Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Small Violations of Statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/9903069 v1 pith:7KYTNZHH submitted 1999-03-19 quant-ph hep-phhep-thnucl-th

Small Violations of Statistics

classification quant-ph hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords statisticsboseboundfermigivesparticlesargumentbosons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

There are two motivations to consider statistics that are neither Bose nor Fermi: (1) to extend the framework of quantum theory and of quantum field theory, and (2) to provide a quantitative measure of possible violations of statistics. After reviewing tests of statistics for various particles, and types of statistics that are neither Bose nor Fermi, I discuss quons, particles characterized by the parameter $q$, which permit a smooth interpolation between Bose and Fermi statistics; $q=1$ gives bosons, $q=-1$ gives fermions. The new result of this talk is work by Robert C. Hilborn and myself that gives a heuristic argument for an extension of conservation of statistics to quons with trilinear couplings of the form $\bar{f}fb$, where $f$ is fermion-like and $b$ is boson-like. We showed that $q_f^2=q_b$. In particular, we related the bound on $q_{\gamma}$ for photons to the bound on $q_e$ for electrons, allowing the very precise bound for electrons to be carried over to photons. An extension of our argument suggests that all particles are fermions or bosons to high precision.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.