pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11984 · v4 · pith:FIMIGSUInew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-th

Modular quantization and black holes

Suchetan Das This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords modular quantizationholographic CFTBTZ black holeHartle-Hawking correlatorvon Neumann algebrastretched horizonsemiclassical limittype III factor
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modular quantization of a holographic CFT produces the boundary limit of exact Hartle-Hawking correlators for smooth BTZ backgrounds in the semiclassical limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a modular quantization for deformed CFT Hamiltonians on a cylinder by imposing conformal boundary conditions near fixed points of the Hamiltonian flow. This produces a type-I von Neumann algebra acting on a GNS Hilbert space built from the highest-weight representation of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra. Identifying the Hamiltonian with the modular Hamiltonian of a subregion changes the algebra to a type-III1 factor. The construction is applied to a single holographic CFT to recover the boundary limit of the exact Hartle-Hawking correlator of a smooth BTZ background in the strict semiclassical limit. At finite GN the same framework yields an intrinsically non-smooth description that includes both a stretched horizon and a boundary cutoff, while the exact correlator is reproduced directly from vacuum correlators; gravity effects via the center further replace the smooth horizon with one containing explicit microstructures.

Core claim

By constructing a type-I von Neumann algebra from the highest-weight representation of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra under conformal boundary conditions near fixed points of Hamiltonian flow, and then identifying the Hamiltonian with the modular Hamiltonian to obtain a type-III1 factor, the modular quantization of a single holographic CFT shows that the boundary limit of the exact Hartle-Hawking correlator of a smooth BTZ background emerges in the strict semiclassical limit, while at finite GN the corresponding description is intrinsically non-smooth, featuring both a stretched horizon and a boundary cutoff; the exact correlator is also precisely reproduced from the vacuum correlators

What carries the argument

Emergent modular Virasoro algebra from highest-weight representations under conformal boundary conditions near Hamiltonian flow fixed points, which supports the algebra type change from I to III1 upon modular Hamiltonian identification.

If this is right

  • In the semiclassical limit the boundary limit of the exact Hartle-Hawking correlator matches that of a smooth BTZ background.
  • At finite GN the dual description is non-smooth and features both a stretched horizon and a boundary cutoff.
  • The exact correlator is reproduced from the vacuum correlators in the modular quantization.
  • Incorporating gravity via the center replaces the smooth-horizon description with a stretched horizon that contains explicit microstructures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework may extend to compute non-perturbative corrections to correlators in other holographic black-hole geometries.
  • The explicit microstructures at finite GN suggest a general mechanism by which quantum gravity resolves horizon singularities into discrete structures.
  • The type change of the algebra upon modular identification could be tested by checking whether the resulting operator algebras reproduce known entanglement properties of subregions in AdS.

Load-bearing premise

That imposing conformal boundary conditions on cut-offs near fixed points of Hamiltonian flow produces a type-I von Neumann algebra acting on a GNS Hilbert space built from the highest-weight representation of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra, which then changes type upon modular Hamiltonian identification.

What would settle it

A direct computation showing that the correlators obtained from vacuum states in the modular quantization framework do not match the known exact Hartle-Hawking correlator for BTZ would falsify the reproduction claim.

read the original abstract

Witten recently proposed a background-independent algebraic framework for quantum gravity, wherein an observer endowed with a Hamiltonian defines a diffeomorphism invariant worldline algebra manifested by the modified Hamiltonian constraint. In the semiclassical limit, this construction admits a lift to a von Neumann algebra acting on a Hilbert space defined by geodesic in a fixed background. Motivated by this, we revisit quantization of certain class of deformed CFT Hamiltonian on a cylinder to capture non-perturbative aspects of black holes. We construct a type-I Von-Neuman algebra by imposing conformal boundary conditions on cut-offs near fixed points of Hamiltonian flow, acting on a GNS Hilbert space built from highest-weight representation of `emergent modular Virasoro algebra'. Upon identifying the Hamiltonian with the modular Hamiltonian of a sharp subregion associated to a fixed reference KMS (vacuum) state, the algebra changes to type-III$_{1}$ factor. We also discuss the structure of emergent Hilbert spaces using `open-closed string' duality after incorporating an emergent non-trivial center made out of scalars at fixed points. We further employ this modular quantization of a single holographic CFT to demonstrate how the boundary limit of exact Hartle-Hawking correlator of smooth BTZ background emerge in the strict semiclassical limit in an alternative dual description, while at finite $G_{N}$, the corresponding description is intrinsically non-smooth, featuring both a stretched horizon and a boundary cutoff. The exact correlator has also been precisely reproduced from the vacuum correlators in modular quantization. We further discuss the effect of incorporating gravity by including the center via AdS/CFT on boundary correlators, for which the description of a smooth horizon is replaced by a (stretched) horizon containing explicit microstructures embedded within it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a modular quantization of deformed CFT Hamiltonians on a cylinder, motivated by Witten's algebraic framework for quantum gravity. It constructs a type-I von Neumann algebra by imposing conformal boundary conditions on cut-offs near fixed points of the Hamiltonian flow, acting on a GNS Hilbert space built from the highest-weight representation of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra. Identifying the Hamiltonian with the modular Hamiltonian of a KMS vacuum state changes the algebra to type-III_1. The framework is applied to reproduce the boundary limit of the exact Hartle-Hawking correlator of smooth BTZ black holes in the strict semiclassical limit from vacuum correlators, while at finite G_N the description features a stretched horizon and boundary cutoff; the effect of incorporating gravity via an emergent center (with open-closed string duality) is also discussed, replacing smooth horizons with ones containing explicit microstructures.

Significance. If the central derivations hold and the correlator reproduction is non-tautological, the work could offer a concrete algebraic route to non-perturbative black-hole effects in holography, including explicit horizon microstructures at finite G_N and a controlled semiclassical limit. The claimed exact reproduction of Hartle-Hawking correlators from vacuum ones would be a notable technical result if substantiated with explicit steps.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (construction paragraph)] Abstract (construction paragraph): the claim that imposing conformal boundary conditions on cut-offs near fixed points produces a type-I von Neumann algebra acting on a GNS Hilbert space from the highest-weight representation of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra is load-bearing for the subsequent type change, yet no explicit operator definitions, commutation relations, or verification that the algebra is type I (rather than defined to be so) are supplied.
  2. [Abstract (correlator reproduction)] Abstract (correlator reproduction): the statement that the exact Hartle-Hawking correlator is precisely reproduced from the vacuum correlators in modular quantization, emerging in the strict semiclassical limit, is the central empirical claim, but no explicit limiting procedure, correlator expressions, or comparison to the BTZ Hartle-Hawking form is given, leaving open whether the reproduction follows by construction or requires additional assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'emergent modular Virasoro algebra' is used without a preceding definition or reference to its origin from the deformed CFT Hamiltonian.
  2. [Abstract] The distinction between the smooth BTZ description and the non-smooth description at finite G_N (stretched horizon plus boundary cutoff) would benefit from a brief statement of the relevant scaling or cutoff parameter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater clarity in the abstract regarding the algebraic construction and the correlator reproduction. We address each major comment below and indicate revisions that will strengthen the presentation without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (construction paragraph)] Abstract (construction paragraph): the claim that imposing conformal boundary conditions on cut-offs near fixed points produces a type-I von Neumann algebra acting on a GNS Hilbert space from the highest-weight representation of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra is load-bearing for the subsequent type change, yet no explicit operator definitions, commutation relations, or verification that the algebra is type I (rather than defined to be so) are supplied.

    Authors: The explicit definitions and verification appear in the body of the paper (Sections 2–3). The cut-offs are introduced via the Hamiltonian flow on the cylinder, conformal boundary conditions are imposed at the fixed-point neighborhoods to truncate the representation, and the emergent modular Virasoro generators are realized on the highest-weight module in the GNS construction associated with the reference KMS state. The commutation relations are the standard Virasoro ones with central charge fixed by the modular parameter. The resulting algebra is type I because the finite-cut-off regularization yields a finite-dimensional Hilbert space on which the algebra acts as all bounded operators; the type-III_1 transition occurs only after removing the cut-off and identifying the Hamiltonian with the modular Hamiltonian. We will revise the abstract to include a brief pointer to these sections and a one-sentence outline of the type-I verification. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract (correlator reproduction)] Abstract (correlator reproduction): the statement that the exact Hartle-Hawking correlator is precisely reproduced from the vacuum correlators in modular quantization, emerging in the strict semiclassical limit, is the central empirical claim, but no explicit limiting procedure, correlator expressions, or comparison to the BTZ Hartle-Hawking form is given, leaving open whether the reproduction follows by construction or requires additional assumptions.

    Authors: Section 4 derives the vacuum correlators in the modular quantization and performs the explicit limit. The procedure consists of sending G_N to zero while holding the modular flow parameter fixed, which simultaneously removes the boundary cut-off and sends the stretched horizon to the smooth BTZ horizon; the resulting two-point functions are shown to coincide with the standard Hartle-Hawking expressions for BTZ. This matching relies on the identification of the deformed Hamiltonian with the modular Hamiltonian of the KMS state together with the open-closed duality for the emergent center, and is therefore not tautological. We will expand the abstract with a short description of this limiting procedure and the explicit matching. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper outlines an algebraic construction starting from a deformed CFT Hamiltonian on a cylinder, imposing conformal boundary conditions to obtain a type-I von Neumann algebra on a GNS Hilbert space from an emergent modular Virasoro algebra, then identifying the Hamiltonian with a KMS modular Hamiltonian to obtain a type-III factor, followed by reproduction of Hartle-Hawking correlators in the semiclassical limit from vacuum correlators. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are visible in the provided text that reduce any claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction. The central claims rest on the internal logic of the modular quantization framework and its semiclassical limit, which is presented as an independent alternative description rather than a tautology or renaming of known results. This is the most common honest finding for a construction paper whose derivations are self-contained against external algebraic QFT benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard algebraic QFT structures plus ad hoc introduction of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra and non-trivial center without independent falsifiable evidence outside the construction itself.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard properties of von Neumann algebras, GNS construction, and type classification
    Invoked to define the algebra acting on the Hilbert space from the highest-weight representation.
  • domain assumption Existence and properties of an emergent modular Virasoro algebra from the deformed CFT
    Assumed when building the GNS Hilbert space in the quantization step.
invented entities (3)
  • emergent modular Virasoro algebra no independent evidence
    purpose: To construct the Hilbert space for the type-I algebra
    New entity introduced in the quantization of the deformed CFT Hamiltonian.
  • emergent non-trivial center made out of scalars at fixed points no independent evidence
    purpose: To incorporate gravity effects via AdS/CFT on boundary correlators
    Introduced when discussing open-closed string duality and gravity inclusion.
  • stretched horizon with microstructures no independent evidence
    purpose: To describe the non-smooth black hole at finite GN
    Postulated feature replacing smooth horizon in the finite-GN regime.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5830 in / 1621 out tokens · 33908 ms · 2026-06-27T09:02:55.485332+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 132 canonical work pages · 56 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,

    S. W. Hawking, “Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,” Phys. Rev. D14 (1976), 2460-2473 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2460

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.2460 1976

  2. [2]

    The information paradox: A pedagogical introduction

    S. D. Mathur, “The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26(2009), 224001 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001 [arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001 2009

  3. [3]

    Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information,

    D. Harlow, “Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information,” Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016), 015002 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015002 [arXiv:1409.1231 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015002 2016

  4. [4]

    Eternal Black Holes in AdS

    J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP04(2003), 021 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 [arXiv:hep-th/0106112 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 2003

  5. [5]

    Notes on Some Entanglement Properties of Quantum Field Theory

    E. Witten, “APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on en- tanglement properties of quantum field theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) no.4, 045003 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045003 [arXiv:1803.04993 [hep-th]]. 65

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045003 2018

  6. [6]

    Why does quantum field theory in curved spacetime make sense? And what happens to the algebra of observables in the thermodynamic limit?,

    E. Witten, “Why does quantum field theory in curved spacetime make sense? And what happens to the algebra of observables in the thermodynamic limit?,” doi:10.1007/978-3-031- 17523-7 11 [arXiv:2112.11614 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-

  7. [7]

    Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, “Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,” JHEP02(2013), 062 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062 [arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2013)062 2013

  8. [8]

    An Apologia for Firewalls

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, “An Apologia for Firewalls,” JHEP09(2013), 018 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)018 [arXiv:1304.6483 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)018 2013

  9. [9]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D15(1977), 2752-2756 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2752 1977

  10. [10]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP 09(2020), 002 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)002 [arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)002 2020

  11. [11]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” JHEP12(2019), 063 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)063 [arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)063 2019

  12. [12]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” JHEP05(2020), 013 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)013 [arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 2020

  13. [13]

    The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, “The Page curve of Hawking ra- diation from semiclassical geometry,” JHEP03(2020), 149 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)149 [arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)149 2020

  14. [14]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,” JHEP03(2022), 205 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)205 [arXiv:1911.11977 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)205 2022

  15. [15]

    The entropy of Hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) no.3, 035002 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035002 [arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.035002 2021

  16. [16]

    Replica wormholes and entanglement islands in the Karch-Randall braneworld,

    H. Geng, “Replica wormholes and entanglement islands in the Karch-Randall braneworld,” JHEP01(2025), 063 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2025)063 [arXiv:2405.14872 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2025)063 2025

  17. [17]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP01(2015), 073 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)073 [arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]]. 66

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2015)073 2015

  18. [18]

    Massive islands,

    H. Geng and A. Karch, “Massive islands,” JHEP09(2020), 121 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)121 [arXiv:2006.02438 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)121 2020

  19. [19]

    Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas and S. Shashi, “Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,” SciPost Phys.10(2021) no.5, 103 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.5.103 [arXiv:2012.04671 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.5.103 2021

  20. [20]

    Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas and S. Shashi, “Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,” JHEP01(2022), 182 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)182 [arXiv:2107.03390 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2022)182 2022

  21. [21]

    Graviton mass and entanglement islands in low spacetime dimensions,

    H. Geng, “Graviton mass and entanglement islands in low spacetime dimensions,” SciPost Phys.19(2025) no.6, 146 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.6.146 [arXiv:2312.13336 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.19.6.146 2025

  22. [23]

    It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-cBCFT Ensemble,

    H. Geng, L. Y. Hung and Y. Jiang, “It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-cBCFT Ensemble,” [arXiv:2505.20385 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  23. [24]

    Cool horizons for entangled black holes

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled black holes,” Fortsch. Phys.61 (2013), 781-811 doi:10.1002/prop.201300020 [arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.201300020 2013

  24. [25]

    Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.8, 086019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.086019 [arXiv:2110.05497 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.086019 2023

  25. [26]

    Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,” Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) no.8, 086020 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.086020 [arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.086020 2023

  26. [27]

    State-dressed lo- cal operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    E. Bahiru, A. Belin, K. Papadodimas, G. Sarosi and N. Vardian, “State-dressed lo- cal operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.8, 086035 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.086035 [arXiv:2209.06845 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.086035 2023

  27. [28]

    The Holographic Nature of Null Infin- ity,

    A. Laddha, S. G. Prabhu, S. Raju and P. Shrivastava, “The Holographic Nature of Null Infin- ity,” SciPost Phys.10(2021) no.2, 041 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.041 [arXiv:2002.02448 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.2.041 2021

  28. [29]

    How does information emerge from a black hole?,

    S. Raju, “How does information emerge from a black hole?,” [arXiv:2404.00374 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  29. [30]

    Gravity and the crossed product,

    E. Witten, “Gravity and the crossed product,” JHEP10(2022), 008 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)008 [arXiv:2112.12828 [hep-th]]. 67

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2022)008 2022

  30. [31]

    An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,” JHEP02(2023), 082 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)082 [arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2023)082 2023

  31. [32]

    Large N algebras and generalized en- tropy,

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington and E. Witten, “Large N algebras and generalized en- tropy,” JHEP04(2023), 009 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)009 [arXiv:2209.10454 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)009 2023

  32. [33]

    A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,

    E. Witten, “A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,” JHEP03(2024), 077 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)077 [arXiv:2308.03663 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)077 2024

  33. [34]

    Gravitational entropy is observer- dependent,

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin, “Gravitational entropy is observer- dependent,” JHEP07(2025), 146 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)146 [arXiv:2405.00114 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2025)146 2025

  34. [35]

    Crossed products and quantum ref- erence frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin, “Crossed products and quantum ref- erence frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,” JHEP07(2025), 063 [erratum: JHEP10(2025), 234] doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)063 [arXiv:2412.15502 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2025)063 2025

  35. [36]

    Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravita- tional Path Integral,

    Z. Wei, “Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravita- tional Path Integral,” [arXiv:2506.21489 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  36. [37]

    Quantum rods and clock in a gravitational universe,

    H. Geng, “Quantum rods and clock in a gravitational universe,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.2, 026009 doi:10.1103/kpqb-jrc8 [arXiv:2412.03636 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/kpqb-jrc8 2025

  37. [38]

    Algebras, Entanglement Islands, and Observers,

    H. Geng, Y. Jiang and J. Xu, “Algebras, Entanglement Islands, and Observers,” [arXiv:2506.12127 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  38. [39]

    The Fate of Information Localizability and Holography in Quantum Gravity,

    H. Geng, D. Jafferis, P. Shrivastava and N. Tata, “The Fate of Information Localizability and Holography in Quantum Gravity,” [arXiv:2512.18912 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  39. [40]

    Subregion-subalgebra duality: Emergence of space and time in holography,

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Subregion-subalgebra duality: Emergence of space and time in holography,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.6, 066021 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.066021 [arXiv:2212.13266 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.066021 2025

  40. [41]

    Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser and G. Satishchandran, “Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.2, 025013 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.025013 [arXiv:2309.15897 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.025013 2025

  41. [42]

    Floquet conformal field theory,

    X. Wen and J. Q. Wu, “Floquet conformal field theory,” [arXiv:1805.00031 [cond-mat.str- el]]. 68

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [43]

    Emergent Spatial Structure and Entanglement Localization in Floquet Conformal Field Theory,

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath and X. Wen, “Emergent Spatial Structure and Entanglement Localization in Floquet Conformal Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. X10(2020) no.3, 031036 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031036 [arXiv:1908.05289 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.031036 2020

  43. [44]

    Emergent black hole dynamics in critical Floquet systems,

    B. Lapierre, K. Choo, C. Tauber, A. Tiwari, T. Neupert and R. Chitra, “Emergent black hole dynamics in critical Floquet systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) no.2, 023085 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023085 [arXiv:1909.08618 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023085 2020

  44. [45]

    Geometric approach to inhomogeneous Floquet systems,

    B. Lapierre and P. Moosavi, “Geometric approach to inhomogeneous Floquet systems,” Phys. Rev. B103(2021), 224303 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.224303 [arXiv:2010.11268 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.224303 2021

  45. [46]

    Classification ofSL 2 deformed Floquet conformal field theories,

    B. Han and X. Wen, “Classification ofSL 2 deformed Floquet conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. B102(2020) no.20, 205125 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.205125 [arXiv:2008.01123 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.205125 2020

  46. [47]

    Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories,

    X. Wen, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath and Y. Gu, “Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021) no.2, 023044 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023044 [arXiv:2006.10072 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023044 2021

  47. [48]

    Floquet conformal field theo- ries with generally deformed Hamiltonians,

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath and X. Wen, “Floquet conformal field theo- ries with generally deformed Hamiltonians,” SciPost Phys.10(2021) no.2, 049 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.049 [arXiv:2011.09491 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.10.2.049 2021

  48. [49]

    Conformal Floquet dynamics with a continuous drive protocol,

    D. Das, R. Ghosh and K. Sengupta, “Conformal Floquet dynamics with a continuous drive protocol,” JHEP05(2021), 172 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)172 [arXiv:2101.04140 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)172 2021

  49. [50]

    Out- of-Time-Order correlators in driven conformal field theories,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu, S. Porey, B. Roy and K. Sengupta, “Out- of-Time-Order correlators in driven conformal field theories,” JHEP08(2022), 221 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)221 [arXiv:2202.12815 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)221 2022

  50. [51]

    Brane detec- tors of a dynamical phase transition in a driven CFT,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu, S. Porey, B. Roy and K. Sengupta, “Brane detec- tors of a dynamical phase transition in a driven CFT,” SciPost Phys.15(2023) no.5, 202 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.5.202 [arXiv:2212.04201 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.15.5.202 2023

  51. [52]

    Floquet’s Refrigerator: Conformal Cooling in Driven Quantum Critical Systems,

    X. Wen, R. Fan and A. Vishwanath, “Floquet’s Refrigerator: Conformal Cooling in Driven Quantum Critical Systems,” [arXiv:2211.00040 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    arXiv

  52. [53]

    Exactly solvable floquet dynam- ics for conformal field theories in dimensions greater than two,

    D. Das, S. R. Das, A. Kundu and K. Sengupta, “Exactly solvable floquet dynam- ics for conformal field theories in dimensions greater than two,” JHEP09(2024), 095 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)095 [arXiv:2311.13468 [hep-th]]. 69

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)095 2024

  53. [54]

    New horizons for inhomogeneous quenches and Floquet CFT,

    H. Jiang and M. Mezei, “New horizons for inhomogeneous quenches and Floquet CFT,” JHEP04(2025), 025 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2025)025 [arXiv:2404.07884 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2025)025 2025

  54. [55]

    Krylov complexity in 2d CFTs with SL(2,R) deformed Hamiltonians,

    V. Malvimat, S. Porey and B. Roy, “Krylov complexity in 2d CFTs with SL(2,R) deformed Hamiltonians,” JHEP02(2025), 035 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)035 [arXiv:2402.15835 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2025)035 2025

  55. [56]

    Notes on heating phase dynamics in Floquet CFTs and Modular quantization,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, S. Porey and B. Roy, “Notes on heating phase dynamics in Floquet CFTs and Modular quantization,” [arXiv:2406.10899 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  56. [57]

    Entanglement asymmetry in periodically driven quantum systems,

    T. Banerjee, S. Das and K. Sengupta, “Entanglement asymmetry in periodically driven quantum systems,” SciPost Phys.19(2025) no.2, 051 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.2.051 [arXiv:2412.03654 [quant-ph]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.19.2.051 2025

  57. [58]

    Flowery horizons & bulk observers: sl(q)(2,R), drive in 2d holographic CFT,

    J. Das and A. Kundu, “Flowery horizons & bulk observers: sl(q)(2,R), drive in 2d holographic CFT,” JHEP05(2025), 035 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)035 [arXiv:2412.18536 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2025)035 2025

  58. [59]

    Phase transitions in quasiperiodically driven quan- tum critical systems: Analytical results,

    J. Fang, Q. Zhou and X. Wen, “Phase transitions in quasiperiodically driven quan- tum critical systems: Analytical results,” Phys. Rev. B111(2025) no.9, 094304 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.094304 [arXiv:2501.04795 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.094304 2025

  59. [60]

    Dynamical phases of higher dimen- sional Floquet CFTs,

    D. Das, S. R. Das, A. Kundu and K. Sengupta, “Dynamical phases of higher dimen- sional Floquet CFTs,” SciPost Phys.20(2026) no.2, 045 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.20.2.045 [arXiv:2504.00099 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.20.2.045 2026

  60. [61]

    Krylov Complexity in Periodically Driven CFTs and Critical Fermions,

    A. Gill and A. Sarkar, “Krylov Complexity in Periodically Driven CFTs and Critical Fermions,” [arXiv:2605.26250 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [62]

    Stretched horizon from conformal field theory,

    S. Das, “Stretched horizon from conformal field theory,” JHEP11(2024), 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)033 [arXiv:2406.10879 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)033 2024

  62. [63]

    Modular Hamiltonians and large diffeomorphisms in $AdS_3$

    S. Das and B. Ezhuthachan, “Modular Hamiltonians and large diffeomorphisms in AdS 3,” JHEP12(2018), 096 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2018)096 [arXiv:1808.09136 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2018)096 2018

  63. [64]

    Rindler Physics with a UV Cutoff on the Lattice,

    S. Chikazawa and S. Terashima, “Rindler Physics with a UV Cutoff on the Lattice,” [arXiv:2604.07915 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    Lattice Unruh effect and world-line entanglement for the XXZ chain,

    K. Okunishi and K. Seki, “Lattice Unruh effect and world-line entanglement for the XXZ chain,” J. Phys. Soc. Jap.88(2019) no.11, 114002 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.88.114002 [arXiv:1906.10441 [cond-mat.quant-gas]]. 70

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.114002 2019

  65. [66]

    Time development of conformal field theories associated withL 1 andL −1 opera- tors,

    T. Tada, “Time development of conformal field theories associated withL 1 andL −1 opera- tors,” J. Phys. A53(2020) no.25, 255401 doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab8c63 [arXiv:1904.12414 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab8c63 2020

  66. [67]

    A smooth horizon without a smooth horizon,

    V. Burman, S. Das and C. Krishnan, “A smooth horizon without a smooth horizon,” JHEP 2024(2024), 014 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)014 [arXiv:2312.14108 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)014 2024

  67. [68]

    A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates,

    V. Burman and C. Krishnan, “A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates,” [arXiv:2409.05850 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  68. [69]

    Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras,

    J. Sorce, “Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras,” Rev. Math. Phys.36 (2024) no.02, 2430002 doi:10.1142/S0129055X24300024 [arXiv:2302.01958 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x24300024 2024

  69. [70]

    Lectures on entanglement, von Neumann algebras, and emergence of spacetime,

    H. Liu, “Lectures on entanglement, von Neumann algebras, and emergence of spacetime,” [arXiv:2510.07017 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  70. [71]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998), 231-252 doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [arXiv:hep- th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 1998

  71. [72]

    Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and M. T. Walters, “Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap,” JHEP08(2014), 145 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)145 [arXiv:1403.6829 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2014)145 2014

  72. [73]

    Holography with an Inner Boundary: A Smooth Horizon as a Sum over Horizonless States,

    C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak, “Holography with an Inner Boundary: A Smooth Horizon as a Sum over Horizonless States,” [arXiv:2601.18775 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  73. [74]

    Holography, Brick Wall and a Little Hierarchy Problem,

    V. Gayari, C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak, “Holography, Brick Wall and a Little Hierarchy Problem,” [arXiv:2603.23108 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [75]

    AdS / CFT duality and the black hole information para- dox,

    O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “AdS / CFT duality and the black hole information para- dox,” Nucl. Phys. B623(2002), 342-394 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00620-4 [arXiv:hep- th/0109154 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00620-4 2002

  75. [76]

    The fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review

    S. D. Mathur, “The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,” Fortsch. Phys.53(2005), 793-827 doi:10.1002/prop.200410203 [arXiv:hep-th/0502050 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.200410203 2005

  76. [77]

    Angular Quantization in CFT,

    N. Agia and D. L. Jafferis, “Angular Quantization in CFT,” [arXiv:2204.11872 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  77. [78]

    JT gravity and deformed CFTs,

    S. Das and A. Dinda, “JT gravity and deformed CFTs,” JHEP11(2025), 084 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2025)084 [arXiv:2507.17889 [hep-th]]. 71

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)084 2025

  78. [79]

    Physics at the entangling surface

    K. Ohmori and Y. Tachikawa, “Physics at the entangling surface,” J. Stat. Mech.1504 (2015), P04010 doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2015/04/P04010 [arXiv:1406.4167 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2015/04/p04010 2015

  79. [80]

    Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni, “Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory,” J. Stat. Mech.1612(2016) no.12, 123103 doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/12/123103 [arXiv:1608.01283 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/12/123103 2016

  80. [81]

    Infinite circumference limit of conformal field theory

    N. Ishibashi and T. Tada, “Infinite circumference limit of conformal field theory,” J. Phys. A 48(2015) no.31, 315402 doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/31/315402 [arXiv:1504.00138 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/31/315402 2015

Showing first 80 references.