Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 105 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

One dark angle controls both halo collisions and detector signals

2026-07-09 11:44 UTC pith:6MPLFQ6H

load-bearing objection Clean idea linking dark-sector θ to both SIDM and direct detection; quantitative claims hinge on an untested chiral regime the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07406 v1 pith:6MPLFQ6H submitted 2026-07-08 hep-ph

Dark Neutrons as Dark Matter: Collisions in Halos and Direct Detection from Dark CP Violation

Pablo Figueroa , Camilo Garc\'ia-Cely , Giacomo Landini This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords self-interacting dark mattercomposite dark matterCP violationdark photondirect detectiondark piontopological angleelectric dipole moment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that a single parameter — the topological angle θ in a confining dark sector — can simultaneously generate the velocity-dependent self-interactions needed to address small-scale structure problems and the electric dipole moments that enhance direct detection rates. In a QCD-like dark sector with dark neutrons as dark matter, a nonzero θ induces CP-violating couplings between dark pions and dark baryons. These couplings produce an attractive Yukawa potential mediated by the naturally light dark pions, yielding self-scattering cross sections in the range relevant for self-interacting dark matter (0.1–100 cm²/g at dwarf-galaxy velocities, dropping below cluster bounds). The same θ also generates a calculable dark neutron electric dipole moment that, through a dark photon portal, dominates direct detection recoil rates and can be distinguished from CP-conserving magnetic dipole interactions by its distinct annual modulation pattern. The paper presents a benchmark point (dark neutron mass ~96 GeV, dark pion mass ~558 MeV, dark photon mass ~150 MeV) where both phenomena are simultaneously realized and consistent with cosmological, astrophysical, and laboratory constraints.

Core claim

The central mechanism is that the topological angle θ in a confining dark sector induces a scalar pion-baryon coupling ḡ_πNN proportional to θ (Eq. 2.4), which is qualitatively different from the ordinary pseudoscalar coupling g_πNN. The scalar coupling generates an attractive long-range Yukawa potential V(r) = -ḡ²_πNN/(4π) · e^{-m_π r}/r (Eq. 3.2) that is not velocity-suppressed, unlike the CP-conserving interaction which gives cross sections suppressed by v⁴. This same θ simultaneously induces a dark neutron electric dipole moment d_n ∝ θ (Eq. 4.4) through loop diagrams involving the CP-violating pion coupling. The paper shows that both the self-interaction cross sections relevant for halo

What carries the argument

The topological angle θ; the CP-violating scalar pion-baryon coupling ḡ_πNN ∝ θ; the Yukawa potential V(r) ∝ -ḡ²_πNN e^{-m_π r}/(4πr); the dark neutron electric dipole moment d_n ≃ (e_d/2m_n)(g_πNN ḡ_πNN/2π²) log(m_n/m_π±); the dark photon portal with kinetic mixing ε connecting dark and visible sectors

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative assumption that the pion-nucleon couplings g_πNN and ḡ_πNN are sufficiently small (roughly below √(4π)) to justify computing self-scattering cross sections using perturbation theory. The benchmark uses ḡ_πNN = 0.35, but the paper acknowledges that Standard Model QCD does not satisfy this condition (g_πNN is much larger than 1), so the quantitative predictions for both self-interaction cross sections and direct detection rates could be different if the non-pet

What would settle it

If lattice QCD calculations for the CP-violating pion-baryon coupling in the relevant parameter regime show that the perturbative Yukawa potential analysis substantially overestimates or mischaracterizes the self-scattering cross section, or if the dark neutron electric dipole moment induced by θ differs significantly from the one-loop estimate, the quantitative link between halo self-interactions and direct detection rates would break down. Additionally, if future direct detection experiments exclude the benchmark parameter space (dark neutron mass ~100 GeV, kinetic mixing ε ~ 10⁻⁵) without a

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If θ is the common origin for both halo self-interactions and direct detection signals, a future detection of a dark neutron EDM-like recoil spectrum would imply a specific prediction for the dark matter self-interaction cross section in halos, and vice versa, making the two observables correlated rather than independent.
  • The annual modulation phase reversal between the EDM operator O_11 and the magnetic dipole operator O_5 provides a potential experimental discriminant for the CP-violating origin of a direct detection signal, though the paper notes this would require roughly 100× more events than detecting the time-averaged rate.
  • The framework naturally accommodates gravothermal collapse regimes (σ/m ~ 100 cm²/g at low velocities), connecting to recent observations of unusually compact dark matter halos.
  • The CP-violating dynamics from θ could itself play a role in generating the primordial dark matter asymmetry, potentially linking the relic abundance mechanism to the same parameter governing halo physics and direct detection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If lattice calculations of the CP-violating pion-baryon coupling in the non-perturbative regime (where g_πNN ≳ 1, as in Standard Model QCD) confirm that the Yukawa potential structure persists with enhanced strength, the viable parameter space for simultaneously achieving SIDM phenomenology and detectable direct detection signals could be significantly broader than the perturbative benchmark sugge
  • The correlation between self-interaction cross sections and direct detection rates through the single parameter θ implies that null results from direct detection experiments can be translated into upper bounds on dark matter self-interactions in this framework, and conversely, astrophysical measurements of halo core densities can constrain the direct detection signal strength.
  • If future dark photon searches (beam-dump, fixed-target) probe the kinetic mixing parameter space below the current bounds used in the benchmark, the direct detection signal could be tested independently of dark matter recoil experiments, providing a complementary probe of the same dark sector parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper studies the phenomenology of composite dark matter in a QCD-like confining dark sector with a non-vanishing topological angle $θ$. The central observation is that $θ$ induces CP-violating scalar pion–baryon couplings ($̄g_{πNN} ∝ θ$), which generate an attractive Yukawa potential between dark neutrons mediated by light dark pions. This simultaneously yields velocity-dependent self-interactions relevant for small-scale structure and, via a dark photon portal, induces a dark neutron electric dipole moment that enhances direct detection rates. The self-scattering cross section is computed non-perturbatively via the variable-phase method (Schrödinger equation), and the direct detection signal is matched onto the NREFT framework, with limits derived from LZ (2025) data. A benchmark point (Table 1) illustrates the simultaneous realization of SIDM phenomenology and observable direct detection. The chiral Lagrangian derivation of the CP-violating couplings is presented in Appendix A for $N_f = 2$ and generalized to arbitrary $N_f$ in Appendix B.

Significance. The paper presents a well-motivated and internally coherent framework in which a single parameter ($θ$) controls both dark matter self-interactions and direct detection rates, providing a concrete realization of the SIDM paradigm within a composite dark sector. The non-perturbative treatment of self-scattering via the variable-phase method (Eqs. 3.5–3.6) is a strength, as is the systematic NREFT matching for direct detection (Table 2) and the honest assessment of annual modulation prospects (Sec. 4.4). The EDM loop calculation (Eq. 4.4) correctly reproduces the SM neutron analogue. The generalization to arbitrary $N_f$ in Appendix B adds value. The framework is falsifiable through both astrophysical and laboratory observables. The main limitation is the reliance on leading-order chiral Lagrangian relations for the pion–nucleon couplings in a regime where the axial coupling $g_A$ is very small, which has not been independently verified.

major comments (2)
  1. Appendix A, Eq. (A.3): The Goldberger-Treiman relation gives $g_{πNN} = g_A m_n / f_π$. With the benchmark values $g_{πNN} = 0.11$, $m_n = 96.14$ GeV, and $f_π ∼ √{N_c} m_n/(4π)$ for $N_c = 3$, one infers $g_A ≈ 0.015$, which is two orders of magnitude below the SM value of 1.27. The paper does not discuss whether such a small axial coupling is natural or achievable in a concrete $SU(3)$ gauge theory with $N_f = 2$. While the chiral expansion parameter $m_π/Λ$ is well-controlled, the reliability of the leading-order Goldberger-Treiman relation when $g_A$ is this small has not been verified. If NLO chiral corrections to this relation are large for small $g_A$, the derived value of $̄g_{πNN}$ — and hence both the self-interaction cross section and the EDM — could be shifted. The authors should add a discussion of this point, including whether NLO corrections to the Goldberger-Treiman ratio
  2. Sec. 2.2 and Appendix A: The perturbativity condition $g_{πNN}, ̄g_{πNN} ≲ √{4π}$ is stated, and the benchmark satisfies it ($g_{πNN} = 0.11$, $̄g_{πNN} = 0.35$). However, the paper acknowledges that the SM does not satisfy this condition ($g_{πNN} ≫ 1$). The concern is not about the self-scattering calculation (which is solved non-perturbatively via the Schrödinger equation), but about the validity of the leading-order chiral Lagrangian derivation of the couplings themselves. The paper should clarify more explicitly that the perturbativity assumption concerns the chiral Lagrangian derivation of Eqs. (2.4) and (A.3), not the scattering calculation, and discuss whether the benchmark point lies in a regime where this leading-order derivation is trustworthy.
minor comments (7)
  1. Table 1: The parameter $c$ (appearing in Eq. 2.4) is not listed. Given that $c = 0.7$ in the SM (footnote 1), it would be useful to state the value used for the benchmark explicitly.
  2. Sec. 2.4, Eq. (2.8): The pion lifetime formula depends on $N_c$ and $e_d$. For the benchmark, $e_d = 1.0$ is used but not stated in Table 1; adding it would help reproducibility.
  3. Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.1): The tree-level cross section is expanded to $O(v^4)$, but the non-perturbative result in Eq. (3.6) is used for all subsequent results. A brief statement of the range of validity of Eq. (3.1) versus the full Schrödinger treatment would be useful.
  4. Figure 1: The color scheme distinguishing the SIDM-favored regions (light blue, dark blue) and the cluster-excluded region could be clarified; the legend is small and difficult to read.
  5. Sec. 4.4, Fig. 7: The y-axis labels show very small numerical values with limited significant figures (e.g., '6.2 × 10⁻³'). Consider using scientific notation more consistently or adjusting the axis scale.
  6. Sec. 5: The statement that the benchmark is 'located close to the peak in Fig. 1, where the overlap between the two requirements is favorable' could be quantified — how sensitive are the conclusions to the exact choice of benchmark point within the overlap region?
  7. Reference [88] (LZ 2025): The citation appears to be to a 2025 result; please confirm this is publicly available or appropriately cited at the production stage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying two important points regarding the reliability of the leading-order chiral Lagrangian relations. We address each comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Appendix A, Eq. (A.3): The Goldberger-Treiman relation gives g_{πNN} = g_A m_n / f_π. With the benchmark values g_{πNN} = 0.11, m_n = 96.14 GeV, and f_π ~ √{N_c} m_n/(4π) for N_c = 3, one infers g_A ≈ 0.015, which is two orders of magnitude below the SM value of 1.27. The paper does not discuss whether such a small axial coupling is natural or achievable in a concrete SU(3) gauge theory with N_f = 2. While the chiral expansion parameter m_π/Λ is well-controlled, the reliability of the leading-order Goldberger-Treiman relation when g_A is this small has not been verified. If NLO chiral corrections to this relation are large for small g_A, the derived value of ḡ_{πNN} — and hence both the self-interaction cross section and the EDM — could be shifted. The authors should add a discussion of this point, including whether NLO corrections to the Goldberger-Treiman ratio...

    Authors: We thank the referee for raising this important point, which we had not adequately addressed in the original manuscript. The referee's numerical inference is correct: the benchmark point implies g_A ≈ 0.015, which is indeed much smaller than the SM value of 1.27. We have thought carefully about whether this is problematic and conclude that it is a genuine caveat that must be stated explicitly, though it does not invalidate our framework. We address the two sub-questions separately. (1) Is a small g_A natural or achievable? The axial coupling g_A is a low-energy constant of the chiral Lagrangian that is not fixed by any symmetry of the SU(N_c) gauge theory with N_f = 2 vector-like fermions. In the SM, g_A ≈ 1.27 is an O(1) number, but there is no known symmetry argument or theorem requiring g_A to be O(1) in a generic confining gauge theory. Its value depends on non-perturbative strong dynamics and would need to be determined, e.g., by lattice calculations in the specific dark gauge theory. We are not aware of any mechanism that would make g_A parametrically small (in the way that, say, small quark masses make m_π parametrically small), so we cannot claim that g_A ≈ 0.015 is 'natural' in the technical sense. It is, however, not forbidden by any consistency condition. (2) Are NLO corrections to the Goldberger-Treiman relation enhanced for small g_A? This is the more substantive concern. At NLO in chiral perturbation theory, the Goldberger-Treiman discrepancy is Δ_GT = 1 − g_{πNN} f_π/(g_A m_N) = −2 m_π^2 d_18 / g_A, where d_18 is an NLO low-energy constant. The key observation is that Δ_GT is inversely proportional to g_A, so for g_A ≈ 0.015, even a modest value of d_18 could produce an O(1) correction to the LO Goldberger-Treiman relation. This would in turn shift the CP revision: partial

  2. Referee: Sec. 2.2 and Appendix A: The perturbativity condition g_{πNN}, ḡ_{πNN} ≲ √{4π} is stated, and the benchmark satisfies it (g_{πNN} = 0.11, ḡ_{πNN} = 0.35). However, the paper acknowledges that the SM does not satisfy this condition (g_{πNN} ≫ 1). The concern is not about the self-scattering calculation (which is solved non-perturbatively via the Schrödinger equation), but about the validity of the leading-order chiral Lagrangian derivation of the couplings themselves. The paper should clarify more explicitly that the perturbativity assumption concerns the chiral Lagrangian derivation of Eqs. (2.4) and (A.3), not the scattering calculation, and discuss whether the benchmark point lies in a regime where this leading-order derivation is trustworthy.

    Authors: We agree that this distinction should be made more explicit in the manuscript. The perturbativity condition g_{πNN}, ḡ_{πNN} ≲ √(4π) ensures that the tree-level extraction of the pion–baryon couplings from the leading-order chiral Lagrangian (Eqs. (2.4) and (A.3)) is reliable — i.e., that higher-order terms in the chiral expansion of the Lagrangian do not generate comparable or larger corrections to these couplings. It is a separate condition from the non-perturbative treatment of the scattering problem, which is solved exactly via the Schrödinger equation using the variable-phase method. We will revise Sec. 2.2 and Appendix A to state this distinction clearly. Regarding the benchmark: with g_{πNN} = 0.11 and ḡ_{πNN} = 0.35, both couplings are well below √(4π) ≈ 3.5, so the LO chiral derivation of the couplings is internally consistent at the level of the perturbative expansion in the couplings. The chiral expansion parameter m_π^2/Λ^2 ~ (m_π/(4π f_π))^2 ~ 10^{-4} for the benchmark is also well-controlled. However, as discussed in our response to the first comment, the small implied value of g_A introduces a separate concern about NLO corrections to the Goldberger-Treiman relation that is not captured by the perturbativity condition on the couplings alone. We will add a sentence cross-referencing this caveat when the perturbativity condition is introduced. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The naturalness of the small axial coupling g_A ≈ 0.015 implied by the benchmark point cannot be definitively assessed without non-perturbative input (e.g., lattice calculations) in the specific dark gauge theory. While no symmetry forbids a small g_A, we are not aware of a mechanism that would make it parametrically small, and the NLO Goldberger-Treiman discrepancy Δ_GT ∝ 1/g_A could be enhanced. This is an inherent limitation of the leading-order chiral analysis that we cannot fully resolve at present.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central derivation is self-contained against external QCD analogues and chiral perturbation theory

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the topological angle θ in a confining dark sector induces CP-violating pion-baryon couplings (Eq. 2.4: ḡ_πNN ∝ θ), which simultaneously generate velocity-dependent self-interactions (Yukawa potential Eq. 3.2) and enhance direct detection rates (dark EDM Eq. 4.4). Walking the derivation chain: (1) The CP-violating coupling ḡ_πNN is derived from the chiral Lagrangian (App. A, Eq. A.3) via the θ-dependent mass matrix χ⁽²⁾ (Eq. A.2), following the well-known Crewther-Di Vecchia-Veneziano-Witten result [28]. This is an external, standard result, not a self-citation. (2) The Yukawa potential V(r) ∝ −ḡ²_πNN e^{−m_π r}/(4πr) (Eq. 3.2) follows directly from the scalar coupling in Eq. 2.3 — a standard non-relativistic reduction, not circular. (3) The dark EDM d_n ∝ e_d g_πNN ḡ_πNN log(m_n/m_π±)/(2m_n) (Eq. 4.4) is computed from loop diagrams (Fig. 2) and is stated to agree with the SM neutron result [28, 82]. The inputs (g_πNN, ḡ_πNN, m_π, m_n) are independent parameters of the dark sector, not fitted to the target phenomenology. (4) The benchmark point (Table 1) is explicitly labeled as illustrative: 'The benchmark has been chosen to illustrate the simultaneous realization of the desired SIDM and direct-detection phenomenology.' The parameters are chosen, not fitted. (5) The non-perturbative scattering calculation (Eqs. 3.5–3.6) uses the variable-phase method to solve the Schrödinger equation with the Yukawa potential — a genuine computation, not a renaming. (6) The non-calculable form factors (b_n, μ_n) are estimated on dimensional grounds (b_n ∼ e_d/m²_n, μ_n ∼ e_d/(2m_n)) and are not fitted to data. The only minor concern is that two of the three authors co-authored Ref. [34] (cited for the θ-dependent mass matrix structure), but this citation is not load-bearing for the central claim — the same result follows from the standard chiral Lagrangian treatment of Refs. [28, 30, 82]. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction. The paper is self-contained against external QCD analogues and chiral perturbation theory benchmarks. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citation to Ref. [34] for the θ-dependent mass matrix, which is not load-bearing since the result is independently established by standard references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 5 axioms · 4 invented entities

The model has ~9 free parameters chosen to realize the phenomenology. The key parameter θ is not predicted but its effects are derived. The perturbative coupling assumption is the most structurally fragile axiom, as the paper itself acknowledges.

free parameters (9)
  • θ (topological angle) = O(1) implied; ḡ_πNN=0.35 in benchmark
    The CP-violating angle is a free parameter of the dark sector; its value is not predicted but chosen to yield phenomenologically interesting couplings.
  • m_n (dark neutron mass) = 96.14 GeV (benchmark)
    Set by the confinement scale; chosen in the benchmark to be in the asymmetric DM range.
  • m_π0 (dark pion mass) = 557.9 MeV (benchmark)
    Determined by quark masses and confinement scale; chosen to realize SIDM phenomenology.
  • m_V (dark photon mass) = 150 MeV (benchmark)
    Origin unspecified; chosen to satisfy m_π ≳ m_V and beam-dump constraints.
  • ε (kinetic mixing) = 2×10⁻⁵ (benchmark)
    Free parameter of the dark photon portal; chosen near current upper bounds to maximize direct detection signal.
  • e_d (dark gauge coupling) = 1.0 (benchmark)
    Free parameter of the dark U(1); sets charge assignments and mass splittings.
  • g_πNN (CP-conserving coupling) = 0.11 (benchmark)
    Determined by Goldberger-Treiman relation from g_A, f_π, m_n; g_A is a low-energy constant.
  • b_1 (chiral coupling) = Not specified numerically
    Unknown low-energy constant controlling ḡ_πNN; related to θ via Eq. A.3.
  • c (dimensionless constant) = 0.7 in SM
    Enters ḡ_πNN in Eq. 2.4; taken from SM analogy, value in dark sector unknown.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The dark sector confines with SU(N_c) and N_f light flavors, producing pseudo-Goldstone bosons and baryons analogous to QCD.
    Sec. 2.1: The entire framework relies on the low-energy dynamics being QCD-like.
  • ad hoc to paper Perturbation theory is valid for g_πNN, ḡ_πNN ≪ 1.
    Sec. 2.2 and App. A: The self-scattering cross-section calculations use perturbative couplings; the paper notes this is not realized in the SM and definitive conclusions beyond this regime are difficult.
  • domain assumption The DM relic abundance is set by a primordial asymmetry (asymmetric DM).
    Sec. 2.4: The cosmological history assumes asymmetric DM; the mechanism generating the asymmetry is unspecified.
  • domain assumption The dark photon mass origin is unspecified but treated as a given input.
    Sec. 2.3: 'We leave the origin of the dark photon mass unspecified.'
  • ad hoc to paper Non-calculable form factors (b_n, μ_n) are estimated dimensionally as ~e_d/Λ² and ~e_d/(2m_n).
    Sec. 4.1: Charge radius and magnetic moment are not computed but estimated on dimensional grounds, introducing O(1) uncertainties.
invented entities (4)
  • Dark neutron independent evidence
    purpose: Composite baryonic DM candidate
    Falsifiable via direct detection recoil spectra and self-interaction constraints; predicted EDM coupling is calculable.
  • Dark pion (π0, π±) independent evidence
    purpose: Light mediator of DM self-interactions
    Pseudo-Goldstone boson whose existence follows from the assumed chiral symmetry breaking; mass and couplings are constrained by the framework.
  • Dark photon (V) independent evidence
    purpose: Portal between dark and visible sectors
    Well-studied in the literature; constrained by beam-dump experiments and direct detection.
  • Dark topological angle θ independent evidence
    purpose: Source of CP violation controlling both self-interactions and EDM
    Parameter of the dark sector; its phenomenological effects are predicted and testable, though its value is not independently determined.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 30099 in / 3287 out tokens · 290108 ms · 2026-07-09T11:44:34.125858+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider confining gauge theories with a non-vanishing topological angle $\theta$, which induces CP-violating interactions among dark pions and dark baryons, with dark matter consisting of dark neutrons. The $\theta$ term generates scalar pion--baryon couplings analogous to the CP-violating pion--nucleon interactions of QCD. These interactions give rise to an attractive long-range Yukawa potential mediated by the dark pions, whose strength is proportional to $\theta$. Since the dark pions are naturally light pseudo-Goldstone bosons, the resulting force can lead to sizable dark matter self-interactions, providing a simple and theoretically motivated realization of the self-interacting dark matter paradigm. We also investigate the implications for direct detection in scenarios where the dark sector communicates with the Standard Model through a dark photon portal. The $\theta$ term induces dark electric dipole moments proportional to $\theta$, which couple directly to the electric fields of nuclei and can substantially enhance direct detection rates. We show how the underlying interactions shape the recoil spectra and discuss the possibility of identifying the CP-violating origin of the signal through its time dependence. Finally, we analyze the interplay between dark matter self-interactions and direct detection signals, showing that both are controlled by the same CP-violating parameter. Our results demonstrate that the topological angle $\theta$ can play a central role in determining the phenomenology of composite dark matter.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 86 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan, Dark Matter,2406.01705

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Rich Phenomenology from Simple Ingredients: A Review of Confining Dark Sectors

    P. Asadi, A. Batz and G.D. Kribs, Rich Phenomenology from Simple Ingredients: A Review of Confining Dark Sectors,2606.30760

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    SIMP Spectroscopy

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik and H. Murayama, SIMP Spectroscopy, JHEP05(2016) 090 [1512.07917]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Elastically Decoupling Dark Matter

    E. Kuflik, M. Perelstein, N.R.-L. Lorier and Y.-D. Tsai, Elastically Decoupling Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 221302 [1512.04545]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    WIMP and SIMP Dark Matter from the Spontaneous Breaking of a Global Group

    N. Bernal, C. Garcia-Cely and R. Rosenfeld, WIMP and SIMP Dark Matter from the Spontaneous Breaking of a Global Group, JCAP04(2015) 012 [1501.01973]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    $Z_2$ SIMP Dark Matter

    N. Bernal and X. Chu,Z 2 SIMP Dark Matter, JCAP01(2016) 006 [1510.08527]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Production Regimes for Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    N. Bernal, X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely, T. Hambye and B. Zaldivar, Production Regimes for Self-Interacting Dark Matter, JCAP03(2016) 018 [1510.08063]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    SIMP dark matter with gauged $Z_3$ symmetry

    S.-M. Choi and H.M. Lee, SIMP dark matter with gauged Z 3 symmetry, JHEP09(2015) 063 [1505.00960]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Resonant SIMP dark matter

    S.-M. Choi and H.M. Lee, Resonant SIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B758(2016) 47 [1601.03566]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Hidden SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter

    A. Soni and Y. Zhang, Hidden SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 115025 [1602.00714]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    SIMP from a strong U(1) gauge theory with a monopole condensation

    A. Kamada, M. Yamada, T.T. Yanagida and K. Yonekura, SIMP from a strong U(1) gauge theory with a monopole condensation, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 055035 [1606.01628]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Simply split SIMPs

    N. Bernal, X. Chu and J. Pradler, Simply split strongly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 115023 [1702.04906]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Enabling Forbidden Dark Matter

    J.M. Cline, H. Liu, T. Slatyer and W. Xue, Enabling Forbidden Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 083521 [1702.07716]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Cosmic abundances of SIMP dark matter

    S.-M. Choi, H.M. Lee and M.-S. Seo, Cosmic abundances of SIMP dark matter, JHEP04 (2017) 154 [1702.07860]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Phenomenology of ELDER Dark Matter

    E. Kuflik, M. Perelstein, N.R.-L. Lorier and Y.-D. Tsai, Phenomenology of ELDER Dark Matter, JHEP08(2017) 078 [1706.05381]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Hidden strongly interacting massive particles

    M. Heikinheimo, K. Tuominen and K. Langæble, Hidden strongly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 095040 [1803.07518]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Resolving phenomenological problems with strongly-interacting-massive-particle models with dark vector resonances

    S.-M. Choi, H.M. Lee, P. Ko and A. Natale, Resolving phenomenological problems with strongly-interacting-massive-particle models with dark vector resonances, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 015034 [1801.07726]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    SIMPs through the axion portal

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, R. Mcgehee, H. Murayama and K. Schutz, Strongly interacting massive particles through the axion portal, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 115031 [1806.10139]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Self-interacting dark matter without prejudice

    N. Bernal, X. Chu, S. Kulkarni and J. Pradler, Self-interacting dark matter without prejudice, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 055044 [1912.06681]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Vector SIMP dark matter with approximate custodial symmetry

    S.-M. Choi, H.M. Lee, Y. Mambrini and M. Pierre, Vector SIMP dark matter with approximate custodial symmetry, JHEP07(2019) 049 [1904.04109]. – 31 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    A. Katz, E. Salvioni and B. Shakya, Split SIMPs with Decays, JHEP10(2020) 049 [2006.15148]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Co-SIMP Miracle

    J. Smirnov and J.F. Beacom, New Freezeout Mechanism for Strongly Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 131301 [2002.04038]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Dark Matter Freeze-out via Catalyzed Annihilation

    C.-Y. Xing and S.-H. Zhu, Dark Matter Freeze-Out via Catalyzed Annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 061101 [2102.02447]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    SIMPly add a dark photon

    P. Braat and M. Postma, SIMPly add a dark photon, JHEP03(2023) 216 [2301.04513]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Dark matter relic density in strongly interacting dark sectors with light vector mesons

    E. Bernreuther, N. Hemme, F. Kahlhoefer and S. Kulkarni, Dark matter relic density in strongly interacting dark sectors with light vector mesons,2311.17157

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Dark QCD Matters

    R. Garani, M. Redi and A. Tesi, Dark QCD matters, JHEP12(2021) 139 [2105.03429]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Axion-Like Electrophilic Portal for Pion Dark Matter

    V. Fiorentino, J.-H. Guo, G. Landini and F. Mescia, Axionlike electrophilic portal for pion dark matter, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 095015 [2602.02678]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Crewther, P

    R.J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano and E. Witten, Chiral Estimate of the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B88(1979) 123

    work page 1979

  29. [29]

    Baluni, CP Violating Effects in QCD, Phys

    V. Baluni, CP Violating Effects in QCD, Phys. Rev. D19(1979) 2227

    work page 1979

  30. [30]

    Chiral Perturbation Theory

    A. Pich, Chiral perturbation theory, Rept. Prog. Phys.58(1995) 563 [hep-ph/9502366]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  31. [31]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493

    work page 1980

  32. [32]

    Axion-like particle assisted strongly interacting massive particle

    A. Kamada, H. Kim and T. Sekiguchi, Axionlike particle assisted strongly interacting massive particle, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 016007 [1704.04505]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Dark matter in QCD-like theories with a theta vacuum: cosmological and astrophysical implications

    C. Garcia-Cely, G. Landini and ´O. Zapata, Dark matter in QCD-like theories with a theta vacuum: Cosmological and astrophysical implications, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063044 [2405.10367]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Pion dark matter in a $\theta$ vacuum: a thermal relic with sharp velocity-dependent self-interactions

    C. Garcia-Cely, G. Landini, L. Marsili and O. Zapata, Pion dark matter in aθvacuum: a thermal relic with sharp velocity-dependent self-interactions,2508.21121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Dark matter self-interactions from a general spin-0 mediator

    F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and S. Wild, Dark matter self-interactions from a general spin-0 mediator, JCAP08(2017) 003 [1704.02149]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Systematizing the Effective Theory of Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    P. Agrawal, A. Parikh and M. Reece, Systematizing the Effective Theory of Self-Interacting Dark Matter, JHEP10(2020) 191 [2003.00021]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter

    D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt, Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  38. [38]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure, Phys. Rept.730(2018) 1 [1705.02358]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Adhikari et al., Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions, Rev

    S. Adhikari et al., Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys.97 (2025) 045004 [2207.10638]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys

    B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 196

    work page 1986

  41. [41]

    Accidental Composite Dark Matter

    O. Antipin, M. Redi, A. Strumia and E. Vigiani, Accidental Composite Dark Matter, JHEP 07(2015) 039 [1503.08749]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Tasi 2009 lectures: The Higgs as a Composite Nambu-Goldstone Boson

    R. Contino, The Higgs as a Composite Nambu-Goldstone Boson, in Theoretical Advanced – 32 – Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Physics of the Large and the Small, pp. 235–306, 2011, DOI [1005.4269]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Dark matter shifts away from direct detection

    R. Balkin, M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Weiler, Dark matter shifts away from direct detection, JCAP11(2018) 050 [1809.09106]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Blast from the past: Constraints on the dark sector from the BEBC WA66 beam dump experiment

    G. Marocco and S. Sarkar, Blast from the past: Constraints on the dark sector from the BEBC WA66 beam dump experiment, SciPost Phys.10(2021) 043 [2011.08153]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Blast from the past II: Constraints on heavy neutral leptons from the BEBC WA66 beam dump experiment

    R. Barouki, G. Marocco and S. Sarkar, Blast from the past II: Constraints on heavy neutral leptons from the BEBC WA66 beam dump experiment, SciPost Phys.13(2022) 118 [2208.00416]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Constraints from the CHARM experiment on Heavy Neutral Leptons with tau mixing

    I. Boiarska, A. Boyarsky, O. Mikulenko and M. Ovchynnikov, Constraints from the CHARM experiment on heavy neutral leptons with tau mixing, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 095019 [2107.14685]. [47]NA62collaboration, Search for dark photon decays toµ +µ− at NA62, JHEP09(2023) 035 [2303.08666]. [48]NA62collaboration, Search for Leptonic Decays of Dark Photons at NA62,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Blumlein et al., Limits on neutral light scalar and pseudoscalar particles in a proton beam dump experiment, Z

    J. Blumlein et al., Limits on neutral light scalar and pseudoscalar particles in a proton beam dump experiment, Z. Phys. C51(1991) 341

    work page 1991

  48. [48]

    Gravothermal evolution of dark matter halos with differential elastic scattering

    D. Yang and H.-B. Yu, Gravothermal evolution of dark matter halos with differential elastic scattering, JCAP09(2022) 077 [2205.03392]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Review of asymmetric dark matter

    K. Petraki and R.R. Volkas, Review of asymmetric dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28 (2013) 1330028 [1305.4939]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter interacting via a Yukawa potential

    K. Petraki, M. Postma and J. de Vries, Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter interacting via a Yukawa potential, JHEP04(2017) 077 [1611.01394]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Mott, The Collision between Two Electrons, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A126(1930) 259

    N.F. Mott, The Collision between Two Electrons, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A126(1930) 259

    work page 1930

  52. [52]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshits, Quantum Mechanics, vol. v.3 of Course of Theoretical Physics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1991)

    work page 1991

  53. [53]

    X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely and H. Murayama, A Practical and Consistent Parametrization of Dark Matter Self-Interactions, JCAP06(2020) 043 [1908.06067]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek, Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 115007 [1302.3898]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [55]

    The Semi-Classical Regime for Dark Matter Self-Interactions

    B. Colquhoun, S. Heeba, F. Kahlhoefer, L. Sagunski and S. Tulin, Semiclassical regime for dark matter self-interactions, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 035006 [2011.04679]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, The Structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J.462(1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  57. [57]

    A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J.490(1997) 493 [astro-ph/9611107]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  58. [58]

    The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters

    D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor and E. Tittley, The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters, Science347(2015) 1462 [1503.07675]. – 33 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Constraining self-interacting dark matter with scaling laws of observed halo surface densities

    K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, T. Bringmann and A. Sokolenko, Constraining self-interacting dark matter with scaling laws of observed halo surface densities, JCAP04(2018) 049 [1712.06602]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Observable tests of self-interacting dark matter in galaxy clusters: BCG wobbles in a constant density core

    D. Harvey, A. Robertson, R. Massey and I.G. McCarthy, Observable tests of self-interacting dark matter in galaxy clusters: BCG wobbles in a constant density core, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488(2019) 1572 [1812.06981]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Velocity-dependent Self-interacting Dark Matter from Groups and Clusters of Galaxies

    L. Sagunski, S. Gad-Nasr, B. Colquhoun, A. Robertson and S. Tulin, Velocity-dependent Self-interacting Dark Matter from Groups and Clusters of Galaxies, JCAP01(2021) 024 [2006.12515]. [64]DEScollaboration, Examining the self-interaction of dark matter through central cluster galaxy offsets, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.529(2024) 52 [2304.10128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Yu, Core-Collapsed SIDM Halos as the Common Origin of Dense Perturbers in Lenses, Streams, and Satellites, Phys

    H.-B. Yu, Core-Collapsed SIDM Halos as the Common Origin of Dense Perturbers in Lenses, Streams, and Satellites, Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 141001 [2510.11006]

    work page arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Vegetti, S.D.M

    S. Vegetti, S.D.M. White, J.P. McKean, D.M. Powell, C. Spingola, D. Massari et al., A possible challenge for cold and warm dark matter, Nature Astron.10(2026) 440 [2601.02466]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Little Dark Dot

    S. Li et al., The “Little Dark Dot”: Evidence for Self-interacting Dark Matter in the Strong Lens SDSS J0946+1006?, Astrophys. J.994(2025) 201 [2504.11800]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Bethe, Theory of the Effective Range in Nuclear Scattering, Phys

    H.A. Bethe, Theory of the Effective Range in Nuclear Scattering, Phys. Rev.76(1949) 38

    work page 1949

  66. [66]

    Self-interacting dark baryons

    J.M. Cline and C. Perron, Self-interacting dark baryons, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 083514 [2204.00033]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Dark-Matter Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments

    K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R.R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 083501 [astro-ph/0406355]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  68. [68]

    Electric Dipole Moments From Dark Sectors

    S. Okawa, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Electric Dipole Moments From Dark Sectors, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 075017 [1905.05219]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    Electromagnetic properties of dark matter: dipole moments and charge form factor

    V. Barger, W.-Y. Keung and D. Marfatia, Electromagnetic properties of dark matter: Dipole moments and charge form factor, Phys. Lett. B696(2011) 74 [1007.4345]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  70. [70]

    Direct Detection of Dark Matter Electromagnetic Dipole Moments

    T. Banks, J.-F. Fortin and S. Thomas, Direct Detection of Dark Matter Electromagnetic Dipole Moments,1007.5515

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Direct detection of Light Anapole and Magnetic Dipole DM

    E. Del Nobile, G.B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh, Direct detection of Light Anapole and Magnetic Dipole DM, JCAP06(2014) 002 [1401.4508]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Dark matter electromagnetic dipoles: the WIMP expectation

    T. Hambye and X.-J. Xu, Dark matter electromagnetic dipoles: the WIMP expectation, JHEP11(2021) 156 [2106.01403]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Kuwahara, J.-C

    T. Kuwahara, J.-C. Wang and S.-R. Yuan, Direct Detection and Cosmological Constraints of Dark Matter with Dark Dipoles,2602.06861

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press (6, 2005), 10.1017/CBO9781139644167

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644167 2005

  75. [75]

    Low energy analysis of the nucleon electromagnetic form factors

    B. Kubis and U.-G. Meissner, Low-energy analysis of the nucleon electromagnetic form-factors, Nucl. Phys. A679(2001) 698 [hep-ph/0007056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  76. [76]

    A Chiral Perturbation Theory Primer

    S. Scherer and M.R. Schindler, A Chiral perturbation theory primer,hep-ph/0505265. – 34 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    Chiral Perturbation Theory Analysis of the Baryon Magnetic Moments

    E.E. Jenkins, M.E. Luke, A.V. Manohar and M.J. Savage, Chiral perturbation theory analysis of the baryon magnetic moments, Phys. Lett. B302(1993) 482 [hep-ph/9212226]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  78. [78]

    Chiral perturbation theory analysis of the baryon magnetic moments revisited

    L. Durand and P. Ha, Chiral perturbation theory analysis of the baryon magnetic moments revisited, Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 013010 [hep-ph/9712492]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  79. [79]

    Pich and E

    A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Strong CP violation in an effective chiral Lagrangian approach, Nucl. Phys. B367(1991) 313

    work page 1991

  80. [80]

    The anapole form factor of the nucleon

    C.M. Maekawa and U. van Kolck, The Anapole form-factor of the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B 478(2000) 73 [hep-ph/0006161]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

Showing first 80 references.