pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25487 · v1 · pith:CMF6YW6Hnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

A higher-harmonic observable for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions

Han-Sheng Li , Yu-Shan Chang , Yi Yang , Fuqiang Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 19:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex
keywords chiral magnetic effectheavy-ion collisionsazimuthal correlationshexadecapolecharge separationmagnetic field fluctuationselliptic flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

The hexadecapole component of Δγ(φ_pair) isolates the chiral magnetic effect while resisting elliptic flow backgrounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The chiral magnetic effect produces charge separation along the magnetic field direction in heavy-ion collisions, but the standard Δγ correlator is overwhelmed by background correlations that couple to elliptic flow. This paper investigates higher-harmonic terms in the differential version of Δγ plotted against the pair azimuthal angle. Models of heavy-ion collisions show that the hexadecapole term arises from event-by-event magnetic field fluctuations and remains sensitive to the CME while staying largely free of the usual backgrounds. If this holds, experiments gain an observable that does not require background subtraction techniques whose reliability is hard to verify.

Core claim

Event-by-event fluctuations of the magnetic field in both direction and magnitude across the collision zone generate higher-harmonic components in the pair azimuthal correlator difference Δγ(φ_pair). The hexadecapole component of this differential correlator responds to the presence of the chiral magnetic effect and remains insensitive to the particle correlations that produce backgrounds in the conventional measure.

What carries the argument

The hexadecapole (cos 4φ_pair) Fourier component of the differential correlator Δγ(φ_pair), generated by magnetic field fluctuations and used to separate CME signal from flow-induced backgrounds.

If this is right

  • Backgrounds from elliptic flow and local charge conservation that dominate the usual Δγ do not feed into the hexadecapole term.
  • The hexadecapole term remains nonzero only when both chirality imbalance and magnetic fields are present in the models.
  • The observable can be extracted from existing detector data without requiring new hardware or analysis techniques beyond standard pair reconstruction.
  • Direct comparison between data and CME calculations becomes possible without intermediate modeling of flow backgrounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying collision energy or system size would test whether the hexadecapole signal scales with the expected strength of the magnetic field.
  • If the method works, it could reduce dependence on event-shape engineering or other background-suppression techniques whose assumptions are difficult to validate independently.
  • Higher harmonics beyond the hexadecapole might carry additional information on the spatial structure of chirality domains inside the collision zone.

Load-bearing premise

That the heavy-ion collision models can produce and isolate a hexadecapole signal from magnetic field fluctuations without introducing artifacts that mimic or mask the separation from backgrounds.

What would settle it

Experimental data in which the hexadecapole amplitude of Δγ(φ_pair) for opposite-sign pairs equals that for same-sign pairs across centralities where models predict a nonzero CME contribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25487 by Fuqiang Wang, Han-Sheng Li, Yi Yang, Yu-Shan Chang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the ∆γ(ϕpair) distributions for the three sets of calculations by avfd. The n5/s = 0 distribution is symmetric about ϕpair − ΨRP = 0. The other two distributions are asymmetric, and this is because avfd artificially fixes the axial current to be single-signed so that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Pion pair ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Fit parameters to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fit parameters to simulated data by various physics models, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: summarizes the c4/c2 variable from both avfd and background models for the 30–40% centrality of Au+Au collisions. The region enclosed by the dashed lines at ±1% indicates the background range for charged pions suggested by the studied models. The solid points from avfd with finite CME signals are positive. The c4/c2 parameter appears to increase faster than linearly with increasing n5/s, similar to the qua… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The chiral magnetic effect (CME) is a phenomenon in which electric charge is separated by a strong magnetic field from local domains of chirality imbalance in quantum chromodynamics. The CME-sensitive azimuthal correlator difference $\Delta\gamma$ between opposite- and same-sign charged hadron pairs is designed to detect charge separation along the magnetic field, on average perpendicular to the reaction plane. However, the search for the CME is hindered by large background contributions to $\Delta\gamma$ from particle correlations coupled with elliptic flow. In this work, we explore higher-harmonic components in differential $\Delta\gamma(\phi_{\rm pair})$ as a function of the pair azimuthal angle. Such components could arise from event-by-event fluctuations of the magnetic fields throughout the collision zone, in both direction and magnitude. We show by using heavy-ion physics models that the hexadecapole component of $\Delta\gamma(\phi_{\rm pair})$ is sensitive to the CME and insensitive to physics backgrounds. This could offer a unique observable for the CME that is robust against background contributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that higher-harmonic components of the differential correlator Δγ(φ_pair) can isolate the chiral magnetic effect (CME). In particular, event-by-event magnetic-field fluctuations in both direction and magnitude are argued to generate a hexadecapole term that remains sensitive to the CME while being insensitive to the dominant flow-coupled background correlations; this separation is demonstrated through simulations with heavy-ion physics models.

Significance. If the claimed separation holds beyond the specific models employed, the hexadecapole component would constitute a useful new observable for CME searches that is less vulnerable to the elliptic-flow backgrounds that limit the standard Δγ measurement. The manuscript's reliance on explicit model simulations to test sensitivity and insensitivity is a positive feature.

major comments (1)
  1. [model results / simulation section] The central claim that the hexadecapole term is background-insensitive rests on the assumption that the chosen heavy-ion models correctly generate both the magnetic-field fluctuation spectrum and the background pair correlations without introducing correlated artifacts. The manuscript does not report systematic variations (e.g., alternative background implementations or independent changes to the magnetic-field fluctuation spectrum) that would test whether the observed insensitivity is robust or model-specific. This directly affects the load-bearing assertion of background insensitivity.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to “heavy-ion physics models” without naming them; the main text should explicitly list the models and parameter settings used for the magnetic-field and background implementations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment on the robustness of our results. We address the major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the analysis of model dependence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the hexadecapole term is background-insensitive rests on the assumption that the chosen heavy-ion models correctly generate both the magnetic-field fluctuation spectrum and the background pair correlations without introducing correlated artifacts. The manuscript does not report systematic variations (e.g., alternative background implementations or independent changes to the magnetic-field fluctuation spectrum) that would test whether the observed insensitivity is robust or model-specific. This directly affects the load-bearing assertion of background insensitivity.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit systematic variations limits the strength of the background-insensitivity claim. The original simulations employed standard heavy-ion models that incorporate magnetic-field fluctuations and background correlations, but did not vary those inputs independently. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection to the simulation section that performs two classes of tests: (i) alternative background implementations (resonance decays with varied yields and jet-like correlations with different fragmentation parameters) and (ii) independent rescaling and directional randomization of the magnetic-field fluctuation spectrum. The updated figures will demonstrate that the hexadecapole coefficient remains insensitive to these background changes while retaining CME sensitivity. These additions directly address the referee’s concern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claim rests on external model simulations

full rationale

The paper's strongest claim is demonstrated via heavy-ion physics models rather than any mathematical derivation or fit. The abstract states the result is shown 'by using heavy-ion physics models' with no equations or steps that reduce a prediction to its own inputs by construction. No self-definitional relations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; no specific model details or fitting procedures are described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 1098 out tokens · 38857 ms · 2026-06-29T19:49:56.022112+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion col- lisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl.Phys. A803, 227 (2008), arXiv:0711.0950 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    The Chiral Magnetic Effect

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, The chiral magnetic effect, Phys.Rev.D78, 074033 (2008), arXiv:0808.3382 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions

    V. Skokov, A. Yu. Illarionov, and V. Toneev, Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A24, 5925 (2009), arXiv:0907.1396 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [4]

    Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions

    W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev.C85, 044907 (2012), arXiv:1201.5108 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    S. A. Voloshin, Parity violation in hot QCD: How to detect it, Phys.Rev.C70, 057901 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0406311 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Parity violation in hot QCD: why it can happen, and how to look for it

    D. Kharzeev, Parity violation in hot QCD: Why it can happen, and how to look for it, Phys.Lett.B633, 260 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0406125 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Quantifying Chiral Magnetic Effect from Anomalous-Viscous Fluid Dynamics

    Y. Jiang, S. Shi, Y. Yin, and J. Liao, Quantifying the chi- ral magnetic effect from anomalous-viscous fluid dynam- ics, Chin. Phys. C42, 011001 (2018), arXiv:1611.04586 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Azimuthal Charged-Particle Correlations and Possible Local Strong Parity Violation

    B. Abelevet al.(STAR Collaboration), Azimuthal Charged-Particle Correlations and Possible Local Strong Parity Violation, Phys.Rev.Lett.103, 251601 (2009), arXiv:0909.1739 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    B. Abelevet al.(STAR Collaboration), Observation of charge-dependent azimuthal correlations and possi- ble local strong parity violation in heavy ion collisions, Phys.Rev.C81, 054908 (2010), arXiv:0909.1717 [nucl- ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Charge separation relative to the reaction plane in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}= 2.76$ TeV

    B. Abelevet al.(ALICE), Charge separation rel- ative to the reaction plane in Pb-Pb collisions at√sN N= 2.76 TeV, Phys.Rev.Lett.110, 012301 (2013), arXiv:1207.0900 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Effects of Cluster Particle Correlations on Local Parity Violation Observables

    F. Wang, Effects of Cluster Particle Correlations on Lo- cal Parity Violation Observables, Phys.Rev.C81, 064902 (2010), arXiv:0911.1482 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    J. Liao, V. Koch, and A. Bzdak, On the Charge Separa- tion Effect in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys.Rev. C82, 054902 (2010), arXiv:1005.5380 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Charge conservation in RHIC and contributiuons to local parity violation observables

    S. Schlichting and S. Pratt, Charge conservation at ener- gies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and contributions to local parity violation observables, Phys.Rev.C83, 014913 (2011), arXiv:1009.4283 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Measurement of Charge Multiplicity Asymmetry Correlations in High Energy Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at 200 GeV

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Measurement of charge mul- tiplicity asymmetry correlations in high-energy nucleus- nucleus collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev.C89, 044908 (2014), arXiv:1303.0901 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    Beam-energy dependence of charge separation along the magnetic field in Au+Au collisions at RHIC

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Beam-energy dependence of charge separation along the magnetic field in Au+Au collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 052302 (2014), arXiv:1404.1433 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Observation of charge-dependent azimuthal correlations in pPb collisions and its implication for the search for the chiral magnetic effect

    V. Khachatryanet al.(CMS), Observation of charge- dependent azimuthal correlations inp-Pb collisions and its implication for the search for the chiral mag- netic effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 122301 (2017), arXiv:1610.00263 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Constraining the magnitude of the Chiral Magnetic Effect with Event Shape Engineering in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76$ TeV

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Constraining the magnitude of the Chiral Magnetic Effect with Event Shape Engi- 7 neering in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett.B777, 151 (2018), arXiv:1709.04723 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Adamet al.(STAR), Charge-dependent pair corre- lations relative to a third particle inp+ Au andd+ Au collisions at RHIC, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Charge-dependent pair corre- lations relative to a third particle inp+ Au andd+ Au collisions at RHIC, Phys. Lett.B798, 134975 (2019), arXiv:1906.03373 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Choudhuryet al., Investigation of experimental ob- servables in search of the chiral magnetic effect in heavy- ion collisions in the STAR experiment, Chin

    S. Choudhuryet al., Investigation of experimental ob- servables in search of the chiral magnetic effect in heavy- ion collisions in the STAR experiment, Chin. Phys. C46, 014101 (2022), arXiv:2105.06044 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Abdallahet al.(STAR), Search for the chiral mag- netic effect with isobar collisions at √sN N=200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys

    M. Abdallahet al.(STAR), Search for the chiral mag- netic effect with isobar collisions at √sN N=200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C105, 014901 (2022), arXiv:2109.00131 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Upper limit on the chi- ral magnetic effect in isobar collisions at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032005 (2024), arXiv:2308.16846 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Estimate of background baseline and upper limit on the chiral magnetic effect in isobar collisions at sNN=200 GeV at the BNL Relativis- tic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C110, 014905 (2024), arXiv:2310.13096 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    H.-J. Xu, J. Zhao, X. Wang, H. Li, Z.-W. Lin, C. Shen, and F. Wang, Varying the chiral magnetic effect relative to flow in a single nucleus-nucleus collision, Chin. Phys. C42, 084103 (2018), arXiv:1710.07265 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    S. A. Voloshin, Estimate of the signal from the chi- ral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions from mea- surements relative to the participant and specta- tor flow planes, Phys. Rev. C98, 054911 (2018), arXiv:1805.05300 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    M. Abdallahet al.(STAR), Search for the Chiral Mag- netic Effect via Charge-Dependent Azimuthal Correla- tions Relative to Spectator and Participant Planes in Au+Au Collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 092301 (2022), arXiv:2106.09243 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Y. Feng, J. Zhao, H. Li, H.-j. Xu, and F. Wang, Two- and three-particle nonflow contributions to the chiral mag- netic effect measurement by spectator and participant planes in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 105, 024913 (2022), arXiv:2106.15595 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Y. Feng, J. Zhao, and F. Wang, Back-to-back relative- excess observable to identify the chiral magnetic ef- fect, Phys. Rev. C101, 014915 (2020), arXiv:1908.10210 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Tang, Probe Chiral Magnetic Effect with Signed Balance Function, Chin

    A. Tang, Probe Chiral Magnetic Effect with Signed Balance Function, Chin. Phys. C44, 054101 (2020), arXiv:1903.04622 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    M. S. Abdallahet al.(STAR), Pair invariant mass to isolate background in the search for the chiral magnetic effect in Au + Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C106, 034908 (2022), arXiv:2006.05035 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Event-by-event corre- lations between Λ (Λ¯) hyperon global polarization and handedness with charged hadron azimuthal separation in Au+Au collisions at sNN=27 GeV from STAR, Phys. Rev. C108, 014909 (2023), arXiv:2304.10037 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    H.-S. Li, Y. Feng, and F. Wang, Influence of the chiral magnetic effect on particle-pair elliptic anisotropy, Phys. Rev. C111, 024904 (2025), arXiv:2404.05032 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, S. A. Voloshin, and G. Wang, Chiral magnetic and vortical effects in high-energy nu- clear collisions—A status report, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 88, 1 (2016), arXiv:1511.04050 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    D. E. Kharzeev, Topology, magnetic field, and strongly interacting matter, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.65, 193 (2015), arXiv:1501.01336 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Electromagnetic fields and anomalous transports in heavy-ion collisions --- A pedagogical review

    X.-G. Huang, Electromagnetic fields and anomalous transports in heavy-ion collisions — A pedagogi- cal review, Rept. Prog. Phys.79, 076302 (2016), arXiv:1509.04073 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Search for the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

    J. Zhao, Search for the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Rel- ativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A33, 1830010 (2018), arXiv:1805.02814 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Experimental searches for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions

    J. Zhao and F. Wang, Experimental searches for the chi- ral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 200 (2019), arXiv:1906.11413 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Li and G

    W. Li and G. Wang, Chiral Magnetic Effects in Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 293 (2020), arXiv:2002.10397 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    D. E. Kharzeev and J. Liao, Chiral magnetic effect re- veals the topology of gauge fields in heavy-ion collisions, Nature Rev. Phys.3, 55 (2021), arXiv:2102.06623 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, and P. Tribedy, Chiral magnetic effect in heavy ion collisions: The present and future, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430007 (2024), arXiv:2405.05427 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Y. Feng, S. A. Voloshin, and F. Wang, Experimental search for the chiral magnetic effect in relativistic heavy- ion collisions: A perspective, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 031001 (2025), arXiv:2502.09742 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    W. Li, Q. Shou, and F. Wang, Experimental re- view on the chiral magnetic effect in relativistic heavy ion collisions 10.1140/epjs/s11734-026-02225-x (2025), arXiv:2511.07358 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-026-02225-x 2025

  42. [42]

    B. B. Brandt, G. Endr˝ odi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, and G. Mark´ o, On the absence of the chiral magnetic effect in equilibrium QCD, JHEP09, 092, arXiv:2405.09484 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    B. B. Brandt, G. Endr˝ odi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, G. Mark´ o, and A. D. M. Valois, Localized chiral magnetic effect in equilibrium QCD, Phys. Rev. D112, 034508 (2025), arXiv:2409.17616 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Endrodi, QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review, Prog

    G. Endrodi, QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.141, 104153 (2025), arXiv:2406.19780 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    S. Shi, Y. Jiang, E. Lilleskov, and J. Liao, Anoma- lous Chiral Transport in Heavy Ion Collisions from Anomalous-Viscous Fluid Dynamics, Annals Phys.394, 50 (2018), arXiv:1711.02496 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    S. A. Voloshin, Collective phenomena in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions: anisotropic flow and more, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.67, 541 (2012), arXiv:1111.7241 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    S. A. Voloshin (ALICE), Results on flow from the AL- ICE Collaboration,Proceedings, 23rd International Con- ference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions : Quark Matter 2012 (QM 2012): Washington, DC, USA, August 13-18, 2012, Nucl. Phys.A904-905, 90c (2013), arXiv:1211.5680 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  48. [48]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Probing the chiral magnetic wave inpP band PbPb collisions at √sN N =5.02TeV us- ing charge-dependent azimuthal anisotropies, Phys. Rev. C100, 064908 (2019), arXiv:1708.08901 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Constraining the Chiral Mag- netic Effect with charge-dependent azimuthal correla- 8 tions in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV, JHEP09, 160, arXiv:2005.14640 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2005

  50. [50]

    Choudhury, G

    S. Choudhury, G. Wang, W. He, Y. Hu, and H. Z. Huang, Background evaluations for the chiral magnetic effect with normalized correlators using a multiphase transport model, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 383 (2020), arXiv:1909.04083 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    S. Shi, H. Zhang, D. Hou, and J. Liao, Signatures of Chiral Magnetic Effect in the Collisions of Isobars, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 242301 (2020), arXiv:1910.14010 [nucl- th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Lin and C

    Z.-W. Lin and C. Ko, Partonic effects on the elliptic flow at RHIC, Phys.Rev.C65, 034904 (2002), arXiv:nucl- th/0108039 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2002

  53. [53]

    Z.-W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, and S. Pal, A Multi-phase transport model for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys.Rev.C72, 064901 (2005), arXiv:nucl- th/0411110 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2005

  54. [54]

    I. P. Lokhtin, A. V. Belyaev, L. V. Malinina, S. V. Petrushanko, E. P. Rogochaya, and A. M. Snigirev, Hadron spectra, flow and correlations in PbPb collisions at the LHC: interplay between soft and hard physics, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 2045 (2012), arXiv:1204.4820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2045

  55. [55]

    L. V. Bravina, B. H. Brusheim Johansson, G. K. Eyyubova, V. L. Korotkikh, I. P. Lokhtin, L. V. Malinina, S. V. Petrushanko, A. M. Snigirev, and E. E. Zabrodin, Higher harmonics of azimuthal anisotropy in relativistic heavy ion collisions in HYDJET++ model, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 2807 (2014), arXiv:1311.7054 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    S. A. Basset al., Microscopic models for ultrarelativis- tic heavy ion collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.41, 255 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  57. [57]

    Fully integrated transport approach to heavy ion reactions with an intermediate hydrodynamic stage

    H. Petersen, J. Steinheimer, G. Burau, M. Bleicher, and H. St¨ ocker, A Fully Integrated Transport Ap- proach to Heavy Ion Reactions with an Intermediate Hydrodynamic Stage, Phys. Rev. C78, 044901 (2008), arXiv:0806.1695 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [58]

    C. Shen, Z. Qiu, H. Song, J. Bernhard, S. Bass, and U. Heinz, The iEBE-VISHNU code package for relativis- tic heavy-ion collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun.199, 61 (2016), arXiv:1409.8164 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    U. W. Heinz and J. Liu, Pre-equilibrium dynamics and heavy-ion observables, Nucl. Phys. A956, 549 (2016), arXiv:1512.08276 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Azimuthally fluctuating magnetic field and its impacts on observables in heavy-ion collisions

    J. Bloczynski, X.-G. Huang, X. Zhang, and J. Liao, Azimuthally fluctuating magnetic field and its impacts on observables in heavy-ion collisions, Phys.Lett.B718, 1529 (2013), arXiv:1209.6594 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    High-Energy-Physics Event Generation with PYTHIA 6.1

    T. Sjostrand, P. Eden, C. Friberg, L. Lonnblad, G. Miu,et al., High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 6.1, Comput.Phys.Commun.135, 238 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0010017 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  62. [62]

    B. Abelevet al.(STAR Collaboration), Systematic mea- surements of identified particle spectra inpp,d+Au and Au+Au collisions from STAR, Phys.Rev.C79, 034909 (2009), arXiv:0808.2041 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    C. W. Fabjanet al.(ALICE), ALICE: Physics Perfor- mance Report, J. Phys. G32, 1295 (2006)

    2006

  64. [64]

    Effects of final state interactions on charge separation in relativistic heavy ion collisions

    G.-L. Ma and B. Zhang, Effects of final state interactions on charge separation in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys.Lett.B700, 39 (2011), arXiv:1101.1701 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [65]

    Chen, X.-L

    B.-X. Chen, X.-L. Zhao, and G.-L. Ma, Difference be- tween signal and background of the chiral magnetic ef- fect relative to spectator and participant planes in isobar collisions at sNN=200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C109, 024909 (2024), arXiv:2301.12076 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Wang and M

    X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in p p, p A and A A collisions, Phys.Rev.D44, 3501 (1991)

    1991

  67. [67]

    Gyulassy and X.-N

    M. Gyulassy and X.-N. Wang, HIJING 1.0: A Monte Carlo program for parton and particle produc- tion in high-energy hadronic and nuclear collisions, Comput.Phys.Commun.83, 307 (1994), arXiv:nucl- th/9502021 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 1994