Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM Interpretations, and Tensions

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DESI-era data show an apparent preference for dark energy crossing the phantom divide, but the same expansion history can come from interactions, modified gravity, or non-standard dark matter, making the signal an indication, not a discover

desk verdict A competent, genuinely useful DESI-era review whose own section 2.3 undermines the opening claim; caveats about DDE are much sharper than caveats about the authors' own IDE alternatives. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.21826 v2 pith:DBDZPNJA submitted 2026-06-20 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAgr-qchep-phhep-th

Tian-Nuo Li , Guo-Hong Du , Hao Wang , Yun-He Li , Jing-Fei Zhang , Xin Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords darkenergydynamicalDESIbaryonacousticoscillationsphantomdivideequationofstateinteractingcosmologicaltensions
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark MatterDark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews the status of the dark-energy signal suggested by DESI baryon acoustic oscillation data. When combined with CMB and supernova measurements, the data favor a present-day dark energy equation of state w0 > −1 with negative evolution wa < 0, meaning dark energy was more phantom-like in the past and crosses the phantom divide today, at statistical significance between about 2.5σ and 4.2σ depending on the dataset. The review's central organizing claim is that this preference is degenerate: the same distance–redshift relation can be produced by a genuinely evolving dark energy fluid, by energy exchange between dark matter and dark energy, by a scalar field non-minimally coupled to gravity, or by dark matter with a non-zero effective pressure. It concludes that the real question is not whether dark energy evolves, but which assumption of the standard cosmological model is being tested, and how to separate any new physics from supernova calibration and BAO bin effects.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-parameter CPL form of the dark energy equation of state, w(a) = w0 + wa(1−a), which converts distance measurements into a statement about dark energy's present value and time variation. The review's organizing mechanism is the background-level degeneracy of the expansion history: BAO and supernovae constrain the distance–redshift relation, not the microscopic equation of state, so the same H(z) can be reproduced by an evolving dark energy fluid, a dark-sector interaction (e.g., Q proportional to ρ_de or ρ_c), a scalar-tensor modification of gravity with a non-minimal coupling such as ξφ²R, or a dark matter component with non-zero effective pressure. Breaking thi

What would settle it

Re-analyze DESI DR2 BAO + Planck CMB + SN data after replacing the DESY5 low-redshift anchor with a recalibrated, homogeneous sample (as in the DES-Dovekie-style updating) and check whether the (w0, wa) contour still excludes (−1, 0) at more than 2σ; separately, remove the z_eff ≈ 0.51 LRG distance point and see whether the contour shifts to consistency with ΛCDM within 2σ, as one cited analysis reports.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that current DESI BAO data, combined with Planck CMB and type Ia supernova compilations, deviate from the cosmological constant in a consistent direction: within the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder type parametrization w(a) = w0 + wa(1−a), the preferred region lies at w0 > −1 and wa < 0, corresponding to an equation of state that was more phantom-like at intermediate redshifts and approaches quintessence today. The statistical significance of this deviation ranges from about 2.5σ to 4.2σ depending on the supernova sample, with the DESY5 compilation giving the strongest preference and PantheonPlus the weakest. The review argues, however, that this background-level departure do

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the DESI BAO likelihoods, Planck CMB likelihoods, and supernova compilations — especially the heterogeneous low-redshift anchor of DESY5 — encode the true distance–redshift relation closely enough that the inferred w0 > −1, wa < 0 trend reflects cosmology rather than a few-hundredths-of-a-magnitude calibration offset in the supernova sample (or an anomalous BAO bin near z ≈ 0.51).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the DESI preference for w0 > −1, wa < 0 persists after supernova recalibration, the cosmological constant alone cannot describe the late-time expansion, and the first credible dynamical-dark-energy signature would be established.
  • A phantom-divide crossing, if real, rules out single canonical scalar-field dark energy and requires either additional degrees of freedom, interactions, or modified gravity.
  • The same dataset combination tightens the cosmological neutrino-mass bound to about 0.064 eV in ΛCDM, creating a tension with the normal-hierarchy lower limit; allowing dark energy to evolve relaxes this bound and can turn the neutrino-mass measurement into a positive detection.
  • The DESI-preferred dark energy does not relieve the H0 tension — it tends to lower the inferred H0 — so a full resolution needs early-universe modifications or interacting dark sectors rather than late-time dynamics alone.
  • Distinguishing the competing interpretations requires moving from background distances to growth-rate, lensing, and redshift-space-distortion measurements, which carry distinct perturbation-level signatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test of the systematics interpretation would be to recompute the DESI+CMB+DESY5 contour using a recalibrated low-redshift supernova anchor; if the preference for w0>−1, wa<0 falls below about 2σ, the signal is a calibration artifact rather than cosmology.
  • The review's degeneracy argument implies that a growth-rate measurement consistent with ΛCDM would simultaneously disfavor interacting dark energy and non-standard dark matter, leaving evolving dark energy or modified gravity as the remaining explanations — a testable prediction for upcoming redshift surveys.
  • The neutrino-mass channel offers a cheap discriminator: if future data fix a positive neutrino mass above roughly 0.1 eV within the evolving-equation-of-state model, that supports the phantom-to-quintessence crossing interpretation; if instead the negative-mass anomaly persists, the deviation is more likely a systematic in the matter-power spectrum.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review synthesizes the post-DESI literature on the apparent preference for dynamical dark energy (DDE) with w0 > −1, wa < 0, and the possible beyond-ΛCDM interpretations. After summarizing the DESI DR1/DR2 BAO, CMB, and SN constraints, the paper discusses parameterization dependence, the impact of BAO redshift bins and SN calibration, and reconstruction techniques. It then reviews three classes of alternatives to DDE: interacting dark energy (IDE), non-minimally coupled gravity (including hilltop thawing gravity), and non-standard dark matter. A final section considers the implications for the H0, S8, and neutrino-mass tensions. The paper is explicitly hedged in places, but the abstract and conclusion present the DESI-motivated departure from ΛCDM as a robust indication, which is not fully supported by the body's own caveats.

Significance. If the review's central framing is accepted, it provides a timely and fairly comprehensive map of the current DESI-driven model space and usefully emphasizes the degeneracy between DDE, IDE, modified gravity, and non-standard dark matter. Its main strengths are the explicit treatment of parameterization dependence (§2.2), the detailed discussion of SN and BAO systematics (§2.3), and the inclusion of recent recalibrations such as DES-Dovekie. The paper is also well-referenced, though with a heavy concentration of citations to the authors' own program. For a review, the value would be higher if the abstract and conclusion consistently carried the body's caution that the evidence is a dataset-dependent preference rather than an established deviation. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, but for a review this is not expected.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1, §2.1, §2.3 [Eq. (1)]] The significance of the DDE preference is reported inconsistently. §1 states the range 2.8–3.8σ, §2.1 states 2.5–3.9σ for DR1 combinations and 'up to 4.2σ' for DR2, while §2.3 notes that DES-Dovekie recalibration reduces the DR2 value from about 4.2σ to about 3.2σ. The abstract and conclusion quote only the high end or the uncalibrated value. Please harmonize the numbers and, at the very least, headline the recalibrated range in the abstract and conclusion so that readers are not left with an inflated significance.
  2. [§3.1, Fig. 4, §5] The claim that CF and CQ models show 'evidence for non-vanishing dark-sector interactions at the about 3−5σ level' (Li et al. 2026c) is presented as a settled result, but it relies entirely on a single preprint from the authors' own group using their own ePPF/IDECAMB pipeline. The body itself shows that the preference for interaction is model-dependent: §3.1 states that support depends sensitively on the assumed Q form, with only the Q = βH0ρde case giving 'approximately 3σ' (Li et al. 2024b). The conclusion's 'up to 5σ' is therefore misleading. Please report the spread of significances across models and datasets, and explicitly flag the provenance and the lack of independent confirmation.
  3. [§3.3, §5] Selective reporting in the conclusion: the statement that non-standard dark matter is preferred at 'approximately 2.4σ to 3σ' ignores the paper's own §3.3 finding that, once CPL dark energy is introduced, the significance drops to 0.8–1.1σ (Li et al. 2025e). Likewise, the conclusion's 'IDE up to 5σ' omits the weaker or model-dependent results reported earlier. A review should not cherry-pick the largest significance in the literature; it should give the range and the conditions under which the strongest values arise.
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (12)–(15), §5] The 'remarkable' Bayes factor of log(B) = 7.34 ± 0.6 for the hilltop thawing gravity model comes from a single analysis (Wolf et al. 2025b). No caveat is given about prior sensitivity, dataset choice, or the fact that this is not an independent cross-check. Given that the review's stated goal is to 'disentangle new physics scenarios from systematic errors,' the Bayesian evidence should be presented with the same caution applied to the DESI-DDE significance. Please add a sentence noting the model- and prior-dependence of such Bayes factors.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1, §2.1] The significance range is quoted as 2.8–3.8σ in §1 but 2.5–3.9σ in §2.1. Please make these numbers consistent and define which dataset combination each endpoint refers to.
  2. [§4.1, §4.3] Duplicate reference in the text: 'Yashiki 2025' appears twice in §4.1, and 'Chudaykin et al. 2025' is listed twice in §4.3. The bibliography also contains several entries with the same year but no distinguishing letter. Please clean up the reference list.
  3. [§5] The final paragraph advertises a future review by the same authors ('Zhang 2026, in preparation'). This is unusual in a journal article and reads as self-promotion. It should be removed or moved to the acknowledgments.
  4. [Throughout] The paper uses both 'parametrization' and 'parameterization' inconsistently. Pick one spelling for consistency. Also, equations (9) and (10) define w_eff^de and w_eff^c but the notation is not used later; consider either using it or removing it to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: a self-contained review whose central claim rests on external data and explicit degeneracy equations.

full rationale

This is a review paper, not a derivation, so the usual circularity tests apply less stringently. Its load-bearing claim—that DESI BAO + CMB + SN data currently show a dataset-dependent preference for w0 > -1, wa < 0 whose physical origin is ambiguous—is anchored to external DESI DR1/DR2 analyses (Adame et al. 2025; Abdul Karim et al. 2025), external SN compilations, and the paper's own parametric robustness studies, not to a circular definition. The claim that interacting dark energy, non-minimally coupled gravity, and non-standard dark matter can mimic the same background departure is demonstrated directly in the text: Eqs. (9)-(10) define effective equations of state from an interaction Q, making the degeneracy explicit and analytic rather than a fitted-then-relabeled prediction. The paper also repeatedly flags its own weak points (§2.3: hundredths-of-magnitude SN calibration offsets, DES-Dovekie reducing significance from ~4.2σ to ~3.2σ, and sensitivity to the DESI LRG2 bin), which further disarms any charge that inputs are being disguised as outputs. The frequent self-citations (ePPF/IDECAMB, running-coupling parametrization, unified CF/CQ fits of Li et al. 2026c) are genuine model fits to the same data; they support the review's 'alternative interpretations' thesis, but that thesis does not reduce to them, because the background degeneracy is independently shown in the manuscript. The only self-referential oddity is a promised future review (Zhang 2026, 'in preparation'), which is a forward reference to omitted work, not a circular argument. No step was found in which an output equals an input by construction. Score 2 reflects the presence of numerous self-citations, none of which is load-bearing for the central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The review makes no new fit, so the ledger lists the parameters and assumptions that its quoted evidence inherits. The headline DDE significances are joint fits of (w0, wa) per parametrization; the IDE and HTG evidence are fits of β, ξ, V0, λ, etc. to the same DESI+CMB+SN data; the neutrino-mass 'resolution' is a joint fit of Σmν and Neff. The review's organizing degeneracy claim is a domain assumption asserted in §3 rather than derived. No new entities are introduced by this paper; the entities listed are inherited from the cited literature.

free parameters (5)
  • w0, wa (six parametrizations: CPL, JBP, BA, EXP, LOG, SIN) = w0 ≳ −1, wa < 0; significance 2.5–4.2σ
    The headline DDE evidence is a joint fit of these two parameters per parametrization to the same DESI+CMB+SN data, quoted throughout §2.
  • β (IDE couplings: Q=βHρc, Q=βH0ρde, running β(a)) = non-zero at 3–5σ (authors' own fits)
    The review's claim that IDE can reach 'up to 5σ' (§5) comes from fitting β to the same combined data in the authors' CF/CQ and running-coupling analyses.
  • ξ, V0, λ (thawing gravity / HTG) = ln B = 7.34 ± 0.6 (quoted)
    The HTG Bayesian evidence quoted in §3.2 depends on these parameters being fitted to Planck+DESI DR2+DESY5 data.
  • wdm (dark matter EoS) = −0.084 ± 0.035 (DESI+DESY5, quoted)
    The non-standard dark matter evidence in §3.3 is the fit of a single constant wdm to various dataset combinations.
  • Σmν, Neff = Σmν = 0.098 +0.016/−0.037 eV (quoted)
    The neutrino-mass 'resolution' claims in §4.3 come from jointly fitting these parameters with DDE/IDE to CMB+DESI+DESY5+DESY1.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DESI DR1/DR2 BAO likelihoods, Planck 2018 CMB likelihoods, and the PantheonPlus/Union3/DESY5/DES-Dovekie SN compilations correctly encode the underlying measurements.
    Every significance quoted in §2 inherits the public likelihoods' calibration; the review itself flags SN low-z calibration and specific BAO bins (LRG z_eff≈0.51, §2.3) as fragile.
  • domain assumption A two-parameter w(a) ansatz (CPL, JBP, BA, EXP, LOG, SIN) adequately describes the possible DE departure.
    The DDE evidence is defined inside this family (§2.2); the review acknowledges parametrization dependence, so the quoted significances are conditional on these forms.
  • domain assumption BAO+SN constrain only the background distance–redshift relation, so DDE, IDE, non-minimally coupled gravity, and non-standard DM are degenerate at the level of the DESI signal.
    The review's central organizational claim (§3 intro)—that the same H(z) can be produced by modifying different sectors—relies on this degeneracy, which is asserted rather than derived.
  • domain assumption The ePPF/IDECAMB implementation provides a stable, correct perturbation treatment for IDE models.
    §3.1's 3–5σ interaction claims inherit the ePPF/IDECAMB implementation of Li & Zhang (2014, 2023); its suppression of large-scale instabilities is assumed valid rather than re-derived here.
  • domain assumption The terrestrial oscillation lower bound Σmν ≳ 0.06 eV (NH) is correct.
    §4.3's neutrino-mass tension (cosmological upper bound 0.064 eV vs NH lower bound) presupposes the reliability of oscillation and β-decay experiments.
invented entities (3)
  • Running dark-sector interaction β(a) = β0 a + βe(1−a)
    purpose: Allows the DE–DM energy transfer to change sign over cosmic history, mimicking DDE at the background level; underpins Fig. 5–6 claims of sign-change evidence.
    Introduced by Li & Zhang (2011); the review reports no falsifiable handle outside the fitted DESI+CMB+SN data. It is a reparametrization of the fitted interaction, not an entity with independent prediction.
  • Non-minimal coupling operator Ω (thawing gravity / HTG, ξφ²R)
    purpose: Lets w(z) cross −1 without phantom instability; drives the quoted ln B = 7.34.
    Proposed in cited works by Ye/Wolf groups; the review reports the same data fits as evidence. No out-of-sample test (e.g., screening in local gravity) is given in the review.
  • ePPF perturbation prescription for IDE independent evidence
    purpose: Removes non-physical large-scale instabilities in IDE perturbations, enabling CMB likelihood comparisons.
    Implemented in the public IDECAMB code (Li & Zhang 2023), giving external groups a checkable handle—partial independent evidence, though the underlying work is the authors' own.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM Interpretations, and Tensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DBDZPNJA

@misc{pith2026260621826,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-$\Lambda$CDM Interpretations, and Tensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DBDZPNJA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.21826}
}
abstract

Recent baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from DESI provide important new clues for reassessing whether the standard $\Lambda$CDM model offers a sufficient description of the late-time expansion history of the Universe. When combined with cosmic microwave background and type Ia supernova data, these measurements show an apparent departure from the $\Lambda$CDM model, commonly described as dynamical dark energy (DDE) with equation of state crossing the phantom divide (i.e., quintom behavior). This review examines the current status of the DESI-motivated indications for DDE and their possible implications for physics beyond $\Lambda$CDM. We discuss how the strength of the preference for DDE depends on the adopted parametrization and dataset combination, and how residual systematics or internal tensions among datasets may affect its interpretation. At the background level, several mechanisms beyond $\Lambda$CDM can produce similar expansion histories. We therefore further discuss how the same effective departure from $w=-1$ may arise from physically distinct scenarios, including interacting dark energy, non-minimally coupled gravity, and non-standard dark matter. Meanwhile, these different new-physics interpretations may have different implications for current cosmological tensions, especially those involving $H_0$, $S_8$, and $\sum m_\nu$. In conclusion, the question posed by DESI is not merely whether dark energy evolves with time, but rather how, within the framework of precision cosmology, to disentangle new physics scenarios from systematic errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21826 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two-dimensional marginalized contours for the CPL parameters (𝑤0, 𝑤𝑎) from different combinations of DESI BAO, CMB, and SN datasets (Abdul Karim et al. 2025). 2026; Li et al. 2026d; Shlivko & Poulin 2026; Gökçen et al. 2026; Wu et al. 2026a). Nevertheless, despite the excitement generated by these re￾sults, it is important to emphasize that the current evidence for DDE remains far from conclusive. First, the current… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two-dimensional marginalized contours in the (𝑤0, 𝑤𝑎) plane for six DDE parametrizations (CPL, JBP, BA, EXP, LOG, and SIN). The constraints are obtained using combinations of CMB, DESI DR2 BAO, and SN data. The red star denotes the ΛCDM model at (𝑤0, 𝑤𝑎) = (−1, 0). The boundary lines, specifically the solid line (𝑤0 = −1) and the dashed line (𝑤0 + 𝑤𝑎 = −1, characterizing the EoS of DE in the early universe 𝑎 → 0 to … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. At the same time, the 𝑧eff ≃ 0.71 LRG bin tends to pull the inferred Ωm to lower values and has been discussed as an important contributor to the departure from the Planck￾ΛCDM expectation (Naredo-Tuero et al. 2024; Colgáin et al. 2026). Thus, although the full DESI BAO dataset is internally consistent at the current precision, a small number of intermediate-redshift BAO measurements can have a dispro￾portionately l… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional marginalized contours (1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence levels) in the 𝛽 − 𝛼 plane within the CQ model (upper panel) and in the 𝛽 − 𝑤 plane within the CF model (lower panel) from DESI, CMB, and SN data (Li et al. 2026c). logical in most applications, this framework…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Reconstructed evolutionary history of 𝛽(𝑧) at 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence levels in the IDE1, IDE2, IDE3, and IDE4 models. The black dashed line in each plot represents the non-interacting line 𝛽(𝑧) = 0 (Li et al. 2026a). range interaction, can yield an observable effective E…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Reconstructed evolution of 𝛽(𝑧) with 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence intervals for CMB+DESI and its combinations with individual SN datasets. Blue solid lines and shaded regions show DESI DR1-based reconstructions, red dashed lines show DESI DR2-based results, and black dashed li…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Reconstruction of the EoS of DE for the non-minimally coupled scalar field model. The shaded regions denote the confi￾dence intervals, illustrating that the EoS remains in the phantom regime at higher redshifts before sharply thawing and crossing the boundary at 𝑧 ≈ 0.…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: , utilizing DESI DR2 BAO, DESY5 SN, Planck data, 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 wdm 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P/P max DESI DESI+DESY5 P18 DESI+DESY3+DESY5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Marginalized joint 1𝜎 and 2𝜎 confidence level contours for 𝐻0 and the PMFs parameter 𝑏pmf for various data combinations (Jedamzik et al. 2026). Modified gravity theories provide a theoretical framework for reconciling observational discrepancies by geometrically alteri…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The fractional difference in CDM density perturbations, Δ𝛿𝑐/𝛿𝑐, as a function of the scale factor 𝑎 for the dark axion and dark baryons interaction model (Khoury et al. 2025). Here, “model 1” and “model 2” correspond to two fiducial models with distinct parameter choi…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The one-dimensional marginalized posterior dis￾tributions of Í 𝑚𝜈 in the ΛCDM + Í 𝑚𝜈 + 𝑁eff, 𝑤CDM + Í 𝑚𝜈 + 𝑁eff, and 𝑤0𝑤𝑎CDM + Í 𝑚𝜈 + 𝑁eff models using the CMB+DESI+DESY5+DESY1 data (Du et al. 2025b). Therefore, as previously noted, the DDE preferred by current DESI d…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The one-dimensional marginalized posterior distribu￾tions of Í 𝑚𝜈 in the CCBH Madau 𝜓 and CCBH Trinca 𝜓 models using the CMB+DESI DR2 BAO data (Ahlen et al. 2025). An alternative pathway to alleviate the tension involves con￾structing a physical late-time conversion m…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration at the perturbation level: a CLASS implementation and first Boltzmann-code constraints

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First full Boltzmann-code implementation of entropic dark energy, with MCMC constraints from CMB+BAO+SN, yields α≈1 and a fit statistically indistinguishable from ΛCDM.

  2. Hubble tension: the shape wall

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Late-time modifications to the expansion history can raise H0 by at most about 2% (conservative) to 3.7% (permissive) if the CMB acoustic scale is fixed.

  3. Cosmological Evidence for Dark Axion-Dark Baryon Interactions from Apparent Phantom Crossing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dark axion–dark baryon interactions improve the fit to CMB+DESI+SNe by Δχ²=-14.5 over ΛCDM, via a non-monotonic dark-matter mass that mimics phantom crossing, while leaving the Hubble tension unresolved.

  4. Evaporating cosmologically coupled black holes

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    If a black hole's mass grows with cosmic expansion, Hawking evaporation is slowed or reversed, weakening gamma-ray bounds on primordial black holes.

  5. HIcosmo: a differentiable JAX-based framework for cosmology inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HIcosmo is a new JAX-based differentiable framework for background cosmology inference that matches Cobaya results while delivering 8.7x CPU and up to 20x GPU speedups.

  6. Running into tension: primordial black holes from ultra-slow-roll inflation, spectral running, and the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    EDE models increase inferred α_s from CMB data, strengthening tension with USR PBH models that predict negative running.

  7. Neutrino mass constraints in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter black-hole dark energy model with ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    SdSDE dark energy yields a ~0.16–0.21 eV positive neutrino-mass preference with DESI+ACT data, but χ² strongly favors extended ΛCDM and the shift is likely compensation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

297 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    Abbott, T. M. C., et al. 2026 a . 2601.14559

    arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    ---. 2026 b . 2602.10065

    arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Abdalla, E., Piedra, O. P. F., Escobal, A. A., et al. 2026. 2605.20060

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    2022, JHEAp, 34, 49, 10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002

    Abdalla, E., et al. 2022, JHEAp, 34, 49, 10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002

    doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022

  8. [8]

    2025, Phys

    Abdul Karim, M., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 083515, 10.1103/tr6y-kpc6

    doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 2025

Show all 297 references
  1. [9]

    A., Pan, S., Di Valentino, E., & Yang, W

    Abedin, M., Escamilla, L. A., Pan, S., Di Valentino, E., & Yang, W. 2025 a , Phys. Rev. D, 112, 123537, 10.1103/r8sv-1g4q

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    2025 b , Mon

    Abedin, M., Wang, G.-J., Ma, Y.-Z., & Pan, S. 2025 b , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 540, 2253, 10.1093/mnras/staf762

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    G., et al

    Adame, A. G., et al. 2025, JCAP, 02, 021, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    2026, JCAP, 03, 015, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/015

    Adi, T. 2026, JCAP, 03, 015, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/015

    2026 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Zapata, M

    Adil, S. A., Zapata, M. A., Akarsu, \"O ., & Vazquez, J. A. 2026. 2603.14693

    2026 arXiv

  6. [14]

    2020, Astron

    Aghanim, N., et al. 2020, Astron. Astrophys., 641, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    P., et al

    Ahlen, S. P., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. Lett., 135, 081003, 10.1103/yb2k-kn7h

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    2025, Science, 388, adq9592, 10.1126/science.adq9592

    Aker, M., et al. 2025, Science, 388, adq9592, 10.1126/science.adq9592

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    Alam, S., & Hossain, M. W. 2026, JCAP, 04, 042, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/04/042

    2026 doi

  10. [18]

    2017, Mon

    Alam, S., et al. 2017, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 470, 2617, 10.1093/mnras/stx721

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    2021, Phys

    ---. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 083533, 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083533

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Aloni, D., & Sch \"o neberg, N

    Allali, I. J., Aloni, D., & Sch \"o neberg, N. 2024, JCAP, 09, 019, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/019

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Li, L., Singh, P., & Fan, J

    Allali, I. J., Li, L., Singh, P., & Fan, J. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 083515, 10.1103/14tf-4nk2

    2026 doi

  14. [22]

    J., & Notari, A

    Allali, I. J., & Notari, A. 2024, JCAP, 12, 020, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/020

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    1999, Phys

    Amendola, L. 1999, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 043501, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.043501

    1999 doi

  16. [24]

    2000, Phys

    ---. 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 043511, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043511

    2000 doi

  17. [25]

    A., & Lust, D

    Anchordoqui, L. A., & Lust, D. 2026. 2605.10476

    2026 arXiv

  18. [26]

    F., & Wang, X

    Antusch, S., King, S. F., & Wang, X. 2026. 2604.08449

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    F., & Steinhardt, P

    Armendariz-Picon, C., Mukhanov, V. F., & Steinhardt, P. J. 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 4438, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438

    2000 doi

  20. [28]

    2021, Astron

    Asgari, M., et al. 2021, Astron. Astrophys., 645, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039070

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    P., & da Silva, H

    Avelino, P. P., & da Silva, H. M. R. 2012, Phys. Lett. B, 714, 6, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.063

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    2014, Phys

    Aviles, A., Bravetti, A., Capozziello, S., & Luongo, O. 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 043531, 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043531

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    B, A., & Suresh, P. K. 2025, Class. Quant. Grav., 42, 165008, 10.1088/1361-6382/adf40a

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    Banik, I., Desmond, H., Kalaitzidis, V., & Mazurenko, S. 2026. 2602.03928

    2026

  25. [33]

    2026, Phys

    Bansal, P., & Huterer, D. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 103539, 10.1103/ydnj-myzb

    2026 doi

  26. [34]

    M., & Alcaniz, J

    Barboza, Jr., E. M., & Alcaniz, J. S. 2008, Phys. Lett. B, 666, 415, 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.012

    2008 doi

  27. [35]

    2025, Phys

    Barenboim, G., Froustey, J., Pitrou, C., & Sanchis, H. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 123549, 10.1103/kg29-yq85

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    2025, Phys

    Barroso Varela, M., & Bertolami, O. 2025, Phys. Dark Univ., 48, 101861, 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101861

    2025

  29. [37]

    C., Kahlhoefer, F., Lesgourgues, J., & Sch \"o neberg, N

    Becker, N., Hooper, D. C., Kahlhoefer, F., Lesgourgues, J., & Sch \"o neberg, N. 2021, JCAP, 02, 019, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/02/019

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Bella, M., Poulin, V., Vagnozzi, S., & Knox, L. 2026. 2604.13535

    2026 arXiv

  31. [39]

    L., et al

    Bennett, C. L., et al. 2003, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 148, 1, 10.1086/377253

    2003 doi

  32. [40]

    2025, JCAP, 04, 054, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/054

    Benso, C., Schwetz, T., & Vatsyayan, D. 2025, JCAP, 04, 054, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/054

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    P., & Coley, A

    Billyard, A. P., & Coley, A. A. 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 083503, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.083503

    2000 doi

  34. [42]

    G., Caldera-Cabral, G., Lazkoz, R., & Maartens, R

    Boehmer, C. G., Caldera-Cabral, G., Lazkoz, R., & Maartens, R. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 023505, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.023505

    2008 doi

  35. [43]

    G., Petronikolou, M., & Saridakis, E

    Bouhmadi-L \'o pez, M., Boiza, C. G., Petronikolou, M., & Saridakis, E. N. 2026, Universe, 12, 81, 10.3390/universe12030081

    2026 doi

  36. [44]

    2025, JCAP, 11, 064, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/064

    Braglia, M., Chen, X., & Loeb, A. 2025, JCAP, 11, 064, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/064

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    A., Chacko, Z., Flood, I., et al

    Buen-Abad, M. A., Chacko, Z., Flood, I., et al. 2025. 2511.16554

    2025

  38. [46]

    S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M

    Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 55, 343, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    2010, Phys

    Cai, R.-G., & Su, Q. 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 81, 103514, 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.103514

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    Cai, R.-G., & Wang, S.-J. 2026. 2606.20434

    2026 arXiv

  41. [49]

    2025, 10.1093/nsr/nwag115

    Cai, Y., Ren, X., Qiu, T., Li, M., & Zhang, X. 2025, 10.1093/nsr/nwag115

    2025 doi

  42. [50]

    Cai, Y.-F., Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M., & Saridakis, E. N. 2016, Rept. Prog. Phys., 79, 106901, 10.1088/0034-4885/79/10/106901

    2016 doi

  43. [51]

    N., Setare, M

    Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N., Setare, M. R., & Xia, J.-Q. 2010, Phys. Rept., 493, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    Caldera-Cabral, G., Maartens, R., & Urena-Lopez, L. A. 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 79, 063518, 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063518

    2009 doi

  45. [53]

    Caldwell, R. R. 2002, Phys. Lett. B, 545, 23, 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02589-3

    2002 doi

  46. [54]

    R., Dave, R., & Steinhardt, P

    Caldwell, R. R., Dave, R., & Steinhardt, P. J. 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 1582, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582

    1998 doi

  47. [55]

    2023, Phys

    Capozziello, S., & D'Agostino, R. 2023, Phys. Dark Univ., 42, 101346, 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101346

    2023

  48. [56]

    2026, Astron

    Carloni, Y., Luongo, O., & Muccino, M. 2026, Astron. Astrophys., 707, A383, 10.1051/0004-6361/202556049

    2026 doi

  49. [57]

    M., Duvvuri, V., Trodden, M., & Turner, M

    Carroll, S. M., Duvvuri, V., Trodden, M., & Turner, M. S. 2004, Phys. Rev. D, 70, 043528, 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043528

    2004 doi

  50. [58]

    2024, JCAP, 05, 003, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/003

    Castello, S., Mancarella, M., Grimm, N., et al. 2024, JCAP, 05, 003, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/003

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    K., Das, S., & Dutta, K

    Chakraborty, A., Chanda, P. K., Das, S., & Dutta, K. 2025, JCAP, 11, 047, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/047

    2025 doi

  52. [60]

    2026, JHEP, 05, 053, 10.1007/JHEP05(2026)053

    Chattopadhyay, S., & Dighe, A. 2026, JHEP, 05, 053, 10.1007/JHEP05(2026)053

    2026 doi

  53. [61]

    K., G \'o mez-Vargas, I., & Mustafa, G

    Chaudhary, H., Capozziello, S., Sharma, V. K., G \'o mez-Vargas, I., & Mustafa, G. 2026, Eur. Phys. J. C, 86, 564, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15806-w

    2026 doi

  54. [62]

    2025, Phys

    Chaussidon, E., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 063548, 10.1103/xtql-wh3h

    2025 doi

  55. [63]

    2026, JCAP, 01, 041, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/01/041

    Chebat, D., et al. 2026, JCAP, 01, 041, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/01/041

    2026 doi

  56. [64]

    M., Muralidharan, V., & Salewicz, B

    Chen, R., Cline, J. M., Muralidharan, V., & Salewicz, B. 2026, JCAP, 03, 044, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/044

    2026 doi

  57. [65]

    2025, JCAP, 07, 059, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/059

    Chen, X., & Loeb, A. 2025, JCAP, 07, 059, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/059

    2025 doi

  58. [66]

    A., Sen, A

    Cheng, H., Di Valentino, E., Escamilla, L. A., Sen, A. A., & Visinelli, L. 2025 a , JCAP, 09, 031, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/031

    2025 doi

  59. [67]

    2026, Astrophys

    Cheng, H., Pan, S., & Di Valentino, E. 2026, Astrophys. J., 999, 190, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3a8f

    2026 doi

  60. [68]

    Cheng, H., Yin, Z., Di Valentino, E., Marsh, D. J. E., & Visinelli, L. 2025 b . 2506.19096

    2025

  61. [69]

    2001, Int

    Chevallier, M., & Polarski, D. 2001, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 10, 213, 10.1142/S0218271801000822

    2001 doi

  62. [70]

    P., Richarte, M

    Chimento, L. P., Richarte, M. G., & S \'a nchez Garc \' a, I. E. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 88, 087301, 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.087301

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    2025, Mon

    Chluba, J., Vasil, G., & Battye, R. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 543, 456, 10.1093/mnras/staf1465

    2025 doi

  64. [72]

    M., & Philcox, O

    Chudaykin, A., Ivanov, M. M., & Philcox, O. H. E. 2025. 2511.20757

    2025 arXiv

  65. [73]

    2024, Phys

    Chudaykin, A., & Kunz, M. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 123524, 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123524

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    2012, Phys

    Clemson, T., Koyama, K., Zhao, G.-B., Maartens, R., & Valiviita, J. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 043007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.043007

    2012 doi

  67. [75]

    G., Padilla, A., & Skordis, C

    Clifton, T., Ferreira, P. G., Padilla, A., & Skordis, C. 2012, Phys. Rept., 513, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001

    2012 doi

  68. [76]

    \'O ., Dainotti, M

    Colg \'a in, E. \'O ., Dainotti, M. G., Capozziello, S., et al. 2026, JHEAp, 49, 100428, 10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100428

    2026

  69. [77]

    \'O ., & Sheikh-Jabbari, M

    Colg \'a in, E. \'O ., & Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 542, L24, 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf042

    2025 doi

  70. [78]

    J., Sami, M., & Tsujikawa, S

    Copeland, E. J., Sami, M., & Tsujikawa, S. 2006, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 15, 1753, 10.1142/S021827180600942X

    2006 doi

  71. [79]

    E., & Manohar, A

    Dalal, N., Abazajian, K., Jenkins, E. E., & Manohar, A. V. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 141302, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.141302

    2001 doi

  72. [80]

    Das, A., Dev, P. S. B., Gao, C., Ghosh, S., & Kim, T. 2026, Phys. Rev. Lett., 136, 131003, 10.1103/jprg-jll6

    2026 doi

  73. [81]

    S., & Khoury, J

    Das, S., Corasaniti, P. S., & Khoury, J. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, 73, 083509, 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083509

    2006 doi

  74. [82]

    F., Forero, D

    de Salas, P. F., Forero, D. V., Gariazzo, S., et al. 2021, JHEP, 02, 071, 10.1007/JHEP02(2021)071

    2021 doi

  75. [83]

    Denton, P. B. 2025. 2501.08374

    2025

  76. [84]

    2021, Mon

    Di Valentino, E. 2021, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 502, 2065, 10.1093/mnras/stab187

    2021 doi

  77. [85]

    2022, Universe, 8, 399, 10.3390/universe8080399

    ---. 2022, Universe, 8, 399, 10.3390/universe8080399

    2022 doi

  78. [86]

    2026, PoS, COSMICWISPers2025, 012, 10.22323/1.507.0012

    ---. 2026, PoS, COSMICWISPers2025, 012, 10.22323/1.507.0012

    2026 doi

  79. [87]

    Di Valentino, E., Gariazzo, S., & Mena, O. 2024. 2404.19322

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    2017, Phys

    Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., & Mena, O. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 043503, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043503

    2017 doi

  81. [89]

    2020, Phys

    Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., Mena, O., & Vagnozzi, S. 2020, Phys. Dark Univ., 30, 100666, 10.1016/j.dark.2020.100666

    2020

  82. [91]

    2021 b , Class

    Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., et al. 2021 b , Class. Quant. Grav., 38, 153001, 10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d

    2021 doi

  83. [92]

    2021 c , Astropart

    Di Valentino, E., et al. 2021 c , Astropart. Phys., 131, 102604, 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102604

    2021

  84. [93]

    2025, Phys

    ---. 2025, Phys. Dark Univ., 49, 101965, 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965

    2025

  85. [94]

    2016, Phys

    Dimakis, N., Karagiorgos, A., Zampeli, A., et al. 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 123518, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123518

    2016 doi

  86. [95]

    Dinda, B. R. 2024, JCAP, 09, 062, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/062

    2024 doi

  87. [96]

    Du, G.-H., Li, T.-N., Ling, J.-L., et al. 2025 a . 2510.26355

    2025 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Du, G.-H., Li, T.-N., Liu, T., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2026 a . 2602.03110

    2026 arXiv

  89. [98]

    2026 b , Eur

    Du, G.-H., Li, T.-N., Wu, P.-J., et al. 2026 b , Eur. Phys. J. C, 86, 110, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15237-z

    2026 doi

  90. [99]

    Du, G.-H., Li, T.-N., Wu, P.-J., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2025 b . 2507.16589

    2025 arXiv

  91. [100]

    2025 c , Eur

    Du, G.-H., Wu, P.-J., Li, T.-N., & Zhang, X. 2025 c , Eur. Phys. J. C, 85, 392, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14094-0

    2025 doi

  92. [101]

    2025, Mon

    Efstathiou, G. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 538, 875, 10.1093/mnras/staf301

    2025 doi

  93. [102]

    A., & Perivolaropoulos, L

    Efstratiou, D., Paraskevas, E. A., & Perivolaropoulos, L. 2025. 2511.04610

    2025

  94. [103]

    J., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., et al. 2005, Astrophys. J., 633, 560, 10.1086/466512

    2005 doi

  95. [104]

    2025, Phys

    Elbers, W., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 083513, 10.1103/w9pk-xsk7

    2025 doi

  96. [105]

    A., Akarsu, O., Di Valentino, E., & Vazquez, J

    Escamilla, L. A., Akarsu, O., Di Valentino, E., & Vazquez, J. A. 2023, JCAP, 11, 051, 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/051

    2023 doi

  97. [106]

    G., & Abazajian, K

    Escudero, H. G., & Abazajian, K. N. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 043520, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043520

    2025 doi

  98. [107]

    C., Maltoni, M., et al

    Esteban, I., Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C., Maltoni, M., et al. 2024, JHEP, 12, 216, 10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216

    2024 doi

  99. [108]

    C., Maltoni, M., Schwetz, T., & Zhou, A

    Esteban, I., Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C., Maltoni, M., Schwetz, T., & Zhou, A. 2020, JHEP, 09, 178, 10.1007/JHEP09(2020)178

    2020 doi

  100. [109]

    2008, Phys

    Fang, W., Hu, W., & Lewis, A. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 78, 087303, 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.087303

    2008 doi

  101. [110]

    R., & Peebles, P

    Farrar, G. R., & Peebles, P. J. E. 2004, Astrophys. J., 604, 1, 10.1086/381728

    2004 doi

  102. [111]

    2026, Astrophys

    Fazzari, E., Giar \`e , W., & Di Valentino, E. 2026, Astrophys. J. Lett., 996, L5, 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2917

    2026 doi

  103. [112]

    2005, Phys

    Feng, B., Wang, X.-L., & Zhang, X.-M. 2005, Phys. Lett. B, 607, 35, 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071

    2005 doi

  104. [113]

    2020 a , Sci

    Feng, L., He, D.-Z., Li, H.-L., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2020 a , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 63, 290404, 10.1007/s11433-019-1511-8

    2020 doi

  105. [114]

    2020 b , Sci

    Feng, L., Li, H.-L., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2020 b , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 63, 220401, 10.1007/s11433-019-9431-9

    2020 doi

  106. [115]

    2025, Phys

    Feng, L., Li, T.-N., Du, G.-H., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2025, Phys. Dark Univ., 48, 101935, 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101935

    2025

  107. [116]

    2026, Phys

    ---. 2026, Phys. Dark Univ., 52, 102296, 10.1016/j.dark.2026.102296

    2026

  108. [117]

    2024, JCAP, 05, 097, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/097

    Forconi, M., Giar \`e , W., Mena, O., et al. 2024, JCAP, 05, 097, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/097

    2024 doi

  109. [118]

    2024, Chin

    Gao, L.-Y., Xue, S.-S., & Zhang, X. 2024, Chin. Phys. C, 48, 051001, 10.1088/1674-1137/ad2b52

    2024 doi

  110. [119]

    2021, JCAP, 07, 005, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/005

    Gao, L.-Y., Zhao, Z.-W., Xue, S.-S., & Zhang, X. 2021, JCAP, 07, 005, 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/005

    2021 doi

  111. [120]

    2025, Phys

    Gao, Q., Gong, Y., Yi, Z., & Zhang, F. 2025, Phys. Dark Univ., 50, 102106, 10.1016/j.dark.2025.102106

    2025

  112. [121]

    Garny, M., Niedermann, F., & Sloth, M. S. 2026. 2602.23895

    2026

  113. [122]

    2024, Phys

    Ghosh, B., & Bengaly, C. 2024, Phys. Dark Univ., 46, 101699, 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101699

    2024

  114. [123]

    D., H \"u tsi, G., Raidal, M., et al

    Gialamas, I. D., H \"u tsi, G., Raidal, M., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 063551, 10.1103/kdqc-y37v

    2025 doi

  115. [124]

    2025, Phys

    Giani, L., Von Marttens, R., & Camilleri, R. 2025, Phys. Rev. Lett., 135, 071004, 10.1103/zr92-m7py

    2025 doi

  116. [126]

    2025, Phys

    ---. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 023508, 10.1103/ss37-cxhn

    2025 doi

  117. [128]

    2025 b , Phys

    Giar \`e , W., Mena, O., Specogna, E., & Di Valentino, E. 2025 b , Phys. Rev. D, 112, 103520, 10.1103/njfc-pd1w

    2025 doi

  118. [129]

    Giar \`e , W., Najafi, M., Pan, S., Di Valentino, E., & Firouzjaee, J. T. 2024 a , JCAP, 10, 035, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035

    2024 doi

  119. [130]

    A., Nunes, R

    Giar \`e , W., Sabogal, M. A., Nunes, R. C., & Di Valentino, E. 2024 b , Phys. Rev. Lett., 133, 251003, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.251003

    2024 doi

  120. [131]

    2024 c , Phys

    Giar \`e , W., Zhai, Y., Pan, S., et al. 2024 c , Phys. Rev. D, 110, 063527, 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063527

    2024 doi

  121. [132]

    Goh, L. W. K., & Taylor, A. N. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 544, 3142, 10.1093/mnras/staf1927

    2025 doi

  122. [133]

    o k c en, M., Akarsu, \

    G \"o k c en, M., Akarsu, \"O ., & Di Valentino, E. 2026, Phys. Dark Univ., 52, 102273, 10.1016/j.dark.2026.102273

    2026

  123. [134]

    W., Green, D., & Meyers, J

    Graham, P. W., Green, D., & Meyers, J. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 043514, 10.1103/1bqb-qlrj

    2026 doi

  124. [135]

    2025, Phys

    Green, D., & Meyers, J. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 083507, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083507

    2025 doi

  125. [136]

    2014, Phys

    Gruber, C., & Luongo, O. 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 103506, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103506

    2014 doi

  126. [137]

    2025, Nature Astron., 9, 1879, 10.1038/s41550-025-02669-6

    Gu, G., et al. 2025, Nature Astron., 9, 1879, 10.1038/s41550-025-02669-6

    2025 doi

  127. [138]

    2013, JCAP, 02, 032, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032

    Gubitosi, G., Piazza, F., & Vernizzi, F. 2013, JCAP, 02, 032, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032

    2013 doi

  128. [139]

    2018, Sci

    Guo, J.-J., Zhang, J.-F., Li, Y.-H., He, D.-Z., & Zhang, X. 2018, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 61, 030011, 10.1007/s11433-017-9131-9

    2018 doi

  129. [140]

    2017, JCAP, 05, 040, 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/040

    Guo, R.-Y., Li, Y.-H., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2017, JCAP, 05, 040, 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/040

    2017 doi

  130. [141]

    2019, JCAP, 02, 054, 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/054

    Guo, R.-Y., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2019, JCAP, 02, 054, 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/054

    2019 doi

  131. [142]

    2005, Phys

    Guo, Z.-K., Piao, Y.-S., Zhang, X.-M., & Zhang, Y.-Z. 2005, Phys. Lett. B, 608, 177, 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.017

    2005 doi

  132. [143]

    2024, Phys

    Halder, S., de Haro, J., Saha, T., & Pan, S. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 083522, 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083522

    2024 doi

  133. [144]

    2009, Phys

    He, J.-H., Wang, B., & Abdalla, E. 2009, Phys. Lett. B, 671, 139, 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.062

    2009 doi

  134. [145]

    2025, Phys

    Herold, L., & Kamionkowski, M. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 083518, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083518

    2025 doi

  135. [146]

    A., Landim, R

    Hoerning, G. A., Landim, R. G., Ponte, L. O., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 023523, 10.1103/6zrh-8fmv

    2025 doi

  136. [147]

    o g a s, M., & M \

    H \"o g a s, M., & M \"o rtsell, E. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 103515, 10.1103/zz5k-kzzk

    2025 doi

  137. [148]

    2010, JCAP, 04, 007, 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/007

    Hojjati, A., Pogosian, L., & Zhao, G.-B. 2010, JCAP, 04, 007, 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/007

    2010 doi

  138. [149]

    2010 a , Phys

    Holsclaw, T., Alam, U., Sanso, B., et al. 2010 a , Phys. Rev. D, 82, 103502, 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.103502

    2010 doi

  139. [150]

    2010 b , Phys

    ---. 2010 b , Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 241302, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.241302

    2010 doi

  140. [151]

    2011, Phys

    ---. 2011, Phys. Rev. D, 84, 083501, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.083501

    2011 doi

  141. [152]

    2012, JCAP, 04, 027, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/04/027

    Howlett, C., Lewis, A., Hall, A., & Challinor, A. 2012, JCAP, 04, 027, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/04/027

    2012 doi

  142. [153]

    2023, Universe, 9, 94, 10.3390/universe9020094

    Hu, J.-P., & Wang, F.-Y. 2023, Universe, 9, 94, 10.3390/universe9020094

    2023 doi

  143. [154]

    2005, Phys

    Hu, W. 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 047301, 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.047301

    2005 doi

  144. [155]

    2025, Sci

    Huang, L., Cai, R.-G., & Wang, S.-J. 2025, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 68, 100413, 10.1007/s11433-025-2754-5

    2025 doi

  145. [156]

    2025, Mon

    Huang, Z. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 544, 2193, 10.1093/mnras/staf1892

    2025 doi

  146. [157]

    Huterer, D., & Shafer, D. L. 2018, Rept. Prog. Phys., 81, 016901, 10.1088/1361-6633/aa997e

    2018 doi

  147. [158]

    E., Jee, M

    Hwang, S.-g., L'Huillier, B., Keeley, R. E., Jee, M. J., & Shafieloo, A. 2023, JCAP, 02, 014, 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/014

    2023 doi

  148. [159]

    Ili \'c , S., Kopp, M., Skordis, C., & Thomas, D. B. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 043520, 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.043520

    2021 doi

  149. [160]

    2019, Living Rev

    Ishak, M. 2019, Living Rev. Rel., 22, 1, 10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4

    2019 doi

  150. [161]

    2025, JCAP, 09, 053, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/053

    Ishak, M., et al. 2025, JCAP, 09, 053, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/053

    2025 doi

  151. [162]

    M., Sullivan, J

    Ivanov, M. M., Sullivan, J. M., Chen, S.-F., et al. 2026. 2601.16165

    2026 arXiv

  152. [163]

    M., Toomey, M

    Ivanov, M. M., Toomey, M. W., & Kara c ayl , N. G. 2025, Phys. Rev. Lett., 134, 091001, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.091001

    2025 doi

  153. [164]

    K., Bagla, J

    Jassal, H. K., Bagla, J. S., & Padmanabhan, T. 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 72, 103503, 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.103503

    2005 doi

  154. [165]

    2026, Nature Astron., 10, 317, 10.1038/s41550-025-02737-x

    Jedamzik, K., Pogosian, L., & Abel, T. 2026, Nature Astron., 10, 317, 10.1038/s41550-025-02737-x

    2026 doi

  155. [166]

    Jhaveri, T., Karwal, T., Crawford, T., et al. 2026. 2604.08530

    2026 arXiv

  156. [167]

    2025, Phys

    Jhaveri, T., Karwal, T., & Hu, W. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 043541, 10.1103/6vd2-rbfn

    2025 doi

  157. [168]

    D., Hu, J

    Jia, X. D., Hu, J. P., Gao, D. H., Yi, S. X., & Wang, F. Y. 2025, Astrophys. J. Lett., 994, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1965

    2025 doi

  158. [169]

    2025, Phys

    Jiang, J.-Q. 2025, Phys. Dark Univ., 48, 101902, 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101902

    2025

  159. [170]

    S., & Vagnozzi, S

    Jiang, J.-Q., Pedrotti, D., da Costa, S. S., & Vagnozzi, S. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 123519, 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123519

    2024 doi

  160. [171]

    2025, JCAP, 01, 153, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153

    Jiang, J.-Q., Giar \`e , W., Gariazzo, S., et al. 2025, JCAP, 01, 153, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/153

    2025 doi

  161. [172]

    2026, Sci

    Jin, S.-J., Song, J.-Y., Sun, T.-Y., et al. 2026, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 69, 220401, 10.1007/s11433-025-2829-9

    2026 doi

  162. [173]

    2024, Sci

    Jin, S.-J., Zhang, Y.-Z., Song, J.-Y., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2024, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 67, 220412, 10.1007/s11433-023-2276-1

    2024 doi

  163. [174]

    Kamionkowski, M., & Riess, A. G. 2023, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 73, 153, 10.1146/annurev-nucl-111422-024107

    2023 doi

  164. [175]

    Kang, Y., Li, M., & Yi, C. 2026. 2602.00506

    2026 arXiv

  165. [176]

    S., Swagat Mishra, S., & Sahoo, P

    Kavya, N. S., Swagat Mishra, S., & Sahoo, P. K. 2025, Sci. Rep., 15, 36504, 10.1038/s41598-025-23502-0

    2025 doi

  166. [177]

    A., Escamilla, L

    Kessler, D. A., Escamilla, L. A., Pan, S., & Di Valentino, E. 2025. 2504.00776

    2025 arXiv

  167. [178]

    R., et al

    Khalife, A. R., et al. 2025, 10.1103/8jjr-7hpb

    2025 doi

  168. [179]

    Khandelwal, S., Capistrano, A. J. S., Kumar, S., & Nunes, R. C. 2026. 2605.20748

    2026 arXiv

  169. [180]

    2025, Phys

    Khoury, J., Lin, M.-X., & Trodden, M. 2025, Phys. Rev. Lett., 135, 181001, 10.1103/w4qb-plk8

    2025 doi

  170. [181]

    K br s, C., Elbers, W., Akarsu, \"O ., & Di Valentino, E. 2026. 2605.21456

    2026 arXiv

  171. [182]

    B., & Ili \'c , S

    Kopp, M., Skordis, C., Thomas, D. B., & Ili \'c , S. 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 221102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.221102

    2018 doi

  172. [183]

    2016, Rept

    Koyama, K. 2016, Rept. Prog. Phys., 79, 046902, 10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902

    2016 doi

  173. [184]

    Kumar, S., & Nunes, R. C. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 103511, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103511

    2017 doi

  174. [185]

    Kumar, U., Ajith, A., & Verma, A. 2025. 2504.14419

    2025 arXiv

  175. [186]

    2026, Astron

    Labate, A., Guidi, M., Moresco, M., & Veropalumbo, A. 2026, Astron. Astrophys., 708, A210, 10.1051/0004-6361/202558719

    2026 doi

  176. [187]

    C., Pan, S., & Yang, W

    Ladeira, A., Nunes, R. C., Pan, S., & Yang, W. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 083503, 10.1103/q1ng-2xvp

    2026 doi

  177. [188]

    2025, Nature Astron., 9, 1123, 10.1038/s41550-025-02627-2

    Leauthaud, A., & Riess, A. 2025, Nature Astron., 9, 1123, 10.1038/s41550-025-02627-2

    2025 doi

  178. [189]

    H., Yang, W., Di Valentino, E., Pan, S., & van de Bruck, C

    Lee, D. H., Yang, W., Di Valentino, E., Pan, S., & van de Bruck, C. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 063554, 10.1103/z7y2-yvhg

    2026 doi

  179. [190]

    2025, Phys

    Lee, N., Braglia, M., & Ali-Ha \" moud, Y. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 083506, 10.1103/9q3f-5zrd

    2025 doi

  180. [191]

    2026, JCAP, 03, 003, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/003

    Legner, S., Handley, W., Barker, W., & Ormondroyd, A. 2026, JCAP, 03, 003, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/003

    2026 doi

  181. [192]

    2000, Astrophys

    Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. 2000, Astrophys. J., 538, 473, 10.1086/309179

    2000 doi

  182. [193]

    N., & Cai, Y.-F

    Li, C., Ren, X., Yang, Y., Saridakis, E. N., & Cai, Y.-F. 2025 a . 2512.16551

    2025 arXiv

  183. [194]

    2025 b , JCAP, 07, 056, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/056

    Li, H.-H., Zhang, X.-z., Qiu, T., & Xia, J.-Q. 2025 b , JCAP, 07, 056, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/056

    2025 doi

  184. [195]

    2026, Mon

    Li, J.-X., & Wang, S. 2026, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 548, 1, 10.1093/mnras/stag584

    2026 doi

  185. [196]

    2013, JCAP, 09, 021, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/021

    Li, M., Li, X.-D., Ma, Y.-Z., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. 2013, JCAP, 09, 021, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/021

    2013 doi

  186. [197]

    Li, T.-N., Du, G.-H., Li, Y.-H., et al. 2025 c . 2510.11363

    2025

  187. [198]

    2026 a , Sci

    ---. 2026 a , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 69, 210413, 10.1007/s11433-025-2771-5

    2026 doi

  188. [199]

    2026 b , Phys

    Li, T.-N., Du, G.-H., Zhou, S.-H., et al. 2026 b , Phys. Dark Univ., 52, 102254, 10.1016/j.dark.2026.102254

    2026

  189. [200]

    Li, T.-N., Giar \`e , W., Du, G.-H., et al. 2026 c . 2601.07361

    2026 arXiv

  190. [201]

    2024 a , Astrophys

    Li, T.-N., Jin, S.-J., Li, H.-L., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2024 a , Astrophys. J., 963, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bc9

    2024 doi

  191. [202]

    2025 d , Eur

    Li, T.-N., Li, Y.-H., Du, G.-H., et al. 2025 d , Eur. Phys. J. C, 85, 608, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14279-7

    2025 doi

  192. [203]

    2024 b , Astrophys

    Li, T.-N., Wu, P.-J., Du, G.-H., et al. 2024 b , Astrophys. J., 976, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad87f0

    2024 doi

  193. [204]

    2025 e , Phys

    ---. 2025 e , Phys. Dark Univ., 50, 102068, 10.1016/j.dark.2025.102068

    2025

  194. [205]

    2025 f , JCAP, 12, 048, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/048

    Li, T.-N., Zhang, Y.-M., Yao, Y.-H., et al. 2025 f , JCAP, 12, 048, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/048

    2025 doi

  195. [206]

    2026 d , Astrophys

    Li, X., Liu, T., Li, T.-N., et al. 2026 d , Astrophys. J. Lett., 1001, L21, 10.3847/2041-8213/ae5a36

    2026 doi

  196. [207]

    2019, Astrophys

    Li, X., & Shafieloo, A. 2019, Astrophys. J. Lett., 883, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3e09

    2019 doi

  197. [208]

    2020, Astrophys

    ---. 2020, Astrophys. J., 902, 58, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb3d0

    2020 doi

  198. [209]

    2012, Sci

    Li, X.-D., Wang, S., Huang, Q.-G., Zhang, X., & Li, M. 2012, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 55, 1330, 10.1007/s11433-012-4748-z

    2012 doi

  199. [210]

    2014, Phys

    Li, Y.-H., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 90, 063005, 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.063005

    2014 doi

  200. [211]

    2016, Phys

    ---. 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 93, 023002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.023002

    2016 doi

  201. [212]

    2011, Eur

    Li, Y.-H., & Zhang, X. 2011, Eur. Phys. J. C, 71, 1700, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1700-8

    2011 doi

  202. [213]

    2014, Phys

    ---. 2014, Phys. Rev. D, 89, 083009, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083009

    2014 doi

  203. [214]

    2023, JCAP, 09, 046, 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/09/046

    ---. 2023, JCAP, 09, 046, 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/09/046

    2023 doi

  204. [215]

    2025, JCAP, 12, 018, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/018

    ---. 2025, JCAP, 12, 018, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/018

    2025 doi

  205. [216]

    Linder, E. V. 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 091301, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301

    2003 doi

  206. [217]

    2025, Phys

    Ling, J.-L., Du, G.-H., Li, T.-N., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 083528, 10.1103/p8nz-djjm

    2025 doi

  207. [218]

    Liu, G., Wang, Y., & Zhao, W. 2024. 2407.04385

    2024 arXiv

  208. [219]

    Liu, L., Yi, Z., & Gong, Y. 2025 a . 2505.02407

    2025 arXiv

  209. [220]

    2025 b , Phys

    Liu, T., Cao, S., & Wang, J. 2025 b , Phys. Rev. D, 112, 123539, 10.1103/3c2h-g7cz

    2025 doi

  210. [221]

    2025 c , Astrophys

    Liu, T., Li, X., & Wang, J. 2025 c , Astrophys. J., 988, 243, 10.3847/1538-4357/aded8b

    2025 doi

  211. [222]

    2025, Phys

    Lodha, K., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 083511, 10.1103/w4c6-1r5j

    2025 doi

  212. [223]

    Loverde, M., & Weiner, Z. J. 2024, JCAP, 12, 048, 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/048

    2024 doi

  213. [224]

    Lucca, M., & Hooper, D. C. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 123502, 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123502

    2020 doi

  214. [225]

    2026, Phys

    Lyu, Z.-H., Cai, R.-G., Wang, S.-J., & Zeng, X.-X. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 083041, 10.1103/rmgx-rp87

    2026 doi

  215. [226]

    2011, Phys

    Ma, J.-Z., & Zhang, X. 2011, Phys. Lett. B, 699, 233, 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.013

    2011 doi

  216. [227]

    2008, Phys

    Ma, Y.-Z., & Zhang, X. 2008, Phys. Lett. B, 661, 239, 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.02.028

    2008 doi

  217. [228]

    2025, Phys

    Malekjani, M., Davari, Z., & Pourojaghi, S. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 083547, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083547

    2025 doi

  218. [229]

    R., Pacif, S

    Mishra, K. R., Pacif, S. K. J., Kumar, R., & Bamba, K. 2023, Phys. Dark Univ., 40, 101211, 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101211

    2023

  219. [230]

    A., Carlevaro, N., & Di Valentino, E

    Montani, G., Escamilla, L. A., Carlevaro, N., & Di Valentino, E. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 023507, 10.1103/mn69-1dn6

    2026 doi

  220. [231]

    Montefalcone, G., & Stiskalek, R. 2026. 2603.25735

    2026

  221. [232]

    Muller, C. M. 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 047302, 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.047302

    2005 doi

  222. [233]

    2016, JCAP, 04, 014, 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/014

    Murgia, R., Gariazzo, S., & Fornengo, N. 2016, JCAP, 04, 014, 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/014

    2016 doi

  223. [234]

    A., Banik, I., Desmond, H., & Kalaitzidis, V

    N \'a jera, J. A., Banik, I., Desmond, H., & Kalaitzidis, V. 2026, Galaxies, 14, 19, 10.3390/galaxies14020019

    2026 doi

  224. [235]

    2025, Phys

    Namikawa, T. 2025, Phys. Rev. Lett., 135, 161004, 10.1103/qgnn-6hsf

    2025 doi

  225. [236]

    2024, Phys

    Naredo-Tuero, D., Escudero, M., Fern \'a ndez-Mart \' nez, E., Marcano, X., & Poulin, V. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 123537, 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123537

    2024 doi

  226. [237]

    C., & Di Valentino, E

    Nunes, R. C., & Di Valentino, E. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 063529, 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063529

    2021 doi

  227. [238]

    C., Pan, S., & Saridakis, E

    Nunes, R. C., Pan, S., & Saridakis, E. N. 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 023508, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023508

    2016 doi

  228. [239]

    Ong, D. D. Y., Yallup, D., & Handley, W. 2026. 2603.05472

    2026 arXiv

  229. [240]

    N., Handley, W

    Ormondroyd, A. N., Handley, W. J., Hobson, M. P., & Lasenby, A. N. 2025. 2503.17342

    2025 arXiv

  230. [241]

    \"O z \"u lker, E., Di Valentino, E., & Giar \`e , W. 2025. 2506.19053

    2025 arXiv

  231. [242]

    2026, Phys

    Pan, J., & Ye, G. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, L041304, 10.1103/hqwq-m19h

    2026 doi

  232. [243]

    N., & Yang, W

    Pan, S., Paul, S., Saridakis, E. N., & Yang, W. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 023515, 10.1103/5y21-k39n

    2026 doi

  233. [244]

    2023, 10.1007/978-981-99-0177-7\_29

    Pan, S., & Yang, W. 2023, 10.1007/978-981-99-0177-7\_29

    2023 doi

  234. [245]

    2020, Eur

    Pan, S., Yang, W., & Paliathanasis, A. 2020, Eur. Phys. J. C, 80, 274, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7832-y

    2020 doi

  235. [246]

    2025 a , Sci

    Pang, Y.-H., Zhang, X., & Huang, Q.-G. 2025 a , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 68, 280410, 10.1007/s11433-025-2713-8

    2025 doi

  236. [247]

    2025 b , JCAP, 04, 057, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/057

    ---. 2025 b , JCAP, 04, 057, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/057

    2025 doi

  237. [248]

    2026 a , Phys

    Pantos, I., & Perivolaropoulos, L. 2026 a , Phys. Dark Univ., 52, 102286, 10.1016/j.dark.2026.102286

    2026

  238. [249]

    2026 b , Phys

    ---. 2026 b , Phys. Dark Univ., 52, 102347, 10.1016/j.dark.2026.102347

    2026

  239. [250]

    ---. 2026 c . 2601.00650

    2026

  240. [251]

    Pedrotti, D. 2026. 2604.25813

    2026 arXiv

  241. [252]

    A., Marra, V., Perivolaropoulos, L., & Vagnozzi, S

    Pedrotti, D., Escamilla, L. A., Marra, V., Perivolaropoulos, L., & Vagnozzi, S. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 043507, 10.1103/pn9j-8whx

    2026 doi

  242. [253]

    2025, Phys

    Peng, Z.-Y., Jiang, J.-Q., Wang, H., & Piao, Y.-S. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 123519, 10.1103/ys4m-3qws

    2025 doi

  243. [254]

    2022, New Astron

    Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. 2022, New Astron. Rev., 95, 101659, 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659

    2022

  244. [255]

    1999, Astrophys

    Perlmutter, S., et al. 1999, Astrophys. J., 517, 565, 10.1086/307221

    1999 doi

  245. [256]

    2025, Eur

    Plaza, F., Le \'o n, G., & Kraiselburd, L. 2025, Eur. Phys. J. C, 85, 1262, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14995-0

    2025 doi

  246. [257]

    2026, Mon

    Popovic, B., et al. 2026, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 548, stag632, 10.1093/mnras/stag632

    2026 doi

  247. [258]

    L., Calder \'o n, R., & Simon, T

    Poulin, V., Smith, T. L., Calder \'o n, R., & Simon, T. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 083552, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083552

    2025 doi

  248. [259]

    2026, Phys

    ---. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 063519, 10.1103/bx25-1g5d

    2026 doi

  249. [260]

    L., Karwal, T., & Kamionkowski, M

    Poulin, V., Smith, T. L., Karwal, T., & Kamionkowski, M. 2019, Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 221301, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221301

    2019 doi

  250. [261]

    2016, Phys

    Pourtsidou, A., & Tram, T. 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 043518, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.043518

    2016 doi

  251. [262]

    Pulido-Hern \'a ndez, H., & Cervantes-Cota, J. L. 2026. 2603.13208

    2026

  252. [263]

    2026, Chin

    Qiu, T.-t., Cai, Y., Liu, Y., et al. 2026, Chin. Phys. C, 50, 012001, 10.1088/1674-1137/ae30e9

    2026 doi

  253. [264]

    J., Surrao, K

    Qu, F. J., Surrao, K. M., Bolliet, B., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 123507, 10.1103/xhh6-9v62

    2025 doi

  254. [265]

    2025, Phys

    Racco, D., Zhang, P., & Zheng, H. 2025, Phys. Dark Univ., 47, 101803, 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101803

    2025

  255. [266]

    Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. 1988, Phys. Rev. D, 37, 3406, 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406

    1988 doi

  256. [267]

    2026, Phys

    Reeves, A., Ferraro, S., Nicola, A., & Refregier, A. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 103512, 10.1103/w737-nk6r

    2026 doi

  257. [268]

    2026, Astron

    Reischke, R., et al. 2026, Astron. Astrophys., 709, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/202558581

    2026 doi

  258. [269]

    G., et al

    Riess, A. G., et al. 1998, Astron. J., 116, 1009, 10.1086/300499

    1998 doi

  259. [270]

    2022, Astrophys

    ---. 2022, Astrophys. J. Lett., 934, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b

    2022 doi

  260. [271]

    2025, JCAP, 08, 016, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/016

    Rodrigues, G., de Souza, R., Rodrigues, J., & Alcaniz, J. 2025, JCAP, 08, 016, 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/016

    2025 doi

  261. [272]

    2025, Astrophys

    Roy Choudhury, S. 2025, Astrophys. J. Lett., 986, L31, 10.3847/2041-8213/ade1cc

    2025 doi

  262. [273]

    2018, JCAP, 09, 017, 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/017

    Roy Choudhury, S., & Choubey, S. 2018, JCAP, 09, 017, 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/017

    2018 doi

  263. [274]

    Ruchika, Mukherjee, P., & Favale, A. 2025. 2510.03742

    2025

  264. [275]

    A., Silva, E., Nunes, R

    Sabogal, M. A., Silva, E., Nunes, R. C., Kumar, S., & Di Valentino, E. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 043531, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043531

    2025 doi

  265. [276]

    Sahni, V., & Starobinsky, A. A. 2000, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 9, 373, 10.1142/S0218271800000542

    2000 doi

  266. [277]

    S., Ferraro, S., & White, M

    Sailer, N., Farren, G. S., Ferraro, S., & White, M. 2026, Phys. Rev. Lett., 136, 081002, 10.1103/6r54-8lv4

    2026 doi

  267. [278]

    2020, Phys

    Sakstein, J., & Trodden, M. 2020, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 161301, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.161301

    2020 doi

  268. [279]

    2013, Phys

    Salvatelli, V., Marchini, A., Lopez-Honorez, L., & Mena, O. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 88, 023531, 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.023531

    2013 doi

  269. [280]

    Sanchez G., I. E. 2014, Gen. Rel. Grav., 46, 1769, 10.1007/s10714-014-1769-0

    2014 doi

  270. [281]

    2025, Phys

    Sapone, D., & Nesseris, S. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 063523, 10.1103/yknm-xskb

    2025 doi

  271. [282]

    A., Montani, G., & Di Valentino, E

    Schiavone, T., De Angelis, M., Escamilla, L. A., Montani, G., & Di Valentino, E. 2026. 2601.14222

    2026 arXiv

  272. [283]

    2022, Phys

    Sch \"o neberg, N., Franco Abell \'a n, G., P \'e rez S \'a nchez, A., et al. 2022, Phys. Rept., 984, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.07.001

    2022 doi

  273. [284]

    2024, Phys

    Seto, O., & Toda, Y. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 110, 083501, 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083501

    2024 doi

  274. [285]

    2021, Astron

    Shah, P., Lemos, P., & Lahav, O. 2021, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 29, 9, 10.1007/s00159-021-00137-4

    2021 doi

  275. [286]

    2025, Mon

    Shah, R., Mukherjee, P., & Pal, S. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 542, 2936, 10.1093/mnras/staf1442

    2025 doi

  276. [287]

    J., Dunkley, J., et al

    Shao, H., Givans, J. J., Dunkley, J., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 083535, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083535

    2025 doi

  277. [288]

    K., & Lesgourgues, J

    Sharma, R. K., & Lesgourgues, J. 2026, JCAP, 02, 034, 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/034

    2026 doi

  278. [289]

    Shlivko, D., & Poulin, V. 2026. 2603.22406

    2026

  279. [290]

    A., Scherer, M., et al

    Silva, E., Sabogal, M. A., Scherer, M., et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 123511, 10.1103/qqc6-76z4

    2025 doi

  280. [291]

    Sim \ o es, L. N. L., Naidoo, K., Joachimi, B., Elbers, W., & Frenk, C. S. 2025. 2512.16517

    2025 arXiv

  281. [292]

    P., & Di Valentino, E

    Smith, A., Mylova, M., van de Bruck, C., Burgess, C. P., & Di Valentino, E. 2025. 2512.13544

    2025

  282. [293]

    2026, Sci

    Song, J.-Y., Du, G.-H., Li, T.-N., et al. 2026, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 69, 240413, 10.1007/s11433-025-2888-0

    2026 doi

  283. [294]

    2025, Astrophys

    Song, J.-Y., Qi, J.-Z., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. 2025, Astrophys. J. Lett., 985, L44, 10.3847/2041-8213/add999

    2025 doi

  284. [295]

    2024, Sci

    Song, J.-Y., Wang, L.-F., Li, Y., et al. 2024, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 67, 230411, 10.1007/s11433-023-2260-2

    2024 doi

  285. [296]

    A., Ozulker, E., et al

    Specogna, E., Adil, S. A., Ozulker, E., et al. 2025. 2504.17859

    2025 arXiv

  286. [297]

    N., et al

    Spergel, D. N., et al. 2003, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 148, 175, 10.1086/377226

    2003 doi

  287. [298]

    2025, Mon

    Stiskalek, R., Desmond, H., & Banik, I. 2025, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 543, 1556, 10.1093/mnras/staf1571

    2025 doi

  288. [299]

    J., Pandey, S., et al

    Sui, C., Bartlett, D. J., Pandey, S., et al. 2025, Astron. Astrophys., 698, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452854

    2025 doi

  289. [300]

    Tamayo, D., & Vazquez, J. A. 2019, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 487, 729, 10.1093/mnras/stz1229

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.