Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Kinetic Theory of Quasiparticles, Retarded Correlators and Hydrodynamics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Finite particle mass turns the propagating sound mode of a massive relativistic gas into a purely imaginary, dissipative mode.

desk verdict A serious analytic extension of RTA kinetic theory to massive particles, but the headline sound-mode claim likely depends on an untested order of limits. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14591 v2 pith:775CFY7K submitted 2025-04-20 nucl-th hep-phhep-th

Ali Hataei , Roya Heydari , Farid Taghinavaz This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-phhep-th
keywords relativistickinetictheoryrelaxationtimeapproximationretardedGreen'sfunctionsquasiparticleshydrodynamicmodessoundchannelbranchcutbulkviscosity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that giving the particles in a relaxation-time-approximation Boltzmann gas a finite rest mass qualitatively changes its collective dynamics. Working with a constant mass profile and a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium distribution, the authors derive the retarded two-point correlation functions for charge and energy-momentum currents and study their poles and branch cuts at small and large mass-to-temperature ratio $x=m/T$. The central result is that in the sound channel the usual propagating sound mode disappears: finite mass converts it into a purely imaginary, dissipative mode, while the shear channel keeps modes matching the massless results asymptotically. The paper also extracts transport coefficients, including bulk and shear viscosity and third-order corrections, as expansions in $x$. If correct, this gives a concrete microscopic model in which the presence of a mass scale alone reshapes the hydrodynamic spectrum.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the set of retarded two-point functions obtained from the linearized Boltzmann equation by the variational method: the response of the induced current and stress tensor to weak metric and gauge perturbations. Poles of these correlators define the collective modes, and logarithmic terms of the form $\ln\!\left(\frac{\omega-kv+i/\tau_{\rm eq}}{\omega+kv+i/\tau_{\rm eq}}\right)$ integrated over the massive Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution generate both the branch cuts and the hydrodynamic denominators. The analysis proceeds by expanding those integrals in $x=m/T$ before taking the small-$(\omega,k)$ limit, which produces explicit dispersion relations and the transport coefficients.

What would settle it

Evaluate the sound-channel pole condition $D_{\rm sound}(\omega,k,x)=0$ at fixed finite $x$ (say $x=0.1$) directly in small $k$ without first expanding in $x$; if the lowest pole has a real part proportional to $k$, the claimed conversion of propagating sound into a purely imaginary mode fails. The same test can be done by numerically extracting the spectral function peak of $G_{00,00}$ at finite $x$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that for a massive relativistic gas in the relaxation-time approximation the retarded energy-momentum correlator in the sound channel has only purely imaginary poles at small momentum. Expanding around $x=m/T$, the three lowest poles are $\omega_1 \simeq \frac{8 i k^2 \tau_{\rm eq}}{x^6}(\gamma_E-\ln 2)$, $\omega_2 \simeq -\frac{i}{\tau_{\rm eq}} - i k^2 \tau_{\rm eq}\left(\frac{4}{15}-\frac{x^2}{45}\right)$, and $\omega_3 \simeq \frac{i x^6(\gamma_E-\ln 2)}{24\tau_{\rm eq}}$ plus higher-order terms; none has a real part linear in $k$, so the mode that would be propagating sound in the massless limit becomes dissipative. The same expansion yields shear-channel modes that reduce to the massless spectrum, a logarithmic branch cut between $\omega=k$ and $\omega=-k$ in the weak-coupling limit, and hydrodynamic poles above this cut in the strong-coupling regime below a critical $k\tau_{\rm eq}$. Transport coefficients are then computed by matching the low-frequency correlators to the hydrodynamic Kubo relations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the expansion in $x=m/T$ can be performed before the small-momentum hydrodynamic limit and that these two limits commute.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a massive Maxwell-Boltzmann gas in the relaxation-time approximation, sound-channel hydrodynamic modes do not propagate: all three lowest poles are purely imaginary, so a density perturbation decays without oscillating.
  • Shear-channel modes asymptotically approach their massless counterparts, so the mass changes only coefficients, not the qualitative structure, in that channel.
  • The logarithmic branch cut between $\omega=k$ and $\omega=-k$ persists for massive particles, and hydrodynamic poles appear above the cut in the strong-coupling regime only below a critical $k\tau_{\rm eq}$.
  • The computed transport coefficients, including a bulk viscosity that starts at $O(x^4)$ for small $x$, provide concrete massive corrections to standard massless relaxation-time-approximation results.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper expands in $x$ before taking the hydrodynamic limit; if the two limits do not commute, the true poles at finite small $x$ could retain a real part proportional to $k$, restoring propagating sound. The singular coefficients $1/x^6$ and $x^6$ in Eq. (67) make this a concrete alternative to check.
  • One could settle the question numerically by solving the full pole condition for $x$ around $0.1$ without the $x$-expansion; a nonzero $\operatorname{Re}\omega \propto k$ at fixed small $x$ would contradict the claim.
  • If the claim holds, quasiparticle models with a running mass, such as those used near a chiral critical point, would exhibit a qualitative change in hydrodynamic mode structure at the mass scale, with consequences for how long hydrodynamics remains valid.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the linearized relaxation-time-approximation (RTA) Boltzmann equation for a massive Maxwell-Boltzmann gas with constant mass m. Using a variational approach, it derives retarded charge and energy-momentum correlators at arbitrary (ω,k), then expands in small and large x = m/T. It reports diffusion constants, shear and bulk viscosities, third-order transport coefficients, and hydrodynamic mode spectra. The main novel claim is that in the sound channel a finite mass removes the propagating sound pole and replaces it with purely imaginary modes.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, the paper is a useful first analytic treatment of massive RTA correlators: it provides explicit expressions, satisfies the relevant Ward identities, and connects to known massless results in limiting cases. The transport-coefficient extraction against the third-order hydrodynamic ansatz of [56] is a strong external check. However, the headline sound-channel conclusion depends critically on an assumption about commuting the x→0 and k→0 limits, and that assumption is not tested; the paper's own closing sentence identifies the numerical evaluation that would settle the issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (67)] The conclusion that finite mass converts propagating sound into purely imaginary modes is extracted from the small-x expansion of the sound denominator performed before the small-k hydrodynamic limit. The roots in Eq. (67), ω1 ~ 8ik²τ/(x⁶(γ_E−ln2)) and ω3 ~ ix⁶(γ_E−ln2)/(24τ) + 8ik²τ/(x⁶(ln2−γ_E)), are non-uniform in x: they diverge as x→0 at fixed k, so the two limits do not commute. The paper does not demonstrate that these roots describe poles of the full correlator for small finite x, and the numerical confirmation in Fig. 5 uses the same x-expanded expression, so it is not an independent check. A fixed-x numerical evaluation of the original momentum integrals, as suggested in the conclusion, or a controlled double-scaling analysis is required before the abstract's claim can be supported.
  2. [Section IV, Eqs. (63) and (57)] The bulk viscosity formula in Eq. (63) and the large-x third-order transport coefficients in Eq. (57) are presented after 'some computations' without derivation. These are load-bearing quantitative results of the transport section; without intermediate steps or an appendix reproducing the calculation, the results are not verifiable. The authors should provide the derivation or a reproducible algebraic outline.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (23)] The expansion of (1/v) ln[(ω−kv+i/τ)/(ω+kv+i/τ)] is an expansion in x/|p|, and its correction terms contain denominators such as ((1−iτeqω)²+k²τeq²) that vanish in the hydrodynamic limit. Using this expansion before taking k→0 can generate spurious poles of order 1/x⁶, which is the same non-commutativity issue identified in the first comment. The paper should state the intended ordering of limits and justify it explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (2) and (9)] The equilibrium distribution in Eq. (2), feq = exp[(gαβ p^α u^β + μ)/T], appears to have the opposite sign from Eq. (9), feq = exp[−(p0−μ0)/T]. For the chosen metric signature and u=(1,0,0,0), these expressions are inconsistent; please clarify the intended sign convention.
  2. [Introduction] The Introduction states 'in the weak coupling regime (τeqT→∞)' and 'in the strong coupling regime (τeqT→∞)' with the same arrow; the strong-coupling limit should presumably be τeqT→0.
  3. [Section II, after Eq. (4)] The sentence 'the first term on the right-hand side does not contribute' refers to the electromagnetic force, but the mass-gradient term M∂^α M also vanishes for constant mass; this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Section IV, Eqs. (52) and (55)] The notation τ and τeq is used interchangeably in these equations; please standardize the relaxation-time symbol throughout Section IV.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the derivation is self-contained from the RTA Boltzmann equation, with transport coefficients matched to an external third-order hydrodynamic ansatz and no fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: retarded correlators are computed from the linearized massive RTA Boltzmann equation (Eqs. (13)-(43)); hydrodynamic modes are obtained as poles of those correlators (Eqs. (67), (70), (73), (76)); and transport coefficients are extracted by matching the low-frequency limit of the kinetic-theory correlators to the standard hydrodynamic expansion Eq. (51), which is taken from the independent reference [56]. No parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted, and no target result is assumed as an input. The massless limit [27] is used only as a consistency check, not as a load-bearing premise, and no self-citation appears in the argument. The small-x expansion before the small-k limit, which makes the sound-channel roots in Eq. (67) singular as x to 0, is a possible correctness or convergence concern about the order of limits, but it is not a circularity: the roots are obtained from the displayed denominator by expansion, not from the conclusion. The paper is therefore a normal non-circular calculation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model inputs are physical (T, m, tau_eq) and no parameters are fitted to data. The load-bearing additional assumption is the commutativity of the small-mass and small-momentum limits, which is not justified in the text. No new particles or fields are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The collision term is the Anderson-Witting relaxation-time approximation with a single constant relaxation time tau_eq.
    The entire calculation is built on Eq. (1); the physical validity of RTA for the QGP is an input, not derived.
  • domain assumption The equilibrium distribution is Maxwell-Boltzmann with zero background chemical potential.
    Eq. (9); classical statistics are chosen and quantum degeneracy is neglected.
  • domain assumption The mass profile is constant and the force term from a varying mass is dropped.
    Eq. (4) and the text 'we assume constant mass values'; varying-mass effects are deferred.
  • domain assumption Contact terms from the sqrt(-g) in the variational definition are neglected.
    After Eq. (8), the paper states contact terms are neglected; these are polynomial in omega,k and do not affect poles.
  • ad hoc to paper The x-expansion and the small-k expansion commute; pole equations from the x-expanded correlators represent the true hydrodynamic poles.
    Section IV, Eq. (65)-(67); this is the weakest assumption and is not tested. The singular x^{-6}/x^6 behavior of omega_1 and omega_3 signals a non-uniform limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kinetic Theory of Quasiparticles, Retarded Correlators and Hydrodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/775CFY7K

@misc{pith2026250414591,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kinetic Theory of Quasiparticles, Retarded Correlators and Hydrodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/775CFY7K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14591}
}
abstract

Within the relaxation time approximation under a constant mass profile, we investigate the collective dynamics of a system of massive relativistic particles described by the Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium distribution. We analytically derive the two-point retarded correlation functions for both charge and energy-momentum tensor components at arbitrary momentum and frequency. We expand our results in the limits of very small and very large mass-to-temperature ratios ($m/T$). Similar to the massless case, we identify a critical threshold in ($k \tau$) below which the correlators permit physical solutions. This behavior arises from a logarithmic branch cut in the spectral function. At higher momenta, solutions emerge significantly below this cut, corresponding to non-hydrodynamic modes. Our analysis demonstrates that hydrodynamic poles dominate in the strong coupling regime, while the weak coupling regime features a logarithmic branch cut extending along $\omega = k$ and $\omega = -k$. Notably, in the sound channel, finite mass modifies the standard propagating sound mode, converting it into a purely imaginary mode. In contrast, the shear channel exhibits modes that asymptotically converge to their massless counterparts. Additionally, we compute the transport coefficients for shear and bulk viscosity, along with higher-order gradient corrections up to third order, expressed as perturbative expansions in both the small and large ($m/T$) regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14591 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Left: the trace anomaly parameter Θ as given in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Diffusive hydro modes for different cases. Left: pole structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison between hydro poles for massless and massive cases in the charge correlation functions. In each figure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between hydro poles for massless and massive cases in the sound channel. Conventions are similar to Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Sketch of poles for large massive particles in the charge correlation function. Massless poles are indicated with a cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Structure of poles for large massive particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Relaxation for massive particles: transport and causality

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper derives closed-form mass-dependent transport coefficients for massive RTA gases and proposes that the discontinuity across the correlator cut defines an effective lightcone velocity.

  2. Order-reversed Kubo formulas in relativistic kinetic theory

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In a simplified relativistic gas model, eight alternative Kubo formulas for viscosity give identical values, supporting the new order-of-limits method.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [56]

    CHIRALLY INVARIANT TRANSPORT EQUATIONS FOR QUARK MATTER

    W. Florkowski, J. Hufner, S. P. Klevansky, and L. Neise, “Chirally invariant transport equations for quark matter,” Annals Phys. 245 (1996) 445–463, hep-ph/9505407

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  2. [1]

    Notably, the latter relations are also satisfied for the massless case as well [27]. After some algebraic manipulations, we get the following relations for energy-momentum tensor perturbations δT 00 = c ac−b2c2s E0 + b ac−b2c2s E3, δT 03 = bc 2 s ac−b2c2s E0 + a ac−b2c2s E3, (45) δT 0i =−τeq d Z dp 2π2T0 p2p2 0feq(p) Γ0 0i(ω,⃗k)I4(v,ω,k ) iτeqω + Γ0 3i(ω,...

    work page

  3. [2]

    (x 2 )n Z ∞ 1 dz (z2− 1)n− 1 2 e−zx, Kn+1(x) = √π Γ(n + 1

    work page

  4. [3]

    Flow at the SPS and RHIC as a quark gluon plasma signature,

    D. Teaney, J. Lauret, and E. V. Shuryak, “Flow at the SPS and RHIC as a quark gluon plasma signature,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 4783–4786, nucl-th/0011058

    arXiv 2001

  5. [4]

    (x 2 )n Z ∞ 1 dzz (z2− 1)n− 1 2 e−zx, − 1 x ∂ ∂x m (xnKn(x)) =xn−mKn−m(x), − 1 x ∂ ∂x m Kn(x) xn = Kn+m(x) xn+m , Kn+1(x) =Kn−1(x) + 2n x Kn(x), ∂Kn(x) ∂x =−Kn−1(x) +Kn+1(x) 2 . (A1) 20 ⨯ ⨯ ⨯ -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 ● ● ● ● ● ● -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -0.0025 -0.0020 -0.0015 -0.0010 -0.0005 0.0000 ⨯ ⨯ ⨯ -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1....

    work page

  6. [5]

    Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration,

    PHENIX Collaboration, K. Adcox et al. , “Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration,” Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 184–283, nucl-ex/0410003

    arXiv 2005

  7. [6]

    New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC,

    M. Gyulassy and L. McLerran, “New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC,” Nucl. Phys. A 750 (2005) 30–63, nucl-th/0405013

    arXiv 2005

  8. [7]

    Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC,

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al. , “Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC,” Phys. Lett. B 765 (2017) 193–220, 1606.06198

    arXiv 2017

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    The Quark gluon plasma in equilibrium,

    D. H. Rischke, “The Quark gluon plasma in equilibrium,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52 (2004) 197–296, nucl-th/0305030

    2004 arXiv

  2. [9]

    What RHIC experiments and theory tell us about properties of quark-gluon plasma?,

    E. V. Shuryak, “What RHIC experiments and theory tell us about properties of quark-gluon plasma?,” Nucl. Phys. A 750 (2005) 64–83, hep-ph/0405066

    2005 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Observation of Long-Range Near-Side Angular Correlations in Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC,

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al. , “Observation of Long-Range Near-Side Angular Correlations in Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC,” JHEP 09 (2010) 091, 1009.4122

    2010 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Rezzolla and O

    L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti, Relativistic Hydrodynamics. Oxford University Press, 9, 2013

    2013

  5. [12]

    Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,

    P. Kovtun, “Lectures on hydrodynamic fluctuations in relativistic theories,” J. Phys. A 45 (2012) 473001, 1205.5040

    2012 arXiv

  6. [13]

    New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era,

    W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, and M. Spalinski, “New theories of relativistic hydrodynamics in the LHC era,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018), no. 4, 046001, 1707.02282. 24

    2018 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2019

    2019

  8. [15]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions,

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, “Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 (2018) 339–376, 1802.04801

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions,

    J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Noronha, and M. Gyulassy, “The unreasonable effectiveness of hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions,” Nucl. Phys. A 956 (2016) 890–893, 1512.07135

    2016 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Hydrodynamic flow in small systems or: “How the heck is it possible that a system emitting only a dozen particles can be described by fluid dynamics?

    U. W. Heinz and J. S. Moreland, “Hydrodynamic flow in small systems or: “How the heck is it possible that a system emitting only a dozen particles can be described by fluid dynamics?”,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1271 (2019), no. 1, 012018, 1904.06592

    2019 arXiv

  11. [18]

    One fluid to rule them all: viscous hydrodynamic description of event-by-event central p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions at √s = 5.02 TeV,

    R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke, “One fluid to rule them all: viscous hydrodynamic description of event-by-event central p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions at √s = 5.02 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 351–356, 1701.07145

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 081601, hep-th/0104066

    2001 arXiv

  13. [20]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, hep-th/9711200

    1998 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183–386, hep-th/9905111

    2000 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, “Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 111601, hep-th/0405231

    2005 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Quasinormal modes and holography,

    P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes and holography,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 086009, hep-th/0506184

    2005 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography,

    R. Baier, P. Romatschke, D. T. Son, A. O. Starinets, and M. A. Stephanov, “Relativistic viscous hydrodynamics, conformal invariance, and holography,” JHEP 04 (2008) 100, 0712.2451

    2008 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Energy loss of a heavy quark moving through N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,

    C. P. Herzog, A. Karch, P. Kovtun, C. Kozcaz, and L. G. Yaffe, “Energy loss of a heavy quark moving through N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,” JHEP 07 (2006) 013, hep-th/0605158

    2006 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Heavy quark diffusion in strongly coupled N=4 Yang-Mills,

    J. Casalderrey-Solana and D. Teaney, “Heavy quark diffusion in strongly coupled N=4 Yang-Mills,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 085012, hep-ph/0605199

    2006 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Retarded correlators in kinetic theory: branch cuts, poles and hydrodynamic onset transitions,

    P. Romatschke, “Retarded correlators in kinetic theory: branch cuts, poles and hydrodynamic onset transitions,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016), no. 6, 352, 1512.02641

    2016 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Calculating the jet quenching parameter from AdS/CFT,

    H. Liu, K. Rajagopal, and U. A. Wiedemann, “Calculating the jet quenching parameter from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 182301, hep-ph/0605178

    2006 arXiv

  22. [29]

    W. A. De Groot, S. R. Van Leeuwen and C. G. Van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Applications . North-Holland Publishing Company, 1980

    1980

  23. [30]

    Thermal Equilibration in Ultra-Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collision,

    G. Baym, “Thermal Equilibration in Ultra-Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collision,” Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984) 18–22

    1984

  24. [31]

    New insights into the analytic structure of correlation functions via kinetic theory,

    R. Brants, “New insights into the analytic structure of correlation functions via kinetic theory,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 11, 116027, 2409.09022

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Analytic structure of nonhydrodynamic modes in kinetic theory,

    A. Kurkela and U. A. Wiedemann, “Analytic structure of nonhydrodynamic modes in kinetic theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019), no. 9, 776, 1712.04376

    2019 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Spectra of correlators in the relaxation time approximation of kinetic theory,

    M. Bajec, S. Grozdanov, and A. Soloviev, “Spectra of correlators in the relaxation time approximation of kinetic theory,” JHEP 08 (2024) 065, 2403.17769

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Three-point functions from a Schwinger-Keldysh effective action, resummed in derivatives,

    N. Abbasi and D. H. Rischke, “Three-point functions from a Schwinger-Keldysh effective action, resummed in derivatives,” 2410.07929

    arXiv

  28. [35]

    A fully relativistic lattice Boltzmann algorithm,

    P. Romatschke, M. Mendoza, and S. Succi, “A fully relativistic lattice Boltzmann algorithm,” Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 034903, 1106.1093

    2011 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Hydrodynamic and non-hydrodynamic excitations in kinetic theory — a numerical analysis in scalar field theory,

    S. Ochsenfeld and S. Schlichting, “Hydrodynamic and non-hydrodynamic excitations in kinetic theory — a numerical analysis in scalar field theory,” JHEP 09 (2023) 186, 2308.04491

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Hydrodynamization and nonequilibrium Green’s functions in kinetic theory,

    S. Kamata, M. Martinez, P. Plaschke, S. Ochsenfeld, and S. Schlichting, “Hydrodynamization and nonequilibrium Green’s functions in kinetic theory,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 5, 056003, 2004.06751

    2020 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Towards the BBGKY hierarchy: a scheme beyond the Boltzmann equation and application to a weakly confined QCD gas,

    S. Grozdanov and A. Soloviev, “Towards the BBGKY hierarchy: a scheme beyond the Boltzmann equation and application to a weakly confined QCD gas,” 2501.00099

    arXiv

  32. [39]

    Collective flow in single-hit QCD kinetic theory,

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. T¨ ornkvist, “Collective flow in single-hit QCD kinetic theory,” JHEP 11 (2021) 216, 2104.08179

    2021 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Flow in AA and pA as an interplay of fluid-like and non-fluid like excitations,

    A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, “Flow in AA and pA as an interplay of fluid-like and non-fluid like excitations,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019), no. 11, 965, 1905.05139

    2019 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Opacity dependence of elliptic flow in kinetic theory,

    A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, “Opacity dependence of elliptic flow in kinetic theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019), no. 9, 759, 1805.04081

    2019 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Hydrodynamization in systems with detailed transverse profiles,

    A. Kurkela, S. F. Taghavi, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, “Hydrodynamization in systems with detailed transverse profiles,” Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135901, 2007.06851

    2020 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Development of transverse flow at small and large opacities in conformal kinetic theory,

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, “Development of transverse flow at small and large opacities in conformal kinetic theory,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 1, 014031, 2109.03290

    2022 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Smallest QCD droplet and multiparticle correlations in p-p collisions,

    S. F. Taghavi, “Smallest QCD droplet and multiparticle correlations in p-p collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 104 (2021), no. 5, 054906, 1907.12140

    2021 arXiv

  38. [45]

    +O(k4), ω3 = ix6(γE− ln 2) 24τeq + 8ik2τeq x6(ln 2−γE) +O(k4), (67) where γE = 0.5772 is the Euler number. The massless limit of the pole ω2 continuously merges into the known result [27], but the massless limit of the other two poles, namely ω1 and ω3, is different from the a...

  39. [46]

    Opacity dependence of transverse flow, preequilibrium, and applicability of hydrodynamics in heavy-ion collisions,

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, “Opacity dependence of transverse flow, preequilibrium, and applicability of hydrodynamics in heavy-ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 9, 094013, 2211.14379

    2023 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Establishing the Range of Applicability of Hydrodynamics in 25 High-Energy Collisions,

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, “Establishing the Range of Applicability of Hydrodynamics in 25 High-Energy Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 15, 152301, 2211.14356

    2023 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Collective dynamics in heavy and light-ion collisions – I) Kinetic Theory vs. Hydrodynamics,

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, “Collective dynamics in heavy and light-ion collisions – I) Kinetic Theory vs. Hydrodynamics,” 2411.19708

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Collective dynamics in heavy and light-ion collisions – II) Determining the origin of collective behavior in high-energy collisions,

    V. E. Ambrus, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann, “Collective dynamics in heavy and light-ion collisions – II) Determining the origin of collective behavior in high-energy collisions,” 2411.19709

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    Revealing the harmonic structure of nuclear two-body correlations in high-energy heavy-ion collisions,

    T. Duguet, G. Giacalone, S. Jeon, and A. Tichai, “Revealing the harmonic structure of nuclear two-body correlations in high-energy heavy-ion collisions,” 2504.02481

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    Quasiparticle second-order viscous hydrodynamics from kinetic theory,

    L. Tinti, A. Jaiswal, and R. Ryblewski, “Quasiparticle second-order viscous hydrodynamics from kinetic theory,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 5, 054007, 1612.07329

    2017 arXiv

  45. [52]

    From moments of the distribution function to hydrodynamics: The nonconformal case,

    S. Jaiswal, J.-P. Blaizot, R. S. Bhalerao, Z. Chen, A. Jaiswal, and L. Yan, “From moments of the distribution function to hydrodynamics: The nonconformal case,” Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022), no. 4, 044912, 2208.02750

    2022 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Transport coefficients of transient hydrodynamics for the hadron-resonance gas and thermal-mass quasiparticle models,

    G. S. Rocha and G. S. Denicol, “Transport coefficients of transient hydrodynamics for the hadron-resonance gas and thermal-mass quasiparticle models,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 9, 096011, 2402.06996

    2024 arXiv

  47. [54]

    A Model for Collision Processes in Gases. 1. Small Amplitude Processes in Charged and Neutral One-Component Systems,

    P. L. Bhatnagar, E. P. Gross, and M. Krook, “A Model for Collision Processes in Gases. 1. Small Amplitude Processes in Charged and Neutral One-Component Systems,” Phys. Rev. 94 (1954) 511–525

    1954

  48. [55]

    A relativistic relaxation-time model for the Boltzmann equation,

    J. L. Anderson and H. R. Witting, “A relativistic relaxation-time model for the Boltzmann equation,” Physica 74 (1974), no. 3, 466–488

    1974

  49. [57]

    Relativistic (Lattice) Boltzmann Equation with Non-Ideal Equation of State,

    P. Romatschke, “Relativistic (Lattice) Boltzmann Equation with Non-Ideal Equation of State,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 065012, 1108.5561

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Exact solution of the (0+1)-dimensional Boltzmann equation for a massive gas,

    W. Florkowski, E. Maksymiuk, R. Ryblewski, and M. Strickland, “Exact solution of the (0+1)-dimensional Boltzmann equation for a massive gas,” Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014), no. 5, 054908, 1402.7348

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Electron dynamics in solids,

    P. Drude, “Electron dynamics in solids,” Annalen der Physik 306 (1900) 566

    1900

  52. [60]

    Constructing higher-order hydrodynamics: The third order,

    S. Grozdanov and N. Kaplis, “Constructing higher-order hydrodynamics: The third order,” Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016), no. 6, 066012, 1507.02461

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativistic scalar field theory,

    S. Jeon, “Hydrodynamic transport coefficients in relativistic scalar field theory,” Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 3591–3642, hep-ph/9409250

    1995 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Jeffrey and H

    A. Jeffrey and H. Dai, Handbook of Mathematical Formulas and Integrals . Academic Press, 2008

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.