Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Alleviating the Hubble Tension with Smooth Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Full CMB Constraints with DESI and PantheonPlus

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Smooth sign-switching dark energy fits full CMB, DESI and Pantheon+ data while easing the Hubble tension.

desk verdict Solid first full-perturbation constraints on smooth sign-switching DE; the H0 relief and statistical preference are real but sit on a fluid-model upper bound for transition speed that the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05044 v1 pith:DQDH5TEH submitted 2026-07-06 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Mariam Bouhmadi-López , Hsu-Wen Chiang , Beñat Ibarra-Uriondo This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords sign-switchingdarkenergyECDMHubbletensioncosmologicalperturbationsCMBDESIBAOPantheon+ISWeffect
topics Dark EnergyThe Hubble Tension
open problems Dark EnergyThe Hubble Tension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tests a smooth version of sign-switching dark energy, called ECDM, in which the dark-energy density gradually rises from a negative value to a positive one. The authors rewrite the linear-perturbation equations so they stay finite even when the dark-energy equation of state diverges at the zero-crossing. They then fit the model to Planck, ACT and SPT CMB data, DESI BAO, Pantheon+ supernovae and the SH0ES Hubble-constant measurement. The joint analysis shows that ECDM remains compatible with all these probes, prefers a finite transition speed rather than an instantaneous jump, and moves the inferred Hubble constant closer to the local value, thereby reducing the long-standing tension with early-universe inferences.

What carries the argument

The rescaled density contrast f_A = δ ho_A / (ρ_A + p_A), which remains finite when the dark-energy density crosses zero and thereby allows stable numerical evolution of perturbations through the sign switch.

What would settle it

A decisive increase in the best-fit χ^{2} when the transition speed is forced to extreme values, or a statistically significant mismatch between the predicted fσ_8(z) or CMB-lensing spectrum and forthcoming redshift-space-distortion or lensing data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When linear dark-energy perturbations are treated consistently, the smooth error-function ECDM model is fully compatible with current precision CMB, BAO and supernova data and simultaneously lowers the Hubble tension relative to flat ΛCDM.

Load-bearing premise

The rest-frame sound speed of dark energy is fixed by hand to the speed of light, and the background density is assumed to follow a pure two-parameter error-function profile.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Joint CMB+BAO+SNe analyses will continue to favour a finite transition speed over an instantaneous AdS-to-dS jump.
  • The model predicts a temporary negative ISW–galaxy cross-correlation around the transition redshift that future surveys can search for.
  • Ultra-fast transitions are ruled out by the growth of structure once dark-energy perturbations are included.
  • Early-universe physics remains essentially unchanged, so the sound-horizon scale is left intact.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A microphysical scalar-field realisation would be needed to decide whether the upper bound on transition speed is generic or an artefact of the error-function ansatz.
  • The same regularisation of perturbations could be applied to other models that cross the null-energy condition or the zero-density line.
  • If the mild S_8 upshift survives, weak-lensing surveys may become the decisive arbiter between ECDM and ΛCDM.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a consistent linear-perturbation formulation for the ECDM model (error-function sign-switching dark energy density, Eq. 3.1) that remains regular when w_d diverges at the zero-crossing of ρ_d. Using a modified CAMB + Cobaya MCMC pipeline, the authors confront the model with Planck 2018 + ACT DR6 + SPT-3G CMB (including lensing), DESI DR2 BAO, Pantheon+ SNe, and SH0ES H0. They report that ECDM is compatible with the full data suite, yields a mild upward shift in H0 relative to ΛCDM (Table 2), improves most information criteria and tension metrics when SH0ES is included, and produces distinctive but observationally acceptable signatures in the matter power spectrum, ISW, and CMB lensing (Figs. 9–11).

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies the first full-CMB, perturbation-consistent test of a smooth sign-switching DE scenario, closing a technical gap left by earlier background-only or abrupt-transition (ΛsCDM) studies. The regularised variables f_A ≡ δ_A/(1+w_A) (Eqs. 4.4–4.5) and the accompanying synchronous-gauge implementation are reusable for any DE model that crosses ρ=0 or w=−1. The multi-probe power-spectrum analysis and the extensive suite of AIC/BIC/DIC/WAIC/evidence/suspiciousness diagnostics further strengthen the empirical case that late-time sign-switching remains viable. These elements constitute a clear incremental advance for the sign-switching literature and for the broader CosmoVerse programme.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.1–6.2, Table 2, Figs. 1 & 8] §6.1–6.2 and Table 2: every data combination returns only an upper bound on log10 η (or η). The text itself states that this bound is “data-independent” and “originates from the breakdown of the dark-energy fluid description” (oscillatory f_d after the transition, lower-centre panel of Fig. 1 and the fixed-η=10^{3/2} experiment of Fig. 8). When the largest prior value is forced, H0 rises toward the SH0ES value but S8 jumps to ~0.90 and χ² degrades by ~10 %. Thus the region that most effectively alleviates the Hubble tension is precisely the region excluded by the regularised fluid equations. The central claim of “full compatibility while alleviating the Hubble tension” therefore rests on a prior-truncated, model-breakdown bound that must be either (i) shown to be physical rather than an artefact of the perfect-fluid closure, or (ii) replaced by a more fundamental (e.g. scalar-field) real
  2. [§4.1] §4.1: the rest-frame sound speed is fixed by hand to c_s^{2}=1 “for simplicity,” with only a brief check that small positive values leave the spectra unchanged. Because c_s^{2} directly controls the DE clustering that sources the ISW and the late-time growth features used to disfavour rapid transitions, the statistical preference for ECDM (and the upper bound on η) could shift under a free or scale-dependent c_s^{2}. A short MCMC exploration of c_s^{2} (or at least a clear demonstration that the posterior on {η,z†,H0} is insensitive) is required for the load-bearing claims of §§6–8.
  3. [§6.1, Fig. 2, Table 2] CMB-only posteriors are bimodal (Fig. 2), with a slow-transition branch that yields H0≳80 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} but is later eliminated by SNe. The paper reports the combined-data H0≃69 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} as “alleviating” the tension, yet the quantitative reduction relative to ΛCDM is modest (~0.8 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}) once the slow branch is removed. A clearer statement of the residual tension (in σ) for the fast branch alone, both with and without SH0ES, would prevent over-statement of the model’s success.
minor comments (5)
  1. [title, abstract] Title and abstract contain typographical artefacts (“Hubble T ension”, “PantheonPlus”). Standardise to “Hubble Tension” and “Pantheon+” throughout.
  2. [§3] Eq. (3.2) and the subsequent total-w expression (3.3) would benefit from an explicit statement that the apparent pole in w_d is integrable and does not affect the background expansion; a short analytic check would help non-specialist readers.
  3. [Fig. 1] Figure 1 caption refers to “MAP values form the CMB-SPA combination”; correct the typo and define “SPA” (or replace by the explicit data combination used).
  4. [Table 1] The prior table (Table 1) lists both log10(log10(1+z†)) and the linear z†; clarify which parametrisation is actually sampled and which is derived.
  5. [Appendix C] Appendix C defines several Bayesian estimators but does not state the precise value of α used for the truncated harmonic-mean evidence; the text later adopts α=0.95—move that choice into the appendix for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: phenomenological ECDM ansatz is adopted via self-citation, but the regularised perturbation equations and all data constraints are independently derived and fitted to external observations.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [§3, Eq. (3.1) and surrounding text]
    "we adopt the ECDM model introduced in [167, 168, 182], in which the DE density is described by an error-function profile that allows for a continuous interpolation between an early-time negative density and a late-time positive de Sitter-like phase."

    The functional form ρ_d(x) ∝ erf(η(x−x†)) is not derived; it is imported by citation to the authors' own prior phenomenological papers. The present work then treats that form as the model under test. This is a mild ansatz-via-self-citation, but it is not load-bearing for the new results (perturbation reformulation or data constraints).

full rationale

The paper's central technical contribution (regularised linear DE perturbations that remain finite when w_d diverges) is obtained by a direct algebraic substitution f_A ≡ δ_A/(1+w_A) into the standard continuity and Euler equations; the resulting system (4.5) is well-defined by construction and does not presuppose any observational outcome. The background density profile itself is an explicit two-parameter ansatz (error-function interpolation) taken from the authors' earlier background-only papers; this is ordinary model-building, not a uniqueness theorem or a fitted quantity re-labelled as a prediction. All subsequent claims—compatibility with Planck+ACT+SPT+DESI+Pantheon+/SH0ES, mild H_0 relief, upper bounds on transition speed η—are ordinary MCMC posteriors against external data sets. The data-independent upper bound on η arises from the fluid description itself (oscillatory f_d after the sign switch) and is openly reported as a limitation, not hidden as a success. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own input by algebra or by an unverified self-citation chain. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation of the ansatz.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological two-parameter extension of ΛCDM plus the perfect-fluid approximation with fixed sound speed. Standard cosmological parameters and data sets are taken from the literature; the only new free parameters and the regularised fluid variables are introduced by the paper itself.

free parameters (3)
  • log10 η (transition rapidity) = 0.67^{+0.56}_{-0.50} (CMB+PPS+DESI)
    Controls the width of the error-function density flip; fitted freely (flat prior) and drives the preferred intermediate-speed branch.
  • log10(log10(1+z†)) (transition redshift) = –0.229^{+0.022}_{-0.040} (CMB+PPS+DESI)
    Sets the epoch of the sign change; free parameter that shifts H0 and growth history.
  • standard ΛCDM six-parameter set {Ω_b h², Ω_c h², H0, ln(10^{10} A_s), n_s, τ_reio}
    Baseline early-Universe parameters retained and re-fitted jointly with the ECDM extensions.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Dark energy is a perfect fluid with rest-frame sound speed fixed to c_s^{2} = 1
    Stated in §4.1; the authors note that small positive values leave spectra unchanged, but the choice is not varied in the MCMC.
  • ad hoc to paper Background DE density follows the error-function profile of Eq. (3.1)
    Defines the ECDM model; recovers ΛsCDM only in the η → ∞ limit.
  • domain assumption Early-Universe physics (BBN, recombination, sound horizon) remains identical to ΛCDM
    Implicit throughout; the model is constructed so that only late-time expansion is modified.
  • domain assumption Linear scalar perturbations in Newtonian/synchronous gauge suffice for CMB and large-scale structure
    Standard cosmological assumption used to derive Eqs. (4.5) and (B.5).
invented entities (2)
  • Rescaled density contrast f_A ≡ δ_A / (1 + w_A)
    purpose: Removes the pole in the perturbation equations when ρ_d crosses zero, allowing stable numerical evolution through the transition.
    Introduced in §4.1; purely a mathematical redefinition of an existing fluid variable, not a new physical degree of freedom.
  • ECDM error-function dark-energy density
    purpose: Provides a controllable smooth interpolation between negative and positive DE density.
    Phenomenological ansatz taken from earlier papers by the same authors; no microphysical derivation is supplied.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Alleviating the Hubble Tension with Smooth Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Full CMB Constraints with DESI and PantheonPlus." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DQDH5TEH

@misc{pith2026260705044,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Alleviating the Hubble Tension with Smooth Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Full CMB Constraints with DESI and PantheonPlus},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DQDH5TEH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05044}
}
read the original abstract

Sign-switching dark energy has recently been proposed as a minimal modification of the late-time expansion history aimed at alleviating tensions within the standard cosmological model. In this work, we investigate ECDM, a smooth realisation of this scenario, with the dark energy density gradually transitioning from a negative to a positive value. We develop a consistent formulation of the perturbation equations that remains well behaved even when the dark energy equation-of-state parameter diverges during the transition. We confront the model with a comprehensive set of cosmological observations, including cosmic microwave background measurements from Planck 2018, ACT DR6 and SPT-3G, baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from DESI DR2, Type Ia supernova distances from Pantheon+, and local Hubble constant measurement of SH0ES. The inclusion of perturbations allows us to assess the impact of the model on structure growth and CMB anisotropies, providing a more thorough test of sign-switching dark energy. Our results show that this class of models is fully compatible with current precision cosmological observations while alleviating the Hubble tension and providing a compelling modification of the late-time dynamics of the Universe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Defocusing dark energy: Raychaudhuri diagnostics beyond $w<-1/3$ and the phantom divide

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For sign-changing effective dark energy, smooth negative-to-positive density crossings make ρ+3p and ρ+p the correct diagnostics, give w=p/ρ a universal pole n(1+z†)/3, and force repulsion onset z_rep>z† while ρ<0.

  2. $\Lambda$XCDM: a running vacuum strategy for crossing the phantom divide

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    When fitted to CMB, DESI BAO and supernova data, the ΛXCDM running-vacuum-plus-cosmon model produces an effective dark-energy equation of state that crosses the phantom divide at z≈0.4–0.8 and keeps the coincidence ra...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

197 extracted references · 148 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Eisenstein et al.,Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of sdss luminous red galaxies,The Astrophysical Journal633(2005) 560

    D.J. Eisenstein et al.,Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of sdss luminous red galaxies,The Astrophysical Journal633(2005) 560

    2005

  2. [2]

    S. Cole et al.,The 2df galaxy redshift survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society362(2005) 505

    2005

  3. [3]

    Percival et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the sloan digital sky survey data release 7 galaxy sample,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society401(2010) 2148

    W.J. Percival et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the sloan digital sky survey data release 7 galaxy sample,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society401(2010) 2148

    2010

  4. [4]

    Tegmark et al.,The three-dimensional power spectrum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey,The Astrophysical Journal606(2004) 702

    M. Tegmark et al.,The three-dimensional power spectrum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey,The Astrophysical Journal606(2004) 702

    2004

  5. [5]

    Reid et al.,Cosmological constraints from the clustering of the sloan digital sky survey dr7 luminous red galaxies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society404(2010) 60

    B.A. Reid et al.,Cosmological constraints from the clustering of the sloan digital sky survey dr7 luminous red galaxies,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society404(2010) 60. [12]eBOSScollaboration,Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache P...

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys

    D. Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938(2022) 113 [2112.03863]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys

    D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110 [2202.04077]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys

    D. Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys. J.986(2025) 231 [2311.12098]. – 34 – [16]DESIcollaboration, D.J. Schlegel et al.,A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5, 9, 2022. 10.2172/1887254. [17]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024: reconstructing dark energy using crossi...

    arXiv doi:10.2172/1887254 2025

Show all 197 references
  1. [9]

    Elbers et al.,Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys

    W. Elbers et al.,Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083513 [2503.14744]. [24]DESIcollaboration,Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083511 [2503.14743]. [25]DESIcollaborati...

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Sabogal, R.C

    M.A. Sabogal, R.C. Nunes, F. Avila and A. Bernui,Updated cosmological constraints from 2D BAO measurements: a new compilation and comparison with DESI DR2,Eur. Phys. J. C86 (2026) 314 [2510.16141]

    2026

  3. [11]

    Jimenez and A

    R. Jimenez and A. Loeb,Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages, Astrophys. J.573(2002) 37 [astro-ph/0106145]

    2002 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Moresco,Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers, 12, 2024

    M. Moresco,Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers, 12, 2024. [29]H0DNcollaboration,The Local Distance Network: A community consensus report on the measurement of the Hubble constant at∼1% precision,Astron. Astrophys.708(2026) A166 [2510.23823]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Freedman, B.F

    W.L. Freedman, B.F. Madore, T.J. Hoyt, I.S. Jang, A.J. Lee and K.A. Owens,Status Report on the Chicago-Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP): Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes,Astrophys. J.985(2025) 203 [2408.06153]

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The cosmological constant problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1

    1989

  7. [15]

    Sahni and A.A

    V. Sahni and A.A. Starobinsky,The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D09(2000) 373 [astro-ph/9904398]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Sahni,The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence,Class

    V. Sahni,The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence,Class. Quant. Grav.19 (2002) 3435 [astro-ph/0202076]. [34]CosmoVerse Networkcollaboration,The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics,Phys. Dark ...

    2002 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ratra and P.J.E

    B. Ratra and P.J.E. Peebles,Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field, Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3406. – 35 –

    1988

  10. [18]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov and P.J. Steinhardt,Essentials of k-essence,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 103510

    2001

  11. [19]

    Kamionkowski, J

    M. Kamionkowski, J. Pradler and D.G.E. Walker,Dark energy from the string axiverse,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 251302 [1409.0549]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Emami, D

    R. Emami, D. Grin, J. Pradler, A. Raccanelli and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological tests of an axiverse-inspired quintessence field,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 123005 [1603.04851]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Chiang, C.G

    H.-W. Chiang, C.G. Boiza and M. Bouhmadi-López,Observational constraints on generalised axion-like potentials for the late Universe,JCAP08(2025) 064 [2503.04898]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Kamenshchik, U

    A.Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier,An Alternative to quintessence,Phys. Lett. B511(2001) 265 [gr-qc/0103004]

    2001 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Koivisto and N.J

    T.S. Koivisto and N.J. Nunes,Inflation and dark energy from three-forms,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 103509 [0908.0920]

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Koivisto and N.J

    T.S. Koivisto and N.J. Nunes,Three-form cosmology,Phys. Lett. B685(2010) 105 [0907.3883]

    2010 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Morais, M

    J. Morais, M. Bouhmadi-López, K. Sravan Kumar, J. Marto and Y. Tavakoli,Interacting 3-form dark energy models: distinguishing interactions and avoiding the Little Sibling of the Big Rip,Phys. Dark Univ.15(2017) 7 [1608.01679]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Bouhmadi-López, J

    M. Bouhmadi-López, J. Marto, J. Morais and C.M. Silva,Cosmic infinity: A dynamical system approach,JCAP03(2017) 042 [1611.03100]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bouhmadi-López, H.-W

    M. Bouhmadi-López, H.-W. Chiang, C.G. Boiza and P. Chen,Observational constraints on 3-forms dark energy,JCAP06(2026) 084 [2512.09991]

    2026 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bouhmadi-López, H.-W

    M. Bouhmadi-López, H.-W. Chiang, C.G. Boiza, J.O. del Río, T.J. Broadhurst and P. Chen, Three-form dark energy: constraints and multi-probe comparison withΛCDM, 6, 2026

    2026

  21. [29]

    Heisenberg,Generalization of the Proca Action,JCAP05(2014) 015 [1402.7026]

    L. Heisenberg,Generalization of the Proca Action,JCAP05(2014) 015 [1402.7026]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    de Rham and V

    C. de Rham and V. Pozsgay,New class of Proca interactions,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083508 [2003.13773]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    De Felice, C.-Q

    A. De Felice, C.-Q. Geng, M.C. Pookkillath and L. Yin,Reducing theH0 tension with generalized Proca theory,JCAP08(2020) 038 [2002.06782]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Chiang, C

    H.-W. Chiang, C. de Rham, S. Garcia-Saenz and X. Zhou,Cosmological tensions in Proca-Nuevo theory,JCAP06(2026) 076 [2511.21071]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Li, G.-H

    T.-N. Li, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, P.-J. Wu, S.-J. Jin, J.-F. Zhang et al.,Probing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with DESI baryon acoustic oscillations and DES supernovae data,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69(2026) 210413 [2501.07361]

    2026

  26. [34]

    T.-N. Li, W. Giarè, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, E. Di Valentino, J.-F. Zhang et al.,Strong Evidence for Dark Sector Interactions, 1, 2026

    2026

  27. [35]

    Isham, A

    C.J. Isham, A. Salam and J. Strathdee,f-dominance of gravity,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 867

    1971

  28. [36]

    De Felice, F

    A. De Felice, F. Larrouturou, S. Mukohyama and M. Oliosi,Minimal Theory of Bigravity: construction and cosmology,JCAP04(2021) 015 [2012.01073]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Deffayet, O

    C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman,Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding,JCAP10(2010) 026 [1008.0048]

    2010 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Pujolas, I

    O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman,The Imperfect Fluid behind Kinetic Gravity Braiding, JHEP11(2011) 156 [1103.5360]. – 36 –

    2011 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Borislavov Vasilev, M

    T. Borislavov Vasilev, M. Bouhmadi-López and P. Martín-Moruno,Phantom attractors in kinetic gravity braiding theories: a dynamical system approach,JCAP06(2023) 026 [2212.02547]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Borislavov Vasilev, M

    T. Borislavov Vasilev, M. Bouhmadi-López and P. Martín-Moruno,Dark energy with a shift-symmetric scalar field: Obstacles, loophole hunting and dead ends,Phys. Dark Univ.46 (2024) 101679 [2406.12576]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Sotiriou and V

    T.P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni,f(R) Theories Of Gravity,Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 451 [0805.1726]

    2010 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis,Extended Theories of Gravity,Phys. Rept.509(2011) 167 [1108.6266]

    2011 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov,Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models,Phys. Rept.505(2011) 59 [1011.0544]

    2011 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bouhmadi-López, S

    M. Bouhmadi-López, S. Capozziello and V.F. Cardone,Cosmography of f(R) - brane cosmology,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 103526 [1010.1547]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Nojiri, S.D

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou,Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution,Phys. Rept.692(2017) 1 [1705.11098]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Morais, M

    J. Morais, M. Bouhmadi-López and S. Capozziello,Canf(R)gravity contribute to (dark) radiation?,JCAP09(2015) 041 [1507.02623]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bengochea and R

    G.R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro,Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 124019 [0812.1205]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ferraro and F

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini,Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without inflaton,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 084031 [gr-qc/0610067]

    2007 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Y.-F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and E.N. Saridakis,f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology,Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 106901 [1511.07586]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Bouhmadi-López, C.G

    M. Bouhmadi-López, C.G. Boiza, M. Petronikolou and E.N. Saridakis,Modified Teleparallel f(T) Gravity, DESI BAO and the H0 Tension,Universe12(2026) 81 [2601.22225]

    2026

  43. [51]

    Beltrán Jiménez, L

    J. Beltrán Jiménez, L. Heisenberg and T.S. Koivisto,Teleparallel Palatini theories,JCAP08 (2018) 039 [1803.10185]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Beltrán Jiménez, L

    J. Beltrán Jiménez, L. Heisenberg, T.S. Koivisto and S. Pekar,Cosmology inf(Q)geometry, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103507 [1906.10027]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Hashim, W

    M. Hashim, W. El Hanafy, A. Golovnev and A.A. El-Zant,Toward a concordance teleparallel cosmology. Part I. Background dynamics,JCAP07(2021) 052 [2010.14964]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Hashim, A.A

    M. Hashim, A.A. El-Zant, W. El Hanafy and A. Golovnev,Toward a concordance teleparallel cosmology. Part II. Linear perturbation,JCAP07(2021) 053 [2104.08311]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Ayuso, R

    I. Ayuso, R. Lazkoz and V. Salzano,Observational constraints on cosmological solutions of f(Q)theories,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 063505 [2012.00046]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Boiza, M

    C.G. Boiza, M. Petronikolou, M. Bouhmadi-López and E.N. Saridakis,Addressing H0 and S 8 tensions within f(Q) cosmology,JCAP12(2025) 011 [2505.18264]

    2025

  49. [57]

    Ayuso, M

    I. Ayuso, M. Bouhmadi-López, C.-Y. Chen, X.Y. Chew, K. Dialektopoulos and Y.C. Ong, Insights in f(Q) cosmology: the relevance of the connection,JCAP11(2025) 068 [2506.03506]

    2025

  50. [58]

    Capozziello, V

    S. Capozziello, V. De Falco and C. Ferrara,The role of the boundary term in f(Q, B) symmetric teleparallel gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 915 [2307.13280]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    De, T.-H

    A. De, T.-H. Loo and E.N. Saridakis,Non-metricity with boundary terms:f(Q,C) gravity and cosmology,JCAP03(2024) 050 [2308.00652]. – 37 –

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Bahamonde, C.G

    S. Bahamonde, C.G. Böhmer and M. Wright,Modified teleparallel theories of gravity,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 104042 [1508.05120]

    2015 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bahamonde, K.F

    S. Bahamonde, K.F. Dialektopoulos and J. Levi Said,Can Horndeski Theory be recast using Teleparallel Gravity?,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 064018 [1904.10791]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Lamaaoune,Exploring the universe expansion history with f(R,T) gravity: Constraints on cosmological parameters,Phys

    M. Lamaaoune,Exploring the universe expansion history with f(R,T) gravity: Constraints on cosmological parameters,Phys. Lett. B873(2026) 140134

    2026

  55. [63]

    Akarsu, S

    O. Akarsu, S. Kumar, E. Özülker and J.A. Vazquez,Relaxing cosmological tensions with a sign switching cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123512 [2108.09239]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Akarsu, S

    O. Akarsu, S. Kumar, E. Özülker, J.A. Vazquez and A. Yadav,Relaxing cosmological tensions with a sign switching cosmological constant: Improved results with Planck, BAO, and Pantheon data,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 023513 [2211.05742]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Akarsu, E

    O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes, J.A. Vazquez and A. Yadav,ΛsCDM model: A promising scenario for alleviation of cosmological tensions, 7, 2023

    2023

  58. [66]

    Paraskevas, A

    E.A. Paraskevas, A. Cam, L. Perivolaropoulos and O. Akarsu,Transition dynamics in the ΛsCDM model: Implications for bound cosmic structures,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 103522 [2402.05908]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Yadav, S

    A. Yadav, S. Kumar, C. Kibris and O. Akarsu,ΛsCDM cosmology: alleviating major cosmological tensions by predicting standard neutrino properties,JCAP01(2025) 042 [2406.18496]

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Akarsu, A

    Ö. Akarsu, A. De Felice, E. Di Valentino, S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes, E. Özülker et al.,ΛsCDM cosmology from a type-II minimally modified gravity,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.546(2026) staf2276 [2402.07716]

    2026 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Akarsu, A

    O. Akarsu, A. De Felice, E. Di Valentino, S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes, E. Özülker et al., Cosmological constraints onΛsCDM scenario in a type II minimally modified gravity,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 103527 [2406.07526]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Akarsu, B

    O. Akarsu, B. Bulduk, A. De Felice, N. Katırcı and N.M. Uzun,Unexplored regions in teleparallel f(T) gravity: Sign-changing dark energy density,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083532 [2410.23068]

    2025

  63. [71]

    Souza, A.M

    M.S. Souza, A.M. Barcelos, R.C. Nunes, O. Akarsu and S. Kumar,Mapping theΛsCDM Scenario to f(T) Modified Gravity: Effects on Structure Growth Rate,Universe11(2025) 2 [2501.18031]

    2025 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Akarsu, L

    O. Akarsu, L. Perivolaropoulos, A. Tsikoundoura, A.E. Yükselci and A. Zhuk,Dynamical dark energy with AdS-to-dS and dS-to-dS transitions: Implications for theH0 tension, 2, 2025

    2025

  65. [73]

    Akarsu, M

    O. Akarsu, M. Eingorn, L. Perivolaropoulos, A.E. Yükselci and A. Zhuk,Dynamical dark energy with AdS-dS transitions vs. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations atz=2.3-2.4, 4, 2025

    2025

  66. [74]

    Akarsu, A

    Ö. Akarsu, A. Çam, E.A. Paraskevas and L. Perivolaropoulos,Linear matter density perturbations in theΛsCDM model: Examining growth dynamics and addressing the S8 tension,JCAP08(2025) 089 [2502.20384]

    2025 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Escamilla, O

    L.A. Escamilla, O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, E. Özülker and J.A. Vazquez,Exploring the Growth-Index (γ) Tension withΛsCDM, 3, 2025

    2025

  68. [76]

    Akarsu, E

    Ö. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, J. Vyskočil, E. Yılmaz, A.E. Yükselci and A. Zhuk,Nonlinear matter power spectrum from relativistic N-body simulations:ΛsCDM versusΛCDM,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 083508 [2510.18741]

    2026 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,Anti-de Sitter→de Sitter transition driven by Casimir forces and mitigating tensions in cosmological parameters,Phys. Lett. B855(2024) 138775 [2312.12352]. – 38 –

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. Lust, N.T. Noble and J.F. Soriano,From infinite to infinitesimal: Using the universe as a dataset to probe Casimir corrections to the vacuum energy from fields inhabiting the dark dimension,Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024) 101715 [2404.17334]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Anchordoqui, I

    L.A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. Bielli, A. Chatrabhuti and H. Isono,Thin-wall vacuum decay in the presence of a compact dimension meets the H0 and S8 tensions,JHEP07(2025) 021 [2410.18649]

    2025

  72. [80]

    Soriano, S

    J.F. Soriano, S. Wohlberg and L.A. Anchordoqui,New insights on a sign-switchingΛ,Phys. Dark Univ.48(2025) 101911 [2502.19239]

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Akarsu, J.D

    O. Akarsu, J.D. Barrow, L.A. Escamilla and J.A. Vazquez,Graduated dark energy: Observational hints of a spontaneous sign switch in the cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 063528 [1912.08751]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Mukherjee and A.A. Sen,Dark Energy with Phantom Crossing and the H0 Tension,Entropy23(2021) 404 [2005.12587]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    S.A. Adil, Ö. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, R.C. Nunes, E. Özülker, A.A. Sen et al.,Omnipotent dark energy: A phenomenological answer to the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023527 [2306.08046]

    2024 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Specogna, S.A

    E. Specogna, S.A. Adil, E. Ozulker, E. Di Valentino, R.C. Nunes, O. Akarsu et al.,Updated constraints on omnipotent dark energy: A comprehensive analysis with CMB and BAO data, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 103549 [2504.17859]

    2026 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Alberto Vazquez, M

    J. Alberto Vazquez, M. Bridges, M.P. Hobson and A.N. Lasenby,Reconstruction of the Dark Energy equation of state,JCAP09(2012) 020 [1205.0847]

    2012 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Sahni and Y

    V. Sahni and Y. Shtanov,Brane world models of dark energy,JCAP11(2003) 014 [astro-ph/0202346]

    2003 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Vazquez, S

    J.A. Vazquez, S. Hee, M.P. Hobson, A.N. Lasenby, M. Ibison and M. Bridges,Observational constraints on conformal time symmetry, missing matter and double dark energy,JCAP07 (2018) 062 [1208.2542]. [106]BOSScollaboration,Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyαforest of BOSS DR1...

    2018 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Sahni, A

    V. Sahni, A. Shafieloo and A.A. Starobinsky,Model independent evidence for dark energy evolution from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations,Astrophys. J. Lett.793(2014) L40 [1406.2209]. [108]BOSScollaboration,Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, Phys. ...

    2014 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Di Valentino, E.V

    E. Di Valentino, E.V. Linder and A. Melchiorri,Vacuum phase transition solves theH0 tension,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 043528 [1710.02153]

    2018 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Mörtsell, Edvard and Dhawan, Suhail,Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics?, JCAP9(2018) 25 [1801.07260]

    2018 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Poulin, K.K

    V. Poulin, K.K. Boddy, S. Bird and M. Kamionkowski,Implications of an extended dark energy cosmology with massive neutrinos for cosmological tensions,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 123504 [1803.02474]

    2018 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Y. Wang, L. Pogosian, G.-B. Zhao and A. Zucca,Evolution of dark energy reconstructed from the latest observations,Astrophys. J. Lett.869(2018) L8 [1807.03772]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Banihashemi, N

    A. Banihashemi, N. Khosravi and A.H. Shirazi,Phase transition in the dark sector as a proposal to lessen cosmological tensions,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123521 [1808.02472]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Dutta, Ruchika, A

    K. Dutta, Ruchika, A. Roy, A.A. Sen and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,BeyondΛCDM with low and high redshift data: implications for dark energy,Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020) 15 [1808.06623]. – 39 –

    2020 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Banihashemi, N

    A. Banihashemi, N. Khosravi and A.H. Shirazi,Ginzburg-Landau Theory of Dark Energy: A Framework to Study Both Temporal and Spatial Cosmological Tensions Simultaneously,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 083509 [1810.11007]

    2019 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Akarsu, J.D

    Ö. Akarsu, J.D. Barrow, C.V.R. Board, N.M. Uzun and J.A. Vazquez,ScreeningΛin a new modified gravity model,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 846 [1903.11519]

    2019 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Li and A

    X. Li and A. Shafieloo,A Simple Phenomenological Emergent Dark Energy Model can Resolve the Hubble Tension,Astrophys. J. Lett.883(2019) L3 [1906.08275]

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Visinelli, S

    L. Visinelli, S. Vagnozzi and U. Danielsson,Revisiting a negative cosmological constant from low-redshift data,Symmetry11(2019) 1035 [1907.07953]

    2019 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Perez, D

    A. Perez, D. Sudarsky and E. Wilson-Ewing,Resolving theH0 tension with diffusion,Gen. Rel. Grav.53(2021) 7 [2001.07536]

    2021 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Akarsu, N

    Ö. Akarsu, N. Katırcı, S. Kumar, R.C. Nunes, B. Öztürk and S. Sharma,Rastall gravity extension of the standardΛCDM model: theoretical features and observational constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1050 [2004.04074]

    2020 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Ruchika, S.A. Adil, K. Dutta, A. Mukherjee and A.A. Sen,Observational constraints on axion(s) dark energy with a cosmological constant,Phys. Dark Univ.40(2023) 101199 [2005.08813]

    2023 arXiv

  94. [102]

    W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, S. Pan and O. Mena,Emergent Dark Energy, neutrinos and cosmological tensions,Phys. Dark Univ.31(2021) 100762 [2007.02927]

    2021 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Calderón, R

    R. Calderón, R. Gannouji, B. L’Huillier and D. Polarski,Negative cosmological constant in the dark sector?,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 023526 [2008.10237]

    2021 arXiv

  96. [104]

    De Felice, S

    A. De Felice, S. Mukohyama and M.C. Pookkillath,AddressingH0 tension by means of VCDM,Phys. Lett. B816(2021) 136201 [2009.08718]

    2021 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Paliathanasis and G

    A. Paliathanasis and G. Leon,Dynamics of a two scalar field cosmological model with phantom terms,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 075013 [2009.12874]

    2021 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Bonilla, S

    A. Bonilla, S. Kumar and R.C. Nunes,Measurements ofH0 and reconstruction of the dark energy properties from a model-independent joint analysis,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 127 [2011.07140]

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Acquaviva, O

    G. Acquaviva, O. Akarsu, N. Katirci and J.A. Vazquez,Simple-graduated dark energy and spatial curvature,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 023505 [2104.02623]

    2021 arXiv

  100. [108]

    S. Bag, V. Sahni, A. Shafieloo and Y. Shtanov,Phantom Braneworld and the Hubble Tension, Astrophys. J.923(2021) 212 [2107.03271]

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Bernardo, D

    R.C. Bernardo, D. Grandón, J. Said Levi and V.H. Cárdenas,Parametric and nonparametric methods hint dark energy evolution,Phys. Dark Univ.36(2022) 101017 [2111.08289]

    2022 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Escamilla and J.A

    L.A. Escamilla and J.A. Vazquez,Model selection applied to reconstructions of the Dark Energy,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 251 [2111.10457]

    2023 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Sen, S.A

    A.A. Sen, S.A. Adil and S. Sen,Do cosmological observations allow a negativeΛ?,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518(2022) 1098 [2112.10641]

    2022 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Ozulker,Is the dark energy equation of state parameter singular?,Phys

    E. Ozulker,Is the dark energy equation of state parameter singular?,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063509 [2203.04167]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Di Gennaro and Y.C

    S. Di Gennaro and Y.C. Ong,Sign Switching Dark Energy from a Running Barrow Entropy, Universe8(2022) 541 [2205.09311]

    2022 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Akarsu, E.O

    O. Akarsu, E.O. Colgain, E. Özulker, S. Thakur and L. Yin,Inevitable manifestation of wiggles in the expansion of the late Universe,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123526 [2207.10609]. – 40 –

    2023 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Moshafi, H

    H. Moshafi, H. Firouzjahi and A. Talebian,Multiple Transitions in Vacuum Dark Energy and H 0 Tension,Astrophys. J.940(2022) 121 [2208.05583]

    2022 arXiv

  108. [116]

    van de Venn, D

    A. van de Venn, D. Vasak, J. Kirsch and J. Struckmeier,Torsional dark energy in quadratic gauge gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 288 [2211.11868]

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Ong,An Effective Sign Switching Dark Energy: Lotka–Volterra Model of Two Interacting Fluids,Universe9(2023) 437 [2212.04429]

    Y.C. Ong,An Effective Sign Switching Dark Energy: Lotka–Volterra Model of Two Interacting Fluids,Universe9(2023) 437 [2212.04429]

    2023 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Tiwari, B

    Y. Tiwari, B. Ghosh and R.K. Jain,Towards a possible solution to the Hubble tension with Horndeski gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 220 [2301.09382]

    2024 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Malekjani, R.M

    M. Malekjani, R.M. Conville, E.Ó. Colgáin, S. Pourojaghi and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,On redshift evolution and negative dark energy density in Pantheon + Supernovae,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 317 [2301.12725]

    2024 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Ben-Dayan and U

    I. Ben-Dayan and U. Kumar,Emergent Unparticles Dark Energy can restore cosmological concordance,JCAP12(2023) 047 [2302.00067]

    2023 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Vázquez, D

    J.A. Vázquez, D. Tamayo, G. Garcia-Arroyo, I. Gómez-Vargas, I. Quiros and A.A. Sen, Coupled multiscalar field dark energy,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023511 [2305.11396]

    2024 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Alexandre, S

    B. Alexandre, S. Gielen and J. Magueijo,Overall signature of the metric and the cosmological constant,JCAP02(2024) 036 [2306.11502]

    2024 arXiv

  115. [123]

    S.A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A.A. Sen and S. Vagnozzi,Dark energy in light of the early JWST observations: case for a negative cosmological constant?,JCAP10(2023) 072 [2307.12763]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Paraskevas and L

    E.A. Paraskevas and L. Perivolaropoulos,The density of virialized clusters as a probe of dark energy,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531(2024) 1021 [2308.07046]

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Gómez-Valent, A

    A. Gómez-Valent, A. Favale, M. Migliaccio and A.A. Sen,Late-time phenomenology required to solve the H0 tension in view of the cosmic ladders and the anisotropic and angular BAO datasets,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023525 [2309.07795]

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Wen, L.T

    R.Y. Wen, L.T. Hergt, N. Afshordi and D. Scott,A cosmic glitch in gravity,JCAP03(2024) 045 [2311.03028]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    De Felice, S

    A. De Felice, S. Kumar, S. Mukohyama and R.C. Nunes,Observational bounds on extended minimal theories of massive gravity: new limits on the graviton mass,JCAP04(2024) 013 [2311.10530]

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Menci, S.A

    N. Menci, S.A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A.A. Sen and S. Vagnozzi,Negative cosmological constant in the dark energy sector: tests from JWST photometric and spectroscopic observations of high-redshift galaxies,JCAP07(2024) 072 [2401.12659]

    2024 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Gomez-Valent and J

    A. Gomez-Valent and J. Solà Peracaula,Phantom Matter: A Challenging Solution to the Cosmological Tensions,Astrophys. J.975(2024) 64 [2404.18845]

    2024 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Bousis and L

    D. Bousis and L. Perivolaropoulos,Hubble tension tomography: BAO vs SN Ia distance tension,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 103546 [2405.07039]

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    H. Wang, Z.-Y. Peng and Y.-S. Piao,Can recent DESI BAO measurements accommodate a negative cosmological constant?,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L061306 [2406.03395]

    2025 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Colgáin, S

    E.Ó. Colgáin, S. Pourojaghi and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari,Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset forΛCDM,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 286 [2406.06389]

    2025 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Tyagi, S

    U.K. Tyagi, S. Haridasu and S. Basak,Holographic and gravity-thermodynamic approaches in entropic cosmology: Bayesian assessment using late-time data,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 063503 [2406.07446]

    2024 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Y. Toda, W. Giarè, E. Özülker, E. Di Valentino and S. Vagnozzi,Combining pre- and post-recombination new physics to address cosmological tensions: Case study with varying – 41 – electron mass and sign-switching cosmological constant,Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024) 101676 [2407.01173]

    2024 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Sabogal, Ö

    M.A. Sabogal, Ö. Akarsu, A. Bonilla, E. Di Valentino and R.C. Nunes,Exploring new physics in the late Universe’s expansion through non-parametric inference,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 703 [2407.04223]

    2024 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Dwivedi and M

    S. Dwivedi and M. Högås,2D BAO vs. 3D BAO: Solving the Hubble Tension with Bimetric Cosmology,Universe10(2024) 406 [2407.04322]

    2024 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Escamilla, E

    L.A. Escamilla, E. Özülker, Ö. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino and J.A. Vázquez,Improved late-time fits with wavelet extensions ofΛCDM,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.544(2025) 836 [2408.12516]

    2025

  130. [138]

    V.A. Pai, S. Nelleri and T.K. Mathew,DissipativeΛCDM model with causal sign-switching bulk viscous pressure,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 593 [2409.10919]

    2025 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Wen, L.T

    R.Y. Wen, L.T. Hergt, N. Afshordi and D. Scott,A Glitch in Gravity: Cosmic Lorentz-Violation from Fiery Big Bang to Glacial Heat Death,Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc.61 (2025) 435 [2412.09568]

    2025 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Gómez-Valent and J

    A. Gómez-Valent and J. Solà Peracaula,Composite dark energy and the cosmological tensions, Phys. Lett. B864(2025) 139391 [2412.15124]

    2025 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Manoharan,Insights on Granda–Oliveros holographic dark energy: possibility of negative dark energy atz≳2,Eur

    M.T. Manoharan,Insights on Granda–Oliveros holographic dark energy: possibility of negative dark energy atz≳2,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 552

    2024

  134. [142]

    Mukherjee, D

    P. Mukherjee, D. Kumar and A.A. Sen,Quintessential implications of the presence of AdS in the dark energy sector,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063523 [2501.18335]

    2026

  135. [143]

    Efstratiou and L

    D. Efstratiou and L. Perivolaropoulos,Metastable cosmological constant and gravitational bubbles: Ultralate-time transitions in modified gravity,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 123546 [2503.11365]

    2025 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Tamayo,Thermodynamics of sign-switching dark energy models,Int

    D. Tamayo,Thermodynamics of sign-switching dark energy models,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D35 (2026) 2550104 [2503.16272]

    2026

  137. [145]

    Wang and Y.-S

    H. Wang and Y.-S. Piao,Can the universe experience an AdS landscape since matter-radiation equality?,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083553 [2506.04306]

    2025 arXiv

  138. [146]

    González-Fuentes and A

    A. González-Fuentes and A. Gómez-Valent,Reconstruction of dark energy and late-time cosmic expansion using the Weighted Function Regression method,JCAP12(2025) 049 [2506.11758]

    2025

  139. [147]

    Bouhmadi-López and B

    M. Bouhmadi-López and B. Ibarra-Uriondo,Cosmological perturbations for smooth sign-switching dark energy models,Phys. Dark Univ.50(2025) 102129 [2506.18992]

    2025

  140. [148]

    Bouhmadi-López and B

    M. Bouhmadi-López and B. Ibarra-Uriondo,Cosmographic analysis of sign-switching dark energy,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 063559 [2506.12139]

    2025 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Högås and E

    M. Högås and E. Mörtsell,Bimetric gravity improves the fit to DESI BAO and eases the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 103515 [2507.03743]

    2025

  142. [150]

    Gómez-Valent and A

    A. Gómez-Valent and A. González-Fuentes,Effective phantom divide crossing with standard and negative quintessence,Phys. Lett. B872(2026) 140096 [2508.00621]

    2026

  143. [151]

    Tan,Inferring Cosmological Parameters with Evidential Physics-Informed Neural Networks,Universe11(2025) 403 [2509.24327]

    H.S. Tan,Inferring Cosmological Parameters with Evidential Physics-Informed Neural Networks,Universe11(2025) 403 [2509.24327]

    2025

  144. [152]

    Yadav, A

    M. Yadav, A. Dixit, A. Pradhan and M.S. Barak,Empirical validation: Investigating the ΛsCDM model with new DESI BAO observations,JHEAp49(2026) 100453 [2509.26049]

    2026

  145. [153]

    Pedrotti, L.A

    D. Pedrotti, L.A. Escamilla, V. Marra, L. Perivolaropoulos and S. Vagnozzi,BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 043507 [2510.01974]. – 42 –

    2026 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Forconi and A

    M. Forconi and A. Melchiorri,The impact on non-Gaussianities of the ISW-Lensing correlation in non-standard cosmologies,Phys. Dark Univ.50(2025) 102126

    2025

  147. [155]

    Nyergesy, I.G

    E.N. Nyergesy, I.G. Márián, A. Trombettoni and I. Nándori,From negative to positive cosmological constant through decreasing temperature of the universe: Connection with string theory and spacetime foliation results,Phys. Lett. B876(2026) 140380 [2510.02244]

    2026

  148. [156]

    Ghafari, M

    P. Ghafari, M. Najafi, M. Ghodsi Yengejeh, E. Özülker, E. Di Valentino and J.T. Firouzjaee, A Multi-Probe ISW Study of Dark Energy Models with Negative Energy Density: Galaxy Correlations, Lensing Bispectrum, and Planck ISW-Lensing Likelihood, 12, 2025

    2025

  149. [157]

    Akarsu, M

    Ö. Akarsu, M. Caruana, K.F. Dialektopoulos, L.A. Escamilla, E.O. Kahya and J. Levi Said, Hints of sign-changing scalar field energy density and a transient acceleration phase atz∼2 from model-agnostic reconstructions, 2, 2026

    2026

  150. [158]

    Gökçen, Ö

    M. Gökçen, Ö. Akarsu and E. Di Valentino,Revisiting CPL with sign-switching density: To cross or not to cross the NECB,Phys. Dark Univ.52(2026) 102273 [2602.21169]

    2026

  151. [159]

    Banks, M

    T. Banks, M. Dine and E. Gorbatov,Is there a string theory landscape?,JHEP08(2004) 058 [hep-th/0309170]

    2004 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Lehnert,Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Swampland: The Cosmologist’s Handbook to the String-Theoretical Swampland Programme,Fortschritte der Physik74(2026) 70073 [2509.02632]

    K. Lehnert,Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Swampland: The Cosmologist’s Handbook to the String-Theoretical Swampland Programme,Fortschritte der Physik74(2026) 70073 [2509.02632]

    2026

  153. [161]

    Escamilla, O

    L.A. Escamilla, O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino and J.A. Vazquez,Model-independent reconstruction of the interacting dark energy kernel: Binned and Gaussian process,JCAP11 (2023) 051 [2305.16290]

    2023 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Bouhmadi-López and B

    M. Bouhmadi-López and B. Ibarra-Uriondo,The Sign-Switching of the Cosmological Constant, 2, 2026 [2602.16795]

    2026

  155. [163]

    Ibarra-Uriondo and M

    B. Ibarra-Uriondo and M. Bouhmadi-López,Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Smooth Transitions with Recent DESI DR2 Observations,Phys. Dark Univ.52(2026) 102351 [2602.12347]

    2026 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Brownsberger, D

    S.R. Brownsberger, D. Brout, D. Scolnic, C.W. Stubbs and A.G. Riess,Dependence of Cosmological Constraints on Gray Photometric Zero-point Uncertainties of Supernova Surveys,Astrophys. J.944(2023) 188 [2110.03486]

    2023 arXiv

  157. [165]

    Crittenden and N

    R.G. Crittenden and N. Turok,Looking for Lambda with the Rees-Sciama effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.76(1996) 575 [astro-ph/9510072]

    1996 arXiv

  158. [166]

    G.-B. Zhao, L. Pogosian, A. Silvestri and J. Zylberberg,Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic surveys,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 083513 [0809.3791]

    2009 arXiv

  159. [167]

    de Putter, D

    R. de Putter, D. Huterer and E.V. Linder,Measuring the Speed of Dark: Detecting Dark Energy Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 103513 [1002.1311]

    2010 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Giannantonio, R

    T. Giannantonio, R. Scranton, R.G. Crittenden, R.C. Nichol, S.P. Boughn, A.D. Myers et al., Combined analysis of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and cosmological implications,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 123520 [0801.4380]

    2008 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Stölzner, A

    B. Stölzner, A. Cuoco, J. Lesgourgues and M. Bilicki,Updated tomographic analysis of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and implications for dark energy,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 063506 [1710.03238]

    2018 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Kovács, R

    A. Kovács, R. Beck, A. Smith, G. Rácz, I. Csabai and I. Szapudi,Evidence for a high-z ISW signal from supervoids in the distribution of eBOSS quasars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.513 (2022) 15 [2107.13038]

    2022 arXiv

  163. [171]

    Bardeen,Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,Phys

    J.M. Bardeen,Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 1882

    1980

  164. [172]

    Torrado and A

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis,Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models, JCAP05(2021) 057 [2005.05290]. – 43 –

    2021 arXiv

  165. [173]

    Neal,Taking Bigger Metropolis Steps by Dragging Fast Variables, 2, 2005

    R.M. Neal,Taking Bigger Metropolis Steps by Dragging Fast Variables, 2, 2005

    2005

  166. [174]

    Lewis, A

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby,Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models,Astrophys. J.538(2000) 473 [astro-ph/9911177]

    2000 arXiv

  167. [175]

    Howlett, A

    C. Howlett, A. Lewis, A. Hall and A. Challinor,Cmb power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology,JCAP1204(2012) 027 [astro-ph/1201.3654]

    2012 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Pisanti, A

    O. Pisanti, A. Cirillo, S. Esposito, F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele et al.,Parthenope public code for big bang nucleosynthesis,Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 956

    2008

  169. [177]

    Gelman and D.B

    A. Gelman and D.B. Rubin,Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statistical Science7(1992) 457

    1992

  170. [178]

    Lewis,GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,JCAP08(2025) 025 [1910.13970]

    A. Lewis,GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,JCAP08(2025) 025 [1910.13970]

    2025 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Cartis, J

    C. Cartis, J. Fiala, B. Marteau and L. Roberts,Improving the flexibility and robustness of model-based derivative-free optimization solvers, 2018

    2018

  172. [180]

    Cartis, L

    C. Cartis, L. Roberts and O. Sheridan-Methven,Escaping local minima with local derivative-free methods: a numerical investigation,Optimization71(2021) 2343–2373 [1812.11343]

    2021 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Powell,The bobyqa algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives, Tech

    M.J.D. Powell,The bobyqa algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives, Tech. Rep. DAMTP 2009/NA06, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Aug., 2009). [202]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. ...

    2009 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Carron, M

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis,CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps,JCAP09 (2022) 039 [2206.07773]

    2022 arXiv

  175. [183]

    Balkenhol, C

    L. Balkenhol, C. Trendafilova, K. Benabed and S. Galli,candl: cosmic microwave background analysis with a differentiable likelihood,Astron. Astrophys.686(2024) A10 [2401.13433]. [207]SPT-3Gcollaboration,Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019–2020 S...

    2024 arXiv

  176. [184]

    Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys

    A.G. Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934(2022) L7 [2112.04510]

    2022 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Akaike,A new look at the statistical model identification,IEEE Trans

    H. Akaike,A new look at the statistical model identification,IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19(1974) 716

    1974

  178. [186]

    Schwarz,Estimating the Dimension of a Model,Annals Statist.6(1978) 461

    G. Schwarz,Estimating the Dimension of a Model,Annals Statist.6(1978) 461

    1978

  179. [187]

    Spiegelhalter, N.G

    D.J. Spiegelhalter, N.G. Best, B.P. Carlin and A. van der Linde,Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64(2002) 583

    2002

  180. [188]

    Watanabe,A widely applicable bayesian information criterion, 2012

    S. Watanabe,A widely applicable bayesian information criterion, 2012. – 44 – [214]DEScollaboration,Assessing tension metrics with dark energy survey and Planck data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505(2021) 6179 [2012.09554]

    2012 arXiv

  181. [189]

    Raveri, G

    M. Raveri, G. Zacharegkas and W. Hu,Quantifying concordance of correlated cosmological data sets,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103527 [1912.04880]

    2020 arXiv

  182. [190]

    Avila, A

    F. Avila, A. Bernui, A. Bonilla and R.C. Nunes,InferringS8(z)andγ(z)with cosmic growth rate measurements using machine learning,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 594 [2201.07829]. [217]DEScollaboration, T.M.C. Abbott et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints fro...

    2022 arXiv

  183. [191]

    Schaefer,The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in cosmologies with coupled dark matter and dark energy,Mon

    B.M. Schaefer,The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in cosmologies with coupled dark matter and dark energy,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.388(2008) 1403 [0803.2239]

    2008 arXiv

  184. [192]

    Nakamura, A

    S. Nakamura, A. De Felice, R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa,Constraints on massive vector dark energy models from integrated Sachs-Wolfe-galaxy cross-correlations,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 063533 [1811.07541]. [222]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing,Astron...

    2019 arXiv

  185. [193]

    Bassett, S

    B.A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa and D. Wands,Inflation dynamics and reheating,Rev. Mod. Phys. 78(2006) 537 [astro-ph/0507632]

    2006 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Malik,Cosmological perturbations in an inflationary universe, phd thesis, Portsmouth U., 1, 2001, [astro-ph/0101563]

    K.A. Malik,Cosmological perturbations in an inflationary universe, phd thesis, Portsmouth U., 1, 2001, [astro-ph/0101563]

    2001 arXiv

  187. [195]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki,Cosmological Perturbation Theory,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.78 (1984) 1

    1984

  188. [196]

    Ma and E

    C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger,Cosmological perturbation theory in the synchronous and conformal Newtonian gauges,Astrophys. J.455(1995) 7 [astro-ph/9506072]

    1995 arXiv

  189. [197]

    Jeffreys,The Theory of Probability, Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences (1939)

    H. Jeffreys,The Theory of Probability, Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences (1939). – 45 –

    1939

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.