structure of dissolved sodium silicates?,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 135, pp. 74-81, 2010

    2010

  21. [29]

    A review of sodium silicate solutions: Structure, gelation, and syneresis,

    M. Matinfar and J. A. Nychka, “A review of sodium silicate solutions: Structure, gelation, and syneresis,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 322, p. 103036, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Modeling Speciation in Highly Concentrated Alkaline Silicate Solutions,

    J. Provis, P. Duxson, G. C. Lukey, F. Separovic, W. M. Kriven and J. S. J. van Deventer, “Modeling Speciation in Highly Concentrated Alkaline Silicate Solutions,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 44, no. 23, pp. 8899-8908, 2005

    2005

  23. [31]

    Aqueous aluminates, silicates, and aluminosilicates,

    T. W. Swaddle, J. Salerno and P. A. Tregolan, “Aqueous aluminates, silicates, and aluminosilicates,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 319-325, 1994

    1994

  24. [32]

    MS” and “US

    between molar ranges of 0.25 ≤ SiO2/Na2O ≤ 2 and 2 < SiO2/Na2O ≤ 4, respectively. Both models were merged into a single hybridised map (Figure C.1, Appendix C) spanning a wide SiO2/Na2O range to include the sodium silicate feedstock (i.e. SiO2/Na2O = 2.41) and activator soluti...

  25. [33]

    29Si NMR Spectroscopy of Silicate Solutions. II. On the Dependence of Structure of Silicate Anions in Water Solutions from the Na:Si Ratio,

    G. Engelhardt, D. Zeigan, H. Jancke, D. Hoebbel and W. Wieker, “29Si NMR Spectroscopy of Silicate Solutions. II. On the Dependence of Structure of Silicate Anions in Water Solutions from the Na:Si Ratio,” Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem, vol. 17, p. 418, 1975

    1975

  26. [34]

    The Viscosity Properties of Sodium Silicate Solutions,

    X. Yang, W. Zhu and Q. Yang, “The Viscosity Properties of Sodium Silicate Solutions,” J Solution Chem, vol. 37, pp. 73-83, 2008

    2008

  27. [35]

    Silicate species of water glass and insights for alkali -activated green cement,

    H. Jansson, D. Bernin and K. Ramser, “Silicate species of water glass and insights for alkali -activated green cement,” AIP Advances, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 067167, 2015

    2015

  28. [36]

    State-of-the-Art of Colloidal Silica-Based Soil Liquefaction Mitigation: An Emerging Technique for Ground Improvement,

    M. Zhao, G. Liu, C. Zhang, W. Guo and Q. Luo, “State-of-the-Art of Colloidal Silica-Based Soil Liquefaction Mitigation: An Emerging Technique for Ground Improvement,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 15, 2020

    2020

  29. [37]

    Soluble Silicates: Their Properties and Uses,

    J. G. Vail, “Soluble Silicates: Their Properties and Uses,” American Chemical Society. Monograph Series, no. 116, 1952. 33

    1952

  30. [38]

    The System Na2O-CaO-SiO2-H2O,

    P. W. Brown, “The System Na2O-CaO-SiO2-H2O,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 3457-61, 1990

    1990

  31. [39]

    Quartz solubility at low temperatures,

    J. D. Rimstidt, “Quartz solubility at low temperatures,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 61, pp. 2553-2558, 1997

    1997

  32. [40]

    Engineering Equation Solver,

    F-Chart Software, “Engineering Equation Solver,” F-Chart Software, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://fchartsoftware.com/ees/

    2025

  33. [41]

    Quantitative silicon -29 NMR investigations of highly concentrated high-ratio sodium silicate solutions,

    R. K. Harris, E. K. F. Bahlmann, K. Metcalfe and E. G. Smith, “Quantitative silicon -29 NMR investigations of highly concentrated high-ratio sodium silicate solutions,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 31, pp. 743-747, 1993

    1993

  34. [42]

    Silicon-29 NMR studies of aqueous silicate solutions. 1. Chemical shifts and equilibria,

    S. D. Kinrade and T. W. Swaddle, “Silicon-29 NMR studies of aqueous silicate solutions. 1. Chemical shifts and equilibria,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 27, no. 23, pp. 4081-4332, 1988

    1988

  35. [43]

    Viscosities and Densities of Concentrated Aqueous NaOH/NaAl(OH)4 Mixtures at 25 °C,

    P. Sipos, A. Stanley, S. Bevis, G. Hefter and P. M. May, “Viscosities and Densities of Concentrated Aqueous NaOH/NaAl(OH)4 Mixtures at 25 °C,” J. Chem. Eng, vol. 46, pp. 657-661, 2001

    2001

  36. [44]

    A. Lach, L. André, A. Lassin, M. Azaroual, J.-P. Serin and P. Cézac, “A New Pitzer Parameterization for the Binary NaOH–H2O and Ternary NaOH–NaCl–H2O and NaOH–LiOH–H2O Systems up to NaOH Solid Salt Saturation, from 273.15 to 523.15 K and at Saturated Vapor Pressure,” Journal o...

    2015

  37. [45]

    Physical Constants of Inorganic Compounds,

    W. M. Haynes, D. R. Lide and T. J. Bruno, Eds., “Physical Constants of Inorganic Compounds,” in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 97th ed., Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2017, p. 4.86

    2017

  38. [46]

    Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties,

    P. Duxson, J. L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, S. W. Mallicoat, W. M. Kriven and J. S. van Deventer, “Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 269, no...

    2005

  39. [47]

    Silicon -29 NMR self- diffusion and chemical-exchange studies of concentrated sodium silicate solutions,

    E. K. F. Bahlmann, R. K. Harris, K. Metcalfe, J. W. Rockliffe and E. G. Smith, “Silicon -29 NMR self- diffusion and chemical-exchange studies of concentrated sodium silicate solutions,” J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 93-98, 1997

    1997

  40. [48]

    Geopolymerisation kinetics. 2. Reaction kinetic modelling,

    J. Provis and J. S. J. van Deventer, “Geopolymerisation kinetics. 2. Reaction kinetic modelling,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 62, pp. 2318-2329, 2007

    2007

  41. [49]

    Thermodynamic mixing properties of sodium silicate liquids and implications for liquid–liquid immiscibility,

    G. L. Hovis, M. J. Toplis and P. Richet, “Thermodynamic mixing properties of sodium silicate liquids and implications for liquid–liquid immiscibility,” Chemical Geology, vol. 213, no. 1-3, pp. 173-186, 2004

    2004

  42. [50]

    Concentration- and pH-dependence of highly alkaline sodium silicate solutions,

    J. Nordström, E. Nilsson, P. Jarvol, M. Nayeri, A. Palmqvist, J. Bergenholtz and A. Matic, “Concentration- and pH-dependence of highly alkaline sodium silicate solutions,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 356, no. 1, pp. 37-45, 2011

    2011

  43. [51]

    Dissolution mechanism of fly ash to quantify the reactive aluminosilicates in geopolymerisation,

    C. Kuenzel and N. Ranjbar, “Dissolution mechanism of fly ash to quantify the reactive aluminosilicates in geopolymerisation,” Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2019. 9 Supplementary Information & Appendices 9.1 Appendix A: List of Variables and Notation Refer below to the n...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.