Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.05638 v2 pith:EYAV5FS4 submitted 2022-05-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords few-shotpefttrainingattainingbettercalledcomputationalcosts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Few-shot in-context learning (ICL) enables pre-trained language models to perform a previously-unseen task without any gradient-based training by feeding a small number of training examples as part of the input. ICL incurs substantial computational, memory, and storage costs because it involves processing all of the training examples every time a prediction is made. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) (e.g. adapter modules, prompt tuning, sparse update methods, etc.) offers an alternative paradigm where a small set of parameters are trained to enable a model to perform the new task. In this paper, we rigorously compare few-shot ICL and PEFT and demonstrate that the latter offers better accuracy as well as dramatically lower computational costs. Along the way, we introduce a new PEFT method called (IA)$^3$ that scales activations by learned vectors, attaining stronger performance while only introducing a relatively tiny amount of new parameters. We also propose a simple recipe based on the T0 model called T-Few that can be applied to new tasks without task-specific tuning or modifications. We validate the effectiveness of T-Few on completely unseen tasks by applying it to the RAFT benchmark, attaining super-human performance for the first time and outperforming the state-of-the-art by 6% absolute. All of the code used in our experiments is publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Leveraging LLMs for Multi-File DSL Code Generation: An Industrial Case Study

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Fine-tuning 7B code LLMs on a custom multi-file DSL dataset achieves structural fidelity of 1.00, high exact-match accuracy, and practical utility validated by expert survey and execution checks.

  2. Parameter Efficiency Is Not Memory Efficiency: Rethinking Fine-Tuning for On-Device LLM Adaptation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LARS constrains activation subspaces to decouple memory use from sequence length, cutting GPU memory by 33.5% and CPU memory by 52% versus LoRA while keeping accuracy comparable.

  3. RapidUn: Influence-Driven Parameter Reweighting for Efficient Large Language Model Unlearning

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RapidUn uses influence estimation to drive adaptive parameter reweighting for efficient LLM unlearning, outperforming baselines with up to 100x efficiency gains on tested models.

  4. ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language models

    cs.CL 2023-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ART automatically generates multi-step reasoning programs with tool integration for LLMs, yielding substantial gains over few-shot and auto-CoT prompting on BigBench and MMLU while matching hand-crafted CoT on most tasks.

  5. BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model

    cs.CL 2022-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BLOOM is a 176B-parameter open-access multilingual language model trained on the ROOTS corpus that achieves competitive performance on benchmarks, with improved results after multitask prompted finetuning.

  6. An Initial Exploration of Contrastive Prompt Tuning to Generate Energy-Efficient Code

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Contrastive Prompt Tuning raises code accuracy on two of three tested models but produces inconsistent energy-efficiency gains that depend on model, language, and task.

  7. CoLLM: Continuous Adaptation for SLO-Aware LLM Serving on Shared GPU Clusters

    cs.DC 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CoLLM unifies FL PEFT and inference on shared edge replicas via intra-replica model sharing and two-timescale inter-replica coordination, achieving up to 3x higher goodput than prior LLM systems.

  8. Survey in Characterizing Semantic Change

    cs.CL 2024-02 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The survey organizes prior work on semantic change characterization into three classes, summarizes selected publications in a table, and discusses research needs and trends.

  9. The Hitchhiker's Guide to Agentic AI: From Foundations to Systems

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A comprehensive reference book organizing existing techniques for agentic AI systems across LLM substrate, reasoning, agent design patterns, inter-agent coordination, and production deployment.