REVIEW 2 cited by
Word-Level Explanations for Analyzing Bias in Text-to-Image Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Word-Level Explanations for Analyzing Bias in Text-to-Image Models
read the original abstract
Text-to-image models take a sentence (i.e., prompt) and generate images associated with this input prompt. These models have created award wining-art, videos, and even synthetic datasets. However, text-to-image (T2I) models can generate images that underrepresent minorities based on race and sex. This paper investigates which word in the input prompt is responsible for bias in generated images. We introduce a method for computing scores for each word in the prompt; these scores represent its influence on biases in the model's output. Our method follows the principle of \emph{explaining by removing}, leveraging masked language models to calculate the influence scores. We perform experiments on Stable Diffusion to demonstrate that our method identifies the replication of societal stereotypes in generated images.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Testing chatbots on the creation of encoders for audio conditioned image generation
All chatbot-designed audio encoders failed to align with CLIP text embeddings and produced incoherent images, while showing a surprising architectural similarity across chatbots.
-
Effectively obtaining acoustic, visual and textual data from videos
A video-processing pipeline created a 2.24 million-sample audio-image-text dataset, with text captions generated by BLIP from video frames.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.