Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

The paper proposes that the genuine multipartite entanglement of a gapped ground state—organized by a graph-encoded triangulation—converges to the partition function of the low-energy TQFT on any manifold, and proves this for string-net mod

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 22:25 UTC pith:GCJLCLXC

load-bearing objection A serious, technically rich paper that verifies a new entanglement-to-TQFT conjecture for all Levin-Wen models, but leaves a load-bearing UV cancellation unproved in general. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.16770 v2 pith:GCJLCLXC submitted 2026-02-18 hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MPmath.QAquant-ph

From Multipartite Entanglement to TQFT

Michele Del Zotto , Abhijit Gadde , Pavel Putrov This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MPmath.QAquant-ph
keywords multipartite entanglementmulti-invariantstopological quantum field theorygraph-encoded manifoldsstring-net modelsstate-sum partition functionsmodular tensor categoryground-state entanglement signal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

At long distances a gapped phase of matter is described by a topological quantum field theory (TQFT). The paper conjectures a tight relationship: the genuine (d+1)-partite entanglement of the ground state, extracted by a signal built from a graph-encoded triangulation of a d-manifold M, equals the TQFT partition function on M divided by a known power of the sphere partition function, in the large-region limit. If true in d=3, a single ground-state wavefunction determines the modular tensor category of the low-energy theory—the complete anyon data. The paper proves this for string-net lattice models, with errors exponentially small in the region size, and argues that the resulting partition-function knowledge is enough to reconstruct the full TQFT through the universal construction.

Core claim

The paper's central claim, Conjecture (1.1), is that for the ground state of a (d−1)+1-dimensional gapped Hamiltonian, split into d+1 regions shaped like faces of a d-simplex, the genuine (d+1)-partite signal from a graph-encoded manifold (a bipartite triangulation of M) equals Z(M)/Z(S^d)^{n_{S,Δ}} in the large-region limit. The paper proves this for all string-net models in d=3 with error O(e^{−cL}), where c is fixed by the input fusion category. The proof evaluates the multi-invariant on the string-net ground state, identifies ultraviolet factors as powers of D^{(n)}=Σ d_ℓ^{n+1} weighted by loop lengths, and shows that the 16-term genuine-signal combination cancels them, leaving the state

What carries the argument

The central object is the graph-encoded manifold (GEM): a bipartite, edge-colored graph obtained by mapping each d-simplex of a bipartite triangulation to a vertex and each shared face to a colored edge. A GEM defines a multi-invariant, a polynomial in the wavefunction coefficients and their conjugates that is invariant under local unitary transformations and multiplicative under tensor products. The signal of genuine (d+1)-partite entanglement is a linear combination of logarithms of multi-invariants with coefficients summing to zero in each party, which removes everything that factorizes across a bi-partition. The proof expresses the multi-invariant for a string-net ground state as a state

Load-bearing premise

The extraction step assumes that the ultraviolet factors (4.14) cancel exactly in the 16-term signal for every graph-encoded manifold satisfying the planar three-subgraph condition; the general case rests on a fictitious-bipartite-state interpretation, with an explicit algebraic demonstration written only for L(3,1).

What would settle it

Take the minimal GEM for the 3-torus (Figure 16 of the paper) and evaluate the 16-term signal (C.1) by the same symbolic loop-counting used for L(3,1). If any D^{(n)}-dependent term survives, the extracted value is not Z(T^3)/Z(S^3)^n, disproving the conjecture as stated; if all cancel, the verification extends to a second, non-trivial 3-manifold.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The partition function of the low-energy TQFT on any closed 3-manifold becomes a function of the ground-state wavefunction alone.
  • A single ground state of a 2+1 gapped system determines, in principle, the modular tensor category describing its line operators: anyon types, fusion rules, and braiding data.
  • For string-net models the extraction is proven with quantitative control: the error is exponentially small in the region size, with the rate set by the quantum-dimension data of the input fusion category.
  • Bipartite probes such as Rényi entropies see only the sphere partition function, so the full topological data requires the genuine four-partite signal.
  • The conjecture offers a wavefunction-only definition of a topological phase that does not presuppose a Hamiltonian or its locality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One concrete and inexpensive check is to run the Appendix C bookkeeping on the minimal GEMs for S^2×S^1, the 3-torus, and the binary icosahedral homology sphere listed in Appendix D; exact cancellation there would strengthen the empirical case for a general algebraic proof.
  • If the cancellation of ultraviolet factors can be turned into a combinatorial identity for all GEMs satisfying the planar three-subgraph condition, the conjecture would follow for every TQFT with a string-net/state-sum realization, not just the explicitly checked examples.
  • The paper's logic suggests that splitting the spatial manifold into more than d+1 regions, or using non-geometric multi-invariants, should expose extended TQFT data—boundary conditions, defects, and higher-codimension operators—rather than just partition functions on closed manifolds.
  • For chiral phases, an analogous statement would imply that multipartite entanglement in fractional quantum Hall wavefunctions encodes chiral central charge and modular data, connecting the conjecture to edge-mode physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a conjecture (Eq. 1.1) relating the genuine (d+1)-partite entanglement signal of the ground state of a gapped (d-1)+1-dimensional Hamiltonian to the partition function of the low-energy TQFT on a d-manifold M, with exponentially small corrections (Eq. 1.2). For d=3 it claims that this data can determine the MTC description of the low-energy TQFT. The main technical content is the claimed verification for all (2+1)-dimensional Levin-Wen string-net models. Section 4 identifies the string-net ground state with the Turaev-Viro state on a subdivided tetrahedron (Eq. 4.2), computes a general 4-partite multi-invariant for a GEM Gamma of a 3-manifold M, and obtains Z_TV(M) multiplied by an explicit UV factor plus exponentially small corrections (Eqs. 4.8, 4.10). A 16-term signal (Eq. 4.15) is then introduced to remove the UV factor; the cancellation is explicitly demonstrated only for one GEM realizing L(3,1) in Appendix C. Appendix A proves the key Perron-Frobenius asymptotic (4.6), and Appendix B offers an alternative extraction method using normalized multi-invariants.

Significance. If the proof were complete, this would be a substantial contribution: it would give a concrete, state-dependent bridge between multipartite entanglement measures and TQFT partition functions, and would go well beyond earlier partial results. The derivation up to Eq. (4.10) is explicit and technically solid, the asymptotic (4.6) is proved with an explicit gap in the MTC case (Appendix A), and the detailed L(3,1) cancellation in Appendix C is a genuine check. The construction of lower-partite fictitious states, however, is not a proof, and the manuscript itself presents only a single example of the UV cancellation. Since the claimed verification for general Levin-Wen models rests on this step, the paper's central result is currently conditional on an unproven combinatorial lemma. The paper is well organized, with useful examples and a clear separation of conjecture, proof, and future directions, but the load-bearing gap in Section 4.2 must be resolved before the main claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (4.15)] The cancellation of the UV factor (4.14) in the 16-term signal is asserted but not proved in general. The text interprets (4.14) as arising from fictitious bipartite/single-partite states and then states that all lower-partite multi-invariants of the family cancel it, but the only explicit verification is the L(3,1) GEM in Appendix C. If some GEM satisfying the planar-3-subgraph condition left a residual UV factor, the exponential result (1.2) would fail with an O(1) contamination. Since Eq. (1.2) is the paper's main verification claim for general Levin-Wen models, this is a load-bearing gap and not a presentation issue.
  2. [Section 4.2, paragraph after Eq. (4.14)] The statement that a lower-partite member of the same family must also be a GEM but for a disjoint union of copies of S3 is not justified. Deleting or merging edge colors in a 4-colored GEM does not automatically preserve the GEM conditions, and the topological meaning of the resulting lower-partite graph is not analyzed. A general proof, or at least a precise citation to a theorem in the crystallization literature, is needed. This assertion is essential to the cancellation mechanism in (4.15).
  3. [Appendix B] The alternative extraction method is presented as a general route, but the required properties of the auxiliary graphs Gamma_lambda — that each realizes S3 and that the matrix \hat N in (B.13) is invertible for every truncation — are imposed rather than proved. The explicit solution (B.15)-(B.17) can presumably be checked by substitution using (B.4) and (B.3), but the paper should state this verification. If Appendix B is intended to supply the missing general proof, that should be stated explicitly and the proof completed; otherwise the reader is left with two incomplete routes to (1.2).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.8)] Typo: 'Verices' should be 'Vertices'.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eqs. (4.11)-(4.14)] The quantities l_{a,b} and l^{r(alpha)} are described verbally but not defined precisely; a short formal definition would help the reader check the UV-factor rearrangements.
  3. [Appendix C] The 16 graphs in Figure 14 are not explained in the text; a sentence describing their ordering and how the coefficient matrices in (C.2)-(C.19) are read off from the graphs would make the check reproducible.
  4. [Section 3.1, last paragraph] The claim that the MTC can be recovered from the partition functions on closed manifolds is presented as a sketch. The steps involving the universal construction, the special basis on H(T^2), and the treatment of autoequivalences are not fully rigorous. This is a reasonable outline, but the paper should mark it more explicitly as heuristic rather than a theorem.
  5. [Notation] The notation n_{S,Delta} versus n_{S,Delta} and the use of D^{(1)} versus D^2 are sometimes inconsistent; a short notation table would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the TQFT partition function is computed independently from the input fusion category; only a minor same-author citation for the signal scheme is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained against an externally defined target. The left-hand side of Conjecture (1.1) is a polynomial/LU-invariant of the Levin-Wen ground state; the right-hand side is the Turaev-Viro partition function computed independently from the same spherical fusion category via the state sum (3.8). There is no parameter fitting: the signal (4.15) is explicitly constructed from the multi-invariant framework, and the UV factor (4.14) is derived from the state-sum calculation (4.10), not imposed to match the TQFT answer. The asymptotic (4.6) is justified in Appendix A by the Perron-Frobenius theorem / Verlinde formula, independent of the target partition function. The one self-citation that could be questioned is [25], the unpublished companion paper by one author defining the general signal scheme, but the explicit signal used in the verification is written out in the present paper, so the citation is not load-bearing to the core result. The main genuine weakness is a rigor gap, not circularity: the claim in Section 4.2 that every lower-partite multi-invariant of a GEM is a GEM for a disjoint union of S^3 is asserted without a general proof, and only the L(3,1) example in Appendix C demonstrates the UV cancellation explicitly. An incomplete proof of cancellation is not a reduction of the conclusion to the input; it is an open technical step. Therefore the paper shows no significant circularity and receives a low score reflecting only the minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the only invented objects are the fictitious boundary states used to justify the UV cancellation.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Gapped phases at long distances are described by unitary TQFTs.
    Used to define the right-hand side of (1.1) and to invoke the universal construction (Section 1, footnote 3).
  • standard math Every PL manifold admits a bipartite triangulation and is represented by a GEM; the GEM condition (all 3-colored subgraphs planar for d=3) characterizes 3-manifolds.
    Basis for associating a multi-invariant graph to a manifold (Section 2.3, citing [26–35]).
  • domain assumption The Levin-Wen ground state on the 2-sphere is the Turaev-Viro state sum on a ball with fixed boundary labels (Eq. (4.1), following [37,44]).
    Identifies the UV ground state with the IR TQFT state; the subsequent computation is performed at the level of this state.
  • standard math For a unitary spherical fusion category, the fusion matrix M has Perron-Frobenius properties giving the asymptotic (4.6) with exponentially small corrections.
    Derived in Appendix A via Perron-Frobenius; requires unitarity and positivity of fusion coefficients.
  • ad hoc to paper The UV contribution (4.14) can be formally written as arising from fictitious bipartite states localized on boundaries, so a genuine 4-partite signal cancels it.
    This is the crucial cancellation step in Section 4.2; the states need not exist, and the general cancellation is asserted rather than proven for every GEM.
invented entities (1)
  • Fictitious bipartite states localized at region boundaries no independent evidence
    purpose: Bookkeeping device to interpret the UV factor (4.14) and justify that the 4-partite signal cancels it.
    The text says these states 'may not exist' (Section 4.2); they are not physical and have no falsifiable consequence.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 26363 in / 15729 out tokens · 130358 ms · 2026-08-02T22:25:22.366437+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

At long distances, a gapped phase of matter is described by a topological quantum field theory (TQFT). We conjecture a tight and concrete relationship between the genuine $(d+1)$-partite entanglement -- labelled by a $d$-dimensional manifold $M$ -- in the ground state of a $(d-1)+1$-dimensional gapped theory and the partition function of the low energy TQFT on $M$. Under certain assumptions, the conjecture implies that for $d=3$, the ground state wavefunction can determine the modular tensor category description of the low energy TQFT. We verify our conjecture for general (2+1)-dimensional Levin-Wen string-net models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16770 by Abhijit Gadde, Michele Del Zotto, Pavel Putrov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Here we have graphically represented the equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Graphical presentation of ψ and ψ¯ coefficients. 1 2 3 1 2 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A sample 3-partite multi-invariant with n = 3. Here we have introduced a new argument for Z that is the permutation tuple used to define it. Note, however, that labeling of multi-invariants by a permutation tuple is ambiguous. This is because the labeling of bra replicas or ket replicas can be changed arbitrarily. We get Z(σ1, . . . , σq; ·) = Z(g · σ1, . . . , g · σq; ·) = Z(σ1 · h, . . . , σq · h; ·), g,… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (b)). The monoidal identity 1 is the simple object corresponding to a trivial line operator. There is also a duality operation ( )∗ : C → C that corresponds to reversing the orientation of the line operators. There are distinguished evaluation o ∗ ⊗ o → 1 and coevaluation and 1 → o ⊗ o ∗ realized by “folding” the line operator o (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) The dual graph G for a tetrahedron show in red. The edges are decorated by simple objects ℓi ∈ Irr(C) and vertices by the morphisms from HomC(ℓi ⊗ℓj , ℓk) or HomC(ℓk, ℓi⊗ℓj ). (b) The graph G embedded in a plane. Read from bottom to top, it provides a composition of the morphisms of the form shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two polyhedra in a polytope decomposition of a 3-manifold with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The graph ΓS3 . Zˆ(Γ; |ψ⟩) ≡ Z(Γ; |ψ⟩) Z(ΓS3 ; |ψ⟩) N0(Γ)/2 (B.2) where N0(Γ) is the number of vertices of Γ. The quantities N0(Γ), N2:e,n(Γ), N3(Γ) obey a universal linear relation due to the fact that the Euler characteristic of any 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The hypercube graph Γ 0 . (a) n = 2 (b) n = 3 (c) n = 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The sequence of graphs Γ (e,n) , n = 2, 3, 4, . . . for e corresponding to the •• pair of colors. where e ∗ denotes the dual edge, i.e. the edge corresponding to the pair of colors complementary to the one for e. Note that for any given Γ only a finite number of Aµ(Γ) are non-zero. Moreover, using the relations (B.4) and the total number of bi-colored loops N2(Γ) := P e,n N2:e,n(Γ) we can rewrite the expr… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The multi-invariants corresponding to the 16 terms in the decomposition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The minimal GEM realizing M = S 2 × S 1 . For any simple TQFT (that is, with the unique vacuum, or equivalently, with no non-trivial local operators the corresponding partition function is one: Z(S 2 × S 1 ) = 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The minimal GEM realizing M = T 3 . Note that the corresponding TQFT partition function Z(T 3 ) has the meaning of the ground state degeneracy on T 2 , as well as the number of anyons (simple line operators) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The minimal GEM realizing Poincaré homology sphere [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_17.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-entropy in random tensor networks

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    For n=2, Rényi multi-entropies in RTNs are determined by minimal multiway cuts; the minimal multiway cut conjecture fails for integer n>2 with explicit counterexamples.

  2. Genuine Multi-Entropy in the Toric Code

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Genuine multi-entropy in the toric code reduces to topological entanglement entropy for stabilizer states at low replica index but captures independent topological data at n=4 and for non-stabilizer states.

  3. Universal entanglement probes of topological order and locally-achiral manifolds

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multi-entropy measures extract the topological partition function Z(M) for locally-achiral manifolds, enabling access to universal properties of 2+1d topological phases beyond S and T and detection of 4d beyond-cohomo...

  4. The Junction Law for Multipartite Entanglement in Confining Holographic Backgrounds

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The junction law for multipartite entanglement persists in confining holographic backgrounds, but phase structure and GM short-distance scaling (L^{-4}, L^{-2}, or L^{-2}(log L)^2) are background-dependent.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill,Topological entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 110404 [hep-th/0510092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Levin and X.-G

    M.A. Levin and X.-G. Wen,String net condensation: A Physical mechanism for topological phases,Phys. Rev. B71(2005) 045110 [cond-mat/0404617]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    B. Zeng, X. Chen, D.-L. Zhou and X.-G. Wen,Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter: From Quantum Entanglement to Topological Phases of Many-Body Systems, Quantum Science and Technology, Springer (2019), 10.1007/978-1-4939-9084-9, [1508.02595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Haah,An Invariant of Topologically Ordered States Under Local Unitary Transformations,Commun

    J. Haah,An Invariant of Topologically Ordered States Under Local Unitary Transformations,Commun. Math. Phys.342(2016) 771 [1407.2926]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Kawagoe and M

    K. Kawagoe and M. Levin,Microscopic definitions of anyon data,Physical Review B101(2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    B. Shi, K. Kato and I.H. Kim,Fusion rules from entanglement,Annals Phys. 418(2020) 168164 [1906.09376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Z.-P. Cian, M. Hafezi and M. Barkeshli,Extracting Wilson loop operators and fractional statistics from a single bulk ground state,2209.14302

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Jiang, Z

    H.-C. Jiang, Z. Wang and L. Balents,Identifying topological order by entanglement entropy,Nature Physics8(2012) 902–905

    2012

  9. [9]

    Zhang, T

    Y. Zhang, T. Grover, A. Turner, M. Oshikawa and A. Vishwanath, Quasi-particle Statistics and Braiding from Ground State Entanglement,Phys. Rev. B85(2012) 235151 [1111.2342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    Li and F.D.M

    H. Li and F.D.M. Haldane,Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states,Physical Review Letters101(2008)

    2008

  11. [11]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Jain and H. Kulkarni,Multi-partite entanglement monotones, 2406.17447

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    Gadde and S

    A. Gadde and S. Jain,Monotones from multi-invariants: a classification, 2509.06348

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. Jain, V. Krishna, H. Kulkarni and T. Sharma,Monotonicity conjecture for multi-party entanglement. Part I,JHEP02(2024) 025 [2308.16247]. 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki and K. Horodecki,Quantum entanglement,Reviews of Modern Physics81(2009) 865

    2009

  15. [15]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh and V. Vedral,Entanglement in many-body systems,Reviews of Modern Physics80(2008) 517

    2008

  16. [16]

    Gühne and G

    O. Gühne and G. Tóth,Entanglement detection,Physics Reports474(2009) 1

    2009

  17. [17]

    M. Ma, Y. Li and J. Shang,Multipartite entanglement measures: A review, Fundamental Research5(2025) 2489

    2025

  18. [18]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma,New multipartite entanglement measure and its holographic dual,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 126001 [2206.09723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma,Towards a classification of holographic multi-partite entanglement measures,JHEP08(2023) 202 [2304.06082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Gadde, J

    A. Gadde, J. Harper and V. Krishna,Multi-invariants and bulk replica symmetry,JHEP06(2025) 116 [2411.00935]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Iizuka and M

    N. Iizuka and M. Nishida,Genuine multientropy and holography,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 026011 [2502.07995]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Iizuka, S

    N. Iizuka, S. Lin and M. Nishida,More on genuine multientropy and holography, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 066014 [2504.16589]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Sheffer, A

    Y. Sheffer, A. Stern and E. Berg,Extracting Topological Spins from Bulk Multipartite Entanglement,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 086601 [2502.12259]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Sheffer, R

    Y. Sheffer, R. Fan, A. Stern, E. Berg and S. Ryu,Probing chiral topological states with permutation defects,2512.04649

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Signals of genuine multi-partite entanglement

    A. Gadde, “Signals of genuine multi-partite entanglement.” 2026

    2026

  26. [26]

    Pezzana,Sulla struttura topologica delle varieta‘ compatte,Atti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico dell’Universita‘ di Modena23(1974) 269

    M. Pezzana,Sulla struttura topologica delle varieta‘ compatte,Atti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico dell’Universita‘ di Modena23(1974) 269

    1974

  27. [27]

    Ferri,Una rappresentazione delle n-varieta‘ topologiche triangolabili mediante grafi (n+1)-colorati,Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana, Sez

    M. Ferri,Una rappresentazione delle n-varieta‘ topologiche triangolabili mediante grafi (n+1)-colorati,Bollettino dell’Unione Matematica Italiana, Sez. B (5)13(1976) 250

    1976

  28. [28]

    Ferri and C

    M. Ferri and C. Gagliardi,Crystallisation moves,Pacific Journal of Mathematics100(1982) 85. 40

    1982

  29. [29]

    Ferri, C

    M. Ferri, C. Gagliardi and L. Grasselli,A graph-theoretical representation of PL-manifolds — A survey on crystallizations,Aequationes Mathematicae31 (1986) 121

    1986

  30. [30]

    Gagliardi,Regular imbeddings of edge-coloured graphs,Geometriae Dedicata 11(1981) 397

    C. Gagliardi,Regular imbeddings of edge-coloured graphs,Geometriae Dedicata 11(1981) 397

    1981

  31. [31]

    Gagliardi,Extending the concept of genus to dimension n,Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society81(1981) 473

    C. Gagliardi,Extending the concept of genus to dimension n,Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society81(1981) 473

    1981

  32. [32]

    Lins and A

    S. Lins and A. Mandel,Graph-encoded 3-manifolds,Discrete Mathematics57 (1985) 261

    1985

  33. [33]

    Lins,Gems, Computers and Attractors for 3-Manifolds, vol

    S. Lins,Gems, Computers and Attractors for 3-Manifolds, vol. 5 ofSeries on Knots and Everything, World Scientific (1995), 10.1142/2490

    work page doi:10.1142/2490 1995

  34. [34]

    Lins and M

    S. Lins and M. Mulazzani,Blobs and flips on gems,Journal of Knot Theory and its Ramifications15(2006) 1001

    2006

  35. [35]

    Bandieri and C

    P. Bandieri and C. Gagliardi,Rigid gems in dimension n,1105.0507

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Turaev and O.Y

    V.G. Turaev and O.Y. Viro,State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols,Topology31(1992) 865

    1992

  37. [37]

    A.K. Jr. and B. Balsam,Turaev-Viro invariants as an extended TQFT, 2010

    2010

  38. [38]

    Blanchet, N

    C. Blanchet, N. Habegger, G. Masbaum and P. Vogel,Topological quantum field theories derived from the Kauffman bracket,Topology34(1995) 883

    1995

  39. [39]

    Turaev,Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds, vol

    V.G. Turaev,Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds, vol. 18, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Khovanov,Universal construction of topological theories in two dimensions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03361(2020)

    M. Khovanov,Universal construction of topological theories in two dimensions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03361(2020)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    TQFT reconstruction from reflection positivity (Lecture at NYU, 2025)

    J. McNamara, “TQFT reconstruction from reflection positivity (Lecture at NYU, 2025).”

    2025

  42. [42]

    De Renzi,Construction of extended topological quantum field theories, Ph.D

    M. De Renzi,Construction of extended topological quantum field theories, Ph.D. thesis, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2017

    2017

  43. [43]

    Barrett and B

    J. Barrett and B. Westbury,Invariants of piecewise-linear 3-manifolds, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society348(1996) 3997

    1996

  44. [44]

    Jr,String-net model of Turaev-Viro invariants, 2011

    A.K. Jr,String-net model of Turaev-Viro invariants, 2011. 41

    2011

  45. [45]

    Kadar, A

    Z. Kadar, A. Marzuoli and M. Rasetti,Microscopic description of 2d topological phases, duality and 3d state sums,Adv. Math. Phys.2010(2010) 671039 [0907.3724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    Koenig, G

    R. Koenig, G. Kuperberg and B.W. Reichardt,Quantum computation with Turaev–Viro codes,Annals Phys.325(2010) 2707 [1002.2816]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen,Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function,Physical review letters96(2006) 110405

    2006

  48. [48]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel and C. Schweigert,TFT construction of RCFT correlators

  49. [49]

    Partition functions,Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 353 [hep-th/0204148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  50. [50]

    Flammia, A

    S.T. Flammia, A. Hamma, T.L. Hughes and X.-G. Wen,Topological Entanglement Renyi Entropy and Reduced Density Matrix Structure,Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 261601 [0909.3305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Dijkgraaf and E

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

    1990

  52. [52]

    Crane and D

    L. Crane and D. Yetter,A Categorical construction of 4-D topological quantum field theories, 3, 1993 [hep-th/9301062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  53. [53]

    Crane, L.H

    L. Crane, L.H. Kauffman and D.N. Yetter,State sum invariants of four manifolds. 1.,hep-th/9409167

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Douglas and D.J

    C.L. Douglas and D.J. Reutter,Fusion 2-categories and a state-sum invariant for 4-manifolds,arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.11933(2018) [1812.11933]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Fliss, X

    J.R. Fliss, X. Wen, O. Parrikar, C.-T. Hsieh, B. Han, T.L. Hughes et al., Interface Contributions to Topological Entanglement in Abelian Chern-Simons Theory,JHEP09(2017) 056 [1705.09611]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    Akella, A

    S. Akella, A. Gadde and J. Pandey,Multi-invariants in stabilizer states, 2601.16258

    arXiv

  57. [57]

    Baez and J

    J.C. Baez and J. Dolan,Higher dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6073 [q-alg/9503002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  58. [58]

    Lurie,On the Classification of Topological Field Theories,0905.0465

    J. Lurie,On the Classification of Topological Field Theories,0905.0465

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems,Phys. Rev. B83(2011) 035107 [1008.3745]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    Fidkowski and A

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev,Topological phases of fermions in one dimension, Physical Review B83(2011) . 42

    2011

  61. [61]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Symmetry-protected topological orders for interacting fermions: Fermionic topological nonlinearσmodels and a special group supercohomology theory,Phys. Rev. B90(2014) 115141 [1201.2648]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    Z.-C. Gu, Z. Wang and X.-G. Wen,Lattice Model for Fermionic Toric Code, Phys. Rev. B90(2014) 085140 [1309.7032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Gaiotto and A

    D. Gaiotto and A. Kapustin,Spin TQFTs and fermionic phases of matter,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31(2016) 1645044 [1505.05856]. 43

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016