REVIEW 5 cited by
See, Think, Confirm: Interactive Prompting Between Vision and Language Models for Knowledge-based Visual Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large pre-trained vision and language models have demonstrated remarkable capacities for various tasks. However, solving the knowledge-based visual reasoning tasks remains challenging, which requires a model to comprehensively understand image content, connect the external world knowledge, and perform step-by-step reasoning to answer the questions correctly. To this end, we propose a novel framework named Interactive Prompting Visual Reasoner (IPVR) for few-shot knowledge-based visual reasoning. IPVR contains three stages, see, think and confirm. The see stage scans the image and grounds the visual concept candidates with a visual perception model. The think stage adopts a pre-trained large language model (LLM) to attend to the key concepts from candidates adaptively. It then transforms them into text context for prompting with a visual captioning model and adopts the LLM to generate the answer. The confirm stage further uses the LLM to generate the supporting rationale to the answer, verify the generated rationale with a cross-modality classifier and ensure that the rationale can infer the predicted output consistently. We conduct experiments on a range of knowledge-based visual reasoning datasets. We found our IPVR enjoys several benefits, 1). it achieves better performance than the previous few-shot learning baselines; 2). it enjoys the total transparency and trustworthiness of the whole reasoning process by providing rationales for each reasoning step; 3). it is computation-efficient compared with other fine-tuning baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
LaRe: Latent Refocusing for Multimodal Reasoning
LaRe performs iterative visual refocusing in latent space and reports accuracy gains with fewer tokens, but its main experiments compare against baselines trained with less data.
-
MagiC: Evaluating Multimodal Cognition Toward Grounded Visual Reasoning
MagiC evaluates answer correctness, reasoning validity, grounding fidelity, and self-correction on about 900 hand-annotated visual questions across 15 vision-language models.
-
VFaith: Do Large Multimodal Models Really Reason on Seen Images Rather than Previous Memories?
A new benchmark with edited-image question pairs shows that multimodal reasoning models lose accuracy when visual cues change, suggesting their reasoning is often not faithfully tied to the image.
-
MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs
A new 1,188-question multimodal benchmark covering deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning shows that leading MLLMs score around 60% and are especially weak at abductive reasoning.
-
MIND: Multi-rationale INtegrated Discriminative Reasoning Framework for Multi-modal Large Models
MIND improves multimodal reasoning by training on diverse correct and deliberately wrong rationales with two-stage correction and contrastive alignment, reporting SOTA on ScienceQA, A-OKVQA, and M3CoT.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.