Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improved current density and magnetisation reconstruction through vector magnetic field measurements

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.06788 v1 pith:E4QGGKPH submitted 2020-05-14 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-phphysics.data-an

Improved current density and magnetisation reconstruction through vector magnetic field measurements

classification physics.app-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-phphysics.data-an
keywords reconstructionmagnetisationcurrentfielddensitymagneticmeasurementsstray
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Stray magnetic fields contain significant information about the electronic and magnetic properties of condensed matter systems. For two-dimensional (2D) systems, stray field measurements can even allow full determination of the source quantity. For instance, a 2D map of the stray magnetic field can be uniquely transformed into the 2D current density that gave rise to the field and, under some conditions, into the equivalent 2D magnetisation. However, implementing these transformations typically requires truncation of the initial data and involves singularities that may introduce errors, artefacts, and amplify noise. Here we investigate the possibility of mitigating these issues through vector measurements. For each scenario (current reconstruction and magnetisation reconstruction) the different possible reconstruction pathways are analysed and their performances compared. In particular, we find that the simultaneous measurement of both in-plane components ($B_x$ and $B_y$) enables near-ideal reconstruction of the current density, without singularity or truncation artefacts, which constitutes a significant improvement over reconstruction based on a single component (e.g. $B_z$). On the other hand, for magnetisation reconstruction, a single measurement of the out-of-plane field ($B_z$) is generally the best choice, regardless of the magnetisation direction. We verify these findings experimentally using nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry in the case of a 2D current density and a 2D magnet with perpendicular magnetisation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.