Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can the Inference Logic of Large Language Models be Disentangled into Symbolic Concepts?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.01083 v1 pith:F7QRAIOD submitted 2023-04-03 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords conceptssymbolicinferencesparsednnsexplaininputlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we explain the inference logic of large language models (LLMs) as a set of symbolic concepts. Many recent studies have discovered that traditional DNNs usually encode sparse symbolic concepts. However, because an LLM has much more parameters than traditional DNNs, whether the LLM also encodes sparse symbolic concepts is still an open problem. Therefore, in this paper, we propose to disentangle the inference score of LLMs for dialogue tasks into a small number of symbolic concepts. We verify that we can use those sparse concepts to well estimate all inference scores of the LLM on all arbitrarily masking states of the input sentence. We also evaluate the transferability of concepts encoded by an LLM and verify that symbolic concepts usually exhibit high transferability across similar input sentences. More crucially, those symbolic concepts can be used to explain the exact reasons accountable for the LLM's prediction errors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models via Interactions

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    KD sparsifies complex interactions in student LLMs; a Complex Interaction Penalty that enforces this improves multiple KD methods on in- and out-of-domain benchmarks.

Pith tools