REVIEW 1 cited by
Heavy-tailed likelihoods for robustness against data outliers: Applications to the analysis of gravitational wave data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Heavy-tailed likelihoods for robustness against data outliers: Applications to the analysis of gravitational wave data
read the original abstract
In recent years, the field of Gravitational Wave Astronomy has flourished. With the advent of more sophisticated ground-based detectors and space-based observatories, it is anticipated that Gravitational Wave events will be detected at a much higher rate in the near future. One of the future data analysis challenges is performing robust statistical inference in the presence of detector noise transients or non-stationarities, as well as in the presence of stochastic Gravitational Wave signals of possible astrophysical and/or cosmological origin. The incomplete knowledge of the total noise of the observatory can introduce challenges in parameter estimation of detected sources. In this work, we propose a heavy-tailed, Hyperbolic likelihood, based on the Generalized Hyperbolic distribution. With the Hyperbolic likelihood we obtain a robust data analysis framework against data outliers, noise non-stationarities, and possible inaccurate modeling of the noise power spectral density. We apply this methodology to examples drawn from gravitational wave astronomy, and in particular to synthetic data sets from the planned LISA mission.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Gaussian Assumptions: A new robust statistical framework for gravitational-wave data analysis
A heavy-tailed hyperbolic likelihood, applied across the full frequency band, gives gravitational-wave parameter estimates that are as good as standard methods in Gaussian noise and less biased in glitchy or overlappi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.