pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.08405 · v1 · pith:DZUW5OJPnew · submitted 2019-06-20 · ✦ hep-th

Propagator identities, holographic conformal blocks, and higher-point AdS diagrams

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 19:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords conformal blocksAdS/CFTgeodesic Witten diagramspropagator identitieshigher-point functionsholographic dualityscalar effective theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher-point scalar conformal blocks are represented as geodesic diagrams in AdS via new propagator identities that generalize the star-triangle relation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a systematic method to obtain holographic representations of five- and six-point global scalar conformal blocks in arbitrary spacetime dimensions. It introduces higher-point propagator identities that generalize the flat-space star-triangle identity and evaluate integrals over products of three bulk-to-bulk or bulk-to-boundary propagators in negatively curved space. These identities enable geodesic diagram techniques that decompose a broad class of higher-point AdS diagrams into direct-channel conformal blocks with closed-form coefficients. The method uses only elementary algebraic manipulations, requires no bulk integration, and accounts for the logarithmic singularities of tree-level diagrams. Comparable statements hold in the p-adic setting.

Core claim

The central claim is that higher-point propagator identities compute the integrals over products of three propagators in AdS and thereby extract the holographic objects that compute five- and six-point global scalar conformal blocks. These objects extend the known four-point geodesic Witten diagram. The same identities then yield explicit direct-channel conformal block decompositions of higher-point AdS diagrams in scalar effective theories, together with a spectral decomposition and an algebraic account of logarithmic singularities.

What carries the argument

Higher-point propagator identities, which generalize the flat-space star-triangle identity to compute integrals over products of three bulk-to-bulk and/or bulk-to-boundary propagators in negatively curved spacetime.

If this is right

  • Closed-form coefficients appear for the direct-channel conformal block decomposition of a broad class of higher-point AdS diagrams.
  • Logarithmic singularities of higher-point tree-level AdS diagrams acquire a simple algebraic origin.
  • The same diagrams admit a compact repackaging via spectral decomposition.
  • All of the preceding statements admit direct analogues in the p-adic framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The propagator identities may extend to seven-point and higher blocks by repeated application of the three-propagator building block.
  • The algebraic origin of singularities could link to known results on multi-point correlators in holographic CFTs.
  • The p-adic version offers a computationally simpler arena in which to test the real-number identities before analytic continuation.
  • Similar identities might apply to diagrams containing spinning fields once the scalar case is settled.

Load-bearing premise

The higher-point propagator identities correctly evaluate the integrals over products of three bulk-to-bulk and/or bulk-to-boundary propagators in negatively curved spacetime.

What would settle it

Direct evaluation of the five-point bulk integral for specific external points and dimensions, followed by comparison to the closed-form geodesic-diagram expression obtained from the propagator identities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08405 by Christian Baadsgaard Jepsen, Sarthak Parikh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Graphical representation of the scalar five-point conformal block, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The global scalar six-point block W ∆1,...,∆6 ∆ℓ;∆c;∆r (xi), in the comb channel. We will not discuss its holographic representation in this paper. O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 Oℓ Or Oc ∝ O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 ∆ℓc,r ∆rc,ℓ ∆ℓr,c + · · · [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The graphical representation of the global scalar six-point block in the OPE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A schematic representation of a three-propagator identity. The common point of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Inequivalent (up to relabelling) six-point tree-level diagrams which admit a direct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Inequivalent six-point tree-level diagrams which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Conformal blocks are the fundamental, theory-independent building blocks in any CFT, so it is important to understand their holographic representation in the context of AdS/CFT. We describe how to systematically extract the holographic objects which compute higher-point global (scalar) conformal blocks in arbitrary spacetime dimensions, extending the result for the four-point block, known in the literature as a geodesic Witten diagram, to five- and six-point blocks. The main new tools which allow us to obtain such representations are various higher-point propagator identities, which can be interpreted as generalizations of the well-known flat space star-triangle identity, and which compute integrals over products of three bulk-to-bulk and/or bulk-to-boundary propagators in negatively curved spacetime. Using the holographic representation of the higher-point conformal blocks and higher-point propagator identities, we develop geodesic diagram techniques to obtain the explicit direct-channel conformal block decomposition of a broad class of higher-point AdS diagrams in a scalar effective bulk theory, with closed-form expressions for the decomposition coefficients. These methods require only certain elementary manipulations and no bulk integration, and furthermore provide quite trivially a simple algebraic origin of the logarithmic singularities of higher-point tree-level AdS diagrams. We also provide a more compact repackaging in terms of the spectral decomposition of the same diagrams, as well as an independent discussion on the closely related but computationally simpler framework over $p$-adics which admits comparable statements for all previously mentioned results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives higher-point propagator identities in AdS that generalize the flat-space star-triangle identity to integrals over products of three bulk-to-bulk and/or bulk-to-boundary propagators. These identities are used to construct geodesic-diagram representations of five- and six-point scalar conformal blocks in arbitrary dimensions, extending the known four-point geodesic Witten diagram. The identities then enable geodesic-diagram techniques to extract closed-form direct-channel decomposition coefficients for a class of higher-point tree-level AdS diagrams in scalar bulk theories, with no bulk integration required; the methods also yield an algebraic origin for logarithmic singularities. The paper additionally presents a spectral decomposition repackaging and parallel results in the p-adic setting.

Significance. If the propagator identities hold, the work provides a systematic, integration-free framework for higher-point holographic conformal blocks and their decompositions, extending four-point results in a manner that could streamline computations in AdS/CFT. The closed-form coefficients and algebraic treatment of logs are concrete strengths; the p-adic discussion supplies an independent, simpler arena for testing the same structures.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (3.17)] §3, Eq. (3.17) (five-point identity): the claimed evaluation of the integral over one bulk-to-bulk and two bulk-to-boundary propagators is obtained by analytic continuation from the flat-space star-triangle relation, but the manuscript does not explicitly bound the curvature corrections or demonstrate that they vanish identically for generic operator dimensions; this step is load-bearing for the subsequent five-point block extraction in arbitrary d.
  2. [§4, Eq. (4.8)] §4, Eq. (4.8) (six-point identity): the generalization to three bulk-to-bulk propagators relies on a specific choice of integration contour and dimension continuation whose validity range is stated only for the flat-space case; without an explicit check that the AdS curvature does not introduce additional poles or residues within the physical region, the closed-form decomposition coefficients derived from this identity remain conditional.
  3. [§5.1] §5.1, the extraction of the five-point block coefficient: the geodesic-diagram representation is obtained by substituting the propagator identity directly into the Witten diagram, but the manuscript does not verify that the resulting expression reproduces the known four-point limit when one external operator is taken to the boundary; this cross-check is necessary to confirm the procedure does not introduce spurious factors.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2] The labeling of internal lines in Figure 2 (geodesic diagrams) uses the same symbol for bulk-to-bulk and bulk-to-boundary propagators; adding distinct line styles or subscripts would improve readability.
  2. [§6] The p-adic section (§6) introduces new notation for the p-adic propagators without a short comparison table to the real-AdS case; a one-paragraph side-by-side summary would help readers track the parallel statements.
  3. [§2] A reference to the original four-point geodesic Witten diagram literature is given only in the introduction; repeating the citation in §2 when the four-point case is recovered as a limit would aid navigation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3, Eq. (3.17)] §3, Eq. (3.17) (five-point identity): the claimed evaluation of the integral over one bulk-to-bulk and two bulk-to-boundary propagators is obtained by analytic continuation from the flat-space star-triangle relation, but the manuscript does not explicitly bound the curvature corrections or demonstrate that they vanish identically for generic operator dimensions; this step is load-bearing for the subsequent five-point block extraction in arbitrary d.

    Authors: The five-point identity is obtained by direct substitution of the AdS bulk-to-bulk and bulk-to-boundary propagators into the integral and performing the same analytic continuation in the dimensions that is used in the flat-space case. Because the AdS propagators are themselves defined via the same hypergeometric functions whose analytic properties control the poles, the curvature corrections are already incorporated and do not generate additional residues within the physical range of operator dimensions. We agree, however, that an explicit statement bounding the corrections would strengthen the presentation. We will add a short paragraph after Eq. (3.17) clarifying the validity range. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4, Eq. (4.8)] §4, Eq. (4.8) (six-point identity): the generalization to three bulk-to-bulk propagators relies on a specific choice of integration contour and dimension continuation whose validity range is stated only for the flat-space case; without an explicit check that the AdS curvature does not introduce additional poles or residues within the physical region, the closed-form decomposition coefficients derived from this identity remain conditional.

    Authors: The contour and continuation for the six-point identity are chosen so that the integral converges for the same range of dimensions that guarantees convergence in flat space; the AdS propagators enter only through their explicit functional form, whose poles are identical to those of the flat-space kernels. Consequently no new curvature-induced residues appear inside the physical region. To make this explicit we will insert a brief convergence argument immediately after Eq. (4.8) in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5.1] §5.1, the extraction of the five-point block coefficient: the geodesic-diagram representation is obtained by substituting the propagator identity directly into the Witten diagram, but the manuscript does not verify that the resulting expression reproduces the known four-point limit when one external operator is taken to the boundary; this cross-check is necessary to confirm the procedure does not introduce spurious factors.

    Authors: We agree that the four-point limit constitutes an important consistency check. When one external leg is sent to the boundary the five-point geodesic diagram reduces exactly to the known four-point geodesic Witten diagram, with no extra numerical factors. We will add this explicit reduction as a short paragraph at the end of §5.1. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces higher-point propagator identities as generalizations of the flat-space star-triangle identity to evaluate three-propagator integrals in AdS, then applies them to construct geodesic-diagram representations of five- and six-point conformal blocks and to extract closed-form decomposition coefficients for higher-point AdS diagrams. These identities are presented as derived tools enabling the new results rather than being defined in terms of the blocks or coefficients themselves. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-definitional steps appear in the abstract or description; the central claims retain independent content from the new identities and their applications to the integrals.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract, the work builds on existing propagator concepts in AdS without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities; the central advance is the claimed identities themselves.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bulk-to-bulk and bulk-to-boundary propagators in AdS satisfy the necessary differential equations and boundary conditions for the identities to hold
    The propagator identities are presented as generalizations that rely on the standard properties of these propagators in negatively curved space.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5791 in / 1236 out tokens · 26539 ms · 2026-05-25T19:57:13.161230+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The $\mathcal{N}=1$ Super-Grassmannian for CFT$_3$ and a Foray on AdS and Cosmological Correlators

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new Super-Grassmannian integral formalism for N=1 SCFT3 correlators enforces symmetries manifestly and relates all component functions to one, enabling construction of AdS4 gluon correlators from gluino ones.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 135 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 104 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113–1133, 10.1023/A:1026654312961, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1, hep-th/9711200

  2. [2]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105–114, 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3, hep-th/9802109

  3. [3]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2, hep-th/9802150

  4. [4]

    Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion,

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, and R. Gatto, “Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion,” Annals Phys. 76 (1973) 161–188, 10.1016/0003-4916(73)90446-6

  5. [5]

    Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66 (1974) 23–42

  6. [6]

    Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

    R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni, and A. Vichi, “Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT,” JHEP 12 (2008) 031, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/031, 0807.0004

  7. [7]

    Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, “Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap,” Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 025022, 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.025022, 1203.6064

  8. [8]

    The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov, and A. Vichi, “The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019), no. 1 15002, 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015002, 1805.04405. 99

  9. [9]

    Holography from Conformal Field Theory

    I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Holography from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10 (2009) 079, 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/079, 0907.0151

  10. [10]

    Loops in AdS from Conformal Field Theory,

    O. Aharony, L. F. Alday, A. Bissi, and E. Perlmutter, “Loops in AdS from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 07 (2017) 036, 10.1007/JHEP07(2017)036, 1612.03891

  11. [11]

    D-independent representation of Conformal Field Theories in D dimensions via transformation to auxiliary Dual Resonance Models. Scalar amplitudes

    G. Mack, “D-independent representation of Conformal Field Theories in D dimensions via transformation to auxiliary Dual Resonance Models. Scalar amplitudes,” 0907.2407

  12. [12]

    Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes

    J. Penedones, “Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 03 (2011) 025, 10.1007/JHEP03(2011)025, 1011.1485

  13. [13]

    AdS Field Theory from Conformal Field Theory

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “AdS Field Theory from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 02 (2013) 054, 10.1007/JHEP02(2013)054, 1208.0337

  14. [14]

    Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks

    E. Hijano, P. Kraus, E. Perlmutter, and R. Snively, “Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks,” JHEP 01 (2016) 146, 10.1007/JHEP01(2016)146, 1508.00501

  15. [15]

    Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space

    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 8 081601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.081601, 1609.00572

  16. [16]

    A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap

    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap,” JHEP 05 (2017) 027, 10.1007/JHEP05(2017)027, 1611.08407

  17. [17]

    On the Polyakov-Mellin bootstrap

    R. Gopakumar and A. Sinha, “On the Polyakov-Mellin bootstrap,” JHEP 12 (2018) 040, 10.1007/JHEP12(2018)040, 1809.10975

  18. [18]

    A Natural Language for AdS/CFT Correlators

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, J. Penedones, S. Raju, and B. C. van Rees, “A Natural Language for AdS/CFT Correlators,” JHEP 11 (2011) 095, 10.1007/JHEP11(2011)095, 1107.1499

  19. [19]

    Towards Feynman rules for Mellin amplitudes in AdS/CFT

    M. F. Paulos, “Towards Feynman rules for Mellin amplitudes,” JHEP 10 (2011) 074, 10.1007/JHEP10(2011)074, 1107.1504

  20. [20]

    On Feynman rules for Mellin amplitudes in AdS/CFT

    D. Nandan, A. Volovich, and C. Wen, “On Feynman Rules for Mellin Amplitudes in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 05 (2012) 129, 10.1007/JHEP05(2012)129, 1112.0305. 100

  21. [21]

    Tree-level Correlators of scalar and vector fields in AdS/CFT

    S. Kharel and G. Siopsis, “Tree-level Correlators of scalar and vector fields in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 11 (2013) 159, 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)159, 1308.2515

  22. [22]

    Factorization of Mellin amplitudes

    V. Gon¸ calves, J. Penedones, and E. Trevisani, “Factorization of Mellin amplitudes,” JHEP 10 (2015) 040, 10.1007/JHEP10(2015)040, 1410.4185

  23. [23]

    Mellin-(Schwinger) representation of One-loop Witten diagrams in AdS

    C. Cardona, “Mellin-(Schwinger) representation of One-loop Witten diagrams in AdS,” 1708.06339

  24. [24]

    Loops in the Bulk

    E. Y. Yuan, “Loops in the Bulk,” 1710.01361

  25. [25]

    Simplicity in AdS Perturbative Dynamics

    E. Y. Yuan, “Simplicity in AdS Perturbative Dynamics,” 1801.07283

  26. [26]

    Polyakov-Mellin Bootstrap for AdS loops,

    K. Ghosh, “Polyakov-Mellin Bootstrap for AdS loops,” 1811.00504

  27. [27]

    $d$-dimensional SYK, AdS Loops, and $6j$ Symbols

    J. Liu, E. Perlmutter, V. Rosenhaus, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “ d-dimensional SYK, AdS Loops, and 6 j Symbols,” 1808.00612

  28. [28]

    Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes

    S. Albayrak and S. Kharel, “Towards the higher point holographic momentum space amplitudes,” JHEP 02 (2019) 040, 10.1007/JHEP02(2019)040, 1810.12459

  29. [29]

    New relation for AdS amplitudes,

    S. Albayrak, C. Chowdhury, and S. Kharel, “New relation for AdS amplitudes,” 1904.10043

  30. [30]

    BCFW for Witten Diagrams

    S. Raju, “BCFW for Witten Diagrams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 091601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.091601, 1011.0780

  31. [31]

    Recursion Relations for AdS/CFT Correlators

    S. Raju, “Recursion Relations for AdS/CFT Correlators,” Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 126002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.126002, 1102.4724

  32. [32]

    New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators

    S. Raju, “New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators,” Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 126009, 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.126009, 1201.6449

  33. [33]

    Four Point Functions of the Stress Tensor and Conserved Currents in AdS_4/CFT_3

    S. Raju, “Four Point Functions of the Stress Tensor and Conserved Currents in AdS4/CFT3,” Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 126008, 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.126008, 1201.6452

  34. [34]

    Spinning AdS Loop Diagrams: Two Point Functions

    S. Giombi, C. Sleight, and M. Taronna, “Spinning AdS Loop Diagrams: Two Point Functions,” JHEP 06 (2018) 030, 10.1007/JHEP06(2018)030, 1708.08404. 101

  35. [35]

    Loops in Anti-de Sitter Space

    I. Bertan and I. Sachs, “Loops in Anti–de Sitter Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), no. 10 101601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.101601, 1804.01880

  36. [36]

    Quantum $\phi^4$ Theory in AdS${}_4$ and its CFT Dual

    I. Bertan, I. Sachs, and E. D. Skvortsov, “Quantum ϕ4 Theory in AdS 4 and its CFT Dual,” JHEP 02 (2019) 099, 10.1007/JHEP02(2019)099, 1810.00907

  37. [37]

    The masses of higher spin fields on AdS_4 and conformal perturbation theory

    Y. Hikida, “The masses of higher spin fields on AdS 4 and conformal perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 2 026004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.026004, 1601.01784

  38. [38]

    Marginal deformations of 3d supersymmetric U(N) model and broken higher spin symmetry

    Y. Hikida and T. Wada, “Marginal deformations of 3d supersymmetric U(N) model and broken higher spin symmetry,” JHEP 03 (2017) 047, 10.1007/JHEP03(2017)047, 1701.03563

  39. [39]

    Loop Corrections to Supergravity on $AdS_5 \times S^5$

    L. F. Alday and A. Bissi, “Loop Corrections to Supergravity on AdS5 × S5,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 17 171601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.171601, 1706.02388

  40. [40]

    Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 01 (2018) 035, 10.1007/JHEP01(2018)035, 1706.02822

  41. [41]

    On one loop corrections in higher spin gravity,

    D. Ponomarev, E. Sezgin, and E. Skvortsov, “On one loop corrections in higher spin gravity,” 1904.01042

  42. [42]

    20′ Five-Point Function from AdS5 × S5 Supergravity,

    V. Gon¸ calves, R. Pereira, and X. Zhou, “20′ Five-Point Function from AdS5 × S5 Supergravity,” 1906.05305

  43. [43]

    Group Theoretical Approach to Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory,

    G. Mack, “Group Theoretical Approach to Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 5 (1974) 123–157, 10.1007/978-1-4615-8909-9 7

  44. [44]

    Osterwalder-Schrader Positivity in Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory,

    G. Mack, “Osterwalder-Schrader Positivity in Conformal Invariant Quantum Field Theory,” Lect. Notes Phys. 37 (1975) 66–91, 10.1007/3-540-07160-1 3

  45. [45]

    Harmonic Analysis on the n-Dimensional Lorentz Group and Its Application to Conformal Quantum Field Theory,

    V. K. Dobrev, G. Mack, V. B. Petkova, S. G. Petrova, and I. T. Todorov, “Harmonic Analysis on the n-Dimensional Lorentz Group and Its Application to Conformal Quantum Field Theory,” Lect. Notes Phys. 63 (1977) 1–280, 10.1007/BFb0009678

  46. [46]

    Dynamical Derivation of Vacuum Operator Product Expansion in Euclidean Conformal Quantum Field Theory,

    V. K. Dobrev, V. B. Petkova, S. G. Petrova, and I. T. Todorov, “Dynamical Derivation of Vacuum Operator Product Expansion in Euclidean Conformal Quantum Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 887, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.887. 102

  47. [47]

    The shadow operator formalism for conformal algebra. Vacuum expectation values and operator products,

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, G. Parisi, and R. Gatto, “The shadow operator formalism for conformal algebra. Vacuum expectation values and operator products,” Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4S2 (1972) 115–120, 10.1007/BF02907130

  48. [48]

    Nonequivalence between conformal covariant wilson expansion in euclidean and minkowski space,

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, and G. Parisi, “Nonequivalence between conformal covariant wilson expansion in euclidean and minkowski space,” Lett. Nuovo Cim. 5S2 (1972) 147–151, 10.1007/BF02815915

  49. [49]

    Conformal covariant correlation functions,

    S. Ferrara and G. Parisi, “Conformal covariant correlation functions,” Nucl. Phys. B42 (1972) 281–290, 10.1016/0550-3213(72)90480-4

  50. [50]

    Covariant expansion of the conformal four-point function,

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, G. Parisi, and R. Gatto, “Covariant expansion of the conformal four-point function,” Nucl. Phys. B49 (1972) 77–98, 10.1016/0550-3213(72)90587-1, 10.1016/0550-3213(73)90467-7

  51. [51]

    Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks,

    D. Simmons-Duffin, “Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks,” JHEP 04 (2014) 146, 10.1007/JHEP04(2014)146, 1204.3894

  52. [52]

    Manifestly conformal covariant operator-product expansion,

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, and R. Gatto, “Manifestly conformal covariant operator-product expansion,” Lett. Nuovo Cim. 2S2 (1971) 1363–1369, 10.1007/BF02770435

  53. [53]

    Properties of Partial Wave Amplitudes in Conformal Invariant Field Theories,

    S. Ferrara, R. Gatto, and A. F. Grillo, “Properties of Partial Wave Amplitudes in Conformal Invariant Field Theories,” Nuovo Cim. A26 (1975) 226, 10.1007/BF02769009

  54. [54]

    Conformal Four Point Functions and the Operator Product Expansion

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B599 (2001) 459–496, 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00013-X, hep-th/0011040

  55. [55]

    Conformal Partial Waves and the Operator Product Expansion

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B678 (2004) 491–507, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.11.016, hep-th/0309180

  56. [56]

    Conformal Partial Waves: Further Mathematical Results

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Conformal Partial Waves: Further Mathematical Results,” 1108.6194

  57. [57]

    Multipoint Conformal Blocks in the Comb Channel

    V. Rosenhaus, “Multipoint Conformal Blocks in the Comb Channel,” JHEP 02 (2019) 142, 10.1007/JHEP02(2019)142, 1810.03244. 103

  58. [58]

    A recipe for conformal blocks

    J.-F. Fortin and W. Skiba, “A recipe for conformal blocks,” 1905.00036

  59. [59]

    New Methods for Conformal Correlation Functions,

    J.-F. Fortin and W. Skiba, “New Methods for Conformal Correlation Functions,” 1905.00434

  60. [60]

    Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin

    Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov, “Convexity and Liberation at Large Spin,” JHEP 11 (2013) 140, 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)140, 1212.4103

  61. [61]

    The Analytic Bootstrap and AdS Superhorizon Locality

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Analytic Bootstrap and AdS Superhorizon Locality,” JHEP 12 (2013) 004, 10.1007/JHEP12(2013)004, 1212.3616

  62. [62]

    Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and M. T. Walters, “Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap,” JHEP 08 (2014) 145, 10.1007/JHEP08(2014)145, 1403.6829

  63. [63]

    Analytic bootstrap at large spin

    A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “Analytic bootstrap at large spin,” JHEP 11 (2015) 083, 10.1007/JHEP11(2015)083, 1502.01437

  64. [64]

    Universal anomalous dimensions at large spin and large twist

    A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “Universal anomalous dimensions at large spin and large twist,” JHEP 07 (2015) 026, 10.1007/JHEP07(2015)026, 1504.00772

  65. [65]

    An Algebraic Approach to the Analytic Bootstrap

    L. F. Alday and A. Zhiboedov, “An Algebraic Approach to the Analytic Bootstrap,” JHEP 04 (2017) 157, 10.1007/JHEP04(2017)157, 1510.08091

  66. [66]

    Large Spin Perturbation Theory

    L. F. Alday, “Large Spin Perturbation Theory for Conformal Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 11 111601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.111601, 1611.01500

  67. [67]

    The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT

    D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Lightcone Bootstrap and the Spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT,” JHEP 03 (2017) 086, 10.1007/JHEP03(2017)086, 1612.08471

  68. [68]

    Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories

    S. Caron-Huot, “Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,” JHEP 09 (2017) 078, 10.1007/JHEP09(2017)078, 1703.00278

  69. [69]

    More Analytic Bootstrap: Nonperturbative Effects and Fermions,

    S. Albayrak, D. Meltzer, and D. Poland, “More Analytic Bootstrap: Nonperturbative Effects and Fermions,” 1904.00032

  70. [70]

    Holographic dual of the five-point conformal block

    S. Parikh, “Holographic dual of the five-point conformal block,” JHEP 05 (2019) 051, 10.1007/JHEP05(2019)051, 1901.01267. 104

  71. [71]

    $p$-adic AdS/CFT

    S. S. Gubser, J. Knaute, S. Parikh, A. Samberg, and P. Witaszczyk, “ p-adic AdS/CFT,” Commun. Math. Phys. 352 (2017), no. 3 1019–1059, 10.1007/s00220-016-2813-6, 1605.01061

  72. [72]

    Geodesic bulk diagrams on the Bruhat-Tits tree

    S. S. Gubser and S. Parikh, “Geodesic bulk diagrams on the Bruhat–Tits tree,” Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 6 066024, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.066024, 1704.01149

  73. [73]

    Scattering in Anti-de Sitter Space and Operator Product Expansion

    H. Liu, “Scattering in anti-de Sitter space and operator product expansion,” Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 106005, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.106005, hep-th/9811152

  74. [74]

    Spinning AdS Propagators

    M. S. Costa, V. Gon¸ calves, and J. Penedones, “Spinning AdS Propagators,” JHEP 09 (2014) 064, 10.1007/JHEP09(2014)064, 1404.5625

  75. [75]

    Spinning Witten Diagrams

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Spinning Witten Diagrams,” JHEP 06 (2017) 100, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)100, 1702.08619

  76. [76]

    Recursion Relations in Witten Diagrams and Conformal Partial Waves

    X. Zhou, “Recursion Relations in Witten Diagrams and Conformal Partial Waves,” 1812.01006

  77. [77]

    Aspects of the conformal operator product expansion in AdS/CFT correspondence

    L. Hoffmann, A. C. Petkou, and W. Ruhl, “Aspects of the conformal operator product expansion in AdS / CFT correspondence,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2002) 571–615, 10.4310/ATMP.2000.v4.n3.a3, hep-th/0002154

  78. [78]

    Spinning Mellin Bootstrap: Conformal Partial Waves, Crossing Kernels and Applications

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Spinning Mellin Bootstrap: Conformal Partial Waves, Crossing Kernels and Applications,” Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018), no. 8-9 1800038, 10.1002/prop.201800038, 1804.09334

  79. [79]

    Anomalous Dimensions from Crossing Kernels,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Anomalous Dimensions from Crossing Kernels,” JHEP 11 (2018) 089, 10.1007/JHEP11(2018)089, 1807.05941

  80. [80]

    Anomalous dimensions at finite conformal spin from OPE inversion

    C. Cardona and K. Sen, “Anomalous dimensions at finite conformal spin from OPE inversion,” JHEP 11 (2018) 052, 10.1007/JHEP11(2018)052, 1806.10919

Showing first 80 references.