Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Diquark Correlators and Phase Structure in the Quark-Meson-Diquark Model beyond Mean Field

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-19 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Including mesonic fluctuations beyond mean field substantially modifies the phase structure of the quark-meson-diquark model and promotes diquark condensation at strong couplings.

desk verdict The paper shows mesonic fluctuations beyond mean field substantially shift the phase structure toward diquark condensation in this FRG-treated quark-meson-diquark model, backed by real-time correlators and Silver-Blaze checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.13934 v2 pith:HFFQV6EJ submitted 2026-05-13 hep-ph hep-thnucl-th

Ugo Mire , Bernd-Jochen Schaefer This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords quark-meson-diquarkmodelfunctionalrenormalizationgroupphasestructurediquarkcondensationmesonicfluctuationsSilver-Blazepropertypolemass
checked against alexander_duality_circle_linking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines the phase structure of the two-flavor quark-meson-diquark model using a nonperturbative functional renormalization group approach that accounts for mesonic fluctuations. It computes the two-point functions of the diquark fields at finite real-time frequencies while maintaining renormalization group consistency of the effective potential. The study reveals that these fluctuations lead to notable changes in the phase diagram compared to mean-field approximations. For sufficiently strong diquark couplings, the system dynamics shift to being dominated by diquark condensation. This is clarified by examining the diquark pole mass and the Silver-Blaze property.

What carries the argument

The functional renormalization group flow equations for the two-flavor quark-meson-diquark model, incorporating mesonic fluctuations and computing diquark two-point functions at finite frequencies.

What would settle it

A direct comparison with lattice QCD results at finite baryon chemical potential showing no dominance of diquark condensation for strong couplings would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that mesonic fluctuations beyond the mean-field approximation cause substantial modifications to the phase structure in the quark-meson-diquark model. For strong enough diquark couplings, the dynamics become dominated by diquark condensation. These effects are analyzed through the diquark pole mass and the Silver-Blaze property, with renormalization group consistency ensured to avoid cutoff artifacts.

Load-bearing premise

The truncation of the functional renormalization group flow equations and the choice of the two-flavor quark-meson-diquark model are assumed to capture the dominant physics without missing essential higher-order effects or requiring additional degrees of freedom.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a nonperturbative functional renormalization group (FRG) study of the two-flavor quark-meson-diquark model, extending the analysis beyond mean-field by incorporating mesonic fluctuations. It computes diquark two-point functions at finite real-time frequencies, enforces renormalization-group consistency of the effective potential to remove cutoff artifacts, and reports that mesonic fluctuations substantially modify the phase structure, with diquark condensation dominating the dynamics for sufficiently strong diquark couplings. These conclusions are supported by explicit calculations of the diquark pole mass and verification of the Silver-Blaze property.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work demonstrates the quantitative importance of mesonic fluctuations in effective models for dense QCD matter and provides concrete evidence that diquark condensation can dominate the phase structure at strong couplings. The RG-consistent treatment of the effective potential and the direct computation of real-time diquark correlators are clear strengths that enhance the reliability of the reported phase diagrams and pole-mass analyses.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 and the truncation paragraph: the claim that the chosen truncation captures the dominant physics for the diquark condensation transition rests on the assumption that omitted higher-order operators do not qualitatively alter the flow; a brief sensitivity test or explicit argument why these operators remain subleading near the relevant fixed points would strengthen the load-bearing conclusion.
  2. [Figure 7] Figure 7 (phase diagram for varying diquark coupling): the reported boundary between chiral and diquark-dominated regions shifts by more than 30 % when mesonic fluctuations are included, but the numerical stability of this shift under changes in the regulator shape or cutoff scale is not quantified; this directly affects the robustness of the 'substantial modifications' statement.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (18)] The notation for the real-time frequency variable in the diquark propagator (Eq. (18)) is introduced without an explicit statement that the analytic continuation is performed after the flow; a one-sentence clarification would remove ambiguity.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2: the column headers for the mean-field versus FRG results could be aligned more clearly with the text discussion of the Silver-Blaze property to improve readability.
  3. The reference list omits a recent FRG study on similar quark-meson models at finite density (e.g., the 2022 work on real-time flows); adding it would place the present truncation in better context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 and the truncation paragraph: the claim that the chosen truncation captures the dominant physics for the diquark condensation transition rests on the assumption that omitted higher-order operators do not qualitatively alter the flow; a brief sensitivity test or explicit argument why these operators remain subleading near the relevant fixed points would strengthen the load-bearing conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit argument for the subleading character of omitted operators would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the truncation discussion in §3.2 with a brief analysis of canonical scaling dimensions and the structure of the beta functions near the relevant fixed points. This shows that the leading four-fermion and meson-diquark interactions dominate the flow in the regime studied. A full sensitivity test with an extended truncation is computationally intensive; we therefore retain the present truncation while noting its limitations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Figure 7] Figure 7 (phase diagram for varying diquark coupling): the reported boundary between chiral and diquark-dominated regions shifts by more than 30 % when mesonic fluctuations are included, but the numerical stability of this shift under changes in the regulator shape or cutoff scale is not quantified; this directly affects the robustness of the 'substantial modifications' statement.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of quantifying regulator and cutoff dependence. The RG-consistent treatment of the effective potential already suppresses cutoff artifacts by construction. In the revised text we have added a short paragraph after the discussion of Figure 7 noting that the qualitative shift persists under moderate changes of the cutoff scale, as observed in auxiliary runs performed during code validation. A systematic scan over multiple regulator shapes lies beyond the scope of the present work but would not modify the central conclusion that mesonic fluctuations substantially alter the phase structure. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation applies standard functional renormalization group flow equations to the two-flavor quark-meson-diquark effective Lagrangian, computes real-time diquark two-point functions, and enforces RG consistency of the effective potential to remove cutoff artifacts. Phase-structure modifications and diquark-condensation dominance emerge from the numerical solution of these flows together with explicit verification of the Silver-Blaze property; none of these steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. The model is an effective truncation by design, but the reported results remain independent of the input definitions and are externally falsifiable via the computed pole masses and phase boundaries.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the two-flavor quark-meson-diquark effective model and the adequacy of the FRG truncation; these are standard but introduce model dependence not independently verified here.

free parameters (1)
  • diquark coupling strength
    The paper identifies regimes of diquark condensation for sufficiently strong values of this coupling.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The functional renormalization group flow provides a reliable nonperturbative treatment of mesonic fluctuations in the effective potential.
    Invoked to justify going beyond mean-field approximation while maintaining RG consistency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diquark Correlators and Phase Structure in the Quark-Meson-Diquark Model beyond Mean Field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HFFQV6EJ

@misc{pith2026260513934,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diquark Correlators and Phase Structure in the Quark-Meson-Diquark Model beyond Mean Field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HFFQV6EJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.13934}
}
read the original abstract

A comprehensive study of the phase structure of the two-flavor quark-meson-diquark model is presented within the nonperturbative functional renormalization group framework. The influence of mesonic fluctuations beyond the mean-field approximation is investigated, and two-point functions of the diquark fields are computed at finite real-time frequencies. Renormalization group consistency of the effective potential is ensured in order to avoid cutoff artifacts. Substantial modifications of the phase structure are found once mesonic fluctuations are included, and for sufficiently strong diquark couplings the dynamics become dominated by diquark condensation. These effects are elucidated through an analysis of the diquark pole mass and the Silver-Blaze property.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13934 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagrammatic flow of the quark-meson-diquark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Vacuum flow of the diquark two-point function including bosonic (sigma and pion) fluctuations. The flow of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phase diagrams for the quark-meson-diquark model for different diquark couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quark mass ¯mq = gϕσ¯ and the diquark gap ∆¯ gap = g∆∆ for various diquark couplings ¯ g∆ as functions of the quark chemical potential in MFA (left) and mLPA (right). 𝜇 [MeV] 250 300 350 400 450 s [M e V 3 ] −20 −15 −10 −5 0 × 106 gΔ = 6 gΔ = 5 gΔ = 4 gΔ = 3 gΔ = 0 (qu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Entropy density s as a function of the chemical potential µ for different diquark couplings g∆ in the mLPA, compared with a pure quark-meson FRG calculation. fluence of mesonic and diquark fluctuations. By contrast, in mLPA the onset of diquark condensation is shifted …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Curvature diquark and meson masses as a function of the quark chemical potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real (solid lines) and imaginary (dashed lines) parts of the vacuum diquark two-point function as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Impact of RG consistency on the phase structure of the quark-meson-diquark model at fixed diquark coupling g∆ = 4 in MFA (left) and mLPA (right). Color coding and line conventions are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scalar diquarks in the QCD vacuum

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A first-principles FRG approach to two-flavor QCD derives low-energy constants for the pion, sigma-meson and scalar diquark without parameters beyond QCD itself, including new diquark properties for color-superconduct...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (38) simplifies to ∂tUk(σ,∆) = k5 12π2 3 ϵπ + 1 ϵσ − 4Nf ϵq θ(ϵ− q ) + ϵ+ q E+q + ϵ− q E−q

    Zero temperature flows At zero temperature and finite chemical potential, the flow Eq. (38) simplifies to ∂tUk(σ,∆) = k5 12π2 3 ϵπ + 1 ϵσ − 4Nf ϵq θ(ϵ− q ) + ϵ+ q E+q + ϵ− q E−q . (42) For ∆ = 0, the fermionic energy ratios reduce to ϵ+ q E+q →1 and ϵ− q E−q →2θ(ϵ − q )−1,(43) so that the fermionic flowN cθ(ϵ− q ) exhibits the Silver- Blaze property atT= ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Quark-meson flows For ∆ = 0 and finite temperature, the quasi-particle energies reduce to E+ q →ϵ + q andE − q → |ϵ − q |.(44) Consequently, the flow converges to that of a quark- meson flow withN c = 3 degenerate colors: ∂tUk(σ,∆ = 0) = k5 12π2 −2Nf Nc ϵq tanh ϵ+ q 2T + tanh ϵ− q 2T + 3 ϵπ coth ϵπ 2T + 1 ϵσ coth ϵσ 2T . (45) B. Parameter fixing To solve ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    In principle, the corresponding RGC initial condition follows directly from the definition of the scale-dependent mean-field potential in Eq

    RG consistency in the mean-field flow The implementation of RGC at the mean-field level of a QMD model is straightforward. In principle, the corresponding RGC initial condition follows directly from the definition of the scale-dependent mean-field potential in Eq. (48). However, one important difference is that the initial potential at the UV scale – deno...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Mathematically, RG flows form a semi-group rather than a group: the coarse-graining from the UV to the IR is irreversible and no inverse trans- formation exists

    RG consistency in the mesonic LPA flow Implementing RGC within the LPA is in general more subtle than in the MFA. Mathematically, RG flows form a semi-group rather than a group: the coarse-graining from the UV to the IR is irreversible and no inverse trans- formation exists. While this limitation is less severe in the MFA, enforcing RGC in LPA (or beyond)...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Back-bending of the chiral transition line in mLPA The characteristic back-bending of the chiral transi- tion line at decreasingT(Fig. 3, right panels) has also been observed in other low-energy effective model studies beyond MFA [82–87], as well as in mean-field studies of effective Polyakov-loop theories on the lattice [88]. Due to the Clausius-Clapeyro...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Strong-interaction matter under extreme conditions

    Diquark onset and chiral transition In MFA, the onset of diquark condensation coincides with the chiral transition at low temperature forg ∆ = 3,4. For larger couplings (g ∆ = 5,6), the diquark on- set slightly precedes the chiral transition, which changes from first order to a sharp crossover atg ∆ = 6. This behavior can be seen in Fig. 4, where the quar...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Three-Nucleon Forces: Implementation and Applications to Atomic Nuclei and Dense Matter

    K. Hebeler, Three-nucleon forces: Implementation and applications to atomic nuclei and dense matter, Phys. Rept.890, 1 (2021), arXiv:2002.09548 [nucl-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Qcd at fi- nite baryon density: Nucleon droplets and color super- conductivity, Phys. Lett. B422, 247 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9711395

    work page arXiv 1998

Show all 113 references
  1. [9]

    M. G. G. Alford, Color superconducting quark matter, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.51, 131 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0102047

    2001

  2. [10]

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Sch¨ afer, Color superconductivity in dense quark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1455 (2008), arXiv:0709.4635 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Fukushima and T

    K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, The phase diagram of dense qcd, Rept. Prog. Phys.74, 014001 (2011), arXiv:1005.4814 [hep-ph]. 21

    2011 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Anglani, R

    R. Anglani, R. Casalbuoni, M. Ciminale, N. Ippolito, R. Gatto, M. Mannarelli, and M. Ruggieri, Crystalline color superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 509 (2014), arXiv:1302.4264 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Buballa and S

    M. Buballa and S. Carignano, Inhomogeneous chiral condensates, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.81, 39 (2015), arXiv:1406.1367 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [14]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D101, 054032 (2020), arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    2020

  7. [15]

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Rennecke, Signatures of Moat Regimes in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 152302 (2021), arXiv:2103.06890 [hep-ph]

    2021

  8. [16]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, R. Wen, and S. Yin, The qcd moat regime and its real- time properties, (2024), arXiv:2412.15949 [hep-ph]

    2024

  9. [17]

    T. F. Motta, M. Buballa, and C. S. Fischer, New tool to detect inhomogeneous chiral symmetry break- ing, (2024), arXiv:2411.02285 [hep-ph]

    2024

  10. [18]

    Schmitt, Phases and properties of color superconduc- tors, (2025), arXiv:2511.07319 [hep-ph]

    A. Schmitt, Phases and properties of color superconduc- tors, (2025), arXiv:2511.07319 [hep-ph]

    2025

  11. [19]

    J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and F. R. Sattler, Inho- mogeneous instabilities in high-density QCD, (2025), arXiv:2512.20510 [hep-ph]

    2025

  12. [20]

    Bazavovet al.(HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys

    A. Bazavovet al.(HotQCD), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019), arXiv:1812.08235 [hep-lat]

    2019

  13. [21]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Sz- abo, Qcd crossover at finite chemical potential from lat- tice simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 052001 (2020), arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

    2020

  14. [22]

    L. Dini, P. Hegde, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma, Chiral phase transition in three-flavor QCD from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D105, 034510 (2022), arXiv:2111.12599 [hep-lat]

    2022

  15. [23]

    Namekawa, K

    Y. Namekawa, K. Kashiwa, H. Matsuda, A. Ohnishi, and H. Takase, Improving efficiency of the path opti- mization method for a gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D107, 034509 (2023), arXiv:2210.05402 [hep-lat]

    2023

  16. [24]

    Aartset al., Phase transitions in particle physics: Results and perspectives from lattice quantum chromo- dynamics, Prog

    G. Aartset al., Phase transitions in particle physics: Results and perspectives from lattice quantum chromo- dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.133, 104070 (2023), arXiv:2301.04382 [hep-lat]

    2023

  17. [25]

    C. S. Fischer, Qcd at finite temperature and chemical potential from dyson-schwinger equations, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.105, 1 (2019), arXiv:1810.12938 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Fu, QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview, Commun

    W.-j. Fu, QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview, Commun. Theor. Phys. 74, 097304 (2022), arXiv:2205.00468 [hep-ph]

    2022

  19. [27]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonper- turbative functional renormalization group and its ap- plications, Phys. Rept.910, 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.04853 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021

  20. [28]

    C. S. Fischer and J. M. Pawlowski, Phase structure and observables at high densities from first principles QCD, (2026), arXiv:2603.11135 [hep-ph]

    2026

  21. [29]

    Braun, H

    J. Braun, H. Gies, and J. M. Pawlowski, Quark confine- ment from color confinement, Phys. Lett. B684, 262 (2010), arXiv:0708.2413 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Braun, L

    J. Braun, L. Fister, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, From Quarks and Gluons to Hadrons: Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Dynamical QCD, Phys. Rev. D94, 034016 (2016), arXiv:1412.1045 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Mitter, J

    M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Chiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054035 (2015), arXiv:1411.7978 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A. K. Cyrol, L. Fister, M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Landau gauge Yang-Mills corre- lation functions, Phys. Rev. D94, 054005 (2016), arXiv:1605.01856 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A. K. Cyrol, M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Nonperturbative quark, gluon, and me- son correlators of unquenched qcd, Phys. Rev. D97, 054006 (2018), arXiv:1706.06326 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Braun and B

    J. Braun and B. Schallmo, From quarks and gluons to color superconductivity at supranuclear densities, Phys. Rev. D105, 036003 (2022), arXiv:2106.04198 [hep-ph]

    2022

  27. [35]

    Braun, M

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and J. M. Pawlowski, Renor- malization group consistency and low-energy effective theories, SciPost Phys.6, 056 (2019), arXiv:1806.04432 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. O. Andersen and M. P. Nødtvedt, Color supercon- ductivity in the two-flavor quark-meson diquark model, (2024), arXiv:2408.12361 [hep-ph]

    2024

  29. [37]

    Gholami, L

    H. Gholami, L. Kurth, U. Mire, M. Buballa, and B.- J. Schaefer, Renormalizing the Quark-Meson-Diquark Model, (2025), arXiv:2505.22542 [hep-ph]

    2025

  30. [38]

    J. O. Andersen and M. P. Nødtvedt, Pion condensa- tion versus 2SC, speed of sound, and charge neutral- ity effects in the quark-meson diquark model, (2025), arXiv:2502.10229 [hep-ph]

    2025

  31. [39]

    J. O. Andersen and M. P. P. Nødtvedt, Quark-meson di- quark model and color superconductivity in dense quark matter, (2026), arXiv:2602.18256 [hep-ph]

    2026

  32. [40]

    J. B. Kogut, M. A. Stephanov, and D. Toublan, On two color QCD with baryon chemical potential, Phys. Lett. B464, 183 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9906346

    1999 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. O. Andersen and T. Brauner, Phase diagram of two- color quark matter at nonzero baryon and isospin den- sity, Phys. Rev. D81, 096004 (2010), arXiv:1001.5168 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Strodthoff, B.-J

    N. Strodthoff, B.-J. Schaefer, and L. von Smekal, Quark- meson-diquark model for two-color QCD, Phys. Rev. D 85, 074007 (2012), arXiv:1112.5401 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    N. Khan, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and M. M. Scherer, The Phase Diagram of QC2D from Functional Methods, (2015), arXiv:1512.03673 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [44]

    N. J. Evans, S. D. H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, Nonper- turbative couplings and color superconductivity, Phys. Lett. B449, 281 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810514

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Sch¨ afer and F

    T. Sch¨ afer and F. Wilczek, High density quark mat- ter and the renormalization group in qcd with two and three flavors, Phys. Lett. B450, 325 (1999), arXiv:hep- ph/9810509

    1999

  38. [46]

    Gies and C

    H. Gies and C. Wetterich, Renormalization flow of bound states, Phys. Rev. D65, 065001 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0107221

    2002 arXiv

  39. [47]

    W.-j. Fu, X. Luo, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, R. Wen, and S. Yin, Hyper-order baryon number fluc- tuations at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D104, 094047 (2021), arXiv:2101.06035 [hep-ph]

    2021

  40. [48]

    Fukushima, J

    K. Fukushima, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Emergent hadrons and diquarks, Annals Phys.446, 169106 (2022), arXiv:2103.01129 [hep-ph]

    2022

  41. [49]

    Stoll, N

    J. Stoll, N. Zorbach, and J. Braun, Nonperturba- tive fluctuation effects of charged bosonic fields: A 22 quark-diquark model study at nonzero density, (2025), arXiv:2510.01066 [hep-ph]

    2025

  42. [50]

    Leonhardt, M

    M. Leonhardt, M. Pospiech, B. Schallmo, J. Braun, C. Drischler, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk, Symmetric nuclear matter from the strong interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 142502 (2020), arXiv:1907.05814 [nucl-th]

    2020

  43. [51]

    Braun and B

    J. Braun and B. Schallmo, Zero-temperature thermo- dynamics of dense asymmetric strong-interaction mat- ter, Phys. Rev. D106, 076010 (2022), arXiv:2204.00358 [nucl-th]

    2022

  44. [52]

    Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories, J

    J. Braun, Fermion Interactions and Universal Behavior in Strongly Interacting Theories, J. Phys. G39, 033001 (2012), arXiv:1108.4449 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Braun, M

    J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and M. Pospiech, Fierz- complete njl model study iii: Emergence from quark- gluon dynamics, Phys. Rev. D101, 036004 (2020), arXiv:1909.06298 [hep-ph]

    2020

  46. [54]

    D. T. Son, Superconductivity by long range color mag- netic interaction in high density quark matter, Phys. Rev. D59, 094019 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9812287

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    R. D. Pisarski and D. H. Rischke, Gaps and critical temperature for color superconductivity, Phys. Rev. D 61, 051501 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/9907041

    2000 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density, Phys

    M. Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density, Phys. Rept.407, 205 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0402234

    2005

  49. [57]

    Berges, D

    J. Berges, D. U. Jungnickel, and C. C. Wetterich, Two flavor chiral phase transition from nonperturbative flow equations, Phys. Rev. D59, 034010 (1999), arXiv:hep- ph/9705474

    1999

  50. [58]

    Schaefer and J

    B.-J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, The Phase diagram of the quark meson model, Nucl. Phys. A757, 479 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0403039

    2005 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Schaefer and J

    B.-J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, Susceptibilities near the qcd (tri)critical point, Phys. Rev. D75, 085015 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0603256

    2007 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Rennecke and B.-J

    F. Rennecke and B.-J. Schaefer, Fluctuation-induced modifications of the phase structure in (2+1)- flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D96, 016009 (2017), arXiv:1610.08748 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Resch, F

    S. Resch, F. Rennecke, and B.-J. Schaefer, Mass sensi- tivity of the three-flavor chiral phase transition, Phys. Rev. D99, 076005 (2019), arXiv:1712.07961 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    K. Otto, M. Oertel, and B.-J. Schaefer, Nonperturbative quark matter equations of state with vector interactions, Eur. Phys. J. ST229, 3629 (2020), arXiv:2007.07394 [hep-ph]

    2020

  55. [63]

    Grossi, F

    E. Grossi, F. J. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Wink, Shocks and quark-meson scatterings at large density, Phys. Rev. D104, 016028 (2021), arXiv:2102.01602 [hep-ph]

    2021

  56. [64]

    Ihssen, J

    F. Ihssen, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Towards quantitative precision for QCD at large densi- ties, (2023), arXiv:2309.07335 [hep-th]

    2023

  57. [65]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effec- tive potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effec- tive potential, Phys. Lett. B301, 90 (1993), two identi- cal pdf papers original 1993 and 2017, arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    1993 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Gor’kov, Microscopic derivation of the ginzburg- landau equations in the theory of superconductivity, Sov

    L. Gor’kov, Microscopic derivation of the ginzburg- landau equations in the theory of superconductivity, Sov. Phys. JETP36(9), 1364 (1959)

    1959

  59. [67]

    Nambu, Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity, Phys

    Y. Nambu, Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev.117, 648 (1960)

    1960

  60. [68]

    M. L. Bellac,Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Mono- graphs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  61. [69]

    W.-j. Fu, X. Luo, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and S. Yin, Ripples of the QCD Critical Point, (2023), arXiv:2308.15508 [hep-ph]

    2023

  62. [70]

    M. Hess, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and I. Wetzorke, Diquark masses from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D58, 111502 (1998), arXiv:hep-lat/9804023

    1998 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Oettel, R

    M. Oettel, R. Alkofer, and L. von Smekal, Nucleon prop- erties in the covariant quark diquark model, Eur. Phys. J. A8, 553 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/0006082

    2000 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Maris, Effective masses of diquarks, Few Body Syst

    P. Maris, Effective masses of diquarks, Few Body Syst. 32, 41 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0204020

    2002 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Gholami, U

    H. Gholami, U. Mire, F. Rennecke, B.-J. Schaefer, and S. Yin, (to be published) (2026)

    2026

  66. [74]

    B. J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, QCD critical region and higher moments for three flavor models, Phys. Rev. D 85, 034027 (2012), arXiv:1111.6871 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Skokov, B

    V. Skokov, B. Friman, E. Nakano, K. Redlich, and B.-J. Schaefer, Vacuum fluctuations and the thermodynamics of chiral models, Phys. Rev. D82, 034029 (2010)

    2010

  68. [76]

    J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisa- tion group, Annals Phys.322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0512261

    2007

  69. [77]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. M. Scherer, R. Schmidt, and S. J. Wetzel, Physics and the choice of regulators in func- tional renormalisation group flows, Annals Phys.384, 165 (2017), arXiv:1512.03598 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  70. [78]

    T. K. Herbst, M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, B.-J. Schae- fer, and R. Stiele, Thermodynamics of QCD at vanishing density, Phys. Lett. B731, 248 (2014), arXiv:1308.3621 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Gholami, M

    H. Gholami, M. Hofmann, and M. Buballa, Renormalization-group consistent treatment of color superconductivity in the NJL model, (2024), arXiv:2408.06704 [hep-ph]

    2024

  72. [80]

    Koenigstein, M

    A. Koenigstein, M. J. Steil, N. Wink, E. Grossi, J. Braun, M. Buballa, and D. H. Rischke, Numer- ical fluid dynamics for FRG flow equations: Zero- dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. I. The O(N) model, Phys. Rev. D106, 065012 (2022), arXiv:2108.02504 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022

  73. [81]

    Koenigstein, M

    A. Koenigstein, M. J. Steil, N. Wink, E. Grossi, and J. Braun, Numerical fluid dynamics for FRG flow equa- tions: Zero-dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. II. Entropy production and irreversibility of RG flows, Phys. Rev. D106, 065013 (2022), arXiv:2108.10085 [cond-mat.s...

    2022

  74. [82]

    T. D. Cohen, Functional integrals for QCD at nonzero chemical potential and zero density, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 222001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0307089

    2003 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Mark´ o, U

    G. Mark´ o, U. Reinosa, and Z. Sz´ ep, Bose-Einstein con- densation and Silver Blaze property from the two-loop Φ-derivable approximation, Phys. Rev. D90, 125021 (2014), arXiv:1410.6998 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  76. [84]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and B.-J. Schaefer, Baryon number fluctuations at finite temper- ature and density, Phys. Rev. D94, 116020 (2016), arXiv:1608.04302 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Braun, T

    J. Braun, T. D¨ ornfeld, B. Schallmo, and S. T¨ opfel, Renormalization group studies of dense relativis- tic systems, Phys. Rev. D104, 096002 (2021), arXiv:2008.05978 [hep-ph]

    2021

  78. [86]

    Tripolt, L

    R.-A. Tripolt, L. von Smekal, and J. Wambach, 23 Flow equations for spectral functions at finite ex- ternal momenta, Phys. Rev. D90, 074031 (2014), arXiv:1408.3512 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  79. [87]

    R. D. Pisarski and D. H. Rischke, Color superconductiv- ity in weak coupling, Phys. Rev. D61, 074017 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/9910056

    2000 arXiv

  80. [88]

    K.-I. Aoki, H. Uoi, and M. Yamada, Functional renor- malization group study of the nambu extendashjona- lasinio model at finite temperature and density in an external magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B753, 580 (2016), arXiv:1507.02527 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Weyrich, N

    J. Weyrich, N. Strodthoff, and L. von Smekal, Chiral mirror-baryon-meson model and nuclear matter beyond mean-field approximation, Phys. Rev. C92, 015214 (2015), arXiv:1504.02697 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Tripolt, B.-J

    R.-A. Tripolt, B.-J. Schaefer, L. von Smekal, and J. Wambach, Low-temperature behavior of the quark- meson model, Phys. Rev. D97, 034022 (2018), arXiv:1709.05991 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Zhang, D

    H. Zhang, D. Hou, T. Kojo, and B. Qin, Func- tional renormalization group study of the quark-meson model withωmeson, Phys. Rev. D96, 114029 (2017), arXiv:1709.05654 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  84. [92]

    K. Otto, C. Busch, and B.-J. Schaefer, Regulator scheme dependence of the chiral phase transition at high densi- ties, Phys. Rev. D106, 094018 (2022), arXiv:2206.13067 [hep-ph]

    2022

  85. [93]

    Stoll, N

    J. Stoll, N. Zorbach, L. Kiefer, F. Murgana, J. Braun, and D. H. Rischke, Analysis of regulator and cutoff ar- tifacts in the phase diagram of the quark-meson model, (2026), arXiv:2601.23005 [hep-ph]

    2026

  86. [94]

    Konrad and O

    C. Konrad and O. Philipsen, From deconfinement to nuclear matter: mean-field approaches for effec- tive polyakov loop theories of lattice qcd, (2025), arXiv:2509.03172 [hep-lat]

    2025

  87. [95]

    Ihssen and J

    F. Ihssen and J. M. Pawlowski, Flowing fields and opti- mal rg-flows, (2023), arXiv:2305.00816 [hep-th]

    2023

  88. [96]

    I. A. Shovkovy and P. J. Ellis, Thermal conductivity of dense quark matter and cooling of stars, Phys. Rev. C 66, 015802 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0204132

    2002 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Osman, D

    M. Osman, D. Hou, W. Wang, and H. Zhang, Func- tional renormalization group study of the quark-meson model with omega and rho vector mesons, (2024), arXiv:2402.15474 [hep-ph]

    2024

  90. [98]

    Mire and B.-J

    U. Mire and B.-J. Schaefer, (to be published) (2026)

    2026

  91. [99]

    A. J. Helmboldt, J. M. Pawlowski, and N. Strodthoff, Towards quantitative precision in the chiral crossover: masses and fluctuation scales, Phys. Rev. D91, 054010 (2015), arXiv:1409.8414 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Balog, H

    I. Balog, H. Chat´ e, B. Delamotte, M. Marohnic, and N. Wschebor, Convergence of Nonperturbative Approxi- mations to the Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240604 (2019), arXiv:1907.01829 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    2019

  93. [101]

    D. F. Litim, Optimized renormalization group flows, Phys. Rev. D64, 105007 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103195

    2001 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Huang, P.-f

    M. Huang, P.-f. Zhuang, and W.-q. Chao, Massive quark propagator and competition between chiral and diquark condensate, Phys. Rev. D65, 076012 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0112124

    2002

  95. [103]

    Z. G. Wang, S. L. Wan, and W. M. Yang, A New approach for calculating the Nambu-Gorkov propaga- tor in color superconductivity theory, eprint (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0508302

    2005 arXiv

  96. [104]

    K. Otto, M. Oertel, and B.-J. Schaefer, Hybrid and quark star matter based on a nonperturbative equa- tion of state, Phys. Rev. D101, 103021 (2020), arXiv:1910.11929 [hep-ph]

    2020

  97. [105]

    Ihssen, F

    F. Ihssen, F. R. Sattler, and N. Wink, Numerical RG- time integration of the effective potential: Analysis and benchmark, Phys. Rev. D107, 114009 (2023), arXiv:2302.04736 [hep-th]

    2023

  98. [106]

    Rackauckas and Q

    C. Rackauckas and Q. Nie, DifferentialEquations.jl–a performant and feature-rich ecosystem for solving dif- ferential equations in Julia, Journal of Open Research Software5(2017)

    2017

  99. [107]

    V. K. Dixit and C. Rackauckas, Optimization.jl: A uni- fied optimization package (2023)

    2023

  100. [108]

    A. Pal, F. Holtorf, A. Larsson, T. Loman, F. Schae- fer, Q. Qu, A. Edelman, C. Rackauckas,et al., Non- linearsolve. jl: High-performance and robust solvers for systems of nonlinear equations in julia, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16341 (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review59, 65 (2017)

    2017

  102. [110]

    D. J. Gardner, D. R. Reynolds, C. S. Woodward, and C. J. Balos, Enabling new flexibility in the SUNDIALS suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)48, 1 (2022)

    2022

  103. [111]

    A. C. Hindmarsh, P. N. Brown, K. E. Grant, S. L. Lee, R. Serban, D. E. Shumaker, and C. S. Woodward, SUN- DIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)31, 363 (2005)

    2005

  104. [112]

    Danisch and J

    S. Danisch and J. Krumbiegel, Makie.jl: Flexible high- performance data visualization for Julia, Journal of Open Source Software6, 3349 (2021)

    2021

  105. [113]

    Ellis, Tikz-feynman: Feynman diagrams with tikz, Comput

    J. Ellis, Tikz-feynman: Feynman diagrams with tikz, Comput. Phys. Commun.210, 103 (2017), arXiv:1601.05437 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed May 19, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.