Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 71 references

AMFlow 2.0 cuts the cost of high-precision multi-loop Feynman integrals enough to finish a three-loop five-point topology that was previously out of reach.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 06:50 UTC pith:GXXY7NRB

load-bearing objection Solid, usable engineering upgrade of a public multi-loop package; the PBB timings and DiffExp cross-check are real, and the FT-mode Euclidean caveat is already stated by the authors.

arxiv 2607.08477 v1 pith:GXXY7NRB submitted 2026-07-09 hep-ph hep-th

AMFlow 2.0: significant algorithmic and software improvements for Feynman integral evaluation

Rui-Jun Huang , Xiao Liu , Yan-Qing Ma This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-th
keywords Feynman integralsnumerical evaluationdifferential equationsauxiliary mass flowintegration-by-partsmulti-loopdimensional regularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that a major rewrite of the AMFlow package makes high-precision numerical evaluation of dimensionally regularized Feynman integrals practical for problems that used to be prohibitively expensive. The key upgrades are an alternative recursion that reduces the number of master integrals early, a new C++ differential-equation solver that replaces the old Mathematica one, interfaces to modern integration-by-parts reducers, and optional basis refinement. On a representative three-loop five-point family with 316 master integrals, the new code reaches twenty correct digits with total runtimes of a few hundred CPU hours, and the results match independent reference values. A sympathetic reader cares because multi-loop integrals are a bottleneck for precision collider predictions; any systematic reduction of that bottleneck widens the set of processes that can be computed reliably.

Core claim

AMFlow 2.0 reduces both the symbolic cost of constructing differential equations and the numerical cost of solving them, so that all 316 master integrals of the three-loop five-point PBB family can be evaluated to twenty correct digits in as little as roughly 174 CPU hours, with results that agree with DiffExp references.

What carries the argument

The auxiliary-mass-flow recursion (and its new Feynman-parameter alternative) that turns a hard multi-loop integral into a chain of simpler differential equations, now driven by a high-performance C++ solver and modern IBP reducers.

Load-bearing premise

The new Feynman-parameter recursion is only guaranteed to be correct in the Euclidean region because the contour around physical singularities is deformed randomly rather than systematically.

What would settle it

Re-run the same 316 PBB master integrals with DiffExp (or another independent high-precision method) at the same Euclidean point and check whether the twenty-digit agreement fails for any integral.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Three-loop five-point planar integrals that previously required analytic methods can now be cross-checked or evaluated numerically at moderate precision.
  • Users can trade symbolic cost for numerical cost by switching between the auxiliary-mass-flow and Feynman-parameter recursion modes.
  • When only moderate precision is needed, the remaining bottleneck is still IBP reduction rather than differential-equation solving.
  • The standalone C++ differential-equation solver can be reused outside AMFlow for other families of high-precision ODEs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once a systematic contour prescription exists, the Feynman-parameter mode may become competitive for physical-region phenomenology where auxiliary-mass flow currently dominates.
  • Further gains will most likely come from tighter coupling to newer IBP engines rather than from further solver speedups alone.
  • The same software stack could be used to generate high-precision numerical data for training or validating machine-learning surrogates of multi-loop amplitudes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents AMFlow 2.0, a major update of the public Mathematica package for numerical evaluation of dimensionally regularized Feynman integrals via auxiliary mass flow. New features include an alternative “FT” recursion mode based on the Hidding–Usovitsch Feynman-parameter combination, a high-performance C++ differential-equation solver (also available as a standalone YAML-driven executable), interfaces to modern IBP reducers (Blade, FIRE7, Kira3 with optional Ratracer), optional basis refinement to a factorized master-integral basis, caching, and a SkipReduction option. The package is benchmarked on the massless three-loop five-point PBB family (316 master integrals) at a Euclidean phase-space point, producing ε-expansions through finite terms with 20 correct digits. Tables 1–2 report symbolic and numerical CPU-hour costs for all combinations of recursion mode, reducer and solver; the best total is ~174 CPU hours (FT + Kira3+Ratracer + C++). Results are cross-checked against DiffExp using independent literature boundary conditions.

Significance. Three-loop five-point integrals remain a frontier for multi-loop phenomenology. The paper supplies a concrete, reproducible demonstration that a previously prohibitive topology can now be evaluated to high precision in a few hundred CPU hours with a publicly available package. Strengths include open-source release (GitLab), external validation against DiffExp, systematic timing tables covering every mode/reducer/solver combination, and a standalone C++ DE solver that is useful beyond AMFlow. Even restricting attention to the original AMF mode, the C++ solver and improved IBP interfaces already yield a substantial practical advance. The work is therefore of clear utility to the multi-loop community.

minor comments (5)
  1. Section 2.1 states that only Euclidean evaluations are guaranteed for FT mode because contour deformation is random/heuristic. This limitation is already acknowledged and does not affect the AMF-mode results or the DiffExp cross-check; a short explicit sentence in the abstract or introduction that the headline benchmark is Euclidean would still help readers who scan only those sections.
  2. Tables 1–2 report times in “CPU hours.” Clarifying the hardware (core count, clock speed, whether times are wall-clock or core-hours) would improve reproducibility of the performance claims.
  3. The option names and SetAMFOptions/SetReducerOptions syntax are useful; a one-line pointer in the main text to the CHANGELOG or README for the full list of new options would aid users migrating from 1.2.
  4. Figure 1 caption is minimal; a brief indication that the diagram is the PBB family of Ref. [49] would make the figure self-contained.
  5. A few typographical issues appear (e.g., missing spaces after commas in “state-of-the-artintegration-by-parts”, “boththesymbolic”). A light copy-edit pass would polish the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: performance and correctness claims are direct measurements cross-checked against external DiffExp references, not forced by definition or self-citation.

full rationale

AMFlow 2.0 is a methods/software paper whose central claims are (i) algorithmic additions (FT recursion mode from Hidding–Usovitsch, C++ DE solver, refined IBP interfaces, optional basis refinement) and (ii) measured wall-clock reductions on the three-loop five-point PBB family (Tables 1–2). The numerical results are validated by direct comparison to DiffExp using independent boundary data from the literature (Refs. [48,49]); the timings are raw CPU-hour measurements under stated option combinations. Self-citations to the original AMFlow papers merely supply the baseline method that is being improved; they do not define, fit, or force the new performance numbers or the digit-correctness claim. No uniqueness theorem, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-definitional identity appears in the derivation chain. The acknowledged limitation of random contour deformation (FT mode restricted to Euclidean kinematics) is stated openly and is not required for the headline AMF-mode timings that already match the external references. Consequently the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits zero circularity of the kinds enumerated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is an algorithmic/software paper. It inherits standard dimensional regularization, IBP reduction, and the auxiliary-mass-flow / Feynman-parameter differential-equation frameworks from the literature. No free parameters are fitted to data; the only ad-hoc modeling choice is the random contour deformation used for FT-mode Euclidean evaluations. No new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Dimensional regularization and the existence of a finite basis of master integrals under IBP identities.
    Standard background of multi-loop QCD/QFT calculations; used throughout Sections 1–2 without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption The auxiliary-mass-flow method correctly recovers the physical-point value from the large-η expansion via differential equations.
    Taken from the authors’ prior papers [21–24]; the present work treats it as given and only improves implementation.
  • ad hoc to paper Random contour deformation of the Feynman-parameter integral yields the correct Euclidean result for the FT recursion.
    Explicitly stated in Section 2.1 as a temporary heuristic; physical-region correctness is not claimed.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 15157 in / 2250 out tokens · 19202 ms · 2026-07-10T06:50:37.085448+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present significant improvements to the AMFlow package for the numerical computation of dimensionally regularized Feynman integrals. Several new features are introduced to reduce computational cost, including an alternative recursion mode, a high-performance differential equation solver, support for state-of-the-art integration-by-parts reducers and other useful improvements. We benchmark the new version on a three-loop five-point topology and find that both the symbolic and numerical performance are significantly improved.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08477 by Rui-Jun Huang, Xiao Liu, Yan-Qing Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The PBB integral family. Since the "FT" mode is currently guaranteed only in the Euclidean region, we choose a Euclidean phase-space point defined by ⃗s = {s12, s23, s34, s45, s51} =  − 36 29 , − 32 23 , − 45 31 , − 33 19 , − 25 18 , (4) where sij = (pi + pj ) 2 . We use the command SolveIntegrals[masters, 20, 6]; to obtain the ϵ expansions for the master integrals up to finite terms with 20 correct digi… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 58 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159–204 [InSPIRE]. 10

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    High-precision calculation of multi-loop Feynman integrals by difference equations

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087–5159 [hep-ph/0102033] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals

    J. Gluza, K. Kajda, and D. A. Kosower,Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 045012 [arXiv:1009.0472] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    K. J. Larsen and Y. Zhang,Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 041701 [arXiv:1511.01071] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    A novel approach to integration by parts reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger,A novel approach to integration by parts reduction,Phys. Lett. B744(2015) 101–104 [arXiv:1406.4513] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction

    T. Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction,JHEP12(2016) 030 [arXiv:1608.01902] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory

    P. Mastrolia and S. Mizera,Feynman Integrals and Intersection Theory,JHEP02(2019) 139 [arXiv:1810.03818] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 241402 [arXiv:2403.07781] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng,Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering atO(G 5), and loop integration,JHEP10(2024) 023 [arXiv:2406.01554] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    An automatized algorithm to compute infrared divergent multi-loop integrals

    T. Binoth and G. Heinrich,An automatized algorithm to compute infrared divergent multi-loop integrals,Nucl. Phys. B585(2000) 741–759 [hep-ph/0004013] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    E. E. Boos and A. I. Davydychev,A Method of evaluating massive Feynman integrals,Theor. Math. Phys.89(1991) 1052–1063 [InSPIRE]. 11

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    V. A. Smirnov,Analytical result for dimensionally regularized massless on-shell double box,Phys. Lett. B460(1999) 397–404 [hep-ph/9905323] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  13. [13]

    J. B. Tausk,Non-planar massless two-loop Feynman diagrams with four on-shell legs,Phys. Lett. B469(1999) 225–234 [hep-ph/9909506] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    A. V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158–164 [InSPIRE]

    work page 1991

  15. [15]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 251601 [arXiv:1304.1806] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    NNLO fermionic corrections to the charm quark mass dependent matrix elements in B -> X_s gamma

    R. Boughezal, M. Czakon, and T. Schutzmeier,NNLO fermionic corrections to the charm quark mass dependent matrix elements in ¯B→X sγ,JHEP09(2007) 072 [arXiv:0707.3090] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Tops from Light Quarks: Full Mass Dependence at Two-Loops in QCD

    M. Czakon,Tops from Light Quarks: Full Mass Dependence at Two-Loops in QCD,Phys. Lett. B664(2008) 307–314 [arXiv:0803.1400] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    pySecDec: a toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals

    S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, and T. Zirke,pySecDec: A toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.222(2018) 313–326 [arXiv:1703.09692] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions

    M. Hidding,DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.269(2021) 108125 [arXiv:2006.05510] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Evaluation of Feynman integrals with arbitrary complex masses via series expansions

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana, and A. Vicini, Evaluation of Feynman integrals with arbitrary complex masses via series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.282(2023) 108545 [arXiv:2205.03345] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals

    X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma, and C.-Y. Wang,A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals,Phys. Lett. B779(2018) 353–357 [arXiv:1711.09572] [InSPIRE]. 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Multiloop corrections for collider processes using auxiliary mass flow

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,Multiloop corrections for collider processes using auxiliary mass flow,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L051503 [arXiv:2107.01864] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Determining Feynman integrals with only input from linear algebra

    Z.-F. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,Determining Feynman Integrals with Only Input from Linear Algebra,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 222001 [arXiv:2201.11637] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    AMFlow: a Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via Auxiliary Mass Flow

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565 [arXiv:2201.11669] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Calculation of Feynman loop integration and phase-space integration via auxiliary mass flow

    X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma, W. Tao, and P. Zhang,Calculation of Feynman loop integration and phase-space integration via auxiliary mass flow,Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 013115 [arXiv:2009.07987] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Automatic computation of Feynman integrals containing linear propagators via auxiliary mass flow

    Z.-F. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,Automatic computation of Feynman integrals containing linear propagators via auxiliary mass flow,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 074003 [arXiv:2201.11636] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    One loop QCD corrections to $gg \to t\overline{t}H$ at $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)$

    F. Buccioni, P. A. Kreer, X. Liu, and L. Tancredi,One loop QCD corrections to gg→t tHatO(ϵ 2),JHEP03(2024) 093 [arXiv:2312.10015] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Efficient Computation of One-Loop Feynman Integrals and Fixed-Branch Integrals to High Orders in $\epsilon$

    R.-J. Huang, D.-S. Jian, Y.-Q. Ma, D.-M. Mu, and W.-H. Wu, Efficient computation of one-loop Feynman integrals and fixed-branch integrals to high orders inε,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 094028 [arXiv:2412.21054] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    R. M. Prisco, J. Ronca, and F. Tramontano,LINE: Loop Integrals Numerical Evaluation,JHEP07(2025) 219 [arXiv:2501.01943] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction

    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus,Reduze 2 - Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction, [arXiv:1201.4330] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    R. N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059 [arXiv:1310.1145] [InSPIRE]. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs

    T. Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs,JHEP07(2019) 031 [arXiv:1905.08019] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Z. Wu, J. Boehm, R. Ma, H. Xu, and Y. Zhang,NeatIBP 1.0, a package generating small-size integration-by-parts relations for Feynman integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.295(2024) 108999 [arXiv:2305.08783] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Z. Wu, J. Böhm, R. Ma, J. Usovitsch, Y. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Performing integration-by-parts reductions using NeatIBP 1.1 + Kira, [arXiv:2502.20778] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    X. Guan, X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma, and W.-H. Wu,Blade: A package for block-triangular form improved Feynman integrals decomposition, Comput. Phys. Commun.310(2025) 109538 [arXiv:2405.14621] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    A. V. Smirnov and M. Zeng,FIRE 7: Automatic Reduction with Modular Approach, [arXiv:2510.07150] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Kira - A Feynman Integral Reduction Program

    P. Maierhöfer, J. Usovitsch, and P. Uwer,Kira—A Feynman integral reduction program,Comput. Phys. Commun.230(2018) 99–112 [arXiv:1705.05610] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Integral Reduction with Kira 2.0 and Finite Field Methods

    J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierhöfer, and J. Usovitsch,Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods,Comput. Phys. Commun.266(2021) 108024 [arXiv:2008.06494] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch, and Z. Wu,Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection, [arXiv:2505.20197] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Feynman parameter integration through differential equations

    M. Hidding and J. Usovitsch,Feynman parameter integration through differential equations,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 036024 [arXiv:2206.14790] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Soft Theorem to Three Loops in QCD and ${\cal N} = 4$ Super Yang-Mills Theory

    W. Chen, M.-x. Luo, T.-Z. Yang, and H. X. Zhu,Soft theorem to three loops in QCD andN= 4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2024) 131 [arXiv:2309.03832] [InSPIRE]. 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Semi-automatic Calculations of Multi-loop Feynman Amplitudes with AmpRed

    W. Chen,Semi-automatic calculations of multi-loop Feynman amplitudes with AmpRed,Comput. Phys. Commun.312(2025) 109607 [arXiv:2408.06426] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    An Improvement of AmpRed: Analytic Continuation of Complex Integrals

    W. Chen,An Improvement of AmpRed: Analytic Continuation of Complex Integrals, [arXiv:2505.13540] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Rational Tracer: a Tool for Faster Rational Function Reconstruction

    V. Magerya,Rational Tracer: a Tool for Faster Rational Function Reconstruction, [arXiv:2211.03572] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Bertolini, G

    G. Bertolini, G. Fontana, and T. Peraro,CALICO: Computing Annihilators from Linear Identities Constraining (differential) Operators,JHEP10(2025) 018 [arXiv:2506.13653] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Factorization of denominators in integration-by-parts reductions

    J. Usovitsch,Factorization of denominators in integration-by-parts reductions, [arXiv:2002.08173] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    A. V. Smirnov and V. A. Smirnov,How to choose master integrals, Nucl. Phys. B960(2020) 115213 [arXiv:2002.08042] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Chicherin, Y

    D. Chicherin, Y. Wu, Z. Wu, Y. Xu, S.-Q. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, Complete computation of all three-loop five-point massless planar integrals, [arXiv:2512.17330] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Y. Liu, A. Matijašić, J. Miczajka, Y. Xu, Y. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Analytic computation of three-loop five-point Feynman integrals,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 016021 [arXiv:2411.18697] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    X. Guan, X. Li, and Y.-Q. Ma,Exploring the linear space of Feynman integrals via generating functions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 034027 [arXiv:2306.02927] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    B. Feng, X. Li, Y. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma, and Y. Zhang,Symbolic Reduction of Multi-loop Feynman Integrals via Generating Functions, [arXiv:2509.21769] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    B. Feng, X. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, and Y. Zhang,An Algorithm for the Symbolic Reduction of Multi-loop Feynman Integrals via Generating Functions, [arXiv:2605.09541] [InSPIRE]. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Feynman integral reduction with intersection theory made simple

    L.-H. Huang, Y.-Q. Ma, Z. Wang, and L. L. Yang,Feynman integral reduction with intersection theory made simple, [arXiv:2604.05025] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Smith and M

    S. Smith and M. Zeng,Feynman integral reduction using syzygy-constrained symbolic reduction rules,JHEP01(2026) 102 [arXiv:2507.11140] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    J. W. Liu and A. Mitov,Untangling the IBP Equations, [arXiv:2512.05923] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    de la Cruz and D

    L. de la Cruz and D. A. Kosower,Seedless Reduction of Feynman Integrals, [arXiv:2602.22111] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Feynman integral reduction by covariant differentiation

    G. von Gersdorff and V. Lessa,Feynman integral reduction by covariant differentiation, [arXiv:2604.09810] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Refining Integration-by-Parts Reduction of Feynman Integrals with Machine Learning

    M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm,Refining Integration-by-Parts Reduction of Feynman Integrals with Machine Learning,JHEP05 (2025) 185 [arXiv:2502.05121] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Explainable AI-assisted Optimization for Feynman Integral Reduction

    Z.-Y. Song, T.-Z. Yang, Q.-H. Cao, M.-x. Luo, and H. X. Zhu, Explainable AI-assisted Optimization for Feynman Integral Reduction, [arXiv:2502.09544] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Zeng,Reinforcement learning and metaheuristics for Feynman-integral reduction,Phys

    M. Zeng,Reinforcement learning and metaheuristics for Feynman-integral reduction,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 114051 [arXiv:2504.16045] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Efficient AI-Inspired Reduction of Feynman Integrals via Tube Seeding

    J. Berman, F. Charton, A. Luna, M. Wilhelm, and M. Zeng,Efficient AI-Inspired Reduction of Feynman Integrals via Tube Seeding, [arXiv:2606.10698] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Reduction to master integrals via intersection numbers and polynomial expansions

    G. Fontana and T. Peraro,Reduction to master integrals via intersection numbers and polynomial expansions,JHEP08(2023) 175 [arXiv:2304.14336] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Reduction to master integrals and transverse integration identities

    V. Chestnov, G. Fontana, and T. Peraro,Reduction to master integrals and transverse integration identities,JHEP03(2025) 113 [arXiv:2409.04783] [InSPIRE]. 16 [64]ε-collaboration, I. Breeet al.,The geometric bookkeeping guide to Feynman integral reduction andε-factorised differential equations, [arXiv:2506.09124] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    New algorithms for Feynman integral reduction and $\varepsilon$-factorised differential equations

    I. Breeet al.,New algorithms for Feynman integral reduction and ε-factorised differential equations, [arXiv:2511.15381] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    Fast evaluation of Feynman integrals for Monte Carlo generators

    P. Petit Rosàs and W. J. Torres Bobadilla,Fast evaluation of Feynman integrals for Monte Carlo generators,JHEP09(2025) 210 [arXiv:2507.12548] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Double virtual QCD corrections to $t\bar{t}+$jet production at the LHC

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, C. Brancaccio, M. Czakon, H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, and S. Zoia,Double virtual QCD corrections tott+jet production at the LHC,JHEP05(2026) 044 [arXiv:2511.11424] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Y. Liu, A. Matijašić, T. Peraro, Y. Xu, Z. Yang, and Y. Zhang, Two-loop Six-point Planar Massless Feynman Integrals to Higherϵ Orders, [arXiv:2603.16831] [InSPIRE]

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    IterInt: Evaluating iterated integrals via differential equations

    G. Baur and C. Duhr,IterInt: Evaluating iterated integrals via differential equations, [arXiv:2606.02744] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    CHESS: CHEbyshev pSeudo-Spectral transport for Feynman integral differential equations

    Y. Liu and Y. Zhang,CHESS: CHEbyshev pSeudo-Spectral transport for Feynman integral differential equations, [arXiv:2606.26691] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Solution of Canonical Differential Equations for Integrals on Arbitrary Geometries

    M. Czakon and L. Tancredi,Solution of Canonical Differential Equations for Integrals on Arbitrary Geometries, [arXiv:2606.30354] [InSPIRE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Chebyshev Approximations of Feynman Integrals for Collider Physics

    S. Abreu, A. Guerreiro, and B. Page,Chebyshev Approximations of Feynman Integrals for Collider Physics, [arXiv:2607.02411] [InSPIRE]. 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv