Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

How to Bridge the Gap between Modalities: Survey on Multimodal Large Language Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.07594 v3 pith:G5ZECB57 submitted 2023-11-10 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.MM

How to Bridge the Gap between Modalities: Survey on Multimodal Large Language Model

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.MM
keywords datallmsmultimodalalignmentmllmsmodalitymethodscapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We explore Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which integrate LLMs like GPT-4 to handle multimodal data, including text, images, audio, and more. MLLMs demonstrate capabilities such as generating image captions and answering image-based questions, bridging the gap towards real-world human-computer interactions and hinting at a potential pathway to artificial general intelligence. However, MLLMs still face challenges in addressing the semantic gap in multimodal data, which may lead to erroneous outputs, posing potential risks to society. Selecting the appropriate modality alignment method is crucial, as improper methods might require more parameters without significant performance improvements. This paper aims to explore modality alignment methods for LLMs and their current capabilities. Implementing effective modality alignment can help LLMs address environmental issues and enhance accessibility. The study surveys existing modality alignment methods for MLLMs, categorizing them into four groups: (1) Multimodal Converter, which transforms data into a format that LLMs can understand; (2) Multimodal Perceiver, which improves how LLMs percieve different types of data; (3) Tool Learning, which leverages external tools to convert data into a common format, usually text; and (4) Data-Driven Method, which teaches LLMs to understand specific data types within datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection

    cs.CL 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ErrorRadar is a new benchmark of 2,500 multimodal K-12 math problems for MLLM error step identification and categorization, where GPT-4o trails human experts by ~10%.

  2. Symbolic and Abstractive Reasoning with Complex Visual Queries

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces CVQ as a novel data type with a scalable synthesis pipeline from multi-modal KGs yielding 14 FOL-based query types, plus a two-stage training framework for MLLM visual reasoning.

  3. Structured and Abstractive Reasoning on Multi-modal Relational Knowledge Images

    cs.CV 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Authors build a synthetic data generator and two-stage training pipeline for structured abstractive reasoning on multi-modal relational knowledge images, releasing STAR-64K and showing 3B/7B models outperforming GPT-4o.

  4. A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents

    cs.AI 2024-04 accept novelty 3.0

    A systematic review of memory designs, evaluation methods, applications, limitations, and future directions for LLM-based agents.