Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 6 cited by

De Sitter quantum gravity within the covariant Lorentzian approach to asymptotic safety

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On de Sitter spacetime, the Lorentzian renormalization group flow of Einstein gravity possesses a non-Gaussian ultraviolet fixed point for the standard gauges, evidence for asymptotically safe quantum gravity.

desk verdict First de Sitter FRG flow in covariant Lorentzian asymptotic safety with genuinely reusable massive Hadamard propagators, but the harmonic-gauge fixed point the paper advertises rests on formulas parked in an unpublished companion. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05135 v2 pith:DOKXUHO6 submitted 2025-02-07 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Edoardo D'Angelo , Renata Ferrero , Markus B. Fröb This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords asymptoticsafetydeSitterspacetimefunctionalrenormalizationgroupLorentzianquantumgravitySitter-invariantHadamardstateEinstein-HilberttruncationHiguchiboundCallan-Symanzikregulator
topics Quantum Gravity
open problems Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives, for the first time, the functional renormalization group flow of Lorentzian Einstein gravity on a de Sitter background, in the Einstein-Hilbert truncation and in the de Sitter-invariant Hadamard vacuum state. It shows that, for the two most common gauge families, $\zeta=\frac12$ and harmonic gauges with $\zeta=1$, the flow possesses a non-Gaussian ultraviolet fixed point over a range of the Hadamard-scale parameter $\alpha$ and gauge parameter $\xi$, with complex critical exponents whose real part is positive for standard choices such as $\xi=1$, $\alpha\approx0.4$. The authors take this as evidence that asymptotically safe quantum gravity is realized in de Sitter spacetime, a key cosmological background, and that the state dependence inherent to Lorentzian quantum gravity can be handled covariantly. The computation relies on new massive scalar, vector, and tensor Feynman propagators in de Sitter that satisfy the Hadamard condition.

What carries the argument

The engine is the Lorentzian functional renormalization group equation (2.13) with a mass-like Callan-Symanzik regulator, combined with the local potential approximation, in which the interacting propagator is taken to be the free Feynman propagator of massive fields with masses $m^2=k^2+2(3H^2-\Lambda_k)$ and $M^2=k^2(3-2/\xi\zeta^2)+2(3H^2-\Lambda_k)$. The right-hand side is the coincidence limit of the Hadamard-normal-ordered propagator of the graviton and ghost fields, evaluated with the newly derived de Sitter-invariant Hadamard propagators for massive scalars, vectors, and tensors. Hadamard subtraction removes the universal UV divergences and introduces the scale parameter $\alpha=\ell k$, while the vacuum state fixes the quantum-state dependence. Comparing coefficients of order $H^0$ and $H^2$ on both sides of the flow equation yields the $\beta$ functions of $g_k=G_{N,k}k^2$ and $\lambda_k=\Lambda_k/k^2$.

What would settle it

Extend the effective average action by an $R^2$ or Weyl-squared coupling and search for a simultaneous non-Gaussian fixed point of $(g,\lambda,a_2)$ with the same state and regulator; if no such fixed point exists, or if the Einstein-Hilbert fixed point moves discontinuously, the reported UV completion is a truncation artifact rather than a property of the full theory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the non-perturbative RG flow for Lorentzian quantum gravity in de Sitter space, evaluated in the Einstein-Hilbert truncation with the de Sitter-invariant Hadamard vacuum, admits a non-trivial UV fixed point $(g_*,\lambda_*)$ for the gauges $\zeta=\frac12$ and $\zeta=1$. For $\xi=1$ and $\alpha\approx0.4$, the critical exponents are complex conjugates with positive real part, so the fixed point attracts the flow in the UV; the authors interpret this as evidence for the UV completion of gravity in de Sitter space. The flow is constrained by the Higuchi bound, which forces $\lambda_k\le\frac12$ and creates an asymptote near which numerical evaluation becomes delicate. The fixed point's location depends on the Hadamard scale $\alpha=\ell k$, but the critical exponents vary only mildly and remain close to the known Euclidean results for the most common gauges.

Load-bearing premise

The flow is computed entirely in the Einstein-Hilbert truncation with the interacting propagator approximated by the free massive Feynman propagator; if curvature-squared or higher-order operators, or corrections beyond this local-potential approximation, contribute significantly, the ultraviolet fixed point could be an artifact of this truncation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, asymptotic safety is realized in a Lorentzian, cosmological setting, not only in Euclidean signature, and a de Sitter-invariant Hadamard vacuum provides a viable state for the UV-complete graviton.
  • The Higuchi bound $\lambda_k\le\frac12$ is a physical obstruction to global RG trajectories in this truncation; including matter fields or higher-order terms may lift it and allow IR-complete flows.
  • The state dependence of the flow means different vacua can change the phase diagram, so asymptotic safety must be assessed state by state in curved spacetimes.
  • The gauge and Hadamard-scale dependence of the fixed point can in principle be minimized by choosing $\alpha=\alpha(\xi,\zeta)$, yielding approximately scheme-independent critical exponents.
  • The same covariant Lorentzian flow equations can be applied to other backgrounds, such as anti-de Sitter or FLRW with a scalar field, and to gauge-invariant cosmological observables.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed point survives higher-order truncations, one could search for a function $\alpha(\xi)$ that makes all critical exponents exactly gauge-independent; the figures in the paper suggest this is a concrete numerical project.
  • The Hadamard-subtraction technique could be applied to other homogeneous spacetimes, such as FLRW with a scalar source, connecting asymptotic safety directly to inflationary cosmology.
  • A potential observational consequence, if an IR fixed point is eventually identified, is a prediction for the scale dependence of the effective cosmological constant that could be compared with CMB and large-scale-structure data; the paper gestures at this but does not compute it.
  • A different choice of vacuum state could move the fixed point away from the Higuchi asymptote, making global UV-to-IR trajectories numerically accessible; testing this is a natural next step within the same framework.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Lorentzian, state-dependent functional renormalization group for quantum gravity on de Sitter spacetime. It constructs Hadamard Feynman propagators for massive scalar, vector and tensor fields in the Bunch-Davies vacuum, including a two-parameter gauge family, and uses their coincidence limits to project the FRGE onto the Einstein-Hilbert truncation. The flow is computed for the gauges ζ=1/2 and ζ=1 as a function of the gauge parameter ξ and the Hadamard scale α=ℓk; the numerical beta-function analysis yields non-Gaussian UV fixed points and complex critical exponents for a range of parameters. The authors conclude that this provides evidence for asymptotic safety of Lorentzian Einstein gravity in de Sitter space.

Significance. If the computation is correct, this is a substantial step: it is the first covariant Lorentzian FRG calculation on a cosmological background in the Einstein-Hilbert truncation, it treats state dependence and Hadamard subtraction explicitly, and it makes concrete statements about gauge and scheme dependence. The paper supplies explicit propagator coincidence limits for the ζ=1/2 case in Eqs. (4.10) and (4.11), and the qualitative comparison with the Euclidean Einstein-Hilbert fixed point is useful. The strength of the claim, however, is limited by the fact that the harmonic-gauge (ζ=1) beta functions and the general-gauge tensor propagator are deferred to an unpublished companion paper, so the main numerical evidence for the headline claim cannot be independently checked from the manuscript alone.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.3 and Sec. 4.4] The central harmonic-gauge claim, Figs. 9-16, is not checkable from the manuscript. The ζ=1 graviton propagator is not given: Sec. 3.3 states that 'The full expressions for the propagator in a general gauge can be found in Ref. [74]', and Sec. 4.4 does not display the corresponding β_g and β_λ functions. The existence of the non-Gaussian fixed point and the sign of the real part of the critical exponents are numerical outputs of exactly those omitted expressions; an algebraic error in the O(H²) projection or in the tensor propagator would move or destroy the fixed point. The ζ=1 propagator coincidence limits, or the resulting beta functions, must be included or made available as an ancillary file before the central claim can be assessed.
  2. [Sec. 4.3] Even for the ζ=1/2 case, after displaying the propagator inputs (4.10) and (4.11), the paper states that the β functions are 'long and unwieldy ... we do not report them explicitly'. The flow diagrams and the PDE-continued fixed-point curves in Figs. 1-8 are therefore not reproducible from the text. Since the fixed point and critical exponents are the main quantitative results, at least one explicit β_g,β_λ pair for a representative choice of (ξ,α), or a supplementary file with all beta functions, is required.
  3. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 4.2] The interacting propagator entering the FRGE (2.13) is taken to be the free Feynman propagator with shifted masses (4.7), i.e., the local potential approximation is applied to the tensor sector without a dedicated check. Because the UV fixed point may be an artifact of the Einstein-Hilbert truncation, the manuscript should provide at least a qualitative estimate of the size of R² or Weyl² contributions on the right-hand side, or explain more precisely why the LPA is expected to capture the tensor sector.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.6)] The regulator q_k in Eq. (4.6) is proportional to 1/G_N,k, so k∂_k q_k contains anomalous-dimension terms proportional to η. Because the beta functions are not reported, the reader cannot verify that these terms were consistently included in the numerical solution. The manuscript should state explicitly how η enters the right-hand side of Eq. (2.13) for this regulator, or display at least one beta function in which this dependence can be seen.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.3] The definition 'η = ∂k lngk−2' appears to omit the factor k in the derivative; if η is the standard anomalous dimension, it should read η = k∂_k ln g_k − 2.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The constant c′ in the vector propagator (3.20) is set to zero 'for simplicity'; since it is a free parameter of the construction, its effect on the flow should be mentioned at least briefly.
  3. [Sec. 5] The comparison with causal dynamical triangulations is only qualitative; the sentence that the results 'could be compared' is vague and no quantitative connection is established.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The ζ=1 harmonic-gauge UV fixed point rests on unshown formulas delegated to the authors' in-preparation companion [74]; the ζ=1/2 sector is independently presented.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 3.3 (after Eq. (3.54)) and Sec. 4.4 (Figs. 9–16)]
    "The full expressions for the propagator in a general gauge can be found in Ref. [74]. ... As for the previous gauge ζ = 1/2, we find a non-trivial UV fixed point also in harmonic gauge whose exact location depends on the other parameters ξ and α, and which is shown in Fig. 9."

    For ζ=1, the paper gives no general-gauge graviton propagator and no beta functions: Sec. 3.3 ends with the pointer to [74], and Sec. 4.4 does not display the β functions. The claimed ζ=1 UV fixed point and critical exponents (Figs. 9–16) are numerical outputs of exactly those omitted expressions. The derivation chain for the harmonic-gauge sector therefore reduces to an in-preparation companion by the same authors rather than to equations checkable in this paper; under the stated standards this is not independent support. Because the ζ=1/2 flow and fixed point are presented with explicit propagator coincidences (Eqs. (4.10)–(4.11)), the circularity is partial and confined to the most-common-gauge branch of the main claim.

full rationale

No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the dimensionless couplings g_k and λ_k are not adjusted to force the fixed point, and the non-Gaussian fixed point arises from solving β_i(g,λ)=0 over a range of α and ξ. The scalar/vector/tensor propagator computations and Hadamard coincidence limits are shown in the text for the ζ=1/2 case, making that sector self-contained up to the quoted beta functions. The only load-bearing appeal to the authors' own unpublished work is the general-gauge (especially ζ=1) tensor propagator and the resulting beta functions, which are essential to the harmonic-gauge fixed point that is advertised as the most common-gauge result. This is a verification gap and partial self-citation load, not a formal equation-level circularity: no displayed equation is identical to an input by construction. The score reflects that the central ζ=1/2 evidence is independent, while part of the central claim (harmonic gauge) is not checkable from the paper and rests on [74].

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's fixed-point claim rests on the Einstein-Hilbert/LPA truncation, the Bunch-Davies state, the Callan-Symanzik regulator construction, the gauge choices, and the still-unpublished companion propagator paper. The three scanned parameters (α, ξ, ζ) are chosen by hand, not fitted to data; no empirical data enter the calculation.

free parameters (4)
  • Hadamard scale α = ℓ k = varied: 1/3, 2/5, 1/2, 2/3; admissible intervals e.g. 0.1 ≲ α ≲ 0.64 for ζ=1
    Introduced by Hadamard normal-ordering subtraction (Secs. 2.1, 3.4); the fixed point position and critical exponents depend on it and it is not determined inside the paper.
  • Gauge parameter ξ = varied; main runs at ξ=1, explored up to ξ=3
    Gauge-fixing parameter in the action (2.2); the flow, fixed point and exponents depend on it, and the admissible range is restricted by the Higuchi-bound asymptote and negative-norm modes.
  • Gauge parameter ζ = ζ=1/2 and ζ=1
    Second gauge-fixing parameter; only the two most common families are studied, and the general-gauge expressions are deferred to the companion [74].
  • Constant c' in the vector propagator = 0
    In Sec. 3.2 the authors choose c'=0 in GB 'for simplicity' after imposing the Hadamard form; this is a residual finite freedom whose effect on the flow is not explored.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The effective average action is restricted to the Einstein-Hilbert truncation (4.3), with running GN,k and Λk and gauge/ghost terms of the same form as the classical action.
    Explicit in Sec. 4.2; all beta-function results are conditional on this truncation.
  • domain assumption In the local potential approximation, the interacting propagator G_k equals the free Feynman propagator with mass terms shifted by the regulator, as described in Sec. 2.1.
    Used to convert the FRGE into a computation with massive propagators; if the LPA fails for gravitons, the flow equations change.
  • domain assumption The massive graviton and ghost Feynman propagators in general gauge (ξ, ζ) are Hadamard and of the form stated, with derivations in the companion paper [74].
    The paper gives an overview and final formulas, but the full derivation and general-gauge coefficients are deferred to [74], which is in preparation.
  • domain assumption The regulator is the mass-like Callan-Symanzik term (4.6)-(4.8), dressing ∇² to ∇²-k², and the resulting flow has the UV and IR limits described in Sec. 2.
    This is the framework of [24,25,26]; the identification of k as a physical mass scale rather than a Wilsonian cutoff is a nontrivial interpretive assumption.
  • domain assumption The Bunch-Davies vacuum is the unique de Sitter-invariant Hadamard state for the massive fields and is the correct reference state for the flow.
    Assumed in Sec. 3 and used throughout; the state dependence of the Lorentzian FRG means a different state could change the phase diagram.
  • domain assumption Unitarity imposes the Higuchi bound m² ≥ 2H², yielding λ_k ≤ 1/2 and restricting the admissible flow region.
    Invoked in Secs. 4.3 and 4.4 to explain the asymptote and to restrict the ranges of α and ξ.
  • standard math Standard hypergeometric and Hadamard expansion identities, de Sitter bitensor calculus, and the DeWitt-Brehme expansion are used.
    Used throughout Sec. 3; these are standard mathematical background results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of De Sitter quantum gravity within the covariant Lorentzian approach to asymptotic safety." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DOKXUHO6

@misc{pith2026250205135,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: De Sitter quantum gravity within the covariant Lorentzian approach to asymptotic safety},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DOKXUHO6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05135}
}
read the original abstract

Recent technical and conceptual advancements in the asymptotic safety approach to quantum gravity have enabled studies of the UV completion of Lorentzian Einstein gravity, emphasizing the role of the state dependence. We present here the first complete investigation of the flow equations of the Einstein-Hilbert action within a cosmological spacetime, namely de Sitter spacetime. Using the newly derived graviton propagator for general gauges and masses in de Sitter spacetime, we analyze the dependence on the gauge and on finite renormalization parameters. Our results provide evidence of a UV fixed point for the most commonly used gauges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards gauge independence in asymptotically safe quantum gravity

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In an essential proper-time scheme, gauge dependence of the flow for Newton's constant cancels order-by-order once redundant off-shell terms are absorbed by field redefinitions, leaving a gauge-independent non-Gaussia...

  2. Self-consistent graviton spectral function in Lorentzian quantum gravity

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-consistent spectral renormalisation group computation yields a positive, normalizable graviton spectral function with a massless pole and a multi-graviton continuum decaying as 1/(λ² log³ λ²).

  3. Quark and lepton mixing in the asymptotically safe Standard Model

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fixed-point cascade in the asymptotically safe Standard Model predicts the near-diagonal CKM structure with two different precisions and preserves large PMNS mixing by dynamically suppressing neutrino Yukawa couplings.

  4. Matter Spectral Functions from Quantum Gravity

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under asymptotically safe quantum gravity, photon and scalar propagators acquire Källén-Lehmann spectral functions that are non-normalizable and change sign in the ultraviolet.

  5. The one-loop effective action from the coherent state path integral of loop quantum gravity

    gr-qc 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The one-loop effective action from the LQG coherent state path integral is computed and found to be UV-finite, with the dynamical area j0 > 0 at the quantum level.

  6. $e^+ e^- \to \mu^+ \mu^-$ in the Asymptotically Safe Standard Model

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using reconstructed timelike graviton spectral functions, the authors find that the e+e- to mu+mu- cross-section in the asymptotically safe Standard Model falls as 1/s in the ultraviolet and is compatible with unitarity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [74]

    D’Angelo, R

    E. D’Angelo, R. Ferrero and M. Fröb,Hadamard propagators for massive gravitons and ghosts in de Sitter space, in preparation

  2. [1]

    Bunch and P.C.W

    T.S. Bunch and P.C.W. Davies,Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A360 (1978) 117

    1978

  3. [2]

    J. Bros, U. Moschella and J.P. Gazeau,Quantum field theory in the de Sitter universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.73 (1994) 1746

    1994

  4. [3]

    Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    E. Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001 [hep-th/0106109]

    arXiv 2001

  5. [4]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    J.116 (1998) 1009 [astro-ph/9805201]

    Supernova Search Team collaboration, Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116 (1998) 1009 [astro-ph/9805201]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [6]

    J.517 (1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133]

    Supernova Cosmology Project collaboration, Measurements ofΩ and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J.517 (1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133]

    arXiv 1999

  8. [7]

    ’t Hooft and M.J.G

    G. ’t Hooft and M.J.G. Veltman,One loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare A Phys. Theor.20 (1974) 69

    1974

Show all 128 references
  1. [8]

    Goroff and A

    M.H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti,Quantum gravity at two loops, Phys. Lett. B160 (1985) 81

    1985

  2. [9]

    Goroff and A

    M.H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti,The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 266 (1986) 709. – 36 –

    1986

  3. [10]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,Renormalization group flow of quantum gravity in the Einstein-Hilbert truncation, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 065016 [hep-th/0110054]

    2002 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,From big bang to asymptotic de Sitter: Complete cosmologies in a quantum gravity framework, JCAP 09 (2005) 012 [hep-th/0507167]

    2005 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, vol

    R. Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, vol. 3 of 100 Years of General Relativity, World Scientific (2017), 10.1142/10369

    2017 doi

  6. [13]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymptotic Safety, Cambridge University Press (1, 2019)

    2019

  7. [14]

    Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys

    M. Reuter,Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 971 [hep-th/9605030]

    1998 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Weinberg,Critical Phenomena for Field Theorists, in14th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Understanding the Fundamental Constitutents of Matter, 8, 1976, DOI

    S. Weinberg,Critical Phenomena for Field Theorists, in14th International School of Subnuclear Physics: Understanding the Fundamental Constitutents of Matter, 8, 1976, DOI

    1976

  9. [16]

    Weinberg,Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp

    S. Weinberg,Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp. 790–831 (1980)

    1980

  10. [17]

    Donoghue,A Critique of the Asymptotic Safety Program, Front

    J.F. Donoghue,A Critique of the Asymptotic Safety Program, Front. in Phys.8 (2020) 56 [1911.02967]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Bonanno, A

    A. Bonanno, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J.M. Pawlowski, R. Percacci, M. Reuter et al.,Critical reflections on asymptotically safe gravity, Front. in Phys.8 (2020) 269 [2004.06810]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians, Nucl

    J. Polchinski,Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians, Nucl. Phys. B231 (1984) 269

    1984

  13. [20]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter,Proper time flow equation for gravity, JHEP 02 (2005) 035 [hep-th/0410191]

    2005 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich,Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301 (1993) 90 [1710.05815]

    1993 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Morris,The Exact renormalization group and approximate solutions, Int

    T.R. Morris,The Exact renormalization group and approximate solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9 (1994) 2411 [hep-ph/9308265]

    1994 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Ferrero and M

    R. Ferrero and M. Reuter,The spectral geometry of de Sitter space in asymptotic safety, JHEP 08 (2022) 040 [2203.08003]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [24]

    D’Angelo, N

    E. D’Angelo, N. Drago, N. Pinamonti and K. Rejzner,An Algebraic QFT Approach to the Wetterich Equation on Lorentzian Manifolds, Annales Henri Poincare25 (2024) 2295 [2202.07580]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    D’Angelo and K

    E. D’Angelo and K. Rejzner,A lorentzian renormalization group equation for gauge theories, Annales Henri Poincaré(2025) [ 2303.01479]

    2025 arXiv

  19. [26]

    D’Angelo,Asymptotic safety in Lorentzian quantum gravity, Phys

    E. D’Angelo,Asymptotic safety in Lorentzian quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 066012 [2310.20603]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Thiemann,Asymptotically safe — canonical quantum gravity junction, JHEP 10 (2024) 013 [2404.18220]

    T. Thiemann,Asymptotically safe — canonical quantum gravity junction, JHEP 10 (2024) 013 [2404.18220]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Ferrero and T

    R. Ferrero and T. Thiemann,Relational Lorentzian Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity: Showcase model, Universe 10 (2024) 410 [2404.18224]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Banerjee and M

    R. Banerjee and M. Niedermaier,Wick rotation in the lapse: admissible complex metrics and the associated heat kernel, 6, 2024. – 37 –

    2024

  23. [30]

    Kaya,Exact renormalization group flow in an expanding Universe and screening of the cosmological constant, Phys

    A. Kaya,Exact renormalization group flow in an expanding Universe and screening of the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 123501 [1303.5459]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Serreau,Renormalization group flow and symmetry restoration in de Sitter space, Phys

    J. Serreau,Renormalization group flow and symmetry restoration in de Sitter space, Phys. Lett. B730 (2014) 271 [1306.3846]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Guilleux and J

    M. Guilleux and J. Serreau,Quantum scalar fields in de Sitter space from the nonperturbative renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 084010 [1506.06183]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Banerjee and M

    R. Banerjee and M. Niedermaier,The spatial Functional Renormalization Group and Hadamard states on cosmological spacetimes, Nucl. Phys. B980 (2022) 115814 [2201.02575]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Pawlowski and M

    J.M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Quantum Gravity from dynamical metric fluctuations, 2309.10785

    arXiv

  28. [35]

    Baldazzi, R

    A. Baldazzi, R. Percacci and V. Skrinjar,Wicked metrics, Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019) 105008 [1811.03369]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Manrique, S

    E. Manrique, S. Rechenberger and F. Saueressig,Asymptotically Safe Lorentzian Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 251302 [1102.5012]

    2011 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Saueressig and J

    F. Saueressig and J. Wang,Foliated asymptotically safe gravity in the fluctuation approach, JHEP 09 (2023) 064 [2306.10408]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Saueressig and J

    F. Saueressig and J. Wang,Foliated Asymptotically Safe Gravity – Lorentzian Signature Fluctuations from the Wick Rotation, 2501.03752

    arXiv

  32. [39]

    Alexandre and J

    J. Alexandre and J. Polonyi,Functional Callan-Symanzik equation, Annals Phys.288 (2001) 37 [hep-th/0010128]

    2001 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Fehre, D.F

    J. Fehre, D.F. Litim, J.M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert,Lorentzian Quantum Gravity and the Graviton Spectral Function, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 081501 [2111.13232]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Epstein and V

    H. Epstein and V. Glaser,The role of locality in perturbation theory, Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique théorique19 (1973) 211

    1973

  35. [42]

    Gomis and S

    J. Gomis and S. Weinberg,Are nonrenormalizable gauge theories renormalizable?, Nucl. Phys. B469 (1996) 473 [hep-th/9510087]

    1996 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Burgess,Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev

    C.P. Burgess,Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel.7 (2004) 5 [gr-qc/0311082]

    2004 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Hollands and R.M

    S. Hollands and R.M. Wald,Local Wick polynomials and time ordered products of quantum fields in curved space-time, Commun. Math. Phys.223 (2001) 289 [gr-qc/0103074]

    2001 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Hollands and R.M

    S. Hollands and R.M. Wald,Existence of local covariant time ordered products of quantum fields in curved space-time, Commun. Math. Phys.231 (2002) 309 [gr-qc/0111108]

    2002 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Buccio, J.F

    D. Buccio, J.F. Donoghue and R. Percacci,Amplitudes and renormalization group techniques: A case study, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 045008 [2307.00055]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Buccio, J.F

    D. Buccio, J.F. Donoghue, G. Menezes and R. Percacci,Physical Running of Couplings in Quadratic Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 021604 [2403.02397]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Schomblond and P

    C. Schomblond and P. Spindel,Conditions d’unicité pour le propagateur∆(1)(x,y ) du champ scalaire dans l’univers de de Sitter, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Phys. Theor.25 (1976) 67. – 38 –

    1976

  42. [49]

    Bros and U

    J. Bros and U. Moschella,Two point functions and quantum fields in de Sitter universe, Rev. Math. Phys.8 (1996) 327 [gr-qc/9511019]

    1996 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Allen,Vacuum States in de Sitter Space, Phys

    B. Allen,Vacuum States in de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 3136

    1985

  44. [51]

    Allen and T

    B. Allen and T. Jacobson,Vector Two Point Functions in Maximally Symmetric Spaces, Commun. Math. Phys.103 (1986) 669

    1986

  45. [52]

    Fröb and A

    M.B. Fröb and A. Higuchi,Mode-sum construction of the two-point functions for the Stueckelberg vector fields in the Poincaré patch of de Sitter space, J. Math. Phys.55 (2014) 062301 [1305.3421]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Glavan and T

    D. Glavan and T. Prokopec,Even the photon propagator must break de Sitter symmetry, Phys. Lett. B841 (2023) 137928 [2212.13997]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Farnsworth, K

    K. Farnsworth, K. Hinterbichler and O. Hulik,Scale and conformal invariance on (A)dS spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 045011 [2402.12430]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Brunetti, C

    R. Brunetti, C. Dappiaggi, K. Fredenhagen and J. Yngvason, eds.,Advances in algebraic quantum field theory, Mathematical Physics Studies, Springer (2015), 10.1007/978-3-319-21353-8

    2015 doi

  49. [56]

    Brunetti, M

    R. Brunetti, M. Duetsch and K. Fredenhagen,Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory and the Renormalization Groups, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13 (2009) 1541 [0901.2038]

    2009 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Brunetti and K

    R. Brunetti and K. Fredenhagen,Microlocal analysis and interacting quantum field theories: Renormalization on physical backgrounds, Commun. Math. Phys.208 (2000) 623 [math-ph/9903028]

    2000 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Brunetti, K

    R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen and R. Verch,The Generally covariant locality principle: A New paradigm for local quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys.237 (2003) 31 [math-ph/0112041]

    2003 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Rejzner,Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: An Introduction for Mathematicians, Mathematical Physics Studies, Springer, New York (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-25901-7

    K. Rejzner,Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: An Introduction for Mathematicians, Mathematical Physics Studies, Springer, New York (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-25901-7

    2016 doi

  53. [60]

    DeWitt and R.W

    B.S. DeWitt and R.W. Brehme,Radiation damping in a gravitational field, Annals Phys.9 (1960) 220

    1960

  54. [61]

    Decanini and A

    Y. Decanini and A. Folacci,Off-diagonal coefficients of the Dewitt-Schwinger and Hadamard representations of the Feynman propagator, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 044027 [gr-qc/0511115]

    2006 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Hack and V

    T.-P. Hack and V. Moretti,On the stress–energy tensor of quantum fields in curved spacetimes — comparison of different regularization schemes and symmetry of the Hadamard/Seeley–DeWitt coefficients, J. Phys. A45 (2012) 374019 [1202.5107]

    2012 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Hollands and R.M

    S. Hollands and R.M. Wald,Quantum fields in curved spacetime, Phys. Rept.574 (2015) 1 [1401.2026]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Braun et al.,Renormalised spectral flows, SciPost Phys

    J. Braun et al.,Renormalised spectral flows, SciPost Phys. Core6 (2023) 061 [2206.10232]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Codello, R

    A. Codello, R. Percacci and C. Rahmede,Ultraviolet properties of f(R)-gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A23 (2008) 143 [0705.1769]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Codello, R

    A. Codello, R. Percacci and C. Rahmede,Investigating the Ultraviolet Properties of Gravity with a Wilsonian Renormalization Group Equation, Annals Phys.324 (2009) 414 [0805.2909]. – 39 –

    2009 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Falls, D.F

    K. Falls, D.F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede,Further evidence for asymptotic safety of quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 104022 [1410.4815]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Falls, C.R

    K. Falls, C.R. King, D.F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos and C. Rahmede,Asymptotic safety of quantum gravity beyond Ricci scalars, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 086006 [1801.00162]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [69]

    M.B. Fröb, A. Higuchi and W.C.C. Lima,Mode-sum construction of the covariant graviton two-point function in the Poincaré patch of de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 124006 [1603.07338]

    2016 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Fewster and R

    C.J. Fewster and R. Verch,The Necessity of the Hadamard Condition, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 235027 [1307.5242]

    2013 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Chernikov and E.A

    N.A. Chernikov and E.A. Tagirov,Quantum theory of scalar fields in de Sitter space-time, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare A Phys. Theor.9 (1968) 109

    1968

  65. [72]

    Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time, Nucl

    A. Higuchi,Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De Sitter Space-time, Nucl. Phys. B282 (1987) 397

    1987

  66. [73]

    Gérard and M

    C. Gérard and M. Wrochna,IR-fixed Euclidean vacuum for linearized gravity on de Sitter space, 2405.00866

  67. [75]

    Local Wick Rotation

    V. Moretti,Proof of the Symmetry of the Off-Diagonal Hadamard/Seeley–deWitt’s Coefficients inC ∞ Lorentzian Manifolds by a “Local Wick Rotation”, Commun. Math. Phys. 212 (2000) 165 [gr-qc/9908068]

    2000 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Kamiński,Elementary proof of symmetry of the off-diagonal Seeley–DeWitt (and related Hadamard) coefficients, 1904.03708

    W. Kamiński,Elementary proof of symmetry of the off-diagonal Seeley–DeWitt (and related Hadamard) coefficients, 1904.03708

    1904 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Radzikowski,Micro-local approach to the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time, Commun

    M.J. Radzikowski,Micro-local approach to the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory on curved space-time, Commun. Math. Phys.179 (1996) 529

    1996

  70. [78]

    Moretti,On the global Hadamard parametrix in QFT and the signed squared geodesic distance defined in domains larger than convex normal neighbourhoods, Lett

    V. Moretti,On the global Hadamard parametrix in QFT and the signed squared geodesic distance defined in domains larger than convex normal neighbourhoods, Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021) 130 [2107.04903]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Pérez-Nadal, A

    G. Pérez-Nadal, A. Roura and E. Verdaguer,Stress tensor fluctuations in de Sitter spacetime, JCAP 05 (2010) 036 [0911.4870]

    2010 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Ford and L

    L.H. Ford and L. Parker,Infrared Divergences in a Class of Robertson-Walker Universes, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 245

    1977

  73. [81]

    Poisson, A

    E. Poisson, A. Pound and I. Vega,The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Rev. Rel.14 (2011) 7 [1102.0529]

    2011 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Olver, A.B

    F.W.J. Olver, A.B. Olde Daalhuis, D.W. Lozier, B.I. Schneider, R.F. Boisvert, C.W. Clark et al.,NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Release 1.2.3 of 2024-12-15, (2024), https://dlmf.nist.gov/

    2024

  75. [83]

    Allen, A

    B. Allen, A. Folacci and A.C. Ottewill,The Renormalized Graviton Stress - Energy Tensor in Curved Vacuum Space-times, Phys. Rev. D38 (1988) 1069

    1988

  76. [84]

    Glavan and T

    D. Glavan and T. Prokopec,Photon propagator in de Sitter space in the general covariant gauge, JHEP 05 (2023) 126 [2212.13982]. – 40 –

    2023 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Faizal and A

    M. Faizal and A. Higuchi,On the FP-ghost propagators for Yang-Mills theories and perturbative quantum gravity in the covariant gauge in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 067502 [0806.3735]

    2008 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Gibbons and A

    J. Gibbons and A. Higuchi,Removing the Faddeev-Popov zero modes from Yang-Mills theory in spacetimes with compact spatial sections, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 024006 [1410.7830]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Benedetti,Asymptotic safety goes on shell, New J

    D. Benedetti,Asymptotic safety goes on shell, New J. Phys.14 (2012) 015005 [1107.3110]

    2012 arXiv

  80. [88]

    H. Gies, B. Knorr and S. Lippoldt,Generalized Parametrization Dependence in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 084020 [1507.08859]

    2015 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Falls,Physical renormalization schemes and asymptotic safety in quantum gravity, Phys

    K. Falls,Physical renormalization schemes and asymptotic safety in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 126016 [1702.03577]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Martini, D

    R. Martini, D. Sauro and O. Zanusso,Composite higher derivative operators in d=2+ε dimensions and the spectrum of asymptotically safe gravity, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 065014 [2302.14804]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Falls and R

    K. Falls and R. Ferrero,Asymptotic Safety within on-shell perturbation theory, 2411.00938

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Falls and M

    K. Falls and M. Herrero-Valea,Frame (In)equivalence in Quantum Field Theory and Cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 595 [1812.08187]

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Baldazzi, R.B.A

    A. Baldazzi, R.B.A. Zinati and K. Falls,Essential renormalisation group, SciPost Phys.13 (2022) 085 [2105.11482]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Baldazzi and K

    A. Baldazzi and K. Falls,Essential Quantum Einstein Gravity, Universe 7 (2021) 294 [2107.00671]

    2021 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Higuchi,Massive Symmetric Tensor Field in Space-times With a Positive Cosmological Constant, Nucl

    A. Higuchi,Massive Symmetric Tensor Field in Space-times With a Positive Cosmological Constant, Nucl. Phys. B325 (1989) 745

    1989

  88. [96]

    Fried and D.R

    H.M. Fried and D.R. Yennie,New Techniques in the Lamb Shift Calculation, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 1391

    1958

  89. [97]

    Eides, H

    M.I. Eides, H. Grotch and V.A. Shelyuto,Theory of light hydrogen-like atoms, Phys. Rept. 342 (2001) 63 [hep-ph/0002158]

    2001 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Loll,Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review, Class

    R. Loll,Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review, Class. Quant. Grav.37 (2020) 013002 [1905.08669]

    2020 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Ambjorn, A

    J. Ambjorn, A. Gorlich, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll,Planckian Birth of the Quantum de Sitter Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 091304 [0712.2485]

    2008 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Ambjorn, A

    J. Ambjorn, A. Gorlich, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll,The Nonperturbative Quantum de Sitter Universe, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 063544 [0807.4481]

    2008 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Ambjørn, J

    J. Ambjørn, J. Gizbert-Studnicki, A. Gőrlich and D. Németh,Is lattice quantum gravity asymptotically safe? Making contact between causal dynamical triangulations and the functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 126006 [2408.07808]

    2024

  94. [102]

    Higuchi and R.H

    A. Higuchi and R.H. Weeks,The Physical graviton two point function in de Sitter space-time with S3 spatial sections, Class. Quant. Grav.20 (2003) 3005 [gr-qc/0212031]

    2003 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Higuchi, D

    A. Higuchi, D. Marolf and I.A. Morrison,On the Equivalence between Euclidean and In-In Formalisms in de Sitter QFT, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 084029 [1012.3415]. – 41 –

    2011 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Higuchi, D

    A. Higuchi, D. Marolf and I.A. Morrison,de Sitter invariance of the dS graviton vacuum, Class. Quant. Grav.28 (2011) 245012 [1107.2712]

    2011 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Miao, N.C

    S.P. Miao, N.C. Tsamis and R.P. Woodard,The Graviton Propagator in de Donder Gauge on de Sitter Background, J. Math. Phys.52 (2011) 122301 [1106.0925]

    2011 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Mora, N.C

    P.J. Mora, N.C. Tsamis and R.P. Woodard,Graviton Propagator in a General Invariant Gauge on de Sitter, J. Math. Phys.53 (2012) 122502 [1205.4468]

    2012 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Morrison,On cosmic hair and ”de Sitter breaking” in linearized quantum gravity, 1302.1860

    I.A. Morrison,On cosmic hair and ”de Sitter breaking” in linearized quantum gravity, 1302.1860

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    Ferrero and C

    R. Ferrero and C. Ripken,De Sitter scattering amplitudes in the Born approximation, SciPost Phys.13 (2022) 106 [2112.03766]

    2022 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Baldazzi, K

    A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, Y. Kluth and B. Knorr,Robustness of the derivative expansion in Asymptotic Safety, 2312.03831

    arXiv

  102. [110]

    Knorr,Safe essential scalar-tensor theories, 2204.08564

    B. Knorr,Safe essential scalar-tensor theories, 2204.08564

    arXiv

  103. [111]

    Knorr,Momentum-dependent field redefinitions in asymptotic safety, Phys

    B. Knorr,Momentum-dependent field redefinitions in asymptotic safety, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 026001 [2311.12097]

    2024 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Christiansen, B

    N. Christiansen, B. Knorr, J.M. Pawlowski and A. Rodigast,Global Flows in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 044036 [1403.1232]

    2016 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Korver, F

    G. Korver, F. Saueressig and J. Wang,Global flows of foliated gravity-matter systems, Phys. Lett. B855 (2024) 138789 [2402.01260]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Falls and N

    K. Falls and N. Ohta,Renormalization Group Equation forf(R) gravity on hyperbolic spaces, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 084005 [1607.08460]

    2016 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Dittrich,Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity, Class

    B. Dittrich,Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006) 6155 [gr-qc/0507106]

    2006 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Giesel, S

    K. Giesel, S. Hofmann, T. Thiemann and O. Winkler,Manifestly Gauge-Invariant General Relativistic Perturbation Theory. I. Foundations, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 055005 [0711.0115]

    2010 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Giesel, S

    K. Giesel, S. Hofmann, T. Thiemann and O. Winkler,Manifestly Gauge-invariant general relativistic perturbation theory. II. FRW background and first order, Class. Quant. Grav.27 (2010) 055006 [0711.0117]

    2010 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Giesel and T

    K. Giesel and T. Thiemann,Scalar Material Reference Systems and Loop Quantum Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015) 135015 [1206.3807]

    2015 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Fröb,Gauge-invariant quantum gravitational corrections to correlation functions, Class

    M.B. Fröb,Gauge-invariant quantum gravitational corrections to correlation functions, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 055006 [1710.00839]

    2018 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Fröb and W.C.C

    M.B. Fröb and W.C.C. Lima,Propagators for gauge-invariant observables in cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 095010 [1711.08470]

    2018 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Giesel, A

    K. Giesel, A. Herzog and P. Singh,Gauge invariant variables for cosmological perturbation theory using geometrical clocks, Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 155012 [1801.09630]

    2018 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Fröb and W.C.C

    M.B. Fröb and W.C.C. Lima,Cosmological perturbations and invariant observables in geodesic lightcone coordinates, JCAP 01 (2022) 034 [2108.11960]

    2022 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Giddings and J

    S.B. Giddings and J. Perkins,Perturbative quantum evolution of the gravitational state and dressing in general backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 026012 [2209.06836]. – 42 –

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Goeller, P.A

    C. Goeller, P.A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance, 2206.01193

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Baldazzi, K

    A. Baldazzi, K. Falls and R. Ferrero,Relational observables in asymptotically safe gravity, Annals Phys.440 (2022) 168822 [2112.02118]

    2022 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Fröb and W.C.C

    M.B. Fröb and W.C.C. Lima,Synchronous coordinates and gauge-invariant observables in cosmological spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.40 (2023) 215006 [2303.16218]

    2023 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Bernardeau, S

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga and R. Scoccimarro,Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory, Phys. Rept.367 (2002) 1 [astro-ph/0112551]

    2002 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Friedrich, S

    O. Friedrich, S. Seitz, T.F. Eifler and D. Gruen,Performance of internal Covariance Estimators for Cosmic Shear Correlation Functions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.456 (2016) 2662 [1508.00895]. – 43 –

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.